DOCSLIB.ORG

2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan JRC SCIENCE AND POLICY REPORTS 2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan Technology Descriptions Report EUR 26345 EN Joint Research Centre EUROPEAN COMMISSION Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport Contact: Johan Carlsson Address: Joint Research Centre, 3 Westerduinweg 1755 LE Petten the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +31 224565341 Fax: +31 224565616 http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ This publication is a Scientific and Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre of theE uropean Commission. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC86357 EUR 26345 EN ISBN 978-92-79-34720-7 (pdf) ISBN 978-92-79-34721-4 (print) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) ISSN 1018-5593 (print) doi: 10.2790/99812 (online) doi: 10.2790/9986 (print) Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014 © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Luxembourg 2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) Technology Descriptions TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Wind Power Generation 07 2. Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Generation 16 3. Concentrated Solar Power Generation 22 4. Hydropower 27 5. Geothermal Energy 33 6. Marine Energy 41 7. Carbon Capture And Storage In Power Generation 46 8. Advanced Fossil Fuel Power Generation 54 9. Nuclear Fission Power Generation 62 10. Nuclear Fusion Power Generation 69 11. Bioenergy — Power And Heat Generation 75 12. Biofuels For The Transport Sector 83 13. Hydrogen And Fuel Cells 91 14. Electricity Storage In The Power Sector 99 15. Smart Grids 107 16. Cogeneration Or Combined Heat And Power 114 17. Energy Performance Of Buildings 119 18. Heating And Cooling Technologies 126 19. Heat Pumps 132 20. Energy Efficiency And Co2 Emissions Reduction In Industry 137 20.1 The cement industry 137 20.2 The iron and steel industry 142 20.3 The pulp and paper industry 148 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to gratefully acknowledge the following lists of authors, reviewers and con- tributors to the 2013 Technology Map. Chapter Authors Wind Roberto Lacal-Arantegui Photovoltaic Arnulf Jäger-Waldau Concentrated solar power Arnulf Jäger-Waldau Hydropower Roberto Lacal-Arantegui Geothermal Andrei Bocin-Dumitriu, Bergur Sigfusson Marine Ghassan Zubi, Davide Magagna CHP Johan Carlsson CCS Maria del Mar Perez Fortes Advanced fossil fuel Maria del Mar Perez Fortes Nuclear fission Johan Carlsson Nuclear fusion Ray Moss Smart grids Stavros Lazarou D avid Baxter, Nicolae Scarlat, Jacopo Giuntoli, Bioenergy – power and heat Alberto Moro Monica Padella, Marina Kousoulidou, Biofuels for the transport sector Veljko Vorkapic, Luisa Marelli Hydrogen and fuel cells Marc Steen Electricity storage Andreas Zucker, Roberto Lacal-Arantegui Efficiency in industry José Moya - Cement - Iron and steel - Pulp and paper Energy performance of buildings Hans Bloem Heating and cooling technologies Carmen Moles Heat pumps Carmen Moles Reviewers from other services of the The following external contributors are also European Commission: gratefully acknowledged: Maria Getsiou [Solar PV], Jean-Marie Bemtgen Bertrand de Lamberterie [Iron and steel], Claude and Philipp Troppmann [Iron and steel], Roger Loréa [Cement], Marco Mensink and Jernej Garbil, Marc Deffrennes, Rosa Ciotola [Nuclear Vernik [Pulp and paper], Jean-Luc Delplancke, Fission], Rosa Ciotola, Tomasz Sliwinski, Simon Nikolaos Lymperopoulos, Mirela Atanasiu, Webster [Nuclear Fusion], Jeroen Schuppers Enrique Giron, Guillaume Leduc and Carlos [Carbon Capture and Storage, and Advanced Navas [Hydrogen and fuel cells] Fossil Fuels], Patrick Van Hove [Smart Grids] Agustin Escardino Malva] The Technology Map Editorial Team: Johan Carlsson / Marika Vellei 4 PREAMBLE Background The European Union (EU) is tackling climate The Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET- change, energy supply security and economic Plan) is the technology pillar of the EU’s energy competitiveness through the transformation of and climate policy. It responds to the challenge the energy system, with far-reaching implica- of accelerating the development of low-carbon tions on how we source and produce our ener- technologies, leading to their widespread mar- gy, how we transport and trade it, and how we ket take-up. SETIS, the SET-Plan Information use it. The aim is to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) System, supports the SET-Plan. One of SETIS’s emissions by at least 85 % by 2050 compared regular outputs is the Technology Map, which to the 1990 levels. presents the state of knowledge for low-carbon technologies in the following domains: There is no single energy technology that alone can sustain this transformation. Either • assessment of the state of the art of a wide the energy sources are not sufficiently abun- portfolio of low-carbon energy technologies, dant or they have drawbacks in terms of sus- tainability or security of supply. In other cases • market and industry potential, the technologies proposed are not yet compet- itive as compared to technologies using fossil • barriers to their large-scale deployment, fuels. Therefore, a broad portfolio of low-car- bon technologies is required for coping with • ongoing and planned R&D and demonstration future uncertainty. efforts to overcome technological barriers. According to the Energy Roadmap 2050 (COM(2011)885/2), under the current poli- cies, the market trends show that only half of the targeted greenhouse gas (GHG) emis- sion reductions would be achieved by 2050. The respective shares of electricity generation technologies in such reference scenarios in 2005 and 2050 are shown in Figures 0.1 and 0.2. With more support for research and deve- lopment (R&D) on new technologies and a sup- portive regulatory framework for low-carbon technologies compared to the current policies, the decarbonisation of the energy system can be significantly accelerated. The Energy Roadmap 2050 examined four decarbonisation pathways. These included different combinations of energy efficiency, renewables, nuclear, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) that would allow achieving the goal of 85 % CO2 emission reduction in 2050. The shares of electricity generation technolo- gies for two of these decarbonisation pathways are presented in Figures 0.3 and 0.4. 5 2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan Figures 0.1–0.4: Share of electricity Ref. scenario 2005 Ref. scenario 2050 generation technologies according to the Energy Roadmap 2050 Nuclear energy Hydro Conventional thermal Wind CCS Solar Biomass-waste Geothermal and other renewables Div Supply Tech 2050 high RES 2050 The Technology Map 2013 together with the solar photovoltaics (PV), onshore wind and scheduled Joint Research Centre (JRC) report technologies using biomass), whereas the on Energy Technology Reference Indicators development is slower for others (e.g. CCS, (ETRI)1 of SETIS provide up-to-date and impartial marine energy and geothermal energy). information about the current and anticipated future European energy technology portfolio. • Costs for several low-carbon energy technolo- The two reports provide support to: gies have continued to decline (e.g. onshore wind and solar PV). • policymakers in strategic decision making and in particular for identifying future • Some low-carbon technologies are not yet priorities for research, development and competitive as compared to technologies demonstration (RD&D); using fossil fuels. This remains a key barrier to their large-scale deployment. Barriers to • policymakers in identifying barriers to low- large-scale implementation of RES technolo- carbon technologies; gies have increased in some countries due to reduced financial support. In addition, • the modelling community by providing the very low-carbon emission costs of the a complete overview of the technology, EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) are markets, barriers and techno-economic disadvantageous for low-carbon technolo- performance, which are required for gies versus technologies using fossil fuels. systemic modelling activities. • The increasing share of variable renewa- Trends since 2011 bles and their low operating costs reduce electricity costs and stalled investments in A comparison of the status of the low-carbon conventional fossil-based power production. technologies presented in the Technology Map These could disrupt the grid stability and the 2011 with the Technology Map 2013 highlights security of supply in the longer term if not the following distinguishable trends. addressed properly. • Some types of renewable energy sources • A stable regulatory framework providing a pre- (RES) have added significant capacity (e.g. dictable investment environment is needed for most technologies. 1 To be published in 2014. 6 2013 Technology Map of the European Strategic Energy Technology Plan 1. Wind power generation 1.1 Introduction The main driver for developing wind technology is to minimise the cost of energy (CoE) production, Wind power is the renewable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lewis Wave Power Limited
    Lewis Wave Power Limited 40MW Oyster Wave Array North West Coast, Isle of Lewis Environmental Statement Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary March 2012 40MW Lewis Wave Array Environmental Statement 1. NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction This document provides a Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the Environmental Statement (ES) produced in support of the consent application process for the North West Lewis Wave Array, hereafter known as the development. The ES is the formal report of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) undertaken by Lewis Wave Power Limited (hereafter known as Lewis Wave Power) into the potential impacts of the construction, operation and eventual decommissioning of the development. 1.2 Lewis Wave Power Limited Lewis Wave Power is a wholly owned subsidiary of Edinburgh based Aquamarine Power Limited, the technology developer of the Oyster wave power technology, which captures energy from near shore waves and converts it into clean sustainable electricity. Aquamarine Power installed the first full scale Oyster wave energy convertor (WEC) at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney, which began producing power to the National Grid for the first time in November 2009. That device has withstood two winters in the harsh Atlantic waters off the coast of Orkney in northern Scotland. Aquamarine Power recently installed the first of three next-generation devices also at EMEC which will form the first wave array of its type anywhere in the world. 1.3 Project details The wave array development will have the capacity to provide 40 Megawatts (MW), enough energy to power up to 38,000 homes and will contribute to meeting the Scottish Government’s targets of providing the equivalent of 100% of Scotland’s electricity generation from renewable sources by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquamarine Power – Oyster* Biopower Systems – Biowave
    Wave Energy Converters (WECs) Aquamarine Power – Oyster* The Oyster is uniquely designed to harness wave energy in a near-shore environment. It is composed primarily of a simple mechanical hinged flap connected to the seabed at a depth of about 10 meters and is gravity moored. Each passing wave moves the flap, driving hydraulic pistons to deliver high pressure water via a pipeline to an onshore electrical turbine. AWS Ocean Energy – Archimedes Wave Swing™* The Archimedes Wave Swing is a seabed point-absorbing wave energy converter with a large air-filled cylinder that is submerged beneath the waves. As a wave crest approaches, the water pressure on the top of the cylinder increases and the upper part or 'floater' compresses the air within the cylinder to balance the pressures. The reverse happens as the wave trough passes and the cylinder expands. The relative movement between the floater and the fixed lower part is converted directly to electricity by means of a linear power take-off. BioPower Systems – bioWAVE™ The bioWAVE oscillating wave surge converter system is based on the swaying motion of sea plants in the presence of ocean waves. In extreme wave conditions, the device automatically ceases operation and assumes a safe position lying flat against the seabed. This eliminates exposure to extreme forces, allowing for light-weight designs. Centipod* The Centipod is a Wave Energy Conversion device currently under construction by Dehlsen Associates, LLC. It operates in water depths of 40-44m and uses a two point mooring system with four lines. Its methodology for wave energy conversion is similar to other devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Feature: the Oyster 16
    ISSUE Technology Feature: The Oyster 16 April 2013 Featuring: Aquamarine Power In the latest edition of our newsletter, LRI interviewed Martin McAdam, CEO at Aquamarine Power. Their wave-powered energy converter - Oyster - is among the leading technologies in About Us the UK’s burgeoning marine energy sector. A commercial scale demonstration project is currently operational, and the sites for GreenTechEurope.com Aquamarine Power’s prospective wave farms have been secured (GTE) is a production of and fully permitted. The company is currently looking for London Research corporate equity investors to provide £30m to complete their International (LRI), a global commercialisation program. research and consulting firm with expertise in the Sooner than you think: utility scale marine energy The Oyster wave power device is a buoyant, hinged flap energy, environment, and Who is Aquamarine Power? which is attached to the seabed at depths of between 10 infrastructure sectors. GTE Aquamarine Power is an Edinburgh based wave and 15 metres, around half a kilometre from the shore. is a video-based energy technology and project developer which technology platform Oyster's hinged flap - which is almost entirely underwater conducts their R&D with Queen’s University Belfast - pitches backwards and forwards in the near-shore showcasing innovative and demonstrates their technology in the Orkney waves. The movement of the flap drives two hydraulic technologies from Europe. Islands, Scotland. Their unique approach to pistons which push high pressure water onshore via a developing both the technology and the project site The GTE Newsletter subsea pipeline to drive a conventional hydro-electric is aimed at easing the obstacles within the process turbine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Energy Bill: Pre–Legislative Scrutiny
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Draft Energy Bill: Pre–legislative Scrutiny First Report of Session 2012-13 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 24 May, 12, 19 and 26 June, 3 July, and 10 July 2012 Published on Monday 23 July 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering Ahead! Making Sense of Business Models in Electric Vehicle Charging
    Powering ahead! Making sense of business models in electric vehicle charging October 2018 In association with Contents Acknowledgements 1 Foreword from Energy UK 2 Setting the scene 4 Our approach 5 Key findings 6 How the charging market stacks up 11 Where does charging take place and 14 how does it work? Bringing your business model to life 26 Deep dive on business models 28 What should you do next? 33 Strategy& is PwC’s global strategy consulting team. We help you transform your business by creating strategy that starts with your greatest strengths and builds in execution at every step. We call this strategy that works, and it delivers immediate impact and lasting value for you. As part of the PwC network, we combine 100 years of strategy consulting experience with PwC’s deep industry and functional capabilities. PwC has more than 250,000 people in 158 countries committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax, and advisory services. Acknowledgements To research and fully understand the constantly evolving landscape that is the electric vehicle charging market, we had the good fortune to speak to a number of companies and individuals who are at the very heart of this transformation. We would like to thank everyone who contributed to the report for their insights and time. Addison Lee – Andrew Wescott and Justin Patterson Chargemaster – Tom Callow Ecotricity – Mark Meyrick EDF Energy – Roy Collins ELEXON – Kevin Spencer Elsden Consultants – Miles Elsden Energy UK – Sam Hollister InstaVolt – Tim Payne National Grid – Graeme Cooper and Thomas Maidonis Ovo Energy – Tom Packenham Pivot Power – Matt Allen Pod Point – James McKemey ScottishPower – Malcom Paterson Tesla Western Power Distribution – Ben Godfrey Powering ahead! Making sense of business models in electric vehicle charging 1 Foreword from Energy UK Lawrence Slade Chief Executive I am delighted to work with PwC to bring their insight to investigating the market dynamics of The EV revolution is already upon us.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Going Green
    YOUR GUIDE TO GOING GREEN An Energy Toolkit for Hospitality In partnership with Ecotricity Sustainable Restaurant Association What’s Purpose 3 Understanding the energy market 4 inside Tariffs 4 Other terms 5 Process 7 this Price 10 People 11 Five actions you can take 12 guide References 13 Carbon Emissions = Climate Change 2 Your Guide to Going Green Linking energy more closely to the food, service and Electricity and gas: all foodservice businesses use one, if not both, to store and cook food, ventilate and light their space. Energy use accounts for 4-6% of daily operating costs for the average food service business, space while constituting a significant environmental impact too. A 20% reduction in energy use can represent the same benefit as a 5% increase in sales. This toolkit aims to help you build an energy policy that drives down the carbon footprint of your business and give you the lowdown on green energy to support you in making the switch. Energy is everywhere in your business, On an annual basis the from the embedded energy required to produce food to the running of fridges, British hospitality in- stoves and gas rings, lighting, ventilation, dustry produces more and even the fuel from the truck that carbon emissions than comes to empty the bins. This energy the entire country of leaves a carbon footprint, contributing to Costa Rica. global emissions, bit by bit. On an annual basis, the British hospitality industry produces more carbon emissions than Costa Rica. Burning fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas has provided much of humanity’s energy needs since the Industrial Revolution, but that’s changing in a big way.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Power Cycles with Mixtures As the Working Fluid
    Advanced Power Cycles with Mixtures as the Working Fluid Maria Jonsson Doctoral Thesis Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Energy Processes Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden, 2003 Advanced Power Cycles with Mixtures as the Working Fluid Maria Jonsson Doctoral Thesis Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Energy Processes Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden, 2003 TRITA-KET R173 ISSN 1104-3466 ISRN KTH/KET/R--173--SE ISBN 91-7283-443-9 Contact information: Royal Institute of Technology Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Division of Energy Processes SE-100 44 Stockholm Sweden Copyright © Maria Jonsson, 2003 All rights reserved Printed in Sweden Universitetsservice US AB Stockholm, 2003 Advanced Power Cycles with Mixtures as the Working Fluid Maria Jonsson Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Energy Processes Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Abstract The world demand for electrical power increases continuously, requiring efficient and low-cost methods for power generation. This thesis investigates two advanced power cycles with mixtures as the working fluid: the Kalina cycle, alternatively called the ammonia-water cycle, and the evaporative gas turbine cycle. These cycles have the potential of improved performance regarding electrical efficiency, specific power output, specific investment cost and cost of electricity compared with the conventional technology, since the mixture working fluids enable efficient energy recovery. This thesis shows that the ammonia-water cycle has a better thermodynamic performance than the steam Rankine cycle as a bottoming process for natural gas- fired gas and gas-diesel engines, since the majority of the ammonia-water cycle configurations investigated generated more power than steam cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbocharged Diesel Engine Power Production Enhancement: Proposing a Novel Thermal-Driven Supercharging System Based on Kalina Cycle
    Vol 1, No 2, 2020, 223-234 DOI: 10.22044/rera.2020.9521.1028 Turbocharged Diesel Engine Power Production Enhancement: Proposing a Novel Thermal-Driven Supercharging System based on Kalina Cycle 1 1 1 F. Salek , A. Eskandary Nasrabad and M.M. Naserian * 1- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Montazeri, Khorasan Razavi Branch, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Mashhad, Iran. Receive Date 3 April 2020; Revised 26 April 2020; Accepted Date 25 May 2020 *Corresponding authors: [email protected] (M. M. Naserian) Abstract In this paper, a novel thermal-driven supercharging system is proposed for downsizing of a turbocharged diesel engine. Furthermore, the Kalina cycle is used as a waste heat recovery system to run the mounted supercharging system. The waste heat of air in engine exhaust and intake pipes is converted to the cooling and mechanical power by the Kalina cycle. The mechanical power produced by the Kalina cycle is transferred to an air compressor to charge extra air to the engine in order to generate more power. This feature can be used for downsizing the turbo-charged heavy duty diesel engine. In addition, the heat rejected from the engine intercooler is transferred to the Kalina cycle vapor generator component, and part of the engine exhaust waste heat is also used for superheating the Kalina working fluid before entering the engine. Then the first and second law analyses are performed to assess the operation of the engine in different conditions. Moreover, an economic model is provided for the Kalina cycle, which is added to the engine as a supplementary component.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquamarine Power Response
    Strengthening strategic and sustainability considerations in Ofgem’s decision making Aquamarine Power’s response 1. Introduction “With a quarter of the UK’s generating capacity shutting down over the next ten years as old coal and nuclear power stations close, more than £110bn in investment is needed to build the equivalent of 20 large power stations and upgrade the grid. In the longer term, by 2050, electricity demand is set to double, as we shift more transport and heating onto the electricity grid. Business as usual is therefore not an option.i” Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2010 The coming decades will see a radical shift in the way in which electricity is generated and how it is paid for, and we welcome this discussion paper. We believe marine energy – wave and tidal power – offers a potential new energy source which can make a significant contribution to the UK and global energy mix in the decades ahead. But we are concerned the current charging regime fails to take account of the particular economic challenges faced by these early stage technologies, and as a consequence there is a danger that wave and tidal energy will be ‘locked out’ of any future energy scenario. This would mean UK consumers would miss out on a new form of energy which has the potential to drive down consumer bills in the long term, and also that UK would miss out on a major economic opportunity to become a global leader in new technologies. As project Discovery stated, the lowest domestic fuel bills would be likely to be realised under the ‘Green Stimulus’ scenario in which the UK reaches its 2020 renewable energy targetii.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamics of Power Generation
    THERMAL MACHINES AND HEAT ENGINES Thermal machines ......................................................................................................................................... 1 The heat engine ......................................................................................................................................... 2 What it is ............................................................................................................................................... 2 What it is for ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Thermal aspects of heat engines ........................................................................................................... 3 Carnot cycle .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Gas power cycles ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Otto cycle .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Diesel cycle ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Brayton cycle .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Members of the Access and Forward Looking Task Forces Here
    Organisation Name Email address Task Force Stakeholder Group Forward-Looking Citizens Advice Andy Pace [email protected] Consumer representatives charges Energy Intensive Users Forward-Looking Jeremy Nicholson [email protected] Consumer representatives Group charges Forward-Looking Energy Local Mary Gillie [email protected] Local energy groups charges Forward-Looking Centrica Tim Collins [email protected] Large generators and suppliers charges Forward-Looking Npower (supplier) Daniel Hickman [email protected] Large generators and suppliers charges Scottish Power Energy Forward-Looking Joe Dunn [email protected] Large generators and suppliers Management charges Forward-Looking SSE plc John Tindal [email protected] Large generators and suppliers charges Forward-Looking Good Energy Tom Steward [email protected] Small suppliers charges Forward-Looking BUUK (IDNO) Michael Harding [email protected] Network companies charges Electricity North West Forward-Looking Chris Barker [email protected] Network companies Limited charges Forward-Looking National Grid Louise Schmitz [email protected] Network companies charges Forward-Looking Northern Powergrid Andrew Enzor [email protected] Network companies charges Scottish and Southern Forward-Looking Nigel Bessant [email protected] Network companies Electricity Networks charges Forward-Looking UK Power Networks Chris Ong [email protected] Network companies charges Association for
    [Show full text]