DOCSLIB.ORG

Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED LAZY K RANCH PERMITTEE-RESPONSIBLE OFF-SITE MITIGATION PRESERVE PROJECT Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration The following Initial Study has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. Prepared By: University of California Merced 5200 North Lake Road Merced, California 95343 April 2015 Contact: Phillip Woods, Director of Physical & Environmental Planning 5200 North Lake Road Merced, California 95343 (209) 349-2561 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Initial Study ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Public and Agency Review ......................................................................................................................... 1 Organization of the Initial Study ................................................................................................................ 2 1. PROJECT INFORMATION ......................................................................................................................... 3 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Project Need and Objectives ......................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Project Location .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Project Site Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 6 2.5 Project Components ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.6 Project Construction Activities and Schedule .......................................................................... 15 2.7 Construction Control Measures ................................................................................................. 15 3. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS .................................................................................... 18 4. DETERMINATION .................................................................................................................................... 19 5. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS .............................................................................. 20 5.1 Aesthetics ...................................................................................................................................... 21 5.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ......................................................................................... 23 5.3 Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 25 5.4 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................... 31 5.5 Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 43 5.6 Geology and Soils ......................................................................................................................... 46 5.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................................................................... 48 5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................ 52 5.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................................... 55 5.10 Land Use and Planning ............................................................................................................... 58 5.11 Mineral Resources ........................................................................................................................ 60 5.12 Noise .............................................................................................................................................. 61 5.13 Population and Housing ............................................................................................................. 65 5.14 Public Services .............................................................................................................................. 66 5.15 Recreation ...................................................................................................................................... 67 5.16 Transportation and Traffic .......................................................................................................... 68 5.17 Utilities and Service Systems ...................................................................................................... 70 5.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance .......................................................................................... 72 6. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 74 7. REPORT PREPARERS ............................................................................................................................... 75 Appendices A. Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration B. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculations C. Biological Resources Survey Report UC Merced i Lazy K Preserve Initial Study/MND 0974.004 April 2015 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Regional Location ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Project Vicinity .............................................................................................................................................. 8 3 Topographic Map ......................................................................................................................................... 9 4 Preliminary Proposed Pools...................................................................................................................... 12 5 Vernal Pool Restoration Design................................................................................................................ 13 6 Documented Vernal Pool Shrimp Occurrences ...................................................................................... 32 7 Documented Special-Status Amphibians, Plants, and Nesting Raptors ............................................. 33 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 SJVAB Air Quality Attainment Status ..................................................................................................... 25 2 SJVAPCD Air Quality Significance Thresholds ..................................................................................... 26 3 Estimated Construction Emissions (tons per year) ................................................................................ 28 4 Special-Status Species with Potential to Occur in Project Vicinity ...................................................... 34 5 Construction Equipment 50-Foot Noise Emission Limits ..................................................................... 62 UC Merced ii Lazy K Preserve Initial Study/MND 0974.004 April 2015 INTRODUCTION Initial Study The proposed project is the construction and operation of a Permittee-Responsible Off-site Mitigation Preserve by UC Merced on a 65.5-acre site on the Lazy K Ranch in Madera County. The University is proposing to enter into an agreement with the property owner for the establishment of this preserve which would provide compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts from the development of the UC Merced Campus. The proposed agreement with the property owner and the establishment of the preserve is a discretionary action of the University, and is therefore subject to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000 et seq.), an Initial Study is a preliminary environmental analysis that is used by the lead agency (the public agency principally responsible for approving or carrying out the proposed project) as a basis for determining whether an Environmental Impact Report, a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or a Negative Declaration is required for a project. The State CEQA Guidelines require that an Initial Study contain a project description, description of environmental setting, identification of environmental effects by checklist or other similar form, explanation of environmental effects, discussion of mitigation for significant environmental effects, evaluation of the project’s consistency with existing, applicable land use controls, and the name of persons who prepared the study. The purpose of this Initial Study is to evaluate the potential environmental impacts from the construction and operation of the proposed Lazy K Ranch Permittee-Responsible Off-site Mitigation Preserve to determine what level of environmental review is appropriate. As shown
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mammal Species Native to the USA and Canada for Which the MIL Has an Image (296) 31 July 2021
    Mammal species native to the USA and Canada for which the MIL has an image (296) 31 July 2021 ARTIODACTYLA (includes CETACEA) (38) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei - Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 7. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Bos bison - American Bison 2. Oreamnos americanus - Mountain Goat 3. Ovibos moschatus - Muskox 4. Ovis canadensis - Bighorn Sheep 5. Ovis dalli - Thinhorn Sheep CERVIDAE - deer 1. Alces alces - Moose 2. Cervus canadensis - Wapiti (Elk) 3. Odocoileus hemionus - Mule Deer 4. Odocoileus virginianus - White-tailed Deer 5. Rangifer tarandus -Caribou DELPHINIDAE - ocean dolphins 1. Delphinus delphis - Common Dolphin 2. Globicephala macrorhynchus - Short-finned Pilot Whale 3. Grampus griseus - Risso's Dolphin 4. Lagenorhynchus albirostris - White-beaked Dolphin 5. Lissodelphis borealis - Northern Right-whale Dolphin 6. Orcinus orca - Killer Whale 7. Peponocephala electra - Melon-headed Whale 8. Pseudorca crassidens - False Killer Whale 9. Sagmatias obliquidens - Pacific White-sided Dolphin 10. Stenella coeruleoalba - Striped Dolphin 11. Stenella frontalis – Atlantic Spotted Dolphin 12. Steno bredanensis - Rough-toothed Dolphin 13. Tursiops truncatus - Common Bottlenose Dolphin MONODONTIDAE - narwhals, belugas 1. Delphinapterus leucas - Beluga 2. Monodon monoceros - Narwhal PHOCOENIDAE - porpoises 1. Phocoena phocoena - Harbor Porpoise 2. Phocoenoides dalli - Dall’s Porpoise PHYSETERIDAE - sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus – Sperm Whale TAYASSUIDAE - peccaries Dicotyles tajacu - Collared Peccary CARNIVORA (48) CANIDAE - dogs 1. Canis latrans - Coyote 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Species Surveys in the Acquisition Areas on the Tejon Ranch, California
    MAMMALIAN SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE ACQUISITION AREAS ON THE TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR THE TEJON RANCH CONSERVANCY Prepared by: Brian L. Cypher, Christine L. Van Horn Job, Erin N. Tennant, and Scott E. Phillips California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program One University Circle Turlock, CA 95382 August 16, 2010 esrp_2010_TejonRanchsurvey.doc MAMMALIAN SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE ACQUISITION AREAS ON THE TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Study Areas ......................................................................................................................... 3 Methods............................................................................................................................... 4 Target Special Status Species .................................................................................................................... 4 Camera Station Surveys ............................................................................................................................. 4 Live-Trapping ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Spotlight Surveys ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Opportunistic Observations ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Approximately 220 Species of Wild Mammals Occur in California And
    Mammals pproximately 220 species of wild mammals occur in California and the surrounding waters (including introduced species, but not domestic species Asuch as house cats). Amazingly, the state of California has about half of the total number of species that occur on the North American continent (about 440). In part, this diversity reflects the sheer number of different habitats available throughout the state, including alpine, desert, coniferous forest, grassland, oak woodland, and chaparral habitat types, among others (Bakker 1984, Schoenherr 1992, Alden et al. 1998). About 17 mammal species are endemic to California; most of these are kangaroo rats, chipmunks, and squirrels. Nearly 25% of California’s mammal species are either known or suspected to occur at Quail Ridge (Appendix 9). Species found at Quail Ridge are typical of both the Northwestern California and Great Central Valley mammalian faunas. Two California endemics, the Sonoma chipmunk (see Species Accounts for scientific names) and the San Joaquin pocket mouse, are known to occur at Quail Ridge. None of the mammals at Quail Ridge are listed as threatened or endangered by either the state or federal governments, although Townsend’s big-eared bat, which is suspected to occur at Quail Ridge, is a state-listed species of special concern. Many mammal species are nocturnal, fossorial, fly, or are otherwise difficult to observe. However, it is still possible to detect the presence of mammals at Quail Ridge, both visually and by observation of their tracks, scat, and other sign. The mammals most often seen during the day are mule deer and western gray squirrels.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix H-Biological Resources Technical Report
    Draft EIS/EIR Mendota Pool Group 20-Year Exchange Program Appendix H – Biological Resources Technical Report November 2018 Biological Resources Technical Report Proposed 20-Year Extension of the 2005 Mendota Pool Exchange Agreements U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation October 2013 Mid Pacific Region South Central California Area Office Fresno, California Mission Statement The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................ 8 3.1 Regional Aquatic Resources ............................................................................................ 8 3.2 Primary Study Area Vegetation Communities ............................................................... 16 3.3 Mendota Wildlife Area..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TERACOR Resource Management
    APPENDIX B: BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., General Biological Assessment for a 4.75-Acre Property in the City of Palmdale, California, January 14, 2019. [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] GENERAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR A 4.75-ACRE PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO. 3010-030-023 Located within Section 35 of the Ritter Ridge, California Quadrangle within Township 6 north, Range 12 west Prepared for: City of Palmdale, California and Meta Housing Corporation 11150 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite #620 Los Angeles, California 90064 Prepared by: TERACOR Resource Management, Inc. 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 253 Temecula, California 92591 (951) 694-8000 Principal Investigator: Samuel Reed [email protected] Fieldwork conducted by: Samuel Reed and Jared Reed 14 January 2019 General Biological Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Vegetation Communities and Land Covers ........................................................................................... 11 4.0 Wildlife .................................................................................................................................................. 12 5.0 Sensitive Species Analysis ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Weekend, 2017
    Southern California Weekend Venkat Sankar March 31-April 3, 2017 This weekend trip across the coast, mountains, and deserts of S California was designed to take advantage of abnormally high winter rains following on years of “drought” in this part of the state. The trip ran better than expected, netting 26 species and good sightings of almost all target species (my only major dips were Cactus Mouse, Canyon Mouse, and amazingly Round-tailed Ground Squirrel—what I thought was my easiest target!). The only significant surprise was the lower numbers of kangaroo rats and pocket mice at most sites than expected (given the wet winter); perhaps it will be better to search for these in early-mid May. Thank you to Vladimir Dinets for advice on species IDs and Brian Keelan for details on the Stonehouse Mine. (Day 1: 3/31/17) We departed the Bay Area about an hour late and hit commute traffic driving towards the I-5, leaving us too far behind schedule to attempt a detour to Munz Ranch Road near Lake Hughes. After an early dinner, we made our first stop to break the boredom on San Emigdio Canyon Road at about 8:30 PM, which we drove to the gate at the Wind Wolves Preserve entrance. In about 30 minutes, we observed 4 Heermann’s Kangaroo Rats (in the grasslands), 2 almost certain Agile Kangaroo Rats (in a brushy wash with darker tail stripes and larger ears than the former; I have prior experience with this species), and best of all – 3 San Joaquin Pocket Mice (now the best site I know for this species).
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Fall Supplemental Feeding on Giant Kangaroo Rats (Dipodomys Ingens) and Associated Small Mammal Community
    The Influence of Fall Supplemental Feeding on Giant Kangaroo Rats (Dipodomys ingens) and Associated Small Mammal Community Prepared by: William “Tim” Bean Assistant Professor, Department of Wildlife Humboldt State University Final Draft: June 30, 2016 Giant kangaroo rat supplemental feeding experiment Table of Contents Table of Figures ........................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Tables ............................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Results ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Discussion .................................................................................................................................. 14 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................... 16 Literature Cited .......................................................................................................................... 16 ! 2 Giant kangaroo rat supplemental feeding experiment Table of Figures Figure 1. Locations
    [Show full text]
  • SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION and OPEN SPACE PLAN (SJMSCP) November 14, 2000
    SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN (SJMSCP) November 14, 2000 November 14, 2000 THIS PAGE BLANK November 14, 2000 Funding for this document was provided by a grant from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation with assistance from the San Joaquin County Transportation Authority, the City of Tracy, and the City of Lathrop November 14, 2000 THIS PAGE BLANK November 14, 2000 SJMSCP STEERING COMMITTEES, STAFF AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT HABITAT POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Phillip Pennino, Chair City of Lodi Robert Cabral, Vice Chair San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors Ron Addington Business Dan Gifford/Robert Mapes/Dave Zezulak/Terry Roscoe California Department of Fish and Game Mitch Hayden U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waldo Holt Conservation William Lehman/Sheila Larsen/Peter Cross/Robert Pine/Ken Fuller/Mike Horton Cay Goude/Jan Knight/Ann Chrisney/Vicki Campbell/Jim Browning U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Brad Lange Agriculture Bruce Mettler Agriculture Tonie Marie Raymus Business Martha Shaver Land Trusts Steve Stocking Conservation Doug Unruh Business HABITAT STAFF WORKING GROUP Margit Aramburu Delta Protection Commission Luis Arismendi/Don Cose Business Mike Brown Aggregate Mining Ben Cantu Manteca Pam Carder Lathrop John Carlson/Mike Niblock Stockton Dan Gifford/Robert Mapes/Dave Zezulak/ Terry Roscoe California Department of Fish and Game Brian Millar/Barry Hand Tracy Mitch Hayden U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waldo Holt Conservation William Lehman/Sheila Larsen/Peter Cross/Robert Pine/Ken Fuller/Mike Horton/ Cay Goude/Jan Knight/Ann Chrisney/Vicki Campbell/Jim Browning U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Peggy Keranen/Kitty Walker San Joaquin County Rad Bartlam/David Morimoto Lodi Dale Steele, Gina Moran Caltrans Ernest Tyhurst Ripon Julia E.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for San Joaquin Pocket Mouse
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group SAN JOAQUIN POCKET MOUSE Perognathus inornatus Family: HETEROMYIDAE Order: RODENTIA Class: MAMMALIA M087 Written by: T. Harvey, G. Ahlborn Reviewed by: M. White Edited by: G. Ahlborn DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY Occurs in dry, open grasslands or scrub areas on fine-textured soils between 350 and 600 m (1100 and 2000 ft) in the Central and Salinas valleys. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Seeds probably constitute the majority of the diet; also eats green vegetation and insects. Seeds are gathered, carried in cheek pouches, and stored in the burrows. Cover: Hawbecker (1951) found that the San Joaquin pocket mouse occurred on shrubby ridge tops and hillsides. Grinnell (1933) characterized the habitat as being open, sandy areas with grasses and forbs. Digs burrows for cover. Reproduction: Young apparently born and raised in a nest built in the burrow. Water: No data found. Pattern: No additional data found. SPECIES LIFE HISTORY Activity Patterns: Nocturnal. May become torpid during extreme heat or cold. Seasonal Movements/Migration: Non-migratory. Home Range: No data found. Territory: No data found. Reproduction: Reproduction probably occurs during spring and early summer. Niche: P. inornatus is similar in appearance, and probably in habits, to P. Iongimembris. Sympatric in a portion of its range with at least 7 other seed-eating heteromyid rodents: Dipodomys nitratoides, D. heermanni, D. ingens, D. microps, D. panamintinus, P. alticola, and P. Iongimembris. Badgers, owls, weasels, skunks, kit foxes, and domestic cats probably prey on San Joaquin pocket mice. REFERENCES Grinnell, J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to North American Grasslands
    Desert Volume 29, Number 2 Published by The University of Arizona for Plants the Boyce Thompson Arboretum A Guide to North American Grasslands David E. Brown and Elizabeth Makings Relict Great Basin Shrub-Grassland near Wupatki National Monument northeast of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, 1,650 m (5,413 ft). Volume 29, Number 2 Desert Plants Published by The University of Arizona for the Boyce Thompson Arboretum A journal devoted to broadening knowledge of plants 37615 E US Highway 60 indigenous or adapted to arid and sub-arid regions and Superior, AZ 85173 to encouraging the appreciation of these plants. Copyright 2014. The Arizona Board of Regents on Mark D. Siegwarth, editor behalf of The University of Arizona. The Boyce [email protected] Thompson Arboretum at Superior, Arizona, is cooperatively managed by the Boyce Thompson Production Director: Kim Stone Southwestern Arboretum, Inc., The University of Arizona, and Arizona State Parks. Boyce Thompson Arboretum From the editor As Desert Plants begins its 35th year with a new staff, it in editorship comes the opportunity to rethink what Desert seems somewhat appropriate that as we begin a new chap- Plants is and could be. Desert Plants is devoted to broad- ter in the history of Desert Plants, we start with A Guide ening knowledge of plants indigenous or adapted to arid to North American Grasslands by David E. Brown and Eliza- and sub-arid regions and to encouraging the appreciation of beth Makings. Probably one of the most quoted, used and these plants. With such a broad mandate, it is open to vari- reprinted issues of Desert Plants to this day is Volume 4, ous interpretations.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vertebrate Fauna of the San Joaquin
    Vertebrate Fauna of the San Joaquin Experimental Range, California: an annotated checklist based on 70 years of observations 2007 Kathryn L. Purcell Douglas A. Drynan Kevin M. Mazzocco Pacific Southwest Research Station U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Service Vertebrate Fauna of the San Joaquin Experimental Range, California: an annotated checklist based on 70 years of observations (Revised October 2007) Introduction Established in 1934, the San Joaquin Experimental Range (hereafter SJER) was California’s first Experimental Range. Many studies of wildlife species have been carried out at SJER since its inception, and it continues to provide unique opportunities for research and educational activities that create an enhanced understanding of the foothill oak woodland ecosystem of California. In cooperation with individuals and other organizations, the Pacific Southwest Research Station has participated in and encouraged studies of many basic biological subjects. Agencies and institutions that have taken part include the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, University of California, and California State University, Fresno. As a result of these studies and occasional observations, the wildlife species of SJER have been fairly well documented. SJER is located on 1,806 ha (4,462 ac) near the center of California in the lower Sierra Nevada foothills of Madera County. Elevations range from 213 to 518 m (700 to 1,700 ft). Winters are mild and moist; summers are hot and dry. Rainfall averages 46.7 cm (18.4 in) per year, with extremes of less than 25 and more than 76 cm (10 and more than 30 in).
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION PLAN for PROTE SPECIES on NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NO. 1, KERN Corn CALIF
    520- 7a EA’S1 97-2 Resources Program CONSERVATION PLAN FOR PROTE SPECIES ON NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NO. 1, KERN corn CALIF July 1997 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, product, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United State Government or any agency thereof. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P. 0. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U. S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. ii .Enterprise Advisory Services, Inc. EASI 97-2 NPRC Endangered Species and Cultural Resources Program CONSERVATION PLAN FOR PROTECTED SPECIES ON NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE NO. 1, KERN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Mark R. M. Otten and Brian L. Cypher July 1997 Naval Petroleum Reserves in California P.O.
    [Show full text]