Post-Breeding Migration Routes of Marine Turtles from Bonaire and Klein Bonaire, Caribbean Netherlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Post-Breeding Migration Routes of Marine Turtles from Bonaire and Klein Bonaire, Caribbean Netherlands Vol. 30: 117–124, 2016 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published May 12 doi: 10.3354/esr00733 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Post-breeding migration routes of marine turtles from Bonaire and Klein Bonaire, Caribbean Netherlands L. E. Becking1,2,*,**, M. J. A. Christianen1,2,3,**, M. I. Nava4,*, N. Miller4, S. Willis4, R. P. van Dam5 1Marine Animal Ecology, Wageningen University & Research Centre, PO Box 3700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands 2Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystems Studies (IMARES), Maritime Department, PO Box 57, 1780 AB Den Helder, The Netherlands 3Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, PO Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands 4Sea Turtle Conservation Bonaire, PO Box 492, Kralendijk, Bonaire, Caribbean Netherlands 5Chelonia Inc, PO Box 9020708, San Juan 00902-0708, Puerto Rico ABSTRACT: The management of small rookeries is key to conserving the regional genetic diver- sity of marine turtle populations and requires knowledge on population connectivity between breeding and foraging areas. To elucidate the geographic scope of the populations of marine tur- tles breeding at Bonaire and Klein Bonaire (Caribbean Netherlands) we examined the post-breed- ing migratory behavior of 5 female loggerheads Caretta caretta, 4 female green turtles Chelonia mydas, and 2 male and 13 female hawksbill turtles Eretmochelys imbricata during the years 2004−2013. After leaving Bonaire, the 24 tracked turtles frequented foraging grounds in 10 coun- tries. The distances swum from Bonaire to the foraging areas ranged from 608 to 1766 km for log- gerhead turtles, 198 to 3135 km for green turtles, and 197 to 3135 km for hawksbill turtles, together crossing the waters of 19 countries. Males represented the minority in this study, but we made 2 key observations that require further research: males remained in the vicinity of the breeding area for 3−5 mo, which is 2−5 times longer than females, and males migrated greater distances than previously recorded. Although the turtles dispersed widely across the Caribbean, there appeared to be 2 benthic foraging areas of particular importance to all 3 species of marine turtles breeding at Bonaire, namely the shallow banks east of Nicaragua and Honduras (n = 8 tracked turtles) and Los Roques, Venezuela (n = 3). Marine turtles breeding at Bonaire face threats from legal turtle harvesting, illegal take, and bycatch in the waters that they traverse across the Caribbean. KEY WORDS: Chelonia mydas · Caretta caretta · Eretmochelys imbricata · Migration · Foraging areas · Population connectivity · Satellite telemetry INTRODUCTION ibbean Netherlands, are used regularly for breeding by 3 marine turtle species: loggerheads Caretta It is by now well established that marine turtles can caretta, green turtles Chelonia mydas and hawksbills migrate long distances between their breeding areas Eretmochelys imbricata. Klein Bonaire beaches har- and foraging grounds (Hays & Scott 2013). However, bor the highest concentration of nesting hawksbill for small rookeries, such as those utilizing the islands and loggerhead turtles in the southern Caribbean of the Caribbean Netherlands, knowledge of turtle (excluding Panama) (Debrot et al. 2005, Dow Piniak migratory behavior remains scarce. The beaches and & Eckert 2011). Post-breeding adult turtles do not near shore areas of Bonaire and Klein Bonaire, Car- appear to remain near the islands after the reproduc- © The authors 2016. Open Access under Creative Commons by *Corresponding authors: [email protected], Attribution Licence. Use, distribution and reproduction are un - [email protected] restricted. Authors and original publication must be credited. **Joint first authors, contributed equally Publisher: Inter-Research · www.int-res.com 118 Endang Species Res 30: 117–124, 2016 tive season (Stapleton et al. 2014), yet it is unknown For the 3 species (loggerhead, green and hawksbill what their migration routes are and to which forag- turtles) combined, the breeding season spans the ing grounds these adults migrate. period from May to December, with a peak in nesting All marine turtles have been legally protected on between July and September (Stapleton et al. 2014). and around the islands since 1991. Klein Bonaire, the Turtles were selected based on their size (straight most important nesting area, received full protection carapace length > 80 cm). Further behavioral obser- from development when it was purchased by the vations and recapture data on tagged individuals government in 1999 and incorporated in its entirety showed that the tracked turtles can be considered into the Bonaire National Marine Park. In order to set ‘breeding turtles’; females emerged on nesting up biologically sound management strategies, com- beaches of Bonaire and tagged males were mating, prehensive baseline knowledge is required on turtle as observed during in-water surveys. Additionally, migration in the Dutch Caribbean. There is, however, mature-size turtles were not ob served during in- a significant lack of knowledge on the migration water surveys outside the breeding season in routes of post-breeding adults and on how nesting Bonaire’s waters (Stapleton et al. 2014). colonies from Bonaire are linked to regional neritic Breeding turtles were held for tagging, measure- foraging aggregations. Knowledge of such linkages ment, and transmitter application on nesting beaches is valuable, as foraging aggregations are not homo- (14 females, after oviposition) or in waters immedi- geneously distributed across the Caribbean Sea and ately adjacent to the beaches (3 female loggerheads, migration routes can vary among individuals of the 2 female hawksbills, 2 male hawksbills) (see Table 1, same nesting colony (e.g. Bowen et al. 2007). Bio - Fig. 1A). All animals in this study were double-tagged geographical information on migratory be havior is on their front flippers using metal Inconel No. 681 therefore required for prioritizing research and con- flipper tags (www.nationalband.com) and their lengths servation efforts, for example, in the assignment of were measured (straight [SCL] or curved [CCL] cara- Regional Management Units (Godley et al. 2008, pace length taken from the nuchal notch to the pos- Hamann et al. 2010, Wallace et al. 2010). terior tip of the longest post-central scute). Turtles In order to identify migration routes and key neritic were kept on the beach in a custom-built box or, at foraging habitats, we used satellite telemetry to track sea, constrained in a small boat. Satellite transmitters the movements of marine turtles after breeding at used were the models ST-20 (size: 12 × 6 × 3 cm; Bonaire and Klein Bonaire. Our specific aims were to weight in air: 280 g; Telonics), Spot4 (mold203: size: (1) identify current post-breeding migration routes 16 × 4 × 3 cm; weight in air: 260 g; Wildlife Comput- with the aid of satellite tracking and (2) establish the ers), or Spot5 (size: 8 × 5 × 2 cm; weight in air: 95 g). location of neritic foraging grounds of breeding pop- Prior to transmitter attachment the carapace was ulations at Bonaire. cleaned by removing external commensals, then the instrument was applied at the highest point on the carapace using a silicone or latex elastomer base and MATERIALS AND METHODS covered with resined fiberglass, following Balazs et al. (1996). A fiberglass reinforcement strip was placed This study was carried out during the period 2003− anterior to the point of antenna attachment to reduce 2013 in the marine turtle breeding areas at Bonaire abrasion to the antenna. An angled piece of fiber- and Klein Bonaire: No Name Beach on Klein Bonaire glass was positioned anterior to the flat frontal area of (12.0953° N, 68.1756° W), Playa Chikitu on NE Bo n - the ST-20 transmitters to reduce hydrodynamic drag. aire (12.1650° N, 68.20540° W), and South Bonaire Turtles were released at the location of capture (re - (12.0233° N, 68.1557° W). Since the year 2010 Bonaire corded by GPS) after the 2−4 h transmitter application has formally been part of the Caribbean Netherlands procedure. In subsequent years, whenever possible, as a special municipality (‘Bijzondere Geme ente’) of study animals were recaptured, and, if transmitters The Netherlands. As a signatory of diverse interna- remained attached, these were removed (n = 3). tional treaties (e.g. Cartagena/Specially Protected Location data for instrumented turtles were received Areas and Wildlife [SPAW] protocol, Convention on through Argos. Studies by Argos (2013) and Hays et Biological Diversity, CITES Convention, Convention al. (2001, 2014) have shown that Argos Location for Migratory Species, Inter-American Convention Classes (LC) 3, 2, 1 are the most reliable; thus, data in for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles), LCs 0, A, and B were removed prior to the plotting of The Netherlands is obliged to protect marine turtles tracks. Locations (n = 134) were filtered to exclude inhabiting Dutch Caribbean waters. biologically unreasonable results for travel speeds Becking et al.: Post-breeding migration routes from Bonaire 119 >5 km h−1 (Luschi et al. 1998, 2001, Seminoff et al. mined by the first occasion of the animal reaching an 2008). As post-breeding turtles were not travelling in area <20 km in radius, wherein later LC 1, 2, and 3 straight lines on post-nesting migrations, but rather positions were located during a period of 7 d or were ex pected to be moving in complex ways in longer. The location was subsequently evaluated to coastal waters, we did not use a turning angle filter. be a foraging site based on the literature, ground- Final maps were produced with QGis software (QGIS truthing (Puerto Rico), or the assessment of habitat Development Team 2015). Minimum turtle migration and depth from remote sources (e.g. maps, Google track length was measured by examining the total Earth). path connecting all coordinates with Argos LCs 1, 2, and 3. Date of departure from the breeding grounds was the date when a distance post-breeding >20 km RESULTS from the transmitter application location was attained and the turtle exhibited sustained departure momen- A total of 24 turtles were tracked; all migrated to tum (Blumenthal et al.
Recommended publications
  • International Court of Justice
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org Summary Not an official document Summary 2007/4 8 October 2007 Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras) Summary of the Judgment of 8 October 2007 Chronology of the procedure and submissions of the Parties (paras. 1-19) On 8 December 1999 Nicaragua filed an Application instituting proceedings against Honduras in respect of a dispute relating to the delimitation of the maritime areas appertaining to each of those States in the Caribbean Sea. In its Application, Nicaragua sought to found the jurisdiction of the Court on the provisions of Article XXXI of the American Treaty on Pacific Settlement (officially known as the “Pact of Bogotá”), as well as on the declarations accepting the jurisdiction of the Court made by the Parties, as provided for in Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Court. Since the Court included upon the Bench no judge of the nationality of either of the Parties, each Party proceeded to exercise its right conferred by Article 31, paragraph 3, of the Statute to choose a judge ad hoc to sit in the case. Nicaragua chose Mr. Giorgio Gaja and Honduras first chose Mr. Julio González Campos, who resigned on 17 August 2006, and subsequently Mr. Santiago Torres Bernárdez. By an Order dated 21 March 2000 the President of the Court fixed 21 March 2001 and 21 March 2002, respectively, as the time-limits for the filing of the Memorial of Nicaragua and the Counter-Memorial of Honduras.
    [Show full text]
  • OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Northern Nicaragua Rise During the Oligocene–Miocene: Drowning by Environmental Factors
    Sedimentary Geology 175 (2005) 237–258 www.elsevier.com/locate/sedgeo Research paper Evolution of the Northern Nicaragua Rise during the Oligocene–Miocene: Drowning by environmental factors Maria Muttia,T, Andre´ W. Droxlerb, Andrew D. Cunninghamc aInstitut fu¨r Geowissenschaften, Universita¨t Potsdam, Postfach 60 15 53, Potsdam D-14415, Germany bRice University, Department of Earth Science, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892, USA cBP Amoco, 501 Westlake Park Boulevard, Houston, TX 77253-3092, USA Received 16 June 2004; received in revised form 14 December 2004; accepted 20 December 2004 Abstract Possible causes to explain platform drowning have been hotly debated by carbonate sedimentologists for more than a decade now. In this paper, we present multiple evidence to explain the drowning of a carbonate megabank that covered most of the modern Northern Nicaragua Rise (NNR) during an interval spanning from late Oligocene to early Miocene by the interaction of several environmental factors. The recovery during ODP Leg 165 of late Oligocene to middle Miocene sedimentary sequences in the sub-seafloor of the modern channels and basin, Pedro Channel and Walton Basin, respectively, that dissect the NNR (Site 1000) and south of the rise in the Colombian Basin (Site 999), combined with information from dredged rock samples, allows us to explore in more detail the timing and possible mechanisms responsible for the drowning of the megabank and its relationship to Miocene climate change. The modern system of isolated banks and shelves dissected by a series of intervening seaways and basins on the NNR has evolved from a continuous, shallow-water carbonate bmegabankQ that extended from the Honduras/Nicaraguan mainland to the modern island of Jamaica.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonaire National Marine Park Netherlands
    UNITED NATIONS EP United Nations Original: ENGLISH Environment Program Proposed areas for inclusion in the SPAW list ANNOTATED FORMAT FOR PRESENTATION REPORT FOR: Bonaire National Marine Park Netherlands Date when making the proposal : October 5th, 2010 CRITERIA SATISFIED : Ecological criteria Cultural and socio-economic criteria Representativeness Cultural and traditional use Diversity Area name: Bonaire National Marine Park Country: Netherlands Contacts Last name: HOETJES First name: Paul Focal Point Position: Policy Coordinator Nature Email: [email protected] Phone: (+599) 715 83 08 Last name: De Leon First name: Ramón Manager Position: Park Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: + 599 717 8444 SUMMARY Chapter 1 - IDENTIFICATION Chapter 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Chapter 3 - SITE DESCRIPTION Chapter 4 - ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA Chapter 5 - CULTURAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRITERIA Chapter 6 - MANAGEMENT Chapter 7 - MONITORING AND EVALUATION Chapter 8 - STAKEHOLDERS Chapter 9 - IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM Chapter 10 - OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION ANNEXED DOCUMENTS Chapter 1. IDENTIFICATION a - Country: Netherlands b - Name of the area: Bonaire National Marine Park c - Administrative region: Bonaire d - Date of establishment: 1/1/79 e - If different, date of legal declaration: not specified f - Geographic location Longitude X: -68.280058 Latitude Y: 12.134495 g - Size: 27 sq. km h - Contacts Contact adress: STINAPA Bonaire P.O. BOX 368, Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean Headquarter visitor's address: Barcadera z/n, Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean Website: www.bmp.org Email address: [email protected] i - Marine ecoregion 66. Southern Caribbean Comment, optional Chapter 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Present briefly the proposed area and its principal characteristics, and specify the objectives that motivated its creation : The Bonaire National Marine Park was first established in 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles Caribbean Netherlands Annual Report 2019
    Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles Caribbean Netherlands Annual Report 2019 IAC Annual Report General Instructions Annex IV of the Convention text states that each Contracting Party shall hand in an Annual Report. To complete this Annual Report, Focal Points should consult with various stakeholders involved in sea turtle issues. If you have any questions regarding this Annual Report, please write to the Secretariat Pro Tempore at [email protected] Please note that the date to submit this Annual Report is April 30th, 2019. Part I (General Information) Please fill out the following tables. Add additional rows if necessary. a._ Focal Point Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Institution Quality of the Netherlands, National Office for Caribbean Netherlands Name Paul Hoetjes Date Annual Report submitted 30 April 2019 b._ Agency or Institution responsible for preparing this report Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Name of Agency or Institution Quality, National Office for the Caribbean Netherlands Name of the person responsible for Paul Hoetjes completing this report Address Kaya Gobernador Debrot 46 Telephone(s) +599 715 8308 Fax [email protected] E-mail Inter-American Convention for the Protection and Conservation of Sea Turtles Country Annual Report 2019 c ._ Others who participated in the preparation of this report Name Agency or Institution E-mail Mabel Nava Sea Turtle Conservation Bonaire [email protected] Jessica Berkel St. Eustatius National Parks [email protected] Foundation Part II (Policy and Management) a._ General description of activities carried out for the protection and conservation of sea turtles In accordance with Articles IX and XVIII of the text of the Convention, each Party shall establish monitoring programs, policies and plans for implementation at a national level for the protection and conservation of sea turtles and their habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Policy Plan the Caribbean Netherlands
    Nature Policy Plan The Caribbean Netherlands Nature Policy for the Caribbean Netherlands 2013-2017 Nature Policy Plan The Caribbean Netherlands 2013 - 2017 Contents A | Introduction A Introduction 3 Aruba, Curaçao, St. Maarten, Bonaire, Saba and St. Eustatius Process 4 Policy Objective and Function 4 form the Dutch Caribbean within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The Kingdom of the Netherlands is a B The Caribbean Netherlands in Context 8 1 Nature and Biodiversity 8 comprehensive sovereign state made up of four countries 2 Threats 8 3 Nature as an Economic Resource 10 of which the Netherlands is one. Aruba, Curaçao, and 4 Legal Framework 10 St. Maarten each form one of the three remaining constituent C Roles and responsibilities 14 countries, while the other islands, Bonaire, St. Eustatius, and 1 National Government 15 2 The Island Governments 15 Saba, are Dutch overseas public bodies and as such are part 3 Non-Governmental Nature Conservation Organisations (NGOs) 16 4 International Cooperation 16 of the country of the Netherlands. Collectively these three islands are known as the Caribbean Netherlands and are the D Resources 20 1 National Governement 20 focus of the present Nature Policy Plan. Where possible, 2 Local 21 3 Donations 22 this Nature Policy Plan will be implemented in line with the E Strategy and goals 24 Nature Policy Plans of the other constituent countries of 1 Mainstreaming 24 2 Nature Management 24 the Kingdom. 3 Strategic goals and actions 33 The Dutch Caribbean islands show great biological diversity and support hundreds of endemic species and ecosystems some of which are globally threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sedimentology of Cay Sal Bank - an Incipiently Drowned Carbonate Platform
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations HCNSO Student Work 4-30-2019 The edimeS ntology of Cay Sal Bank - an Incipiently Drowned Carbonate Platform Luis Ramirez [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd Part of the Geology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Luis Ramirez. 2019. The Sedimentology of Cay Sal Bank - an Incipiently Drowned Carbonate Platform. Master's thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, . (503) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/503. This Thesis is brought to you by the HCNSO Student Work at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thesis of Luis Ramirez Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science M.S. Marine Environmental Sciences Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography April 2019 Approved: Thesis Committee Major Professor: Sam Purkis, Ph.D Committee Member: Bernhard Riegl, Ph.D Committee Member: Robert Madden, Ph.D This thesis is available at NSUWorks: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/503 HALMOS COLLEGE OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND OCEANOGRAPHY The Sedimentology of Cay Sal Bank, an Incipiently Drowned Carbonate Platform By Luis F. Ramirez Submitted to the Faculty of Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a specialty in: Marine Environmental Science Nova Southeastern University May 2019 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science: Marine Environmental Science Luis F.
    [Show full text]
  • (Strombus Gigas) in Colombia
    NDF WORKSHOP CASE STUDIES WG 9 – Aquatic Invertebrates CASE STUDY 3 Strombus gigas Country – COLOMBIA Original language – English NON-DETRIMENTAL FINDINGS FOR THE QUEEN CONCH (STROMBUS GIGAS) IN COLOMBIA AUTHORS: Martha Prada1 Erick Castro2 Elizabeth Taylor1 Vladimir Puentes3 Richard Appeldoorn4 Nancy Daves5 1 CORALINA 2 Secretaria de Agricultura y Pesca 3 Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial 4 Universidad Puerto Rico – Caribbean Coral Reef Institute 5 NOAA Fisheries I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE TAXA The queen conch (Strombus gigas) has been a highly prized species since pre-Columbian times, dating the period of the Arawak and Carib Indians. Early human civilizations utilized the shell as a horn for reli- gious ceremonies, for trade and ornamentation such as bracelets, hair- pins, and necklaces. Archeologists have also found remnants of conch shell pieces that were used as tools, possibly to hollow out large trees once used as canoes (Brownell and Stevely 1981). The earliest record of commercial harvest and inter-island trade extend from the mid 18th century, when dried conch meat was shipped from the Turks and Caicos Islands to the neighboring island of Hispaniola (Ninnes 1984). In Colombia, queen conch constitutes one of the most important Caribbean fisheries, it is second in value, after the spiny lobster. The oceanic archipelago of San Andrés, Providence and Santa Catalina pro- duces more than 95% country’s total production of this species. This fishery began in the 1970´s when the continental-shelf archipelagos of San Bernardo and Rosario, following full exploitation were quickly depleted due to a lack of effective management (Mora 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Geelhoed Et Al Important Bird Areas in the Caribbean Netherlands
    Important Bird Areas in the Caribbean Netherlands SCV Geelhoed, AO Debrot, JC Ligon, H Madden, JP Verdaat, SR Williams & K Wulf Report number C054/13 IMARES Wageningen UR Institute for Marine Resources & Ecosystem Studies Client: Ministry of Economic Affairs (EZ) Contact: Drs. H. Haanstra P.O. Box 20401 2500 EK The Hague BO-11-011.05-016 Publication date: 6 May 2013 IMARES is: an independent, objective and authoritative institute that provides knowledge necessary for an integrated sustainable protection, exploitation and spatial use of the sea and coastal zones; an institute that provides knowledge necessary for an integrated sustainable protection, exploitation and spatial use of the sea and coastal zones; a key, proactive player in national and international marine networks (including ICES and EFARO). P.O. Box 68 P.O. Box 77 P.O. Box 57 P.O. Box 167 1970 AB Ijmuiden 4400 AB Yerseke 1780 AB Den Helder 1790 AD Den Burg Texel Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 26 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 59 Fax: +31 (0)223 63 06 87 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 62 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl Cover photo: Red-billed Tropicbird, Great Bay Sint Eustatius December 2012 (Steve Geelhoed) © 2013 IMARES Wageningen UR IMARES, institute of Stichting DLO The Management of IMARES is not responsible for resulting is registered in the Dutch trade damage, as well as for damage resulting from the application of Record nr.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE CONCERNING TERRITORIAL and MARITIME DISPUTE BETWEEN NICARAGUA and HONDURAS in the CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA V
    RUL-30 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) JUDGMENT OF 8 OCTOBER 2007 2007 COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRE|TS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRE DU DIFFEuREND TERRITORIAL ET MARITIME ENTRE LE NICARAGUA ET LE HONDURAS DANS LA MER DES CARAÏBES (NICARAGUA c. HONDURAS) ARRE|T DU 8 OCTOBRE 2007 RUL-30 8 OCTOBER 2007 JUDGMENT TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) DIFFEuREND TERRITORIAL ET MARITIME ENTRE LE NICARAGUA ET LE HONDURAS DANS LA MER DES CARAÏBES (NICARAGUA c. HONDURAS) 8 OCTOBRE 2007 ARRÊT RUL-30 659 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs 1. CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE 1-19 2. GEOGRAPHY 20-32 2.1. Configuration of the Nicaraguan and Honduran coasts 20-30 2.2. Geomorphology of the mouth of the River Coco 31-32 3. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 33-71 4. POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES :AGENERAL OVERVIEW 72-103 4.1. Subject-matter of the dispute 72-73 4.2. Sovereignty over the islands in the area in dispute 74-82 4.3. Maritime delimitation beyond the territorial sea 83-98 4.3.1. Nicaragua’s line: bisector method 83-85 4.3.2. Honduras’s line: “traditional boundary” along the par- allel 14° 59.8′ North latitude (“the 15th parallel”) 86-98 4.4. Starting-point of the maritime boundary 99-101 4.5. Delimitation of the territorial sea 102-103 5. ADMISSIBILITY OF THE NEW CLAIM RELATING TO SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE ISLANDS IN THE AREA IN DISPUTE 104-116 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Research And
    RESEARCH AND MONITORING REPORT 2009 CONTACT US Sea Turtle Conservation Bonaire Mabel Nava, Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: (+599) 717 2225 Cellular: (+599) 780 0433 HOTLINE: 780 0433 PO Box 492 STCB is a member of Kralendijk, Bonaire Netherlands Antilles Welcome… We proudly present our 2009 Bonaire Sea Turtle Research and Monitoring Report. Sea Turtle Conservation Bonaire is a non-governmental, non-profit research and conservation organization that has been protecting sea turtles since 1991. Our mis- sion is to ensure the protection and recovery of Bonaire’s sea turtle populations throughout their range. We are a recognized leader in sea turtle conservation in the Dutch Caribbean and we work to achieve our mission by: • Building a strong case for sea turtle conservation through applied research; • Implementing proactive management and conservation actions to protect Bonaire’s sea turtles and their environments; • Communicating effectively through education, training and advocacy to en- hance awareness of sea turtle conservation issues; and • Developing strategic partnerships and networks to protect Bonaire’s turtles locally and throughout their migratory ranges. Four of the Wider Caribbean’s six species of sea turtles are found in the waters of Bonaire. They are: the hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbracata), the green turtle, (Chelo- nia mydas), the loggerhead (Caretta caretta), and the leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea). The hawksbill and leatherback are considered “critically endangered” throughout their global ranges; and the green and loggerhead considered “endan- gered”. Bonaire offers a relatively safe haven for foraging juvenile hawksbill and green turtles, as well as critical nesting grounds for hawksbill, loggerhead, and green sea turtles.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonaire, Caribbean Netherlands 5-Day, 6-Night Sea Turtles of the Caribbean Adventure & Conservation Vacation
    Destination Eco Tour: Bonaire, Caribbean Netherlands 5-Day, 6-Night Sea Turtles of the Caribbean Adventure & Conservation Vacation Highlights: Package Includes: • Assist biologists in monitoring • Assist with hatchling data sea turtle nesting trends & collection in local hatchery • 5-day/6-night Bonaire sea turtle conservation vacation conducting research • Assist with full-day sea turtle • Boat transfers and day trips to tagging survey • All accommodations & meals included Klein Bonaire • Private, beach-side • Applicable activity participation fees • Shore-based snorkel transects accommodations Trip price does not include international flights, Overview itinerary alcoholic beverages, souvenirs/gifts, personal snacks. Guests responsible for local currency exchange if Day 1 Arrive Bonaire, Netherlands, Caribbean applicable Check into private villa for duration of SWIM Program Dates: June 29 – July 3, 2020 Day 2 Meet the team, project orientation & Island Tour • Introduction to Sea Turtle Conservation Bonaire (STCB) team of biologists Pricing: $2,099 per person* • Introduction to Sea Turtles course and project overview *Based on double occupancy; $200 discount applied • Sightseeing tour of Bonaire before Jan 1, 2020 Day 3 In water monitoring & population survey • Assist STCB biologists with in-water sea turtle transect Activity level: surveys and data collection Coral restoration and nursery tour with Reef Renewal Bonaire Accommodations: Comfort Day 4 Nesting Survey on Klein Bonaire & classroom sea turtle lesson • Boat transfer to Klein
    [Show full text]