DOCSLIB.ORG

Reshaping the European Union Internally And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reshaping the European Union Internally And “The publication is a multidimensional analysis of the complexity and uniqueness of the European Union as a supranational organization. The authors perform a complex analysis of the challenges it faces and the opportunities it creates for its Member States and third countries in the context of the demand- ing EU’s internal and external environment (…) The book is an interesting glimpse into present-day European Union”. – A NEW MATRIX? PROMOTING VALUES, STABILITY AND ECONOMIC PROSPERITY OF THE EU IN THE CHANGING WORLD (IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT) Prof. Ioan Horga “The presented volume provides incisive scholarly analyses of contempo- rary challenges facing the European integration project as well as its global context. The authors investigate EU’s closer neighbourhood, like Russia, Ukraine, or North Macedonia as well as more distant locations, like: Latin RESHAPING THE EUROPEAN UNION America or Africa. Featuring interdisciplinary research, this publication draws together recent INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY developments in the European studies and covers such themes like the Brexit process and differentiated integration, security issues or development policies. – A NEW MATRIX? Meeting the demands of academics, policy-makers and practitioners, the publication offers a wide variety of material, ranging from theoretically informed analyses of general trends and tendencies, through comparative chapters, up to the single case studies”. Prof. Rafał Riedel Edited by: Ewa Latoszek, Anna Masłoń-Oracz, Piotr Stolarczyk, Aleksandra Szczerba-Zawada With the support of the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union ISBN 978-83-8017-295-1 RESHAPING THE EUROPEAN UNION INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY THE EUROPEAN UNION INTERNALLY RESHAPING PROMOTING VALUES, STABILITY AND ECONOMIC PROSPERITY OF THE EU IN THE CHANGING WORLD (IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT) RESHAPING THE EUROPEAN UNION INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY – A NEW MATRIX? PROMOTING VALUES, STABILITY AND ECONOMIC PROSPERITY OF THE EU IN THE CHANGING WORLD (IN THE GLOBAL CONTEXT) RESHAPING THE EUROPEAN UNION INTERNALLY AND EXTERNALLY – A NEW MATRIX? Edited by: Ewa Latoszek, Anna Masłoń-Oracz, Piotr Stolarczyk, Aleksandra Szczerba-Zawada Warsaw 2019 The book is published with the support of The Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union within the scope of Centre of Excellence at Warsaw School of Economics (CEWSE) Project on “European Union’s Security and Stability in a new Economic, Social and Geopolitical Settlement (Project Number 574518-EPP-1-2016-1-PL-EPPJMO-CoE) The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the viewers only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Reviewers Professor Ioan Horga, University of Oradea Professor Rafał Riedel, University of Opole Professor Andrzej Stępniak , University of Gdansk Editorial cooperation and proofreading Magdalena Daniel Blake Wind Cover design Agnieszka Miłaszewicz © Copyright by Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie (Warsaw School of Economics) and Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA Warsaw 2019 ISBN 978-83-8017-295-1 Typesetting and printing by: Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA ul. Inflancka 15/198, 00-189 Warszawa tel. 22 635 03 01 e-mail: [email protected], www.elipsa.pl Contents From the Editors . 7 Willem Molle European Union; Need for a Strong Response to Global Systemic Change . 11 Bogdan J. Góralczyk The End of the Value-Based Global Order . 24 Marianna Gladysh European Security System In The Context of Current Geopolitical Challenges . 37 Vasile Cucerescu The European Law beyond the European Legal Order . 47 Agnieszka Kłos The United Kingdom’s Decision on the Withdrawal from the European Union, its Reasons and Economic Impact . 60 Olga Barburska Troublesome Eastern Neighbourhood: Russia as a Difficult Partner for the European Union . 74 Roman Petrov The EU Ukraine Association Agreement and EU Common Values: One or Two Ways Dialogue? . 87 Artur Adamczyk, Mladen Karadzoski A Challenge for the EU Enlargement Process in the Balkans – The Case of North Macedonia . 101 Magdalena Proczek, Ewa Osuch-Rak EU Development Assistance Instruments under the EU Budget . 116 José Mella African Integration and European Partnership Agreements . 134 Jean-Marc Trouille EU-Africa Relations, China, and the African Challenge . 146 Ewa Latoszek Latin America – European Union: a New Narrative for Further Cooperation? . 157 From the Editors The European Union is currently going through a period of turbulence, associated with the internal problems within the organisation and the challenges arising from global processes. Initially, we witnessed the euphoria that arose in the early 1990s, when the European Union aspired to the role of being the most important world power, when it consolidated its internal market and promoted the construction of a strong, federal Europe. This European Union radiated other European countries, encouraging them to carry out difficult reforms, and giving hope for membership of this organisation . The structure built on the foundations of democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and implementation of the principles of the free market, was identified with the “oasis” of peace, stability and economic prosperity. These features have made membership of the European Union the main goal of most European countries. Also, for the EU itself, the possibility of enlargement meant the stabilization of its environment, the gradual dismantling of potential threats, the expansion of markets and the building of a strong global position. Considering the European Union’s great powerful ambitions from the beginning of the 21st century, its demographic, political, economic and territorial potential was (and still is) an important attribute in international activities. Undoubtedly, the enlargement of its structures with 13 new members was a great success for the European Union, thanks to which the EU created a powerful half-billion economic and political organisation . However, the cycle of prosperity for the EU ended with the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century. After the entry of the 13 new countries, the European Union experienced a period of fatigue with its enlargement. Many politicians and part of the old EU’s society identified enlargement waves, with a weakening of EU cohesion. Then came the financial crisis in the euro area, which particularly affected southern European countries, mainly Greece, but also Portugal, Spain and Ireland. This crisis has undermined the foundations of European integration and the role and position of the European Union on the international stage. Another element threatening the European Union was the migration and refugee 8 From the Editors crisis of 2015, which caused further divisions among the EU members and had a destabilizing effect on the Schengen area. The result of these crises was the decision of the British, who in a referendum in 2016 expressed their will to leave the European Union. Brexit has therefore become another challenge for the EU. The environment of the European Union has also become extremely unstable, as evidenced by Russia’s expansion policy and the annexation of Crimea in 2014, as well as the very unstable situation on the EU’s southeast flank, i.e. in the Middle East. As if that was not enough, in 2017 Donald Trump became the President of the United States, whose policies undermine the credibility of the transatlantic alliance, further weakening the position and role of the European Union in the global dimension. It should also be emphasized that a new global power is growing in strength – China, who is perceived as the main rival to the US, but also competes with European ambitions . In addition, in the EU itself there is a wave of populism, nationalism and the erosion of the rule of law, which is particularly evident in Poland and Hungary. Undoubtedly, the European Union is at the crossroads and faces great challenges related to external processes and internal problems. The authors of this volume, try to analyze and diagnose the current problems of the EU and point out ways to solve them. What is important here, is the optimistic approach of the authors who emphasize the uniqueness of integration processes in Europe and emphasize that consistent cooperation and solidarity can help solve problems and strengthen the EU’s role on the international stage . The publication consists of a selection of papers related to the main challenges that the EU encounters in the globalised world. The first chapter European( Union; Need for a strong response to global systemic change) by Willem Molle, discussed the long-term transition of the global multilateral institutional system and changing position of the main actors, including the EU. The EU has to prepare itself for the increase of unstable institutional environments and to transform itself into a global power player. This should be done by the strengthening internally (development of new common targets and of institutional frameworks) and externally through the development of a global strategy. The discussion is continued in the next chapter The end of the value-based global order (Bogdan J. Góralczyk) where some changes in the situation on the global scene after the global crisis of 2008 are analysed. The old order – rule-based global order dominated by the From the Editors 9 west (US and Europe) is transforming significantly, and China, Russia and other non-Western rising states promote
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CARIFORUM-UE 3651/18 1 the Fourth Meeting of the Joint
    CARIFORUM-EU Brussels, 6 November 2018 ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT CARIFORUM-UE 3651/18 MINUTES Subject: Minutes of the Fourth Meeting of the Joint CARIFORUM-EU Council, held on 17 November 2017 in Brussels, Belgium The Fourth Meeting of the Joint CARIFORUM-EU Council (referred to hereafter as 'the Joint Council') took place in Brussels, Belgium, on 17 November 2017. The Joint Council was chaired on behalf of the European Union jointly by Mr Sven MIKSER, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Estonia, who represented the Council of the EU, and by Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM, European Commissioner for Trade. Ms Kamina JOHNSON SMITH, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade of Jamaica, served as CARIFORUM High Representative. CARIFORUM-UE 3651/18 1 EN 1. OPENING OF THE MEETING The Co-Chairs welcomed the participants to the Meeting. The list of participants is set out in Annex 1 to these Minutes. 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA The Joint Council adopted the agenda as set out in document CARIFORUM-UE 3651/1/17 REV 1, as set out in Annex 2 to these Minutes. 3. PROCEDURAL MATTERS The Joint Council agreed on the procedures for conducting its business. 4. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS REPORT BY THE CARIFORUM-EU TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE The Joint Council took note of the oral progress report by the EU on the Seventh Meeting of the CARIFORUM-EU Trade and Development Committee (TDC), held on 15 November 2017 in Brussels, Belgium. The progress report is set out in Annex 3A to these Minutes. The essence of the reaction by the CARIFORUM High Representative is set out in Annex 3B to these Minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Partnership Agreement Between the Cariforum States, of the One Part, and the European Community and Its Member States, of the Other Part
    Organization of American States ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CARIFORUM STATES, OF THE ONE PART, AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND ITS MEMBER STATES, OF THE OTHER PART Article 1 The objectives of this Agreement are: a)Contributing to the reduction and eventual eradication of poverty through the establishment of a trade partnership consistent with the objective of sustainable development, the Millennium Development Goals and the Cotonou Agreement; b)Promoting regional integration, economic cooperation and good governance thus establishing and implementing an effective, predictable and transparent regulatory framework for trade and investment between the Parties and in the CARIFORUM region; c)Promoting the gradual integration of the CARIFORUM States into the world Objectives economy, in conformity with their political choices and development priorities; d)Improving the CARIFORUM States' capacity in trade policy and trade related issues; e)Supporting the conditions for increasing investment and private sector initiative and enhancing supply capacity, competitiveness and economic growth in the CARIFORUM region; f)Strengthening the existing relations between the Parties on the basis of solidarity and mutual interest. To this end, taking into account their respective levels of development and consistent with WTO obligations, the Agreement shall enhance commercial and economic relations, support a new trading dynamic between the Parties by means of the progressive, asymmetrical liberalisation of trade between them and reinforce, broaden
    [Show full text]
  • EU Agreement on Enhanced Political Dialogue and Cooperation
    INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL DIALOGUE a focus on current issues Issue 126/April 2016 The Implications of the Cuba -EU Agreement on Enhanced Political Dialogue and Cooperation Dr Siphamandla Zondi is the Siphamandla Zondi Head of Institute for Global Dialogue associated with Unisa Havana finds Brussels Again On Friday, 11 March 2016, the European Union and Cuba signed a historic agreement, the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA), to further improve relations that have grown slowly since the start of high-level dialogue between the two parties in 2008. This coincides with the growing rapprochement Global Insight aims to between Cuba and the US under Barack Obama, and suggests that something provide members of the deeper than meets the eye is happening in Cuba's foreign relations. policy community with concise but trenchant While this might be seen as marking the beginning of the end of an important analyses of topical issues. Comments and chapter of the Cold War global relations that remained frozen after the collapse of suggestions are invited. the Soviet Union. Relations between the West and Cuba represent a rescue of Cold War diplomacy and power relations. Whether the recent developments mark a break with this ideological quagmire and if the Cuba-EU agreement will overcome the deep-seated conditions that have frozen the relations up to this point are key questions to be debated as we discuss the future of Cuba in the world. Also crucial is to reflect on the implications of this for the Cuban model of governance and development. Repeatedly, the US intensified its efforts to bring Cuba to its knees, ensuring that the benefits of intense globalization after full-scale Cold War did not extend to this island state.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
    LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN The EU’s relations with Latin America and the Caribbean are multifaceted and conducted at different levels. The EU interacts with the entire region through summits of the heads of state and government, while agreements and political dialogue bind the EU and the Caribbean, Central America, the Andean Community, Mercosur and individual countries. LEGAL BASIS — Title V (EU external action) of the Treaty on European Union; — Titles I-III and V (common commercial policy; development cooperation and humanitarian aid; international agreements) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. REGION-TO-REGION RELATIONS A. The summits The first summit between the EU, Latin America and the Caribbean was held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1999 and established a Bi-regional Strategic Partnership. The most recent biennial summit, held in June 2015 in Brussels, was the second between the EU and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (Comunidad de Estados Latinoamericanos y Caribeños, CELAC). The summits strengthen links between the two regions at the highest level and address issues on the bi-regional and international agendas. Debates have focused on topics such as democracy and human rights; fighting poverty; promoting social cohesion, innovation and technology; and the environment and climate change. The Brussels summit adopted a short political declaration, a longer declaration on the different aspects of the partnership and an EU- CELAC action plan, based on the priorities established by the recent
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union Perception of Cuba: from Frustration to Irritation* Joaquín Roy
    RFC-03-2 The European Union Perception of Cuba: From Frustration to Irritation* Joaquín Roy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fidel Castro dramatically selected the commemoration of the 50th anniversary of his failed attack against the Moncada Barracks in Santiago de Cuba on July 26, 1953, for his rejection of any kind of humanitarian assistance, economic cooperation, and political dialogue with the European Union (EU) and its member states, signalling one of the lowest points in European- Cuban relations.1 Just days before the anniversary of what later history would recognize as the prelude of the Cuban Revolution, the European Union’s Foreign Relations Council issued a harsh criticism of the regime’s latest policies and personal insults against some European leaders (notably, Spain’s José María Aznar), in essence freezing all prospects of closer relations. The overall context was, of course, the global uncertainty of the U.S. occupation of Iraq in the aftermath of the post-September 11 tension. Having survived the end of the Cold War and the perennial U.S. harassment, the Castro regime seemed to have lost its most precious alternative source of international cooperation, if not economic support. RESUMEN Fidel Castro escogió de manera espectacular la fecha de conmemoración del Aniversario 50 del fallido ataque al cuartel Moncada en Santigo de Cuba, el 26 de julio de 1953, para anunciar su rechazo a cualquier tipo de ayuda humanitaria, cooperación económica y diálogo político con la Unión Europea (UE) y sus estados miembros, lo cual marca uno de los niveles más bajos de las relaciones entre Cuba y la UE.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Costs and Benefits of a Closer EU-Canada Economic
    Acknowledgements This report was produced by the Government of Canada (led by Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada) and the European Commission (led by DG Trade), in response to a request formulated by Leaders at the 2007 EU-Canada Summit. The assistance of Professor Walid Hejazi (Rotman Business School, University of Toronto) in the drafting of this study and of Professor Joe Francois (University of Linz) in the economic modelling part of the study is gratefully acknowledged. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Executive Summary......................................................................................... i Introduction and Purpose of the Study ........................................................................................ i Executive Summary...................................................................................................................iii Part 1: Overview of Bilateral Economic Relations .................................................................... 1 1.1 The Current State of the EU-Canada Bilateral Economic Relationship............................... 1 1.2 Economic Policy-Making in the EU and Canada ................................................................. 4 1.3 Economic Relationships with Third Parties.......................................................................... 9 1.4 Analysis of Trade and Production Structures in the EU and Canada ................................. 15 Part 2: Analysis of Factors Affecting EU-Canada Trade and Investment...........................
    [Show full text]
  • EU Trade with Latin America and the Caribbean: Overview and Figures Page 1 of 34
    EU trade with Latin America and the Caribbean Overview and figures IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Authors: Gisela Grieger and Roderick Harte Members' Research Service PE 625.186 – September 2018 EN This publication provides an overview of trade relations between the EU and Latin American and Caribbean countries and groupings. The EU has fully fledged agreements with two Latin American groupings (Cariforum and the Central America group), a multiparty trade agreement with three members of the Andean Community (Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru), and bilateral agreements with Chile and Mexico. Since November 2017, a new agreement governing trade relations with Cuba has also been provisionally applied. In addition, the EU is currently modernising its agreements with Mexico (with which it has reached an 'agreement in principle') and Chile. The EU also has framework agreements with Mercosur and its individual members (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay). The agreement with the former will be replaced, once the ongoing negotiations on an EU-Mercosur association agreement have been completed. This publication provides recent data on trade relations between the EU and Latin American and Caribbean countries and groupings, compares the main agreements governing trade relations that are already in place, and analyses the rationale behind the ongoing negotiations on the EU-Mercosur, EU-Mexico and EU-Chile agreements. This paper has been drawn up by the Members' Research Service, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. To contact the authors, please email: [email protected] Original manuscript, in English, completed in September 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Regional Report on the Mid-Term Review of SIDS Accelerated Modalities of Action
    Caribbean regional report on the mid-term review of SIDS accelerated modalities of action 2 2 ECLAC – Studies and Perspectives Series – The Caribbean – No. Caribbean regional report on the mid-term review... Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... 101 I. Means of implementation ............................................................................................................... 15 A. Coherence and linkages between the Caribbean SIDS sustainable development agenda, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, other global and regional frameworks and coordinating mechanisms ....................................................................................................... 15 1. Intergovernmental bodies ............................................................................................... 15 2. United Nations bodies .................................................................................................... 17 3. Selected cases supporting environmental governance in ............................................... 18 the context of sustainable development ................................................................................. 18 B. National institutionalisation of the SIDS sustainable development agenda ........................... 19 1. Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Continuing the United Kingdom's Trade Relationship with The
    Continuing the United Kingdom’s trade relationship with the CARIFORUM States Continuing the United Kingdom’s trade relationship with the CARIFORUM States Economic Partnership Agreement between the CARIFORUM States, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part May 2019 Continuing the United Kingdom’s trade relationship with the CARIFORUM States Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for International Trade by Command of Her Majesty May 2019 © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-5286-1286-9 CCS0519196036 05/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents Introduction 6 Legal approach 7 Resources 7 Economic Background 8 Economic impact of the existing EPA 11 Potential loss to UK if the CARIFORUM-UK EPA is not ratified 12 Immediate impact if not ratified 12 Explanation of this Agreement, including Significant Differences between the CARIFORUM-UK EPA and the Existing EPA 16
    [Show full text]
  • Serving Whose Interests?: the Political Economy of Trade In
    1111 2 Serving Whose Interests? 3 4 5111 6 7 8 9 1011 1 2 3111 Services permeate almost every moment of our daily lives, whether they are 4 social services such as education, media and midwifery, or inputs to capitalist 5 production such as finance, transport, energy and telecommunications. Yet 6 they are being purged of their social essence in the name of ‘trade’ and 7 relegated to commodities in an international marketplace. Serving Whose 8 Interests? explores the political economy of ‘trade in services’ agreements 9 from a critical legal perspective. 20111 The complex ‘trade’ regime put in place by the General Agreement on 1 Trade in Services, and a new generation of GATS-compliant bilateral and 2 regional agreements, has the potential to constrain the policy choices of 3 virtually every government in the world. These agreements are exclusively 4 the tools of contemporary global capitalism, yet are represented as the 5 new pathway for development through the seemingly benign medium of 6 international trade law. In an evolving chess game, attempts by the major 7 powers to secure national regulations and policies that boost the profits of 8 their transnational corporations and advance their geopolitical ambitions 9 are being frustrated by reluctant Southern governments and the resistance 30111 of social activists. This book draws out the contradictions between the global 1 market model and the intrinsically social nature of services through a 2 combination of theoretical analysis of the legal texts and truly global case 3 studies of the social and political implications, leading the author to question 4 the sustainability of the trade in services regime.
    [Show full text]
  • EU and the Caribbean Seal Economic Partnership with Ground-Breaking Trade Deal
    IP/08/1510 Bridgetown, 15 October 2008 EU and the Caribbean seal economic partnership with ground-breaking trade deal The European Union and countries of the Caribbean region have today signed an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) which will strengthen ties between the two regions and promote regional integration in the Caribbean. The EPA is the first genuinely comprehensive North-South trade and development agreement in the global economy. It includes a package of measures to stimulate trade, investment and innovation, and to promote sustainable development, build a regional market among Caribbean countries and help eliminate poverty. Speaking at the signing ceremony, European Commission Vice-president Siim Kallas said: "This marks a new era in EU-Caribbean economic relations. The EPA puts the Caribbean firmly on the map for trade and investment. I pay tribute to the Caribbean leaders and negotiators for pursuing their vision of a prosperous future for their region." EU Commissioner for Development Louis Michel added: "This is a groundbreaking step forward for regional integration and development for the Caribbean. This deal creates new opportunities for the region in terms of stronger growth and exports, and more jobs." The EPA between the EU and the CARIFORUM group of Caribbean countries was negotiated between 2004 and 2007 after previous trade arrangements failed to stimulate development and were challenged as discriminatory at the WTO. The EPA is a binding international agreement that fully complies with WTO rules and provides security for Caribbean traders and investors. The deal includes chapters on trade in goods; trade in services; investment; competition; innovation and Intellectual Property, public procurement and development aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Know The
    Getting to Know the EPA is one of a series of guides produced by the Caribbean Regional Negotiating Machinery (CRNM) on the subject of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between African, Caribbean and Pacific States and Europe. This Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) guide is designed to clarify basic facts about the EPA. Getting to Know the EPA : Provisions on Services and Investment Does the EPA text include provisions on Services and Investment? Yes. The EPA contains a comprehensive section on Investment and Services as well as common rules on E-commerce. It provides a special provision for the Bahamas and Haiti to join the Agreement but they must submit their commitments on investment and services within six months. Why does the EPA include provisions on Investment? While European investments into CARIFORUM have generally increased over the last decade, investment flows in recent years have been stagnant in most non-tourism sectors. The Parties agreed to investment liberalization in the EPA, in order to establish rules that facilitate the easier flow of investment across the borders of the European Union and all CARIFORUM countries, and a reduction in discriminatory treatment of foreign investors within their respective territories, and greater predictability and transparency. Such an agreement will benefit CARIFORUM countries in terms of transfer of technology, creation of jobs, quality products and services; while creating a more favourable investment climate for their investors in the European Union. The EU is a significant outward investor, with 9 EU members ranking in the top twenty leading outward investor economies. Therefore a properly managed relationship with the EU should create viable opportunities for CARIFORUM, and stimulate growth and dynamism in EU investment flows to the Caribbean.
    [Show full text]