DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloading New Responsibilities and Risks Onto Those Who Remain’ (Ibid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

‘Ina ngalmun lagau malu’ (This Part of the Sea Belongs to Us): Politics, Sea rights and Fisheries Co-management in Zenadh Kes (Torres Strait) Annick Thomassin Department of Anthropology McGill University, Montreal May 2019 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Annick Thomassin 2019 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................. VI RÉSUMÉ .............................................................................................................................................................. VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................................... X ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... XIII CHAPTER ONE: PROBING THE (ANTI)POLITICS OF FISHERIES CO-MANAGEMENT ................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 CO-MANAGEMENT IN CONTEXT: THE TORRES STRAIT ...................................................................................... 4 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY........................................................................................................................... 6 MODE OF INQUIRY, ETHICS AND CONTEXT .................................................................................................... 8 Methodology 8 Ethical considerations 12 Setting the scene 14 THESIS SYNOPSIS .................................................................................................................................. 23 CHAPTER TWO: POLITICS OF CO-MANAGEMENT: THEORIES AND CONCEPTS ...................................................... 25 POLITICAL ECOLOGY .............................................................................................................................. 25 A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF WESTERN BIO-ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ............................... 31 Competing tenure regimes 36 Small scale fisheries and conventional approach to fisheries management 38 Neoliberal forces, anti-politics and resistance 41 PARADIGM ‘SHIFT’: TOWARDS CO-MANAGED FISHERIES ................................................................................. 47 Defining co-management 51 On participation and empowerment 56 INDIGENOUS ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS AND THEIR INTEGRATION WITHIN CO-MANAGEMENT ...................... 63 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 72 CHAPTER THREE: BIPOTAIM, A GLIMPSE AT THE MASIGALGAL AND KULKALGAL PRE-COLONIAL SETTLEMENT HISTORY............................................................................................................................................................... 74 FIRST ENCOUNTERS WITH EUROPEANS ....................................................................................................... 76 ii CUSTOMARY LAND AND MARINE TENURE ................................................................................................... 77 PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIALITY, GOVERNANCE AND SOCIAL ORGANISATION .......................................................... 79 A LIFEWORLD BASED ON MOVEMENT ........................................................................................................ 83 ASPECTS OF BIPOTAIM KULKALGAL FISHING ACTIVITIES AND PRESERVATION OF SEA PRODUCTS ................................ 84 TRADING RELATIONSHIPS ....................................................................................................................... 87 Extensive trading networks 87 Trading with the newcommers 91 EXPLORATION AND APPROPRIATION: MAKING TORRES STRAIT A TERRA AND MARE NULLIUS ................................... 93 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 94 CHAPTER FOUR: COLONIAL ENCOUNTERS AND ARTICULATION OF MASIGALGAL CONTEMPORANEITY ............... 96 REPERCUSSIONS AND RESPONSES TO THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE COLONIAL FRONTIER ........................................... 98 A portrait of the marine industry 98 Racial stratification of the fisheries and emergence of a ‘hybrid zone’ 100 COLONIAL CONSTRUCTION OF ISLANDERS AND ISLANDERS’ RESPONSES: THE LMS AND QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT .. 107 London Missionary Society (LMS) 107 Colonial administration of the region 110 THE EMERGENCE OF AN ISLANDER-SPECIFIC ALTERNATIVE; THE COMPANY BOATS ............................................... 116 A space for Islanders’ agency 119 Emergence of an Islander model of economic participation 121 Recasting Islanders initiatives as Islander failures: biopolitics in action 122 THE 1936 TORRES STRAIT MARITIME STRIKE: FIRST CONCERTED ATTEMPT TO SHIFT ISLANDERS/GOVERNMENT POWER RELATIONSHIP ................................................................................................................................... 125 The birth of a pan-Islander identity 130 After the Strike: amitaim and the quest for citizenship 131 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................... 134 CHAPTER FIVE: THE POST-LUGGER ERA: RE-INVENTING TORRES STRAIT FISHERIES AND ISLANDERS- GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ................................................................................................................................. 136 CAUGHT IN BETWEEN: PAPUA NEW GUINEA’S INDEPENDENCE, BORDER ISSUES AND TORRES STRAIT TREATY ............ 141 iii The Torres Strait Treaty 144 Papuan perspectives and transborder relations 151 REGAINING CONTROL OVER TORRES STRAIT LANDS AND SEAS ........................................................................ 152 Shattering an ‘Australian silence’: Mabo and the end of terra nullius 152 Secessionist Movement 158 SETTING THE TERMS OF SELF-DETERMINATION AND CONTROL OVER MARINE TERRITORIES .................................... 161 Drawing inspiration and support from abroad 164 Erasing Mare Nullius 165 CONCLUSION: A SLOW JOURNEY TOWARDS AUTONOMY AND REPOSSESSION OF SEA RIGHTS ................................. 173 PART TWO A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF TORRES STRAIT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ........................................... 176 CHAPTER SIX: IN TUNE WITH THE WINDS, THE SEA AND THE PEOPLE, INSIGHT FROM MASIG FISHERS’ QUOTIDIAN ............................................................................................................................................... 176 LIVING AND FISHING MASIG’S MARINE DOMAIN: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC ACCOUNT OF MASIG CONTEMPORARY SMALL-BOAT FISHERIES SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................... 181 Commercial fishing within Masig’s maritime domain 182 In tune with the sea, the winds and the people 217 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................... 231 CHAPTER SEVEN: FISHING PASINS AND LIFE PROJECTS ...................................................................................... 233 INHERITED BOUNDARIES: MASIG’S MARITIME DOMAIN ............................................................................... 234 Masig customary marine tenure regime 237 Exclusive zones, shared territories and the creation of relationships 242 RELATIONAL ‘HYBRID’ ECONOMY ........................................................................................................... 249 Masig small-boat fishery system in their relational hybrid economy 254 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................... 259 CHAPTER EIGHT: FISHING AND HUNTING AS MANAGEMENT: THE EVERYDAY LIFE OF MANAGING, TAKING CARE OF AND SPEAKING FOR MASIG SALTWATER DOMAIN, RESOURCES AND SMALL-BOAT FISHERIES ..................... 261 OWNER-FISHERS AS MANAGERS ............................................................................................................. 262 MASIG CONTEMPORARY MARINE ESTATE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ................................................................... 265 Internal management and fishing etiquette 265 iv Participation in mainstream monitoring efforts and development of a community-based turtle and dugong management plan 272 CONTROLLING OUTSIDERS’ ENTRIES AND USES ........................................................................................... 273 Controlling the Australian TVH (Transferrable Vessel Holder) sector 276 Managing the knowledge, managing the management 282 REPRESENTATING MASIG’S FISHERS AND COMMUNITY IN MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES ....................................... 289 CONCLUSIONS: MASIG VOICES THROUGH THE SEASCAPE .............................................................................. 295 CHAPTER NINE: ‘CO’-MANAGING TORRES STRAIT FISHERIES: PARTNERSHIP OR COLLISION OF ROOT METAPHORS? .................................................................................................................................................... 297 THE POWER OF A STRUCTURE:
Recommended publications
  • Cape York Region

    Cape York Region

    141°0'E 142°0'E 143°0'E 144°0'E 145°0'E Buru Erubam Le & Warul Ugar (Stephens (Darnley Claimant application and determination boundary data compiled from NNTT based on boundaries with areas excluded or discrete boundaries of areas being claimed) as To determine whether any areas fall within the external boundary of an application or Kawa data sourced from Department of Natural Resources, MIsinlaens daendrs E) n#e1rgy (Qld) © ITshlaendtehresy) h#a1ve been recognised by the Federal Court process. determination, a search of the Tribunal's registers and State of Queensland for that portion where their data has been used. Where the boundary of an application has been amended in the Federal Court, the databases is required. Further information is available from the Tribunals website at map shows this boundary rather than the boundary as per the Register of Native Title www.nntt.gov.au or by calling 1800 640 501 Topographic vector data is © CommonwealthM aosf iAgu Psteraolipal e(Geoscience Australia) Claims (RNTC), if a registered application. © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 Gebara 2006. and Damuth The applications shown on the map include: Non freehold land tenure sourced from DNRME (QLD) February 2019. - registered applications (i.e. those that have complied with the registration test), The Registrar, the National Native Title Tribunal and its staff, members and agents Cape York Region Islanders #1 People - new and/or amended applications where the registration test is being applied, and the Commonwealth (collectively the Commonwealth) accept no liability and give As part oYf atmhe transitional provisions of the amended Native Title Act in 1998, all - unregistered applications (i.e.
  • Lessons from Chile for Allocating Indigenous Water Rights in Australia

    Lessons from Chile for Allocating Indigenous Water Rights in Australia

    1130 UNSW Law Journal Volume 40(3) 9 BEYOND RECOGNITION: LESSONS FROM CHILE FOR ALLOCATING INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA ELIZABETH MACPHERSON I INTRODUCTION Australian water law frameworks, which authorise water use, have historically excluded indigenous people. Indigenous land now exceeds 30 per cent of the total land in Australia.1 Yet indigenous water use rights are estimated at less than 0.01 per cent of total Australian water allocations.2 In the limited situations where water law frameworks have engaged with indigenous interests, they typically conceive of such interests as falling outside of the consumptive pool’3 of water applicable to commercial uses associated with activities on land such as irrigation, agriculture, industry or tourism.4 The idea that states must recognise’ indigenous groups, and their ongoing rights to land and resources, has become the central claim of the international indigenous rights movement. 5 Claims for recognition of indigenous land and resource rights are the logical outcome of demands for indigenous rights based on ideas of reparative’ justice.6 The colonisers failed to recognise indigenous rights to land and resources at the acquisition of sovereignty, the argument goes, and the remedy is to recognise those rights now. The dominant legal mechanism BCA, LLB (Hons) (VUW), PhD (Melbourne), Lecturer, School of Law, University of Canterbury. This research was carried out while the author was undertaking a PhD at the University of Melbourne. All translations have been made by the author, with italics used for Spanish language terms. 1 Jon Altman and Francis Markham, Values Mapping Indigenous Lands: An Exploration of Development Possibilities’ (Paper presented at Shaping the Future: National Native Title Conference, Alice Springs Convention Centre, 35 June 2013) 6.
  • The Australian ‘Settler’ Colonial-Collective Problem

    The Australian ‘Settler’ Colonial-Collective Problem

    The Australian ‘Settler’ Colonial-Collective Problem Author Jones, David John Published 2017 Thesis Type Thesis (Professional Doctorate) School Queensland College of Art DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2241 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365954 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au The Australian ‘Settler’ Colonial-Collective Problem David John Jones Dip VA, BVA Hons, MAVA Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Visual Arts Queensland College of Art Art, Education and Law Griffith University June 2017 1 Abstract This studio-based project identifies and interrogates the Australian denial of violent national foundation as a ‘settler’ problem, which is framed by the contemporary clinical and social concept of a ‘vicious cycle of anxiety’. The body of work I have produced aims to disrupt the denial of invasion and the erasure of Aboriginal culture through accepted narratives of European settlement of Australia. By aligning collective denial with anxiety, it presents a pathway for remediation through situational exposure; in this case, through works of art. The critical perspective on the invasion and colonisation of Australia is presented in the discursive and non- discursive modes of communication of the coloniser not to arbitrate or appease but to amplify the content. The structure of the exegesis also draws from Aboriginal narrative methodology and integrates with, and is informed by, the studio production in printmaking using demanding traditional European graphic techniques such as etching and aquatint. 2 Statement of Originality: This work has not previously been submitted for a degree or diploma in any university.
  • Cape York Region Islanders #1 Non Freehold Land Tenure Sourced from Department of Resources (QLD) March 2021

    Cape York Region Islanders #1 Non Freehold Land Tenure Sourced from Department of Resources (QLD) March 2021

    141°0'E 142°0'E 143°0'E 144°0'E 145°0'E Buru & Erubam Le Warul Kawa Masig People Ugar (Stephens Claimant application and determination boundary data compiled from NNTT based( Doanrnbloeuyndaries with areas excluded or discrete boundaries of areas being claimed) as To determine whether any areas fall within the external boundary of an application or and Damuth Islanders) #1 data sourced from Department of Resources (Qld) © The State of Queensland foIsr ltahnadt etrhse)y # h1ave been recognised by the Federal Court process. determination, a search of the Tribunal's registers and People portion where their data has been used. Where the boundary of an application has been amended in the Federal Court, the databases is required. Further information is available from the Tribunals website at map shows this boundary rather than the boundary as per the Register of Native Title www.nntt.gov.au or by calling 1800 640 501 Topographic vector data is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) Claims (RNTC), if a registered application. © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 Gebara 2006. The applications shown on the map include: Cape York Region Islanders #1 Non freehold land tenure sourced from Department of Resources (QLD) March 2021. - registered applications (i.e. those that have complied with the registration test), The Registrar, the National Native Title Tribunal and its staff, members and agents - new and/or amended applications where the registration test is being applied, and the Commonwealth (collectively the Commonwealth) accept no liability and give As part Yofa mthe transitional provisions of the amended Native Title Act in 1998, all - unregistered applications (i.e.
  • Critical Australian Indigenous Histories

    Critical Australian Indigenous Histories

    Transgressions critical Australian Indigenous histories Transgressions critical Australian Indigenous histories Ingereth Macfarlane and Mark Hannah (editors) Published by ANU E Press and Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Monograph 16 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Transgressions [electronic resource] : critical Australian Indigenous histories / editors, Ingereth Macfarlane ; Mark Hannah. Publisher: Acton, A.C.T. : ANU E Press, 2007. ISBN: 9781921313448 (pbk.) 9781921313431 (online) Series: Aboriginal history monograph Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Indigenous peoples–Australia–History. Aboriginal Australians, Treatment of–History. Colonies in literature. Australia–Colonization–History. Australia–Historiography. Other Authors: Macfarlane, Ingereth. Hannah, Mark. Dewey Number: 994 Aboriginal History is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Treasurer/Public Officer), Ingereth Macfarlane (Secretary/ Managing Editor), Richard Baker, Gordon Briscoe, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Christine Hansen, Luise Hercus, David Johnston, Steven Kinnane, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Ann McGrath, Frances Peters- Little, Kaye Price, Deborah Bird Rose, Peter Radoll, Tiffany Shellam Editors Ingereth Macfarlane and Mark Hannah Copy Editors Geoff Hunt and Bernadette Hince Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to Aboriginal History, Box 2837 GPO Canberra, 2601, Australia. Sales and orders for journals and monographs, and journal subscriptions: T Boekel, email: [email protected], tel or fax: +61 2 6230 7054 www.aboriginalhistory.org ANU E Press All correspondence should be addressed to: ANU E Press, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected], http://epress.anu.edu.au Aboriginal History Inc.
  • SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8

    SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8

    SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8 table of contents Systems Interoperability Framework™ SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8 March 18, 2021 This version: http://specification.sifassociation.org/Implementation/AU/3.4.8/index.html Previous version: http://specification.sifassociation.org/Implementation/AU/3.4.7/ Latest version: http://specification.sifassociation.org/Implementation/AU/ Schemas SIF_Message (single file, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (single file, annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (includes, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) SIF_Message (includes, annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (single file, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (single file, annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (includes, non-annotated) (ZIP archive) DataModel (includes, annotated) (ZIP archive) Note: SIF_Message schemas define every data object element as optional per SIF's Publish/Subscribe and SIF Request/Response Models; DataModel schemas maintain the cardinality of all data object elements. JSON-PESC XSLT JSON-PESC XSLT 3.4.X support (GitHub Repository) Please refer to the errata for this document, which may include some normative corrections. This document is also available in these non-normative formats: ZIP archive, PDF (for printing as a single file), Excel spreadsheet. Copyright ©2021 Systems Interoperability Framework (SIF™) Association. All Rights Reserved. 1 of 564 16/03/2021, 2:20 pm SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8 2 of 564 16/03/2021, 2:20 pm SIF Implementation Specification (Australia) 3.4.8 1 Preamble 1.1 Abstract 1.1.1 What is SIF? SIF is not a product, but a technical blueprint for enabling diverse applications to interact and share data related to entities in the pK-12 instructional and administrative environment.
  • Social Justice and Native Title Report 2016

    Social Justice and Native Title Report 2016

    Social Justice and Native Title Report 2016 ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER SOCIAL JUSTICE COMMISSIONER The Australian Human Rights Commission encourages the dissemination and exchange of information provided in this publication. All material presented in this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia, with the exception of: • The Australian Human Rights Commission Logo • Photographs and images • Any content or material provided by third parties The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website, as is the full legal code for the CC BY 3.0 AU licence. Attribution Material obtained from this publication is to be attributed to the Commission with the following copyright notice: © Australian Human Rights Commission 2016. Social Justice and Native Title Report 2016 ISSN: 2204-1125 (Print version) Acknowledgements The Social Justice and Native Title Report 2016 was drafted by Akhil Abraham, Allyson Campbell, Amber Roberts, Carly Patman, Darren Dick, Helen Potts, Julia Smith, Kirsten Gray, Paul Wright and Robynne Quiggin. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner thanks the following staff of the Australian Human Rights Commission: Isaiah Dawe, Michelle Lindley, John Howell, Leon Wild, Emily Collett and the Investigation and Conciliation Section. Special thanks to the following Aboriginal communities and organisations who feature in this report: the Quandamooka people for allowing us to host the Indigenous Property Rights Banking Forum at Minjerribah, The Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) for hosting our Indigenous Property Rights Network meeting, Yothu Yindi Foundation CEO, Denise Bowden and Sean Bowden for facilitating permission for use of the photo of Mr Pupuli and the Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia for facilitating permission for use of the photo of Mrs Roe.
  • The Toohey Legacy: Rights and Freedoms, Compassion and Honour

    The Toohey Legacy: Rights and Freedoms, Compassion and Honour

    57 THE TOOHEY LEGACY: RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, COMPASSION AND HONOUR GREG MCINTYRE* I INTRODUCTION John Toohey is a person whom I have admired as a model of how to behave as a lawyer, since my first years in practice. A fundamental theme of John Toohey’s approach to life and the law, which shines through, is that he remained keenly aware of the fact that there are groups and individuals within our society who are vulnerable to the exercise of power and that the law has a role in ensuring that they are not disadvantaged by its exercise. A group who clearly fit within that category, and upon whom a lot of John’s work focussed, were Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. In 1987, in a speech to the Student Law Reform Society of Western Australia Toohey said: Complex though it may be, the relation between Aborigines and the law is an important issue and one that will remain with us;1 and in Western Australia v Commonwealth (Native Title Act Case)2 he reaffirmed what was said in the Tasmanian Dam Case,3 that ‘[t]he relationship between the Aboriginal people and the lands which they occupy lies at the heart of traditional Aboriginal culture and traditional Aboriginal life’. A University of Western Australia John Toohey had a long-standing relationship with the University of Western Australia, having graduated in 1950 in Law and in 1956 in Arts and winning the F E Parsons (outstanding graduate) and HCF Keall (best fourth year student) prizes. He was a Senior Lecturer at the Law School from 1957 to 1958, and a Visiting Lecturer from 1958 to 1965.
  • Queensland V Congoo: the Confused Re- Emergence of a Rationale of Equality?

    Queensland V Congoo: the Confused Re- Emergence of a Rationale of Equality?

    QUEENSLAND V CONGOO: THE CONFUSED RE- EMERGENCE OF A RATIONALE OF EQUALITY? ZOE BUSH* In State of Queensland v Congoo [2015] HCA 17 (13 May 2015), the High Court applied principles of extinguishment to determine the effect of military orders under reg 54 of the National Security (General) Regulations 1940 (Cth) on the native title rights and interests of the Bar- Barrum People. The Court’s split decision casts questions of extinguishment back to the ‘legal jungle’. Amongst the thicket, the re- emergence of a ‘rationale of equality’ can be glimpsed in the statutory majority’s emphasis on the standard of ‘clear and plain intention’. The requirement of a clear and plain legislative intention to expropriate existing property rights without compensation is well established. On the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta, its extension to the extinguishment of native title would accord with the fundamental rule of law in c 29 that ‘[n]o Freeman shall… be desseised… but by… the law of the Land’. I INTRODUCTION Queensland v Congoo1 is the most recent High Court decision regarding the common law principles of extinguishment of native title. The case concerned the effect of military orders under reg 54 of the National Security (General) Regulations 1940 (Cth) (‘Regulations’) over land that was later subject to a native title claim by the Bar-Barrum People in 2001. Despite all purporting to apply the test of inconsistency of rights in Western Australia v Ward,2 the Court delivered a decision split three to three. Pursuant to s 23(2)(a) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), the appeal from the decision of the Full Federal Court in Congoo v Queensland3 was dismissed.
  • Path to Treaty

    Path to Treaty

    Report from the Treaty Working Group on Queensland’s PATH TO TREATY February 2020 Copyright Copyright © State of Queensland, February 2020. Copyright protects this publication. Excerpts may be reproduced with acknowledgment of the State of Queensland. This document is licensed by the State of Queensland under a Creative Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 Australian license. CC BY License Summary Statement: In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt the Report from the Treaty Working Group on Queensland’s Path to Treaty as long as you attribute the work to the State of Queensland. To view a copy of this license, visit: www. creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. The information in this publication is general and does not take into account individual circumstances or situations. Disclaimer Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples are warned the photographs in this publication may contain images of deceased persons which may cause sadness or distress. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................4 Introduction and history 4 Treaties and agreement making 4 Community engagement process and findings 4 Conclusions 5 Recommendations 5 MESSAGE FROM THE TREATY WORKING GROUP ..................................................8 MEET THE TREATY WORKING GROUP AND EMINENT PANEL ..................................8 GLOSSARY AND TERMINOLOGY ........................................................................ 13 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 14 1. A BRIEF HISTORY OF QUEENSLAND ..............................................................
  • Indigenous Equality: the Long Road

    Indigenous Equality: the Long Road

    INDIGENOUS EQUALITY: THE LONG ROAD GREG MCINTYRE SC This essay identifies some of incremental progress towards substantive racial equality in Australia for First Nations Peoples observed in the course of a legal practice extending over the past 44 years, affected by cases brought before the courts, particularly the case of Mabo v Queensland. It discusses the impact on that progress of legislation, particularly the Native Title Act. It concludes that recognition of the fiduciary duty of the Government towards its First Nations Peoples may be a necessary prerequisite to according them self determination and equality within the Australian nation. LLB (UWA) 1974, Barrister, Michael Kirby Chambers, Western Australia, Adjunct Professor, UNDA and UWA. INDIGENOUS EQUALITY: THE LONG ROAD VOL 8(2) 2021 CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................2 II MY INTRODUCTION TO INDIGENOUS EQUALITY...........................................................................3 III LITIGATION OR LEGISLATION……………………….........................................................................5 IV LEGISLATING NATIVE TITLE........................................................................................................5 V PUSHING BACK THE STATES........................................................................................................6 VI PASTORAL LEASES V NATIVE TITLE............................................................................................7
  • What's New in Native Title February 2014

    What's New in Native Title February 2014

    WHAT’S NEW IN NATIVE TITLE FEBRUARY 2014 1. Case Summaries .................................................................................................................................. ? 2. Legislation .......................................................................................................................................... ? 3. Indigenous Land Use Agreements ....................................................................................................... ? 4. Native Title Determinations ................................................................................................................ ? 5. Future Acts Determinations ................................................................................................................ ? 6. Registered Native Title Bodies Corporate ............................................................................................ ? 7. Native Title in the News ...................................................................................................................... ? 8. Related Publications ........................................................................................................................... ? 9. Training and Professional Development Opportunities ........................................................................ ? 10. Events ............................................................................................................................................... ? 1. Case Summaries Congoo on behalf of the Bar-Barrum People