DOCSLIB.ORG

WHITE PAPER on RESISTANCE in LEPIDOPTERAN PESTS of BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS (Bt) PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS in the UNITED STATES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WHITE PAPER on RESISTANCE in LEPIDOPTERAN PESTS of BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS (Bt) PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS in the UNITED STATES Environmental Protection Agency WHITE PAPER ON RESISTANCE IN LEPIDOPTERAN PESTS OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS (Bt) PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS IN THE UNITED STATES April 11, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ......................................................................................................................................... 8 I. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 A. PEST OF BT CORN AND BT COTTON ............................................................................................................................. 8 B. CURRENT IRM STRATEGIES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR BT CORN AND COTTON ........................................................ 10 C. CURRENTLY REGISTERED BT CORN PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS FOR LEPIDOPTERAN PESTS .................. 12 D. CURRENTLY REGISTERED BT COTTON PIPS FOR LEPIDOPTERAN PESTS ................................................................... 13 E. CURRENT RESISTANCE MONITORING AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES FOR BT CORN AND COTTON ........................... 14 1. Bt Corn – Resistance Monitoring and Mitigation ................................................................................................. 14 a. Bt Corn – Annual Population Sampling and Bioassays .......................................................................................................15 b. Bt Corn – Investigation of Reports of Unexpected Damage ................................................................................................17 c. Bt Corn – Resistance Mitigation ..........................................................................................................................................17 2. Bt Cotton – Resistance Monitoring and Mitigation .............................................................................................. 19 a. Bt Cotton – Annual Population Sampling and Bioassays ....................................................................................................19 b. Bt Cotton – Investigation of Reports of Unexpected Damage .............................................................................................19 c. Bt Cotton – Resistance Determination Criteria ....................................................................................................................20 d. Bt Cotton - Mitigation ..........................................................................................................................................................20 II. PROBLEM FORMULATION .............................................................................................................................. 20 A. CASES OF LEPIDOPTERAN RESISTANCE IN THE US .................................................................................................... 21 B. CAUSAL FACTORS OF RESISTANCE ........................................................................................................................... 21 1. All Bt toxins are non-high dose for H. zea and expedite resistance development ................................................. 21 2. Bt toxins expressed in both corn and cotton exert continuous selection pressure on some pests ......................... 21 3. Mosaic of single and pyramided traits undercuts pyramid durability .................................................................. 22 4. Use of seed blends in the southern US expedite resistance in ear-feeding pests of corn ...................................... 22 5. Refuge non-compliance undercuts durability of pyramids ................................................................................... 22 6. Methodology for sampling insects and diet bioassays delays resistance detection .............................................. 22 7. Lack of regulatory triggers for unexpected injury delays reporting of putative resistance .................................. 23 8. Current definition of resistance delays mitigation actions ................................................................................... 23 9. Cross-resistance between Bt toxins reduces durability of pyramids ..................................................................... 23 10. Non-functional pyramids lead to faster resistance development ...................................................................... 23 11. Mitigation of resistance occurs too late ........................................................................................................... 23 12. S. albicosta resistance to Bt corn ..................................................................................................................... 24 a. Limited availability of Cry-toxins reduce longevity of Vip3A technology ..........................................................................24 b. Low amount of refuge for single Bt trait reduces its durability ............................................................................................24 c. Seed blends and risk resistance ............................................................................................................................................24 III. SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTIES WITH IRM FOR LEPIDOPTERA PESTS AND POTENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO IRM STRATEGIES FOR BT CROPS ........................................................................ 24 A. LEPIDOPTERAN RESISTANCE REPORTS IN THE CONTINENTAL US ............................................................................. 24 1. H. zea resistance and field failure reports ............................................................................................................ 25 2. D. grandiosella resistance reports ........................................................................................................................ 27 3. S. frugiperda resistance reports ............................................................................................................................ 28 4. S. albicosta resistance reports .............................................................................................................................. 29 B. CAUSAL FACTORS OF RESISTANCE ........................................................................................................................... 31 1. Non-high dose traits and risk of faster resistance development ........................................................................... 31 2. Toxins expressed in corn and cotton exert continuous selection pressure ............................................................ 32 2 3. Mosaic of single and pyramided products undercuts durability of pyramids ....................................................... 33 4. Seed blends in the southern US and faster resistance development in ear-feeding pests of corn ......................... 34 a. Mosaic of variable toxin expressions in kernels ...................................................................................................................34 b. Pollination pathways, survival, and development: ...............................................................................................................35 c. Maternal Bt plants: ...............................................................................................................................................................35 i. Mosaic of kernels with variable Bt expression for a three-gene pyramid planted to pure stands ....................................36 ii. Mosaic of kernels with variable Bt expression for single trait products planted to pure stand ........................................37 d. Cross-pollination of refuge ears in RIBs: .............................................................................................................................37 5. Refuge non-compliance in the southern US undercuts durability of pyramids ..................................................... 39 6. Methodology for insect collections and diet bioassays delays resistance detection ............................................. 41 a. Current Resistance Monitoring and Mitigation Strategies for Bt Corn and Cotton ..............................................................41 b. Summary of H. zea Bioassay Results ...................................................................................................................................41 7. Lack of thresholds for unexpected injury delays reporting of putative resistance ................................................ 47 a. Lack of regulatory UXI thresholds .......................................................................................................................................47 b. Criteria for UXI thresholds ..................................................................................................................................................47 8. Current regulatory definition of resistance delays mitigation actions .................................................................. 49 9. Cross-resistance between Bt toxins reduces durability of pyramids ..................................................................... 50 10. Non-functional pyramids lead to faster resistance development .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bt Resistance Implications for Helicoverpa Zea (Lepidoptera
    Environmental Entomology, XX(X), 2018, 1–8 doi: 10.1093/ee/nvy142 Forum Forum Bt Resistance Implications for Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Insecticide Resistance Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ee/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ee/nvy142/5096937 by guest on 26 October 2018 Management in the United States Dominic D. Reisig1,3 and Ryan Kurtz2 1Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center, 207 Research Station Road, Plymouth, NC 27962, 2Agricultural & Environmental Research, Cotton Incorporated, 6399 Weston Parkway, Cary, NC 27513, and 3Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Subject Editor: Steven Naranjo Received 19 June 2018; Editorial decision 27 August 2018 Abstract Both maize and cotton genetically engineered to express Bt toxins are widely planted and important pest management tools in the United States. Recently, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has developed resistance to two toxin Bt maize and cotton (Cry1A and Cry2A). Hence, growers are transitioning to three toxin Bt cotton and maize that express both Cry toxins and the Vip3Aa toxin. H. zea susceptibility to Vip3Aa is threatened by 1) a lack of availability of non-Bt refuge crop hosts, including a 1–5% annual decline in the number of non-Bt maize hybrids being marketed; 2) the ineffectiveness of three toxin cultivars to function as pyramids in some regions, with resistance to two out of three toxins in the pyramid; and 3) the lack of a high dose Vip3Aa event in cotton and maize. We propose that data should be collected on current Cry-resistant H.
    [Show full text]
  • (Bacillus Thuringiensis) Maize
    Decomposition processes under Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize: Results of a multi-site experiment Jérôme Cortet, Mathias Andersen, Sandra Caul, Bryan Griffiths, Richard Joffre, Bernard Lacroix, Christophe Sausse, Jacqueline Thompson, Paul Krogh To cite this version: Jérôme Cortet, Mathias Andersen, Sandra Caul, Bryan Griffiths, Richard Joffre, et al.. Decomposition processes under Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize: Results of a multi-site experiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Elsevier, 2006, 38 (1), pp.195-199. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.025. hal-03218784 HAL Id: hal-03218784 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03218784 Submitted on 5 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Decomposition processes under Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) maize: Results of a multi-site experiment Je´roˆme Cortet, Mathias N. Andersen, Sandra Caul, Bryan Griffiths, Richard Joffre, Bernard Lacroix, Christophe Sausse, Jacqueline Thompson, Paul Henning Krogh correspondance: [email protected] Abstract The effects of maize expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab protein (Bt maize) on decomposition processes under three different European climatic conditions were assessed in the field. Farming practices using Bt maize were compared with conventional farming practices using near-isogenic non-Bt maize lines under realistic agricultural practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Fermentation of Bacillus Thuringiensis Var Israelensis
    STUDIES ON THE FERMENTATION OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS VAR ISRAELENSIS by DERMOT PEARSON School of Biological Sciences National Institute of Higher Education Du blin SuDmitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy June, 19ö5 COrfTENTS Section Page i INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PREFACE 2 1.2 BIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDES 4 1.2.1 Insect Classification 6 1.3 ORGANISMS USED IN BIOLOGICAL INSECTICIDES lU 1.3.1 Viruses in Insect Control 1U 1.3.2 Fungi in Insect Control 14 1.3.3. Nematodes in Insect Control 18 1.3.4 Protozoans in Insect Control - 2U 1.3.5 Bacteria in Insect Control 22 1.3.5.1 Bacillus popillae as a microbial insecticide 25 1.3.5.2 Bacillus sphaericus as a microbial insecticide 28 1.3.5.3. Bacillus thuringiensis as amicrooial insecticide 31 1.4 BACILLUS THURI1MGIENSIS 34 1.4.1 Bacteriology 34 1.4.2 Classification and Taxonomy 35 1.4.2.1 Tecnniques used in the taxonomy of B. thuringiensis, ana nomenclature recommendations . 36 1.4.2.2 SuD-groups of B. thuringiensis based on flagellar antigens 37 1.4.3 Toxins Produced by B. thuringiensis 38 1.4.3.1 Note on classification of toxins produced by bacteria 38 1.4.3.2 Alpha-exotoxin, phospholi pase C, lecithinase 4U 1.4.3.3 Beta-exotoxin or thuringiensin 40 1.4.3.4 Gamma-exotoxin 41 Section Page 1.4.3. b Parasporal crystal toxin 43 1.4.4 Genetics of B. thuringiensis 43 1.4.4.1 Plasmid analysis 43 1.4.4.2 Genetic transfer systems and crystal protein gene cloning 44 l .
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of Bacillus Thuringiensis Simulant Strains Suitable for Environmental Release
    ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY crossm Construction of Bacillus thuringiensis Simulant Strains Suitable for Downloaded from Environmental Release Sangjin Park,a,b Changhwan Kim,b Daesang Lee,b Dong Hyun Song,b Ki Cheol Cheon,b Hong Suk Lee,b Seong Joo Kim,b Jee Cheon Kim,b Sang Yup Leea,c,d Metabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Plus Program), Center for Systems and Synthetic Biotechnology, Institute for http://aem.asm.org/ the BioCentury, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Koreaa; The 5th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development (ADD), Daejeon, Republic of Koreab; BioProcess Engineering Research Center, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Koreac; BioInformatics Research Center, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Koread ABSTRACT For a surrogate bacterium to be used in outdoor studies, it is important to consider environmental and human safety and ease of detection. Recently, Bacil- Received 14 January 2017 Accepted 24 lus thuringiensis, a popular bioinsecticide bacterium, has been gaining attention as a February 2017 Accepted manuscript posted online 3 on July 22, 2018 by University of Queensland Library surrogate bacterium for use in biodefense. In this study, we constructed simulant March 2017 strains of B. thuringiensis with enhanced characteristics for environmental studies. Citation Park S, Kim C, Lee D, Song DH, Cheon Through transposon mutagenesis, pigment genes were inserted into the chromo- KC, Lee HS, Kim SJ, Kim JC, Lee SY. 2017. some, producing yellow-colored colonies for easy detection. To prevent persistence Construction of Bacillus thuringiensis simulant strains suitable for environmental release. Appl of spores in the environment, a genetic circuit was designed to produce a spore Environ Microbiol 83:e00126-17.
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Labour and Terminal Differentiation in a Novel Bacillus Thuringiensis Strain
    The ISME Journal (2015) 9, 286–296 & 2015 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/15 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Division of labour and terminal differentiation in a novel Bacillus thuringiensis strain Chao Deng1,2,3, Leyla Slamti2,3, Ben Raymond4, Guiming Liu5, Christelle Lemy2,3, Myriam Gominet6, Jingni Yang1, Hengliang Wang7, Qi Peng1, Jie Zhang1, Didier Lereclus2,3 and Fuping Song1 1State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China; 2INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, La Minie`re, 78280 Guyancourt, France; 3AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, F-78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France; 4Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot SL57PY, UK; 5CAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; 6Institut Pasteur, CNRS URA 2172, Unite´ de Biologie des Bacte´ries Pathoge`nes a` Gram positif, Paris, France and 7Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing, China A major challenge in bacterial developmental biology has been to understand the mechanisms underlying cell fate decisions. Some differentiated cell types display cooperative behaviour. Cooperation is one of the greatest mysteries of evolutionary biology and microbes have been considered as an excellent system for experimentally testing evolution theories. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a spore-forming bacterium, which is genetically closely related to B. anthracis, the agent of anthrax, and to B. cereus, an opportunistic human pathogen. The defining feature that distinguishes Bt from its relatives is its ability to produce crystal inclusions in the sporulating cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Derived Insect Control Proteins
    CONSENSUS DOCUMENT ON SAFETY INFORMATION ON TRANSGENIC PLANTS EXPRESSING BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS - DERIVED INSECT CONTROL PROTEINS U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2007)14 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 19-Jul-2007 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND Un ENV/JM/MONO(2007) THE WORKING PARTY ON CHEMICALS, PESTICIDES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY cl assi fi ed 14 CONSENSUS DOCUMENT ON SAFETY INFORMATION ON TRANSGENIC PLANTS EXPRESSING BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS - DERIVED INSECT CONTROL PROTEINS Eng lis h - O JT03230400 r . Eng lish Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format ENV/JM/MONO(2007)14 Also published in the Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology: No. 1, Commercialisation of Agricultural Products Derived through Modern Biotechnology: Survey Results (1995) No. 2, Analysis of Information Elements Used in the Assessment of Certain Products of Modern Biotechnology (1995) No. 3, Report of the OECD Workshop on the Commercialisation of Agricultural Products Derived through Modern Biotechnology (1995) No. 4, Industrial Products of Modern Biotechnology Intended for Release to the Environment: The Proceedings of the Fribourg Workshop (1996) No. 5, Consensus Document on General Information concerning the Biosafety of Crop Plants Made Virus Resistant through Coat Protein Gene-Mediated Protection (1996) No. 6, Consensus Document on Information Used in the Assessment of Environmental Applications Involving Pseudomonas (1997) No. 7, Consensus Document on the Biology of Brassica napus L. (Oilseed Rape) (1997) No. 8, Consensus Document on the Biology of Solanum tuberosum subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacillus Thuringiensis Cry1ab Delta-Endotoxin Protein and The
    Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab Delta-Endotoxin Protein and the Genetic Material Necessary for Its Production (via Elements of Vector pZO1502) in Event Bt11 Corn (OECD Unique Identifier: SYN-BTØ11-1)(006444) & Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa20 Insecticidal Protein and the Genetic Material Necessary for Its Production (via Elements of Vector pNOV1300) in Event On This Page I. Use Sites, Target Pests, and Application Methods II. Science Assessment III. Terms and Conditions of the Registration IV. Additional Contact Information Summary The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has conditionally registered a plant-incorporated protectant (PIP) product containing Syngenta Seeds, Incorporated’s (hereafter referred to as Syngenta) new active ingredient, Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa20 insecticidal protein and the genetic material necessary for its production (via elements of vector pNOV1300) in Event MIR162 maize (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] Unique Identifier: SYN-IR162-4). This new product, Bt11 x MIR162 corn (expressing previously registered Cry1Ab and Vip3Aa20, respectively), is intended for commercial distribution and use. The Agency has determined that the use of this pesticide is in the public interest and that it will not cause any unreasonable adverse effects on the environment during the time of conditional registration. The registrant for this product is Syngenta. On August 6, 2008, a tolerance exemption under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 174 became effective for Vip3Aa proteins, when used as plant-incorporated protectants, in or on corn and cotton (40 CFR § 174.501). The exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of Vip3Aa proteins is inclusive of the Vip3Aa20 insecticidal protein and its use in corn.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacillus Thuringiensis As a Specific, Safe, and Effective Tool for Insect Pest Control
    J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2007), 17(4), 547–559 Bacillus thuringiensis as a Specific, Safe, and Effective Tool for Insect Pest Control ROH, JONG YUL, JAE YOUNG CHOI, MING SHUN LI, BYUNG RAE JIN1, AND YEON HO JE* Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea 1College of Natural Resources and Life Science, Dong-A University, Busan 604-714, Korea Received: November 21, 2006 Accepted: January 2, 2007 Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) was first described by Berliner The insecticidal bacterium Bt is a Gram-positive [10] when he isolated a Bacillus species from the Mediterranean bacterium that produces proteinaceous inclusions during flour moth, Anagasta kuehniella, and named it after the sporulation [53]. These inclusions can be distinguished as province Thuringia in Germany where the infected moth distinctively shaped crystals by phase-contrast microscopy. was found. Although this was the first description under The inclusions are composed of proteins known as crystal the name B. thuringiensis, it was not the first isolation. In proteins, Cry proteins, or δ-endotoxins, which are highly 1901, a Japanese biologist, Ishiwata Shigetane, discovered toxic to a wide variety of important agricultural and a previously undescribed bacterium as the causative health-related insect pests as well as other invertebrates. agent of a disease afflicting silkworms. Bt was originally Because of their high specificity and their safety for the considered a risk for silkworm rearing but it has become environment, crystal proteins are a valuable alternative the heart of microbial insect control. The earliest commercial to chemical pesticides for control of insect pests in production began in France in 1938, under the name agriculture and forestry and in the home.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Insects Under the Effect of Bt Maize and Insecticides Diversidade De Insetos Sob a Influência Do Milho Bt E Inseticidas
    AGRICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY / SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE DOI: 10.1590/1808-1657000062015 Diversity of insects under the effect of Bt maize and insecticides Diversidade de insetos sob a influência do milho Bt e inseticidas Marina Regina Frizzas1*, Charles Martins de Oliveira2, Celso Omoto3 ABSTRACT: The genetically modified maize to control RESUMO: O milho geneticamente modificado visando ao controle some caterpillars has been widely used in Brazil. The effect de lagartas tem sido amplamente utilizado no Brasil. Em estudo de of Bt maize and insecticides was evaluated on the diversity of campo realizado em Ponta Grossa (Paraná, Brasil), compararam-se, insects (species richness and abundance), based on the insect com base na diversidade (riqueza de espécies e abundância), os efeitos community, functional groups and species. This study was do milho Bt e do controle químico sobre a comunidade de insetos, conducted in genetically modified maize MON810, which grupos funcionais e espécies. A comunidade de insetos foi amostrada expresses the Cry1Ab protein from Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, no milho geneticamente modificado MON810, que expressa a proteína and conventional maize with and without insecticide sprays Cry1Ab de Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner, e no milho convencional (lufenuron and lambda-cyhalothrin) under field conditions com e sem a aplicação de inseticidas (lufenuron e lambda-cialotrina). in Ponta Grossa (Paraná state, Brazil). Insect samplings were As amostragens foram realizadas por meio da coleta de insetos utili- performed by using pitfall trap, water tray trap and yellow sticky zando-se armadilha de queda, bandeja-d’água e cartão adesivo. Foram card. A total of 253,454 insects were collected, distributed coletados 253.454 insetos, distribuídos em nove ordens, 82 famílias among nine orders, 82 families and 241 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn Earworm, Helicoverpa Zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 John L
    EENY-145 Corn Earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)1 John L. Capinera2 Distribution California; and perhaps seven in southern Florida and southern Texas. The life cycle can be completed in about 30 Corn earworm is found throughout North America except days. for northern Canada and Alaska. In the eastern United States, corn earworm does not normally overwinter suc- Egg cessfully in the northern states. It is known to survive as far north as about 40 degrees north latitude, or about Kansas, Eggs are deposited singly, usually on leaf hairs and corn Ohio, Virginia, and southern New Jersey, depending on the silk. The egg is pale green when first deposited, becoming severity of winter weather. However, it is highly dispersive, yellowish and then gray with time. The shape varies from and routinely spreads from southern states into northern slightly dome-shaped to a flattened sphere, and measures states and Canada. Thus, areas have overwintering, both about 0.5 to 0.6 mm in diameter and 0.5 mm in height. overwintering and immigrant, or immigrant populations, Fecundity ranges from 500 to 3000 eggs per female. The depending on location and weather. In the relatively mild eggs hatch in about three to four days. Pacific Northwest, corn earworm can overwinter at least as far north as southern Washington. Larva Upon hatching, larvae wander about the plant until they Life Cycle and Description encounter a suitable feeding site, normally the reproductive structure of the plant. Young larvae are not cannibalistic, so This species is active throughout the year in tropical and several larvae may feed together initially.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacillus ACT 2021
    Bacillus ACT 2021 9th International Conference on Bacillus anthracis, cereus and thuringiensis April 26-28, 2021 Online Table of contents CONTACTS 3 GUIDELINES FOR ATTENDING THE MEETING 4 SPONSORS 5 PROGRAM 7 EPIDEMIOLOGY, ECOLOGY AND ADAPTATION 7 PHYSIOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT (1) 8 PHYSIOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT (2) 8 HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS 9 SPORE PROPERTIES 10 GENOMIC, PHYLOGENY AND MOBILE ELEMENTS 10 TOXINS AND THERAPIES 11 NEXT BACILLUS ACT CONFERENCE 13 ABSTRACTS 15 SPEAKERS 52 2 Contacts Steering committee Tjakko Abee (Wageningen University, the Netherlands) Rakesh Bhatnagar (Jawaharlal Nehru University, India) Steven Blanke (Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, USA) Monika Ehling-Schulz (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria) Arthur M. Friedlander (USAMRIID, USA) Michel Gohar (INRAE Jouy-en-Josas, France) Jean-Nicolas Tournier (IRBA, France) Organizing committee Véronique Broussolle (INRAE Avignon, France) Michel Gohar (INRAE Jouy-en-Josas, France) Leyla Slamti (INRAE, Jouy-en-Josas, France) Jean-Nicolas Tournier (IRBA, France) Session chairs Steve Blanke (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA) Frédéric Carlin (INRAE Avignon, France) Theodor Chitlaru (Israel Institute for Biological Research, Israel) Monika Ehling-Schulz (University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria) Arthur M. Friedlander (USAMRIID, USA) Annika Gillis (UCLouvain, Belgium) Theresa Koehler (UTHealth, USA) Didier Lereclus (INRAE Jouy-en-Josas, France) Jacques Mahillon (UCLouvain, Belgium) Anne Moir (University of Sheffield, UK) Ole Andreas Økstad (University of Oslo, Norway) Ben Raymond (University of Exeter, UK) 3 Guidelines for attending the meeting The BACT 2021 conference will be held on the Zoom webinar platform. There is no need to create a Zoom account or download any software. You can access the webinar by clicking on the link that was sent to you a few days prior to the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Bt Safe for Humans to Eat? Published May 2018
    Entomological Society of America Sharing Insect Science Globally Is Bt Safe for Humans to Eat? Published May 2018 • Bt is a bacterium that is not toxic to humans or other mammals but is toxic to certain insects when ingested. • Bt works as an insecticide by producing a crystal-shaped protein (Cry toxin) that specifically kills certain insects. • Bt is naturally found on leaves and in soil worldwide and has been used commercially both in organic and conventional agriculture for over fifty years. • Most genetically engineered, insect-resistant crops express one or more Bt insecticidal Cry toxins. • Over two decades of review, the EPA and numerous scientific bodies have consistently found that Bt and engineered Bt-crops are not harmful to humans. Timeline of Bt Discoveries “Bt-corn & Bt-cotton do Bt as a biopesticide Cry toxins rst First Cry toxin-expressing not pose unreasonable discovered rst commercially available plants rst produced reassessed as safe risks to human health or (Japan) (France) (Belgium) (USA) the environment.” -EPA 1911 1956 1995 2010 1901 1938 1987 2001 Present Recognized as a Bt Cry toxin EPA rst approves Cry toxins powerful & highly understood as of Bt crop safety reassessed as specic insect pathogen insecticidal agent and use safe again (Germany) (Canada) (USA) (USA) What is Bt? Bacillus thuringiensis (often referred to as simply “Bt”) is a common, naturally occurring bacterium found in soils and on plant leaves worldwide. First discovered in 1901 in Japan, Bt has revolutionized how we stop insects from eating our crops. For over fifty years, Bt has been applied directly to a variety of agricultural crops and plants in home gardens as a living pesticide to control insect pests.
    [Show full text]