Stinging Caterpillars 3 in Three Words I Can Sum up Everything I’Ve Learned About Life: It Goes On
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lesions After Sting
Saddleback Caterpillar Forest Huval, D. Ring, T.E. Reagan, Dale K.Pollet Description The saddleback caterpillar (Acharia stimulea) is a sluglike caterpillar that has a bright brown spot in the middle of a green saddle-shaped area on its back. It has four prominent horns on each end of the body that hold potent hemolytic venom. The caterpillars can grow up to 1 inch (2.54 cm) when mature. Saddlebacks are solitary feeders and can be found on a variety of foliage, including apple, basswood, cherry, chestnut, dogwood, elm, maple, oak, plum and even corn. The saddleback caterpillar is found across the eastern United States, ranging from Florida to New York, and as far westward as Texas, Indiana and Kansas. Sting Reactions Saddlebacks are venomous and are among the most common stinging caterpillars in North America. The saddleback sting is immediately painful, with radiation from the site of the sting to the local lymphatic group. Without blistering, symptoms usually subside within two to eight hours. Symptoms, including migraines, gastrointestinal issues and asthma, can last for five hours. A sting may leave red blotches on the site. Allergies to these stings have been documented, and stings should be watched for any potential anaphylactic reaction. Management of Stings TOP: Saddleback caterpillar, John A. Weidhass, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Bugwood.org To relieve pain, antihistamines should be taken and a BOTTOM: Adult saddleback moth, Lacy L. Hyche, Auburn cold compress applied. Remove urticating hairs and spines University, Bugwood.org using adhesive tape. Wash the stung area with soap and water or a sterilizing agent and allow to air dry. -
First Record of Citheronia Regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) Feeding on Cotinus Obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Author(S): Gary R
First Record of Citheronia regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) Feeding on Cotinus obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Author(s): Gary R. Graves Source: Florida Entomologist, 100(2):474-475. Published By: Florida Entomological Society https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0210 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1653/024.100.0210 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Scientific Notes First record of Citheronia regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) feeding on Cotinus obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Gary R. Graves1,2,* The regal moth (Citheronia regalis F.; Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) 2016) shows historic and recent records of C. regalis for only 11 of was historically distributed in eastern North America from southern the 34 counties in which natural populations of smoketree have been New England and southern Michigan, south to southern Florida, and documented (Davis & Graves 2016). west to eastern Nebraska and eastern Texas (Tuskes et al. -
(Larva), Regal Moth Or Royal Walnut Moth (Adult), Citheronia Regalis (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Ceratocampinae)1 Donald W
EENY-052 Hickory Horned Devil (Larva), Regal Moth or Royal Walnut Moth (Adult), Citheronia regalis (Fabricius) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Ceratocampinae)1 Donald W. Hall2 The Featured Creatures collection provides in-depth profiles of insects, nematodes, arachnids, and other organisms relevant to Florida. These profiles are intended for the use of interested laypersons with some knowledge of biology as well as academic audiences. Introduction The regal or royal walnut moth, Citheronia regalis (Fabri- cius), is one of our largest and most spectacular moths. Like most other moths, it is nocturnal but is sometimes observed at lights. The imposing larva, known as the hickory horned devil, is most often observed when it is full grown and comes down from the trees to wander in search of a site for pupation. The regal moth is a beautiful and fascinating member of our native fauna, and its larvae should not be killed. If a larva is found crawling on pavement or in an area of thick turf grass where it would have difficulty burrowing, it should be moved to an area of soft soil or a mulched area where it can Figure 1. Hickory horned devil caterpillar, of the regal moth, Citheronia burrow for pupation. regalis (Fabricius), showing size in relation to an adult human’s hand. Credits: Lyle J. Buss, UF/IFAS 1. This document is EENY-052, one of a series of the Entomology and Nematology Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date August 1998. Revised September 2014 and February 2021. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication. -
ISSUE #38, Page 68...72 Pickering + State Coordinators
SOUTHERN LEPIDOPTERISTS’ NEWS VOLUME 38 NO.1 (2016), PG. 67 WHY FLY NOW? PUPA BANKS, APOSEMATISM, AND OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY EXPLAIN OBSERVED MOTH FLIGHT ACTIVITY BY JOHN PICKERING Abstract – This paper addresses factors that affect insect flight activity. It presents a 5-year time series of nightly activity at a site in Clarke County, Georgia for Epimecis hortaria, Tulip-tree Beauty (Geometridae: Ennominae)p Nigetia formosalis, Thin-winged Owlet (Erebidae: Scolecocampinae), and Dryocampa rubicunda, Rosy Maple Moth (Saturniidae: Ceratocampinae). These species exemplify three seasonal flight patterns, here defined as diffuse, synchronized, and complex. I propose that diffuse flight patterns are typical of many cryptic species and that synchronized ones are typical of aposematic species and species restricted by the phenology of their hosts. The complex pattern of D. rubicunda shows variation in when individuals broke pupal diapause and eclosed. Because some insects have pupa banks, similar to seed banks in plants, their observed flights and generations may be decoupled. I caution against using terms such as brood, generation, or voltinism to describe observed seasonal adult activity. Instead, I propose that we use the term flight to describe their activity. _____________________________________ Introduction – Many biotic and abiotic factors interact to affect the seasonal flight activity of moths and our ability to sample them accurately (Tauber et al. 1986p Valtonen et al. 2011). They include processes fundamental to each species’ natural history and life cycle. By what means do they disperse, avoid natural enemies, find mates, lay eggs on or near hosts, avoid natural enemies, and in the grand scheme of things, survive for millions of years beyond the next mega-drought, warming period, and ice age? Science has barely begun to explore the complexity of these questions. -
Sti Gi G Caterpillars
f£.B 1 8 \tjf 1 (j L-1312 STI GI G CATERPILLARS Weldon H. Newton Former Extension Entomologist Texas residents frequently encounter a fuzzy or develop gradually over a period of a few weeks, spiny caterpillar which inflicts a painful "sting" upon shedding their skins at intervals to allow for growth contact. Reaction to the sting ranges from mild, with to about I-inch long when mature. Their color gradu local reddening, swelling and itching to rather severe, ally changes with each molt from whitish to tan to which occasionally requires hospital care for unusu grayish, with darker markings when mature. Inter ally sensitive persons. Hypersensitive persons may ex spersed among the long body hairs are numerous perience severe swelling, nausea and generalized sys short spines which discharge venom upon contact. temic reactions. When viewed from above, the puss caterpillar's head, true legs and abdominal prolegs are obscured beneath Several kinds of stinging caterpillars occur in the body. Texas, but the most common are the puss caterpillar (Megalopyge opercularis), the io moth (Automeris io), the saddleback caterpillar (Sibine stimulea), the buck moth (Hemileuca maia) and the hag moth (Phobetron pithecium). These caterpillars are the immature stages of various moths and do not have a "stinger" such as a wasp or bee. Instead, their venom is contained in glands which bear rather stiff, hollow spines through which it flows upon contact or break age of the spines. The caterpillars feed upon the foliage of many plants, including trees, shrubs and Figure 1. Drawing of puss caterpillar with enlarged flowers. -
Saddleback Caterpillar
Pest Profile Photo credit: Gerald J. Lenhard, Louisiana State University, Bugwood.org (Larva) Lacy L. Hyche, Auburn University, Bugwood.org (Adult) Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License Common Name: Saddleback Caterpillar Scientific Name: Acharia stimulea Order and Family: Lepidoptera; Limacodidae Size and Appearance: Length (mm) Appearance Egg Length: 1.5-2 mm - Laid on the upper side of host leaves in irregular Width: 1 mm clusters of 30-50 eggs - Transparent and yellow in color with thin edges Larva/Nymph - Have a slug-like body with a granulated texture - Prolegs are concealed under the ventral surface - Brightly colored, denoting toxicity - Dark brown on both ends with a contrasting bright green pattern on the dorsal midsection that is 1.2-20 mm outlined in white, giving it the appearance of a saddle - Have large fleshy tubercles covered in long setae and spines that extend from both ends - Have three cream colored spots on the posterior end that imitate a large face Adult - Glossy dark brown with black shading - Have dense scales on body and wings, giving it a “furry” appearance Wingspan: 26-43 mm - Have a single white dot near the base of the forewing with 1-3 additional white dots near the apex - Hindwings are a light brown Pupa (if applicable) ~10 mm - A hard, silken cocoon Type of feeder (Chewing, sucking, etc.): Larvae have chewing mouthparts while adults have siphoning mouthparts. Host plant/s: Maple tree, Hackberry, pecan, spicebush, crape myrtle, chestnut tree Description of Damage: Caterpillars feed on plant leaves but most of their damage comes from unintentional contact with humans. -
First Record of Citheronia Regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) Feeding on Cotinus Obovatus (Anacardiaceae)
First record of Citheronia regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) feeding on Cotinus obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Graves, Gary R. Published in: Florida Entomologist DOI: 10.1653/024.100.0210 Publication date: 2017 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY-NC Citation for published version (APA): Graves, G. R. (2017). First record of Citheronia regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) feeding on Cotinus obovatus (Anacardiaceae). Florida Entomologist, 100(2), 474-475. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0210 Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 Scientific Notes First record of Citheronia regalis (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) feeding on Cotinus obovatus (Anacardiaceae) Gary R. Graves1,2,* The regal moth (Citheronia regalis F.; Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) 2016) shows historic and recent records of C. regalis for only 11 of was historically distributed in eastern North America from southern the 34 counties in which natural populations of smoketree have been New England and southern Michigan, south to southern Florida, and documented (Davis & Graves 2016). west to eastern Nebraska and eastern Texas (Tuskes et al. 1996; Lotts The proposed introduction of biocontrol agents to counter the & Naberhaus 2016). Populations in New England apparently have been invasive Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi; Anacar- extirpated (Tuskes et al. 1996; Wagner 2012). The polyphageous lar- diaceae) in Florida (Medal et al. 1999; Manrique et al. 2008; Diaz et vae, commonly known as the hickory horned devil, are most often en- al. 2015) substantially raises the conservation stakes for the distantly countered on host plants in the Juglandaceae—hickories (Carya spp.), related American smoketree (Miller et al. 2001) because no arthro- pecan (Carya illinoinensis [Wangenh.] K. -
Saddleback Caterpillar Acharia Stimulea (Clemens) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Limacodidae)1 Christopher S
EENY-522 Saddleback Caterpillar Acharia stimulea (Clemens) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Limacodidae)1 Christopher S. Bibbs and J. Howard Frank2 Introduction Acharia stimulea (Clemens) is a limacodid moth, or slug moth, best known for its larval growth phase. Distinct bright color patterns and the presence of venomous, urticating spines lead to its recognition as the saddleback caterpillar. It is native to a large range in the eastern United States and able to feed on a wide array of host plant species. This species can survive well in northern temperate areas and warmer southern climates. The saddleback caterpillar is encountered most frequently as a medically significant pest, and has minor effects in landscaping and agriculture. Synonymys Empretia stimulea Clemens Limacodes ephippiatus Harris Figure 1. Mature larvae of the saddleback caterpillar, Acharia stimulea Sibine stimulea (Clemens) (Clemens). Credits: Lyle J. Buss, University of Florida Acharia stimulea (Clemens) Distribution (Dyar and Morton 1896) Acharia stimulea has a wide range in the eastern United States, occurring as far southward as Florida, northward to New York and Massachusetts, and westward to Texas, Indiana, and Kansas (Snow 1875; Darlington 1952; Nie- senbaum 1992; Landau and Prowell 1999; Heppner 2003; Covell 2005; Wagner 2005). 1. This document is EENY-522, one of a series of the Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date March 2012. Revised January 2015. Reviewed April 2018. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. This document is also available on the Featured Creatures website at http://entnemdept.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures/. 2. Christopher S. Bibbs, student; and J. -
Io Moth (Automeris Io)
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH THE ENVIRONMENT What’s Eating You? Io Moth (Automeris io) Eric W. Hossler, MD; Dirk M. Elston, MD; David L. Wagner, PhD f the 7 species of Automeris moths (order, About 10 days after being deposited, minute 2- to Lepidoptera; family, Saturniidae) found in the 3-mm larvae emerge from the ova and feed gregari- O United States, Automeris io often is the most ously upon their host plant. Favorite foods of the Io common and familiar. Its range extends as far north caterpillars include azaleas, birch, blackberry, cherry, as Quebec, Ontario, and southern Manitoba, Canada; clover, cotton, currant, elm, hackberry, hibiscus, west to Utah, Colorado, Nebraska, and Texas; and mesquite, oak, pear, poplar, redbud, rose, sassafras, south to Florida, eastern Mexico, and Costa Rica.1-3 and willow.1,2,4 In addition, larvae frequently feed on Across much of its range, the moths and their lar- grasses such as corn or Bermuda grass.2,4 Io moths are vae are among the most common giant silk moths around in deciduous woodlands, forests, and fields; encountered by the public. In Louisiana, the closely along power line rights-of-way; and in orchards, related Automeris louisiana largely replaces the Io parks, and suburban yards.2,5 moth in coastal areas.2 The sexually dimorphic adults have a wingspan The Io moth has 4 life stages: egg, larva (or cat- of 2.0 to 3.5 in and are easily recognized by the pres- erpillar), pupa, and adult. Eclosion of Io moths from ence of prominent black to blue eyespots with white cocoons occurs during late morning or early evening. -
Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?
Impacts of Native and Non-native plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better than Non-natives? by Carl Scott Clem A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama December 12, 2015 Key Words: native plants, non-native plants, caterpillars, natural enemies, associational interactions, congeneric plants Copyright 2015 by Carl Scott Clem Approved by David Held, Chair, Associate Professor: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Ray, Research Fellow: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Debbie Folkerts, Assistant Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Robert Boyd, Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Abstract With continued suburban expansion in the southeastern United States, it is increasingly important to understand urbanization and its impacts on sustainability and natural ecosystems. Expansion of suburbia is often coupled with replacement of native plants by alien ornamental plants such as crepe myrtle, Bradford pear, and Japanese maple. Two projects were conducted for this thesis. The purpose of the first project (Chapter 2) was to conduct an analysis of existing larval Lepidoptera and Symphyta hostplant records in the southeastern United States, comparing their species richness on common native and alien woody plants. We found that, in most cases, native plants support more species of eruciform larvae compared to aliens. Alien congener plant species (those in the same genus as native species) supported more species of larvae than alien, non-congeners. Most of the larvae that feed on alien plants are generalist species. However, most of the specialist species feeding on alien plants use congeners of native plants, providing evidence of a spillover, or false spillover, effect. -
BUTTERFLY and MOTH (DK Eyewitness Books)
EYEWITNESS Eyewitness BUTTERFLY & MOTH BUTTERFLY & MOTH Eyewitness Butterfly & Moth Pyralid moth, Margaronia Smaller Wood Nymph butterfly, quadrimaculata ldeopsis gaura (China) (Indonesia) White satin moth caterpillar, Leucoma salicis (Europe & Asia) Noctuid moth, Eyed Hawkmoth Diphthera caterpillar, hieroglyphica Smerinthus ocellata (Central (Europe & Asia) America) Madagascan Moon Moth, Argema mittrei (Madagascar) Thyridid moth, Rhondoneura limatula (Madagascar) Red Glider butterfly, Cymothoe coccinata (Africa) Lasiocampid moth, Gloveria gargemella (North America) Tailed jay butterfly, Graphium agamemnon, (Asia & Australia) Jersey Tiger moth, Euplagia quadripunctaria (Europe & Asia) Arctiid moth, Composia credula (North & South America) Noctuid moth, Noctuid moth, Mazuca strigitincta Apsarasa radians (Africa) (India & Indonesia) Eyewitness Butterfly & Moth Written by PAUL WHALLEY Tiger Pierid butterfly, Birdwing butterfly, Dismorphia Troides hypolitus amphione (Indonesia) (Central & South America) Noctuid moth, Baorisa hieroglyphica (India & Southeast Asia) Hairstreak butterfly, Kentish Glory moth, Theritas coronata Endromis versicolora (South America) (Europe) DK Publishing, Inc. Peacock butterfly, Inachis io (Europe and Asia) LONDON, NEW YORK, MELBOURNE, MUNICH, and DELHI Project editor Michele Byam Managing art editor Jane Owen Special photography Colin Keates (Natural History Museum, London), Kim Taylor, and Dave King Editorial consultants Paul Whalley and the staff of the Natural History Museum Swallowtail butterfly This Eyewitness -
Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park
Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park APPROVED Unit Management Plan STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Division of Recreation and Parks October 11, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK.....................................................1 Park Significance ...........................................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN......................................................................2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................................8 Management Authority and Responsibility..............................................................8 Park Management Goals ..............................................................................................8 Management Coordination..........................................................................................9 Public Participation.......................................................................................................9 Other Designations......................................................................................................10 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................11 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT.................................................12 Natural Resources.......................................................................................................12