DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Samuel 2:12-36 – Samuel and the Wicked Sons of Eli

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Samuel 2:12-36 – Samuel and the Wicked Sons of Eli 1 Samuel 2:12-36 – Samuel and the Wicked Sons of Eli Big Idea The importance of this passage in the overall picture of 1 Samuel is seen in the fact that God is raising up Samuel to take over the priestly duties from Eli and his sons. Eli’s house is about to come under judgment and Samuel is being prepared to step into a unique role of prophet/priest/judge. It was Samuel who would be God’s human agent to transition Israel from a loose confederation of tribes to a monarchy. Overview of the Passage This passage shows the stark contrast between Eli’s wicked sons and Samuel. It demonstrates massive moral failure in the lives of God’s representatives before His people. Hophni and Phinehas disregarded the law of God and did whatever they wanted in their role as priests. Eli knew about it and made marginal effort to rebuke them. In the meantime, Samuel continues to grow and mature as he serves the Lord at Shiloh. Read 1 Samuel 2:12-36 Commentary Eli’s Wicked Sons – 2:12-21 2:12-17 This section reveals the first major area of sin in the lives Contrast Between Eli’s Sons & of Eli’s sons, Hophni and Phinehas. It had to do with their Samuel priestly duties at Shiloh. The law precisely prescribed how sacrifices were to be offered and of which portions of the Samuel Serving Faithfully (2:11) meat sacrificed the priests were allowed to partake (Lev. 7:31-32; Deut. 18:3). Hophni and Phinehas completely Hophni & Phinehas Sinning (2:12-17) disregarded the law’s prescription and did whatever they Samuel Serving Faithfully (2:18-21) wanted. Hophni & Phinehas Sinning (2:22-25) They had devised a system where they would take the choicest parts of the meat, using a three-pronged fork to Samuel Growing (2:26) retrieve the meat from the boiling pot (vv. 13-14). They Judgment on Hophni & Phinehas also would take meat raw so that they could roast it instead (2:27-36) of boil it, as the law prescribed (vv. 15-16). And perhaps worst of all, they would take the fat portions, which were Samuel Serving Faithfully (3:1a) expressly forbidden to take, as they were the LORD’s portion (vv. 15-16; see Ex. 29:13; Lev. 3:3-5). If any refused to go along with their wishes, they threatened violence (v. 16). What’s in a Name? Depending on your version, the sons of Eli are described in verse 12 as “worthless” (ESV, NASB), “corrupt” (NKJV), “wicked” (BSB), “scoundrels” (NIV), or “sons of Belial” (KJV). “Sons of Belial” is the literal translation from the Hebrew. It was a well-known phrase, which spoke of wicked, vile persons. It is used of those who incite idolatry (Deut. 13:13) or insurrection (1 Sam. 10:27; 2 Sam. 16:7; 20:1); who are sexually immoral (Judg. 19:22); or who are liars (1 Kgs. 21:10, 13). Paul uses the phrase in 2 Cor. 6:15 as a name for Satan. The assessment of Hophni and Phinehas is grim indeed. Along with being called “sons of Belial” (see above), they are said to “not know the LORD” (v. 12). Their sin is said to be “very great in the sight of the LORD, for the men treated the offering of the LORD with contempt” (v. 17). Truly, contempt for the things of God is contempt for God Himself! 2:18-21 In stark contrast to the wicked sons of Eli, Samuel was faithfully ministering before the LORD, and growing. He was acting as an apprentice priest, of sorts. He wore the priestly clothing, a linen ephod and robe (vv. 18-19). His mother, Hannah, would hand-make a new one each year to bring to him as he grew (v. 19). Eli blessed Elkanah and Hannah when they came up to offer their yearly sacrifice. He said, “May the LORD give you children by this woman for the petition she asked of the LORD” (v. 20). The LORD heard this prayer and chose to honor it. He blessed Hannah, and she conceived and bore a total of five more children—three more sons and two daughters (v. 21). Samuel, now called a “young man,” who was ministering before the LORD, also “grew in the presence of the LORD” (v. 21). Eli Rebukes His Sons – 2:22-26 2:22-25 In these verses, we find the second major area of sin in the lives of Hophni and Phinehas. They not only treated the offerings of the LORD with contempt, they also took advantage of “the women who were serving at the entrance to the tent of meeting” (v. 22). Those who were supposed to be holy and set apart for the LORD’s service are, in this case, leading Israel astray in perverted worship and sexual immorality. These women were not there to be cultic prostitutes, as was the case in many Canaanite religions. They were just women who were helping out at the tent of meeting (see Ex. 38:8). And Eli’s sons preyed upon them. We also see in these verses, Eli’s rebuke of the actions of his sons. Eli had heard “all that his sons were doing to all Israel” (v. 22) and their “evil dealings” which he heard from “all the people” (v. 23). For Eli to call it “no good report” (v. 24) seems like an understatement. The heart of Eli’s rebuke is found in verse 25: “If someone sins against a man, God will mediate for him, but if someone sins against the LORD, who can intercede for him?” Eli knows that they have sinned against not only other men, but also against the LORD Himself. He asks the poignant question of who can intercede in such a case. If God would surely judge when one sinned against a man, how much more would He bring judgment upon those who sinned against Him. When one has rejected God and His ways, and chooses to live in stubborn unbelief, there is no intercessor for them. What a dreadful, hopeless place to be! The text tells us that Hophni and Phinehas “would not listen to the voice of their father,” and then it tells us why: “for it was the will of the LORD to put them to death” (v. 25). They had rejected God, and they had ignored their father’s warning. And now God had determined to bring judgment against them. It seems that after a pattern of rejection in the hearts of Eli’s sons, God hardened their hearts, like He did with Pharaoh (see Ex. 4:21; 7:13, 22; 8:15, 32; 9:12, 35; 10:1, 20, 27; 11:10; 14:4, 8). Hophni and Phinehas failed to learn the lesson of Nadab and Abihu (Lev. 10:1-2). 2:26 Once again, the contrast is sharp. While Eli’s sons are wicked and destined for destruction, Samuel “continued to grow both in stature and in favor with the LORD and also with man” (v. 26). This is the same kind of description used of our Lord Jesus to describe His physical, social, and spiritual growth as a boy (Luke 2:52). Eli’s House is Rejected – 2:27-36 2:27-36 Three Titles Used for Prophets in God sends a “man of God” to proclaim the judgment on 1 Samuel Eli’s house. This prophet speaks for God and asks rhetorical questions: “Did I indeed reveal myself to the (1) “Man of God” – this title house of your father…? Did I choose him out of all the emphasizes his character tribes of Israel to be my priest…?” (vv. 27-28). The “house” (1 Sam. 2:27; 9:9-10) mentioned refers to Eli’s extended family. Eli’s “father” (2) “Seer” – emphasizes his mentioned here is probably referring to Ithamar, son of ability to “see” truths that Aaron, who was made a priest of the LORD at Mount Sinai most humans could not see along with his father and brothers (Ex. 28:1; cf. 1 Chron. (1 Sam. 9:9) 24:3). Eli was a descendant of this house, according to 1 (3) “Prophet” – emphasizes his Chron. 24:3, where it says that his great-great-great- speaking out the messages grandson Ahimelech was “of the sons of Ithamar.” the LORD gave him (1 Sam. 3:20) The point being made here is that God had given Eli’s family line (including himself and his sons) the unspeakable Priestly Duties Described in v. 28 (1) To go up to the LORD’s altar (e.g., Lev. 1:9) (2) To burn incense on the altar of incense (Ex. 30:1; see also Luke 1:9) (3) To wear an ephod before God (Ex. 28; 1 Sam. 21:9) privilege of being His priests. “I gave to the house of your father all my offerings by fire from the people of Israel” (v. 28). And then comes the condemning question: “Why then so you scorn my sacrifices and my offerings that I commanded, and honor your sons above me by fattening yourselves on the choicest parts of every offering of my people Israel?” (v. 29). Eli cared more for his sons than He did for God; he honored them above the LORD. And the proof was in the fact that all three of them had fattened themselves with the offerings that belonged to God (perhaps this is why Eli was so “heavy,” see 4:18).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Samuel 2:1-2 Like Mary, Hannah Magnified God After Her Son's Birth. I
    1 Samuel 2:1-2 Like Mary, Hannah magnified God after her son’s birth. I. Hannah praised God for His deliverance (2:1). A. She prayed: It was a hymn of thanksgiving. B. She praised God for her deliverance. 4 lines of poetry that Mary borrowed from in her song: 1. My heart exalts in the LORD. a. Heart = throne of her soul b. Exults = to be pumped up i. Her grieving heartache of barrenness is gone. ii. It is replaced with a grateful heart of praise to God. c. In the LORD i. The LORD brought her heart to rejoice. ii. He was the object of her praise. d. Mary was also elated. i. Elizabeth told her that she was carrying the Lord. ii. She used Hannah’s words to express her own soul. iii. Lk 1:46 And Mary said: "My soul exalts the Lord. 2. My horn is exulted in the LORD. a. Horn is a symbol of strength and vitality. i. Horns were used by animals for defense and attack. ii. Some of you have deer horns that picture might. iii. In Hannah’s neck of the woods sheep and oxen horns symbolized strength. b. Hannah credits the LORD for lifting her vitality to bear a child, to give him back to God, and to give her joy. 3. My mouth speaks boldly against my enemies. a. She has much to speak freely about. b. She can speak to Peninnah (1:2) her rival/enemy (1:6), who mocked and ridiculed her weakness. 4. H’s reason for song, strength, & speech is God’s salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept of Kingship
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Jacob Douglas Feeley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Jacob Douglas, "Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2276. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Abstract Scholars who have discussed Josephus’ political philosophy have largely focused on his concepts of aristokratia or theokratia. In general, they have ignored his concept of kingship. Those that have commented on it tend to dismiss Josephus as anti-monarchical and ascribe this to the biblical anti- monarchical tradition. To date, Josephus’ concept of kingship has not been treated as a significant component of his political philosophy. Through a close reading of Josephus’ longest text, the Jewish Antiquities, a historical work that provides extensive accounts of kings and kingship, I show that Josephus had a fully developed theory of monarchical government that drew on biblical and Greco- Roman models of kingship. Josephus held that ideal kingship was the responsible use of the personal power of one individual to advance the interests of the governed and maintain his and his subjects’ loyalty to Yahweh. The king relied primarily on a standard array of classical virtues to preserve social order in the kingdom, protect it from external threats, maintain his subjects’ quality of life, and provide them with a model for proper moral conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biographical Study of Samuel
    Scholars Crossing Old Testament Biographies A Biographical Study of Individuals of the Bible 10-2018 A Biographical Study of Samuel Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/ot_biographies Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "A Biographical Study of Samuel" (2018). Old Testament Biographies. 25. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/ot_biographies/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the A Biographical Study of Individuals of the Bible at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Old Testament Biographies by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Samuel CHRONOLOGICAL SUMMARY I. The pre-ministry of Samuel—A boy in the tabernacle A. Hannah was his mother. 1. Her prayer for her son a. Samuel was born as a result of God’s answering Hannah’s prayer and touching her barren womb (1 Sam. 1:2, 19, 20). b. He was promised to the Lord even before his birth (1 Sam. 1:10-12). c. He became the second of two famous Old Testament Nazarites. Samson was the first (Judg. 13:7, 13-14; 1 Sam. 1:11). 2. Her presentation of her son—After he was weaned, Hannah dedicated him in the tabernacle (1Sam. 1:23-28). B. Eli was his mentor. 1. He then was raised for God’s service by the old priest Eli in the tabernacle (1 Sam. 2:11, 18, 21).
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking the Book #12The Tabernacle
    The W.E.L.L. Stoneybrooke Christian Schools Sherry L. Worel www.sherryworel.com 2012.UTB.12 Unpacking the Book #12The Tabernacle I. An overview There are nearly 470 verses in our bible used to describe the form and furnishings of the Tabernacle and Temple. The bible gives a very specific plan for the building of the tabernacle. However, the temple is not outlined in detail. I Chron. 28:11‐19 does seem to indicate that the Lord gave David some sort of plan or model. The tabernacle was an ornate tent shrine that served the people of Israel for approximately 200 years until it was replaced by Solomon’s temple. This temple served as God’s home for approximately 400 years until the Babylonians destroyed it in 586 BC. When the Israelites returned from Babylon, Zerubbabel over saw the rebuilding of a much inferior temple in 520 BC. This building was damaged and repaired many times until Herod built his “renovation” in 19 BC. The Roman General, Titus destroyed this temple in 70AD. II. The Tabernacle (The Tent of Meeting or Place of Dwelling) A. Consider the New Testament perspective: Hebrews 9:9‐11, 10:1, Col. 2:17 and Revelation 15:5, 21:3 B. Moses was given a model of this meeting house by God Himself (Ex. 25:40) C. The craftsmen Bezalel and Oholiab built this ornate tent. See Ex. 25‐27, 35‐40 for all the details. 1. There was a linen fence that formed an outer courtyard. In that courtyard were two furnishings: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Editions of the Song of Hannah and of Its
    CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE DIFFERENT EDITIONS OF THE SONG OF HANNAH AND OF ITS NARRATIVE FRAMEWORK 1. Introduction The differences between MT (with which T,1 S, and V more or less agree) and the LXX2 in the Song of Hannah are mentioned in the commentaries and in several monographic studies of that poem.3 The sources differ in many small details, as well as in major ones in vv. 1, 2, 6, 9, 10. These major discrepancies consist of differences, omissions, and additions (when using these terms, MT is taken as point of departure without taking a stand regarding the originality of the readings of that text). As far as I know, the differences between MT and the ancient versions of the Song of Hannah and its narrative framework have not been discussed in a monographic treatment,4 with the exception of Walters, “Hannah and Anna” (on the relation between the MT and LXX); nor have the differences between MT and 4QSama been discussed. When deviating from MT, this scroll often agrees with the LXX and/or LXXLuc (see Tov, “Qumran,”* and “4QSama”*). The differences between the Qumran scroll and MT have been put forward in Cross, “New Qumran 1 See D.J. Harrington, “The Apocalypse of Hannah: Targum Jonathan of 1 Samuel 2:1- 10,” in D.M. Golomb (ed.), “Working with No Data,” Semitic and Egyptian Studies Presented to Thomas O. Lambdin (Winona Lake, IN 1987) 147-152. 2 The Old Latin version is more or less identical with the LXX. See in detail P.A.H. de Boer, “Confirmatum est cor meum—Remarks on the Old Latin Text of the Song of Hannah 1 Samuel ii 1-10,” OTS 13 (1963) 173-213; idem, “Once Again the Old Latin Text of Hannah’s Song,” OTS 14 (1965) 206-213.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Lessons from the Seemingly Insignificant #7 Doeg, the Edomite
    Significant Lessons From The Seemingly Insignificant #7 Doeg, the Edomite Ponder: Who would you place on the list of the “bottom 10” people in the Bible? 1. Cain 1st murderer 2. Ahab/Jezebel Evil rulers during Israel’s darkest period 3. Manasseh Child sacrifice 4. Jeroboam I Led the Northern Kingdom into evil and idolatry 5. Herod the Great Slaughterer of children 6. Herodias & Herod Antipas Beheaded John the Baptist 7. Judas Betrayal of Jesus Christ 8. Pontius Pilate Washed his hand of the blood of Jesus Christ 9. Saul Fierce persecutor of Christians 10. Doeg, the Edomite Wreaks havoc; epitome of evil [4 verses in the Bible] Focal Passage: I Samuel 21-22 Scene 1: Ahimelech’s Aid To David – I Sam. 21:1-10 1. David has begun his “life as a fugitive” from Saul; a period of 10 years during which he was “public enemy #1” in all of Israel. 2. David has no weapons or food as he heads into the wilderness. 3. David goes to Nob, the town of the priets and Tabernacle. 4. He meets with Ahimelech, the high priest. [also known as Ahijah; great-grandson of Eli] 5. David’s lies and deception will ultimately bring death to the innocent priests and Ahimelech. 6. Ahimelech was trembling when he met David. “Why are you alone and no one with you?” 7. David’s Deception: The king has sent me on a mission and I am not to tell anyone about the matter. He tells Ahimelech he has left his men at a certain place.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Zechariah 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on Zechariah 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable TITLE AND WRITER The title of this book comes from its traditional writer, as is true of all the prophetical books of the Old Testament. The name "Zechariah" (lit. "Yahweh Remembers") was a common one among the Israelites, which identified at least 27 different individuals in the Old Testament, perhaps 30.1 It was an appropriate name for the writer of this book, because it explains that Yahweh remembers His chosen people, and His promises, and will be faithful to them. This Zechariah was the son of Berechiah, the son of Iddo (1:1, 7; cf. Ezra 5:1; 6:14; Neh. 12:4, 16). Zechariah, like Jeremiah and Ezekiel, was both a prophet and a priest. He was obviously familiar with priestly things (cf. ch. 3; 6:9-15; 9:8, 15; 14:16, 20, 21). Since he was a young man (Heb. na'ar) when he began prophesying (2:4), he was probably born in Babylonian captivity and returned to Palestine very early in life, in 536 B.C. with Zerubbabel and Joshua. Zechariah apparently survived Joshua, the high priest, since he became the head of his own division of priests in the days of Joiakim, the son of Joshua (Neh. 12:12, 16). Zechariah became a leading priest in the restoration community succeeding his grandfather (or ancestor), Iddo, who also returned from captivity in 536 B.C., as the leader of his priestly family (Neh. 12:4, 16). Zechariah's father, Berechiah (1:1, 7), evidently never became prominent.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Zechariah, Volume 2
    EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 VOLUME ZECHARIAH, EXPLORING is second volume of Mark J. Boda’s two-volume set on Zechariah showcases a series of studies tracing the impact of earlier Hebrew Bible traditions on various passages and sections of the book of Zechariah, including 1:7–6:15; 1:1–6 and 7:1–8:23; and 9:1–14:21. e collection of these slightly revised previously published essays leads readers along the argument that Boda has been developing over the past decade. EXPLORING MARK J. BODA is Professor of Old Testament at McMaster Divinity College. He is the author of ten books, including e Book of Zechariah ZECHARIAH, (Eerdmans) and Haggai and Zechariah Research: A Bibliographic Survey (Deo), and editor of seventeen volumes. VOLUME 2 The Development and Role of Biblical Traditions in Zechariah Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Boda Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) Electronic open access edition (ISBN 978-0-88414-201-0) available at http://www.sbl-site.org/publications/Books_ANEmonographs.aspx Cover photo: Zev Radovan/BibleLandPictures.com Mark J. Boda Ancient Near East Monographs Monografías sobre el Antiguo Cercano Oriente Society of Biblical Literature Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente (UCA) EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 ANCIENT NEAR EAST MONOGRAPHS Editors Alan Lenzi Juan Manuel Tebes Editorial Board Reinhard Achenbach C. L. Crouch Esther J. Hamori Chistopher B. Hays René Krüger Graciela Gestoso Singer Bruce Wells Number 17 EXPLORING ZECHARIAH, VOLUME 2 The Development and Role of Biblical Traditions in Zechariah by Mark J.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 and 2 Samuel, by Robert Vannoy, Lecture 1
    1 Dr. Robert Vannoy, Samuels, Lecture 1 © 2011, Dr. Robert Vannoy and Ted Hildebrandt What I want to do in a series of four lectures is speak about the books of First and Second Samuel and see how what is contained in these two important Old Testament books fits into the storyline of the whole of the Bible. So, this is the first of four lectures on First and Second Samuel. When one reads the Old Testament, I think one of the first things that needs to be considered is the literary character or the genre of the material being read. The books of First and Second Samuel, to which we will be giving our attention in these lectures, find their place among what is generally known as the historical books of the Old Testament. Because historical books have a different literary character than, for example, the law books or the poetic books or the wisdom literature, they require a reading strategy that is appropriate to their literary character. So, in these four lectures on First and Second Samuel, I want to begin by saying something about the nature of the historical writing of the Old Testament. I do this because the way in which we understand the nature of Old Testament historiography has a very important influence on the way in which we read and understand the narratives of First and Second Samuel. So let me start by asking a general question: What kind of history writing do we find in the Old Testament? And how does a proper assessment of the character of Old Testament historiography help us to read and understand the narratives of the Old Testament in an appropriate way? I then want to go on to say something more specific about how a proper understanding of the nature of Old Testament historiography helps us to read and understand the books of First and Second Samuel in an appropriate way.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearly Worship and Despair at Shiloh
    FAITH AND DEDICATION 1 Samuel 1:1-28 Episode 2: 1 Samuel 1:3-8 Yearly Worship and Despair at Shiloh LITERAL TRANSLATION TEXT (Biblia Hebraica) 3aAnd-he-went-up this man from-his-city wry(m )whh #$y)h hl(w3a from-days to-days hmymy Mymym to-bow-down and-to-sacrifice xbzlw twxt#$hl to-the-LORD of-hosts in-Shiloh. ..hl#$b tw)bc hwhyl 3band-there two-of sons-of-Eli yl(-ynb yn#$ M#$w3b Hophni and-Phinehas sxnpw ynpx priests to-the-LORD. .hwhyl Mynxk 4aAnd-it-came the-day when-sacrificed Elkanah hnql) xbzyw Mwyh yhyw4a 4bto-Peninnah his-wife he-customarily-gave Ntnw wt#$) hnnpl4b and-to-all-her-sons and-to-her-daughters hytwnbw hynb-lklw portions. .twnm 5aBut-to-Hannah he-customarily-would-give Nty hnxlw5a portion one face Myp) tx) hnm 5bbecause Hannah he-loved bh) hnx-t) yk5b 5calthough-the-LORD had-closed her-womb. .hmxr rns hwhyw5c 6aAnd-she-would-provoke-her her-rival htrc hts(kw6a indeed fiercely in-order to-humiliate-her hm(rh rwb(b s(k-Mg 6bfor-He-closed the-LORD hwhy rgs-yk6b completely her-womb. .hmxr d(b 7aAnd-this it-would-be-done year by-year hn#$b hn#$ h#(y Nkw7a 7bwhenever her-to-go-up in-the-house tybb htl( ydm7b of-the-LORD then-she-would-provoke-her hns(kt Nk hwhy 7cso-she-would-weep and-not she-would-eat. .lk)t )lw hkbtw7c 8aThus-he-said to-her Elkanah her-husband h#$y) hnql) hl rm)yw8a 8bHannah hnx8b 8cWhy you-weep? ykbt hml8c 8dAnd-why not you-eat? ylk)t )l hmlw8d 8eAnd-why it-is-resentful your-heart? Kbbl (ry hmlw8e 8fNot I better to-you than-ten sons? .Mynb hr#(m Kl bw+ ykn) )wlh8f Some explanation about this episode's distinctive temporal sequential of events demands special attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection Or Miraculous Cures? the Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against Its Ancient Near Eastern Background
    Bar, “Resurrection or Miraculous Cures?” OTE 24/1 (2011): 9-18 9 Resurrection or Miraculous Cures? The Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against its Ancient Near Eastern Background SHAUL BAR (UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS) ABSTRACT The Elijah and Elisha cycles have similar stories where the prophet brings a dead child back to life. In addition, in the Elisha story, a corpse is thrown into the prophet’s grave; when it comes into con- tact with one of his bones, the man returns to life. Thus the question is do these stories allude to resurrection, or “only” miraculous cures? What was the purpose of the inclusion of these stories and what message did they convey? In this paper we will show that these are legends that were intended to lend greater credence to prophetic activity and to indicate the Lord’s power over death. A INTRODUCTION There is consensus among scholars that Dan 12:2-3, which they assign to the 1 second century B.C.E., refers to the resurrection of the dead. The question be- comes whether biblical texts earlier than this era allude to this doctrine. The phrase “resurrection of the dead” never appears in the Bible. Scholars searching for biblical allusions to resurrection have cited various idioms.2 They list verbs including “arise,”3 “wake up,”4 and “live,”5 all of which can denote a return to life. We also find “take,”6 which refers to being taken to Heaven, the noun “life,”7 and “see.”8 In the present paper however, we shall examine the stories of the Elijah and Elisha cycles which include similar tales in which the prophet brings a dead child back to life: in Elijah’s case, the son of the widow of Zare- phath (1 Kgs 17:17-24); in Elisha’s, the son of the Shunammite matron (2 Kgs 4:31-37).
    [Show full text]
  • 11-Judges-1 Samuel Notes
    Old Testament History Lesson #11 Judges 8:1-1 Samuel 2:11 Outline I. Cycles Of Apostasy, Judgment, And Deliverance (Judges 2:6-16:31) A. Failure of the judges to maintain Israel’s faithfulness (3:7-16:31). 1. Gideon (6:1-9:57). a) The conquests of Gideon (7:1-8:35). b) Abimelech’s murder of his brothers (9:1-9:57). 2. Tola (10:1-2). 3. Jair (10:3-5). 4. Jephthah (10:6-12:7). 5. Ibzan (12:8-10). 6. Elon (12:11-12). 7. Abdon (12:13-15). 8. Samson (13:1-16:31). B. The extent of Israel’s depravity (17:1-21:24). 1. Idolatry among the Danites (17:1-18:31). 2. Civil war: Israel against Benjamin (19:1-20:24). C. Summary of the condition of Israel (21:25). II. The Story Of Ruth (Ruth 1:1-4:22) A. Naomi loses a family (1:1-5). B. Naomi returns from Moab (1:6-22). 1. Ruth pledges to go with Naomi (1:6-18). 2. Naomi’s bitter return to Bethlehem (1:19-22). C. Ruth goes to work in the fields of Boaz (2:1-23). 1. Ruth begins work (2:1-7). 2. Ruth and Boaz meet (2:8-16). 3. Ruth returns to Naomi (2:17-23). D. Ruth visits Boaz at the threshing floor (3:1-18). 1. Naomi’s instructions (3:1-5). 2. Boaz’s pledge to redeem Ruth (3:6-15). 3. Ruth returns to Naomi (3:14-18). E.
    [Show full text]