Report on the Status of Organic Agriculture and Industry in Moldova

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Status of Organic Agriculture and Industry in Moldova Report on the Status of Organic Agriculture and Industry in Moldova Gefördert durch aufgrund eines Beschlusses des Deutschen Bundestages Imprint Editor Joachim Lenz, Claudia Neumannn EkoConnect e.V. Schützengasse 16 01067 Dresden www.ekoconnect.org Authors Christoph Arndt, Andrei Lozan Proofreading EkoConnect e.V. Translation from German Christoph Arndt Layout & typesetting whateverworks.biz Gefördert durch aufgrund eines Beschlusses des Deutschen Bundestages Disclaimer This report was funded by the German Ministry of Food and Agriculture within the framework of the project 2820OE002. This report has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and belief. We cannot however accept any guarantee for the accuracy, correctness or completeness of the information and data provided. Content A Moldova: Facts and Figures 3 B The Organic Sector in Moldova 8 History National legal frame National support system Organisations Control Bodies Research and training Donor support C Organic Crop Production 16 Certified enterprises and area Organic production and export of organic raw materials Import of organic inputs D Organic Processing and Food Manufacturing 20 Certified enterprises Organic products and export of organic products Import of organic inputs E The Organic Market in Moldova 22 Market size and trends Sales channels and actors Direct sales, Specialised retail and catering, Importers, Supermarket chains F Opportunities 24 Crop and market diversification Primary processing Crop-livestock integration 25 26 A Moldova: Facts and Figures Country 29,400 km 2.6 m (2020)/3.6 m (2009) Area Usual resident population 2.8 Persons 959,200 (2017) Average household size Number of households MDL (19.5 MDL = 1 €, Ø 2019/20) 4011 € (2019) Currency GDP per capita Food market 371 € 9% Expenditure on food per capita and year Expenditure on food (% of GDP per capita) 980 Mio. € (2019) 88% (2019) Turnover in organised food retail trade Level of self-sufficiency 44% (2019)¹ Contribution of agriculture and food to total exports (2019, by value) 1 trademap.org (2019, by value) Source: statistica.md 3 Moldova: Facts and Figures Moldova is one of the largest suppliers to EU for… Apple juice concentrate Rank1 Sunflower seeds / Crude sunflower oil Rank2 Fresh plums Rank3 Source: comtrade.un.org Moldova is one of the largest suppliers to Russia for… Fresh plums Rank1 Fresh apples Rank2 * Dried plums / Honey / Fresh table grapes / Fresh cherries Rank3 Source: comtrade.un.org | * Rank 1 by volume Most important exports (2019) Most important food imports (2019) Export Export Export Import Import Import share of value surplus share of value surplus consumption (million €) (million €) production (%) (million €) (million €) (%) Grains Dairy 52.0 46.8 54% 207.3 187.1 36% (maize, wheat, etc.) Meat 37.3 29.5 77% Sunflower seeds 198.3 176.7 72% Fish 42.2 42.2 100% Sunflower oil 60.3 57.4 86% Vegetables 58.9 50.5 92% Walnuts 80.2 65.8 4% Grain products 45.0 30.2 69% Apples (fresh) 48.0 46.8 36% Source: statistica.md, madein.md, invest.gov.md, eba.md, wineofmoldova.com, agrobiznes.md, FAO Apple juice 41.6 41.5 98% concentrate Stone fruit (fresh) 21.0 18.7 32% Dried plums 6.4 6.3 70% Table grapes (fresh) 26.5 26.1 56% Source: trademap.org 4 Moldova: Facts and Figures Map 2 1 4 Ukraine 3 7 6 5 10 12 9 11 8 13 17 14 16 18 15 19 23 11 22 23 Dnister 21 Prut 20 22 24 27 26 25 11 28 29 30 36 Romania 35 31 33 34 34 32 33 33 Ukraine 33 32 1 BRICENI 7 SOROCA 13 SÎNGEREI 19 CĂLĂRAŞI 25 IALOVENI 31 CANTEMIR 2 OCNIŢA 8 GLODENI 14 FĂLEŞTI 20 NISPORENI 26 HÎNCEŞTI 32 CAHUL 3 EDINEŢ 9 BĂLŢI 15 UNGHENI 21 STRĂŞENI 27 ANENII NOI 33 GĂGĂUZIA 4 DONDUŞENI 10 FLOREŞTI 16 TELENEŞTI 22 CRIULENI 28 CAUŞENI 34 TARACLIA 5 RÎŞCANI 11 TRANSNISTRIA 17 REZINA 23 DUBĂSARI 29 CIMIŞLIA 35 BASARABESCA 6 DROCHIA 12 ŞOLDĂNEŞTI 18 ORHEI 24 CHIŞINĂU 30 LEOVA 36 ŞTEFAN VODĂ Figure 1: Map of Moldova 5 Moldova: Facts and Figures The Transnistria problem In 1992, the strip of land left of the River Dnester (East- maintains a military presence. Although de jure part of ern side) split away from the Republic of Moldova. The the Republic of Moldova, the Government of Moldova so-called Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic comprising has no authority over Transnistria and there is a customs Transnistria with 4163 km² and the town of Bender with border to the break-away territory. Information in this 97 km² (population about 470,000) is not recognised by publication relates to the Republic of Moldova without any other state and under the influence of Russia which Transnistria. Trade relations Moldova is a member of the WTO and has free trade equate sanitary standards. Food products from the EU agreements with EU, CIS, CEFTA, GUAM and Turkey (43 can easily being imported to Moldova with duty rates countries). Negotiations of free trade agreement with between 10% (cheese) and 15% (cereal products). A China and EFTA member states are underway. stepwise liberalisation phase (until 2024) is foreseen for The free trade agreement with EU is called DCFTA certain sensitive products (such as wine, fruits/veget- (Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area) and is part ables, textiles). To reduce trade barriers, Moldova has so of Moldova’s EU Association Agreement that entered into far adopted more than 25,000 EU technical standards force on September 1, 2014. It allows Moldova access to (of 26,496) in its national legislation. At the same time, the European Single Market and grants EU investors the standards (in particular, GOST) that are contradictory to same regulatory environment as in the EU. It eliminates the new European standards are being withdrawn. all custom duties on both sides except for some for The Association Agreement, stimulated the flow of which a gradual elimination is foreseen. Today, the most European FDI into Moldova. In addition, EU and Moldova important fruits produced in Moldova (table grapes, agreed to provide the right of Qualified personnel for tem- apples and plums) are imported into the EU free of cus- porary work. Visa-free travel to the EU started in 2014. toms duties within quotas. The most-favoured-nation DCFTA so far has brought significant increases of (MFN) customs duty rate applies to imports exceeding exports of wine, table grapes, plums, nuts and grains to quota limit. Grains and oil seeds also enjoy duty free ac- the EU. Today, the EU is Moldova's first trading partner cess to the EU. Animal products from Moldova (except and the first investor. About 70% of Moldovan exports are honey) are currently not allowed into the EU due to inad- directed to the EU, and imports represent almost 50%. Climate Moldova’s climate is moderately continental; its proxi- in the north to 400 mm in the south. Precipitation can, mity to the Black Sea leads to mildly cold autumns and however, vary greatly and long dry spells are not unusual. winters as well as relatively cool springs and summers. While Chisinau should enjoy 550 mm on average, there The climate is ideal for apple production with rather pro- were only 218 mm of rain between September 2019 and nounced day-night temperature differences. Problema- August 2020. Heavy showers and thunderstorms are tic for cropping are late night frosts (such as on 1 April typical for early summer. They lead to flooding, erosion 2020 with -12°C) that can destroy a whole year’s stone and damage from hail. Moldova has about 4,000 small fruit crop. water retention dams which are supposed to hold back Annual precipitation ranges from around 600 mm run-off water from heavy showers. 6 Moldova: Facts and Figures Land and soil Moldova’s land-use (2019) Due to its good soils, Moldova’s land-use is character- ised by cropping: 63% of the land cover is used for cropping (the highest in Europe), forest cover is only 14% 14% (the lowest in Europe) and land suitable for live- Land under forest stock grazing only 11%. 12% 11% Other 86% of the land used for cropping land is under arable Land suitable for land use grazing (mostly farming (mostly maize, sunflower and wheat which unused) make up together 80%). 143,000 ha of orchards (mostly apples, followed by stone fruits and walnuts) as well as 126,000 ha of vineyards signify the intensive type of land-use in Moldova (statistica.md). Typical for Moldova are the shelterbelts often made from several rows of walnut or black locust trees every 500 or so meters which were established all over the country in 63% the 1970s and 1980s, but are often poorly maintained. Land used for cropping About 80% of soils are chernozems (black soils) with a thick humus layer (60-100 cm). The average humus content is just above 3% (reaching 7%); however, in- tensive cropping with tillage and no crop rotation has led to a loss of humus content (in general over 1 per- 86% 14 % cent point since 1990). Approximately 0.7 t/ha of Land used for field crops Land used for humus, accumulated over millennia, is lost annually perennial crops (Cerbari, 2015). 33% Land used for maize 24% Land used for sunflower 23% Land used for wheat 20% Land used for other annual crops Source: statistca.md Agriculture Cropping in Moldova is characterised by large commer- of the old kolkhozes), who rented the land from the mul- cial farms. Most production comes from farms >100 ha titude of small land owners, cultivate two thirds to four for field crops and >30 ha for plantation crops.
Recommended publications
  • Skills for Smart Specialisation in Moldova
    SKILLS FOR SMART SPECIALISATION IN MOLDOVA Understanding and managing skills as a key resource for growth and competitiveness Report drafted by Vera Chilari and Corina Gribincea for the European Training Foundation. The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the ETF or the EU institutions. © European Training Foundation, 2021 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was drafted, for the European Training Foundation (ETF), by Vera Chilari and Corina Gribincea. ETF specialists Eva Jansova, Cristina Mereuta and Pirita Vuorinen provided methodological guidance and written contributions. The research would not have been possible without the excellent collaboration and contribution of the National Bureau of Statistics, the Ministry of Education, Culture and Research, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Social Protection, and the National Employment Agency. For this, the ETF is grateful. The ETF and the research team thank all stakeholders interviewed for the purpose of this study, including public institutions, business associations, companies, professional associations and workers. SKILLS FOR SMART SPECIALISATION IN MOLDOVA | 3 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Policy context 6 1.2 Research steps 6 1.3 Moldova – the second pilot country 7 2. METHODOLOGY 10 2.1 Module 1. Skills assessment for the two priority areas 12 2.2 Module 2. Relatedness of qualifications, occupations and skills 15 2.3 Module 3. Assessment and anticipation of the training offer and training needs for selected subsectors 17 2.4 Limitations and considerations revealed by testing in Moldova 17 3. ECONOMIC CONTEXT AND THE ROLE OF SMES IN MOLDOVA 19 3.1 Socio-economic context 19 3.2 Innovation context 20 3.3 The role of SMEs 23 3.4 Employment by occupation and level of education 27 4.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCTAD's National Green Export Review
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT National Green Export Review of the Republic of Moldova: Walnuts, honey and cereals REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Photos credit: ©Fotolia.com Photos credit: © 2018, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development This work is available open access by complying with the Creative Commons licence created for intergovernmental organizations, available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States. The designation employed and the presentation of material on any map in this work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This document has not been formally edited. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2018/6 WALNUTS, HONEY AND CEREALS iii Contents Figures ....................................................................................................................................................iv Tables .....................................................................................................................................................iv Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Smallholders and Family Farms in the Republic of Moldova
    Regional TCP on Empowering Smallholders and Family Farms (TCP/RER/3601) Smallholders and family farms in the Republic of Moldova Country study report 2019 Regional TCP on Empowering Smallholders and Family Farms (TCP/RER/3601) Smallholders and family farms in the Republic of Moldova Country study report 2019 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Budapest, 2020 Regional TCP on Empowering Smallholders and Family Farms (TCP/RER/3601) Smallholders and family farms in the Republic of Moldova Country study report 2019 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Budapest, 2020 Required citation: FAO. 2020. Smallholders and family farms in the Republic of Moldova. Country study report 2019. Budapest. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9836en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-132976-4 © FAO, 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode).
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Land Reform in Moldova
    AGRICULTURAL LAND REFORM IN MOLDOVA Matthew Gorton, Department of Agricultural Economics and Food Marketing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU. United Kingdom. ABSTRACT During transition, Moldova has pursued a policy of small-scale land privatisiation and a sucession of decollectivisation initiatives. Small-scale land reform has been important for bolstering the real incomes of rural households but living standards have continued to fall. While initial political resistance to decollectivisation has been overcome, serious challenges remain for co-ordinating agricultural production, procurement and marketing from a newly fragmented structure of land ownership. The delay in issuing formal land titles has inhibited the development of land market. The former large-scale collective and state farms provided several key social services in rural areas and the delivery of these services in the post- collectivised era also represents a serious challenge. Key Words Land reform, Moldova, Decollectivisation 1. INTRODUCTION Under communism, state and collective farms dominated agricultural production in most Central and Eastern Europe Countries (CEECs). During transition, governments have attempted to reform agricultural production systems by pursuing policies of reorganisation, privatisation and / or land redistribution. However, the nature of land policies has varied significantly between countries (Swinnen, 1999). Moreover, these reform policies have typically taken longer to implement than initially thought and have had unforeseen effects (Swinnen and Tangermann, 1999). Land reform is one area of restructuring which has seemed disappointingly slow despite it been perceived as 'an essential cornerstone' in successful transformation (Lerman et al. 1998; World Bank, 1998a). This issue has been particularly prominent in Moldova where in 1996 agriculture and the food industries accounted for 40% of GDP and employed 50% of the active labour force (World Bank, 1998b).
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Moldova
    AFB/PPRC.24/29 26 February, 2019 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee Twenty-Third Meeting Bonn, Germany, 12-13 March , 2019 Agenda Item 9 v) PROPOSAL FOR MOLDOVA AFB/PPRC.24/29 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully- developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (Annex 5 of the OPG, as amended in March 2016) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO) for Republic of Moldova 20 January 2020 | Adaptation Planning
    with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) for Republic of Moldova 20 January 2020 | Adaptation Planning Programme title: Mainstreaming adaptation into planning processes to reduce vulnerability to climate change at local and central levels in Moldova’s Agriculture Sector (Ag. SAP) Country: Republic of Moldova National designated authority: Ministry of Agriculture, Regional Development and Environment Implementing Institution: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Date of first submission: 15 January 2019 Date of current submission/ 16 December 2019 V.3 version number Readiness and Preparatory Support Page 2 of 55 How to complete this document? - Please visit the Empowering Countries page of the GCF website to download the Readiness Guidebook and learn how to access funding under the GCF Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme. - This document should be completed by National Designated Authorities (NDA) or focal points with support from their Delivery Partners where relevant. Once completed, this document should be submitted to the GCF by the NDA or focal point to [email protected]. - Please be concise. If you need to include any additional information, please attach it to the proposal. - If the Delivery Partner implementing the Readiness support is not a GCF Accredited Entity for project Funding Proposals, please complete the Financial Management Capacity Assessment (FMCA) questionnaire and submit it prior to or with this Readiness proposal. The FMCA is available for download at the Library page of the GCF website. Where to get support? - If you are not sure how to complete this document, or require support, please send an e-mail to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Potential of Organic Agriculture in the Republic of Moldova
    The Status and Potential of Organic Agriculture in the Republic of Moldova A background document for the Greening Economies in the Eastern Neighbourhood (EaP-GREEN) partnership programme Photo: Flickr/Creative Commons/U.S. Embassy Moldova Table of contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive summary ........................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Moldova’s agricultural sector ...................................................................................................... 7 Agricultural policy ........................................................................................................................ 10 Trade .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Organic agriculture in Moldova ..................................................................................................... 14 National policies..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US Department of State Self Study Guide for Moldova, March 2002
    Description of document: US Department of State Self Study Guide for Moldova, March 2002 Requested date: 11-March-2007 Released date: 25-Mar-2010 Posted date: 19-April-2010 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Office of Information Programs and Services A/GIS/IPS/RL U. S. Department of State Washington, D. C. 20522-8100 Fax: 202-261-8579 Note: This is one of a series of self-study guides for a country or area, prepared for the use of USAID staff assigned to temporary duty in those countries. The guides are designed to allow individuals to familiarize themselves with the country or area in which they will be posted. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Pluguşorul (“Little Plough”) and Semănatul (“Sowing”) – Music Categories Belonging to Carol Singing As a Folklore Genre
    Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series VIII: Performing Arts • Vol. 7 (56) No. 1 - 2014 PLUGUŞORUL (“LITTLE PLOUGH”) AND SEMĂNATUL (“SOWING”) – MUSIC CATEGORIES BELONGING TO CAROL SINGING AS A FOLKLORE GENRE. AREA OF DÂMBOVIŢA C. BOGHICI1 S. BOGHICI2 Abstract: The Romanian carol is still enjoying a great popularity, appearing as a great variety of customs, traditions and faiths transmitted from generation to generation. The customs called Pluguşorul and Semănat are part of the winter repertoire and take place between 24 December and 7 January, belonging to the carol genre. The customs related to the archaic plowing and sowing are some of the oldest and most beautiful Romanian traditions, pursuing to assure - through imitative magic - the abundance and welfare of the Romanian villages’ inhabitants. Their origins get lost in the darkness of history – coming probably from the Thracians, Agathyrsi (the Dacian’s ancestors), and Getho- Dacians, whose musical talent was mentioned by the great scholars of those times. While Pluguşorul (Little Plough) and Plugul Mare (Big Plough) are practiced on New Year’s Eve, Semănatul (Sowing) takes place on the following day, on Saint Basil’s Day, marking in this way the beginning of a new agricultural year, through magical acts meant to trigger the earth’s fertility. The organization in groups, the ritual, the structural elements (lyrics, melody, rhythm, ambitus, archaic sound systems), the props (petadou /friction drum, oxen, plough) suggest the whole unfolding of the agricultural works in the rural archaic communities, starting with plowing, sowing, reaping and grinding of the wheat out of which the bagels that reward the carol singers are made.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 301.22 Kb
    S P E C I A L R E P O R T FAO/WFP CROP AND FOOD SUPPLY ASSESSMENT MISSION TO MOLDOVA 25 September 2007 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, ROME WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME, ROME - ii - This report has been prepared by Aziz Arya, Henri Josserand, Asif Niazi and Gerard Rebello under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP Secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required. Henri Josserand Naila Sabra Chief, GIEWS, FAO Regional Director, ODC, WFP Fax: 0039-06-5705-4495 Fax:00202 2528 2735 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Please note that this Special Report is also available on the Internet as part of the FAO World Wide Web (www.fao.org) at the following URL address: http://www.fao.org/giews/ The Special Alerts/Reports can also be received automatically by E-mail as soon as they are published, by subscribing to the GIEWS/Alerts report ListServ. To do so, please send an E-mail to the FAO-Mail-Server at the following address: [email protected], leaving the subject blank, with the following message: subscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L To be deleted from the list, send the message: unsubscribe GIEWSAlertsWorld-L Please note that it is now possible to subscribe to regional lists to only receive Special Reports/Alerts by region: Africa, Asia, Europe or Latin America (GIEWSAlertsAfrica-L, GIEWSAlertsAsia-L, GIEWSAlertsEurope-L and GIEWSAlertsLA-L). These lists can be subscribed to in the same way as the worldwide list.
    [Show full text]
  • (Aced) Project Gender Assessment
    ACED Agricultural Competitiveness and Enterprise Development Project ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GROWING MOLDOVANFINAL HIGH VALUE AGRICULTUREUSAID/MOLDOVA AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL COMPETITIVENESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT COMPETITIVENESS AND PROJECT (ACED) ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT (ACED) PROJECT GENDER ASSESSMENT SEPTEMBER 2011 This plan is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the sole responsibility of DAI and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID September 14, 2011 or the United States Government This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Development & Training Services, Inc. (dTS). ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GROWING MOLDOVAN HIGH VALUE AGRICULTURE Program Title: AGRICULTURAL COMPETITIVENESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (ACED) Sponsoring USAID Office: USAID Moldova Contract Number: AID-117-C-11-00001 Contractor: DAI Date of Publication: September 2011 Author: Development & Training Services, Inc. (dTS) in cooperation with National Federation of Agricultural Producers from Moldova (AGROinform) and DAI The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Migration: Benefits, Prospects, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Report No. 55195-MD Report No. 55195-MD Moldova After the Global Crisis Promoting Competitiveness and Shared Growth Public Disclosure Authorized June 14, 2011 Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Moldova After the Global Crisis Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized MOLDOVA - GOVERNMENT FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective as of June 14, 2011) Currency Unit = Moldovan Leu US$1.00 = 11.3552 (MDL) Weights and Measures Metric System ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CAS Country Assistance Strategy LFS Labor Force Survey CEM Country Economic Memorandum MDGs Millennium Development Goals CFAA Country Financial Accountability MOE Ministry of Education Assessment CIS Commonwealth of Independent States MOF Ministry of Finance DPL Development Policy Loan MOH Ministry of Health ECA Europe and Central Asia MTEF Medium-Term Expenditure Framework ETF European Training Foundation NBM National Bank of Moldova FDI Foreign Direct Investment NPL Non-Performing Loan FSAP Foreign Sector Assessment Program PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Assessment GDP Gross Domestic Product PER Public Expenditure Review GNP Gross National Product PFM Public Financial Management GOST Gusudarstyennyy Standart IFRS International Financing Reporting Standards IFC International Finance Corporation TFP Total Factor Productivity IMF International Monetary Fund UNDP United Nations Development Program LDP Letter
    [Show full text]