Labour's Everyman, –

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Labour's Everyman, – ch1-2.008 7/8/02 2:44 PM Page 1 Labour’s Everyman, – On April a group of figures appeared on the Northumberland horizon walk- ing slowly in the brilliant sunlight along Hadrian’s Wall. Included in the party were officials of local antiquarian societies, civil servants, businessmen, and newspaper reporters. In the midst was the Cabinet minister from Whitehall: a large-framed seventy-year-old man, with white hair and ruddy face adorned by mutton-chop whiskers, attired in an old alpaca suit and bowler hat. Instantly recognized wherever he went, he possessed an unmistakable ringing voice, in which he greeted everyone as his friend. At Housesteads, the official retinue stopped to concentrate on the silent stones. Characteristically, the minister conversed warmly with the eighty-one-year-old keeper of the fortification, Thomas Thompson, before pondering the moral and political dilemma revealed by the threat of extensive quarrying to the Roman Wall. As the Cabinet minister in the second Labour government responsible for national monuments and historic sites, George Lansbury was steeped in British his- tory. However, he recognized that , tons of quarried stone provided the pos- sibility of permanent employment in a region blighted by the inter-war Depression, but only at the expense of one of the most striking and beautiful stretches of the ancient monument.1 In Britain today, George Lansbury is probably remembered best, not as the First Commissioner of Works, but as the humanitarian and Christian pacifist leader of the Labour Party, apparently out of touch with the realpolitik of European affairs in the s. Lansbury’s unilateralist conscience was increasingly in conflict with his role as party leader as Labour faced up to rearmament in the face of the threat of international Fascism. In an encounter memorable in British politics at the Labour party conference at the Dome in Brighton, the pugnacious trade union boss, Ernest Bevin, drove the pacifist George Lansbury from the leadership in a brutal speech, sharpened by accusation and betrayal of party loyalty. In an active life, which extended from Victorian Britain to the Second World War, George Lansbury was a passionate supporter of more minority causes and organizations than any other contemporary politician. In his crusades for social justice and the underprivileged, he twice suffered imprisonment for his political 1 ‘Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings’ file, PRO, WORK / . George Lansbury was known affectionately during his life-time as ‘G. L.’ (or, simply, ‘George’ to those who were close to him). In this book he is mostly referred to as ‘Lansbury’. ch1-2.008 7/8/02 2:44 PM Page 2 Labour’s Everyman beliefs and also surrendered his parliamentary seat in the women’s cause. After a rapturous reception for Lansbury at a mass rally of the unemployed in Hyde Park, Clem Attlee, his successor as party leader and future Labour Prime Minister, wrote to his pacifist brother, Tom: ‘[W]e tell him he is almost a Gandhi’.2 Yet, in some quarters, Lansbury’s actions provoked criticisms of sentimentality and lack of real- ism, captured in the famous phrase attributed to the Liberal MP, Augustine Birrell: ‘the trouble with Lansbury is that he will let his bleeding heart run away with his bloody head.’3 By contrast, Fabian historian, Margaret Cole, remembered George Lansbury as ‘the friendliest person she had ever met’. She recalled his tireless endeavours for ordinary people and included a random list of twelve organizations associated with the socialist pioneer: ‘all struggling bodies, all chronically hard-up for cash, all working for the ‘underdog’. However, Dame Margaret chose Lansbury among her fifteen ‘makers of the labour movement’ only eight years after his death, as she felt his memory was already fading.4 Today it is difficult to comprehend the unparalleled affection ordinary people felt in this country and beyond for the Labour pioneer. Lansbury fully merited A. J. P. Taylor’s description as ‘the most lovable figure in modern politics’, a view common among his contemporaries across the political spectrum.5 He enjoyed a friendship of nearly thirty years with Edward Aubrey Hastings Jay, the Municipal Reform candidate who defeated him at Woolwich in the London County Council (LCC) election.6 Lansbury achieved all the elective offices in political life from poor law guardian to Cabinet minister and party leader and was most nat- urally at home among ‘the common people’, as could be observed at Hadrian’s Wall in . In the words of his son, Edgar: ‘For him “the common people” are coal- men, dustmen, porters, postmen, navvies, bricklayers, clerks, sailors, soldiers, shopkeepers, grocers, engineers, carmen, chauffeurs, the unemployed and their wives. Company directors, stockbrokers, statesmen, archbishops, and experts in 2 Clement Attlee to Tom Attlee, Feb. , Attlee Papers, fo. 3 P. Snowden, An Autobiography, i, – (), p. 4 M. Cole, Makers of the Labour Movement (), pp. –. To Sophie Brown, from a politically active Stepney family, Lansbury was her favourite speaker at the annual Hyde Park Rally. ‘I knew he was the MP for Bow, but with his white hair and pink cheeks he was my idea of God, Father Christmas, a favourite uncle and a hero all rolled up into one.’ P. Preston, Tired and Emotional: The Life of Lord George-Brown (), p. I owe this reference to Chris Wrigley. 5 A. J. P. Taylor, English History, – (Oxford, ), p. n.. Lansbury was a close friend of Taylor’s father, Percy, and like others on the political left, such as Arthur Henderson, a regular visitor to the Taylor family household in Southport. A. J. P. Taylor, A Personal History (), pp. –, ; A. Sisman, A. J. P. Taylor: A Biography (), p. A. J. P. Taylor might never have become a famous his- torian. He could have joined the law firm of his uncle Harry—W. H. Thompson, leading left-wing solici- tor to the Poplar councillors during the Rates Rebellion. Later, Taylor considered the possibility of a post as an inspector in the Office of Works when Lansbury was First Commissioner of Works. K. Burke, Troublemaker: The Life and History of A. J. P. Taylor (New Haven, ), pp. , –, –. 6 The late Douglas Jay recalled that he and his father, Edward, visited George Lansbury in Manor House Hospital in Hampstead after the Labour leader’s serious accident in . I am grateful for an interview with Lord Jay at Minster Lovell, Sept. See also D. Jay, Change and Fortune: A Political Record (), p. ch1-2.008 7/8/02 2:44 PM Page 3 George Lansbury general may be common, but they are not the common people.’7 Unlike some socialist leaders, Lansbury avoided the infamous ‘aristocratic embrace’ throughout his political career. He did not seek personal wealth or social status. Above all, he practised in his public and private life the Christian principles which inspired his socialism, pacifism, internationalism, and support for women’s rights. An un- bridled passion for social justice and unshakable belief in democracy sustained Lansbury’s lifetime of public service in local government and on the national stage. Many of his contemporaries testified that George Lansbury was also a pragmatic politician of considerable skill and experience. In a memorable phrase Harold Laski, one of the leading British intellectuals of the twentieth century, recalled that George Lansbury ‘was not a clear thinker, but had a heart which reached beyond the stars’. He added: ‘Contact with Lansbury was a great education. He was absolutely straightforward, absolutely democratic, and entirely fearless. He always meant every word he said, and it never occurred to him to say less than he meant.’8 Laski dismissed the charge that Lansbury had ‘no taut intellectual doctrine to preach’. Instead, the English philosopher proclaimed that only by meeting Lansbury was it possible to know the meaning of a ‘passionate conviction for a great ideal’. ‘Send him to a meeting, and you find the audience feeling that, with just one more effort, they may be on the high road to the promised land,’ Laski declared.9 Though most of his political life was spent in the British Labour party, Lansbury first joined the Gladstonian Liberals, as did most of the early socialist leaders. As a party agent, he masterminded three election victories before his conversion to socialist propagandist in the s. In the Labour party he was first its popular but stormy petrel, often in opposition to the Labour leadership of Ramsay MacDonald. Lansbury led the famous, or infamous, ‘Poplar Rates Rebellion’ of . Thirty Labour councillors went to gaol and ‘Poplarism’ entered the political vocabulary as the symbol of local defiance of central government.10 Then, after the catastrophic general election defeat, at the nadir of Labour’s political fortunes, Lansbury became party leader, almost by default. In Parliament, the people’s politician from East London proved indefatigable in rallying the forty-six opposition Labour MPs against the National Government and in raising the morale of the labour move- ment throughout the country. During his lifetime, George Lansbury published an autobiography of sorts in , followed by a second book of recollections seven years later.11 In his article ‘What I Should Like to Read about Myself ’, in The Listener ‘auto-obituary’ series that asked contemporary figures to attempt a self-assessment for posterity, Lans- bury suggested that ‘He was proud to belong to the common people, had no class 7 E. Lansbury, George Lansbury, My Father (), p. ; Taylor, A Personal History, pp. , . 8 H. J. Laski, ‘Why I Am a Marxist’, Nation, Jan. , p. 9 For this portrait of Lansbury, see Harold Laski’s ‘Introduction’ to G. Lansbury, My Life ( edn), pp. ix–xv. 10 For the Poplar Rates Rebellion, see N.
Recommended publications
  • The Membership of the Independent Labour Party, 1904–10
    DEI AN HOP KIN THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE INDEPENDENT LABOUR PARTY, 1904-10: A SPATIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL ANALYSIS E. P. Thompson expressed succinctly the prevailing orthodoxy about the origins of the Independent Labour Party when he wrote, in his homage to Tom Maguire, that "the ILP grew from bottom up".1 From what little evidence has been available, it has been argued that the ILP was essentially a provincial party, which was created from the fusion of local political groups concentrated mainly on an axis lying across the North of England. An early report from the General Secretary of the party described Lancashire and Yorkshire as the strongholds of the movement, and subsequent historical accounts have supported this view.2 The evidence falls into three categories. In the first place labour historians have often relied on the sparse and often imperfect memoirs of early labour and socialist leaders. While the central figures of the movement have been reticent in their memoirs, very little literature of any kind has emerged from among the ordinary members of the party, and as a result this has often been a poor source. The official papers of the ILP have been generally more satisfactory. The in- evitable gaps in the annual reports of the party can be filled to some extent from party newspapers, both local and national. There is a formality, nevertheless, about official transactions which reduces their value. Minute books reveal little about the members. Finally, it is possible to cull some information from a miscellany of other sources; newspapers, electoral statistics, parliamentary debates and reports, and sometimes the memoirs of individuals whose connection 1 "Homage to Tom Maguire", in: Essays in Labour History, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Inscribed 6 (2).Pdf
    Inscribed6 CONTENTS 1 1. AVIATION 33 2. MILITARY 59 3. NAVAL 67 4. ROYALTY, POLITICIANS, AND OTHER PUBLIC FIGURES 180 5. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 195 6. HIGH LATITUDES, INCLUDING THE POLES 206 7. MOUNTAINEERING 211 8. SPACE EXPLORATION 214 9. GENERAL TRAVEL SECTION 1. AVIATION including books from the libraries of Douglas Bader and “Laddie” Lucas. 1. [AITKEN (Group Captain Sir Max)]. LARIOS (Captain José, Duke of Lerma). Combat over Spain. Memoirs of a Nationalist Fighter Pilot 1936–1939. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition. 8vo., cloth, pictorial dust jacket. London, Neville Spearman. nd (1966). £80 A presentation copy, inscribed on the half title page ‘To Group Captain Sir Max AitkenDFC. DSO. Let us pray that the high ideals we fought for, with such fervent enthusiasm and sacrifice, may never be allowed to perish or be forgotten. With my warmest regards. Pepito Lerma. May 1968’. From the dust jacket: ‘“Combat over Spain” is one of the few first-hand accounts of the Spanish Civil War, and is the only one published in England to be written from the Nationalist point of view’. Lerma was a bomber and fighter pilot for the duration of the war, flying 278 missions. Aitken, the son of Lord Beaverbrook, joined the RAFVR in 1935, and flew Blenheims and Hurricanes, shooting down 14 enemy aircraft. Dust jacket just creased at the head and tail of the spine. A formidable Vic formation – Bader, Deere, Malan. 2. [BADER (Group Captain Douglas)]. DEERE (Group Captain Alan C.) DOWDING Air Chief Marshal, Lord), foreword. Nine Lives. Portrait frontispiece, illustrations. First edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewpoint: Jeremy Corbyn, the Plp and Historical Visions of the Labour Party
    VIEWPOINT: JEREMY CORBYN, THE PLP AND HISTORICAL VISIONS OF THE LABOUR PARTY Matt Dawson The re-election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour Party has demonstrated the fundamental split between two visions of the party. One vision, from Corbyn and his supporters, sees Labour as both parliamentary party and movement in which power rests with the members seeking to enact radical change. It would be crass to see this, as many of Corbyn’s opponents do, as a social movement beyond parliament not interested in government, but it is a view that in a party of campaigning, protesting and winning powerpolicies should not be compromised for the sake of parliamentary convenience/due to corporate pressure. AsHilary Wainwright has put it, a party with parliamentary representation but not one committed to parliamentarism. The second vision, held by much of the PLP is that Labour is a parliamentary movement. It exists to elect MPs who then, being Labour MPs, will implement socialist/social democratic measures which are in the interest of the nation. Any impediment to electing MPs is an impediment to Labour; a leader who cannot command the allegiance of their MPs is therefore not able to lead a parliamentary party. This was indicated by Owen Smith’s key claim, whether tactical or not, that the leadership contest didn’t concern a difference of policy (with the exception of a second EU referendum) but of electability. Smith, at least initially, presented himself as like Corbyn, but ‘electable’. The question of whether the shadow cabinet should be elected by MPs, or by members, is a further example of this dividing line.
    [Show full text]
  • Brick Lane Born: Exhibition and Events
    November 2016 Brick Lane Born: Exhibition and Events Gilbert & George contemplate one of Raju's photographs at the launch of Brick Lane Born Our main exhibition, on show until 7 January is Brick Lane Born, a display of over forty photographs taken in the mid-1980s by Raju Vaidyanathan depicting his neighbourhood and friends in and around Brick Lane. After a feature on ITV London News, the exhibition launched with a bang on 20 October with over a hundred visitors including Gilbert and George (pictured), a lively discussion and an amazing joyous atmosphere. Comments in the Visitors Book so far read: "Fascinating and absorbing. Raju's words and pictures are brilliant. Thank you." "Excellent photos and a story very similar to that of Vivian Maier." "What a fascinating and very special exhibition. The sharpness and range of photographs is impressive and I am delighted to be here." "What a brilliant historical testimony to a Brick Lane no longer in existence. Beautiful." "Just caught this on TV last night and spent over an hour going through it. Excellent B&W photos." One launch attendee unexpectedly found a portrait of her late father in the exhibition and was overjoyed, not least because her children have never seen a photo of their grandfather during that period. Raju's photos and the wonderful stories told in his captions continue to evoke strong memories for people who remember the Spitalfields of the 1980s, as well as fascination in those who weren't there. An additional event has been added to the programme- see below for details.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussing What Prime Ministers Are For
    Discussing what Prime Ministers are for PETER HENNESSY New Labour has a lot to answer for on this front. They On 13 October 2014, Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield FBA, had seen what the press was doing to John Major from Attlee Professor of Contemporary British History at Queen Black Wednesday onwards – relentless attacks on him, Mary, University of London, delivered the first British which bothered him deeply.1 And they were determined Academy Lecture in Politics and Government, on ‘What that this wouldn’t happen to them. So they went into are Prime Ministers for?’ A video recording of the lecture the business of creating permanent rebuttal capabilities. and an article published in the Journal of the British Academy If somebody said something offensive about the can be found via www.britishacademy.ac.uk/events/2014/ Government on the Today programme, they would make every effort to put it right by the World at One. They went The following article contains edited extracts from the into this kind of mania of permanent rebuttal, which question and answer session that followed the lecture. means that you don’t have time to reflect before reacting to events. It’s arguable now that, if the Government doesn’t Do we expect Prime Ministers to do too much? react to events immediately, other people’s versions of breaking stories (circulating through social media etc.) I think it was 1977 when the Procedure Committee in will make the pace, and it won’t be able to get back on the House of Commons wanted the Prime Minister to be top of an issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labour Party Is More Than the Shadow Cabinet, and Corbyn Must Learn to Engage with It
    The Labour Party is more than the shadow cabinet, and Corbyn must learn to engage with it blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-labour-party-is-more-than-the-shadow-cabinet/ 1/11/2016 The three-day reshuffle of the shadow cabinet might have helped Jeremy Corbyn stamp his mark on the party but he needs to do more to ensure his leadership lasts, writes Eunice Goes. She explains the Labour leader must engage with all groups that have historically made up the party, while his rhetoric should focus more on policies that resonate with the public. Doing so will require a stronger vision of what he means by ‘new politics’ and, crucially, a better communications strategy. By Westminster standards Labour’s shadow cabinet reshuffle was ‘shambolic’ and had the key ingredients of a ‘pantomime’. At least, it was in those terms that it was described by a large number of Labour politicians and Westminster watchers. It certainly wasn’t slick, or edifying. Taking the best of a week to complete a modest shadow cabinet reshuffle was revealing of the limited authority the leader Jeremy Corbyn has over the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP). Against the wishes of the Labour leader, the Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn and the Shadow Chief Whip Rosie Winterton kept their posts. However, Corbyn was able to assert his authority in other ways. He moved the pro-Trident Maria Eagle from Defence and appointed the anti-Trident Emily Thornberry to the post. He also imposed some ground rules on Hillary Benn and got rid of Michael Dugher and Pat McFadden on the grounds of disloyalty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Attlee Governments
    Vic07 10/15/03 2:11 PM Page 159 Chapter 7 The Attlee governments The election of a majority Labour government in 1945 generated great excitement on the left. Hugh Dalton described how ‘That first sensa- tion, tingling and triumphant, was of a new society to be built. There was exhilaration among us, joy and hope, determination and confi- dence. We felt exalted, dedication, walking on air, walking with destiny.’1 Dalton followed this by aiding Herbert Morrison in an attempt to replace Attlee as leader of the PLP.2 This was foiled by the bulky protection of Bevin, outraged at their plotting and disloyalty. Bevin apparently hated Morrison, and thought of him as ‘a scheming little bastard’.3 Certainly he thought Morrison’s conduct in the past had been ‘devious and unreliable’.4 It was to be particularly irksome for Bevin that it was Morrison who eventually replaced him as Foreign Secretary in 1951. The Attlee government not only generated great excitement on the left at the time, but since has also attracted more attention from academics than any other period of Labour history. Foreign policy is a case in point. The foreign policy of the Attlee government is attractive to study because it spans so many politically and historically significant issues. To start with, this period was unique in that it was the first time that there was a majority Labour government in British political history, with a clear mandate and programme of reform. Whereas the two minority Labour governments of the inter-war period had had to rely on support from the Liberals to pass legislation, this time Labour had power as well as office.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Nostalgia, Progressive Patriotism and Labour's 'English Problem'
    Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour©s ©English problem© Article (Accepted Version) Robinson, Emily (2016) Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem'. Political Studies Review, 14 (3). pp. 378-387. ISSN 1478-9299 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61679/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Author’s Post-Print Copy Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem' Emily Robinson, University of Sussex ABSTRACT ‘Progressive patriots’ have long argued that Englishness can form the basis of a transformative political project, whether based on an historic tradition of resistance to state power or an open and cosmopolitan identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and Europe
    Britain and Europe ROBERT COOPER Forty years after Britain joined Europe both have changed, mostly for the better. This story does not, however, begin in 1972 when the negotiations finished and were ratified by parliament, nor in 1973 when the UK took its place at the Council table as a full member, but ten years before with the first British application and the veto by General de Gaulle. Sometimes, going further back still, it is suggested that if Ernest Bevin’s ideas for West European cooperation had been pursued,1 or if Britain had decided to join talks on the Schuman Plan,2 or to take the Spaak Committee seriously,3 things might have been different. But the truth is there was no Robert Schuman or Jean Monnet in Britain, and no readiness to think in radically new terms. Had the UK been present at the negotiations that led to the European Coal and Steel Community, the outcome for Britain would probably still have been the same, precisely because the vision was lacking. The decision on the Schuman Plan was a close-run thing—the idea of planning for heavy industry being in accordance with the ideas of the Labour government. But British ideas were very different from those of the French or the Americans, who were thinking in terms of supranational bodies—indeed, for Monnet this was a cardinal point. His approach was supported by the Benelux countries, which were already setting up their own customs union. Bevin had an ambition to lead Europe, but it is not clear where he wanted to take it.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zoab Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 46106 7619623
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) dr section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages, This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Fels of 'Philadelphia and London
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Joseph Fels of 'Philadelphia and London OSEPH FELS, maker of Fels-Naptha soap, told a select gathering of Chicago's business and civic leaders in 1910: "We cannot get J rich under present conditions without robbing somebody. I have done it, you are doing it, and I am still doing it. But I propose to spend the damnable money to wipe out the system by which I made it. If any of you have the courage to do the same thing, for God's sake let us cross hands"'1 Fels had already warned his listeners that "the mere making of money" must never become a businessman's most vital concern. Now, however, he was attacking the very founda- tions of the economic order upon which depended the material well- being of all who were present, and appealing for their help in the bargain. That an industrialist of his prominence should have behaved so strangely was perhaps remarkable enough, but that his audience undoubtedly expected him to do so was stranger still. His reputation had obviously preceded him to Chicago. It was well known that businessman and reformer had been combined in Joseph Fels to an astonishing degree. Note: Grateful acknowledgement is due the American Philosophical Society and Bryn Mawr College for financial aid, and Millicent H. Dudden and Rachel Mclntyre Dach for editorial assistance. 1 Speech of Joseph Fels before the City Club of Chicago, I11., Mar. 9, 1910, City Club Bulletin, III (Mar. 16, 1910), 244. 143 144 ARTHUR P. DUDDEN April Joseph Fels was born in 1854 at Halifax Court House, Halifax County, Virginia.2 He was the fourth of seven children.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Contributors
    129 Cercles 37 (2020) Notes on Contributors The Right Honourable Gordon Brown was Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Leader of the Labour Party from 2007 to 2010. Prior to that he served as Chancellor of the Exchequer for ten years. He was educated at the University of Edinburgh and was Member of Parliament for Kirkaldy and Cowdenbeath for thirty-two years. John Campbell is a freelance historian and political biographer. His first book, Lloyd George : The Goat in the Wilderness, published in 1977, arose out of Paul Addison 's final-year honours course on British politics between the wars and was essentially his Ph.D thesis, supervised by Paul and examined by A.J.P. Taylor. Since then he has written full-scale biographies of F.E. Smith (1983), Aneurin Bevan (Nye Bevan and the Mirage of British Socialism, 1987), Edward Heath (Winner of the 1994 NCR Book Award for Non-Fiction), Margaret Thatcher (The Grocer's Daughter, 2000, and The Iron Lady, 2003), and Roy Jenkins (A Well-Rounded Life, 2014), as well as If Love Were All ... The Story of Frances Stevenson and David Lloyd George (2006) and Pistols at Dawn : Two Hundred Years of Political Rivalry from Pitt and Fox to Blair and Brown (2009) and numerous book reviews and other articles and essays in various publications over the years. David Freeman is editor of Finest Hour, the journal of the International Churchill Society. He teaches history at California State University, Fullerton. In addition to having published contributions by Paul Addison in Finest Hour, he once had the privilege of driving Addison across a wide stretch of Texas.
    [Show full text]