Arxiv:1912.10397V1 [Quant-Ph] 22 Dec 2019 Ment

Single-Spin Magnetomechanics with Levitated Micromagnets J. Gieseler,1 A. Kabcenell,1 E. Rosenfeld,1 J. D. Schaefer,1 A. Safira,1 M. J. A. Schuetz,1 C. Gonzalez-Ballestero,2, 3 C. C. Rusconi,4 O. Romero-Isart,2, 3 and M. D. Lukin1 1Physics Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02318, USA. 2Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information of the Austrian Academy of sciences, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. 3Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. 4Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Strasse 1, 85748 Garching, Germany. (Dated: December 24, 2019) We demonstrate a new mechanical transduction platform for individual spin qubits. In our approach, single micro-magnets are trapped using a type-II superconductor in proximity of spin qubits, enabling direct magnetic coupling between the two systems. Controlling the distance between the magnet and the superconductor during cooldown, we demonstrate three dimensional trapping with quality factors around one million and kHz trapping frequencies. We further exploit the large magnetic moment to mass ratio of this mechanical oscillator to couple its motion to the spin degree of freedom of an individual nitrogen vacancy center in diamond. Our approach provides a new path towards interfacing individual spin qubits with mechanical motion for testing quantum mechanics with mesoscopic objects, realization of quantum networks, and ultra-sensitive metrology. Realizing coherent coupling between individual spin in the solid state [3], quantum sensing [20–22] and quan- degrees of freedom and massive mechanical modes is an tum communication [23]. outstanding challenge in quantum science and engineer- Before proceeding, we note that low dissipation me- ing. Such a coupling could be used to create mechani- chanical resonators based on magnetic levitation have cal systems with a strong quantum non-linearity, allow- been explored previously [24, 25]. However, experiments ing preparation of macroscopic quantum states of motion with superconducting levitation have so far been limited [1]. In addition, mechanical systems can be used to medi- to millimeter-scale magnets [24, 26–28]. A recent ex- ate effective spin-spin interactions between distant spin- periment [29] demonstrated superconducting levitation qubits [2], enabling applications ranging from quantum of micro-magnets, but without spin-mechanical coupling information processing [3] and sensing [4–6] to tests of and with much lower frequencies and Q-factors than fundamental physics [7,8]. One particularly promising shown here. Levitated spin-mechanical systems in which approach is to engineer a strong spin-mechanical coupling the spin is hosted inside the resonator have been imple- via magnetic field gradients [9–13]. Achieving strong mented with nano-diamonds containing NV-center de- spin-resonator coupling requires a combination of high fects trapped in optical tweezers [30, 31], Paul traps [32– quality mechanical resonators, strong magnetic field gra- 34] and magneto-gravitational traps [35, 36]. Nonethe- dients, and spin qubits with very long spin coherence less, the challenge remains to integrate these systems times. with strong magnetic field gradients, long coherence NV- In this Letter, we propose and demonstrate a new centers and operation under ultra-high vacuum condi- platform for strong spin-mechanical coupling based on tions. Our approach fulfills all these criteria simultane- levitated microscopic magnets coupled to the electronic ously (Fig.1). ground state manifold of a single nitrogen vacancy (NV) Levitation of micromagnets We levitate single hard center in diamond (Fig.1). The key idea is to utilize a micro-magnets with a thin film of the type-II supercon- levitated magnet that is localized in free space by elec- ductor (sc), yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) (c.f. tromagnetic fields. In such a system, dissipation is min- Fig.1). Since we do not apply additional magnetic fields, imized since there is no direct contact with the environ- the micromagnet is the only magnetic field source. Thus, arXiv:1912.10397v1 [quant-ph] 22 Dec 2019 ment. Specifically, we make use of a levitating mechan- the magnetic flux through the YBCO film is determined ical resonator based on magnetostatic fields. This ap- only by the distance hcool between the magnet and the proach not only avoids clamping losses, but also circum- YBCO film, the orientation of the magnet θcool, the mag- vents photon recoil and heating associated with optical netization of the magnet, and its radius a. After cooling levitation [14–16] and is therefore predicted to yield large the YBCO film below its critical temperature Tc ≈ 90K, mechanical quality factors [17, 18]. it becomes superconducting and magnetic flux that pen- In addition, the levitated magnet naturally generates etrates the film is frozen in. As a consequence, below the strong magnetic field gradient that is required for Tc, motion of the magnet induces currents in the super- spin-mechanical coupling. We specifically demonstrate conductor that counteract changes in the magnetic field. the coupling to an individual NV-center, one of the most This allows for stable 3D trapping using a procedure il- studied color centers in diamond [19]. Besides optical lustrated in (Fig.2a). The levitation height (hlev) and initialization and readout, the NV-center features long trapping frequencies ωj (j = x, y, z) depend on the con- coherence times even at room temperature, which makes ditions during cooldown, which we can control by adjust- it an attractive candidate for scalable quantum networks ing the relative distance between the superconductor and 2 a) b) a) b) camera nitrogen-vacany center hlev hcool diamond silicon pocket cryostat magnetic field set height cool down approach & levitate membrane c) 100 100 superconductor ) piezo stack 1 2 101 1 10 m 10 ( 0 2 10 10 2 x y y 10 2 1 FIG. 1. Concept of the experiment. (a) Individual micro- ) 10 z 0 200 400 H 3 3 scopic hard ferromagnets are isolated in microfabricated pock- / 10 10 2 time (s) ets and levitated with a type II superconductor, exploiting its m ( flux trapping properties. The magnet’s stray field allows for 4 4 D 10 10 S efficient coupling between the magnet’s motional degrees of P freedom and bulk nitrogen vacancy centers in the nearby dia- 10 5 z 10 5 mond, which generally feature long spin coherence times. (b) The coupling λ depends on the relative orientation of the NV- 10 6 10 6 center, ns, the magnetic moment nµ, the direction of motion of the magnet nm, the distance between the magnet and the 10 7 10 7 0 0.805 0.815 0.83 0.84 0.85 2.25 2.30 NV-center r , the magnet radius a and the frequencies of the frequency (kHz) motion. d) e) 1.2 z y x 1.0 103 ) the particle during cooldown (hcool). 6 0 1 ( 0.8 We observe the levitated magnet through a long work- r o t ing distance microscope objective that is positioned out- c a f 0.6 side the vacuum chamber, and record its motion with - Q a fast camera (Fig.2b). From the video frames, we ex- frequency (Hz) 102 0.4 tract time-traces of the particle’s center-of-mass position 23.2 m 15.5 m in the camera coordinate system (xc(t), yc(t)) and cal- 0.2 culate their power spectral densities (PSD). The distinct 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 peaks in the PSD shown correspond to the three center- hlev/a frequency (kHz) of-mass modes ωj/2π (Fig.2c). Fig.2d displays the center-of-mass frequencies as a FIG. 2. Mechanical properties of levitated micro-magnets. ¯ (a) To levitate the magnets, we adjust the magnet-sc dis- function of the normalized levitation height hlev = hlev/a tance above the critical temperature Tc. Then we cool the for two particles with radius a1 = 23.2 ± 0.7µm and sc below Tc to freeze in the magnetic flux from the mag- a2 = 15.5 ± 0.3µm, respectively. The lines are a fit net. After cooldown, we reduce the distance until the mag- ¯ ¯−β to a power law f(hlev) = fmaxhlev , where fmax is the net begins to levitate. (b) We observe the magnet motion frequency in the limit when the gap between the parti- through a microscope objective and record its motion with cle and the superconductor goes to zero. In our experi- a video camera. (c) Power spectral density extracted from ment, we find fmax = (2.3 ± 0.4, 2.4 ± 0.4, 5.6 ± 1.0)kHz video analysis of the magnet motion in the vertical (hori- and β = (1.9 ± 0.1, 2.1 ± 0.1, 2.0 ± 0.1) for particle 1 zontal) direction, corresponding to the data shown as circles in (e). The inset shows a typical ringdown measurement of and fmax = (8.8 ± 1.1, 9.5 ± 1.1, 25.2 ± 3.3)kHz and β = (2.1±0.1, 2.1±0.1, 2.3±0.1) for particle 2, which is in the y-mode (ωy = 0.839kHz) from which we extract the Q- good agreement with the expected value of β = 2.5 from factor. (d) Frequencies of center-of-mass motion as a function of the levitation height normalized to magnet radius. Dashed a simple dipole model [SI]. The measured center-of-mass (solid) lines show the three center-of-mass modes for mag- frequencies are comparable to those achieved with optical net 1 (2). (e) Q-factor as a function of trap frequency for levitation [37] and significantly exceed motional frequen- magnet 2. Each symbol corresponds to a different levitation cies in Paul traps [38] and magneto-gravitational traps experiment and the different colors corresponds to the three [35, 36].

Load more