Aircraft Accident Report, World Airways, Inc., DC-8-63F, N802WA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aircraft Accident Report, World Airways, Inc., DC-8-63F, N802WA File No. 1-0018 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT WORLD AIRWAYS, INC. OC-8-63F, N802WA KING COVE, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 8, 1973 Adopted: May 8, 1974 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D.C. 20591 Report Number: NTSB-AAR-74-6 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE . Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipientls Catalog No. NTSB-AAR-74-6 I. Titie and Subtitle Aircraft Accident Report- 5.Report Date World Airways, Inc., DC-8-63F, N802WA May 8, 1974 King Cove, Alaska, September 8, 1973 6.Performing Organization Code '. Author(s) 8.Performing Organization Report No. i SY I. Performing Organization Name and Address i0.Work Unit No. 1. In 1281 1.1 Hi National Transportation Safety Board 11 .Contract or Grant No. 1.2 In Bureau of Aviation Safety 1.3 Da Washington, D. C. 20591 13.Type of Report and 1.4 Ot Period Covered 1.5 CI 2.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Reoort 1.6 Ai September 8, 1973 1.7 MC NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD 1.8 A! CI Washington, D. C. 20591 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 1.9 1.10 AI 1.11 F' 15.Suppiementary Notes ,.1.12 A: 1.13 M This report contains Safety Recornendation A-74-53. 1.14 F 1.15 S 16.Abstract 1.16 T 1.17 0 8, About 0542 Alaska daylight time on September 1973, World Airways, Inc., 2. A Flight 802, a DC-8-63F, crashed into Mt. Dutton, near King Cove, Alaska. The six A occupants--three crewmembers and three nonrevenue company employees--were killed. 2.1 The aircraft was destroyed by impact and fire. 2.2 C Flight 802 was a Military Airlift Comnand contract cargo flight from Travis AFB,, I California, to Clark AFB, Philippine Republic, with intermediate stops at Cold Bay, 3. I Alaska, and Yokota AFB, Japan. It was cleared for an approach 125 miles east of 1 the Cold Bay Airport. The flight reported that it was leaving 31,000 feet: this 1 was Flight 802's last recorded transmission. The aircraft crashed at the 3,500-foot level of Mt. Dutton, approximately 15.5 miles east of the airport. ~ The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the accident was the captain's deviation from approved instrument approach proce- ~ dures. As a result of the deviation, the flight descended into an area of unrelia- ~ ble navigation signals and obstructing terrain. 17.Key Words i8.Distribution Statement i Aircraft accident, non-precision approach, back course This report is available to i approach, non-compliance with approved instrument the'public through the l approach prooedures, minimum sector altitudes, National Technical Informa- operation in area of signal unreliability. tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22151 i9.Security Classification 20.Security Classification 21.No. of Pages 22.Price ~ (of this report) (of this page) 30 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED WSB Fom 1765.2 (11/70) ii .PP 40 . on TABLE OF CONTENTS . on . Synopsis ..................... 1 1 . Investigation ................... 1 . 1.1 History of the Flight ............... 1 1.2 Injuries to Persons ................ 3 . 1.3 Damage to Aircraft ................ 3 1.4 Other Damage ................... 4 1.5 Crew Information ................. 4 1.6 Aircraft Information ............... 4 1.7 Meteorological Information ............ 4 1.8 Aids to Navigation ................ 5 LF 1.9 Conrmunications .................. 6 1.10 Aerodrome and Ground Facilities .......... 6 . 1.11 Flight Recorders ................. 6 .a. 12 Aircraft Wreckage ................. 6 1.13 Medical and Pathologjcal Examination ....... 8 1.14 Fire ........................ 8 . 1.15 Survival Aspects ................. 8 1.16 Test and Research ................. 8 * 1.17 Other Information ................. 8 2 . Analysis and Conclusions ............. 8 2.1 Analysis ..................... 8 2.2 Conclusions .................... 11 (a) Findings ................... 11 FB @) Probable Cause ................ 11 Y, 3 . Recomendations .................. 12 Appendices Appendix A Invastigation and Hearing .... 13 Appendix B Crew Information ......... 14 Appendix C Aircraft Information ....... 15 Appendix D Flight Track ........... 17 Appendix E Transcript of Cockpit Voice 1- Recording ........... 19 Appendix F Approach Plate for Cold Bay Airport ............ 26 . Appendix ( Reconmendation .......... 27 0 . 1 iii I File No. 1-0018 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C. 20591 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT Adopted: May 8, 1974 WORLD AIRWAYS, INC. DC-8-63F, N802WA KING COVE, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 8, 1973 SYNOPSIS About 0542 Alaska daylight time on September 8, 1973, World Airways, Inc., Flight 802, a DC-8-63F, (N802WA), crashed into Mt. Dutton, near King Cove, Alaska. The six occupants--three crewmembers and three non- revenue company employees-were killed. The aircraft was destroyed by impact and fire. Flight 802 was a Military Airlift Comnd contract cargo flight from Travis AFB, California, to Clark AFB, Philippine Republic, with inter- mediate stops at Cold Bay, Alaska, and Yokota AFB, Japan. It was cleared for approach 125 miles east of the Cold Bay Airport. -The'last recorded transmission from the flight to the Cold Bay flight service station was that it was leaving 31,000 feet. The aircraft crashed at the 3,500-foot level of Mt. Dutton, about 15.5 miles east of the airport. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the accident was the captain's deviation from approved instrument approach procedures. As a result of the deviation, the flight descended into an area of unreliable navigation signals and obstructing terrain. As a result of this accident, the Safety Board has made recommendations to the Federal Aviation Administration. 1, INVESTIGATION 1.1 History of the Flight World Airways, Inc., Flight 802, a DC-8-63F, (N802WA) was a Military Airlift Command contract cargo flight from Travis AirForceBase (AFB), California, to Clark AFB, Philippine Republic, with intermediate stops at Cold Bay, Alaska, and Yokota AFB, Japan. .The crew reported to the World Airways dispatch office at Oakland International Airport, Oakland, California, at 2200 I-/. From there, they went by car to Travis AFB where they were briefed by U. S. Air Force weather personnel. The crew filed the following instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan: -1/ All times listed are Alaska daylight time, based on the 24-hour clock. -2- "william 1 Standard Instrument Department (SID), direct Ukiah, At 05: California, control 1486 to gateway Redwood, direct 43'N-130%, VORTAC ?/ 48°N-130%, direct 53'N-150%, direct 55'N-160%, direct Cold officer , '1 Bay, at flight level (FL) 310, true airspeed 480 knots, and In respons estimated time en route 4 hours 38 minutes." said, "I g first offi The proposed alternate airport, Anchorage, was later changed to King turn, the Salmon, Alaska. The flight was cleared as filed, except for achangeinSID. next minut impossible Flight 802 departed Travis AFB at 0111 and proceeded to the vicinity for a circ of its last en route fix, 55' N, 160' W, without incident. At that fix, proach he the crew was unable to contact the Anchorage Air Route Traffic Control rain they Center (ARTCC) and finally gave their position report to the Cold Bay At 0539, j Flight Service Station (FSS) at 0525. The distance from Cold Bay was little hi$ reported to be 125 distance measuring equipment @ME) miles, with an forty DME: estimated time of arrival of 0542. The Cold Bay FSS advised that the' weather was ". measured ceiling five hundred overcast, visibility At 01 seven, with some very light drizzle . winds are threezero zero degrees no reason at two four with peak gusts at three one . the ceilings are ragged 4,000 fee! and it's been holding pretty much that way all evening . .I, first off: changed t' At 0527 Flight 802 was cleared for an approach to the Cold Bay Air- seconds. port. Both transmissions were acknowledged. At 0529, the flight re- heading w ported it was leaving 31,000 feet (FL 310). This was the last recorded transmission from Flight 802. According to flight data recorder (FDR) Af te information, the flight descended continuously and leveled off at 3,500 radio alt feet 21. (See Appendix D.) "Twenty m One forty Although Flight 802 was not cleared for a specific approach to Cold hey John, Bay, the only approved approach procedure, in view of the weather and creased, operating limitations, was to use the localizer back course DME approach Six secor to runway 32. Two transitions are published for this approach: (1) Pro- feet, on ceed outbound on the localizer back course at 7,000 feet to the 19.5-mile DME fix, descend in a procedure turn to 3,500 feet on the west side of the 1.2 localizer, and return to the 19.5-mile DME fix. (2) Intercept the 40- x mile DME fix on the back course of the localizer and descend to 3,500 feet inbound on the localizer before the aircraft reaches the 19.5-mile DME fix. (See Appendix F.) FJ Nl According to the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) transcript, a few NI minutes after the flight started to descend and during a discussion about the anticipated wind and approach speed, the captain said, "thirty- 1.3 five hundred feet m.s.1.". (See Appendix E.) The crew subsequently com- x pleted the in-range checklist, discussed the minimum descent altitude The (MA), and began tuning the navigation receivers. There was no mention i of the specific instrument approach intended. I -3; COl -21 All altitudes and elevations are mean sea level. f re -3- At 0536, when the flight was about 35 nmi east of the Cold Bay VORTAC 3/ and near the 3,500-foot level, the captain asked the first officer, 'Where's your DME?" The first officer replied, "Not Good.'' In response to the captain's remark, "No DME, huh?" the first officer said, "I got thirty seven, we were forty out the last I saw." When the first officer asked the captain whether he was going to make a procedure turn, the captain replied, "No I .
Recommended publications
  • CFIT, World Airways, Inc., DC-8-63F, N802WA, King Cove, Alaska, September 8, 1973
    CFIT, World Airways, Inc., DC-8-63F, N802WA, King Cove, Alaska, September 8, 1973 Micro-summary: This DC-8-63F flew into mountainous terrain. Event Date: 1973-09-08 at 0542 ADT Investigative Body: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), USA Investigative Body's Web Site: http://www.ntsb.gov/ Cautions: 1. Accident reports can be and sometimes are revised. Be sure to consult the investigative agency for the latest version before basing anything significant on content (e.g., thesis, research, etc). 2. Readers are advised that each report is a glimpse of events at specific points in time. While broad themes permeate the causal events leading up to crashes, and we can learn from those, the specific regulatory and technological environments can and do change. Your company's flight operations manual is the final authority as to the safe operation of your aircraft! 3. Reports may or may not represent reality. Many many non-scientific factors go into an investigation, including the magnitude of the event, the experience of the investigator, the political climate, relationship with the regulatory authority, technological and recovery capabilities, etc. It is recommended that the reader review all reports analytically. Even a "bad" report can be a very useful launching point for learning. 4. Contact us before reproducing or redistributing a report from this anthology. Individual countries have very differing views on copyright! We can advise you on the steps to follow. Aircraft Accident Reports on DVD, Copyright © 2006 by Flight Simulation Systems, LLC All rights reserved. www.fss.aero File No. 1-0018 AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT WORLD AIRWAYS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 4910-13 DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/21/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-20567, and on govinfo.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49] RIN 2120-AA66 Proposed Technical Amendment to Separate Terminal Airspace Areas from Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L Offshore Airspace Areas; Alaska AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the following Offshore Airspace Areas in Alaska: Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L. The FAA found an error with the Offshore Airspace Legal Descriptions containing airspace descriptions not related to the need to apply IFR en route Air Traffic Control services in international airspace. This action would correct that error by removing terminal airspace, airspace associated with geographic coordinates, and airspace associated with NAVAIDs from the Offshore Airspace legal descriptions. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, D.C. 20590; telephone: 1(800) 647-5527, or (202) 366-9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • 363 Part 238—Contracts With
    Immigration and Naturalization Service, Justice § 238.3 (2) The country where the alien was mented on Form I±420. The contracts born; with transportation lines referred to in (3) The country where the alien has a section 238(c) of the Act shall be made residence; or by the Commissioner on behalf of the (4) Any country willing to accept the government and shall be documented alien. on Form I±426. The contracts with (c) Contiguous territory and adjacent transportation lines desiring their pas- islands. Any alien ordered excluded who sengers to be preinspected at places boarded an aircraft or vessel in foreign outside the United States shall be contiguous territory or in any adjacent made by the Commissioner on behalf of island shall be deported to such foreign the government and shall be docu- contiguous territory or adjacent island mented on Form I±425; except that con- if the alien is a native, citizen, subject, tracts for irregularly operated charter or national of such foreign contiguous flights may be entered into by the Ex- territory or adjacent island, or if the ecutive Associate Commissioner for alien has a residence in such foreign Operations or an Immigration Officer contiguous territory or adjacent is- designated by the Executive Associate land. Otherwise, the alien shall be de- Commissioner for Operations and hav- ported, in the first instance, to the ing jurisdiction over the location country in which is located the port at where the inspection will take place. which the alien embarked for such for- [57 FR 59907, Dec. 17, 1992] eign contiguous territory or adjacent island.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Major Commercial Airlines : Tequesta
    The Development of the Major Commercial Airlines in Dade County, Florida: 1945-1970 By AURORA E. DAVIS* The prosperity of Dade County is built in a large measure around tourism. In fact, tourism is Greater Miami's largest single source of in- come, as it contributed, by 1970, over 2.1 billion dollars a year to the area's economy. As one of the delivery and departure vehicles for tourists, air transportation, and particularly the commercial aviation industry, as- sumes a position of paramount importance carrying an estimated 60 to 65 per cent of tourists to South Florida. In addition, air transportation has become since World War II a dominant stimulant to the area's eco- nomic expansion. The industry's development and growth have helped provide the stable base for sharp rises in tourism, aviation-oriented enter- prises, and other institutional growth. This study of the development and consequent effect of air transpor- tation on the economy of Dade County and the South Florida area, because of the enormous extent of the subject, is limited to the commercial aviation industry. In particular, it will focus upon the four major airlines serving Miami: Pan American World Airways; Eastern Airlines; National Airlines; and Delta Air Lines. There are other large domestic and international carriers serving Miami, but none have had the local impact of what this author calls "Miami's big four." 1 The aviation history of Dade County can be said to have begun in 1911 when Howard Gill brought a Wright brothers aircraft to Miami. The appearance of this aircraft in July and subsequent favorable reaction on the part of local officials, augured a most beneficial relationship between *This paper is based upon a Master of Arts thesis in history written in 1972 at the Uni- versity of Miami.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco International Airport
    San Francisco International Airport 2 0 1 3 A NNU A L R EPO R T Fiscal Year 2012-2013 I am extremely proud of the ongoing accomplishments at SFO, the international gateway to San Francisco and the innovation capital of the world. Mayor Edwin M. Lee Table of Contents 3 Connecting the World 19 Cargo 5 United States of America 21 Awards & Recognition 9 Asia/Oceania 23 Building for the Future 11 Europe/Middle East 25 Letter from the Airport Director 13 Canada 27 Letter from the Commission President 15 Latin America 29 Financial Summary Airport Commission & Facts & Figures 17 37 Airport Management Malaspina Glacier, Alaska Connecting the World For more than 85 years, San Francisco International Airport (SFO) has been connecting people with places. With 40 airlines and 112 direct destinations, SFO continues to be one of the world’s major airports, ranking 7th in North America and 22nd in the world in 2012. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2012/13 (July through June), total passenger volume reached 44.7 million, a 3.9% increase from the prior year. Both measures established a new peak for SFO. United Airlines (UA) and Virgin America (VX) accounted for a majority of the domestic growth with over 600,000 additional domestic enplanements1, or 86% of the total domestic growth in the FY. UA introduced year-round non-stop service to Raleigh-Durham, NC and Ft. Lauderdale, FL. VX introduced year-round non-stop service to Washington D.C. Reagan National Airport; Newark, NJ and Austin, TX; and seasonal service to Palm Springs, CA and Anchorage, AK.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 212/Friday, October 31
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 64881 compliance with the requirements of National Archives and Records the airspace description revealed that it paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. Administration (NARA). For information on contained two items that were the availability of this material at NARA, call FAA AD Differences unnecessary. The Norton Sound Low (202) 741–6030, or go to: http:// _ 1,200 foot description for Selawik, AK, Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ www.archives.gov/federal register/ is not required. Similarly, the 1,200 ft. or service information as follows: No code_of_federal_regulations/ differences. ibr_locations.html. description for Control 1234L had duplicate references to Eareckson Air Other FAA AD Provisions Issued in Renton, Washington, on October Force Station. These two items are 9, 2008. (g) The following provisions also apply to addressed in the airspace descriptions Ali Bahrami, this AD: below. With the exception of editorial (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, changes, this amendment is the same as (AMOCs): The Manager, International Aircraft Certification Service. that proposed in the NPRM. Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane [FR Doc. E8–25307 Filed 10–30–08; 8:45 am] These airspace areas are published in Directorate, FAA, has the authority to BILLING CODE 4910–13–P paragraph 6007 of FAA Order 7400.9R, approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested signed August 15, 2007, and effective using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. September 15, 2007, which is Send information to ATTN: Shahram DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Year Project Listing by House District
    Two Year Project Listing by House District FY2010 FY2011 Unrestricted Designated Other Federal Unrestricted Designated Other Federal HD Dept Project Title GF Amount GF Amount Amount Amount Total GF Amount GF Amount Amount Amount Total Ketchikan (HD 1) Trans Coffman Cove - Wander Around Town Trail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 450,000 Trans Coffman Cove Maintenance Station 900,000 0 0 0 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Historic Ketchikan, Inc. - Historic Clover Pass School Project 0 0 0 0 0 31,100 0 0 0 31,100 Commerce Hollis - Emergency Services Facility Construction 400,000 0 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 EnvCon Ketchikan - Baranof Reservoir Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 1,968,330 0 0 0 1,968,330 Commerce Ketchikan - Bethe Substation Replacement 5,000,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan - Cruise Ship Berth IV Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,000 0 1,300,000 Commerce Ketchikan - Fire Station No. 1 Replacement Project 5,000,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan - Replace Cruise Ship Berths I and II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 Trans Ketchikan - Replacement and Rehabilitation of Municipal Bridges and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 Trestles Commerce Ketchikan - Whitman Lake Hydro Project 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan Area Arts & Humanities Council, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 127/Friday, July 2, 2010/Rules And
    38408 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Adak Airport, AK, extending clockwise from each side of the 360° bearing from the Dutch between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday the 033° bearing to the 081° bearing from the Harbor NDB, AK, extending from the 6.4-mile through Friday, except Federal holidays. Mount Moffett NDB, AK, and within a 10- radius of Unalaska Airport, AK, to 9.5 miles FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: mile radius of Atka Airport, AK, and within north of Unalaska Airport, AK; and that If a 10.6-mile radius from Cold Bay Airport, airspace extending upward from the surface you have questions on this temporary AK, and within 9 miles east and 4.3 miles within a 4.6-mile radius of Cold Bay Airport, rule, call or e-mail LTJG Eunice James, west of the 321° bearing from Cold Bay AK, and within 1.7 miles each side of the Sector New York Waterways Airport, AK, extending from the 10.6-mile 150° bearing from Cold Bay Airport, AK, Management Division, Marine Events radius to 20 miles northwest of Cold Bay extending from the 4.6-mile radius to 7.7 Branch. Coast Guard; telephone (718) Airport, AK, and 4 miles each side of the miles southeast of Cold Bay Airport, AK, and ° 354–4163, e-mail 070 bearing from Cold Bay Airport, AK, within 3 miles west and 4 miles east of the [email protected]. If you have extending from the 10.6-mile radius to 13.6 ° 335 bearing from Cold Bay Airport, AK, questions on viewing the docket, call miles northeast of Cold Bay Airport, AK, and extending from the 4.6-mile radius to 12.2 within a 26.2-mile radius of Eareckson Air miles northwest of Cold Bay Airport, AK.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcement
    Contact: Lorie Dankers TSA Public Affairs (206) 743-1497 [email protected] PRESS RELEASE @TSA_Pacific FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 9, 2021 TSA seeks to hire more than 170 airport security screening officers across Alaska TSA paying recruitment incentive of $1,000 to each newly-hired TSO in Alaska ANCHORAGE, Alaska - The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has launched a recruitment effort to hire more than 170 Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) in Alaska before summer 2021. Full- and part-time positions are available at 14 airports statewide. At Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport, TSA is looking to hire 83 full- and part-time TSOs. At Fairbanks International Airport, TSA is hiring 13 TSOs and at Juneau International Airport, TSA is hiring 10. TSA is also hiring at Adak Airport; Bethel Airport; Cold Bay Airport; Dillingham Airport; Ketchikan International Airport; King Salmon Airport; Kodiak Airport; Merle K. (Mudhole) Smith Airport in Cordova; Nome Airport; Sitka Rocky Gutierrez Airport; and Wiley Post- Will Rogers Memorial Airport in Utqiagvik. As an incentive, TSA will pay newly hired TSOs $500 upon starting with the agency and $500 after one year of service with TSA. To qualify for the recruitment incentive, the employee must come onboard with TSA between March 14 and June 30, 2021. “TSOs are the backbone of our security operations, carrying out the essential mission of protecting the nation’s commercial air transportation system” said TSA Federal Security Director for Alaska Peter Duffy. “TSA Alaska is seeking motivated individuals at airports statewide to join our team. Now is the time to begin your federal career with TSA.” TSA is currently Benefits include paid training, annual and sick leave, health care plans for full- and part-time employees and a generous retirement plan.
    [Show full text]