DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Plan for Invasive Northern Pike in Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management Plan for Invasive Northern Pike in Alaska Management Plan for Invasive Northern Pike in Alaska Photo by Jim Lavakras, Compliments of Anchorage Daily News Prepared by: Southcentral Alaska Northern Pike Control Committee Table of Contents Section Page List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Figures.......................................................................................................................... iv List of Appendices ................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Aquatic Nuisance Species................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Northern Pike Introductions................................................................................................ 3 Native Range................................................................................................................. 3 International ................................................................................................................. 3 United Statesl................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Biology of Northern Pike....................................................................................................3 1.4 Problems with Northern Pike.............................................................................................. 4 Ecological ..................................................................................................................... 4 Economic....................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Status of Northern Pike In Alaska ...................................................................................... 5 Native Range................................................................................................................. 5 History of Pike Introductions........................................................................................ 6 Northern and Western Cook Inlet................................................................................. 6 Anchorage Area ............................................................................................................ 7 Kenai Peninsula............................................................................................................ 7 Southeast....................................................................................................................... 8 Prince William Sound/ Copper River ........................................................................... 8 1.6 Current Pike Eradication Projects....................................................................................... 9 1.7 Alaska’s Preliminary Pike Control Activities..................................................................... 9 1.8 Plan Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................ 10 II. Problem Statement ................................................................................................................... 11 III. Invasive Northern Pike Management Strategy ....................................................................... 11 IV. Planning Process..................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Outreach, Information & Education ................................................................................. 12 4.2 Prevention ......................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Partnerships....................................................................................................................... 13 4.4 Interagency Coordination.................................................................................................. 13 4.5 Research Investigations .................................................................................................... 13 4.6 Pathway Analysis.............................................................................................................. 13 4.7 Steps in the Process........................................................................................................... 14 Detection and Monitoring (step 1)................................................................................. 14 Assessment (step 2)........................................................................................................ 14 Proposed Management Actions (step 3) ........................................................................ 15 Public Involvement (step 4)........................................................................................... 15 Management Action Implementation (step 5) ............................................................... 16 Restoration Evaluation (step 6)...................................................................................... 16 V. Evaluation of Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 16 5.1 Analysis of Pike Control Techniques and Management Options ..................................... 16 ii Techniques for Lacustrine Habitats ............................................................................... 16 Lake Barriers....................................................................................................... 16 Passage Restrictions........................................................................................... 17 Prey Manipulations/ Control in Lakes ............................................................... 17 Discontinue Lake Enhancement ........................................................................ 19 Harvest Strategies in Lakes................................................................................ 19 Techniques for Riverine Habitats .................................................................................. 20 River Barriers..................................................................................................... 20 Prey Manipulations/ Control in Rivers .............................................................. 21 Harvest Strategies in Rivers............................................................................... 21 Techniques for Habitat Manipulation ............................................................................ 22 Aquatic Vegetation Removal............................................................................. 22 Physical Parameters Manipulation..................................................................... 23 Dewatering......................................................................................................... 24 Pressure.............................................................................................................. 24 Techniques for Pike or Prey Removal ........................................................................... 25 Electrofishing..................................................................................................... 25 Sterilization........................................................................................................ 26 Winterkill ........................................................................................................... 26 Bounty................................................................................................................ 27 Chemical Treatments ......................................................................................... 28 Other Chemical Compounds.............................................................................. 29 Biological Treatments........................................................................................ 30 5.2 Techniques for Managing a Pike Fishery ......................................................................... 31 5.3 Consequences of Inaction ................................................................................................. 32 5.4 Summary of Restoration Findings .................................................................................... 32 Acknowledgements................................................................................................................. 33 VI. References............................................................................................................................... 33 iii Section Page List of Tables Table 1. Confirmed and suspected pike waters in the Upper Cook Inlet Management Area 38 Table 2. Confirmed and suspected pike waters in the Anchorage Management Area........... 41 Table 3. Confirmed and suspected pike waters in the Kenai Peninsula Management Area.. 42 List of Figures Figure 1. Locations of Non-indigenous northern pike in the United States .......................... 43 Figure 2. Photograph of a Northern Pike ............................................................................... 44 Figure 3. Native and non-native ranges of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Temagami Area Rock Art and Indigenous Routes
    Zawadzka Temagami Area Rock Art 159 Beyond the Sacred: Temagami Area Rock Art and Indigenous Routes Dagmara Zawadzka The rock art of the Temagami area in northeastern Ontario represents one of the largest concentrations of this form of visual expression on the Canadian Shield. Created by Algonquian-speaking peoples, it is an inextricable part of their cultural landscape. An analysis of the distribution of 40 pictograph sites in relation to traditional routes known as nastawgan has revealed that an overwhelming majority are located on these routes, as well as near narrows, portages, or route intersections. Their location seems to point to their role in the navigation of the landscape. It is argued that rock art acted as a wayfinding landmark; as a marker of places linked to travel rituals; and, ultimately, as a sign of human occupation in the landscape. The tangible and intangible resources within which rock art is steeped demonstrate the relationships that exist among people, places, and the cultural landscape, and they point to the importance of this form of visual expression. Introduction interaction in the landscape. It may have served as The boreal forests of the Canadian Shield are a boundary, resource, or pathway marker. interspersed with places where pictographs have Therefore, it may have conveyed information that been painted with red ochre. Pictographs, located transcends the religious dimension of rock art and most often on vertical cliffs along lakes and rivers, of the landscape. are attributed to Algonquian-speaking peoples and This paper discusses the rock art of the attest, along with petroglyphs, petroforms, and Temagami area in northeastern Ontario in relation lichen glyphs, to a tradition that is at least 2000 to the traditional pathways of the area known as years old (Aubert et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Map Overviewnewshistoryorganization
    Uploads Site Map Contact From Overview News HistoryOrganization Membership Home Map Project Us The Field Site Map Site Map Overview News . General News . 2014 Annual General Meeting Sunday, 21 September 2014 16:45 Friends of Temagami is happy to announce our Annual General Meeting on Saturday November 8, 2014 at Smoothwater of Temagami. Our guest speaker this year is Preston Ciere - portageur.ca. Preston will be speaking at 7:30 p.m. All are welcome to attend the AGM meeting and to hear Preston speak. Wolf Lake Coalition to press Provincial Candidates and Leaders Wednesday, 28 May 2014 20:12 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 28, 2014 Wolf Lake Coalition to press provincial candidates’ and leaders’ commitment to protecting world’s largest old-growth red pine forest. North Bay — As the provincial election nears its climax, a coalition of 30 businesses and organizations says the time is now for candidates and party leaders to commit to protecting the world‘s largest remaining stand of old-growth red pine. The Wolf Lake Coalition is using a variety of approaches to seek support from candidates in three ridings and the party leaders for protecting the old-growth forest surrounding Wolf Lake. The forest, located in Greater Sudbury, is part of the Temagami region renowned for its forests, lakes, wildlife and diverse recreational and ecotourism opportunities. Though slated to become part of a network of protected areas, mineral claims and leases have blocked the transfer of the lands into the park system. Unfortunately, the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines has failed to seize past opportunities to let the claims and leases expire, as promised.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskellunge: a Michigan Resource
    Muskellunge: A Michigan Resource The muskellunge, or musky, is a tremendous game fish native to the lakes and streams of Michigan. The musky also is a fish of many myths regarding its’ appetite, size and elusiveness. The stories about muskies portray a fish feeding on anything that moves and can fit down their tooth-filled jaws…yet believed to be so difficult to catch that the musky is called “the fish of 10,000 casts.” Here, we briefly explore the mythical, legendary and genuine muskellunge. IDENTIFICATION Muskellunge are members of the esocid family of fish, which also includes the northern pike. This particular family of fish, technically called Esocidae, share similar characteristics such as long thin bodies and soft-rayed fins. These fish have large mouths full of sharp teeth. Muskellunge and pike are identified as piscivores, which means their primary diet is fish. Though similar in appearance, muskellunge tend to achieve larger sizes than northern pike. The musky’s coloration is one of dark stripes, or dark spots, on a light background. Northern pike, in contrast, usually have light, bean-shaped spots on a dark background. The shape of the tail fin is a good method of identification as a musky’s is pointed and the tail fin of a pike is rounded. Another key characteristic for identification is the presence or absence of scales on the cheeks and gill covers. Muskies only have scales on the upper half of the cheek and gill cover. Like the muskellunge, the northern pike gill cover has scales on the upper half, but the cheek is fully scaled.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Communities of Baltic Coastal Fish Executive Summary: Assessment of Coastal fi Sh in the Baltic Sea
    Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 103 B Changing Communities of Baltic Coastal Fish Executive summary: Assessment of coastal fi sh in the Baltic Sea Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 103 B Changing Communities of Baltic Coastal Fish Executive summary: Assessment of coastal fi sh in the Baltic Sea Helsinki Commission Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Editor: Janet Pawlak Authors: Kaj Ådjers (Co-ordination Organ for Baltic Reference Areas) Jan Andersson (Swedish Board of Fisheries) Magnus Appelberg (Swedish Board of Fisheries) Redik Eschbaum (Estonian Marine Institute) Ronald Fricke (State Museum of Natural History, Stuttgart, Germany) Antti Lappalainen (Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute), Atis Minde (Latvian Fish Resources Agency) Henn Ojaveer (Estonian Marine Institute) Wojciech Pelczarski (Sea Fisheries Institute, Poland) Rimantas Repečka (Institute of Ecology, Lithuania). Photographers: Visa Hietalahti p. cover, 7 top, 8 bottom Johnny Jensen p. 3 top, 3 bottom, 4 middle, 4 bottom, 5 top, 8 top, 9 top, 9 bottom Lauri Urho p. 4 top, 5 bottom Juhani Vaittinen p. 7 bottom Markku Varjo / LKA p. 10 top For bibliographic purposes this document should be cited as: HELCOM, 2006 Changing Communities of Baltic Coastal Fish Executive summary: Assessment of coastal fi sh in the Baltic Sea Balt. Sea Environ. Proc. No. 103 B Information included in this publication or extracts thereof is free for citing on the condition that the complete reference of the publication is given as stated above Copyright 2006 by the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission - Helsinki Commission - Design and layout: Bitdesign, Vantaa, Finland Printed by: Erweko Painotuote Oy, Finland ISSN 0357-2994 Coastal fi sh – a combination of freshwater and marine species Coastal fish communities are important components of Baltic Sea ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Pike Esox Lucius ILLINOIS RANGE
    northern pike Esox lucius Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The northern pike's average life span is eight to 10 Class: Osteichthyes years. The average weight is two pounds. It may Order: Esociformes attain a maximum length of 53 inches. The fins are rounded, and all except the pectoral fins have dark Family: Esocidae spots. Scales are present on the cheek and half of ILLINOIS STATUS the gill cover. The eyes are yellow. The long, green body has yellow spots on the sides. The belly is common, native white to dark yellow. The duckbill-shaped snout is easily seen. BEHAVIORS The northern pike lives in lakes, rivers and marshes. It prefers water without strong currents and with many plants. This fish reaches maturity at age two to three years. Spawning occurs in March. The female deposits up to 150,000 eggs that are scattered in marshy areas or other shallow water areas. Eggs hatch in 12-14 days. This fish eats fishes, insects, crayfish, frogs and reptiles. ILLINOIS RANGE © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. close up of head close up of side © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Engbretson Underwater Photography adult Aquatic Habitats lakes, ponds and reservoirs; rivers and streams; marshes Woodland Habitats none Prairie and Edge Habitats none © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources..
    [Show full text]
  • Esox Lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Ryan Hagerty/USFWS. Public Domain – Government Work. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/26990/rec/22. (February 1, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Circumpolar in fresh water. North America: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from Labrador to Alaska and south to Pennsylvania and Nebraska, USA [Page and Burr 2011]. Eurasia: Caspian, Black, Baltic, White, Barents, Arctic, North and Aral Seas and Atlantic basins, southwest to Adour drainage; Mediterranean basin in Rhône drainage and northern Italy. Widely distributed in central Asia and Siberia easward [sic] to Anadyr drainage (Bering Sea basin). Historically absent from Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean France, central Italy, southern and western Greece, eastern Adriatic basin, Iceland, western Norway and northern Scotland.” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Esox lucius as native in Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Monaco, 1 Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States (including Alaska). From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Occurs in Erqishi river and Ulungur lake [in China].” “Known from the Selenge drainage [in Mongolia] [Kottelat 2006].” “[In Turkey:] Known from the European Black Sea watersheds, Anatolian Black Sea watersheds, Central and Western Anatolian lake watersheds, and Gulf watersheds (Firat Nehri, Dicle Nehri).
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Angling Catch of Northern Pike (Esox Lucius) As
    Fisheries Research 186 (2017) 648–657 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres Full length article Determinants of angling catch of northern pike (Esox lucius) as revealed by a controlled whole-lake catch-and-release angling experiment—The role of abiotic and biotic factors, spatial encounters and lure type a,b,∗ a,c a a,d Robert Arlinghaus , Josep Alós , Tonio Pieterek , Thomas Klefoth a Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany b Division of Integrative Fisheries Management, Faculty of Life Sciences & Integrative Research Institute for the Transformation of Human-Environment Systems (IRI THESys), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany c Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), C/Miquel Marqués 21, 07190, Esporles, Illes Balears, Spain d Angling Association of Lower Saxony (Anglerverband Niedersachsen e.V.), Bürgermeister-Stümpel-Weg 1, 30457 Hannover, Germany a r a t i b s c l e i n f o t r a c t Article history: Studies on catches of anglers usually rely on observational data and are thus uncontrolled with respect Received 10 November 2015 to angler skill, bait/lure choice and site choice. We performed a controlled fishing experiment targeting Received in revised form 8 August 2016 northern pike (Esox lucius) in a small (25 ha), weakly eutrophic natural lake situated about 80 km northeast Accepted 10 September 2016 of Berlin (Germany) to understand abiotic, biotic and gear-related factors that relate to catch rates and size Handled by George A.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • Population Characteristics of Walleye, Northern Pike, Largemouth Bass, and Bluegill In
    Population characteristics of walleye, northern pike, largemouth bass, and bluegill in Long and Mud Lakes, Washburn County, Wisconsin, 2009. WBIC 2106800 (Long) and 2107700 (Mud) Kent Bass Fisheries Technician, Advanced Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Northern Region - Spooner February, 2012 1 Executive Summary Long Lake was sampled in 2009 to determine population abundance, growth, and size distribution of walleye. Largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, northern pike, and panfish were also collected. Relative abundance, size distribution, and growth were assessed for selected species. Mud Lake was also sampled for northern pike. A total of 2,240 walleyes were collected by fyke nets and electrofishing during the spawning period in Long Lake. Adult population abundance was estimated to be 6,915 fish or 2.1 fish/ acre, a 40% increase in adult abundance since 2001. A large 2005 year class accounted for much of the increase. Abundance of walleyes < 20 in was greater in 2009 than it was in either of the two previous surveys, while abundance of larger walleyes was lower. Walleye growth rates continued to be good and remained better than state and regional averages. Fall electrofishing captured only 1.2 young-of-the-year (YOY) walleyes per mile of shoreline sampled. A total of 261 northern pike were captured by fyke nets in Long and Mud Lakes. Mean length of the sample was 19.7 in, and size structure was comparable to what was found in the 1994 and 2001 surveys. Growth rates of northern pike improved since 2001 and were better than state and regional averages. A total of 270 largemouth bass were collected during May electrofishing, averaging 12.1 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa Fishing Regulations
    www.iowadnr.gov/fishing 1 Contents What’s New? Be a Responsible Angler .....................................3 • Mississippi River walleye length limit License & Permit Requirements ..........................3 changes - length limits in Mississippi Threatened & Endangered Species ....................4 River Pools 12-20 now include the entire Health Benefits of Eating Fish .............................4 Mississippi River in Iowa (p. 12). General Fishing Regulations ...............................5 • Missouri River paddlefish season start Fishing Seasons & Limits ....................................9 date changed to Feb. 1 (p. 11) Fish Identification...............................................14 • Virtual fishing tournaments added to License Agreements with Bordering States .......16 Iowa DNR special events applications Health Advisories for Eating Fish.......................17 - the definition of fishing tournaments now Aquatic Invasive Species...................................18 includes virtual fishing tournaments (p. 6) Fisheries Offices Phone Numbers .....................20 First Fish & Master Angler Awards ....................21 Conservation Officers Phone Numbers .............23 License and Permit Fees License/Permit Resident Nonresident On Sale Dec. 15, 2020 On Sale Jan. 1, 2021 Annual 16 years old and older $22.00 $48.00 3-Year $62.00 Not Available 7-Day $15.50 $37.50 3-Day Not Available $20.50 1-Day $10.50 $12.00 Annual Third Line Fishing Permit $14.00 $14.00 Trout Fee $14.50 $17.50 Lifetime (65 years old and older) $61.50 Not Available Boundary Water Sport Trotline $26.00 $49.50 Fishing Tournament Permit $25.00 $25.00 Fishing, Hunting, Habitat Fee Combo $55.00 Not Available Paddlefish Fishing License & Tag $25.50 $49.00 Give your kids a lifetime of BIG memories The COVID-19 pandemic ignited Iowans’ pent-up passion to get out and enjoy the outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavior of Fish Predators and Their Prey: Habitat Choice Between Open Water and Dense Vegetation
    Environmental Biology of Fishes, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1989, pp. 287-293. ISSN: 0378-1909 DOI: 10.1007/BF00001402 http://www.springerlink.com/ http://www.springerlink.com/content/v50w739260228h27/fulltext.pdf © Springer. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation Jacqueline F. Savino & Roy A. Stein Ohio Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit2, Department of Zoology, The Ohio State University. 2 The unit is sponsored jointly by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, and the Wildlife Management Institute Synopsis Behavior of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, and northern pike, Esox lucius, foraging on fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, or bluegills, Lepomis macrochirus, was quantified in pools with 50% cover (half the pool had artificial stems at a density of 1000 stems n-2). Both predators spent most of their time in the vegetation. Largemouth bass searched for bluegills and ambushed minnows, whereas the relatively immobile northern pike ambushed all prey. Minnows were closer to predators and were captured more frequently than bluegills. Even when minnows dispersed, they moved continually and eventually wandered within striking distance of a predator. Bluegills dispersed in the cover with predators. Bass captured the few bluegills that strayed into the open and pike captured those that approached too closely in the cover. The ability of predators to capture prey while residing in habitats containing patches of dense cover may explain their residence in areas often considered to be poor ones for foraging.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Temagami Times Fall
    Volume 40 • Number 2 • CirCulatioN 1,500 A FREE PUBLICATION T T THE VOICE OF THE TEMAGAMI LAKES ASSOCIATION (TLA) FALL 2010 Major Municipal Election “TESTING THE WATERS” Issues and Where the By Ted Tichinoff TLA Board Stands The Board of the TLA has decided to undertake an independent water While the TLA will not endorse testing program for Lake Temagami. any candidates in this year’s Municipal Testing the lake water will allow the election, the Association’s Board of formation of a base line point. Con- Directors has discussed at length what tinued testing over time will allow it believes are the major issues in us to monitor and identify trends of facing voters. They are: concerns. If there are troubling trends • The economic survival of our we can take steps to remedy the situ- community ation. • Development issues If, for example, testing shows that • Taxation issues some areas of the lake have high phos- • User fees phorus levels, this can be the basis to • Cooperation within our community motivate cottagers to be active in com- • Water quality on all municipal bating phosphorus overloading: not bodies of water washing anything in the lake, ensuring • Municipal planning policies septic systems are functioning, not us- ing fertilizers for lawns or gardens and Furthermore, here are positions taken preserving natural shorelines. by the TLA Board of Directors that will As well, it’s important to have solid The end of a beautiful day on Amphibolite Bay … soon to be followed by another. influence their personal support of any data about the lake, obtained and ana- Photo by: Katelyn (posted on The Weather Network) candidates in this election: lyzed in accordance with the highest 1.
    [Show full text]