Duquesne Studies, Spiritan Series 1: a History of the Congregation of The
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Insular Autonomy: a Framework for Conflict Settlement? a Comparative Study of Corsica and the Åland Islands
INSULAR AUTONOMY: A FRAMEWORK FOR CONFLICT SETTLEMENT? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CORSICA AND THE ÅLAND ISLANDS Farimah DAFTARY ECMI Working Paper # 9 October 2000 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg . Germany % +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper # 9 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Marc Weller Issue Editors: Farimah Daftary and William McKinney © European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) 2000. ISSN 1435-9812 i The European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) is a non-partisan institution founded in 1996 by the Governments of the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German State of Schleswig-Holstein. ECMI was established in Flensburg, at the heart of the Danish-German border region, in order to draw from the encouraging example of peaceful coexistence between minorities and majorities achieved here. ECMI’s aim is to promote interdisciplinary research on issues related to minorities and majorities in a European perspective and to contribute to the improvement of inter-ethnic relations in those parts of Western and Eastern Europe where ethno- political tension and conflict prevail. ECMI Working Papers are written either by the staff of ECMI or by outside authors commissioned by the Centre. As ECMI does not propagate opinions of its own, the views expressed in any of its publications are the sole responsibility of the author concerned. ECMI Working Paper # 9 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) © ECMI 2000 CONTENTS I. -
The Impeded Archipelago of Corsica and Sardinia
Island Studies Journal, 16(1), 2021, 325-342 The impeded archipelago of Corsica and Sardinia Marcel A. Farinelli Independent researcher [email protected] Abstract: Sardinia (Italy) and Corsica (France) are two islands divided by a strait that is 13 km wide. Their inhabitants have had commercial and cultural links at least since the Bronze Age, facing similar historical processes such as colonization from mainland powers during Middle Ages and a problematic assimilation within the nation-states to which the islands are nowadays associated. Nevertheless, they are generally perceived and analyzed as separate and distant islands. This is a consequence of the geopolitical context of the last three centuries, during which Corsica and Sardinia have become part of two separate states marked by a troubled relationship. This study has two main purposes: explaining the case of the two islands through a historical analysis of the island-to-island relationship between the 17th and 21st Centuries and proposing the concept of ‘impeded archipelago’ to describe analogous situations. Keywords: archipelago, Corsica, islands, island-to-island relationship, nationalism, Sardinia https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.142 • Received August 2020, accepted December 2020 © Island Studies Journal, 2021 Introduction Few scholars have adopted an archipelagic perspective on Corsica (France) and Sardinia (Italy), albeit the strait that divides them (The Strait of Bonifacio) in its narrow point is 13 km wide. Sardinians and Corsicans have had economic and cultural ties at least since the Bronze Age, they experienced colonization from continental powers during Middle Ages and Modern Era, and they shared a problematic integration process in the mainland country to which they are linked with since the 18th and 19th Centuries. -
Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy
Structure and operation of local and regional democracy France Situation in 1997 Council of Europe Publishing French edition: Structure et fonctionnement de la démocratie locale et régionale: France ISBN 92-871-3665-3 Studies appearing in the series “Structure and operation of local and regional democracy”: 1st edition 1992: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland 1993: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Malta, Turkey, United Kingdom. 2nd edition The second edition of the files was started in 1996. It will include an individual study for each of the member states of the Council of Europe. Already published: Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, France, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland. For further information, please contact: Territorial Authorities, Transfrontier Co-operation and Regional Planning Division Directorate of Environment and Local Authorities Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Tel.: +33 (0)3 88 41 22 36 Fax: +33 (0)3 88 41 27 84 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is mentioned Council of Europe Publishing F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex ISBN 92-871-3666-1 © Council of Europe, June 1998 Printed at the Council of Europe 3 CONTENTS Page 1. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Constitutional provisions................................................................................................ -
The Paradox of Gendarmeries: Between Expansion, Demilitarization and Dissolution
0088 CCOUVERTUREOUVERTURE pp1X.ai1X.ai 1 229-10-139-10-13 33:49:51:49:51 PPMM SSR PAPER 8 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K The Paradox of Gendarmeries: Between Expansion, Demilitarization and Dissolution Derek Lutterbeck DCAF DCAF a centre for security, development and the rule of law SSR PAPER 8 The Paradox of Gendarmeries: Between Expansion, Demilitarization and Dissolution Derek Lutterbeck DCAF The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. The Centre develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in‐country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. SSR Papers is a flagship DCAF publication series intended to contribute innovative thinking on important themes and approaches relating to security sector reform (SSR) in the broader context of security sector governance (SSG). Papers provide original and provocative analysis on topics that are directly linked to the challenges of a governance‐driven security sector reform agenda. SSR Papers are intended for researchers, policy‐makers and practitioners involved in this field. ISBN 978‐92‐9222‐286‐4 © 2013 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces EDITORS Heiner Hänggi & Albrecht Schnabel PRODUCTION Yury Korobovsky COPY EDITOR Cherry Ekins COVER IMAGES © ‘Gendarmerie Line’ by Mike Baker, ‘French Gendarmerie being trained by Belgian Soldiers in IEDs in Afghanistan’ by unidentified government source, ‘Guardia Civil’ by Joaquim Pol, ‘Carabinieri’ by hhchalle The views expressed are those of the author(s) alone and do not in any way reflect the views of the institutions referred to or represented within this paper. -
The Career of Maurice Papon from Vichy France to the Algerian War
Duty, Death and the Republic: The Career of Maurice Papon from Vichy France to the Algerian War Stephanie Hare London School of Economics and Political Science June 2008 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in International History, Department of International History, LSE. 1 UMI Number: U613400 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U613400 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Library of Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. -
The Loi Defferre: Decentralizing France Without Democratizing It Joseph Jerome
The loi Defferre: Decentralizing France Without Democratizing It Joseph Jerome As France developed in the postwar period, political elites began to see the highly centralized nature of the French state as an obstacle for good governance and, simultaneously, as an impediment to the democratic national interest. In 1981, the Socialist Party under President Mitterrand came to power under a platform proposing to decentralize authority from the center to the subnational governments. The decentralization law, titled the Law on Rights and Liberties for Communes, Departments, and Regions proposed to redefine the power relationship between local politicians and the state administrative apparatus. Under the aegis of Gaston Defferre, Minister of the Interior and Decentralization, the Socialists envisioned decentralization as a mechanism to invigorate the French citizenry and, in the words of President Mitterrand, “give the state back to the people.”1 However, while the loi Defferre as it came to be called would in fact empower local government vis-à-vis the state, entrenched political interests would ultimately keep decentralization from achieving its democratizing potential. I. Organization of the French State Traditionally, France has been conceived as a highly centralized state with strong, predominant central institutions. Tocqueville considered that France, under the ancien regime, had achieved “the greatest possible degree of centralisation of government that can be conceived.”2 Though the unitary figure of the monarchy vanished with the Revolution, the central government assumed a “legal omnipotence” that soon came to define the indivisible French Republic.3 The forces of the Revolution repurposed the monarchy's centralizing ideology in order to pursue “the idea that the French people are a natural entity to which one's first loyalty 1 MICHAEL KEATING & PAUL HAINSWORTH, DECENTRALISATION AND CHANGE IN CONTEMPORARY FRANCE 15 (Gower 1986). -
Maintaining Law and Order
MAINTAINING LAW AND ORDER: AT WHAT COST? SUMMARY OF THE REPORT ON DEVELOPMENTS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICES IN FRANCE AND THEIR IMPACT ON PERSONAL FREEDOMS SUMMARY OF THE REPORT - MAINTAINING LAW AND ORDER: AT WHAT COST? 3 A YEAR-LONG INVESTIGATION For several years, ACAT (Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture) has been looking at the use of force by the French police and gendarmes and at the access to justice for victims of unlawful violence. In a first report published in 2016, ACAT was already examining the subject of law enforcement operations. Observing that changing practices sparked discussions, ACAT continued its inquiry by producing various analysis reports. The handling of the Gilets jaunes1 (yellow vest) demonstrations and the numerous debates about the use of force deployed during the protests reinforced the organisation’s initial analyses. ACAT then launched an important investigation aimed at questioning the role and choices of law enforcement authorities since the early 2000s. From November 2018 to January 2020, ACAT carried out a careful analysis of the available documentation on the subject in order to update and deepen its previous analyses. As part of this investigation, ACAT has always sought to expand its sources of information. Numerous documents have thus been studied and used, such as institutional and parliamentary reports; papers written by organisations; sociological and medical studies; court decisions; and newspaper articles. ACAT has also met with a very wide range of individuals concerned with law enforcement issues: victims, lawyers, law enforcement officers and authorities, researchers, and representatives of the Défenseur des droits (Defender of Rights). -
Policing Paris : 'Out Of' Or 'Still In' Napoleonic Time? Introduction On
Policing Paris : 'Out of' or 'still in' Napoleonic Time? Christian Mouhanna1 & Marleen Easton2 Abstract: No scholar, policy-maker or practitioner of policing could be taken seriously who did not acknowledge and take into account the radical transformation which privatization and pluralisation has brought to the field of policing (Jones & Newburn, 2006). Nevertheless, this transformation is largely influenced by the nature of the policing tradition in each nation state. To illustrate this argument a descriptive analysis of plural policing in the metropolis Paris is presented. Being part of the Napoleonic policing tradition in France, Paris takes up a unique political and administrative position which affects its security architecture. It stands out as the most developed example of centralisation and the State’s wish to control its citizens. Despite the observed pluralisation in terms of privatization; Paris is still a ‘state’ in the state. Its Napoleonic tradition largely ‘suppresses’ civil non-commercial initiatives and influences the development of municipal police forces and other public uniformed surveillance agencies in Paris. Introduction on Plural Policing in Paris Within this special issue on the local reality of policing in European metropoles, Paris cannot be overlooked. Its policing tradition, relying on a high level of State centralization, strongly influences the answer to the central question of this special issue: “To what extent is a local police still present in European metropoles and how is this reality linked with other actors in the security field”? Answering this question implies that we do not concentrate solely on the ‘police apparatus’ but that we need to address a broad ‘policing’ concept which includes formal forms of social control such as other public uniformed surveillance agencies, private commercial security agencies and civil non-commercial initiatives. -
The Dichotomy of Universalism and Particularism in French Guiana Fred Réno, Bernard Phipps
The dichotomy of Universalism and Particularism in French Guiana Fred Réno, Bernard Phipps To cite this version: Fred Réno, Bernard Phipps. The dichotomy of Universalism and Particularism in French Guiana. Post colonial Trajectories in the Caribbean : the three Guianas, 2017. hal-02570348 HAL Id: hal-02570348 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02570348 Submitted on 12 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The dichotomy of Universalism and Particularism in French Guiana Fred Réno and Bernard Phipps Post-Colonial Trajectories in the Caribbean The Three Guianas Edited by Rosemarijn Hoefte, Matthew L. Bishop, Peter Clegg © 2017 – Routledge December 2015 was a landmark in the political history of French Guiana with the election of the new single territorial community – the collectivité unique - which enshrined the official demise of the Région and, more pertinently, the Département that had previously embodied the principle of assimilation of this South American French territory to France. Broadly-speaking, the traditional two-tier system – which exists all over metropolitan France, although, in contrast to those overseas, mainland Regions comprise multiple Departments – has been slimmed down and streamlined into a single political body combining the powers of the former two. -
American Friends Service Committee Archives at Philadelphia
American Friends Service Committee Records Relating to Humanitarian Work in France, 1933-1950. CONTAINER LIST __________________________ American Friends Service Committee 1501 Cherry Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 1 American Friends Service Committee Records Relating to Humanitarian Work in France, 1933-1950. Organization of the Collection No Series Box # 1. Perpignan Office 1-20 2. Toulouse Office 21-33 3. Vichy France 34-42 4. Commissionerřs Office 43-48 5. Bordeaux Office 49 6. Caen Office 50 7. Le Havre Office 51 8. Marseille Office 52-62 9. Montauban Office 63-71 10. Paris Office 72-84 __________________________ American Friends Service Committee 1501 Cherry Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 2 American Friends Service Committee Records Relating to Humanitarian Work in France, 1933-1950. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Extent: 84 boxes (35 linear feet) Organization and arrangement: Organized in the following series: 1.Perpignan Office (Box 1-20); 2. Toulouse Office (Box 21-33); 3. Vichy France (Box 34-42); 4. Commissionerřs Office (Box 43-48); 5. Bordeaux Office (Box 49); 6. Caen Office (Box 50); 7. Le Havre Office (Box 51); 8. Marseille Office (Box 52-62); 9. Montauban Office (Box 63-71); 10. Paris Office (Box 72-84). Arrangement is chronological. Summary: The collection pertains to the activities of the American, British, and French Quakers in France and North Africa from 1933-1950. The collection encompasses the Paris-based office of the Commissioner for Europe, the AFSCřs liaison with the Allied occupation governments in Germany, Austria and North Africa as of 1943, and the Quaker delegations in Paris, Bordeaux, Caen, Le Havre, Lyon, Marseille, Montauban, Perpignan, and Toulouse, which cover the years 1933-1950. -
The Territorial Organisation of France
The territorial organisation of France Published on France’s National Assembly’s website Available in French at this link Translated with DeepL Pro Since the 2003 revision, the Constitution has affirmed that the organization of the Republic is decentralized, thus taking note of the decentralization process initiated in the early 1980s. In fact, many powers have been transferred to the communes, departments and regions, but also to special-status communities and overseas collectivities. At the same time, communes are increasingly grouping together within public establishments for intermunicipal cooperation, in order to pool their resources. As a reflection of their competences, these are also increasing sharply, both in terms of financial and human resources. This twofold increase in competences and resources makes local authorities major public players in local life and democracy. The constitutional amendment of 28 March 2003 enshrined in Article 1 of the Constitution the fact that the organisation of the Republic is decentralised. This new stage in the decentralization process is part of the continuation of numerous reforms, which have conferred greater freedom of administration on the various territorial levels. The Act of 2 March 1982 on the rights and freedoms of communes, departments and regions marked an essential step in this regard. Since the 1990s, emphasis has been placed on intermunicipal cooperation. This process of decentralization has also been accompanied by an increasing devolution of State services to the regions and departments. Starting in 2009 and 2010, the deconcentrated services have undergone a profound reorganisation as part of an overall reform of the territorial administration of the State. -
The Monument Aux Morts in Republican Strasbourg
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Carving Out an Identity: The Monument aux Morts in Republican Strasbourg THESIS submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History by Andrew Christian Richter Thesis Committee: Associate Professor Sarah Farmer, Chair Associate Professor Ian Coller Professor Susan Morrissey 2019 © 2019 Andrew Christian Richter TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS vi INTRODUCTION 1 LET US PAY OUR DEBT 3 ALSACE’S PLACE IN THE NATION 6 RITUAL AS THE NEXUS OF NATION-BUILDING 8 THE MONUMENT AUX MORTS 10 THE MEN AND MATERIALS OF THE MONUMENT 13 THE RITUAL PERFORMANCE OF REPUBLICANISM 20 CONTEMPORARY RESPONSES 23 ALSATIAN SYMPATTHIES 31 CONCLUSION/EPILOGUE 34 REFERENCES 36 iii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 Le Départ des poilus, août 1914 , Gare de l’Est, Paris 2 Figure 2 Appeal to the population for donations toward the monument 4 Figure 3 Monument aux morts , Place de la République. Strasbourg 11 Figure 4 Map showing location of Strasbourg, Euville, and the Vosges 17 Figure 5 City Map of Strasbourg 17 Figure 6 Kaiserplatz before 1918 18 Figure 7 Inauguration of the monument aux morts de Strasbourg 21 Figure 8 Le Petit Parisien front page, October 19, 1936 26 Figure 9 L’Humanité front page, October 19, 1936 28 Figure 10 1936 Election Results 33 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express the deepest appreciation to the members of my committee for their guidance in the past two years. Additionally, I thank the other faculty members in the History Department who I have worked with during my time here.