Western Burrowing Owl (Athene Cunicularia Hypugaea) As an Endangered Or Threatened Species Under the California Endangered Species Act

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Western Burrowing Owl (Athene Cunicularia Hypugaea) As an Endangered Or Threatened Species Under the California Endangered Species Act PETITION TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR LISTING THE CALIFORNIA POPULATION OF THE WESTERN BURROWING OWL (ATHENE CUNICULARIA HYPUGAEA) AS AN ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT PETITIONERS Center for Biological Diversity Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society Contact: Jeff Miller Contact: Craig Breon (510) 625-0136, [email protected] (408) 252-3748, [email protected] 370 Grand Avenue, Suite 5 22221 McClellan Road Oakland, CA 94610 Cupertino, CA 95014 Defenders of Wildlife San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society Contact: Kim Delfino Contact: Tony Metcalf (916) 313-5809, [email protected] (909) 242-7038, [email protected] 926 J Street, Suite 522 P.O. Box 10973 Sacramento, CA 95814 San Bernardino, CA 92423-0973 California State Park Rangers Association Tri-County Conservation League Contact: Geary Hund Contact: Jack Bath (909) 940-5617, [email protected] (909) 627-9071, [email protected] 17801 Lake Perris Drive P. O. Box 51127 Perris, CA 92571 Riverside, CA 92517 Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife, San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society, California State Park Rangers Association, and Tri-County Conservation League petition the California Fish and Game Commission to list the western burrowing owl as a state endangered or threatened species. Petitioners submit this petition pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act, Fish and Game Code §§ 2070 et seq., on their own behalf and on behalf of their members and staff with an interest in protecting the western burrowing owl and its habitat in California. Lead petitioner Center for Biological Diversity is a nonprofit environmental organization dedicated to the protection of native species and their habitats. The Center works to protect and restore natural ecosystems and imperiled species through science, education, policy, and environmental law. The Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society works to maintain, preserve, and protect native animal and plant habitats and to foster a greater public awareness of our environment, with emphasis on birds and their ecosystems, particularly in Santa Clara County and the San Francisco Bay Area. Defenders of Wildlife is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. Defenders programs encourage protection of entire ecosystems and interconnected habitats while protecting predators that serve as indicator species for ecosystem health. The San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society is a non-profit corporation dedicated to conserving and restoring natural ecosystems, focusing on birds and other wildlife for the benefit of humanity and the earth’s biological diversity. The California State Park Rangers Association is an organization of park professionals dedicated to advancement of the highest principles of public service, established to support and preserve California State Parks for present and future generations. The Tri-County Conservation League, Inc. is a public interest corporation with a membership that promotes the educational, recreational and conservation values of the natural resources of the Santa Ana River and its drainage system in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Orange Counties. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. .. .. .. 5 II. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK AND REQUESTED ACTION. .. .. .7 III. ECOLOGY OF THE WESTERN BURROWING OWL. .. .. .9 A. DESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .9 B. TAXONOMY. .. .. .. .. .9 C. REPRODUCTION AND GROWTH. .. .. .9 D. MOVEMENT. .. .. .. .. .11 E. FEEDING. .. .. .. .. .. .12 F. PREDATION. .. .. .. .. .. 13 IV. HABITAT REQUIREMENTS. .. .. .. .14 V. RANGE. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16 VI. HISTORICAL AND RECENT DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE. .. .. 17 A. NORTHERN COASTAL CALIFORNIA. .. .. 18 B. NORTHERN DESERT RANGE. .. .. .. 18 C. CENTRAL VALLEY. .. .. .. .. 19 1. NORTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY. .. .. 19 2. MIDDLE CENTRAL VALLEY. .. .. .21 3. SOUTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY. .. .. .27 D. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA. .. .. 30 E. CENTRAL WESTERN CALIFORNIA. .. .. .37 F. SOUTHWESTERN CALIFORNIA. .. .. .39 G. IMPERIAL VALLEY. .. .. .. .. 48 H. COACHELLA VALLEY. .. .. .. .. 49 I. SOUTHERN DESERT RANGE. .. .. .. .. .49 VII. POPULATION TRENDS. .. .. .. .53 VIII. NATURE, DEGREE, AND IMMEDIACY OF THREAT. .. .. .. .56 A. URBAN DEVELOPMENT. .. .. .. .. .56 B. THREATS TO IMPERIAL VALLEY AND SOUTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY OWL POPULATIONS. .. .. .. .. .59 C. DESTRUCTION OF BURROWING RODENTS. .. .. .. 60 D. RELOCATION OF OWLS. .. .. .. .. .61 E. AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES. .. .. .. .. 63 F. PESTICIDES. .. .. .. .. .. .65 G. PREDATION. .. .. .. .. .. 67 H. DISEASE. .. .. .. .. .. .. 68 I. SMALL POPULATION SIZES. .. .. .. .. .. 68 J. OTHER ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS. .. .. .. .69 3 IX. INADEQUACY OF EXISTING MANAGEMENT EFFORTS. .. .. .. 72 A. FEDERAL REGULATORY MECHANISMS. .. .. .. .72 B. STATE REGULATORY MECHANISMS. .. .. .. 76 C. REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT PLANS. .. .. .. .81 X. RECOMMENDED MANAGEMENT AND RECOVERY ACTIONS. .. .. .. .84 A. LIST THE BURROWING OWL AS A STATE ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 84 B. PROTECT REMAINING BREEDING GROUPS AND PAIRS AND PROTECT AND ENHANCE BREEDING HABITAT. .. .. .. .. .. .. 84 C. AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING MANAGEMENT AND LAND USE PLANS. .. 85 D. AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT SHOULD BE INVOLVED. .. .. .85 E. BURROWING OWL MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON OTHER SPECIES. .. .. 85 F. MONITORING PROGRAMS AND STUDIES. .. .. .. .. .86 XI. SIGNATURE PAGE. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .87 XII. INFORMATION SOURCES. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 88 A. INDIVIDUALS SUPPORTING PETITIONED ACTION. .. .. .. 88 B. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF LITERATURE CITED. .. .. .. .. 89 C. PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SOURCES. .. .. .. .. .114 XIII. APPENDICES. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 115 A. APPENDIX 1 – CALIFORNIA BURROWING OWL RANGE AND DISTRIBUTION MAP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 115 B. APPENDIX 2 – TABLE OF ESTIMATED DENSITY, BREEDING PAIRS, AND POPULATION TREND, BY REGION. .. .. .. .. .. .. 116 C. APPENDIX 3 – DESANTE ET AL. 1996, “THE DISTRIBUTION AND RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF BURROWING OWLS IN CALIFORNIA: EVIDENCE FOR A DECLINING POPULATION” . .. .. .. .118 4 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Petitioners Center for Biological Diversity, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, Defenders of Wildlife, San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society, California State Park Rangers Association, and Tri-County Conservation League submit this petition to list the California population of the western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea) as an endangered or threatened species under the California Endangered Species Act, Fish and Game Code §§ 2070 et seq. (“CESA”). This petition demonstrates that the western burrowing owl is in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout a significant portion of its range in California and clearly warrants listing under CESA, based on the factors discussed herein. The western burrowing owl is a small ground-nesting bird of prairie and grassland habitats, which in many areas has adapted to human-altered habitats as urban development and agriculture have eliminated natural grasslands. Burrowing owls in the western United States rely upon burrows dug by burrowing mammals for nests, primarily those of ground squirrels in California. Burrowing owls also require open fields with adequate food supply for foraging habitat, low vegetative cover to allow owls to watch for predators, and adequate roosting sites. These owls can often be seen perched or standing by their burrow or hunting insects, rodents, amphibians, or small birds in open fields. Nesting season is from February through August, with most pairs usually fledging 4 or 5 young. After the nesting season, most owls in California remain throughout the winter as year-round residents and owls from others areas augment resident California populations. Burrowing owls are susceptible to predators that can access their nest chamber, such as foxes, coyotes, skunks, raccoons, and snakes, and are also preyed upon by various other raptor species, such as hawks, eagles, and other species of owls. Burrowing owls in California historically ranged throughout the Central Valley, were found in suitable habitat in coastal areas from Marin County south to the Mexican border, and sparsely inhabited desert areas in the northeastern and southeastern portions of the state. Densities of owls in some areas of the state.
Recommended publications
  • Prey Ecology of the Burrowing Owl Athene Cunicularia Cunicularia (Molina, 1782) on the Northern Coast of Santa Catarina, Brazil
    Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/nnfe20 Prey ecology of the burrowing owl Athene cunicularia cunicularia (Molina, 1782) on the northern coast of Santa Catarina, Brazil Alana Drielle Rocha , J. O. Branco & G. H. C. Barrilli To cite this article: Alana Drielle Rocha , J. O. Branco & G. H. C. Barrilli (2021): Prey ecology of the burrowing owl Athenecuniculariacunicularia (Molina, 1782) on the northern coast of Santa Catarina, Brazil, Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2020.1867953 Published online: 13 Jan 2021. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=nnfe20 STUDIES ON NEOTROPICAL FAUNA AND ENVIRONMENT https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2020.1867953 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Prey ecology of the burrowing owl Athene cunicularia cunicularia (Molina, 1782) on the northern coast of Santa Catarina, Brazil Alana Drielle Rocha a, J. O. Branco b and G. H. C. Barrilli a aDepartment of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil; bSchool of the Sea, Science and Technology, Vale do Itajaí University, Itajaí, Brazil ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY We analyzed the diet of Athene cunicularia cunicularia in order to identify and compare prey items Received 14 August 2020 in dune populations in Santa Catarina, Brazil: Interpraias (INT), Praia Brava (BRA), Praia Central Accepted 20 December 2020 (NAV) and Peninsula (BVE). Due to the characteristics of urbanization in these regions, we hypothesized that there would be greater abundance and consumption of urban insect pests KEYWORDS Burrowing owl; dunes; diet; in the areas of BRA, NAV, and INT than in BVE.
    [Show full text]
  • Silicon Valley Chapter Military Officers Association of America
    Silicon Valley Chapter Military Officers Association of America Volume XII Issue 11The Bulletin Dec 2015 OFFICERS, BOARD, AND CHAIRS PRESIDENT: Lt. Col. Mike Sampognaro USAF merry christmas to all 408-779-7389 1st VP: Lt. Col. Jay Craddock USAF 650-968-0446 2nd VP: CWO5 Robert Landgraf USMC 408-323-8838 Secretary: COL Warren Enos AUS Luncheon Program 408-245-2217 Treasurer: CAPT Lloyd McBeth USN 408-241-3514 17 Dec 2015 Past President: CAPT Paul Barrish USN 408-356-7531 Touring Morocco DIRECTORS & COMMITTEE CHAIRS Auxiliary Liaison vacant Chaplain Chaplain Fred Tittle USMC 609-802-3492 Commissary/Exchange Advisory CDR Ralph Hunt USN 650-967-8467 Friends-in-Need (FIN) Program CDR Al Mouns USN 408-257-5629 Programs Lt. Col. Jesse Craddock USAF 650-968-0446 ROTC CWO4 Patrick Clark USA 831-402-8548 Membership/Recruitment CWO5 Robert Landgraf USMC 408-323-8838 Scholarship CAPT Paul Barrish USN 408-356-7531 Travel (Space-A Advisory) CDR V.A. Eagye USN 408-733-3177 Web Master Lt Col Mike Sampognaro USAF 408-779-7389 Veteran Affairs Col Keith Giles,USAF(ret) Lt Col Neil Miles USAF 408-929-1142 Development Officer CAPT Gil Borgardt USN 650-342-1270 Sargeant-at-Arms Social Hour: 11:00 AM CDR Ralph Hunt USN 650-967-8467 Chapter Outreach CWO5 Robert Landgraf USMC 408-323-8838 Luncheon: 11:45 AM CALMOAA, Legislation & Navy League Liaison LCDR Tom Winant USN 650-678-7120 Luncheon is $26.00 Personal Affairs CAPT Robert French USN 650-363-1188 See Back Page for Reservations Form and Directions The Chapter Board meets at the Moffett Air Traffic Control Tower, Moffett Federal Airfield Bulletin Editor It is time to renew your Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-95-133 Military Bases: Analysis of DOD's 1995 Process
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Congress and the GAO Chairman, Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission April 1995 MILITARY BASES Analysis of DOD’s 1995 Process and Recommendations for Closure md Realignment GAO/NSIAD-95-133 National Security and International Affairs Division B-26 1024 April 14,1995 To the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives The Honorable Alan J. Dixon Chairman, Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission The Secretary of Defense announced his 1995 recommendations for base closures and realignments to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission on February 28,1995. This report responds to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (P.L. 101~510), as amended, which requires that we provide the Congress and the Commission, by no later than April 15,1995, a report on the recommendations and selection process. We have identified issues for consideration by the Commission as it completes its review of the Secretary of Defense’s recommendations. Given that this is the last of three biennial reviews authorized under the 1990 act, we are also including matters for consideration by the Congress regarding the potential need for continuing Iegislation to authorize further commission reviews and authorize changes, as needed, to prior decisions We are sending copies of this report to the Chairmen, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Defense; Senate Committee on Armed Services; House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on National Security; House Committee on National Security; the Secretaries of Defense, the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force; and the Directors of the Defense Logistics Agency and the Defense Investigative Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Do the Winter Diets of Sympatric Burrowing Owl and Short-Eared Owl Overlap in West-Central Mexico?
    Proceedings of the Fourth International Partners in Flight Conference: Tundra to Tropics 96–101 DO THE WINTER DIETS OF SYMPATRIC BURROWING OWL AND SHORT-EARED OWL OVERLAP IN WEST-CENTRAL MEXICO? HÉCTOR E. VALDEZ-GÓMEZ,1,3 GEOFFREY L. HOLROYD,2 HELEN E. TREFRY,2 AND ARMANDO J. CONTRERAS-BALDERAS1 1Laboratorio de Ornitología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Ciudad Universitaria CP 66451, A.P. 425 San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, México; and 2Environment Canada, Room 200, 4999-98 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3, Canada Abstract. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) and Short-eared Owl (Asio fl ammeus) are widely dis- tributed but uncommon species during winter in Mexico. Information about their winter ecology is limited, particularly in areas where both species are present. Knowledge of their diet is an important component to understand the nocturnal raptors’ habitat requirements. We analyzed 179 pellets of Burrowing Owl and 354 pellets of Short-eared Owl collected in 2002-2003, at the Military Airbase of Zapopan, Jalisco. The owls shared three main prey categories: invertebrates, small mammals, and birds. Small mammals provided the highest proportion of biomass in the Short-eared Owl diet and invertebrates in the Burrowing Owl diet. Food-niche breadth was lower in Short-eared than in Burrowing Owl refl ecting the diversity of invertebrates in the Burrowing Owl’s diet. The dietary overlap included items of relative low mass such as Northern Pigmy Mouse (Baiomys taylori) and the Gray Bird Grasshopper (Schistocerca nitiens). Zapopan Airbase is important for these two species and others adjacent to a large metropolitan city and should be managed as wildlife habitat that is compat- ible with its function for military training.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Species Native to the USA and Canada for Which the MIL Has an Image (296) 31 July 2021
    Mammal species native to the USA and Canada for which the MIL has an image (296) 31 July 2021 ARTIODACTYLA (includes CETACEA) (38) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei - Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 7. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Bos bison - American Bison 2. Oreamnos americanus - Mountain Goat 3. Ovibos moschatus - Muskox 4. Ovis canadensis - Bighorn Sheep 5. Ovis dalli - Thinhorn Sheep CERVIDAE - deer 1. Alces alces - Moose 2. Cervus canadensis - Wapiti (Elk) 3. Odocoileus hemionus - Mule Deer 4. Odocoileus virginianus - White-tailed Deer 5. Rangifer tarandus -Caribou DELPHINIDAE - ocean dolphins 1. Delphinus delphis - Common Dolphin 2. Globicephala macrorhynchus - Short-finned Pilot Whale 3. Grampus griseus - Risso's Dolphin 4. Lagenorhynchus albirostris - White-beaked Dolphin 5. Lissodelphis borealis - Northern Right-whale Dolphin 6. Orcinus orca - Killer Whale 7. Peponocephala electra - Melon-headed Whale 8. Pseudorca crassidens - False Killer Whale 9. Sagmatias obliquidens - Pacific White-sided Dolphin 10. Stenella coeruleoalba - Striped Dolphin 11. Stenella frontalis – Atlantic Spotted Dolphin 12. Steno bredanensis - Rough-toothed Dolphin 13. Tursiops truncatus - Common Bottlenose Dolphin MONODONTIDAE - narwhals, belugas 1. Delphinapterus leucas - Beluga 2. Monodon monoceros - Narwhal PHOCOENIDAE - porpoises 1. Phocoena phocoena - Harbor Porpoise 2. Phocoenoides dalli - Dall’s Porpoise PHYSETERIDAE - sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus – Sperm Whale TAYASSUIDAE - peccaries Dicotyles tajacu - Collared Peccary CARNIVORA (48) CANIDAE - dogs 1. Canis latrans - Coyote 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Raiders and Ruins
    Raiders and Ruins By Nathan-–Patches-Reed Credits Author: Nathan Reed Publisher: Editor: Sarah Lyon Art Director: Nathan Reed Graphic Designer: Nathan Reed Layout: Nathan Reed Cover Artist: Tamas Baranya Cover Designer: Nathan Reed Interior Artists: Tamas Baranya, Don Davis, Nathan Reed, James P. Blair Diagrams: Fonts: Boycott, Arial Indexes: Nathan Reed Proofreaders: John Michael Scott, Challon Winer Miniatures in Photos: www.Brother-Vinni.com, Artizan Designs, Armorcast, WorldWorks, Reaper Miniatures, Games-Workshop. Raiders and Ruins This game references the Savage Worlds game system, available from Pinnacle Entertainment Group at www.peginc.com. Savage Worlds and all associated logos and trademarks are copyrights of Pinnacle Entertainment Group. Used with permission. Pinnacle makes no representation or warranty as to the quality, viability, or suitability for purpose of this product. Licensee indemnifies Licensor, other licensees of the Property, their officers, employees, agents, licensees, and assigns, and holds them harmless against all loss, damage, injury, and expense, including reasonable attorney’s fees, from any breach of this Agreement. 1) The licensee agrees not to reproduce material from the Savage Worlds rulebook or any other copyrighted work without the express written consent of Pinnacle Entertainment Group or the copyright holder. 2) Pinnacle Entertainment Group reserves all intellectual property rights to Savage Worlds, including, but not limited to, all copyrights, trademarks, hobby game, publishing, entertainment, licensing and merchandising rights. 3) Pinnacle Entertainment Group reserves all rights to its Intellectual Properties, including those used as examples or illustrations in the Savage Worlds rule book, promotional material, or published works. 4) This licensee agrees not to charge for the product in any way, shape, or form.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawk-Owls and Allies Genus Ninox Hodgs
    Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 264-265. Order STRIGIFORMES: Owls Regarding the following nomina dubia, see under genus Aegotheles Vigors & Horsfield: Strix parvissima Ellman, 1861: Zoologist 19: 7465. Nomen dubium. Strix parvissima Potts, 1871: Trans. N.Z. Inst. 3: 68 – Rangitata River, Canterbury. Nomen dubium. Athene (Strix) parvissima Potts; Potts 1873, Trans. N.Z. Inst. 5: 172. Nomen dubium Family STRIGIDAE Leach: Typical Owls Strigidae Leach, 1819: Eleventh room. In Synopsis Contents British Museum 15th Edition, London: 64 – Type genus Strix Linnaeus, 1758. Subfamily BUBONINAE Vigors: Hawk-owls and Allies Bubonina Vigors, 1825: Zoological Journal 2: 393 – Type genus Bubo Dumeril, 1805. Genus Ninox Hodgson Ninox Hodgson, 1837: Madras Journ. Lit. Sci. 5: 23 – Type species (by original designation) Ninox nipalensis Hodgson = Ninox scutulata lugubris (Tickell). Hieracoglaux Kaup, 1848: Isis von Oken, Heft 41: col. 768 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Falco connivens Latham = Ninox connivens (Latham). As a subgenus of Ninox. Spiloglaux Kaup, 1848: Isis von Oken, Heft 41: col. 768 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Strix boobook Latham = Ninox boobook (Latham). As a subgenus of Ninox. Ieraglaux Kaup, 1852: in Jardine, Contrib. Ornith.: 107 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Falco connivens Latham = Ninox connivens (Latham). Rhabdoglaux Bonaparte, 1854: Revue Mag. Zool. 2 (2): 543 – Type species (by subsequent designation) Athene humeralis Bonaparte = Ninox rufa humeralis (Bonaparte).
    [Show full text]
  • Letter L-Biographical and Necrological Index Cross Co., Ark
    Letter L-Biographical and Necrological Index Cross Co., Ark. by Paul V.Isbell, Mar.2,2013 Index:Partial Abair, Flossie, 180 Davis, Shelia, Mrs., 66 Armstrong, Mary, Mrs., 142 Dennett, Sarah Ann m.Lackey, Mrs. Barksdale, Steven, 159 d.1902, 14 Batchelor, Nellie Ruth m.Loyd, Mrs., 180 Douglas, Tracie m.Lawrence, Mrs., 47 Betts, John Logan d.1924, 80 Draffen, Temfy b.1863-, 114 Betts, Sarah Lavina Boyd, Mrs. d.1918, 80 Dunlap, Jessie m.Lackey, Mrs. d.1984, 14 Bibens, Kenny, 159 Eskew, Judy Jacqueline m.Lindley, Mrs., Blake, Julia m.Like, Mrs., 112 117 Blaylock, Jeannie, Mrs., 110 Evans, Douglas, 53 Boone, Darlene m.Like, Mrs., 112 Fecho, Lisa m.Lamb, Mrs., 20 Brock, Rena Mae m.Lamb, Mrs., 22 Feyen, Carolyn McAllister, Mrs., 110 Burnett, Peggy, Mrs., 142 Flippo, Margaret m.Leverett, Mrs., 91 Butler, Ann, Mrs., 66 Funston, Bernice m.Lawrence, Mrs., 48 Cantrell, Pam m.Leverette, Mrs., 91 Gaar, Catherine Jane Blandenbaker, Mrs. Casteel, Mamie m.Logan, Mrs. d.1949, 138, d.1872, 138 140 Gaar, Staunton Wilhoite d.1869, 138 Castle, Juanita, Mrs., 143 Gaddis, Bob, 84 Chambers, Monroe, 143 Ginesta, Deborah m.Love, Mrs., 154 Chance, Lodusky Jane m.Lackey, Mrs. Graddy, Thelma Louise m.Larue, Mrs. d.1971, 14 d.1998, 37 Cheney, Emma m.Loveless, Mrs., 159 Green, Maude m.Couch, Mrs., 105 Compton, Myrtle m.Larue, Mrs. d.1985, 37 Harris, Delanie m.Massey, Mrs., 137 Cook, Jo m.Martin, Mrs., 66 Hastings, Anne m.Loveless, Mrs., 159 Cook, Mattie Virgie m.Logan, Mrs. d.1947, Heindselman, Ralph, 111 140 Henderson, Raymond, 111 Couch, Bernice Dunn, Mrs., 105 Henderson, Willie Francis, Mrs., 23 Couch, John H., 105 Hendrix, Sherry Ann m.Lindley, Mrs., 117 Couch, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-Invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP)
    Herpetofauna and Aquatic Macro-invertebrate Use of the Kino Environmental Restoration Project (KERP) Tucson, Pima County, Arizona Prepared for Pima County Regional Flood Control District Prepared by EPG, Inc. JANUARY 2007 - Plma County Regional FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM Water Resources Regional Flood Control District DATE: January 5,2007 TO: Distribution FROM: Julia Fonseca SUBJECT: Kino Ecosystem Restoration Project Report The Ed Pastor Environmental Restoration ProjectiKino Ecosystem Restoration Project (KERP) is becoming an extraordinary urban wildlife resource. As such, the Pima County Regional Flood Control District (PCRFCD) contracted with the Environmental Planning Group (EPG) to gather observations of reptiles, amphibians, and aquatic insects at KERP. Water quality was also examined. The purpose of the work was to provide baseline data on current wildlife use of the KERP site, and to assess water quality for post-project aquatic wildlife conditions. I additionally requested sampling of macroinvertebrates at Agua Caliente Park and Sweetwater Wetlands in hopes that the differences in aquatic wildlife among the three sites might provide insights into the different habitats offered by KERF'. The results One of the most important wildlife benefits that KERP provides is aquatic habitat without predatory bullfrogs and non- native fish. Most other constructed ponds and wetlands in Tucson, such as the Sweetwater Wetlands and Agua Caliente pond, are fuIl of non-native predators which devastate native fish, amphibians and aquatic reptiles. The KERP Wetlands may provide an opportunity for reestablishing declining native herpetofauna. Provided that non- native fish, bullfrogs or crayfish are not introduced, KERP appears to provide adequate habitat for Sonoran Mud Turtles (Kinosternon sonoriense), Lowland Leopard Frogs (Rana yavapaiensis), and Mexican Gartersnakes (Tharnnophis eques) and Southwestern Woodhouse Toad (Bufo woodhousii australis).
    [Show full text]
  • Govt Orders Sealing of State, District Borders
    K K M % ! $ !!$ !"! % ! ! " M Y ! !!#!# " !!!#" ! Y C C JAMMU, MONDAY, MARCH 30 , 2020 VOL. 36 | NO.88 | REGD. NO. : JM/JK 118/15 /17 | E-mail : [email protected] |www.glimpsesoffuture.com | Price : Rs. 2.00 Coronavirus: Positive cases near 1,000-mark; Restrictions tightened as Kashmir records second Govt orders sealing of state, district borders COVID-19 death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
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Species Surveys in the Acquisition Areas on the Tejon Ranch, California
    MAMMALIAN SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE ACQUISITION AREAS ON THE TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR THE TEJON RANCH CONSERVANCY Prepared by: Brian L. Cypher, Christine L. Van Horn Job, Erin N. Tennant, and Scott E. Phillips California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program One University Circle Turlock, CA 95382 August 16, 2010 esrp_2010_TejonRanchsurvey.doc MAMMALIAN SPECIES SURVEYS IN THE ACQUISITION AREAS ON THE TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Study Areas ......................................................................................................................... 3 Methods............................................................................................................................... 4 Target Special Status Species .................................................................................................................... 4 Camera Station Surveys ............................................................................................................................. 4 Live-Trapping ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Spotlight Surveys ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Opportunistic Observations ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • August 25, 2021 NEW YORK FORWARD/REOPENING
    September 24, 2021 NEW YORK FORWARD/REOPENING GUIDANCE & INFORMATIONi FEDERAL UPDATES: • On August 3, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued an extension of the nationwide residential eviction pause in areas experiencing substantial and high levels of community transmission levels of SARS-CoV-2, which is aligned with the mask order. The moratorium order, that expires on October 3, 2021, allows additional time for rent relief to reach renters and to further increase vaccination rates. See: Press Release ; Signed Order • On July 27, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated its guidance for mask wearing in public indoor settings for fully vaccinated people in areas where coronavirus transmission is high, in response to the spread of the Delta Variant. The CDC also included a recommendation for fully vaccinated people who have a known exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 to be tested 3-5 days after exposure, and to wear a mask in public indoor settings for 14 days or until they receive a negative test result. Further, the CDC recommends universal indoor masking for all teachers, staff, students, and visitors to schools, regardless of vaccination status See: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019- ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated-guidance.html • The CDC on Thursday, June 24, 2021 announced a one-month extension to its nationwide pause on evictions that was executed in response to the pandemic. The moratorium that was scheduled to expire on June 30, 2021 is now extended through July 31, 2021 and this is intended to be the final extension of the moratorium.
    [Show full text]