World Bank Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Bank Document WORLD BANK DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 398 Work in progress D PS for public discussion ; M;t Public Disclosure Authorized Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Moldova Pro g,rZfssa (1/1( Prospa- Is Public Disclosure Authorized 2 lor-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized (#:\t/l)tz~~ ,,/ ~~~ (*: t~ ~~ 'f(9/}lo Public Disclosure Authorized I. iro1I loo,:(, Recent World Bank Discussion Papers No. 325 Institutional and Entrepreneurial Leadership in the Brazilian Science and Technology Sector:Setting a New Agenda . Edited by Lauritz Holm-Nielsen, Michael Crawford, and Alcyone Saliba No. 326 The East Asian Miracle and Information Technology: Strategic Management of TechnologicalLearning. Nagy Hanna, Sandor Boyson, and Shakuntala Gunaratne No. 327 Agricultural Reform in Russia: A Viewfrom the Farm Level. Karen Brooks, Elmira Krylatykh, Zvi Lerman, Aleksandr Petrikov, and Vasilii Uzun No. 328 Insuring Sovereign Debt Againist Default. David F Babbel No. 329 Managing Transboundary Stocks of Small Pelagic Fish: Problems and Options. Max Agiuero and Exequiel Gonzalez No. 330 China: Issues and Options in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Control. Edited by Todd M. Johnson, Junfeng Li, Zhongxiao Jiang, and Robert P. Taylor No. 331 Case Studies in War-to-Peace Transition: The Demobilization and Reintegration of Ex-Combatants in Ethiopia, Namibia, and Uganda. Nat J. Colletta, Markus Kostner, Ingo Wiederhofer, with the assistance of Emilio Mondo, Taimi Sitari, and Tadesse A. Woldu No. 333 Participation in Practice: The Experience of the World Bank and Other Stakeholders. Edited by Jennifer Rietbergen- McCracken No. 334 Managing Price Risk in the Pakistan Wheat Market. Rashid Faruqee and Jonathan R. Coleman No. 335 Policy Optionsfor Reform of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. Edited by Harry G. Broadman No. 336 Targeted Credit Programs and Rural Poverty in Bangladesh. Shahidur Khandker and Osman H. Chowdhury No. 337 The Role of Family Planning and Targeted Credit Programs in Demographic Change in Bangladesh. Shahidur R. Khand- ker and M. Abdul Latif No. 338 Cost Sharing in the Social Sectors of Sub-Saharan Africa: Impact on the Poor. Arvil Van Adams and Teresa Hartnett No. 339 Public and Private Roles in Health: Theory and Financing Patterns. Philip Musgrove No. 340 Developing the Nonfarm Sector in Bangladesh: Lessonsfrom Other Asian Countries. Shahid Yusuf and Praveen Kumar No. 341 Beyond Privatization: The Second Wave of Telecommunications Reforms in Mexico. Bjorn Wellenius and Gregory Staple No. 342 Economic Integration and Trade Liberalization in Southern Africa: Is There a Rolefor South Africa? Merle Holden No. 343 Financing Private Infrastructure in Developing Countries. David Ferreira and Karman Khatami No. 344 Transport and the Village: Findingsfrom African Village-Level Travel and Transport Surveys and Related Studies. Ian Barwell No. 345 On the Road to EU Accession: Financial Sector Development in Central Europe. Michael S. Borish, Wei Ding, and Michel Noel No. 346 Structural Aspects of Manufacturing in Sub-Saharan Africa: Findings from a Seven Country Enterprise Survey. Tyler Biggs and Pradeep Srivastava No. 347 Health Reform in Africa: Lessonsfrom Sierra Leone. Bruce Siegel, David Peters, and Sheku Kamara No. 348 Did External Barriers Cause the Marginalization of Sub-Saharan Africa in World Trade? Azita Amjadi Ulrich Reincke, and Alexander J. Yeats No. 349 Surveillance of Agricultural Price and Trade Policy in Latin America during Major Policy Reforms. Alberto Valdes No. 350 Who Benefitsfrom Public Education Spending in Malawi: Resultsfrom the Recent Education Reform. Florencia Castro- Leal No. 351 From Universal Food Subsidies to a Self-Targeted Program: A Case Study in Tunisian Reform. Laura Tuck and Kathy Lindert No. 352 China's Urban Transport Development Strategy: Proceedings of a Symposium in Beijing, November 8-10, 1995. Edited by Stephen Stares and Liu Zhi No. 353 Telecommunications Policiesfor Sub-Saharan Africa. Mohammad A. Mustafa, Bruce Laidlaw, and Mark Brand No. 354 Saving across the World: Puzzles and Policies. Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel and Luis Serven No. 355 Agriculture and German Reunification. Ulrich E. Koester and Karen M. Brooks No. 356 Evaluating Health Projects: Lessonsfrom the Literature. Susan Stout, Alison Evans, Janet Nassim, and Laura Raney, with substantial contributions from Rudolpho Bulatao, Varun Gauri, and Timothy Johnston No. 357 Innovations and Risk Taking: The Engine of Reform in Local Government in Latin America and the Caribbean. Tim Campbell No. 358 China's Non-Bank Financial Institutions:Trust and Investment Companies. Anjali Kumar, Nicholas Lardy, William Albrecht, Terry Chuppe, Susan Selwyn, Paula Perttunen, and Tao Zhang (Continued on the inside back cover) WORLD BANK DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 398 Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Moldova Progressand Prospects Zv Lerman CsabaCsaki VictorMoroz TheWorld Bank WashinSon,D.C. Copyright C 1998 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433,U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing August 1998 Discussion Papers present results of country analysis or research that are circulated to encourage discussion and comment within the development community The typescript of this paper therefore has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to mem- bers of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guaran- tee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this vol- ume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Requests for permission to reproduce portions of it should be sent to the Office of the Publisher at the address shown in the copyright notice above. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally give permission promptly and, when the reproduction is for noncommercial purposes, without asking a fee. Permission to copy portions for classroom use is granted through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., Suite 910, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923,U.S.A. ISSN: 0259-210X Cover photo: "Woman with vegetables," Mihai Potarniche (Moldova 1997). Zvi Lerman is a professor at Hebrew University, Jerusalem. Csaba Csaki is lead agricultural adviser in the Rural Development/Environment Sector Unit of the World Bank's Europe and Central Asia Region. Vic- tor Moroz is deputy director of the Agricultural Restructuring Agency of Moldova. Libraryof Congress Cataloging-in-PublicationData Lerman, Zvi, 1941- Land reform and farm restructuring in Moldova: progress and prospects / Zvi Lerman, Csaba Csaki, Victor Moroz. p. cm. - (World Bank discussion paper, ISSN 0259-210X;no. 398) Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN0-82134317-3 1. Land reform-Moldova. 2. Agriculture-Economic aspects- Moldova. 3. Farms-Moldova. 4. Privatization-Moldova. I. Csaki, Csaba. II. Moroz, Victor, 1950- .III. Title. IV.Series: World Bank discussion papers; 398. HD1333.M629L47 1998 333.3'1476-dc2l 98-27897 CIP Contents Foreword ....................... ix Preface .. xi Abstract ....................... xv Executive Summary .. xvii Chapter 1 Privatization of Agriculture in Moldova: Main Findings. Chapter 2 Current State of Land Reform: National Overview ....................... 11 Chapter 3 The Legal Fiamework for Land Reform and Farm Restructuring ..... ....... 27 Chapter 4 Reorganization o:fLarge Collectives: A Break with Socialist Tradition? ...... 37 Chapter 5 Members of Large Collectives in the Midst of Reform .................... 57 Chapter 6 Peasant Farms: The Emergence of True Private Agriculture ..... ........... 69 Chapter 7 Rural Social Services in Transition ................................... 91 Selected References on Land Reform and Farm Restructuringin Transition Economies .. 95 List of Figures Figure I Annual Family Income: 1996 .............. ................. xviii Figure II Disposition of Land Shares ................................... xx Figure 1.1 Members' Assessment of Reorganization Outcomes ................ 4 Figure 1.2 Product Mix: Collectives and Private Farms ........ ............... 5 Figure 1.3 Commercial Orientation of Producers: Percentage of Output Sold and Consumed on Farm .................................... 6 Figure 1.4 Change of Family Situation Since Becoming a Farmer ...... ......... 9 Figure 1.5 Expected Changes of Family Situation in Next 2-3 Years ..... ....... 9 Figure 1.6 What the Family Income Buys? ................................. 9 Figure 2.1 Land Ownership ........................................ 13 Figure 2.2 Land Tenure by Sector: 1990-1997 ............................. 13 Figure 2.3 Gross Agricultural Product: 1990-1996 .......................... 21 Figure 2.4 Share of Individual Sector in Production ......................... 22 Figure
Recommended publications
  • Joint Submission of the Promo-Lex Association and Anti-Discrimination Centre Memorial
    JOINT SUBMISSION OF THE PROMO-LEX ASSOCIATION AND ANTI-DISCRIMINATION CENTRE MEMORIAL Information submitted to the 62 Session (18 Sep 2017 - 06 Oct 2017) of the Committee on the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights August 2017 Promo-LEX Association is a non-governmental organization that aims to advance democracy in the Republic of Moldova, including in the Transnistrian region, by promoting and defending human rights, monitoring the democratic processes, and strengthening civil society through a strategic mix of legal action, advocacy, research and capacity building. Anti-Discrimination Centre Memorial works on protection of the rights of discriminated minorities and vulnerable groups in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, carrying out monitoring, reporting, advocacy on local and international level, human rights education. CONTACTS DUMITRU SLIUSARENCO STEPHANIA Kulaeva Promo-LEX Association ADC Memorial [email protected] [email protected] Of. Bd. Stefan cel Mare 127, Chisinau, R. Moldova ADC Memorial, Mundo B, rue d’Edimbourg, 1050 Brussels, Belgium 0 CONTENTS CHAPTER I. WOMEN’S RIGHT TO WORK ................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................... 2 DISCRIMINATORY LEGAL PROVISIONS ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Skills for Smart Specialisation in Moldova
    SKILLS FOR SMART SPECIALISATION IN MOLDOVA Understanding and managing skills as a key resource for growth and competitiveness Report drafted by Vera Chilari and Corina Gribincea for the European Training Foundation. The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the ETF or the EU institutions. © European Training Foundation, 2021 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was drafted, for the European Training Foundation (ETF), by Vera Chilari and Corina Gribincea. ETF specialists Eva Jansova, Cristina Mereuta and Pirita Vuorinen provided methodological guidance and written contributions. The research would not have been possible without the excellent collaboration and contribution of the National Bureau of Statistics, the Ministry of Education, Culture and Research, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Social Protection, and the National Employment Agency. For this, the ETF is grateful. The ETF and the research team thank all stakeholders interviewed for the purpose of this study, including public institutions, business associations, companies, professional associations and workers. SKILLS FOR SMART SPECIALISATION IN MOLDOVA | 3 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Policy context 6 1.2 Research steps 6 1.3 Moldova – the second pilot country 7 2. METHODOLOGY 10 2.1 Module 1. Skills assessment for the two priority areas 12 2.2 Module 2. Relatedness of qualifications, occupations and skills 15 2.3 Module 3. Assessment and anticipation of the training offer and training needs for selected subsectors 17 2.4 Limitations and considerations revealed by testing in Moldova 17 3. ECONOMIC CONTEXT AND THE ROLE OF SMES IN MOLDOVA 19 3.1 Socio-economic context 19 3.2 Innovation context 20 3.3 The role of SMEs 23 3.4 Employment by occupation and level of education 27 4.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCTAD's National Green Export Review
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT National Green Export Review of the Republic of Moldova: Walnuts, honey and cereals REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Photos credit: ©Fotolia.com Photos credit: © 2018, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development This work is available open access by complying with the Creative Commons licence created for intergovernmental organizations, available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States. The designation employed and the presentation of material on any map in this work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This document has not been formally edited. UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2018/6 WALNUTS, HONEY AND CEREALS iii Contents Figures ....................................................................................................................................................iv Tables .....................................................................................................................................................iv Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Joint Integrated Local Development Programme Final Report 01 January 2010 – 31 December 2012 February, 2013 1 Programme Title: JOINT INTEGRATED LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Projects Number: 00058776 Programme Duration: 3 years (January 2010 – December 2012) Reporting Period: January 2010 – December 2012 Programme Budget: 7,800,000 USD Country: Republic of Moldova Donor: The Government of Sweden Executing Agency: UNDP, UN Women 2 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 I. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Programme objectives and components ................................................................................................................. 10 Moldova – country situation ........................................................................................................................................ 11 II. KEY RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smallholders and Family Farms in the Republic of Moldova
    Regional TCP on Empowering Smallholders and Family Farms (TCP/RER/3601) Smallholders and family farms in the Republic of Moldova Country study report 2019 Regional TCP on Empowering Smallholders and Family Farms (TCP/RER/3601) Smallholders and family farms in the Republic of Moldova Country study report 2019 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Budapest, 2020 Regional TCP on Empowering Smallholders and Family Farms (TCP/RER/3601) Smallholders and family farms in the Republic of Moldova Country study report 2019 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Budapest, 2020 Required citation: FAO. 2020. Smallholders and family farms in the Republic of Moldova. Country study report 2019. Budapest. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9836en The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-132976-4 © FAO, 2020 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode).
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market
    GENDER DIFFERENCES ON SUB-NATIONAL LEVEL IN MOLDOVA Nina Chesnokova National Statistical Bureau March 2014, Geneva Need for comparative gender analysis at subnational level Law on Regional Development setting out main regional development objectives, principles, frameworks and planning instruments Government Programme "European Integration: Freedom, Democracy, Prosperity" Moldavian National Demographic Security Strategy Gender Disparities in Politics Results of latest local elections: Gender disparities at registration phase: 4,204 candidates to Mayors and Vice Mayors, including 843 females (20%) were registered and only one in four female candidate was elected. The largest representation of female candidates was in the local administration of the Southern Zone - 25%, and in Cimislia District of the zone it was 42%. However, only 7 out of 53 female candidates were elected in the region. Female candidates are mostly successful in elections of District, Rural and Municipal Councillors: up to 40% were elected in some regions. However, in some administrative areas there are less than 20% of female councillors. Only 3 women were elected District Chairpersons - one in each of three regions: North, Centre and South, which is only 8.8% of total number of Chairpersons. Population Size and Structure About 30% of the population live both in the Northern and Central Zones, over 15% live in the Southern Zone and the population of Gagauzia is about 5% of the total population of the country. Residents of Chișinău Municipality comprise about a fifth of the total population of the country. Steady depopulation trends prevail in three regions: Centre, South and especially North. 51.9% of the total population are women and 48.1% are men.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Land Reform in Moldova
    AGRICULTURAL LAND REFORM IN MOLDOVA Matthew Gorton, Department of Agricultural Economics and Food Marketing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU. United Kingdom. ABSTRACT During transition, Moldova has pursued a policy of small-scale land privatisiation and a sucession of decollectivisation initiatives. Small-scale land reform has been important for bolstering the real incomes of rural households but living standards have continued to fall. While initial political resistance to decollectivisation has been overcome, serious challenges remain for co-ordinating agricultural production, procurement and marketing from a newly fragmented structure of land ownership. The delay in issuing formal land titles has inhibited the development of land market. The former large-scale collective and state farms provided several key social services in rural areas and the delivery of these services in the post- collectivised era also represents a serious challenge. Key Words Land reform, Moldova, Decollectivisation 1. INTRODUCTION Under communism, state and collective farms dominated agricultural production in most Central and Eastern Europe Countries (CEECs). During transition, governments have attempted to reform agricultural production systems by pursuing policies of reorganisation, privatisation and / or land redistribution. However, the nature of land policies has varied significantly between countries (Swinnen, 1999). Moreover, these reform policies have typically taken longer to implement than initially thought and have had unforeseen effects (Swinnen and Tangermann, 1999). Land reform is one area of restructuring which has seemed disappointingly slow despite it been perceived as 'an essential cornerstone' in successful transformation (Lerman et al. 1998; World Bank, 1998a). This issue has been particularly prominent in Moldova where in 1996 agriculture and the food industries accounted for 40% of GDP and employed 50% of the active labour force (World Bank, 1998b).
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Business Environment Development Index 2016
    IDIS Viitorul INEKO Regional Business Environment Development Index 2016 Authors Liubomir Chiriac, PhD, Vice Director IDIS Viitorul Tatiana Lariusin, PhD, Senior Economist, IDIS Viitorul Ion Butmalai, Economist, IDIS Viitorul Peter Golias, PhD, Director, INEKO Official Development Assistance of the Slovak Republic is an intrinsic instrument of the Slovak foreign policy, which to a large extent shapes Slovakia’s relations with aid recipients and relevant international organizations. Having committed itself to the fulfillment of the Millennium Development Goals, Slovakia shares the responsibility for global development and poverty reduction endeavors in developing countries, aiming to promote their sustainable development. INEKO Institute is a non-governmental non-profit organization established in support of economic and social reforms which aim to remove barriers to the long-term positive development of the Slovak economy and society. Mission The Institute’s mission is to support a rational and efficient economic and social reform process in the Slovak Republic (SR), through research, information development and dissemination, advice to senior government, political and selfgoverning officials, and promotion of the public discourse. It also focuses on those areas of social policy on the regional as well as the European level critical to the economic transformation of the SR. It draws on the best experience available from other transition countries and members of the European Union (EU) and the OECD. Regional Business Environment Development Index 2016 Authors Liubomir Chiriac, PhD, Vice Director IDIS Viitorul Tatiana Lariusin, PhD, Senior Economist, IDIS Viitorul IDIS is an independent think tank, established in 1993 as a Ion Butmalai, Economist, IDIS Viitorul research and advocacy think tank, incorporated by Moldovan Peter Golias, PhD, Director, INEKO laws on non-for-profit and NGOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Democracy and Human Rights PROMO-LEX ASSOCIATION
    advancing democracy and human rights THE CIVIC COALITION FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS PROMO-LEX ASSOCIATION REPORT #3 Monitoring the preterm parliamentary elections of 28 November 2010 Monitoring period: 26 October 2010 – 8 November 2010 Published on 11 November 2010 Promo-LEX is grateful for the financial and technical assistance offered by the United States of America Embassy in Chisinau, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the donors. Page 1 of 28 Third monitoring report on the preterm parliamentary elections of 28 November 2010 CONTENTS: I. SUMMARY II. PROMO-LEX MONITORING EFFORT III. INTRODUCTION A. Legal framework B. Electoral competitors C. Election authorities D. Local authorities E. Electoral campaigning F. Financial analysis G. Mass media H. National and international observers I. Transnistrian region IV. CONCERNS V. RECOMMENDATIONS Page 2 of 28 I. SUMMARY This report, covering the period from October 25 through November 8, 2010, describes the electoral environment and reviews from a legal perspective the recent developments in the election campaign, and the performance of the electoral competitors and of the local and election authorities. The election campaign is becoming increasingly intense, with cases of intimidation and abuse being registered both against electoral competitors and voters. While engaged in various campaigning activities, some candidates resort to the misuse of administrative resources and offering of “electoral gifts”. Promo-LEX salutes the impartiality of the election authorities in performing their duties. The Central Election Commission registered until the end of the authorization period 40 electoral competitors and issued warnings to the contenders that violated the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Indication
    Geographical Indication (GI) – a geographi- Geographical Indication (GI) – a geographi- Geographical Indication (GI) – a geographi- cal / non-geographical name, used to des- cal / non-geographical name, used to des- cal / non-geographical name, used to des- ignate a product which possesses a specific ignate a product which possesses a specific ignate a product which possesses a specific quality, reputation or other characteristics quality, reputation or other characteristics quality, reputation or other characteristics attributable to its geographical origin. attributable to its geographical origin. attributable to its geographical origin. Designation of Origin (DO) – a geographi- Designation of Origin (DO) – a geographi- Designation of Origin (DO) – a geographi- cal / non-geographical name, used to desig- cal / non-geographical name, used to desig- cal / non-geographical name, used to desig- nate a product, the quality or characteristics nate a product, the quality or characteristics nate a product, the quality or characteristics of which are essentially or exclusively due of which are essentially or exclusively due of which are essentially or exclusively due to the particular geographical environment to the particular geographical environment to the particular geographical environment with its inherent natural and human factors. with its inherent natural and human factors. with its inherent natural and human factors. Producers Competent Authority Producers Competent Authority Producers Competent Authority • Establish a group (an association of producers The competent authority (MAFI, Ministry • Establish a group (an association of producers The competent authority (MAFI, Ministry • Establish a group (an association of producers The competent authority (MAFI, Ministry or processors) and approve the statute. of Culture or Ministry of Environment etc.), or processors) and approve the statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Moldova
    AFB/PPRC.24/29 26 February, 2019 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee Twenty-Third Meeting Bonn, Germany, 12-13 March , 2019 Agenda Item 9 v) PROPOSAL FOR MOLDOVA AFB/PPRC.24/29 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully- developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (Annex 5 of the OPG, as amended in March 2016) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO) for Republic of Moldova 20 January 2020 | Adaptation Planning
    with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) for Republic of Moldova 20 January 2020 | Adaptation Planning Programme title: Mainstreaming adaptation into planning processes to reduce vulnerability to climate change at local and central levels in Moldova’s Agriculture Sector (Ag. SAP) Country: Republic of Moldova National designated authority: Ministry of Agriculture, Regional Development and Environment Implementing Institution: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Date of first submission: 15 January 2019 Date of current submission/ 16 December 2019 V.3 version number Readiness and Preparatory Support Page 2 of 55 How to complete this document? - Please visit the Empowering Countries page of the GCF website to download the Readiness Guidebook and learn how to access funding under the GCF Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme. - This document should be completed by National Designated Authorities (NDA) or focal points with support from their Delivery Partners where relevant. Once completed, this document should be submitted to the GCF by the NDA or focal point to [email protected]. - Please be concise. If you need to include any additional information, please attach it to the proposal. - If the Delivery Partner implementing the Readiness support is not a GCF Accredited Entity for project Funding Proposals, please complete the Financial Management Capacity Assessment (FMCA) questionnaire and submit it prior to or with this Readiness proposal. The FMCA is available for download at the Library page of the GCF website. Where to get support? - If you are not sure how to complete this document, or require support, please send an e-mail to [email protected].
    [Show full text]