Part Two Water Supply to Gaza Strip

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Part Two Water Supply to Gaza Strip 1 © Palestinian Water Authority West Bank Al-Baloua, Baghdad St. P.O. Box 2174. Al-Bireh Tel: +972 2 242 90 22 Fax: +972 2 242 93 41 Gaza Al-Rimal, Al-wehdeh St. P.O. Box 1438. Al-Rimal Tel: +972 8 283 36 09 Fax: +972 8 282 66 30 www.pwa.ps 2 Table of Contents Foreword . 6 Introduction . .8 1.1 Contextual Background and Current Situation. .9 1.2 Palestinian Water Authority’s Role in Water Supply . .11 1.3 Report Aim, Structure and Content . .10 1.4 Executive Summary. 12 Part One Water Supply to the West Bank . 15 1.1 Water Resources . .15 1.1.1 Local Resources. 19 I. Municipal Wells . .23 II. Ein Samia (JWU) wells. 24 III. PWA Wells. 26 IV. Agricultural Wells . .27 V. Springs. 28 1.1.2 Purchased Resources. 31 1.2 Water Production vs. Water Consumption. 33 1.2.1 Average Water Supply Rate . .33 1.2.2 Supply and Demand Gap . .35 1.2.3 Water Consumption Rate- Individual Analysis. 38 1.2.4 Water Network Coverage . .44 1.2.5 Water Supply for Agricultural Purposes. 52 Part Two Water Supply to Gaza Strip. 55 2.1 Municipal Water Demand. 56 2.1.1Governorate Analysis . .59 I. Northern Governorate . .59 II. Gaza Governorate. .60 III. Middle governorate . .60 IV. Khan Younis Governorate. 61 V. Rafah Governorate. 62 2.1.2UNRWA Wells. 63 3 2.1.3Purchased Resources . .64 2.2.1 Crop Water Requirements and Vulnerable Climate Change in the Region 69 2.2.2Livestock Water Demand. .71 2.2.3 General Notes. 72 Part Three Consequences of Israeli Actions. 75 3.1 Water Supply to Area C. 75 3.2 Violations in Water Supply Agreements . .76 Annexes . 79 4 Foreword 5 Foreword It is apparent to all water related data and information professionals including from identified sources, and scientists, managers, planners, to assure and control the data and decision makers that the flow from the field to the water availability of information and information system and then to data on the water situation is the different users through its the key stone for water sector dissemination. The data bank development as well as a key unit then stores and controls the element for the Integrated data of assured quality to present Water Resources Management and list data in a suitable format. and planning in any country. The With predefined quality control mechanism of disseminating the measures, and according to its water information in the current defined mandate in different situation is not considered a reports and publications. flexible process for the different This report is one of the reports key actors for strategic planning presented recently by PWA to and effective management highlight its activities within the of the most important sector water sector, and to illustrate where all issues intersect: the water resources supply and social, economic, hydrological, demand gaps in the Occupied metrological, water use, and Palestinian Territory aiming to water consumption. Therefore, provide the interested users- PWA realizes the important readers a factual scene of the need for publishing and status of water development disseminating water sector practices and the actual data and information for the supplied quantities to the public in a continuous and Palestinian communities in sustainable manner. to achieve the West Bank and the Gaza this objective. PWA established Strip. This report includes the Data Bank unit with the a different set of indicators following main objectives: showing the acute water crisis to gather and collect water in the availability of water for 6 Water Supply Report Palestinian communities due led to publishing this report, to the domination and control especially the Data Bank staff, over water resources by the Ashraf Dweikat, Shahd Tibi, and Israeli occupation authorities the water resources staff, Deeb and the imposed mechanisms Abdelghafour, Omar Zayed, and that lead to a halt in the the advisors, Almotaz Abadi development process of the and Dr. Karen Assaf, and from water infrastructure needed PWA Gaza, Ahmed Yaqoubi, for a fair distribution across the Mahmoud Abdullatif, Jamal fragmented territories. Dadah, for their efforts as a Team to set up a solid process to issue This report is also considered such report. as a reference document to abstract figures and facts on Lastly, I would like to express my the status of Palestinian water gratitude to the UNICEF team in the oPt that offered its financial supply and demand and it and technical support to enable shows the difference in water PWA to set up a sustainable consumption rates within mechanism to disseminate the Palestinian governorates. data and information on water I would like to express my and wastewater sector. PWA deepest gratitude to the will in the future issue periodic Palestinian Water Authority team reports on water supply based for their tremendous efforts that on the format of this report. Dr. Shaddad Attili Head of the Palestinian Water Authority 7 Introduction Ongoing Palestinian Institutional Scheme for the Water Sector is 1.1 Contextual Background divided to the Main Pillars: and Current Situation Policy, Planning, Development The water sector in the and Regulation, This is undertaken by PWA and the Occupied Palestinian Territory Joint Water Committee along with the is currently going through a relevant line ministries (Ministry of Agriculture …) crucial period; the existing situation is set in the context Water Supply, This is obtained from local resources of unbalanced opportunities. (PWA wells, municipal wells, Jerusalem Since 1967, Palestinians have Water Undertaking (JWU) wells, lost their share from and Agricultural wells and springs) or purchased from the Israeli water access to the Jordan River company “Mekorot”. which is the most important Water Distribution, surface water resource in the This process is carried out by water region, in addition to most service providers such as JWU, Water Supply and Sewerage Authority of the groundwater that is (WSSA), Municipalities, Village Council considered as the main source Water departments, and Joint Service of water supplied annually Councils. with insufficient quantities Water Consumption, that is less than half of the Water is needed mainly for domestic or agricultural uses with minimal industrial basic needs. needs at this time. The full control of the Israelis Water is mainly delivered through water networks; if that is not the case; over water resources and the household depends on purchasing infrastructure development water from tankers with an average cost of 12 NIS/m3, moreover, this price can has resulted in obvious reach even double this value depending poor capacity building for on the distance the tanker has to cross, the flexibility of the checkpoint and practitioners working in this sometimes the interference of black- field, as well as poor economic market principles. Residents also depend on the use of rainfall collection growth accompanied with wells with an average cost of 6 NIS/ increased poverty. Health m3, or depend on spring water with and sanitation conditions are an average cost of 3.5 NIS/m3, or water from other sources that may cost them getting worse, in addition as high as 13 NIS/m3 or even more. 8 to a massive deterioration of 1.2 Palestinian Water the environment(1). This lack Authority’s Role in Water of access to adequate, safe, Supply and sufficient drinking water “Israel is confiscating our land is a critical problem for the and our water and obstructing Palestinian population, who our movement as well as the are forced to decrease their movement of goods. It is the standard of living to the bare one obstructing our whole minimum, depriving them from destiny, all of this is unilateral.”(2) the basic human rights to water, Within the context of the food security and health. National Water Policy (NWP) and A living proof for this dilemma the draft Water Management is the Palestinians’ actual water Strategy (WMS); the overall consumption rate (82 l/c/d) that objective and guiding vision of lies below the minimum World the Palestinian Water Authority Health Organization’s (WHO)’s (PWA) is the equitable and standards (100 l/c/d), compared sustainable management and to about four times as much in development of Palestine’s water Israel (300 l/c/d). resources. This corresponds with PWA’s mission of securing It is worth mentioning that a transparent, sustainable and in rural communities which accountable environmentally are not connected to a sound development of water water distribution network, resources through efficient Palestinians survive on far less regulations and equitable water that 70 l/c/d, and in some cases management. The goals set barely 15 liters per day. to achieve that mainly define the optimum way to regulate, manage, protect and conserve the limited water resources as (1) For further information about the current water (2) Statement by H.E. Mr. Mahmoud Abbas, sector in Palestine refer to the PWA study: “Basic President of the State of Palestine, before United Needs and Development Ongoing and Proposed Nations General Assembly-Sixty-sixth Session. Projects by Governorates”, 2009. New York, 2011. 9 well as optimize the benefit from water resources development by Summary: PWA Role in raising water consumption levels Water Supply Process to provide a healthy environment • Support centralization and economic development. of the hydrological data Addressing the increasing collection and publishing of all water resources data scarcity of water resources and information. in Palestine and the political complexity attached to it with • Evaluate projects related proper key solutions is simply to water resources the translation of the PWA’s prior to licensing its implementation. goals in this area. One of the policy’s main principles is that • Participate in the water supply must be based on preparation of regional a sustainable development of water plans, supervise and all available water resources, of monitor individual water which the development of these projects as well as the preparation of a national resources must be coordinated water plan.
Recommended publications
  • University of Cincinnati
    U UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 05-20-2009 I, Shadi Y. Saleh , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master in Architecture It is entitled: Designing by Community Participation: Meeting the Challenges of the Palestinian Refugee Camps Shadi Saleh Student Signature: This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Elizabeth Riorden Thomas Bible Approval of the electronic document: I have reviewed the Thesis/Dissertation in its final electronic format and certify that it is an accurate copy of the document reviewed and approved by the committee. Committee Chair signature: Elizabeth Riorden Designing by Community Participation: Meeting the Challenges of the Palestinian Refugee Camps A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advance Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Architecture In the school of Architecture and Interior design Of the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning 2009 By Shadi Y. Saleh Committee chair Elizabeth Riorden Thomas Bible ABSTRACT Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria are the result of the sudden population displacements of 1948 and 1967. After 60 years, unorganized urban growth compounds the situation. The absence of state support pushed the refugees to take matters into their own hands. Currently the camps have problems stemming from both the social situation and the degradation of the built environment. Keeping the refugee camps in order to “represent” a nation in exile does not mean to me that there should be no development. The thesis seeks to make a contribution in solving the social and environmental problems in a way that emphasizes the Right of Return.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning Analyses of Refugee Camps, Jabalia As Case Study-Gaza Strip, Palestine
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391 Urban Planning Analyses of Refugee Camps, Jabalia as Case Study-Gaza Strip, Palestine Dr. Usama Ibrahim Badawy1, Dr Ra’ed A. Salha2, Dr. Muain Qasem Jawabrah3, Amjad Jarada4 Mohammed A. EL Hawajri5 1Former Professor of Architecture, Birzeit University Palestine, works currently at UNRWA 2Assistant Professor, Islamic University of Gaza in Geography and GIS Palestine 3Assistance Professor, Architecture Department, Birzeit University Palestine 4Researcher in Infrastructure Planning and Development works currently at UNRWA, G, 5Researcher Geography subjects, works currently as teacher by the Ministry of Education Abstract: The Gaza Strip is a tight area with more than 1.8 million inhabitants. Since the beginning of the last century, and as other Palestinian areas, Gaza Strip was subject to direct occupation. The occupation tightened laws and regulations and increased obstacles, meanwhile it established settlements in a method that besieges existing Palestinian urban areas and leads them to develop in a way that serves the occupation, particularly the security side. This research begins with background information on Palestinian refugees in Gaza, sees that camp Improvement Strategies should called for adoption of the future urban planning, increasing the accommodation capacity of the built-up area, activating the environmental resources protection laws and played down the issue of the land properties when preparing the comprehensive plans. In this study reviews options for addressing the problems faced by Palestinian refugees in Gaza, Recommendations: After discussing the topic through a analyses of the Current Conditions , Land availability, Population distribution, Land requirements, Overcrowding, Public Spaces problems inside the camps , Sustainability in Gaza Strip, socio-economic situation , Unemployment problem and Population density in Jabalia Camp.
    [Show full text]
  • North Gaza ¥ August 2011 ¥ 3 3 Mediterranean Sea No-Go Zone
    No Fishing Zone 1.5 nautical miles 3 nautical miles X Y Z AA BB CC DD EE FF X Y Z AA BB CC DD EE FF Yad Mordekhai Yad Mordekhai 2 United Nations OfficeAs-Siafa for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs As-Siafa 2 ACCESS AND MOVEMENT - NORTH GAZA ¥ auGUST 2011 ¥ 3 3 Mediterranean Sea No-Go Zone Al-Rasheed Netiv ha-Asara Netiv ha-Asara High Risk Zone Temporary Wastewater 4 Treatment Lagoons 4 Erez Crossing Erez Crossing Al Qaraya al Badawiya (Beit Hanoun) (Beit Hanoun) Al Qaraya al Badawiya (Umm An-Naser) (Umm An-Naser) Beit Lahia 5 Wastewater 5 Treatment Plant Beit Lahiya Beit Lahiya 6 6 'Izbat Beit Hanoun 'Izbat Beit Hanoun Al Mathaf Hotel Al-Sekka Al Karama Al Karama El-Bahar Beit Lahia Main St. Arc-Med Hotel Al-Faloja Sheikh Zayed Beit Hanoun Housing Project Beit Hanoun Madinat al 'Awda 7 v®Madinat al 'Awda 7 Beit Hanoun Jabalia Camp v® Industrial Jabalia Camp 'Arab Maslakh Zone Beit Hanoun 'Arab Maslakh Kamal Edwan Beit Lahya Beit Lahya Abu Ali Eyad Kamal Edwan Hospital Al-Naser Al-Saftawi Hospital Khalil Al-Wazeer Ahmad Sadeq Ash Shati' Camp Said El-Asi Jabalia Jabalia An Naser 8 Al-quds An Naser 8 El-Majadla Ash Sheikh Yousef El-Adama Ash Sheikh Al-Sekka Radwan Radwan Falastin Khalil El-Wazeer Al Deira Hotel Ameen El Husaini Heteen Salah El-Deen ! Al-Yarmook Saleh Dardona Abu Baker Al-Razy Palestine Stadium Al-Shifa Al-Jalaa 9 9 Hospital ! Al-quds Northern Rimal Al-Naffaq Al-Mashahra El-Karama Northern Rimal Omar El-Mokhtar Southern Rimal Al-Wehda Al-Shohada Al Azhar University Ad Daraj G Ad Daraj o v At Tuffah e At Tuffah 10 r 10 n High Risk Zone Islamic ! or Al-Qanal a University Yafa t e Haifa Jamal Abdel Naser Al-Sekka 500 meter NO-Go Zone Salah El-Deen Gaza Strip Beit Lahiya Al-Qahera Khalil Al-Wazeer J" Boundar J" y JabalyaJ" Al-Aqsa As Sabra Gaza City Beit Hanun Gaza City Marzouq GazaJ" City Northern Gaza Al-Dahshan Wire Fence Al 'Umari11 Wastewater 11 Mosque Moshtaha Treatment Plant Tal El Hawa Ijdeedeh Ijdeedeh Deir alJ" Balah Old City Bagdad Old City Rd No.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza CRISIS)P H C S Ti P P I U
    United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs occupied Palestinian territory Zikim e Karmiya s n e o il Z P m A g l in a AGCCESSA ANDZ AMOV EMENTSTRI (GAZA CRISIS)P h c s ti P P i u F a ¥ SEPTEMBER 2014 o nA P N .5 F 1 Yad Mordekhai EREZ CROSSING (BEIT HANOUN) occupied Palestinian territory: ID a As-Siafa OPEN, six days (daytime) a B?week4 for B?3the4 movement d Governorates e e of international workers and limited number of y h s a b R authorized Palestinians including aid workers, medical, P r 2 e A humanitarian cases, businessmen and aid workers. Jenin d 1 e 0 Netiv ha-Asara P c 2 P Tubas r Tulkarm r fo e S P Al Attarta Temporary Wastewater P n b Treatment Lagoons Qalqiliya Nablus Erez Crossing E Ghaboon m Hai Al Amal r Fado's 4 e B? (Beit Hanoun) Salfit t e P P v i Al Qaraya al Badawiya i v P! W e s t R n m (Umm An-Naser) n i o » B a n k a North Gaza º Al Jam'ia ¹¹ M E D I TER RAN EAN Hatabiyya Ramallah da Jericho d L N n r n r KJ S E A ee o Beit Lahia D P o o J g Wastewater Ed t Al Salateen Beit Lahiya h 5 Al Kur'a J a 9 P l D n Treatment Plant D D D D 9 ) D s As Sultan D 1 2 El Khamsa D " Sa D e J D D l i D 0 D s i D D 0 D D d D D m 2 9 Abedl Hamaid D D r D D l D D o s D D a t D D c Jerusalem D D c n P a D D c h D D i t D D s e P! D D A u P 0 D D D e D D D a l m d D D o i t D D l i " D D n .
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Report on Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (10 – 16 November 2016) | Palestinian Center for Human Rights
    11/17/2016 Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (10 – 16 November 2016) | Palestinian Center for Human Rights Weekly Report On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (10 – 16 November 2016) Israeli forces continue systematic crimes in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) (10 – 16 November 2016) Israeli forces continued to use excessive force in the oPt 6 Palestinian civilians, including 2 children, were wounded in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. House demolitions on grounds of collective punishment. A room was closed with concrete in Yatta, south of Hebron. Israeli forces conducted 64 incursions into Palestinian communities in the West Bank and 6 ones in occupied Jerusalem. 57 civilians, including 15 children and a woman, were arrested. Fifteen of them, including 12 children and the woman, were arrested in occupied Jerusalem. The Health Improvement Program’s office in Ramallah was raided and some of its content were confiscated. Israeli forces continued to target Palestinian fishermen in the Gaza Strip Sea. 2 fishermen were arrested and their fishing boat was confiscated, north of the Gaza Strip. Israeli forces continued their efforts to create Jewish majority in occupied East Jerusalem. 2 residential apartments in al­Mukaber Mount and 2 stores in Beit Hanina were self­demolished by their owners. 2 barracks, an agricultural room and a mosque foundation in Silwan and Sour Baher villages were demolished. Settlement activities continued in the West Bank. 2 agricultural rooms in Qalqilya and a residential tent, a social service centre and a well, south of Hebron, were demolished.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides and Agroecology in the Occupied West Bank Conclusions from a Joint APN-PANAP Mission in Palestine, May 2016
    Pesticides and Agroecology in the Occupied West Bank Conclusions from a Joint APN-PANAP Mission in Palestine, May 2016 Dr Meriel Watts, Tanya Lee, Heather Aidy PAN Asia Pacific and Arab Group for the Protection of Nature June 2016 Pesticides and Agroecology in the Occupied West Bank Conclusions from a Joint APN-PANAP Mission in Palestine, May 2016 Dr Meriel Watts, Tanya Lee, Heather Aidy PAN Asia Pacific and Arab Group for the Protection of Nature June 2016 Photos: Meriel Watts unless otherwise specified 4 5 Overview In May 2016, representatives from Arab Group for the Protection of Nature (APN) and PAN Asia Pacific (PANAP) undertook a visit to the Occupied West Bank in Palestine that was facilitated by the Palestinian Farmers Union and Palestinian Voluntary Work Committee. One of the main purposes of this visit was to assess the human rights and environmental implications of the manufacture and illicit trade in pesticides into the Occupied West Bank from inside the Green Line (refer to the next section for an explanation of this terminology). Much of the material in this report was obtained from site visits and discussions with government officials especially the Environmental Quality Authority, union leaders, workers, farmers, pastoralists, medical personnel, educators and students in Hebron, Qalqilya, Salfit, Tubas, Jericho and Tulkarem Governorates. Palestinian pastoralists beside an encroaching illegal Israeli agricultural settlement, Northern Jordan Valley, Tubas Agriculture forms a critical part of the Palestinian economy and society for a variety of reasons, including employment, food security, and prevention of encroachment by illegal Israeli settlements.1 However, farming is significantly hindered by the imposition of the military occupation of Palestine by Israel and the activities of illegal Israeli settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning Analyses of Refugee Camps, Jabalia As Case Study-Gaza Strip, Palestine
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391 Urban Planning Analyses of Refugee Camps, Jabalia as Case Study-Gaza Strip, Palestine Dr. Usama Ibrahim Badawy1, Dr Ra’ed A. Salha2, Dr. Muain Qasem Jawabrah3, Amjad Jarada4 Mohammed A. EL Hawajri5 1Former Professor of Architecture, Birzeit University Palestine, works currently at UNRWA 2Assistant Professor, Islamic University of Gaza in Geography and GIS Palestine 3Assistance Professor, Architecture Department, Birzeit University Palestine 4Researcher in Infrastructure Planning and Development works currently at UNRWA, G, 5Researcher Geography subjects, works currently as teacher by the Ministry of Education Abstract: The Gaza Strip is a tight area with more than 1.8 million inhabitants. Since the beginning of the last century, and as other Palestinian areas, Gaza Strip was subject to direct occupation. The occupation tightened laws and regulations and increased obstacles, meanwhile it established settlements in a method that besieges existing Palestinian urban areas and leads them to develop in a way that serves the occupation, particularly the security side. This research begins with background information on Palestinian refugees in Gaza, sees that camp Improvement Strategies should called for adoption of the future urban planning, increasing the accommodation capacity of the built-up area, activating the environmental resources protection laws and played down the issue of the land properties when preparing the comprehensive plans. In this study reviews options for addressing the problems faced by Palestinian refugees in Gaza, Recommendations: After discussing the topic through a analyses of the Current Conditions , Land availability, Population distribution, Land requirements, Overcrowding, Public Spaces problems inside the camps , Sustainability in Gaza Strip, socio-economic situation , Unemployment problem and Population density in Jabalia Camp.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Ic
    UNITED NATIONS Security Council Distr. Ic GENERAL s/14930 26 March 1982 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH LETTER DATED 25 MARCH 1982 FROM THE PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF JORDAN TO THE UNITED NATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL I have the honour to forward to you the enclosed letter, at the request of Mr. zuhdi Labib Terzi, the Permanent Cbserver of the Palestine Liberation Organization, concerning further acts of brutality against the Mayor of Nablus, Mr. Bassam Shakaa and the Mayor of Ramallah, Mr. Kaeim Khalef, who were arrested and removed from their legally elected offices. Inasmuch as these acts of terror and brutality continue to pervade the occupied Palestinian territory, I would deeply appreciate it if my letter and the enclosed letter from the Permanent Observer of the Palestine Liberation Organization could be circulated as a document of the Security Council. (Signed) Hazem NUSEIBEH Ambassador Permanent Representative 82-07682 0300~ (E) / ,.. s/14930 hglish Annex Page 1 ---Annex Ix'cter dated 25 March 1982 from the Permanent Observer of the' Palestine Liberation Organization to the Uhited Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council I am requested by Chairman Yasser Arafat to bring the following to your most urgent attention. ?bday Mayor Bassam Shakaa of Nablus and Mayor Karim Khalef of Ramallah were arrested and removed from their legally elected offices. Israeli troops then installed so-called civilian administrators in their place. Speculation is 'chat the arrests of Shakaa and Khalef precede their forceable deportation and exile from Palestine. Members of the Nablus municipality and a number of Shakaa's supporters were summoned to General Menahem Milson's office and threatened with severe repercussions should they allow the situation in Nablus to deteriorate.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza Strip 2020 As-Siafa Mapping Movement and Access Netiv Ha'asara Temporary
    Zikim Karmiya No Fishing Zone 1.5 nautical miles Yad Mordekhai January Gaza Strip 2020 As-Siafa Mapping Movement and Access Netiv Ha'asara Temporary Ar-Rasheed Wastewater Treatment Lagoons Sources: OCHA, Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics of Statistics Bureau Central OCHA, Palestinian Sources: Erez Crossing 1 Al-Qarya Beit Hanoun Al-Badawiya (Umm An-Naser) Erez What is known today as the Gaza Strip, originally a region in Mandatory Palestine, was created Width 5.7-12.5 km / 3.5 – 7.7 mi through the armistice agreements between Israel and Egypt in 1949. From that time until 1967, North Gaza Length ~40 km / 24.8 mi Al- Karama As-Sekka the Strip was under Egyptian control, cut off from Israel as well as the West Bank, which was Izbat Beit Hanoun al-Jaker Road Area 365 km2 / 141 m2 Beit Hanoun under Jordanian rule. In 1967, the connection was renewed when both the West Bank and the Gaza Madinat Beit Lahia Al-'Awda Strip were occupied by Israel. The 1993 Oslo Accords define Gaza and the West Bank as a single Sheikh Zayed Beit Hanoun Population 1,943,398 • 48% Under age 17 July 2019 Industrial Zone Ash-Shati Housing Project Jabalia Sderot territorial unit within which freedom of movement would be permitted. However, starting in the camp al-Wazeer Unemployment rate 47% 2019 Q2 Jabalia Camp Khalil early 90s, Israel began a gradual process of closing off the Strip; since 2007, it has enforced a full Ash-Sheikh closure, forbidding exit and entry except in rare cases. Israel continues to control many aspects of Percentage of population receiving aid 80% An-Naser Radwan Salah Ad-Deen 2 life in Gaza, most of its land crossings, its territorial waters and airspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Area a Area B Area C Israeli Settlements the Separation Wall, Implemented the Separation Wall, Under Construction Dead Sea Jorda
    Area A Area B Area C Israeli Settlements The Separation Wall, Implemented The Separation Wall, Under Construction Dead Sea Jordan River Natuar Reserv Area C embodies Palestine: terraced hills with olive groves where shepherds wander with their flocks and Special issue ghazal feed on misty mornings; striking wadis where foxes and mountain goats roam; the dry, rolling desert hills and green oases of al-ghor, the Jordan valley Area C that is less and less accessible to Palestinians; the disappearing Dead Sea where Palestinians no longer feel welcome to swim. Area C comprises sixty-one percent of the West Bank and is crucial for a viable Palestinian State. Connecting Palestine’s cities and villages, 4 Sustainable Urban Development in feeding its citizens, containing a wealth of natural and economic resources, the State of Palestine: An Opportunity housing immeasurable heritage and archeological treasures, it is among the most Interrupted beautiful places in the world - but not under Palestinian control and thus, as of yet, 6 MDGs to SDGs as a viable resource mostly untapped. In Area C, check points and the Separation 10 Area C of the West Bank: Strategic Wall restrict movement and access, which impacts livelihoods and restrains the Importance and Development Prospects entire economy; here the denial of building permits and house demolitions are as much a part of daily life as the uprooting of olive groves and the prevention of 18 International Experts Call for Fundamental Area A farmers from cultivating their fields and orchards. But Area C is also where the Area B Changes in Israel’s Approach to Planning Area C Israeli Settlements creative mind of Palestinians has found ingenious ways of showing resilience and The Segregation Wall, Existing and Development in Area C The Segregation Wall, Under Construction Dead Sea developing strategies for survival and development and in this issue you can read Jordan River 24 National Strategies for Area C Natuar Reserv about some of these.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Consultation on Effects of the COVID-19 on Women in Palestine
    Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics A Summary of Statistical Indicators on Women in Palestine during the Covid19 Crises Most Vulnerable Women Segments Around 10,745 women Health care health system workers and a total of 31,873 workers men and women 900 women working in workers in Palestine Women working in Israel Israel and settlements and settelements mostly in agriculture 175891 total females with chronic Women with Chronic disease 69,112 women suffer from at least one Chronic Disease (60+) Disease The percentage of poverty Female Childen with disease 9,596 female among households headed children with chronic by women in 2017 was 19% in the WB and 54% in Poor women Gaza Strip Elderly women In 2020 there are 140 287 60+ women 92,584 women heading households (61241 WB, Women Heading households 31343 Gaza Strip – 41,017 of highest in Jericho women have Women with disabilities at least one type of disability 1 Social Characteristics 1. The elderly (the most vulnerable group) • The number of elderly people (60+ years) in the middle of 2020 is around 269,346, (5.3% women, 140,287, and 129,059 men) • The percentage of elderly in Palestine was 5.0% of the total population in 2017 (5.4% for the elderly females, 4.6% for the elderly males), and in the West Bank it is higher than in the Gaza Strip (5.4 % In the West Bank and 4.3% in the Gaza Strip). • At the governorate level, the highest percentage of elderly people was in the governorates of Tulkarm, Ramallah, Al-Bireh, Bethlehem, and Jerusalem (6.5%, 6.0%, 6.0%, and 5.9%, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Study Vaw Gaza
    VIOLENCE AGAINST VIOLENCEWOMEN AGAINST IN THE WOMEN GAZA STRIP IN THE GAZA STRIP AFTER THE ISRAELI MILITARY AFTER THE ISRAELI MILITARY OPERATION PROTECTIVE EDGE OPERATION PROTECTIVE EDGE 2014 2014 Prepared by Catherine Müller and Laila Barhoum Commisionned by Alianza por la Solidaridad (ApS) and ActionAid (AA) October, 2015 Acknowledgements 5 Acronyms and abbreviations 6 Executive summary 7 1. Introduction 10 2. Methodology 13 2.1 Qualitative instruments and implementation 13 2.2 Quantitative instrument and implementation 16 2.3 Limitations of the research 17 CONTENTS 3. Background 18 3.1 Existing knowledge on VAW in Gaza 18 3.2 Political violence, conflict and VAWG in Gaza in the past 20 3.3 Operation Protective Edge 22 4. Study Findings 25 4.1 Types and forms of violence commonly experienced by women in public and private spaces 25 4.1.1 Political violence 25 4.1.2 Violence against women 26 4.2 Incidence and prevalence of VAW in public and private spheres 30 4.2.1 Prevalence of violence against women in public and private spaces 30 4.2.2 Prevalence of domestic violence 33 4.2.3 Incidents (frequency) of VAW in public and private spaces 37 4.3 Existing avenues of support 38 4.4 Women and men’s perceptions and acceptance of VAW 43 4.4.1 Causes and triggering factors 43 4.4.1.1 Economic situation 44 4.4.1.2 Gender roles within households 45 4.4.2 Link to acceptance 47 4.4.3 Consequences 49 4.5 The link between military violence and VAW 49 4.6 Better services to protect and support 53 5.
    [Show full text]