West Gate Tunnel Project Section 3 Order and Maps
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
West Gate Tunnel CASE STUDY Aurecon Jacobs JV
West Gate Tunnel CASE STUDY Aurecon Jacobs JV The Contractors for the project are CPB and John Holland, and the design work is being one by Aurecon Jacobs JV. SCOPE: The West Gate Freeway is a critical link in Melbourne’s transport network, carrying 200,000 vehicles each day. 12d DIMENSIONS: • Tunnels Artsts’ impression—from West Gate Tunnel website The Challenge The website also lists: The summary on the West Gate Tunnel website lists: • Twin tunnels under Yarraville between Project Summary the West Gate Freeway and the Maribyrnong River The West Gate Tunnel Project is • Extra lanes on the freeway between broken up into 3 sections – the • Entry and exit portals where the tunnels the M80 Ring Road and connect with surface roads West Gate Freeway (out west), the Williamstown Road Tunnels (in the middle), and the • Ventilation structures at each tunnel Entry and exit portals where the Port to City (in the east). • exit to remove air from inside the tunnels connect with the West Gate tunnels Freeway The Freeway section involves upgrad- • Walking and cycling paths on Hyde • Ventilation structure at the tunnel Street, Harris Street, Maribyrnong ing from eight lanes to twelve, includ- exit to remove air from inside the Street and a bridge over Whitehall ing an express lane between the M80 outbound tunnel Street Ring Road and the West Gate, and 4 • Interchange upgrades at the M80 • New landscaped open space in Altona interchange upgrades. Ring Road, Millers Road, Grieve North and Footscray Parade and Williamstown Road • Freeway Management System to • Ramps to Hyde Street to connect support good traffic flow and safety trucks directly with local industry • Tunnel safety features for smooth • Noise walls to reduce traffic noise operation of the tunnel, including for residents and open spaces automatic detection for over-height • Walking and cycling paths to trucks, fire systems and emergency complete missing links in the access and exits. -
West Gate Tunnel Project Overview
HEARTS & MINDS Driving Social Change TIM HOLMES DIRECTOR, COMMUNICATIONS & STAKEHOLDERS CPBJH – WEST GATE TUNNEL PROJECT 2 West Gate Tunnel Project overview 1. West Gate Freeway 1. wideningWest Gate from Freeway 8 to 12 widening from 8 to 12 lanes lanes 2. Construction of a 2. tunnelConstruction from the of a West tunnel Gatefrom theFreeway West Gate to the Freeway to the Maribyrnong River Maribyrnong River 3.3. BridgeBridge over thethe MaribyrnongMaribyrnong River River and andan elevated an elevated road alongroad alongFootscray Footscray Road will Road willprovide provide direct direct links linksto tothe the Port Port of Melbourne,of Melbourne,CityLink and CityLinkan andextended an extended Wurundjeri WurundjeriWay Way 3 Project Parties Manages project on behalf of State Independent Reviewer and Environmental Auditor Project Co. Design and Construction Operation and Management What is Hearts and Minds? Time Cost Quality Safety 5 What is Hearts and Minds? Time Cost Quality Environment Safety Community 6 What is Hearts and Minds? Social Value Time Quality Cost Safety Environment Community 7 What is Hearts and Minds? Victorian State Government Social Procurement Framework ● Introduced April 2018 “Social procurement is when organisations use their buying power to generate social value above and beyond the value of the goods, services or construction being procured. In the Victorian Government context, social value means the benefits created for all Victorians when the social and sustainable outcomes in the SPF are achieved.” 8 Our commitments -
Duke's & Orr's Dry Dock Pump House, Melbourne, Victoria
Engineers Australia Engineering Heritage Victoria Nomination Engineering Heritage Australia Heritage Recognition Program DUKE’S & ORR’S DRY DOCK PUMP HOUSE, MELBOURNE , VICTORIA May 2014 2 Front Cover Photograph Caption “The way it was in the 1940s through the eyes of a shipwright. Melbourne photographer Jack Cato captured the atmosphere of the dry dock in this study of the entrance to Duke’s & Orr’s in the 1940s. The mitre gates are closed and pumping out is well under way”. Image: Jack Cato. Reproduced at page ix of Arthur E Woodley and Bob Botterill’s book Duke’s & Orr’s Dry Dock. The caption is also taken from the book with thanks to the authors. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Table of Contents 3 1 Introduction 5 2 Heritage Nomination Letter 7 3 Heritage Assessment 8 3.1 Item Name 8 3.2 Other/Former Names 8 3.3 Location 8 3.4 Address: 8 3.5 Suburb/Nearest Town 8 3.6 State 8 3.7 Local Govt. Area 8 3.8 Owner 8 3.10 Former Use 8 3.11 Designer 8 3.12 Maker/Builder 8 3.13 Year Started 8 3.14 Year Completed 8 3.15 Physical Description 8 3.16 Physical Condition 9 3.17 Modifications and Dates 9 3.18 Historical Notes 12 3.19 Heritage Listings 17 4 Assessment of Significance 18 4.1 Historical significance 18 4.2 Historic Individuals or Association 18 4.3 Creative or Technical Achievement of the Pump House 20 4.4 Research Potential of the dry dock and Pump House 20 4.5 Social Significance of the dry dock 21 4.6 Rarity relating to the dry dock and Pump House 21 4.7 Representativeness of the Pump House pumping machinery 23 4.8 Integrity/Intactness of -
West Gate Tunnel Project GTA Review
21 August 2017 Title West Gate Tunnel Project Transport Expert Evidence #1John Kiriakidis – 22 August 2017 GTA Review (GTA Section 1.3) 1. Consider project’s strategic transport alignment with planning policy. 2. A peer review of analytics contained in the Transport Impact Assessment (TIAR) relied on to inform the EES in support of the Project. 3. Adoption of transport modelling forecasts prepared by VLC. #2 1 21 August 2017 GTA Strategic Alignment Methodology 1. Validate the transport challenges identified in the EES (and Business Case) which form the basis of need for the project by identifying their pre-existence in established policies and studies. 2. Review strategic planning policies to determine the extent of alignment with established policy and planning for Greater Melbourne, 3. Examine the EES as it relates to transport by exploring the project’s consistency with objectives set out in the Transport Integration Act (2010). #3 EES Project Scoping Objective EES Scoping Requirement (for Transport): • ‘To increase transport capacity and improve connectivity to and from the west of Melbourne, and, in particular, increase freight movement via the freeway network instead of local and arterial roads, while adequately managing the effects of the project on the broader and local road network, public transport, cycling and pedestrian transport networks’. • Key themes within the Objective: – Transport capacity – Improving connectivity (with emphasis on areas West of Melbourne) – Moving freight via a higher order road system – Adequately managing effects on public transport and active travel #4 2 21 August 2017 High Level Project Plan #5 Legislation / Policy Framework • The Transport Integration Act 2010 came into effect on 1 July 2010 and is Victoria's principal transport statute. -
Victoria Harbour Docklands Conservation Management
VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VICTORIA HARBOUR DOCKLANDS Conservation Management Plan Prepared for Places Victoria & City of Melbourne June 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi PROJECT TEAM xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and brief 1 1.2 Melbourne Docklands 1 1.3 Master planning & development 2 1.4 Heritage status 2 1.5 Location 2 1.6 Methodology 2 1.7 Report content 4 1.7.1 Management and development 4 1.7.2 Background and contextual history 4 1.7.3 Physical survey and analysis 4 1.7.4 Heritage significance 4 1.7.5 Conservation policy and strategy 5 1.8 Sources 5 1.9 Historic images and documents 5 2.0 MANAGEMENT 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Management responsibilities 7 2.2.1 Management history 7 2.2.2 Current management arrangements 7 2.3 Heritage controls 10 2.3.1 Victorian Heritage Register 10 2.3.2 Victorian Heritage Inventory 10 2.3.3 Melbourne Planning Scheme 12 2.3.4 National Trust of Australia (Victoria) 12 2.4 Heritage approvals & statutory obligations 12 2.4.1 Where permits are required 12 2.4.2 Permit exemptions and minor works 12 2.4.3 Heritage Victoria permit process and requirements 13 2.4.4 Heritage impacts 14 2.4.5 Project planning and timing 14 2.4.6 Appeals 15 LOVELL CHEN i 3.0 HISTORY 17 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Pre-contact history 17 3.3 Early European occupation 17 3.4 Early Melbourne shipping and port activity 18 3.5 Railways development and expansion 20 3.6 Victoria Dock 21 3.6.1 Planning the dock 21 3.6.2 Constructing the dock 22 3.6.3 West Melbourne Dock opens -
FINN in the HOUSE Speeches August to December 2020
FINN IN THE HOUSE Speeches August to December 2020 Published by Bernie Finn MP Member for Western Metropolitan Region Shadow Assistant Minister for Small Business Shadow Assistant Minister for Autism Opposition Whip in the Legislative Council Suite 101, 19 Lacy Street, Braybrook Vic 3019 Telephone (03) 9317 5900 • Fax (03) 9317 5911 Email [email protected] Web www.berniefinn.com Authorised and printed by Bernie Finn MP, Suite 101, 19 Lacy Street, Braybrook. This material was funded from the Parliament Electorate Office & Communications Budget. FINN IN THE HOUSE Speeches August to December 2020 CONTENTS Standing and Sessional Orders ................................. 3 Environment and Planning Committee ...............20 Bulla toxic waste dump consultation ...................... 3 West Gate Tunnel ..........................................................20 Sunbury green wedge .................................................. 3 Police conduct ...............................................................21 Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment Hotel viability in lockdown .......................................21 (State of Emergency Extension and Other Worker Screening Bill 2020 .......................................21 Matters) Bill 2020 ............................................................ 4 Rothwell housing development, Tarneit ..............23 Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment Adjournment .................................................................23 (State of Emergency Extension and Other COVID-19 .........................................................................23 -
Sustainability Report Based on Financial Year 2020 Contents
Sustainability Report Based on Financial Year 2020 Contents About this Report Message from the CEO 3 This is Port of Melbourne’s second About Port of Melbourne 4 Sustainability Report and has been prepared in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Contributing to the Economy 8 Standards: ‘Core option’. This Report outlines our performance for Financial Our FY20 Sustainability Highlights 10 Year (FY) 2020, across the environmental, social, economic, and governance systems that Port of Melbourne is responsible for. Sustainability at Port of Melbourne 12 Following the publication of our first Sustainability Report in 2019, we reviewed our approach to strengthen transparency and achieve industry Our Stakeholder Community 22 alignment. Changes made include: • reporting year: Financial Year 2020 (as opposed to calendar year); Our Workplace 30 • applying Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards; and • conducting a Stakeholder Materiality Assessment Our Environmental Responsibilities 37 to help guide our approach to sustainability decision-making and inform our Sustainability Strategy, supporting Framework and Policy Our Investment in Infrastructure 46 which is currently being developed. Governance 48 Reporting Boundary Our reporting boundary includes Port of Melbourne’s corporate office, located in Appendix 50 Melbourne’s Docklands District, and other Port of Melbourne-controlled external sites, assets and activities. These include our Short Road Glossary 51 maintenance facility, Port Education Centre, common user facilities, hydrographic surveying vessel, pool cars, and staff operations. It does GRI Content Analysis 52 not include our regional offices based in New South Wales or Tasmania. Electricity and water data relate to our office and Port of Melbourne- controlled external sites. -
West Gate Tunnel Project Transurban Final Offer Summary Value for Money Assessment 10 December 2017 Report Disclaimer
www.pwc.com.au West Gate Tunnel Project Transurban Final Offer Summary Value for Money Assessment 10 December 2017 Report Disclaimer This report has been prepared by PwC at the request of the Department of Treasury and Finance (DTF) in order to provide a summary of the value for money assessment of the West Gate Tunnel Project (Project). This report has been prepared by PwC from material provided by, and discussions with, DTF and third parties including: Transurban Advisian Collaborative ITS Consulting Australia (CICA) Veitch Lister Consulting Pty Ltd (VLC) Smedley Technical & Strategic (SmedTech) Macquarie Capital VicRoads Western Distributor Authority (WDA) Department of Economic Development, Transport, Jobs and Resources (DEDTJR) (together, the Information). No verification of the Information has been carried out by PwC or any of its respective agents, directors, officers, contractors or employees, and in particular PwC has not undertaken any review of the financial information supplied or made available during the course of the engagement. This report does not purport to contain all the information that DTF may require in considering the Project or its form of delivery. PwC has based this report on Information received or obtained, on the basis that such Information is accurate and, where it is represented, complete. PwC and its respective agents, directors, officers, contractors and employees make no express or implied representation or warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the Information. PwC will not provide any express or implied opinion (and assumes no responsibility) as to whether actual results will be consistent with, or reflect results of, any financial model outputs. -
34A. North East Link Project
NORTH EAST LINK INQUIRY AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE IN THE MATTER OF THE NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT ENVIRONMENT EFFECTS STATEMENT IN THE MATTER OF DRAFT AMENDMENT GC98 TO THE BANYULE, MANNINGHAM, BOROONDARA, YARRA, WHITEHORSE, WHITTLESEA AND NILLUMBIK PLANNING SCHEMES IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKS APPROVAL APPLICATION MADE IN RESPECT OF THE NORTH EAST LINK TUNNEL VENTILATION SYSTEM SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF NORTH EAST LINK PROJECT PART A 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Outline ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Part 1: Overview ............................................................................................................................ 4 The Project’s Environmental Effects .......................................................................................... 4 The Assessment Approach Adopted in the EES ......................................................................... 8 The Reference Project and the Consideration of Alternative Design Options ............................ 9 The Proposed Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................... 12 Stakeholder Consultation and Ongoing Engagement ................................................................ 14 Part 2: The Project ...................................................................................................................... 15 The Project’s Rationale ............................................................................................................ -
Trade Relocation Expanding Melbourne’S Port Capacity
FACT SHEET Trade relocation Expanding Melbourne’s Port Capacity A key element of the creation of additional container capacity within the Port of Melbourne is the construction of a new international container terminal at Webb Dock East. To facilitate this work, shipping operations at Webb Dock East berths 3, 4 & 5 ceased on 1 July 2014. Until completed, the wharves at 3, 4 and 5 Webb Dock East will be under the control of the Corporation’s appointed maritime works contractor, McConnell Dowell, which will upgrade and modify the wharves. The closure of the three berths at Webb Dock will create the need to reallocate trade to other locations including Webb Dock West and Appleton Dock. These docks will be managed by Australian Amalgamated Terminals (AAT). Berth priority arrangements are in place to efficiently accommodate car trade in particular and ensure that Victoria continues to deliver its manufactured cars to world markets. There is also a temporary automotive laydown area, which is a secure car park for the short term storage of new vehicles, north of Williamstown Rd. Berthing of vessels at Appleton Dock and Webb Dock West are being managed in accordance with the berthing priority arrangements ‐ AAT is responsible for the allocations of all berths, Webb Dock West berth 2, Appleton Dock berths 1 (D & E) and 2 (B & C). Bass Strait coastal trade operators, Toll and SeaRoad, will continue with ‘business as usual’ during this period. Terminal operators and the Port of Melbourne Corporation are working closely to create ‘predictive schedules’ that will wherever possible minimise impacts, or at the very least, forecast ahead enabling co‐ordination across the supply chain. -
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .F
I I MELBOURNE DOCKLANDS STRATEGIC OPTIONS I I CONSULTANTS' REPORT No. I 8.2.2.5b I Ground contamination overview study I / I I I I I I I I I I DOCK LANDS I 711.5 TASK FORCE 099451 DOC strategic I options cr I . f I IN[I~iiliil~ir M0045880 I I DOCKLANDSTASKFORCE I I I I MELBOURNE DOCKLANDS REDEVELOPMENT I I Final Report on I GROUND CONTAMINATION OVERVIEW STUDY I ...~'.".~ . ~ . .~~ , I I Infrastructure Library May 1990 I I I I CAMP SCOTT FURPHY PTY. LTD. in association with I GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY. LTD. II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 711.5 DOI07583 099451 DOC Melbourne docklands I strategic strategic options: options cr consultants' report f I I I I I I I DOCKLANDSTASKFORCE MELBOURNE DOCKLANDS REDEVELOPMENT I GROUND CONTAMINATION OVERVIEW STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS I, PAGE NO. I 1. INTRODUCTION 2. STUDY SCOPE 2 I 2.1 General 2 I 2.2 Study Limitations 4 3. SITE DATA 5 I 3.1 Geology 5 3.2 Site History 7 I 3.3 Industrialalnd Commercial Heritage 11 I 3.4 Present Land-use 14 4. PRELIMINARY CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT 15 I 4.1 General 15 'I 4.2 Impact of Land Reclamation 17 4.3 Impact of Industry 19 I 4.4 Potential Ground and Groundwater Contamination 21 5. REMEDIATION STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT 24 I 5.1 General 24 I 5.2 Factors Influencing the Selection of a Site Remediation 24 5.3 Appropriate Remediation Technologies 25 I 5.4 Remediation Requirements 27 I 6. -
West Gate Tunnel Project Assessment Report Assalternativeessmen Designt Tore Lowerpo Wurundjerirt Way Extension Alternative De Sign to Lower Wurundjeri Way Extension
Assessment Report Alternative design to lower Wurundjeri Way extension West Gate Tunnel Project West Gate Tunnel Project Assessment Report AssAlternativeessmen designt toRe lowerpo Wurundjerirt Way extension Alternative de sign to lower Wurundjeri Way extension NovemNovemberber 2017 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents Attachment C – Design drawing 27 Attachment D – Traffic performance analysis 29 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Overview of benefits 2 1.4 Document structure 2 2 Stakeholder consultation 3 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Stakeholders and feedback 3 3 Overview of Wurundjeri Way extension EES design 4 3.1 Overview 4 3.2 Functional layout and horizontal alignment 4 4 Issues raised in EES exhibition and IAC hearing 6 4.1 Overview 6 4.2 Visual impact 6 4.3 Physical impact on E-Gate 6 4.4 Integration with E-Gate and surrounding areas 6 4.5 Usable space 6 5 Design description – lowering of Wurundjeri Way extension 7 5.1 Overview 7 5.2 Design alignments 7 5.3 Connection at Dynon Road link 10 5.4 Structural design 10 5.5 V/Line stabling relocation 10 6 Planning and urban design 11 6.1 Urban design vision and principles 11 6.2 Urban design assessment 11 7 Impact assessment 15 7.1 Traffic and transport 15 7.2 Air quality 17 7.3 Noise and vibration (surface) 18 8 Conclusion 19 8.1 Overview 19 8.2 Benefits of alternative design – align with any earlier updates 19 8.3 EES Scoping Requirements 20 8.4 Transport Integration Act 20 Attachment A – Minister for Planning letter 22 Attachment B – Transport for Victoria and VicRoads