Trademarking and Licensing for Transit Providers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trademarking and Licensing for Transit Providers 3 TRADEMARKING AND LICENSING FOR TRANSIT PROVIDERS By Radhika Raju and Jaylene Sarracino Raju & Sarracino, L.L.C. Washington, DC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN GENERAL INTRODUCTION There are four different types of intellectual property: Transit officials need to understand the basics of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. The trademark protection and how to create revenue by idea of encouraging technological progress is included licensing intellectual property holdings. Prevention of in the U.S. Constitution. Article I, Section 8, reads in misappropriation and loss of control over an agency’s part, “The Congress shall have Power…to promote the trademarks is something of immediate interest to the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for lim- transit industry. An article in the Washington Post ited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right publication, Express, June 7, 2004, illustrates the to their respective writings and discoveries.” trademark issues faced by the Texas Department of Both patent and copyright laws stem from this Transportation when it neglected to register its anti- clause, while trade secret protection arises from the litter slogan “DON'T MESS WITH TEXAS.” It became right of businesses to protect confidential information apparent that the department had missed an opportu- and is state regulated. nity to earn revenue on the licensing of the slogan when Trademark law arises from the government’s author- unrelated parties began to print it on T-shirts, caps, ity to regulate commerce among the states and with and other souvenir items. Several years later, the de- foreign nations. In the U.S. Constitution, Article I, Sec- partment obtained a registration with the United tion 3, the “Commerce Clause” grants authority for States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or regulating commerce and reads in part, “To regulate Trademark Office) and began to protect its slogan by Commerce with foreign nations and among the several sending the infringers “cease and desist” letters that States….” Federal jurisdiction over trademarks only warned of litigation if they did not stop the unauthor- applies to marks used in interstate commerce. The rea- ized use of the slogan. son why many states also register trademarks is to By perfecting its rights by filing for, and later ob- have jurisdiction over intra-state commerce. taining, a federal trademark registration and by de- A trademark can be any word, name, symbol, or de- fending against misuse by third parties, the Texas De- vice, or combination of these, used or intended to be partment of Transportation created the foundation for a used, in commerce. Trademarks indicate the source of revenue asset stream. goods or services.1 A service mark similarly can be any The purpose of this report is to guide the intellectual word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination of property novice through the process of protecting these that are used or intended to be used in commerce. trademark assets. The report begins with an overview Trademark2 registrations are indefinitely renewable of the statutory and regulatory framework that allows and in essence may last forever, as long as the trade- for trademark ownership. This is followed by instruc- mark is continually in use to identify goods in com- tions on how to prepare, file, and prosecute a trademark merce. application at the federal level. This includes details for Trademarks have three very important functions: to electronic filing, references to forms, examples of verbi- protect the trademark owner’s efforts to associate the age, and information on government fees. Also pre- trademark with goodwill and reputation, to protect con- sented are overviews regarding post-registration con- sumers from confusion as to the source of goods that cerns and registering trademarks at the state level. they purchase, and to indicate that all goods sold under Details on current USPTO policy and procedures along the same mark have the same level of quality. Trade- with practical advice are interspersed throughout the marks do not need to be just words. They can be any- report. For completeness, shorter sections explain the thing that identifies source. For example, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), Trademark Office organization, and international (Madrid Protocol) 1. Letters, such as VTA;3 filings. An entire section explains licensing of trade- mark assets and relevant provisions to include in a li- censing agreement. The report concludes with an ap- pendix of online resources. 1 The term “goods” will encompass both goods and services. 2 The term “trademark” or “mark” will encompass both trademarks and service marks. 3 U.S. Reg. No. 2168418. Registrant: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. Services: transportation of passen- 4 2. Numbers, such as 123 TRANSIT; Descriptive marks are terms that identify a purpose, 3. Slogans, such as DO THE RIDE THING!;4 function, characteristic, or feature of the goods. For instance, the mark SAN DIEGO TRANSIT6 is descrip- tive for transit services because the mark immediately 4. Designs, such as describes the location and the services. Descriptive terms are registrable if the applicant can show that the term has acquired distinctiveness, meaning that con- 5. Color, such as the pink color of Owens Corning’s sumers recognize the mark as identifying a single insulation; source. The more descriptive the term, the greater the 6. Product shape or product container shapes, such as evidence the applicant must proffer to show acquired a bus ticket shaped like a bus; distinctiveness. 7. Building appearances, such as the shape of a Pizza Generic terms are basically the very name of the Hut roof; goods and cannot ever acquire distinctiveness and func- 8. Sounds, such as the chimes used by NBC for tion as trademarks and are therefore unregistrable. For broadcasting; and example, SHOE for selling shoes. Generic terms must 9. Fragrance, such as the smell of plumeria blossom remain in the public domain because they tell the con- for thread. sumer what the goods are and cannot indicate source. For example, GAS STATION for gasoline stations or LANHAM ACT MOTOR OIL for motor oil would never be allowed. If a registered trademark is not properly policed, it can be- 5 The Lanham Act provides the legal framework for come generic and is therefore no longer protectable un- seeking a federal registration for a trademark at the der the Lanham Act. For instance, ASPIRIN was once a USPTO and describes the penalties for trademark in- registered trademark, but now has become the generic fringement. The Trademark Manual of Examining Pro- name for a certain type of painkiller. Similarly, cedure (TMEP), used by both USPTO application ex- SUPERGLUE was a registered mark but has now be- aminers and private trademark practitioners, is the come generic for a certain type of glue. most comprehensive guidance for preparing, prosecut- ing, and maintaining a trademark application or regis- TYPES OF MARKS tration at the USPTO. It is an invaluable source for responding to “Office Actions” or official correspondence Marks at the Trademark Office fall into three differ- from the USPTO. It is available and searchable online ent categories. First, trademarks, as discussed above, at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac/tmep/. can be words, letters, designs, combinations of words or letters, color, product shape, sounds, etc., and indicate SPECTRUM OF MARKS that the goods come from a particular source. Second, trademarks can be collective marks, used by Marks are either inherently distinctive or non- the members of a cooperative, an association, or other inherently distinctive. Inherently distinctive marks are collective groups to indicate that particular goods come marks that are fanciful or coined, arbitrary or sugges- from a member of the applicant’s organization or that tive. Non-inherently distinctive marks include descrip- the user of the mark is a member of the applicant’s or- tive marks, generic terms, name marks, and geographic ganization, such as the mark INTERNATIONAL marks. BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS for the transporta- Fanciful or coined marks are terms that have no tion, maintenance, and handling labor union.7 meaning but to function as a trademark and indicate Third, trademarks can also be certification marks origin of goods. Examples include marks like PEPSI for used by persons other than an owner to certify: soda pop, EXXON for gas station services, and KODAK for cameras. Arbitrary marks are terms that are com- 1. Regional or other origin of the goods or services; mon words but are not related to the goods. For exam- 2. Material, mode of manufacture, quality, accuracy, or ple, APPLE for computers and PUMA for shoes. Sug- other characteristics of the goods or services; gestive marks suggest a quality, feature, or 3. That the work or labor on the goods or services was characteristic of the goods, but require imagination or performed by members of a union or other organization. an additional step in logic to determine what the mark conveys about the goods. An example is EVEREADY for The purpose of certification marks is to inform pur- batteries. chasers that the goods of a person possess certain char- acteristics or meet certain qualifications or standards gers and their incidental baggage by bus, van, rail, and other established by another person. The message conveyed multi-passenger ground vehicles. 4 U.S. Reg. No. 2338108. Registrant: Des Moines Metropoli- tan Transit Authority. Services: transportation of passengers 6 U.S. Reg. No. 2180474. Registrant: San Diego Metropolitan by bus. Transit Development Board. Services: transportation of pas- 5 Pub. L. No. 79-489, 60 Stat. 427 (1946) (current version at sengers by means of bus. 15 U.S.C. § 1051 (2005)). 7 U.S. Reg. No. 1994996. 5 by a certification mark is that the goods have been ex- initial territory regarding use and intent is by filing a amined, tested, inspected, or in some way approved U.S.
Recommended publications
  • NYU School of Law Outline: Trademarks, Barton Beebe
    NYU School of Law Outline: Trademarks, Barton Beebe Will Frank (Class of 2011) Fall Semester, 2009 Contents 1 Introduction to Trademark and Unfair Competition Law 3 1.1 Sources and Nature of Rights . 4 1.2 The Nature of Unfair Competition Law . 4 1.3 Purposes of Trademark Law . 4 1.4 The Lanham Act . 5 2 Distinctiveness 6 2.1 The Spectrum of Distinctiveness . 7 2.2 Descriptiveness and Secondary Meaning . 7 2.3 Generic Terms . 8 2.4 Distinctiveness of Nonverbal Identifiers (Logos, Packages, Prod- uct Design, Colors) . 9 2.4.1 Different Tests/Standards? . 9 2.4.2 Expanding the Types of Nonverbal Marks . 9 2.4.3 The Design/Packaging Distinction . 10 2.4.4 Trade Dress Protection After Wal-Mart . 10 2.5 The Edge of Protection: Subject Matter Exclusions? . 12 2.5.1 Exotic Source-Identifiers . 12 2.6 Review . 12 3 Functionality 13 3.1 The Concept . 14 3.2 The Scope of the Doctrine . 15 3.3 The Modern Approach . 15 3.4 Post-TrafFix Devices Applications . 17 4 Use 18 4.1 As a Jurisdictional Prerequisite . 18 4.2 As a Prerequisite for Acquiring Rights . 18 4.2.1 Actual Use . 18 4.2.2 Constructive Use . 19 1 4.3 \Surrogate" Uses . 20 4.3.1 By Affiliates . 20 4.4 The Public as Surrogate . 20 4.5 Loss of Rights . 21 4.5.1 Abandonment Through Non-Use . 21 4.5.2 Abandonment Through Failure to Control Use . 21 5 Registration 22 5.1 The Registration Process . 22 5.1.1 Overview .
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property Outlook: Cases and Trends to Follow in 2012
    February 2012 Intellectual Property Outlook: Cases and Trends to Follow in 2012 BY ROBERT M. MASTERS, TAD RICHMAN, & LISA LEUNG I. Introduction In the coming year, we anticipate a series of events and decisions with varying degrees of impact on intellectual property law in the United States and, in turn, the way we advise our clients. This article highlights cases we are monitoring that present, in our view, significant issues relating to various aspects of intellectual property law. Most of these cases are pending appeal at some level, and each has the potential for considerable impact on the landscape of U.S. intellectual property law. A small number of recently decided cases have also been selected for inclusion in this discussion, as it remains to be seen precisely how these decisions will play out in practice over the coming year. Lastly, we take a look at continuing trends in the intellectual property marketplace and review key legislation, including what to expect from the recently enacted America Invents Act. II. Cases to Watch in 2012 A. The Scope of Patentable Subject Matter 1. Medical Diagnostic and Treatment Methods Post-Bilski The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mayo Collaborative Svcs. v. Prometheus Labs., Inc., No. 10-1150, on December 7, 2011. This is not the first time the Supreme Court has taken on the question of the validity of Prometheus’s asserted method claims. As before, Mayo challenges the Federal Circuit’s holding that Prometheus’s method claims recite patentable subject matter under §101. Unlike before, Mayo’s appeal now derives from a post-Bilski decision below.1 Prometheus is the sole and exclusive licensee of two patents claiming methods for determining the optimal dosage of thiopurine drugs used to treat certain autoimmune diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Basis Technology Unicode対応ライブラリ スペックシート 文字コード その他の名称 Adobe-Standard-Encoding A
    Basis Technology Unicode対応ライブラリ スペックシート 文字コード その他の名称 Adobe-Standard-Encoding Adobe-Symbol-Encoding csHPPSMath Adobe-Zapf-Dingbats-Encoding csZapfDingbats Arabic ISO-8859-6, csISOLatinArabic, iso-ir-127, ECMA-114, ASMO-708 ASCII US-ASCII, ANSI_X3.4-1968, iso-ir-6, ANSI_X3.4-1986, ISO646-US, us, IBM367, csASCI big-endian ISO-10646-UCS-2, BigEndian, 68k, PowerPC, Mac, Macintosh Big5 csBig5, cn-big5, x-x-big5 Big5Plus Big5+, csBig5Plus BMP ISO-10646-UCS-2, BMPstring CCSID-1027 csCCSID1027, IBM1027 CCSID-1047 csCCSID1047, IBM1047 CCSID-290 csCCSID290, CCSID290, IBM290 CCSID-300 csCCSID300, CCSID300, IBM300 CCSID-930 csCCSID930, CCSID930, IBM930 CCSID-935 csCCSID935, CCSID935, IBM935 CCSID-937 csCCSID937, CCSID937, IBM937 CCSID-939 csCCSID939, CCSID939, IBM939 CCSID-942 csCCSID942, CCSID942, IBM942 ChineseAutoDetect csChineseAutoDetect: Candidate encodings: GB2312, Big5, GB18030, UTF32:UTF8, UCS2, UTF32 EUC-H, csCNS11643EUC, EUC-TW, TW-EUC, H-EUC, CNS-11643-1992, EUC-H-1992, csCNS11643-1992-EUC, EUC-TW-1992, CNS-11643 TW-EUC-1992, H-EUC-1992 CNS-11643-1986 EUC-H-1986, csCNS11643_1986_EUC, EUC-TW-1986, TW-EUC-1986, H-EUC-1986 CP10000 csCP10000, windows-10000 CP10001 csCP10001, windows-10001 CP10002 csCP10002, windows-10002 CP10003 csCP10003, windows-10003 CP10004 csCP10004, windows-10004 CP10005 csCP10005, windows-10005 CP10006 csCP10006, windows-10006 CP10007 csCP10007, windows-10007 CP10008 csCP10008, windows-10008 CP10010 csCP10010, windows-10010 CP10017 csCP10017, windows-10017 CP10029 csCP10029, windows-10029 CP10079 csCP10079, windows-10079
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 3 8,UNBELIEVABLE60 HE SAYS4
    L 3 Qotatio M, A, Pnt, S B, O, L L (U), Ssh Now learn the following additional punctuation signs: apostrophe ’ [or] ' ' (dot 3) opening one-cell (non-specific) quotation mark 8 (dots 236) closing one-cell (non-specific) quotation mark 0 (dots 356) opening single quotation mark ‘ [or] ' ,8 (dots 6, 236) closing single quotation mark ’ [or] ' ,0 (dots 6, 356) opening parenthesis ( "< (dots 5, 126) closing parenthesis ) "> (dots 5, 345) opening square bracket [ .< (dots 46, 126) (dots 46, 345) closing square bracket ] .> 3.1 S D Qotatio M [UEB §7.6] In braille, there are several different symbols to represent the various types of print quotation marks (additional information about quotation marks will be studied in Lesson 16). In most cases, the opening and clo one- (-ecific) tatio marks should be used to represent the primary or outer quotation marks in the text, and the two- cell opening and closing single quotation marks should represent the inner quotation marks. Examples: "Unbelievable!" he says. 8,BEIEABE60 HE A4 "I only wrote 'come home soon'," he claims. 3 - 1 8,I E ,8CE HE ,010 HE CAI4 3.2 Arop Follow print for the use of apostrophes. Example: "Tell 'em Sam's favorite music is new—1990's too old." 8,E 'E ,A' FAIE IC I E,-#AIIJ' D40 3.2 A api lette. A capital indicator is always placed immediately before the letter to which it applies. Therefore, if an apostrophe comes before a capital letter in print, the apostrophe is brailled before the capital indicator. Example: "'Twas a brilliant plan," says Dan O'Reilly.
    [Show full text]
  • HTML URL Encoding
    HHTTMMLL UURRLL EENNCCOODDIINNGG http://www.tutorialspoint.com/html/html_url_encoding.htm Copyright © tutorialspoint.com URL encoding is the practice of translating unprintable characters or characters with special meaning within URLs to a representation that is unambiguous and universally accepted by web browsers and servers. These characters include: ASCII control characters - Unprintable characters typically used for output control. Character ranges 00-1F hex 0 − 31decimal and 7F 127decimal. A complete encoding table is given below. Non-ASCII control characters - These are characters beyond the ASCII character set of 128 characters. This range is part of the ISO-Latin character set and includes the entire "top half" of the ISO-Latin set 80-FF hex 128 − 255decimal. A complete encoding table is given below. Reserved characters - These are special characters such as the dollar sign, ampersand, plus, common, forward slash, colon, semi-colon, equals sign, question mark, and "at" symbol. All of these can have different meanings inside a URL so need to be encoded. A complete encoding table is given below. Unsafe characters - These are space, quotation marks, less than symbol, greater than symbol, pound character, percent character, Left Curly Brace, Right Curly Brace , Pipe, Backslash, Caret, Tilde, Left Square Bracket , Right Square Bracket, Grave Accent. These character present the possibility of being misunderstood within URLs for various reasons. These characters should also always be encoded. A complete encoding table is given below. The encoding notation replaces the desired character with three characters: a percent sign and two hexadecimal digits that correspond to the position of the character in the ASCII character set.
    [Show full text]
  • AIX Globalization
    AIX Version 7.1 AIX globalization IBM Note Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in “Notices” on page 233 . This edition applies to AIX Version 7.1 and to all subsequent releases and modifications until otherwise indicated in new editions. © Copyright International Business Machines Corporation 2010, 2018. US Government Users Restricted Rights – Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Contents About this document............................................................................................vii Highlighting.................................................................................................................................................vii Case-sensitivity in AIX................................................................................................................................vii ISO 9000.....................................................................................................................................................vii AIX globalization...................................................................................................1 What's new...................................................................................................................................................1 Separation of messages from programs..................................................................................................... 1 Conversion between code sets.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Report of Murray Wilson
    In the Arbitration under the Arbitration Rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law and the North American Free Trade Agreement (Case No. UNCT/14/2) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY Claimant v. GOVERNMENTOFCANADA Respondent EXPERT REPORT OF MURRA Y WILSON l. INTRODUCTION l. M y name is Murray Wilson and I reside in the City of Ottawa, Ontario. 2. I confirm that I have no relationship to Eli Lilly and Company or any of its affiliates. 3. I worked for the Canadian Patent Office for o ver 3 5 years as a patent examiner and in various other capacities such as the acting Chair of the Patent Appeal Board. Based upon that experience, I believe that 1 am qualified to provide the factual information and opinions set out below. 4. During my 35 year career with the Canadian Patent Office I examined and reviewed thousands of patent applications, including pharmaceutical patents. I have extensive experience and in-depth knowledge about the Canadian Patent Office practice relating to the examination and granting of patents during the time period the Strattera and Zyprexa patent applications were examined and the patents granted (patent 2,209,735 and patent 2,041,113, respectively ). 5. After graduating from Carleton University in 1971 with a Bachelor ofMechanical Engineering Degree, I started working in the Canadian Patent Office in 1971 as a patent examiner in the Mechanical Division, examining patent applications in the material handling arts. 6. In 1981, I became a senior patent examiner with responsibilities for examining patent applications that were filed in French.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Japanese Patent Prosecution
    The ‘Endless Loop’ of Japanese Patent Prosecution By Samson Helfgott and Paula E. Hopkins Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP First published in the May 2006 issue of World Intellectual Property Report Commentary The ‘Endless Loop’ of Japanese Patent Prosecution By Samson Helfgott and Paula E.Hopkins.Samson Helfgott During the course of the appeal trial, the Trial Examiners are is a Partner and Director of Patents, and Paula E. Hopkins is allowed to find a new reason and/or new prior art to reject the an associate in the IP Department of Katten Muchin patent application other than those stipulated in the decision of the Rosenman LLP, New York. The authors can be contacted examiner (Section 150, subsection 1 and Section 153, subsection by e-mail at: [email protected] and 1). In such case, the Board has to notify the new reason and/or [email protected] prior art to the applicant and allow the applicant to make counter-arguments against that reason and/or prior art before Patent prosecution in any patent system has its normal course of issuance of the decision of the Board (Section 159, subsection 2 delays. In significant cases, especially when broad claims are and Section 50). Accordingly, by way of example, although the being prosecuted, even more time may be required until a examiner may have only rejected the claim based upon certain resolution of the patent issues is reached. However, within the sections, such as lack of novelty, the Board of Trial Examiners can Japanese Patent System peculiarities within the law make such reject those claims for other reasons, such as indefiniteness, lack delays indefinite, resulting in an “endless loop” of prosecution of support, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Punctuation Range: 2E00–2E7F
    Supplemental Punctuation Range: 2E00–2E7F This file contains an excerpt from the character code tables and list of character names for The Unicode Standard, Version 14.0 This file may be changed at any time without notice to reflect errata or other updates to the Unicode Standard. See https://www.unicode.org/errata/ for an up-to-date list of errata. See https://www.unicode.org/charts/ for access to a complete list of the latest character code charts. See https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-14.0/ for charts showing only the characters added in Unicode 14.0. See https://www.unicode.org/Public/14.0.0/charts/ for a complete archived file of character code charts for Unicode 14.0. Disclaimer These charts are provided as the online reference to the character contents of the Unicode Standard, Version 14.0 but do not provide all the information needed to fully support individual scripts using the Unicode Standard. For a complete understanding of the use of the characters contained in this file, please consult the appropriate sections of The Unicode Standard, Version 14.0, online at https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/, as well as Unicode Standard Annexes #9, #11, #14, #15, #24, #29, #31, #34, #38, #41, #42, #44, #45, and #50, the other Unicode Technical Reports and Standards, and the Unicode Character Database, which are available online. See https://www.unicode.org/ucd/ and https://www.unicode.org/reports/ A thorough understanding of the information contained in these additional sources is required for a successful implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Approved Special Characters
    List of Approved Special Characters The following list represents the Graduate Division's approved character list for display of dissertation titles in the Hooding Booklet. Please note these characters will not display when your dissertation is published on ProQuest's site. To insert a special character, simply hold the ALT key on your keyboard and enter in the corresponding code. This is only for entering in a special character for your title or your name. The abstract section has different requirements. See abstract for more details. Special Character Alt+ Description 0032 Space ! 0033 Exclamation mark '" 0034 Double quotes (or speech marks) # 0035 Number $ 0036 Dollar % 0037 Procenttecken & 0038 Ampersand '' 0039 Single quote ( 0040 Open parenthesis (or open bracket) ) 0041 Close parenthesis (or close bracket) * 0042 Asterisk + 0043 Plus , 0044 Comma ‐ 0045 Hyphen . 0046 Period, dot or full stop / 0047 Slash or divide 0 0048 Zero 1 0049 One 2 0050 Two 3 0051 Three 4 0052 Four 5 0053 Five 6 0054 Six 7 0055 Seven 8 0056 Eight 9 0057 Nine : 0058 Colon ; 0059 Semicolon < 0060 Less than (or open angled bracket) = 0061 Equals > 0062 Greater than (or close angled bracket) ? 0063 Question mark @ 0064 At symbol A 0065 Uppercase A B 0066 Uppercase B C 0067 Uppercase C D 0068 Uppercase D E 0069 Uppercase E List of Approved Special Characters F 0070 Uppercase F G 0071 Uppercase G H 0072 Uppercase H I 0073 Uppercase I J 0074 Uppercase J K 0075 Uppercase K L 0076 Uppercase L M 0077 Uppercase M N 0078 Uppercase N O 0079 Uppercase O P 0080 Uppercase
    [Show full text]
  • Patenting: a Guidebook for Patenting in a Post-America Invents Act World
    Foley Hoag eBook PATENTING: A Guidebook For Patenting in a Post-America Invents Act World by Beth E. Arnold PATENTING: A GUIDEBOOK FOR PATENTING IN A POST-AMERICA INVENTS ACT WORLD IN A POST-AMERICA A GUIDEBOOK FOR PATENTING PATENTING: 1 Contents Preface ............................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 What Is a Patent? ..........................................................................................2 Chapter 2 What Is Potentially Patentable? ................................................................5 Chapter 3 What Is Not Patentable? .............................................................................7 Chapter 4 How Is a Patent Obtained? .......................................................................16 Chapter 5 What Should You Do Before Filing a Patent Application? ...............25 Chapter 6 What Shouldn’t You Do Before Filing a Patent Application? ...........28 Chapter 7 How Are Foreign Patents Obtained? .....................................................29 Chapter 8 Who Is an Inventor on a Patent? ............................................................33 Chapter 9 Who Owns the Patent? ..............................................................................35 Chapter 10 How Long Is a Patent in Effect? .............................................................39 About Foley Hoag ...............................................................................................42 About the Author: Beth E. Arnold .........................................................................43
    [Show full text]
  • Characters for Classical Latin
    Characters for Classical Latin David J. Perry version 13, 2 July 2020 Introduction The purpose of this document is to identify all characters of interest to those who work with Classical Latin, no matter how rare. Epigraphers will want many of these, but I want to collect any character that is needed in any context. Those that are already available in Unicode will be so identified; those that may be available can be debated; and those that are clearly absent and should be proposed can be proposed; and those that are so rare as to be unencodable will be known. If you have any suggestions for additional characters or reactions to the suggestions made here, please email me at [email protected] . No matter how rare, let’s get all possible characters on this list. Version 6 of this document has been updated to reflect the many characters of interest to Latinists encoded as of Unicode version 13.0. Characters are indicated by their Unicode value, a hexadecimal number, and their name printed IN SMALL CAPITALS. Unicode values may be preceded by U+ to set them off from surrounding text. Combining diacritics are printed over a dotted cir- cle ◌ to show that they are intended to be used over a base character. For more basic information about Unicode, see the website of The Unicode Consortium, http://www.unicode.org/ or my book cited below. Please note that abbreviations constructed with lines above or through existing let- ters are not considered separate characters except in unusual circumstances, nor are the space-saving ligatures found in Latin inscriptions unless they have a unique grammatical or phonemic function (which they normally don’t).
    [Show full text]