Appendix A: Relativity and Electromagnetism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix A: Relativity and Electromagnetism Appendix A: Relativity and Electromagnetism In this appendix we examine and, relativistically, modify Newtonian particle mechanics; thus, it would be natural to look with the same intention at Maxwell’s electrodynamics, at first in a vacuum. That theory, however, turns out to be already “special-relativistic.” Unlike Newtonian mechanics, classical electrodynamics is consistent with special relativity. Maxwell’s equations and Lorentz’s force law can be applied legitimately in any inertial system (e.g., system S). The only two assumptions we need to make about the electromagnetic force are that it is pure force—in other words, rest mass is preserving—and that it acts on particles in proportion to point charge q, which they carry. Beyond that only “simplicity” and some analogies with Newton’s gravitational theory will guide us, which what this appendix is all about. A.1 Introduction With corrected Newtonian mechanics, we are now in a position to develop a complete and consistent formulation of relativistic electrodynamics. We will not be changing the rules of electrodynamics at all, however; rather, we will be expressing these rules in a notation that exposes and illustrates their relativistic character. As we said the at the beginning of this appendix, the intention is to look at Maxwell’s electrodynamics and its basic laws, as they have been summarized by the four Maxwell’s equations, plus Lorentz’s force law , are for an invariant condition under Lorentz transformations from one inertial frame to another. As also mentioned before, by inertial frame with only two assumptions: (1) the force induced from electromagnetics (EM) will be a pure force; and (2) the rest mass of moving particles persevere, and that it acts on particles in proportion to point charge q, which the particle carries. Indeed, it was the problem of finding a transformation that leaves © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 493 B. Zohuri, Scalar Wave Driven Energy Applications, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91023-9 494 Appendix A: Relativity and Electromagnetism Maxwell’s equations invariant, which led Lorentz to the discovery of the equations now associated with his name. Nevertheless, even though relativity did not modify Maxwell’s theory in a vacuum, it added immeasurably to our understanding of it and also gave us a new means for working in it. On the other hand, the theory of electromagnetism in moving media, originally because of Minkowski, is purely a relativistic development [1]. Maxwell’s theory, within its old Galilean framework, seems quite far-fetched. Galileo was the first one to observe that a brick on a table, to which is applied a shoving force, soon comes to a stop when a certain time elapses after the initial shove because of friction between the two surfaces (i.e., brick and table). He also con- cluded, however, that the more you polish the surface of a brick, or a table, the farther the brick travels. Moreover, if the table itself is moving, the brick comes to rest with respect to the table, not the floor across which the table is moving or standing. Galileo concluded that the brick stops because of the friction that may exist between the brick and the table, as we said. If you can eliminate all existing friction by some means of polishing the surfaces to perfect smoothness, then the brick would keep moving forever. Newton, of course, incorporated this discovery into his first law of motion into the classical mechanics of motion [2]. In the real world and in practice, some friction always exists; however, this does not bring an object to an “absolute” state of rest, but merely to rest with respect to whatever it is rubbing against. Within relativity, on the other hand, it is one of the two or three simplest possible theories of a field force such as Yukawa-Klein- Gordon’s scalar meson field theory and Nordström’s attempt at a special-relativistic theory of gravity. In fact, rather than verifying that Maxwell’s equations are Lorentz invariant,we will use a synthetic approach that will parallel what we know about classical mechanics and highlight once more the “human-made” aspect of physical laws. We will construct a relativistic field theory that is consistent with just a very few of the basic facts of electromagnetism, and we intend to find that it is Maxwell’s. Thus, the main purpose of this appendix is to provide a deeper understanding of the structure of electrodynamics laws that had seemed arbitrary and unrelated before taking on a kind of coherence and inevitability when approached from the point of view of relativity. To begin with we will show why there needs to be such a thing as magnetism, given electrostatics and relativity, and how, in particular, we can calculate the magnetic force between a current-carrying wire and a moving charge without ever invoking the laws of magnetism. Using Fig. A.1, suppose you had a string of positive charges moving along to the right at speed υ. We will assume the charges are close enough together so that we can regard them as a continuous line charge λ. Superimposed on this positive string is a negative one, Àλ, proceeding to the left at the same speed υ. We then have a net current to the right of magnitude: I ¼ 2λυ ðA:1Þ Appendix A: Relativity and Electromagnetism 495 a –––() –λ v – –– v + + + ()+λ +++ s u q b ––– (λ – v –) – – – v + + ()λ+ + + + s q Fig. A.1 Illustration of moving particle q Meanwhile, distance s away there is a point charge q traveling to the right at speed u < υ, as shown in Fig. A.1a. Because, the two line charges cancel each other, there is no electrical force on charge q in this system S. We now examine the same situation from another system’s point of view— namely, system S, which moves to the right with speed u, as illustrated in Fig. A.1b. In this frame of reference charge particle q is at rest. According to Einstein’s theory and his velocity addition rule, however, the velocities of the positive and negative lines are now defined by the following equation: υ Ç u υÆ ¼ ðA:2Þ 1 Ç υu=c2 Because υÀ has a greater value than υ+, the Lorentz contraction of the space between negative charges is more severe than that between positive charges; in this frame, therefore, the wire carries net negative charges [2]. In fact, λÆ ¼ÆðÞγÆ λ0 ðA:3Þ where 496 Appendix A: Relativity and Electromagnetism 1 γÆ ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðA:4Þ 2 2 1 À υÆ=c and λ0 is the charge density of the positive line in its own rest system. Still, that is not the same as λ; indeed, in system S they already are moving at speed υ, thus: λ ¼ γλ ð : Þ 0 A 5 It takes some algebra to put γÆ into a simple form as: 2 Ç υ γ ¼ rffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi1 ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffic u Æ ÀÁ 1 À2 2 2 1 À ðÞυ Ç u 2 1 Ç υu=c2 ðÞc2 Ç uυ À c2ðÞυ Ç u c2 ð : Þ () A 6 2 Ç υ Ç υ= 2 ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffic u ¼ γ p1ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiu c ðÞÀc2 À υ2 ðÞc2 À u2 1 À u2=c2 Naturally, then, the net line change in frame system S is going to be: ÀÁÀ2λuυ λtotal ¼ λþ þ λÀ ¼ λ0 γþ À γÀ ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ðA:7Þ c2 1 À u2=c2 At the conclusion, as the result of unequal Lorentz contraction of the positive and negative lines, we can see that a electrically neutral current-carrying wire in one inertial system will be charged in another. Now a line charge λtotal sets up an electric field as: λ E ¼ total ðA:8Þ 2πε0s But if there is a force on charge particle q in system S, there must be one in system S as well; in fact, we can calculate it by using the transformation rules for forces. Because charge q is at rest in system S and force F is perpendicular to u, the force in system S is given by a set of equations as follows: 8 < ~ 1~ F⊥ ¼ F⊥ γ ðA:9Þ : Fk ¼ Fk This equation is valid under the condition that particle q is instantaneously at rest in system S, as we mentioned in the preceding as part of the two conditions and assumptions. Equation A.9 is the component of vector force ~F parallel to the motion of system S and is unchanged, whereas components perpendicular are divided by γ [2]. Note that perhaps it may occur to us that we could avoid the bad transformation behavior of force ~F by introducing a “proper” force, analogous to proper velocity, Appendix A: Relativity and Electromagnetism 497 that would be the derivative of momentum with respect to proper time; it can be written as: dpμ Kμ ðA:10Þ dτ Equation A.10 is a presentation of what is called Minkowski force, and it is plainly a 4-vector because pμ is a 4-vector and proper time is invariant. The spatial components of Kμ are related to the “ordinary” force by: dt d ~p K~ ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ~F ðA:11Þ dτ 1 À u2=c2 while the zeroth component is provided as: dp0 1 dE K0 ¼ ¼ ðA:12Þ dτ c dτ Remember that γ and β pertain to the motion of system S with respect to system S, and they are constant values and that ~u is the velocity of the particle q with respect to S. See Chap. 4 of this book, section “Electrodynamics and Relativity,”for some further details.
Recommended publications
  • 50 31-01-2018 Time: 60 Min
    8thAHMED BIN ABOOD MEMORIAL State Level Physics-Maths Knowledge Test-2018 Organized by Department of Physics Department of Mathematics Milliya Arts, Science and Management Science College, BEED Max. Marks: 50 31-01-2018 Time: 60 min Instructions:- All the questions carry equal marks. Mobile and Calculators are not allowed. Student must write his/her names, college name and allotted seat number on the response sheet provided. Student must stick the answer in the prescribed response sheet by completely blacken the oval with black/blue pen only. Incorrect Method Correct Method Section A 1) If the earth completely loses its gravity, then for any body……… (a) both mass and weight becomes zero (b) neither mass nor weight becomes zero (c) weight becomes zero but not the mass (d) mass becomes zero but not the weight 2) The angular speed of a flywheel is 3π rad/s. It is rotating at…….. (a) 3 rpm (b) 6 rpm (c) 90 rpm (d) 60 rpm 3) Resonance occurs when …. (a) a body vibrates at a frequency lower than its normal frequency. (b) a body vibrates at a frequency higher than its normal frequency. (c) a body is set into vibrations with its natural frequency of another body vibrating with the same frequency. (d) a body is made of the same material as the sound source. 4) The SI unit of magnetic flux density is…… (a) tesla (b) henry (c) volt (d) volt-second 5) Ampere’s circuital law is integral form of….. (a) Lenz’s law (b) Faraday’s law (c) Biot-Savart’s law (d) Coulomb’s law 1 6) The energy band gap is highest in the case of …….
    [Show full text]
  • Photon Mapping Superluminal Particles
    EUROGRAPHICS 2020/ F. Banterle and A. Wilkie Short Paper Photon Mapping Superluminal Particles G. Waldemarson1;2 and M. Doggett2 1Arm Ltd, Sweden 2 Lund University, Sweden Abstract One type of light source that remains largely unexplored in the field of light transport rendering is the light generated by superluminal particles, a phenomenon more commonly known as Cherenkov radiation [C37ˇ ]. By re-purposing the Frank-Tamm equation [FT91] for rendering, the energy output of these particles can be estimated and consequently mapped to photons, making it possible to visualize the brilliant blue light characteristic of the effect. In this paper we extend a stochastic progressive photon mapper and simulate the emission of superluminal particles from a source object close to a medium with a high index of refraction. In practice, the source is treated as a new kind of light source, allowing us to efficiently reuse existing photon mapping methods. CCS Concepts • Computing methodologies ! Ray tracing; 1. Introduction in the direction of the particle but will not otherwise cross one an- other, as depicted in figure 1. However, if the particle travels faster In the late 19th and early 20th century, the phenomenon today than these spheres the waves will constructively interfere, generat- known as Cherenkov radiation were predicted and observed a num- ing coherent photons at an angle proportional to the velocity of the ber of times [Wat11] but it was first properly investigated in 1934 particle, similar to the propagation of a sonic boom from supersonic by Pavel Cherenkov under the supervision of Sergey Vavilov at the aircraft. Formally, this occurs when the criterion c0 = c < v < c Lebedev Institute [C37ˇ ].
    [Show full text]
  • La Universidad Nacional De Investigación Nuclear “Instituto De Ingeniería Física De Moscú”
    la Universidad Nacional de Investigación Nuclear “Instituto de Ingeniería Física de Moscú” Año de fundaciónón: 1942 Total de estudiantes: 7 064 / Estudiantes extranjeros: 1 249 Facultades: 12 / Departamentos: 76 Profesores: 1 503 Profesor Docentes Doctor en ciencias Candidatos de las ciencias Profesores extranjeros 512 649 461 759 223 Principales programas de educación para los extranjeros: 177 Licenciatura Maestría Especialista Formación del personal altamente calificado 55 68 23 31 Programas educativos adicionales para los extranjeros: 13 Programa de preparación El estudio de la lengua rusa Programas cortos preuniversitaria como extranjera Otros programas 11 1 1 The history of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) began with the foundation in 1942 of the Moscow Mechanical Institute of Ammunition. The leading Russian nuclear university MEPhI was later established there and top Soviet scientists, including the head of the Soviet atomic project Igor Kurchatov, played a part in its development and formation. Six Nobel Prize winners have worked at MEPhI over the course of its history – Nikolay Basov, Andrei Sakharov, Nikolay Semenov, Igor Tamm, Ilya Frank and Pavel Cherenkov. Today, MEPhI is one of the leading research universities of Russia, training engineers and scientists in more than 200 fields. The most promising areas of study include: Nanomaterials and nanotechnologies; Radiation and beam technologies; Medical physics and nuclear medicine; Superconductivity and controlled thermonuclear fusion; Ecology and biophysics; Information security. In addition, future managers, experts and analysts in the fields of management, engineering economics, nuclear law and international scientific and technological cooperation study at MEPhI. Programmes at MEPhI: 1 Meet international standards for quality of education.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIAN SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY STRUCTURE There Are Around 4000 Organizations in Russia Involved in Research and Development with Almost One Million Personnel
    RUSSIAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STRUCTURE There are around 4000 organizations in Russia involved in research and development with almost one million personnel. Half of those people are doing scientific research. It is coordinated by Ministry of industry, science and technologies, where strategy and basic priorities of research and development are being formulated. Fundamental scientific research is concentrated in Russian Academy of Sciences, which now includes hundreds of institutes specializing in all major scientific disciplines such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, Earth sciences etc. The applied science and technology is mainly done in Institutions and Design Bureaus belonging to different Russian Ministers. They are involved in research and development in nuclear energy (Ministry of atomic energy), space exploration (Russian aviation and space agency), defense (Ministry of defense), telecommunications (Ministry of communications) and so on. Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences is the community of the top-ranking Russian scientists and principal coordinating body for basic research in natural and social sciences, technology and production in Russia. It is composed of more than 350 research institutions. Outstanding Russian scientists are elected to the Academy, where membership is of three types - academicians, corresponding members and foreign members. The Academy is also involved in post graduate training of students and in publicizing scientific achievements and knowledge. It maintains
    [Show full text]
  • Chdr-CHEESE Cherenkov DiRaction Radiation - Characteristic Energy Emissions on Surfaces Experiment
    ChDR-CHEESE Cherenkov Diraction Radiation - Characteristic Energy Emissions on Surfaces Experiment Silas Ruhrberg Estévez, Tobias Baumgartner, Philipp Loewe, Lukas Hildebrandt, Thomas Lehrach, Tobias Thole, Benildur Nickel, Tristan Matsulevits, Johann Bahl Werner-von-Siemens-Gymnasium Berlin March 31, 2020 1 Introduction Beam diagnostics are crucial for smooth accelerator operations. Approaches in the past have mainly focused on technologies where the beam properties are signicantly aected by the measurement. Recently, groups have performed experiments for non-invasive beam diagnostics using Cherenkov Diraction Radiation (ChDR) [1]. Unlike regular Cherenkov Radiation, the charged particles (e.g. electrons and positrons) do not have to move inside of the medium, but it is sucient for them to move in its vicinity as long as they are faster than the speed of light in the medium. Changes to the beam properties due to ChDR-measurements are negligible and therefore ChDR could be used for non-invasive beam diagnostics in future colliders [2]. 2 Why we want to go We are a group of high school students from Berlin with a great interest in physics. We discovered our passion for particle physics after visiting both the BESSY II synchrotron in Berlin and the LHC at CERN as a part of our physics studies. Since then we continued pursuing an active interest in particle physics, and when we heard about the BL4S com- petition we decided that we wanted to take part in this once in a lifetime opportunity. We hope to gain rst-hand insights into particle physics and to be able to share these insights with our friends and fellow pupils to promote interest and contribute to understanding of physics at our school.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultra-Monochromatic Far-Infrared Cherenkov Diffraction Radiation in A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Ultra‑monochromatic far‑infrared Cherenkov difraction radiation in a super‑radiant regime P. Karataev1*, K. Fedorov1,2, G. Naumenko2, K. Popov2, A. Potylitsyn2 & A. Vukolov2 Nowadays, intense electromagnetic (EM) radiation in the far‑infrared (FIR) spectral range is an advanced tool for scientifc research in biology, chemistry, and material science because many materials leave signatures in the radiation spectrum. Narrow‑band spectral lines enable researchers to investigate the matter response in greater detail. The generation of highly monochromatic variable frequency FIR radiation has therefore become a broad area of research. High energy electron beams consisting of a long train of dense bunches of particles provide a super‑radiant regime and can generate intense highly monochromatic radiation due to coherent emission in the spectral range from a few GHz to potentially a few THz. We employed novel coherent Cherenkov difraction radiation (ChDR) as a generation mechanism. This efect occurs when a fast charged particle moves in the vicinity of and parallel to a dielectric interface. Two key features of the ChDR phenomenon are its non‑invasive nature and its photon yield being proportional to the length of the radiator. The bunched structure of the very long electron beam produced spectral lines that were observed to have frequencies upto 21 GHz and with a relative bandwidth of 10–4 ~ 10–5. The line bandwidth and intensity are defned by the shape and length of the bunch train. A compact linear accelerator can be utilized to control the resonant wavelength by adjusting the bunch sequence frequency. A fast particle passing by an atom interacts with the electron shell forming a dipole that oscillates, inducing polarization currents that are changing in time 1.
    [Show full text]
  • One Century of Cosmic Rays – a Particle Physicist\'S View
    EPJ Web of Conferences 105, 00001 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201510500001 c Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 One century of cosmic rays – A particle physicist’s view Christine Suttona CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Abstract. Experiments on cosmic rays and the elementary particles share a common history that dates back to the 19th century. Following the discovery of radioactivity in the 1890s, the paths of the two fields intertwined, especially during the decades after the discovery of cosmic rays. Experiments demonstrated that the primary cosmic rays are positively charged particles, while other studies of cosmic rays revealed various new sub-atomic particles, including the first antiparticle. Techniques developed in common led to the birth of neutrino astronomy in 1987 and the first observation of a cosmic γ -ray source by a ground-based cosmic-ray telescope in 1989. 1. Introduction remove the air led to the discovery of “cathode rays” emitted from the cathode at one end of the tube. In 1879, in “There are more things in heaven and earth than are the course of investigations in England, William Crookes dreamt of in your philosophy ...” (Hamlet, William discovered that the speed of the discharge along the length Shakespeare). of a vacuum tube decreased as he reduced the pressure. This indicated that ionization of the air was causing the The modern fields of cosmic-ray studies and experimental discharge. particle physics have much in common, as they both The last few years of the 19th century saw a burst investigate the high-energy interactions of subatomic of discoveries that not only cast light on the effect that particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Physics Prize Winners (બૌતિકળાસ્ત્ર નોફર ઩ારયિોત઴ક) YEAR NAME CONTRY 1901 તલલ્શભે કોનાડડ યોન્િે狍ન જભડની એ囍વ યે ની ળોધ ભાટે 1902 Hendrik A
    Nobel Physics Prize Winners (બૌતિકળાસ્ત્ર નોફર ઩ારયિોત઴ક) YEAR NAME CONTRY 1901 તલલ્શભે કોનાડડ યોન્િે狍ન જભડની એ囍વ યે ની ળોધ ભાટે 1902 Hendrik A. Lorentz નેધયરેન્્વ Pieter Zeeman નેધયરેન્્વ 1903 Antoine Henri Becquerel ફ્ા廒વ ત઩મયે કયયૂ ી નોફર ઩યુ કાય પ્રાપ્િ કયનાય ઩તિ-઩ત્ની ફ્ા廒વ ભેડભ ક્યયૂ ી ભેડભ કયયૂ ી નોફર ઩યુ કાય પ્રાપ્િ કયનાય ઩ોરેન્ડ - ફ્ા廒વ પ્રથભ ભરશરા ફની. 1904 John W. Strutt ગ્રેટ બ્રિટન 1905 Philipp E. A. von Lenard જભડની 1906 Sir Joseph J. Thomson ગ્રેટ બ્રિટન 1907 Albert A. Michelson યનુ ાઇટેડ ટેટવ 1908 Gabriel Lippmann ફ્ા廒વ 1909 Carl F. Braun જભડની Guglielmo Marconi ઇટરી 1910 Johannes D. van der નેધયરેન્્વ Waals 1911 Wilhelm Wien જભડની 1912 Nils G. Dalen લીડન 1913 Heike Kamerlingh નેધયરેન્્વ Onnes 1914 Max von Laue જભડની 1915 વય તલબ્રરમભ રોયેન્વ િેગડ ગ્રેટ બ્રિટન વૌથી નાની લમે રપબ્રઝ囍વન 廒ુ નોફર ભે઱લનાય 1916 1917 Charles G. Barkla ગ્રેટ બ્રિટન 1918 ભે囍વ કે.ઈ.એર.પ્રા廒ક જભડની 囍લાટ廒 ભની ભશત્લની ળોધ ભાટે 1919 જોશન્વન ટાકડ જભડની 1920 Charles E. Guillaume ફ્ા廒વ 1921 આલ્ફટડ આઈન્ટાઇન જભડની - અભેરયકા ASHWIN DIVEKAR Page 1 1922 તનલ્વ ફોશય ડન્ે ભાકડ 1923 યોફટડ એ. તભબ્રરકન અભેરયકા 1924 Karl M. G. Siegbahn લીડન 1925 狇મ્વ ફ્ા廒ક જભડની Gustav Hertz જભડની 1926 Jean B. Perrin ફ્ા廒વ 1927 Arthur H. Compton અભેરયકા ચાલ્વડ ટી.આય.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions of Civilizations to International Prizes
    CONTRIBUTIONS OF CIVILIZATIONS TO INTERNATIONAL PRIZES Split of Nobel prizes and Fields medals by civilization : PHYSICS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 CHEMISTRY .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 PHYSIOLOGY / MEDECINE .............................................................................................................................................. 3 LITERATURE ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ECONOMY ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 MATHEMATICS (Fields) .................................................................................................................................................. 5 PHYSICS Occidental / Judeo-christian (198) Alekseï Abrikossov / Zhores Alferov / Hannes Alfvén / Eric Allin Cornell / Luis Walter Alvarez / Carl David Anderson / Philip Warren Anderson / EdWard Victor Appleton / ArthUr Ashkin / John Bardeen / Barry C. Barish / Nikolay Basov / Henri BecqUerel / Johannes Georg Bednorz / Hans Bethe / Gerd Binnig / Patrick Blackett / Felix Bloch / Nicolaas Bloembergen
    [Show full text]
  • A Nature of Science Guided Approach to the Physics Teaching of Cosmic Rays
    A Nature of Science guided approach to the physics teaching of Cosmic Rays Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Philosophie (Dr. phil. { Doctor philosophiae) eingereicht am Fachbereich 4 Mathematik, Naturwissenschaften, Wirtschaft & Informatik der Universit¨atHildesheim vorgelegt von Rosalia Madonia geboren am 20. August 1961 in Palermo 2018 Schwerpunkt der Arbeit: Didaktik der Physik Tag der Disputation: 21 Januar 2019 Dekan: Prof. Dr. M. Sauerwein 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ute Kraus 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Peter Grabmayr ii Abstract This thesis focuses on cosmic rays and Nature of Science (NOS). The first aim of this work is to investigate whether the variegated aspects of cosmic ray research -from its historical development to the science topics addressed herein- can be used for a teaching approach with and about NOS. The efficacy of the NOS based teaching has been highlighted in many studies, aimed at developing innovative and more effective teaching strategies. The fil rouge that we propose unwinds through cosmic ray research, that with its century long history appears to be the perfect topic for a study of and through NOS. The second aim of the work is to find out what knowledge the pupils and students have regarding the many aspect of NOS. To this end we have designed, executed, and analyzed the outcomes of a sample-based investigation carried out with pupils and students in Palermo (Italy), T¨ubingenand Hildesheim (Germany), and constructed around an open-ended ques- tionnaire. The main goal is to study whether intrinsic differences between the German and Italian samples can be observed. The thesis is divided in three parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Including the Inertia to a 1D Model a Study on Energy Radiation in Railway Tracks
    Including the inertia to a 1D model A study on energy radiation in railway tracks Bilal Ouchene Delft University of Technology Including the inertia to a 1D model A study on energy radiation in railway tracks by Bilal Ouchene to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Tuesday April 7, 2021 at 13:00. Student number: 4480333 Thesis committee: Dr. ir. K.N. van Dalen (chair), Dynamics of Solids and Structures Prof. dr. ir. A.V. Metrikine, Dynamics of Solids and Structures Ir. A.B. Faragau, Dynamics of Solids and Structures Ir. J.S. Hoving, Offshore Engineering An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Acknowledgements ﺑﺴﻢ اﷲ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ اﻟﺮﺣﯿﻢ In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful. This thesis is the final report of the study ‘Including the inertia to a 1D model: a study on energy radiation in railway tracks’ which I carried out as MSc-graduation candidate in order to finish my studies at the faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, at Delft University of Technology. The period in which I performed this study has been one filled with commitment, hard work, interest, aversion, setbacks and accomplishments. Along the way I have encountered different complications that tempted me to just finish the job and get it over with. I am happy to say that I did not take the easy way out and it has shown me once again that hard work makes that what is hard easy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneers in Optics: Pavel Alekseyevich Cherenkov and John Frederick William Herschel
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core MicroscopyPioneers Pioneers in Optics: Pavel Alekseyevich Cherenkov and John Frederick William Herschel . IP address: Michael W. Davidson National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306 170.106.202.8 [email protected] , on Pavel Alekseyevich Cherenkov possible by the fact that light travels more slowly through a 29 Sep 2021 at 21:32:40 (1904–1990) transparent medium than it does in a vacuum, so that in air, The son of Russian peasants, Pavel Cherenkov faced a water, and certain other substances, elementary particles may significant amount of adversity in his life, but he persevered surpass the velocity of light in that medium. admirably. He was born in the village of Novaya Chigla in the Although early on Cherenkov’s devoted study to the Vornezh province and optical effect and special form of electromagnetic radiation grew up in a tumultuous that now bear his name was derided by some of his colleagues , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at time when Russia was who believed it to be a pointless endeavor, in time the utility engaged in war and of the strange bluish glow would become apparent. Today, revolution. At the age of the Cherenkov effect is considered invaluable to the field two, Cherenkov lost his of spectroscopy, as well as to the study of cosmic rays and mother, and his father other high-speed particles. Cherenkov counters, which are soon remarried, consign- specialized instruments that can measure particle velocity by ing much of his and his using the light emitted by Cherenkov radiation, have garnered sister’s upbringing to a widespread use by experimental scientists studying particle and stepmother.
    [Show full text]