DOCSLIB.ORG

Three Accounts of No-Self (Anatta) 1/8/2013 [email protected] Philosophy, University of New Hampshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Three Accounts of No-Self (Anatta) 1/8/2013 Drew.Christie@Unh.Edu Philosophy, University of New Hampshire Three Accounts of No-Self (Anatta) 1/8/2013 [email protected] Philosophy, University of New Hampshire Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Buddha’s practical orientation and the simile of the Poison Arrow ............................................................................. 1 SelfBrandom -- Kant, Hegel, and Sellars ............................................................................................................................. 2 Analogy - no sin ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Three opponents: Empiricism, Cartesianism and Representationalism ....................................................................... 4 Empiricism ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Cartesians .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Representationalism ............................................................................................................................. 5 Against “Bundle Theories” ............................................................................................................................................ 6 ‘I’ is a “logical locution” ......................................................................................................................... 7 Contra Atomism and Mereological Reductivism .................................................................................. 8 Natures vs. Histories – the difference consciousness makes ............................................................... 9 Against “Witness Consciousness” ................................................................................................................................. 9 Is “witness consciousness” possible?.................................................................................................. 10 Is “witness consciousness” desirable? ................................................................................................ 10 Tranformative Accounts – No Selfing ......................................................................................................................... 11 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Introduction My aim is to reconcile Buddhism, specifically the doctrine of no-self (anatta) with a broadly Kantian philosophy according to which there is a self with the vital function of maintaining a unity of apperception. The conflict is that the self either does not exist (Buddhist Philosophers) or does exist (Kant). My reason for exploring reconciliation is my appreciation of the spiritual wisdom within the Buddhist tradition along with my rejection of many of the metaphysical and phenomenological doctrines championed by Buddhist Philosophers. More specifically, I reject the empiricist, phenomenalist, Cartesion and reductionist analogues to the Western philosophical tradition that I find among prominent contemporary Buddhist Philosophers. Buddha’s practical orientation and the simile of the Poison Arrow Was the Buddha a Buddhist Philosopher? Did the Buddha think selves were “ultimately unreal,” “convenient fictions” that they “lacked genuine existence?” Not according to the well- known simile of the poison arrow that illustrates the Buddha’s focus on practice. Confronted 1 with a list of 13 metaphysical questions, the Buddha is purported to have declined answering because he found the questions inessential. "It's just as if a man were wounded with an arrow thickly smeared with poison. His friends & companions, kinsmen & relatives would provide him with a surgeon, and the man would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know whether the man who wounded me was a noble warrior, a priest, a merchant, or a worker.' He would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know the given name & clan name of the man who wounded me... until I know whether he was tall, medium, or short... until I know whether he was dark, ruddy-brown, or golden-colored... until I know… The man would die and those things would still remain unknown to him." — Cula-Malunkyovada Sutta: The Shorter Instructions to Malunkya" (MN 63), Majjhima Nikaya The Buddha was no more a Buddhist Philosopher with a doctrine of no-self (anatta) than Christ was a Christian philosopher with a theory of the Holy Trinity. My point is that we must distinguish the doctrines of Buddhist Philosophers from the practice of the Buddha. SelfBrandom -- Kant, Hegel, and Sellars The concept of selfhood which I favor comes from Robert Brandom’s interpretation and amalgamation of Kant, Hegel and Sellers. The Kant-Brandom “self” has three essential activities. With Kant we associate the requirement that a self maintain a unity of apperception. With Hegel, is associated the requirement that a self be part of a community of selves with reciprocal recognition. With Sellars, we associate the “space of reason” and the “game of giving and asking for reasons.” According to Brandom, a unity of apperception is maintained when one integrates “ones new endorsements into the whole that compromise one’s previous endorsements. One’s critical responsibility is to weed out materially incompatible commitments. For example, to synthesize the belief that someone just walked into the room is to abandon the belief that I am alone. One’s ampliative responsibility is to extract the material and inferential consequences of each commitment (e.g., there are two people in the room). “One’s justificatory responsibility is to be prepared to offer reasons for the commitments.”1 For example, that I am awake and saw the person walk in. Brandom maintains that selfhood, that is being discursive and being a member of a discursive community is what makes us who we are. We are beings with histories, not just 1 Brandom, Reasons in Philosophy (2009), p.36. 2 natures. Through discourse, we become self-defining. We are not simply biological beings, members of the species homo sapiens.2 We define ourselves by what roles we commit ourselves to: father, son, husband, professor, scholar, liberal, etc. The relevance of this point to Buddhist metaphysics is that analogies between selves and material objects are suspect: e.g., eddies, waves, clouds and chariots (King Milander). Because we are self-defining, the Existentialist slogan applies: “Existence precedes Essence.”3 This feature of the Kant-Brandom self lends itself to Existentialist readings of Buddhism: e.g, Stephen Batchelor, Alone with Others: An Existentialist approach to Buddhism.4 A further aspect of the Kant-Brandom self that is relevant from a Buddhist perspective is that a self is something that human beings acquire and develop as they become discursive and that can be lost through injury or senility. On this view, a self is a being (usually a homo sapien) in reasonable discursive working order. Such a self is clearly not eternal. Furthermore, it can change significantly as the elements of one’s unity of apperception, including self-image change significantly. The selfBrandom is a process, an activity, a role – not an essence. The Kant-Brandom notion of a self is abstract and divorced from the biology of homo sapiens. DNA is not essential. Brandom flirts with the Hegelian idea that Geist is a self. Institutions and corporations may have selvesBrandom. There is no principled reason that a computer/robot couldn’t be a Kant-Brandom self. These possibilities underscore that the Kant- Brandom self is primarily function, practice, and role, not physical matter. Brandomselves are compatible with a transformational, action-oriented account of “no- self”, but not with either of two more familiar accounts. One ontological strategy for denying the existence of a self, which I reject, is exemplified by Hume’s bundle theory of self. The second, speculative psychological view, which I also reject, posits an inner self of pure, undifferentiated, objectless-less awareness. 2 Brandom, Tales of the Might Dead (2002), p.217 3 Brandom , Tales of the Might Dead (2002), “Holism and Idealism in Hegels Phenomenology” 4 See also Philosophy of Religion, Notions of Selflessness in Sartrean Existentialism and Theravadin Buddhism, Sander H. Lee, Keene State College, [email protected] 3 Analogy - no sin An analogy should help to distinguish the three structurally distinct approaches I consider. Instead of “no self, consider a “no sin” doctrine. The ontological interpretation denies the very existence of sin. For example, an atheist might reason that without God, there are no sins. A second purity view, champions purity of heart as a state that one should strive to attain if one wants to achieve “no sin.” On the purity view, Saints are people who have attained such purity of heart that the temptation to sin is not at issue. Some believe that Christ was such that he could not sin. Christ and saints are wired-up differently; they have a different
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Self and Non-Self in Early Buddhism (Joaquin Pérez-Remón)
    THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BUDDHIST STUDIES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF A.K. Narain University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA EDITORS L.M.Joshi Ernst Steinkellner Punjabi University University of Vienna PatiaUi, India Wien, Austria Alexander W. Macdonald Jikido Takasaki Universitede Paris X University of Tokyo Nanterre, France Tokyo,Japan Hardwell Smith Robert Thurman Carleton College Amherst College Northjield, Minnesota, USA Amherst, Massachusetts, USA ASSISTANT EDITOR Roger Jackson University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Volume 8 1985 Number I CONTENTS I. ARTICLES J. Nagarjuna's Arguments Against Motion, by Kamaleswar Bhattacharya 7 2. Dharani and Pratibhdna: Memory and Eloquence of the Bodhisattvas, by J ens Braarvig 17 3. The Concept of a "Creator God" in Tantric Buddhism, by Eva K. Dargyay 31 4. Direct Perception (Pratyakja) in dGe-iugs-pa Interpre­ tations of Sautrantika,^/lnw^C. Klein 49 5. A Text-Historical Note on Hevajratantra II: v: 1-2, by lj>onard W.J. van der Kuijp 83 6. Simultaneous Relation (Sahabhu-hetu): A Study in Bud­ dhist Theory of Causation, by Kenneth K. Tanaka 91 II. BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTICES Reviews: 1. The Books o/Kiu- Te or the Tibetan Buddhist Tantras: A Pre­ liminary Analysis, by David Reigle Dzog Chen and Zen, by Namkhai Norbu (Roger Jackson) 113 2. Nagarjuniana. Studies in the Writings and Philosophy of Ndgdrjuna, by Chr. Lindtner (Fernando Tola and Carmen Dragonetti) 115 3. Selfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theravada Bud­ dhism, by Steven Collins (Vijitha Rajapakse) 117 4. Self and Non-Self in Early Buddhism, by Joaquin Perez- Remon (VijithaRajapkse) 122 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Concept of the Self in David Hume and the Buddha
    The Concept of the Self in David Hume and the Buddha Desh Raj Sirswal The concept of the self is a highly contested topic. Traditionally it belonged to speculative metaphysics. Almost every philosopher, whether Western or Indian, has tried to explore the nature of self. Generally, the self is taken as a substance which has permanent existence, which is eternal and non-specio-temporal. In some traditions, like the Hindu tradition, it is believed to take rebirth as the body perishes. Many Western philosophers also think that it is immortal. The nature of the self also has then ethical implications. The views of David Hume and Gautama Buddha on the self, which I have chosen to discuss here, are similar. Though both belong to different traditions, both are skeptical of any permanent existence of self. This is not to say that one has borrowed from the other. For the nature and purpose of denial of the self in both the philosophers is different. So a comprehensive and comparative study of their views is very interesting. It is the intention of this article to analyze and compare the philosophical positions of Gautama and Hume on the self—a problem which was of central concern to both and which has since exercised a continuing fascination for philosophers, both of the East and the West. Analysis of Hume’s Views on Self According to empiricism, human intellect and experiences are limited; so we cannot know of the absolute. David Hume, an eminent empiricist, concludes that the self is merely a composition of successive impressions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Syllabus for Higher Diploma Course In
    Syllabus for Higher Diploma Course in Buddhist Studies (A course applicable to students of the University Department) From the Academic Year 2020–2021 Approved by the Ad-hoc Board of Studies in Pali Literature and Culture Savitribai Phule Pune University 1 Savitribai Phule Pune University Higher Diploma Course in Buddhist Studies General Instructions about the Course, the Pattern of Examination and the Syllabus I. General Instructions I.1 General Structure: Higher Diploma Course in Buddhist Studies is a three-year course of semester pattern. It consists of six semesters and sixteen papers of 50 marks each. I.2 Eligibility: • Passed Advanced Certificate Course in Buddhist Studies • Passed H.S.C. or any other equivalent examination with Sanskrit / Pali / Chinese / Tibetan as one subject. I.3 Duration: Three academic years I.4 Fees: The Admission fee, the Tuition Fee, Examination Fee, Record Fee, Statement of Marks for each year of the three-year Higher Diploma course will be as per the rules of the Savitribai Phule Pune University. I.5 Teaching: • Medium of instruction - English or Marathi • Lectures: Semesters I and II - Four lectures per week for fifteen weeks each Semesters III to VI – Six lectures per week for fifteen weeks each II Pattern of Examination II.1 Assessment and Evaluation: • Higher Diploma Course examination will be held once at the end of each semester of the academic year. • The examination for the Higher Diploma Course will consist of an external examination carrying 40 marks of two hours duration and an internal examination of 10 marks for all the sixteen papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mindfulness and the Buddha's Noble Eightfold Path
    Chapter 3 Mindfulness and the Buddha’s Noble Eightfold Path Malcolm Huxter 3.1 Introduction In the late 1970s, Kabat-Zinn, an immunologist, was on a Buddhist meditation retreat practicing mindfulness meditation. Inspired by the personal benefits, he de- veloped a strong intention to share these skills with those who would not normally attend retreats or wish to practice meditation. Kabat-Zinn developed and began con- ducting mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in 1979. He defined mindful- ness as, “the awareness that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment to moment” (Kabat-Zinn 2003, p. 145). Since the establishment of MBSR, thousands of individuals have reduced psychological and physical suffering by attending these programs (see www.unmassmed.edu/cfm/mbsr/). Furthermore, the research into and popularity of mindfulness and mindfulness-based programs in medical and psychological settings has grown exponentially (Kabat-Zinn 2009). Kabat-Zinn (1990) deliberately detached the language and practice of mind- fulness from its Buddhist origins so that it would be more readily acceptable in Western health settings (Kabat-Zinn 1990). Despite a lack of consensus about the finer details (Singh et al. 2008), Kabat-Zinn’s operational definition of mindfulness remains possibly the most referred to in the field. Dozens of empirically validated mindfulness-based programs have emerged in the past three decades. However, the most acknowledged approaches include: MBSR (Kabat-Zinn 1990), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT; Linehan 1993), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT; Hayes et al. 1999), and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT; Segal et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on Max Müller's Interpretation of the Buddhist
    COMMENTS ON MAX MÜLLER'S INTERPRETATION OF THE BUDDHIST NIRVANA BY G. R. WELBON Rochester, U.S.A. Close, analytical study of ancient Indian religious terminology is a demanding discipline today engaged in by only a few scholars 1). Compounding the impressive difficulties encountered in such investiga- tions, it will be noticed, some of the terms have become incorporated into the vocabulary of contemporary non-Indians. Sanctified by several decades of inclusion in dictionaries of the various Western European languages, they have acquired an uncritical significance which makes it all the more difficult to assess their "original" and contextual signifi- cations in the Indian thought schemata. Among the terms most bedeviling in its complexity of nuance is that of nirvdna according to Buddhist usage. Recently, the distinguished Belgian scholars, Ludo and Rosane Rocher, have expressed some of the frustrations shared by many who have tried to analyse that term: Qu'on conqoive les bouddhistes comme les antagonistes conscients de l'hin- douisme ou comme les "freres des brahmanes des Upanishads", il n'en reste pas moins que le concept bouddhiste de nirvti1la a ete construit sur ou a r6agi contre des elements de 1'hindouisme plus ancien, et qu'a son tour l'hindouisme plus recent s'est enrichi de ou a r6agi contre des elements du nirvana. Nous ne traiterons pas du Nirvana dans la presente 6tude, tout d'abord, parce que le concept hindouiste de mok,?a pose à lui seul, un tel nombre de pro- blemes qu'ils ne pourront être discutés dans leur totalite, et ensuite parce que les bouddhologues, eux-memes, n'en ont resolu les problemes fondamen- 1) Among the most distinguished must be mentioned Louis Renou and Jan Gonda.
    [Show full text]
  • Nagarjuniana. Studies in the Writings and Philosophy of Nāgārjuna (Chr
    THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BUDDHIST STUDIES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF A.K. Narain University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA EDITORS L.M.Joshi Ernst Steinkellner Punjabi University University of Vienna PatiaUi, India Wien, Austria Alexander W. Macdonald Jikido Takasaki Universitede Paris X University of Tokyo Nanterre, France Tokyo,Japan Hardwell Smith Robert Thurman Carleton College Amherst College Northjield, Minnesota, USA Amherst, Massachusetts, USA ASSISTANT EDITOR Roger Jackson University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Volume 8 1985 Number I CONTENTS I. ARTICLES J. Nagarjuna's Arguments Against Motion, by Kamaleswar Bhattacharya 7 2. Dharani and Pratibhdna: Memory and Eloquence of the Bodhisattvas, by J ens Braarvig 17 3. The Concept of a "Creator God" in Tantric Buddhism, by Eva K. Dargyay 31 4. Direct Perception (Pratyakja) in dGe-iugs-pa Interpre­ tations of Sautrantika,^/lnw^C. Klein 49 5. A Text-Historical Note on Hevajratantra II: v: 1-2, by lj>onard W.J. van der Kuijp 83 6. Simultaneous Relation (Sahabhu-hetu): A Study in Bud­ dhist Theory of Causation, by Kenneth K. Tanaka 91 II. BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTICES Reviews: 1. The Books o/Kiu- Te or the Tibetan Buddhist Tantras: A Pre­ liminary Analysis, by David Reigle Dzog Chen and Zen, by Namkhai Norbu (Roger Jackson) 113 2. Nagarjuniana. Studies in the Writings and Philosophy of Ndgdrjuna, by Chr. Lindtner (Fernando Tola and Carmen Dragonetti) 115 3. Selfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theravada Bud­ dhism, by Steven Collins (Vijitha Rajapakse) 117 4. Self and Non-Self in Early Buddhism, by Joaquin Perez- Remon (VijithaRajapkse) 122 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Refuge in the Triple Gem and the 5 Lay Vows – Geshe Tenzin Zopa
    Taking Refuge in the Triple Gem and the 5 Lay Vows – Geshe Tenzin Zopa Why take Refuge? If one wishes to optimise this human life, there is much benefit to taking Refuge in the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha. Holding Refuge vows is crucial to those inspired to follow the path of the Buddha. Whether one becomes a child of the Buddha and under the protection of the Buddha or not, is determined at the time when one receives the blessing of Refuge from Buddha, Dharma and Sangha. Even though one’s family may follow the Buddha’s path and call themselves Buddhists, if one has not taken Refuge with the full understanding of what Refuge means and involves, one is not yet a Buddhist. Firstly, we need to know that we have obtained this precious human rebirth which has the 8 freedoms and the 10 Endowments which enable us to practice the Path. The Buddha has taught us that with such a precious human rebirth, we are able to embark on the 3 higher trainings namely, morality, concentration and cultivation of wisdom realising emptiness. These are critical if we wish to eradicate samsaric suffering, including that of birth, aging and death. In order to actualise the wisdom realising emptiness, one requires realisations in concentration; in order to gain realisations in concentration, one needs to live in and gain realisations of morality. Without these 3, there can be no antidote to samsara, let alone attaining enlightenment. In relation to the practice of morality, Refuge Vows forms the basis. Refuge Vows are also the foundation of all other vows such as individual liberation / pratimoksha vows, ordination vows, bodhisattva vows, tantric vows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buddhist Six-Worlds Model of Consciousness and Reality
    THE BUDDHIST SIX-WORLDS MODEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND REALITY Ralph Metzner Sonoma, California Historically there have been two main metaphors for consciousness, one spatial or topographical, the other temporal or biographical (Metzner, 1989). The spatial meta­ phor is expressed in conceptions of consciousness as like a territory, a terrain, or a field, a state one can enter into or leave, or like empty space, as in the Buddhist notion of sunyata.We could speculate that people who unconsciously adhere to a spatial conception of consciousness would tend to a certain kind of fixity of perception and worldview. The "static" aspects of experience might be in the foreground of aware­ ness, and there could be a craving for stability and persistence. From this point of view, ordinary waking consciousness is the preferred state, and "altered states" are viewed with some anxiety and suspicion-as if an "altered" state is automatically abnormal or pathological in some way. This is close to the attitude of mainstream Western thought toward alterations of consciousness: even the rich diversity of dreamlife and the changed awareness possible with introspection, psychotherapy, or meditation is regarded with suspicion by the dominant extraverted worldview. The temporal metaphor for consciousness on the other hand, is seen in conceptions such as William James' "stream of thought," or the stream of awareness, or the "flow experience"; as well as in developmental theories of consciousness going through various stages. Historically and cross-culturally, we see the temporal metaphor emphasized in the thought of the pre-Socratic philosophers Thales and Heraclitus, in the Buddhist teachings of impermanence (anicca), and in the Taoist emphasis on the flows and eddies of water as the basic underlying pattern of all being.
    [Show full text]
  • Going for Refuge to the Three Jewels Handbook Version
    Going for Refuge to the Three Jewels Study material for your retreat at Tiratanaloka Page 1 of 43 Edited by Vandananjyoti, Version 2:1, July 2020 Table of Contents Introduction to the Handbook Study Area 1. Centrality of Going for Refuge to the Three Jewels Study Area 2. Going for Refuge to the Three Jewels Study Area 3. Opening of the Dharma Eye and Stream Entry Study Area 4. Going Forth Study Area 5. The Altruistic Dimension of Going for Refuge and Joining the Order Page 2 of 43 Edited by Vandananjyoti, Version 2:1, July 2020 Introduction to the Handbook The purpose of this handbook is to give you the opportunity to look in depth at the material that we will be studying on the Going for Refuge to the Three Jewels retreat at Tiratanaloka. In this handbook we give you material to study for each area we’ll be studying on the retreat. We will also have some talks on the retreat itself where the team will bring out their own personal reflections on the topics covered. As well as the study material in this handbook, it would be helpful if you could read Sangharakshita’s book ‘The History of My Going for Refuge’. You can buy this from Windhorse Publications. There is also some optional extra study material at the beginning of each section. Some of the optional material is in the form of talks that can be downloaded from the Free Buddhist Audio website at www.freebuddhistaudio.com. These aren’t by any means exhaustive - Free Buddhist Audio is growing and changing all the time so you may find other material equally relevant! For example, at the time of writing, Vessantara has just completed a series of talks called ‘Aspects of Going for Refuge’ (2016) at Cambridge Buddhist Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Manage Brainwaves Through Meditation and Attain Samadhi
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2015): 78.96 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391 Manage Brainwaves through Meditation and Attain Samādhi Ven. Dr. Lenaagala Siriniwasa Head, Department of Sanskrit, Buddhist and Pali University of Sri Lanka Abstract: Manage Brainwaves through Meditation and attain Samādhi. At the root of all our thoughts, emotions and behaviours are connected by neurons within our brain. Brainwaves are produced by synchronized electrical pulses from masses of neurons communicating with each other. The brain waves can be observed with an EEG (or an “electroencephalograph”) - a tool that allows researchers to note brain wave patterns. Brainwaves are detected using sensors placed on the scalp. They are divided into bandwidths to describe their functions, but are best thought of as a continuous spectrum of consciousness; from slow, loud and functional - to fast, subtle, and complex. Our brain’s ability to become flexible and/or transition through various brain wave frequencies plays a large role in how successful we are at managing stress, focusing on tasks, and getting a good sleep at night. If one of the five types of brain waves is either overproduced and/or under produced in our brain, it can cause problems. Throughout the day in your waking state, your EEG will display all 5 types of brain waves at the same time. However, one particular brain wave will be dominant depending on the state of consciousness that you are in. Keywords: Brainwaves, Alpha, Beta, Theta, Gamma, Samadhi, Buddhism 1. What are the Brainwaves? At the root of all our thoughts, emotions and behaviours are connected by neurons within our brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 4 Philosophy of Buddhism
    Philosophy of Buddhism UNIT 4 PHILOSOPHY OF BUDDHISM Contents 4.0 Objectives 4.1 Introduction 4.2 The Four Noble Truths 4.3 The Eightfold Path in Buddhism 4.4 The Doctrine of Dependent Origination (Pratitya-samutpada) 4.5 The Doctrine of Momentoriness (Kshanika-vada) 4.6 The Doctrine of Karma 4.7 The Doctrine of Non-soul (anatta) 4.8 Philosophical Schools of Buddhism 4.9 Let Us Sum Up 4.10 Key Words 4.11 Further Readings and References 4.0 OBJECTIVES This unit, the philosophy of Buddhism, introduces the main philosophical notions of Buddhism. It gives a brief and comprehensive view about the central teachings of Lord Buddha and the rich philosophical implications applied on it by his followers. This study may help the students to develop a genuine taste for Buddhism and its philosophy, which would enable them to carry out more researches and study on it. Since Buddhist philosophy gives practical suggestions for a virtuous life, this study will help one to improve the quality of his or her life and the attitude towards his or her life. 4.1 INTRODUCTION Buddhist philosophy and doctrines, based on the teachings of Gautama Buddha, give meaningful insights about reality and human existence. Buddha was primarily an ethical teacher rather than a philosopher. His central concern was to show man the way out of suffering and not one of constructing a philosophical theory. Therefore, Buddha’s teaching lays great emphasis on the practical matters of conduct which lead to liberation. For Buddha, the root cause of suffering is ignorance and in order to eliminate suffering we need to know the nature of existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanations of Dukkha 383
    Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies Volume 21 • Number 2 • 1998 PIERRE ARfcNES Herm6neutique des tantra: 6tude de quelques usages du «sens cach6» 173 GEORGES DREYFUS The Shuk-den Affair: History and Nature of a Quarrel 227 ROBERT MAYER The Figure of MaheSvara/Rudra in the rNin-ma-pa Tantric Tradition 271 JOHN NEWMAN Islam in the Kalacakra Tantra 311 MAX NIHOM Vajravinaya and VajraSaunda: A 'Ghost' Goddess and her Syncretic Spouse 373 TILMANN VETTER Explanations of dukkha 383 Index to JIABS 11-21, by Torn TOMABECHI 389 English summary of the article by P. Arenes 409 TILMANN VETTER Explanations of dukkha The present contribution presents some philological observations and a historical assumption concerning the First Noble Truth. It is well-known to most buddhologists and many Buddhists that the explanations of the First Noble Truth in the First Sermon as found in the Mahavagga of the Vinayapitaka and in some other places conclude with a remark on the five upadanakkhandha, literally: 'branches of appro­ priation'. This remark is commonly understood as a summary. Practically unknown is the fact that in Hermann OLDENBERG's edition of the Mahavagga1 (= Vin I) this concluding remark contains the parti­ cle pi, like most of the preceding explanations of dukkha. The preceding explanations are: jati pi dukkha, jara pi dukkha, vyadhi pi dukkha, maranam pi dukkham, appiyehi sampayogo dukkho, piyehi vippayogo dukkho, yam p' iccham na labhati tarn2 pi dukkham (Vin I 10.26). Wherever pi here appears it obviously has the function of coordinating examples of events or processes that cause pain (not: are pain3): birth is causing pain, as well as decay, etc.4 1.
    [Show full text]