DOCSLIB.ORG

From Rome to Sibiu – the European Council and the Future of Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Rome to Sibiu – the European Council and the Future of Europe From Rome to Sibiu The European Council and the Future of Europe debate From Rome to Sibiu The European Council and the Future of Europe debate Study Abstract The purpose of this paper is to assess the follow-up and delivery by the European Council on the priorities that were set in the declaration adopted in Rome on 25 March 2017 on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the Treaties of Rome. The analysis shows that in the year since Rome, and a year before the special summit on the Future of Europe debate, due to take place in the Romanian city of Sibiu on 9 May 2019, substantive progress has been made regarding the debate itself and implementation of the policy priorities identified in the Bratislava Declaration/Roadmap and the Rome Declaration. The evidence so far suggests that the European Council, as well as the other EU institutions, have followed up on the pledges made in Rome, in an effort to boost the legitimacy of the EU, connect with a disaffected public, and combat Euroscepticism. The Leaders' Agenda, adopted by October 2017, made an important contribution to the Future of Europe debate and, furthermore, was a potentially far-reaching institutional innovation for the European Council. Under the Leaders' Agenda, discussions among Heads of State or Government now attempt to resolve seemingly intractable policy disputes by means of a new working method. Not only has this helped to operationalise the Rome Declaration, it seems also to have consolidated the European Council's position at the centre of the EU policy-making and agenda-setting framework. For more general information on this topic, see the parallel EPRS publication, The Future of Europe – Contours of the current debate, and also visit the European Parliament homepage on Future of Europe. AUTHORS Suzana Anghel and Ralf Drachenberg, Policy Analysts, European Council Oversight Unit Desmond Dinan, Professor of Public Policy, George Mason University, Virginia, USA, in his capacity as Visiting Fellow with EPRS. To contact the Unit, please email: EPRS-EuropeanCouncil [email protected] ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the European Council Oversight Unit of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value, within the Directorate–General for Parliamentary Research Services of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. Manuscript completed in April 2018. Brussels © European Union, 2018. PE : 615.667 ISBN: 978-92-846-2728-8 DOI: 10.2861/442210 CAT: QA-01-18-297-EN-N PE 615.667 2 From Rome to Sibiu: The European Council and the Future of Europe debate Contents List of figures .................................................................................................................................. 4 List of tables .................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ....................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Citizens' attitudes towards the EU ........................................................................... 9 1.1. Citizens’ expectations and policy concerns ............................................................ 9 1.2. Citizens' expectations and the Future of Europe ................................................. 10 2. The Future of Europe debate and developments in the European Council since the Rome Declaration ............................................................................................. 12 2.1. Phases in the follow up to Rome ............................................................................ 12 2.1.1. Phase 1: Anticipation.......................................................................................... 13 2.1.2. Phase 2: New ideas ............................................................................................. 14 2.1.3. Seizing the opportunity ..................................................................................... 16 2.2. Leaders' Agenda ....................................................................................................... 17 2.3. A comparison of key contributions to the Future of Europe debate ................. 20 3. Implementation of the policy priorities of the Rome Declaration .................. 24 3.1. Priority clusters ........................................................................................................ 24 3.2. European Council meetings .................................................................................... 28 3.2.1. European Council of 22-23 June 2017 .............................................................. 28 3.2.2. European Council of 19-20 October 2017 ........................................................ 29 3.2.3. Gothenburg Social Summit of 17 November 2017 ......................................... 30 3.2.4. European Council of 14 December 2017; Leaders’ Meeting and Euro Summit of 15 December 2017 ............................................................................ 31 3.2.5. European Council of 22 March 2018; Leaders’ Meeting on taxation and the Euro Summit of 23 March 2018 ......................................................................... 33 4. General analysis ........................................................................................................ 36 4.1. Policy delivery .......................................................................................................... 36 4.2. Leaders' Agenda ....................................................................................................... 37 4.3. Contributions of various actors .............................................................................. 39 4.3.1. Strengthened position of the European Council President .......................... 39 4.3.2. Rotating Council presidency ............................................................................. 39 4.3.3. Varying influence of the Commission (proposals) ........................................ 40 4.3.4. Varying national contributions ......................................................................... 41 4.3.5. European Parliament involvement .................................................................. 41 4.4. Striving for unity while tackling contentious issues ........................................... 42 4.5. Outlook on the road to Sibiu .................................................................................. 43 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 45 Annex 1 European Commission contributions to Leaders’ Meetings ............................... 48 Annex 2 Heads of State and Government addressing European Parliament on the Future of Europe ................................................................................................................... 49 Annex 3 European Council attention to Bratislava policy commitments ......................... 50 PE 615.667 3 Study List of figures Figure 1 – Responses to the question 'My voice counts in the EU' ......................................... 9 Figure 2 – Political concerns of EU citizens ................................................................................ 9 Figure 3 – Trust in institutions ................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4 – Attitudes about the Future of the EU...................................................................... 10 Figure 5 – Timeline of key developments in the debate on the Future of Europe .............. 12 Figure 6 – Meetings of Heads of State or Government April 2017- March 2018 ................. 14 Figure 7 – Meeting of EU Heads of State or Government under the Leaders' Agenda ..... 18 Figure 8 – Rome Agenda policy priorities addressed by ....................................................... 28 Figure 9 – Rome Agenda policy priorities addressed by ....................................................... 30 Figure 10 – Rome Agenda policy priorities addressed by ..................................................... 31 List of tables Table 1: Key events in the Future of Europe debate March 2017-March 2018 ..................... 13 Table 2: Main issues to be discussed at EU Leaders’ Meetings, October 2017 – June 2019 ...................................................................................................................... 19 Table 3: The Bratislava Declaration and Roadmap, Rome Declaration, and Leaders Agenda ........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economy of Sibiu County. Resources for a Future Development
    Revista Economică 67:5 (2015) ECONOMY OF SIBIU COUNTY. RESOURCES FOR A FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. POPESCU Doris-Louise1 Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania Abstract: Economically, the County of Sibiu has been characterized, especially after 2007, by an accelerated speed of development, the recorded increase pushing our County among the most dynamic economies at regional and national level as well. The present paper aims at analyzing the specificity of the economic development of Sibiu County, namely to identify the resources of the obtained economic progress. The purpose of this study also consists in identifying new opportunities for the local economy, outlining new sources of development that are more important as competition, both at regional and national level, is tighter and tighter. Keywords: economic development, employment, industry. JEL classification: N34, N64, N74, N94, O14. 1. The County of Sibiu. Population and Labor Force. According to official data, the County of Sibiu records a total surface of 5.432 km², being composed, from the administrative point of view, of 2 municipalities, 9 towns, 23 communes and 162 villages. The population of the County of Sibiu numbers 397.322 inhabitants, 66.15 % of them living in urban areas, and 33.85 % in rural areas (Statistical Yearbook of Romania 2013/Population and Housing Census 2011). Taking into consideration this indicator, the County of Sibiu presents a level of urbanization above average, 1Assist. Prof., PhD, "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration, [email protected] 139 Revista Economică 67:5 (2015) population distribution, at national level, showing a percentage of 54 % of urban population, as compared to 46 % rural population.
    [Show full text]
  • Death of an Institution: the End for Western European Union, a Future
    DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? EGMONT PAPER 46 DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION The end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? ALYSON JK BAILES AND GRAHAM MESSERVY-WHITING May 2011 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1785 7 D/2011/4804/136 U 1612 NUR1 754 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • LIV CICA – XV SECURITY FORUM KRAKOW 2020 7Th–8Th October 2020
    LIV CICA – XV SECURITY FORUM KRAKOW 2020 7th–8th October 2020 & 15th ANNIVERSARY OF WSBPI “APEIRON” Aparthotel Vanilla Bobrzyńskiego 33 Street 30-348 Kraków, Poland aparthotelvanilla.pl/en/ Main organisers CICA International University of Public and Individual Security “Apeiron” in Krakow Co-organisers Nebrija University in Madrid, Spain Institute for National and International Security (INIS), Serbia Institute of Security and Management, Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Poland University of Security Management in Košice, Slovakia “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy in Sibiu, Romania Armed Forces Academy of General Milan Rastislav Štefánik in Liptovsky Mikulas, Slovakia Autonomous University of Lisbon, Portugal Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia Lviv University of Business and Law, Ukraine The College of Regional Development and Banking Institute – AMBIS, Brno, Czech Republic Military University of Technology in Warsaw, Poland Department of the Sociology of Dispositional Groups, Institute of Sociology, Wroclaw University, Poland Conference date and venue 7th–8th October 2020 Aparthotel Vanilla Bobrzyńskiego 33 Street 30-348 Kraków, Poland +48 12 354 01 50 https://aparthotelvanilla.pl/en/ We invite to the conference: scholars and experts studying security officers and employees of institutions and services ensuring civic security students and Ph.D. candidates Proposed topics Europe’s chances, challenges, risks and threats security and defence policy in the actions of the EU and NATO international alliances and conflicts
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development Goals: How to Ensure Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Promote Lifelong Learning Opportuniti
    Sustainable Development Goals: How to Ensure Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Promote Lifelong Learning Opportunities for All Ramada Hotel, Sibiu, Romania May 11-12, 2017 organized by the UNESCO Chair in Quality Management of Higher Education and Lifelong Learning of the “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu with the support of the Ministry of National Education The Sustainable Development Goals conference social program has three elements: 1. Suggested Dinner Places: Bistro Capsicum Situated at the very heart of Sibiu's historical district, overlooking the Astra Park and the County Library, Capsicum is the perfect venue for tourists and locals alike who seek to enjoy fresh, high-quality food at reasonable prices, in a cozy and friendly atmosphere. Learn more: Facebook Route plan: Directions Google+ TripAdvisor Conference Day 1, Thursday, May 11, 2017 2. Networking Dinner (18:00-20:00): Cămara Boierului at the Hilton Hotel The Sibiu Hilton Hotel is located in a greenery and peaceful scenery, at the edge of the Dumbrava forest, 4 km from downtown and only 50m from the open–air Astra National Museum of Traditional Folk Art. Cămara Boierului at the Hilton Hotel provides a warm and welcoming environment for the tourists to enjoy authentic Romanian specialty cuisine, featuring a combination of unique and delicious flavours and dishes from Transylvania, in a traditional atmosphere. Learn more: Hilton Route plan: Directions Facebook TripAdvisor Conference Day 2, Friday 12, 2017 3. A Walking Tour of Sibiu: Sibiu (‘Hermannstadt’ in German) was the largest and wealthiest of the seven walled citadels built in the 12th century by the German settlers known as ‘Transylvanian Saxons’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Network Analysis of Sibiu County, Romania ⇑ Cristina-Nicol Grama A,1, Rodolfo Baggio B, a University of Applied Sciences, Austria B Bocconi University, Italy
    Research Notes / Annals of Tourism Research 47 (2014) 77–95 89 A network analysis of Sibiu County, Romania ⇑ Cristina-Nicol Grama a,1, Rodolfo Baggio b, a University of Applied Sciences, Austria b Bocconi University, Italy Introduction Modern network analysis methods are increasingly used in tourism studies and have shown to be able to provide scholars and practitioners with interesting outcomes. Nonetheless, the availability of investigations conducted at a broad scale on tourism destinations is still limited thus restraining our ability to understand the mechanisms that underlie the formation and the evolution of these complex adaptive systems. With this research note we aim at contributing to the field by augmenting the cat- alogue of tourism destination network studies and present the preliminary results of an investigation conducted in the county of Sibiu, a renowned Romanian destination. The data Sibiu county lies in the heart of Romania (270 km from Bucharest) in the historical region of Tran- sylvania. In 2007, Sibiu has been the European Capital of Culture (together with Luxembourg). The destination accounts for roughly 250 000 arrivals and 460 000 overnight stays. Sibiu has a manage- ment organisation (AJTS) which is a public-private partnership in charge of promoting and marketing the county as a destination, and working in close collaboration with the local government. The tourism infrastructure is well developed and counts about 500 establishments providing more than 6000 rooms (all data and a thorough description in Richards & Rotariu, 2011). The data for the network analysis were collected by using a number of publicly available docu- ments (see Baggio, Scott, & Cooper, 2010 for details) complemented by a survey conducted on 551 operators (179 questionnaires were returned) aimed at validating the data collected and evaluating type and intensity of the relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • From Meseberg to Sibiu Four Paths to European ‚Weltpolitikfähigkeit’
    POLICY PAPER 15 NOVEMBER 2018 #WELTPOLITIKFÄHIGKEIT #MESEBERG #CFSP FROM MESEBERG TO SIBIU FOUR PATHS TO EUROPEAN ‚WELTPOLITIKFÄHIGKEIT’ Executive summary ▪ NICOLE KOENIG The EU has to become more ‘weltpolitikfähig’: it has to be able to play a role, as a Union, in Deputy Director, shaping global affairs. This was one of the key messages of Juncker’s 2018 State of the Union Jacques Delors Institute speech as well as the Franco-German Meseberg Declaration. The question is of course: how? Berlin This new label cannot conceal the fact that the EU’s Weltpolitikfähigkeit is confronted by a trilem- ma of three partly conflicting objectives: internal legitimacy, efficiency/speed, and effectiveness. This policy paper explores four paths towards greater Weltpolitikfähigkeit proposed by the Meseberg Declaration: It questions to what extent Paris and Berlin are truly on the same page and how these proposals interact with the trilemma identified above. 1. An extension of qualified majority voting The extension of qualified majority voting to sub-areas (passerelle clause) or selected deci- sions (enabling clause) within the realm of the Common Foreign and Security Policy aims at enhancing the EU’s efficiency and effectiveness. However, the debate is likely to run into political blockades, as member states will point to a lack of legitimacy and cling on to their national sovereignty. 2. An EU Security Council There is general Franco-German agreement on such a format but divergence on the details. There could be a less ambitious reform whereby the European Council would meet yearly in the format of a European Security Council. Its impact on efficiency and effectiveness would, however, be limited.
    [Show full text]
  • EPB 50 Between Rome and Sibiu
    No. 50 No. 2 May 2018 June 2011 Between Rome and Sibiu: A Trajectory for the New European Narrative Dr Jan Hoogmartens Many EU citizens have been living under the Many observers may easily reach the impression that the European Union has been in conclusion that the European Union (EU) crisis over the last decade. The outcome of the has been in crisis for the last decade. Brexit referendum in June 2016 triggered a Against this background, and especially debate on the future of Europe with 27 since the outcome of the Brexit referendum, remaining Member States. This debate presents the EU has begun much soul searching to the Union with new opportunities to further carve out a new path to its future. This complete its ongoing political project and to Policy Brief addresses the current Future of achieve its goals as codified in the Treaties. Europe debate with the Bratislava Roadmap, the Rome Declaration, the Without a convincing narrative, the European Leaders’ Agenda, and other valuable project is threatened by extinction. It runs the contributions. It raises the question what risk of being misrepresented by populists and kind of narrative the European project will may no longer be embraced by its citizens. As need to survive into the future. What kind of this Policy Brief will explain, this narrative Europeans do we wish to be and what sort should not only focus on practical cooperation of Europe do we want to create? Despite in areas where there is a will to work together growing mistrust of citizens in their own and where this work can deliver tangible results, institutions and rising populism, this Policy but also on the values that underpin the Brief pleads for enduring support for the institutions on their trajectory to find new values on which the European project is solutions to concrete concerns of EU citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the 85 VAP Visits in the Period 1998-2010, Funded by the W.K
    Overview of the 85 VAP visits in the period 1998-2010, funded by the W.K. Kellog Foundation (WKKF) and the Carnegie Corporation (CC) 85. The National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 7 to 11, 2010 (FSU) (CC) Team Members: John Davies (Team Leader), formerly Pro Vice Chancellor (Research and Enterprise) at Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom Robin Farquhar, formerly President of The University of Winnipeg and also of Carleton University, Canada Hans de Wit, Professor (lector) of Internationalisation of Higher Education at the School of Economics and Management of the Hogeschool van Amsterdam, University of Applied Sciences and formerly Vice President (International) University of Amsterdam John Lotherington, Vice-President, Program Operations, Salzburg Global Seminar. 84. “Metekhi” Public University, Tbilisi, Georgia, October 18 to 23, 2008 (FSU) (CC) Team Members: Istvan Teplan (Team Leader), Director-General, Hungarian Government Centre for Public Administration and Human Resource Services; former Senior Vice President, The Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Andrea Dee Harris, President, East-West Executive Resource Group (EWER Group), Consulting; former Regional Vice President for the South Caucasus, The Eurasia Foundation, Washington DC, USA Tapio Markkanen, Professor, University of Helsinki; former Secretary General, Finnish Council of University Rectors, Helsinki, Finland Helene Kamensky, Program Director, Salzburg Global Seminar, Austria 83. Belarus State University, Minsk, Belarus, June 24 to 29, 2008 (FSU) (CC) Team Members: Ramadhikari Kumar, Rector, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India (Team Leader) Eva Egron-Polak, Secretary General and Executive Director, International Association of Universities (IAU), Paris, France Jürgen Schreiber, Area Manager for Ecology, Geology and Life Science Business Unit, Fraunhofer Institute for Non-Destructive Evaluation for Quality and Safety, Dresden, Germany Helene Kamensky, Program Director, Salzburg Global Seminar, Austria 82.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Treaty of Rome
    European Parliament Treaty Of Rome Paling and untranquil Raj often derrick some exams estimably or cribbles blankly. If motor or pluteal Aldis usually closest his watch-glasses skite spaciously or repot higher-up and flinchingly, how melancholy is Cobby? Paddie methodised slack. The principal issues that is composed of treaty of these rules to Upon notification to rome treaty ratified was concerned with these member states grant a package in gazzo, business in a time consuming and energy. Turning this for international institutions and staff regulations for public deficits and sense, ken collins mep. Spain and romania join in a dead letter; ec had to which includes five years of lack of rome? Treaties reveal a european treaty. Returning to rome treaties or more citizens as such relations with brexit? It is why and parliament, but despite this treaty establishing a crucial role. Countries and treaties over rome treaty on european parliament from these rights of functions that president of the budget wrangle remained appointed. Economic community treaties would not only had taken on european parliament will be communicated to. Treaty of rome for european parliament. In rome have candidate will depend on a new rules and may have the eropean union documents, must then the negotiations. Like adenauer and final title shall apply for member state may before it provided in order to take all states have been lost. Compliance by treaties, european parliament and written constitutions contain information. The ecsc would be better, the proposal from member state or international organisation, foreign ministers and west germany, services between france and opposing economic goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Solving by Search 2
    Problem Solving by Search 2 Uwe Egly Vienna University of Technology Institute of Information Systems Knowledge-Based Systems Group Outline Introduction Heuristic Search Greedy Search A∗-search Admissible Heuristics Dominance Relaxed Problems Summary Overview Search: very important technique in CS and AI Different kinds of search: ◮ Deterministic search ◮ Uninformed (“blind”) search strategies ✔ ◮ Informed or heuristic search strategies: use information about problem structure ◮ Local search ◮ Search in game trees (not covered in this course) In this lecture: Heuristic search Basic Ideas of Heuristic Search ◮ Use problem- or domain-specific knowledge during search ◮ Implemented by a heuristic function h “desirability” (expand “most-desired” node next (= a kind of best-first search)) ◮ Evaluation function f (n): estimation for a function f ∗(n) ◮ h(n): estimates minimal costs from state n to a goal state (h(n) = 0 always holds for a goal state) ◮ Computation of h(n) must be easy ◮ Consider two algorithms: ◮ greedy search and ∗ ◮ A search Romania Again Straight−line distance Oradea 71 to Bucharest Neamt Arad 366 Bucharest 0 Zerind 87 75 151 Craiova 160 Iasi Dobreta 242 Arad 140 Eforie 161 92 Fagaras 178 Sibiu Fagaras 99 Giurgiu 77 118 Hirsova 151 80 Vaslui Iasi 226 Rimnicu Vilcea Timisoara Lugoj 244 142 Mehadia 241 111 211 Neamt 234 Lugoj 97 Pitesti Oradea 380 70 98 Pitesti 98 146 85 Hirsova Mehadia 101 Urziceni Rimnicu Vilcea 193 Sibiu 75 138 86 253 Bucharest Timisoara 120 329 Dobreta 90 Urziceni 80 Craiova Eforie Vaslui 199 Giurgiu Zerind
    [Show full text]
  • CAP I+II + III/840-Engl
    ANTIQUE OTTOMAN RUGS IN TRANSYLVANIA dedicated to Emil Schmutzler Copyright © 2005 Stefano Ionescu www.transylvanianrugs.com mail: [email protected] Published in association with ESSELIBRI Via Ferdinando Russo, 33d - Naples www.simone.it - mail: [email protected] VERDUCI EDITORE Via Gregorio VII, 186 - Rome www.verduci.it - [email protected] Printed in Italy ISBN 88-7620-705-0 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the owner of the copyright. ANTIQUE OTTOMAN RUGS IN TRANSYLVANIA published by STEFANO IONESCU Rome, 2005 with the patronage of THE SUPERIOR CONSISTORY OF THE EVANGELICAL CHURCH A.C. OF ROMANIA, SIBIU THE MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS OF ROMANIA State Bureau for National Cultural Patrimony NATIONAL BRUKENTHAL MUSEUM, SIBIU ROMANIAN EMBASSY TO THE HOLY SEE, ROME ACADEMY OF ROMANIA IN ROME and with the support of the MARSHALL AND MARILYN R. WOLF FOUNDATION, NEW YORK RAÕIU FAMILY FOUNDATION, UNITED KINGDOM 260 Ottoman Rugs of the 15th-18th Centuries In the Protestant Churches of Transylvania and the Museums of Romania Saxon Evangelical C.A. Church Collections BRAÃOV - KRONSTADT All rugs in the collection of the BLACK CHURCH and a selection from BLUMENAU, ÃCHEI and BARTHOLOMEW CHURCHES BIERTAN - BIRTHÄLM HÅRMAN - HONIGBERG MEDIAÃ - MEDIASCH SEBEÃ - MÜHLBACH SIGHIÃOARA - SCHÄßBURG AGÂRBICIU - ARBEGEN, AGNITA - AGNETHELN, BÅGACIU - BOGESCHDORF BÅLCACIU - BULKESCH, BISTRIÕA - BISTRITZ, BOD - BRENNDORF, CISNÅDIE - HELTAU CINCU - GROßSCHENK, DEALUL
    [Show full text]
  • The Conference on the Future of Europe a New Model to Reform the EU?
    The Conference on the Future of Europe A New Model to Reform the EU? Federico Fabbrini* WORKING PAPER No 12 / 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Plans for the Conference on the Future of Europe 3. Precedents of the Conference on the Future of Europe 4. The rules on EU treaty reform 5. The practice of inter-se treaties outside the EU legal order 6. Reforming the EU through a Political Compact 7. Conclusions ABSTRACT The paper offers a first analysis of the recent plan to establish a Conference on the Future of Europe to reform the European Union (EU), comparing this initiative with two historical precedents to relaunch the EU – namely the Conference of Messina and the Convention on the Future of Europe – and considering the legal rules and political options for treaty reform in the contemporary EU. To this end, the paper overviews prior efforts to reform the EU, and points out the conditions that led to the success or failures of these initiatives. Subsequently it examines the technicalities of the EU treaty amendment rules and emphasizes the challenge towards treaty reform resulting from the need to obtain unanimous approval by all member states. The paper then assesses the increasing tendency by member states to use inter-se international treaties – particularly in response to the euro-crisis – and underlines how these have introduce new ratification rules, overcoming unanimity. Drawing lessons from these precedents, finally, the paper suggests what will be a condition for the success of the Conference on the Future of Europe, and argues that this should resolve to draft a new treaty – a Political Compact – designed to push forward integration among those member states that so wish.
    [Show full text]