Support to Anti-Corruption in Nigeria” Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Final Independent Project Evaluation of the “Support to Anti-Corruption in Nigeria” Project NGAX60 Nigeria December 2017 UNITED NATIONS New York, 2017 This evaluation report was prepared by an evaluation team consisting of Mr. Pierre Robert (team leader), Mr. Kelechi Chijioke Iwuamadi and Dr Fatima Waziri-Azi (substantive experts). The Independent Evaluation Unit (IEU) of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) provides normative tools, guidelines and templates to be used in the evaluation process of projects. Please find the respective tools on the IEU web site: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/evaluation/evaluation.html The Independent Evaluation Unit of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime can be contacted at: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Vienna International Centre P.O. Box 500 1400 Vienna, Austria Telephone: (+43-1) 26060-0 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unodc.org Disclaimer Independent Project Evaluations are scheduled and managed by the project managers and conducted by external independent evaluators. The role of the Independent Evaluation Unit (IEU) in relation to independent project evaluations is one of quality assurance and support throughout the evaluation process, but IEU does not directly participate in or undertake independent project evaluations. It is, however, the responsibility of IEU to respond to the commitment of the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) in professionalizing the evaluation function and promoting a culture of evaluation within UNODC for the purposes of accountability and continuous learning and improvement. Acknowledgements The evaluators thank the Abuja-based X60 project team under Polleak Ok Serei for their support in organising the numerous interviews and group meetings carried out during the field visit. The team generously gave their time to provide the evaluators with extensive project information, and shared insights about the project in an open and detailed manner. The evaluators are also grateful to UNODC Nigeria, Country Representative Cristina Albertin and Programme Manager Elisabeth Bayer for their support. The evaluators also express thanks to all the project stakeholders who took time to discuss the project, often at short notice. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors. They do not represent those of UNODC or of any of the institutions referred to in the report. All errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the authors. © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved worldwide. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. ii CONTENTS Page Executive summary ........................................................................................................ vi Summary matrix of findings, evidence and recommendations ....................................... 1 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6 Background of the project............................................................................................... 6 Context of the project………………………………………………………………. ..... 9 The evaluation…………………………………………………………………………. 10 Evaluation methodology ................................................................................................. 11 II. Evaluation findings ......................................................................................................... 13 Design ............................................................................................................................. 13 Relevance ........................................................................................................................ 17 Efficiency ........................................................................................................................ 20 Partnerships and cooperation .......................................................................................... 24 Effectiveness ................................................................................................................... 26 Impact ............................................................................................................................. 32 Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 36 Human Rights ................................................................................................................. 38 Gender............................................................................................................................. 38 Innovation ....................................................................................................................... 39 III. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 43 IV. Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 46 V. Lessons learned.............................................................................................................. 48 Annexes I. Terms of reference of the evaluation .............................................................................. 50 II. Evaluation tools: questionnaires and interview guides ................................................... 69 III. Desk review list .............................................................................................................. 72 IV. List of persons contacted during the evaluation ............................................................. 74 V. Evaluation matrix .......................................................................................................... 75 iii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS PUBLICATION TITLE HERE TITLE PUBLICATION ACA Anti-Corruption Agency ANEEJ Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice APC All Progressives Congress BPP Bureau of Public Procurement BPSR Bureau of Public Service Reform CASAN Civil Society Advocacy to Support Anti-corruption in Nigeria CCB Code of Conduct Bureau CCT Code of Conduct Tribunal CONIG UNODC Country Office in Nigeria CSO Civil Society Organisation DEVCO Development Cooperation Directorate-General DPR Department of Petroleum Regulation EDF (FED) European Development Fund (Fonds européen de développement) EEAS European External Action Service EFCC Economic and Financial Crimes Commission EUD European Union Delegation FCT Federal Capital Territory FGN Federal Government of Nigeria FHC Federal High Court FRMS Financial Resources Management Service goaML Government Office Money Laundering (software) goCASE Government Office Case Management (software) goINTEL Government Office Intelligence Management (software) HRMS Human Resources Management Service IATT Inter-Agency Task Team ICPC Independent Corrupt Practices (and other Related Offenses) Commission IEU Independent Evaluation Unit, UNODC IT Information Technology MBNP Ministry of Budget and National Planning MoU Memorandum of Understanding MTE Mid-Term Evaluation NACS National Anti-Corruption Strategy NBS Nigerian Bureau of Statistics NEITI Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative NFIU Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit NGO Non-governmental organisation NHRC Nigerian Human Rights Commission NIGAWD New Generation Girls and Women Development Initiative NNPC Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation NOA National Orientation Agency OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OGP Open Government Partnership PACAC Presidential Advisory Committee against Corruption PCC Public Complaints Commission PMC Project Management Committee PST Project Support Team RSAME Regional Section for Africa and the Middle East SCUML Special Control Unit on Money Laundering SLA Service-Level Agreement TOR Terms of Reference iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ToT Training of Trainers TUGAR Technical Unit on Governance and Anti-Corruption Reform UNCAC United Nations Convention against Corruption UNEG United Nations Evaluation Group UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background of the project This is the report of the final Independent Project Evaluation of the project “Support to Anti- Corruption in Nigeria” (NGAX60), implemented by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) through its Country Office in Nigeria (CONIG), based in Abuja, Nigeria from November 2012 (project activities stated in 2013) till August 2017, with the collaboration of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) for the implementation of the Civil Society component of the project. With an original budget of €34m, reduced in 2015, the project’s disbursed budget as at end-March 2017 was US$14,146,808, out of a total approved budget – fully pledged, supported by the European Union Delegation (EUD) in Nigeria – of US$18,533,863. The evaluation The summative final evaluation was undertaken by a team of three independent external evaluators, i.e. a team leader and two substantive experts.1 The methodology of the