Support to Anti-Corruption in Nigeria” Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Support to Anti-Corruption in Nigeria” Project UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Final Independent Project Evaluation of the “Support to Anti-Corruption in Nigeria” Project NGAX60 Nigeria December 2017 UNITED NATIONS New York, 2017 This evaluation report was prepared by an evaluation team consisting of Mr. Pierre Robert (team leader), Mr. Kelechi Chijioke Iwuamadi and Dr Fatima Waziri-Azi (substantive experts). The Independent Evaluation Unit (IEU) of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) provides normative tools, guidelines and templates to be used in the evaluation process of projects. Please find the respective tools on the IEU web site: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/evaluation/evaluation.html The Independent Evaluation Unit of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime can be contacted at: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Vienna International Centre P.O. Box 500 1400 Vienna, Austria Telephone: (+43-1) 26060-0 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unodc.org Disclaimer Independent Project Evaluations are scheduled and managed by the project managers and conducted by external independent evaluators. The role of the Independent Evaluation Unit (IEU) in relation to independent project evaluations is one of quality assurance and support throughout the evaluation process, but IEU does not directly participate in or undertake independent project evaluations. It is, however, the responsibility of IEU to respond to the commitment of the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) in professionalizing the evaluation function and promoting a culture of evaluation within UNODC for the purposes of accountability and continuous learning and improvement. Acknowledgements The evaluators thank the Abuja-based X60 project team under Polleak Ok Serei for their support in organising the numerous interviews and group meetings carried out during the field visit. The team generously gave their time to provide the evaluators with extensive project information, and shared insights about the project in an open and detailed manner. The evaluators are also grateful to UNODC Nigeria, Country Representative Cristina Albertin and Programme Manager Elisabeth Bayer for their support. The evaluators also express thanks to all the project stakeholders who took time to discuss the project, often at short notice. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors. They do not represent those of UNODC or of any of the institutions referred to in the report. All errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the authors. © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved worldwide. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. ii CONTENTS Page Executive summary ........................................................................................................ vi Summary matrix of findings, evidence and recommendations ....................................... 1 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6 Background of the project............................................................................................... 6 Context of the project………………………………………………………………. ..... 9 The evaluation…………………………………………………………………………. 10 Evaluation methodology ................................................................................................. 11 II. Evaluation findings ......................................................................................................... 13 Design ............................................................................................................................. 13 Relevance ........................................................................................................................ 17 Efficiency ........................................................................................................................ 20 Partnerships and cooperation .......................................................................................... 24 Effectiveness ................................................................................................................... 26 Impact ............................................................................................................................. 32 Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 36 Human Rights ................................................................................................................. 38 Gender............................................................................................................................. 38 Innovation ....................................................................................................................... 39 III. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 43 IV. Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 46 V. Lessons learned.............................................................................................................. 48 Annexes I. Terms of reference of the evaluation .............................................................................. 50 II. Evaluation tools: questionnaires and interview guides ................................................... 69 III. Desk review list .............................................................................................................. 72 IV. List of persons contacted during the evaluation ............................................................. 74 V. Evaluation matrix .......................................................................................................... 75 iii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS PUBLICATION TITLE HERE TITLE PUBLICATION ACA Anti-Corruption Agency ANEEJ Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice APC All Progressives Congress BPP Bureau of Public Procurement BPSR Bureau of Public Service Reform CASAN Civil Society Advocacy to Support Anti-corruption in Nigeria CCB Code of Conduct Bureau CCT Code of Conduct Tribunal CONIG UNODC Country Office in Nigeria CSO Civil Society Organisation DEVCO Development Cooperation Directorate-General DPR Department of Petroleum Regulation EDF (FED) European Development Fund (Fonds européen de développement) EEAS European External Action Service EFCC Economic and Financial Crimes Commission EUD European Union Delegation FCT Federal Capital Territory FGN Federal Government of Nigeria FHC Federal High Court FRMS Financial Resources Management Service goaML Government Office Money Laundering (software) goCASE Government Office Case Management (software) goINTEL Government Office Intelligence Management (software) HRMS Human Resources Management Service IATT Inter-Agency Task Team ICPC Independent Corrupt Practices (and other Related Offenses) Commission IEU Independent Evaluation Unit, UNODC IT Information Technology MBNP Ministry of Budget and National Planning MoU Memorandum of Understanding MTE Mid-Term Evaluation NACS National Anti-Corruption Strategy NBS Nigerian Bureau of Statistics NEITI Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative NFIU Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit NGO Non-governmental organisation NHRC Nigerian Human Rights Commission NIGAWD New Generation Girls and Women Development Initiative NNPC Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation NOA National Orientation Agency OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OGP Open Government Partnership PACAC Presidential Advisory Committee against Corruption PCC Public Complaints Commission PMC Project Management Committee PST Project Support Team RSAME Regional Section for Africa and the Middle East SCUML Special Control Unit on Money Laundering SLA Service-Level Agreement TOR Terms of Reference iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ToT Training of Trainers TUGAR Technical Unit on Governance and Anti-Corruption Reform UNCAC United Nations Convention against Corruption UNEG United Nations Evaluation Group UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background of the project This is the report of the final Independent Project Evaluation of the project “Support to Anti- Corruption in Nigeria” (NGAX60), implemented by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) through its Country Office in Nigeria (CONIG), based in Abuja, Nigeria from November 2012 (project activities stated in 2013) till August 2017, with the collaboration of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) for the implementation of the Civil Society component of the project. With an original budget of €34m, reduced in 2015, the project’s disbursed budget as at end-March 2017 was US$14,146,808, out of a total approved budget – fully pledged, supported by the European Union Delegation (EUD) in Nigeria – of US$18,533,863. The evaluation The summative final evaluation was undertaken by a team of three independent external evaluators, i.e. a team leader and two substantive experts.1 The methodology of the
Recommended publications
  • Olympic Charter
    OLYMPIC CHARTER IN FORCE AS FROM 17 JULY 2020 OLYMPIC CHARTER IN FORCE AS FROM 17 JULY 2020 © International Olympic Committee Château de Vidy – C.P. 356 – CH-1007 Lausanne/Switzerland Tel. + 41 21 621 61 11 – Fax + 41 21 621 62 16 www.olympic.org Published by the International Olympic Committee – July 2020 All rights reserved. Printing by DidWeDo S.à.r.l., Lausanne, Switzerland Printed in Switzerland Table of Contents Abbreviations used within the Olympic Movement ...................................................................8 Introduction to the Olympic Charter............................................................................................9 Preamble ......................................................................................................................................10 Fundamental Principles of Olympism .......................................................................................11 Chapter 1 The Olympic Movement ............................................................................................. 15 1 Composition and general organisation of the Olympic Movement . 15 2 Mission and role of the IOC* ............................................................................................ 16 Bye-law to Rule 2 . 18 3 Recognition by the IOC .................................................................................................... 18 4 Olympic Congress* ........................................................................................................... 19 Bye-law to Rule 4
    [Show full text]
  • Gogo Vision What's Playing
    GOGO VISION WHAT’S PLAYING CATALOG 183 MOVIES (100) TITLE TITLE NEW CONTENT Harriet A Star is Born Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets Sherlock Holmes Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 The Big Lebowski Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire The Breakfast Club Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince The Croods Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix Those Who Wish Me Dead Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban Addams Family, The (2019) Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone An American Pickle Horrible Bosses Batman Begins Horrible Bosses 2 Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice Impractical Jokers: The Movie Bill and Ted Face the Music Invisible Man, The Birds of Prey (And the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) It's Complicated Blinded By The Light Joker Boogie Judas and the Black Messiah Coco Just Mercy Crazy Rich Asians Kajillionaire Crazy, Stupid, Love Let Them All Talk Die Hard Lilo and Stitch Disneys Upside-Down Magic Limbo Doctor Sleep Locked Down E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial Lucy in the Sky Elf Marvel Studios' Black Panther Emma Marvel Studios’ Avengers: Infinity War Finding Dory Marvel’s the Avengers: Age of Ultron Finding Nemo Minions Frozen 2 Mortal Kombat Godzilla v. Kong Mulan Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 My Spy Movies 1 TITLE News of the World The Dark Knight Nobody The Dark Knight Rises Nomadland The Kitchen Office Space The Lego Batman Movie Onward The Lego Movie Photograph, The The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part Queen & Slim
    [Show full text]
  • St. Justin the Martyr Roman Catholic Church 975 Fischer Boulevard, Toms River, NJ 08753 September 26, 2021 TWENTY-SIXTH SUNDAY in ORDINARY TIME
    St. Justin the Martyr Roman Catholic Church 975 Fischer Boulevard, Toms River, NJ 08753 September 26, 2021 TWENTY-SIXTH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME PLEASE VIEW IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING OUR MASS SCHEDULE ON PAGES 5 & 6 Readings for the Week of September 26, 2021 Monday: Zec 8:1-8; Ps 102:16- 18, 19-21, 29, 22-23; Lk 9:46-50 Tuesday: Zec 8:20-23; Ps 87:1b- 3, 4-5, 6-7; Lk 9:51-56 Wednesday: Dn 7:9-10, 13-14 or Rv 12:7-12ab; Ps 138:1-2ab, 2cde -3, 4-5; Jn 1:47-51 Thursday: Neh 8:1-4a, 5-6, 7b- 12; Ps 19:8, 9, 10, 11; Lk 10:1-12 Friday: Bar 1:15-22; Ps 79:1b-2, 3-5, 8, 9; Lk 10:13-16 Saturday: Bar 4:5-12, 27-29; Ps 69:33-35, 36-37; Mt 18:1-5, 10 Sunday: Gn 2:18-24; Ps 128:1-2, 3, 4-5, 6; Heb 2:9-11; Mk 10:2-16 or 10:2-12 PARISH OFFICE: 732-270-3980 Pastor: Reverend Mark A. Kreder RELIGIOUS EDUCATION: 732-270-3797 Deacons: James Campbell; James Gillespie (please call and leave message) Frederick C. Ebenau, Sr.; Pastoral Associate: Deacon James Gillespie REGISTRATION: All are welcome! Sponsorship Religious Education: Ellen Noble letters for the Sacraments of Baptism, Confirmation or Matrimony will only be issued to registered Trustees: Jean Glynn, William Anderson parishioners. Please contact the Parish Office to Director of Sacred Music: Angela Petti register and please also notify the Parish Office of a Sacristan: Carol Lewandowski change of address or if you plan to move from the parish so that we may keep our records updated.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda National Action Plan (2009-2012)
    Republic of Rwanda National Action Plan 2009-2012 The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325/2000 on Women, Peace and Security Original: French May 2010 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 3 B. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 C. PROCESS OF THE NATIONAL ACTION PLAN DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 8 D. REMINDER ON PEACE AND SECURITY CONCEPTS.................................................................... 10 E. INTERVENTION STRATEGIES ......................................................................................................... 11 F. LOGICAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................... 12 Priority I: Prevention of gender - based violence ........................................................................................ 12 Priority II: Protection and Rehabilitation of Victims’ Dignity ................................................................... 14 Priority III: Participation and Representation .............................................................................................. 17 Priority IV: Women and Gender Promotion ................................................................................................ 19 Priority V. Coordination, Monitoring and Evaluation
    [Show full text]
  • Robert F. Williams, Negroes with Guns, Ch. 3-5, 1962
    National Humanities Center Resource Toolbox The Making of African American Identity: Vol. III, 1917-1968 Robert F. Williams R. C. Cohen Negroes With Guns *1962, Ch. 3-5 Robert F. Williams was born and raised in Monroe, North Carolina. After serving in the Marine Cops in the 1950s, he returned to Monroe and in 1956 assumed leadership of the nearly defunct local NAACP chapter; within six months its membership grew from six to two-hundred. Many of the new members were, like him, military veterans trained in the use of arms. In the late 1950s the unwillingness of Southern officials to address white violence against blacks made it increasingly difficult for the NAACP to keep all of its local chapters committed to non-violence. In 1959, after three white men were acquitted of assaulting black women in Monroe, Williams publicly proclaimed the right of African Americans to armed self-defense. The torrent of criticism this statement brought down on the NAACP prompted its leaders — including Thurgood Marshall, Roy Wilkins, and Martin Luther King, Jr. — to denounce Williams. The NAACP eventually suspended him, but he continued to make his case for self-defense. Williams in Tanzania, 1968 Chapter 3: The Struggle for Militancy in the NAACP Until my statement hit the national newspapers the national office of the NAACP had paid little attention to us. We had received little help from them in our struggles and our hour of need. Now they lost no time. The very next morning I received a long distance telephone call from the national office wanting to know if I had been quoted correctly.
    [Show full text]
  • SAINT ROBERT BELLARMINE PARISH EXALTATION of the HOLY CROSS PARISH JANUARY 12, 2020 Parish Information the Baptism of the Lord
    SAINT ROBERT BELLARMINE PARISH EXALTATION OF THE HOLY CROSS PARISH JANUARY 12, 2020 Parish Information The Baptism of the Lord Joining the Parish The origin and foundation of Christian Baptism is Jesus. New Parishioners are always welcome. Call your Parish Office for a Census Before starting his public ministry, Jesus submitted him- Form. self to the baptism given by John the Baptist. The waters Planning a Baptism did not purify him; he cleansed the waters. The birth of a child brings joy to the family. Through Baptism, that child is “He comes to sanctify the Jordan for our sake . joined to the family of God, which brings to begin a new creation through the Spirit great joy to the church. Parents seeking and water” Baptism are asked to contact the Parish (St. Gregory Nazianzen, Liturgy of the Hours, I, 634). Office. Jesus’ immersion in the water is a sign for all human Sacrament of Confirmation beings of the need to die to themselves to do God’s will. Confirmation is administered yearly to all 8th Grade students in our Religious Jesus did not need to be baptized because he was total- Education Program and students ly faithful to the will of his Father and free from sin. How- attending Catholic Schools. Students ever, he wanted to show his solidarity with human be- wishing to receive Confirmation must be ings in order to reconcile them to the Father. By commanding his disciples to bap- enrolled for at least two years before tize all nations, he established the means by which people would die to sin— they are eligible to receive Confirma- Original and actual—and begin to live a new life with God.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Overview Director of People and Culture
    Position Overview Director of People and Culture Marion Polk Food Share is the regional food bank leading the fight to end hunger in Marion and Polk Counties. Support from our local community makes it possible for the Food Share to collect and distribute nutritious food for children, adults and seniors through more than 100 partner programs, including food pantries, meal sites and home-delivered meals and to carry out programs to address the root causes of hunger. The mission of Marion Polk Food Share is “Leading the fight to end hunger in Marion and Polk counties, because no one should be hungry.” At the Food Share, our commitment is to: ▪ Treat all people as our neighbor ▪ Encourage creativity and be willing to take risks ▪ Listen first and seek to understand ▪ Focus on shared goals ▪ Celebrate diversity, ensure dignity and act equitably Summary of Role: The Director of People and Culture oversees the Food Share’s engagement of its most valuable resource – people. The Director of People and Culture will lead on culture practices, and provide expertise and support in the areas of Performance Management, Employee Relations, Employee Engagement, Diversity & Inclusion, Policy and Procedure Development, and HR Compliance. Areas of Responsibility, Evaluation and Essential Functions: 1. Diversity and Inclusion (20%) Provide leadership and coordination to the agency’s Equity Committee and Leadership Team to develop, implement, and report on the agency’s equity goals, plan and outcome. Collaborate with the leadership team and to integrate diversity, equity, and inclusion practices into workplace and program practices, and into agency and program goals.
    [Show full text]
  • High School Graduation Packet
    High School Graduation Packet ! Dear Student, Thank you for your passion and commitment toward creating a more inclusive world. You have witnessed first-hand the uncompromising joy that Special Olympics brings to every person involved. Understanding at a young age the importance of inclusion and acceptance will surely brighten your path as you move forward. Individuals like yourself are the reason Special Olympics continues to grow and lead the global fight for dignity and respect. Special Olympics invites all its young leaders to be a lasting force for change through a lifetime of participation. Whatever your course after high school, there are ways to remain involved in Special Olympics, whether through community-based programming or collegiate Special Olympics programs; it is nearly impossible to go anywhere without finding some way to engage. I encourage you to take what you have learned in high school and continue to champion the Special Olympics movement in colleges and communities across the country. Continue the fight against exclusion and stigma. Your experiences need to be heard. Each interaction with Special Olympics is unique, and the insights you can provide will help grow our global community of inclusion. I would like to ask you to take our graduation survey, which can be found here, so that you can continue your relationship with Special Olympics and receive our unwavering support on your next journey. You are the future of Special Olympics. You have the power to transform how people see the world and how communities interact. You can be the spark that ignites change. Thank you for your dedication and your leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • The Johnson-Jeffries Fight and Censorship of Black Supremacy
    THE JOHNSON-JEFFRIES FIGHT 100 YEARS THENCE: THE JOHNSON-JEFFRIES FIGHT AND CENSORSHIP OF BLACK SUPREMACY Barak Y. Orbach* In April 2010, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. Stevens, in which the Court struck down a federal law that banned the depiction of conduct that was illegal in any state. Exactly one hundred years earlier, without any federal law, censorship of conduct illegal under state law and socially con- demned mushroomed in most towns and cities across the country. In the summer of 1910, states and municipalities adopted bans on prizefight films in order to censor black supremacy in controver- sial sport that was illegal in most states. It was one of the worst waves of movie censorship in American history, but it has been largely ignored and forgotten. On the Fourth of July, 1910, the uncompromising black heavy- weight champion, Jack Johnson, knocked out the “great white * Associate Professor of Law, The University of Arizona. www.orbach.org. This Article greatly benefited from the comments and criticism of Jean Braucher, Grace Campbell, Jack Chin, Paul Finkelman, Deb Gray, Sivan Korn, Anne Nelson, Carol Rose, and Frances Sjoberg. Judy Parker, Pam DeLong, and Carol Ward assisted in processing archive documents. The outstanding research support and friendship of Maureen Garmon made the writing of this Article possible. Additional materials are available at www.orbach.org/1910. 270 2010] The Johnson-Jeffries Fight 271 hope,” Jim Jeffries, in what was dubbed by the press and promoters as “the fight of the century.” Jeffries, a former heavyweight cham- pion himself, returned to the ring after a five-year retirement to try to reclaim the heavyweight championship for the white race.
    [Show full text]
  • Advice to Those Who Stutter Who Those to Advice SECOND EDITION
    advice to those who stutter SECOND EDITION advice to those who stutter THE STUTTERING FOUNDATION® A Nonprofit Organization Since 1947—Helping Those Who Stutter 3100 Walnut Grove Road, Suite 603 P.O. Box 11749 • Memphis, TN 38111-0749 800-992-9392 901-452-7343 www.stutteringhelp.org Second Edition www.tartamudez.org SFA Publication SFA No. 0009 ISBN 0-933388-39-X Expert help from THE 28 therapists who STUTTERING stutter themselves FOUNDATION® ISBN 0-933388-39-X PUBLICATION NO. 0009 9 7 8 0 9 3 3 3 8 8 3 9 0 Myths about stuttering Winston Churchill John Stossel Marilyn Monroe James Earl Jones Myth: People who stutter are not smart. Did you know... Reality: There is no link whatsoever between stuttering and intelligence. Ⅲ Over three million Americans stutter. Stuttering affects three to four times as many males as females. Myth: Nervousness causes stuttering. Ⅲ Ⅲ Approximately 5% of all children go through a period of stuttering that lasts six months or Reality: Nervousness does not cause stuttering. Nor should we assume that more. Three-quarters of those will recover by late childhood, leaving about 1% with a long- people who stutter are prone to be nervous, fearful, anxious, or shy. term problem. They have the same full range of personality traits as those who do not stutter. Ⅲ Exciting new research in the areas of genetics, neurophysiology, child development, and family dynamics is shedding light on the possible causes of stuttering. As a result, we have made Myth: Stuttering can be “caught” through imitation or by hearing another tremendous progress in the prevention of stuttering in young children.
    [Show full text]
  • TEXAS HUMAN TRAFFICKING Prevention Task Force REPORT 2018
    THE TEXAS HUMAN TRAFFICKING Prevention Task Force REPORT 2018 TO THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE • DECEMBER 2018 Report to the Texas Legislature Human Trafficking Prevention Task Force December 2018 Office of the Attorney General Texas Human Trafficking Prevention Task Force: 2018 Report to the Legislature and the Legislative Budget Board As the Task Force begins its second decade in the fight human against trafficking, the critical need for the strategic coordination of state resources against modern day slavery is more evident than ever. We look forward to building on the successful prosecutions, victim service networks, and an educated and empowered public to make Texas a place where people are free from exploitation and able to realize their fullest potential. Attorney General Ken Paxton In 2008, Texas issued its first report on human trafficking in the state, The Texas Response to Human Trafficking. This comprehensive report provided an in-depth look at the laws in Texas – focusing on how they impacted trafficking prosecutions, investigations, and service provision for survivors. Recognizing that Texas had a long road ahead of it to address human trafficking in the state, the report recommended creation of a statewide multi-agency human trafficking task force. In 2009, the 81st Legislature created the Texas Human Trafficking Prevention Task Force (Task Force) to respond to the growing crisis – entrusting the members to develop legislative recommendations to attack the crime and policies to protect victims. In the 10 years since its creation, the Task Force has made 70 recommendations to the legislature to address human trafficking, with 65 becoming law. Those recommendations have included ways to prevent trafficking, protect victims, and prosecute offenders.
    [Show full text]