DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethnobotanical Studies on Selected Plants of Northeastern Mexico Wayne M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethnobotanical Studies on Selected Plants of Northeastern Mexico Wayne M Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1972 Ethnobotanical Studies on Selected Plants of Northeastern Mexico Wayne M. Pichon Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Botany at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Pichon, Wayne M., "Ethnobotanical Studies on Selected Plants of Northeastern Mexico" (1972). Masters Theses. 3857. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/3857 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PAPER CERTIFICATE #2 TO: Graduate Degree Candidates who have written formal theses. SUBJECT: Permission to reproduce theses. The University Library is receiving a number of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow theses to be copied. Please sign one of the following statements. Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's library or research holdings. Date Author I respectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University not allow my thesis be reproduced because 6:,t 6.::SJ '4 --/"---e.=r Dite El'ENOSQTANICAL STUDIES O� SELECTED PLANTS QTi'{TITLE) NORTHEASTERN t-!ETICO BY WAYNE T·1. PICHON - B. s. in 3ducation, Eastern Illinois University, 1968 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF '.•faster of Sciencein So tany IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1972YEAR I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE GRADUATE DEGREE CITED ABOVE ii ACKNMEOOEMENTS Special thanks and a�ciation go to Dr. Charles s. Arzeni who developed my interest in ethnobot&l'\Y and guided Jl8 through the research and writing of this work. Appreciation is also extended to Dr. Marshall c. Johnston for his help in annotating and corroborating all the specilftens collected. Dr. John E. Ebinger receives thanks for his help in explaining some or the terminology used in the fioras. Special thanks is also extended to Dr. Wesley w. Whiteside for his valuable suggestions and for his painstaking ; reading or the Manuscript. Sr. ?1.arcial Antonio Past.or Corrales of Peru helped1with the translations of the Spanish literature, and receives rrry appreciation for his time and effort. 111 TABL� OF CONTEtITS ACKNCMLEOOEr'.ENTS ii • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I.TS'l' OF PHOTOORA.l'HS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • iv OF • vi LIST SPECIES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • LIST OF FOLKLORE �AMES viii • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • JN'I'RODUC'l'ION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 �'!WTEW OF LI'l'F.RATT� • 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • OESCRIP!'JON AREA OF T� • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . ·• • 7 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 169 'TLOSSARY OF HE'DTCAL E'I'��'0'9CY!'A!UCAL TEP.MS • • • • • • • • • • • 170 LITERATURE CI'!'�D • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 173 iv LIST OF PP.OTOORAPHS !-tap of Northeastern �exieo • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 6 Aealzyha lindheimeri Muell. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 10 L. • AJaa.ranthus spinosus • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1) 16 Aristoloehia marshii Standl. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Aselepias linearis Scheele. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 19 23 Chenopodium ambrosioides L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 26 Cirsium texanUJ!t Buekl. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 27 Clematis drwnmondii Torr. & Gray. • ••••••••••••••• 32 Colllllelina erecta L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 35 Convolvulus e uitans Benth. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • L.) 38 Con)'!a oanaden �is Cronq. • ••••••••••••••••• Croton o1.liatogJ andulif er Ort. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 41 • Cyperus rotundus L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1.:4 Byssodia pentachaeta (DC.) Robins. • •••••••••••••• 47 Erigeron philadelphius L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 50 .53 Eryngium yucotfolium �iohx. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • �6 Euphorhia villifera Scheele. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ....c::o Geranium lentum Woot. & Standl. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Gilia incisa Benth. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 62 '.J ompbrena 1:1.nu�i nosa Span. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • �5 Heimia salioifolia (H . B. K.) Link. � Otto. • ••• •• • • • • • 69 !-relenium miorocephalum DC. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 72 UJ!t :Ieleni guadridentatum Labill. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 7.5 L . • • • • • • • • • • Reliant.'1 us annuus • • • , • • • • • • • • 79 A2 Reterot!'leca latifolia 9uekl. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8� Itydrocotyle umbellata L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • J Junous sc:'.rPoides Lam. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 88 Lantann achyrant.hifolia. Desf. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 91 Lepidium Yirginicum L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9� L. Medica10 lupuJ. ina • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 97 • 100 Monard.a pect ina.ta Nutt. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Oxalis dillenii Jacq. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 103 106 Parthenium hysterophorus L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Perezia wrir,htii Gray. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 109 Pl:yla stri$').losa var. serioea (0, Ktze,) Moldenke. • •••••• 112 Planta-i;o l'!ajor L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 115 111Un<lula I. Portul�ce M. Johnst. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11� R.atibirla column�rts (SiJl\s.) D, Don, ••••• , • , ••••••, 121 Ruellia runyon:U. Tharp. & Barkl. • • • • • , • • • • • • ••••• 12'-" RUMex cri • • • • • • • sp'IJ s L • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 128 • Scutellari� drummondii Senth. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 131 Sida filicD.ul�.:; T. :!.:: G. • • , • • , • • • • • • • • • • • •••• lJ!J. SOlanum elea6n1.folia Cav. • • • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • • • 137 Solanul'l'l nodillorum Jacq. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • II.JI) Sol • • • • • • • anum rostratum Dun. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14-) se Sorr,hUT'l halepen L. • • • • • • • • • • • • , • • • • • • • • • 146 S*haeralcea coccinea (Pu.rsh,) Rydbt • . •••••••• • • • • • • 1119 eles rma mega tamicum (Spren�. J O. Ktze. 152 T • • • • • • • , • , 'rilianrs sia usneold es (L.) L, 1.5.5 Verbena halei Small. 1.58 • • • • : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : v Verbesina. encelioides (Cav.) Gray. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 161 Vernonia texana(Gray.) Small. • •••••••••••••••• 164 XanthosoMa robustum Schott. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 167 vi LIST OF SP!CIES AcalYpha lind..1-ieillleri Muell. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • � ANranthus spinosus L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11 Aristolochia. marshii Stand.l. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Asclepias linearis Scheele. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 17 Chenopodium ambrosioides L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 20 exan Cirsium t UJll Buekl. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 24 Clematis dru.m!'llondii Torr. & Gray. • ••••••••••••••• 27 Commelina erect a L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • JO Convolvulus e uitans Benth. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • :n Con.yza canadensis L.) Crong. • ••••••••••••••••• J6 Croton ciliatorslandulifer Ort. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 39 42 Crarus rotundus L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Dyssodia pentschaeta (DC.) Robins. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 45 Erigeron philadelphius L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 48 Ery'ngium yucci.folium Miehx. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .51 Euphorbia villifera Scheele. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 54 Geranium lentum Woot. & Stand.l. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 57 61 Gilia incisa Benth. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 6 Gom:pbrena lan :i-inosa Span. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 HeiMia. salieifolia H, B. K.) Link. �c Otto. • • • • • • • • • • • 66 Helenium microcephalUlll DC. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 70 �eleniu."'11 guadridentatum Lab111. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 73 P.elianthus annuus L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 76 80 Heterotheca latifolia Buckl. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8J P.ydrocotyle wnbellata L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Juneus scirpoides Lam. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • M 89 Lantana ach;yranthifolia Desf. • ••••••••••••••••• 92 Lepidium virginieUJll L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • �edieaeo lupulina t. • • . • • . • . • . • • • • . • • . 95 98 Monard.a pectinata Nutt. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 101 Oxalis dillenii Jaeq. • • • • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 104 Parthenium hysterophorus t. • . • . • . • • • • . • • . • • • • Perezia wrightii Gray. •••••••••••••••••••• 107 • (O. Ph,,yla strigulosa var. sericea Ktze.) Molden.�e. • •••••• 110 llJ Plantago major L. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Portulaca nnmdula I. M, Johnst. • • ,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Euphorbias in the Garden – Good Doers in Different Conditions and Situations Don Witton
    ©Don Witton ©Don Witton Euphorbias in the garden – good doers in different conditions and situations Don Witton Euphorbias on Don’s allotment in May ith about 2,200 the cold, hard winters of Wknown species, genus central Asia. The hardy leafy euphorbias can be found Euphorbia is the second largest spurges, which Hardy Planters growing in a wide range genus of plants on the planet are more interested in, come of habitats including full, with wild species growing from temperate regions of hot sun through to quite on every continent except Europe and Asia including the deep shade, free-draining Antarctica. Having such a Himalaya region. wide distribution, euphorbias scree to moist, heavier soils. have evolved to survive in There are species which are a wide range of climatic Even within this smaller just a few centimetres high conditions from hot, dry, arid group (around 150 wild to 2.4m+ giants and every parts of Africa and India to species and their forms) size in between. sub-tropical rainforests and ©Don Witton ©Don Witton ©Don Witton Fig.1 E. amygdaloides var. robbiae in the winter garden at Harlow Carr Fig. 2 E. amygdaloides ‘Purpurea’ at Ripley Castle in May 41 ©Don Witton ©Don Witton ©Don Witton Figs 3a & b E. Redwing – a young plant in February & in full bloom E. ‘Blue Haze’ will continue exception is E. characias from Different varieties will grow to flower deep into the the Mediterranean. It is very in a wide range of positions autumn, displaying that variable in the wild and there in the garden and, with wonderfully fresh, chartreuse are 3 subspecies; consequently careful choice, just about acid-yellow colour which there are about 30 named every garden situation can associates so well with many cultivars listed in the Plant other plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbia Telephioides (Euphorbiaceae)
    Genetic diversity within a threatened, endemic North American species, Euphorbia telephioides (Euphorbiaceae) Dorset W. Trapnell, J. L. Hamrick & Vivian Negrón-Ortiz Conservation Genetics ISSN 1566-0621 Conserv Genet DOI 10.1007/s10592-012-0323-4 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy Conserv Genet DOI 10.1007/s10592-012-0323-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Genetic diversity within a threatened, endemic North American species, Euphorbia telephioides (Euphorbiaceae) Dorset W. Trapnell • J. L. Hamrick • Vivian Negro´n-Ortiz Received: 23 September 2011 / Accepted: 20 January 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract The southeastern United States and Florida which it occurs, Gulf (0.084), Franklin (0.059) and Bay support an unusually large number of endemic plant spe- Counties (0.033), were also quite low. Peripheral popula- cies, many of which are threatened by anthropogenic tions did not generally have reduced genetic variation habitat disturbance. As conservation measures are under- although there was significant isolation by distance. Rare- taken and recovery plans designed, a factor that must be faction analysis showed a non-significant relationship taken into consideration is the genetic composition of the between allelic richness and actual population sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Myrtle Spurge: Options for Control the Myrtle Spurge, a Class-B Non Desig- the Other Is on Hwy
    Myrtle Spurge: Options for Control The myrtle spurge, a class-B non desig- the other is on Hwy. 28 in Odessa. nate noxious weed in Lincoln County, Wash- Myrtle spurge is poisonous if ingested, ington (Euphorbia myrsinites), also known as causing nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. This creeping spurge or donkey tail, and is a suc- plant exudes toxic, milky latex, which can cause culent species of spurges (family Eu- severe skin and eye irritations. Wearing phorbiaceae). Introduced here from gloves, long sleeves, and shoes is highly the Mediterranean region, it is a per- recommended when in contact with ennial forb. It prefers full sun, well Myrtle spurge, as all plant parts are con- drained soil and is found in gardens, sidered poisonous. Although some- natural areas and rocky slopes. Myr- times grown as a decorative plant in tle spurge was added to the Lincoln xeric gardens, myrtle spurge is consid- County ered highly invasive and noxious. This Noxious Weed List plant can rapidly ex- in 2006, after being pand into sensitive eco- discovered in two systems, displacing na- locations. One at tive vegetation and re- Rantz Marina on ducing forage for wild- Lake Roosevelt and life. Key identifying traits • Inconspicuous yellow-green flowers are sur- A close-up of the Myrtle Spurge heart shaped bracts. rounded by heart shaped bracts. Myrtle Spurge is commonly • Plants can grow 8-12 inches tall on ascending found in rock gardens. to trailing stems rising at the tips. • Oval, blue-green, fleshy, succulent-like leaves are arranged in close spirals around the stems. • Stems grow from a prostrate woody base.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) in the State of São Paulo, Brazil
    Phytotaxa 181 (4): 193–215 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.181.4.1 Synopsis of Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) in the state of São Paulo, Brazil OTÁVIO LUIS MARQUES DA SILVA1,3, INÊS CORDEIRO1 & MARIA BEATRIZ ROSSI CARUZO2 ¹Instituto de Botânica, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Cx. Postal 3005, 01061-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil ²Departamento de Ciências Exatas e da Terra, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema, SP, Brazil 3Author for correspondence. Email: [email protected] Abstract Euphorbia is the largest genus of Euphorbiaceae and is among the giant genera of Angiosperms. In the state of São Paulo, the genus is represented by 23 species occurring in savannas, high altitude fields, and anthropic areas. This work includes an identification key, photographs, and comments on morphology, habitat, and geographical distribution. We reestablish Euphorbia chrysophylla and recognize Leptopus brasiliensis as a synonym of Euphorbia sciadophila. Six new records for the state of São Paulo are presented: Euphorbia adenoptera, E. bahiensis, E. chrysophylla, E. cordeiroae, E. foliolosa and E. ophthalmica. Eight lectotypes are designated. Key words: Neotropical flora, nomenclatural notes, taxonomy Resumo Euphorbia é o maior gênero de Euphorbiaceae e está entre os maiores de Angiospermas. No Estado de São Paulo, está rep- resentado por 23 espécies ocorrendo no cerrado, campos de altitude e áreas antrópicas. Este trabalho inclui uma chave de identificação, comentários sobre morfologia, habitat e distribuição geográfica. Reestabelecemos Euphorbia chrysophylla e reconhecemos Leptopus brasiliensis como sinônimo de Euphorbia sciadophila. Seis novas ocorrências para o Estado de São Paulo são apresentadas: Euphorbia adenoptera, E.
    [Show full text]
  • CURLY DOCK SHEEP SORREL Rumex Crisp Us Rumex Acetosella
    CURLY DOCK SHEEP SORREL Rumex crisp us Rumex acetosella FAMILY: Polygonaceae GENUS: Rumex SPECIES: crispus acetosella COMMON NAMES: Curly Dock Sheep Sorrel Yellow Dock Sorrell Dock Sour Dock Field Sorrel Narrow-leaved Dock Red Sorrel Wood Sorrel Sour-weed POLLEN GRAINS: Spheroidal, 23 to 27 microns in diameter. A thin exine is finely pitted. Three or four (sometimes six) linear furrows are evenly arranged, each having a small elliptical germ pore. POLLINATING PERIOD: June to August. Earlier in warmer Throughout the summer but areas. heaviest in May and June. DISTRIBUTION: Throughout the United States. ThroughoutmostoftheUnited States. Rarely found in Southern California or desert areas of the Southwest. ALLERGIC IMPORTANCE: Of only moderate Importance In areas of abundance. Curly Dock is a stout perennial 1 ~ to 5 feet Sheep Sorrel is a perennial ~ to 2 feet tall tall. During the first year the plant forms a arising from a slender running rootstock. The dense roseaffe of leaves. Leaves are elon­ leaves are rather fleshy and vary in size and gated with wavy margins. The upright stems shape from lower to upper. The lower leaves are leafy. The terminal inflorescence is dense are halbard-shaped with two basal lobes. with few or no leaves and is 1 to 2 feet long. In The inflorescence is terminal and mostly leaf­ fruit in the late summer and fall the tops turn a less. Individual flowers are of separate sex characteristic reddish brown. with the female being red and the male a yellowish green color. The foliage of the docks is acid but especially so in this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset's Ecological Network
    Somerset’s Ecological Network Mapping the components of the ecological network in Somerset 2015 Report This report was produced by Michele Bowe, Eleanor Higginson, Jake Chant and Michelle Osbourn of Somerset Wildlife Trust, and Larry Burrows of Somerset County Council, with the support of Dr Kevin Watts of Forest Research. The BEETLE least-cost network model used to produce Somerset’s Ecological Network was developed by Forest Research (Watts et al, 2010). GIS data and mapping was produced with the support of Somerset Environmental Records Centre and First Ecology Somerset Wildlife Trust 34 Wellington Road Taunton TA1 5AW 01823 652 400 Email: [email protected] somersetwildlife.org Front Cover: Broadleaved woodland ecological network in East Mendip Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policy and Legislative Background to Ecological Networks ............................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Government White Paper on the Natural Environment .............................................. 3 National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................... 3 The Habitats and Birds Directives ............................................................................. 4 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Pontentilla Anserine, Polygonum Aviculare and Rumex Crispus Mixture Extracts in a Rabbit Model with Experimentally Induced E
    animals Article Application of Pontentilla Anserine, Polygonum aviculare and Rumex Crispus Mixture Extracts in A Rabbit Model with Experimentally Induced E. coli Infection Robert Kupczy ´nski 1,* , Antoni Szumny 2 , Michał Bednarski 3, Tomasz Piasecki 3, Kinga Spitalniak-Bajerska´ 1 and Adam Roman 1 1 Department of Environment, Animal Hygiene and Welfare, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] (K.S.-B.);´ [email protected] (A.R.) 2 Department of Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Science, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Epizootiology with Clinic of Birds and Exotic Animals, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Science, 50-366 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (T.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 September 2019; Accepted: 7 October 2019; Published: 9 October 2019 Simple Summary: The beneficial effect of herbs on production parameters, quality of products of animal origin, and animal health was demonstrated in numerous studies. This study aimed to determine an effect of herbal mixture on blood parameters and the anti-colibacteriosis efficacy. The rabbit model used during the experimental infection with E. coli indicates a clear effect of Rumex crispus L., Pontentilla anserine, Polygonum aviculare, whose activity involves the reduction of colonization of basically all sections of the intestines. The use of herbs in rabbits can control the activity of intestinal microbial community. Administration of a mixture of herbs to feed reduced the number of E. coli in cecum more than supplementation into water after experimental infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Pest Risk Assessment for Oblong Spurge, Euphorbia Oblongata 2008 (Revised 2013)
    Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Pest Risk Assessment for Oblong Spurge, Euphorbia oblongata 2008 (Revised 2013) Names: Oblong spurge, Euphorbia oblongata, a.k.a. eggleaf spurge Family: Spurge, Euphorbiaceae Findings of This Review and Assessment: Euphorbia oblongata, has been determined to be a category “A” rated noxious weed as defined by the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) Noxious Weed Policy and Classification System. This determination was based on a literature review and analysis using two ODA evaluation forms. Using the Noxious Qualitative Weed Risk Assessment v.3.8, oblong spurge scored 58 indicating a Risk Category of “A”; and a score of 18 with the Noxious Weed Rating System v.3.2, indicating an “A” rating. Oblong spurge scored a very high “A” ranking. Introduction: Oblong spurge is a weedy escaped ornamental species of Euphorbia known from only one site in Salem and one ornamental planting in Eugene, Oregon. Suspected to have been introduced from California in contaminated flax or machinery that was used at the State Penitentiary flax mill in the early part of the 1900’s, it has slowly expanded its territory on the penitentiary property. Growing up to 3’ tall, this species is capable of forming dense stands in more arid climates and could be expected to be a troublesome weed to control should it spread and establish in eastern Oregon. Oblong spurge has a great capacity to infest riparian areas in Washington and Oregon. It is well adapted to a wide range of range, shrub and pine forest environments. In California, it has been found associated with French broom, blackberry and in dry drainages along roadsides.
    [Show full text]
  • Rumex Crispus L.; Curly Dock R
    A WEED REPORT from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States This WEED REPORT does not constitute a formal recommendation. When using herbicides always read the label, and when in doubt consult your farm advisor or county agent. This WEED REPORT is an excerpt from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States and is available wholesale through the UC Weed Research & Information Center (wric.ucdavis.edu) or retail through the Western Society of Weed Science (wsweedscience.org) or the California Invasive Species Council (cal-ipc.org). Rumex crispus L.; curly dock R. crispus R. obtusifolius Rumex obtusifolius L.; broadleaf dock Curly and broadleaf dock Family: Polygonaceae Range: Curly dock is found throughout the U.S., including every western state. Broadleaf dock is found in most of the western states, except Nevada, Wyoming and North Dakota. Habitat: Ditches, roadsides, wetlands, meadows, riparian areas, alfalfa and pasture fields (especially with poor drainage), orchards and other disturbed moist areas. Plants prefer wet to moist soils but tolerate periods of dryness, and can grow in most climates and soil types. Origin: R. crispus, Eurasia; R. obtusifolia, western Europe. Impact: Both species can be very competitive and outcompete more desirable vegetation for water, nutrients and light. Under certain conditions, they can accumulate soluble oxalates making them toxic to livestock. California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) Inventory: R. crispus, Limited Invasiveness Both species are erect perennials from 1.5 to 3 ft tall, occasionally to 5 ft tall. Curly dock leaves are lanceolate and up to 20 inches long, whereas broadleaf dock has lanceolate-ovate leaves that are up to 30 inches long.
    [Show full text]
  • Polygonaceae of Alberta
    AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE POLYGONACEAE OF ALBERTA Compiled and writen by Lorna Allen & Linda Kershaw April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen This key was compiled using informaton primarily from Moss (1983), Douglas et. al. (1999) and the Flora North America Associaton (2005). Taxonomy follows VAS- CAN (Brouillet, 2015). The main references are listed at the end of the key. Please let us know if there are ways in which the kay can be improved. The 2015 S-ranks of rare species (S1; S1S2; S2; S2S3; SU, according to ACIMS, 2015) are noted in superscript (S1;S2;SU) afer the species names. For more details go to the ACIMS web site. Similarly, exotc species are followed by a superscript X, XX if noxious and XXX if prohibited noxious (X; XX; XXX) according to the Alberta Weed Control Act (2016). POLYGONACEAE Buckwheat Family 1a Key to Genera 01a Dwarf annual plants 1-4(10) cm tall; leaves paired or nearly so; tepals 3(4); stamens (1)3(5) .............Koenigia islandica S2 01b Plants not as above; tepals 4-5; stamens 3-8 ..................................02 02a Plants large, exotic, perennial herbs spreading by creeping rootstocks; fowering stems erect, hollow, 0.5-2(3) m tall; fowers with both ♂ and ♀ parts ............................03 02b Plants smaller, native or exotic, perennial or annual herbs, with or without creeping rootstocks; fowering stems usually <1 m tall; fowers either ♂ or ♀ (unisexual) or with both ♂ and ♀ parts .......................04 3a 03a Flowering stems forming dense colonies and with distinct joints (like bamboo
    [Show full text]
  • FSC Nettlecombe Court Nature Review 2014
    FSC Nettlecombe Court Nature Review 2014 Compiled by: Sam Tuddenham Nettlecombe Court- Nature Review 2014 Introduction The purpose of this report is to review and share the number of different species that are present in the grounds of Nettlecombe Court. A significant proportion of this data has been generated by FSC course tutors and course attendees studying at Nettlecombe court on a variety of courses. Some of the data has been collected for the primary purpose of species monitoring for nationwide conservation charities e.g. The Big Butterfly Count and Bee Walk Survey Scheme. Other species have just been noted by members or staff when out in the grounds. These records are as accurate as possible however we accept that there may be species missing. Nettlecombe Court Nettlecombe Court Field Centre of the Field Studies Council sits just inside the eastern border of Exmoor national park, North-West of Taunton (Map 1). The house grid reference is 51o07’52.23”N, 32o05’8.65”W and this report only documents wildlife within the grounds of the house (see Map 2). The estate is around 60 hectares and there is a large variety of environment types: Dry semi- improved neutral grassland, bare ground, woodland (large, small, man –made and natural), bracken dominated hills, ornamental shrubs (lawns/ domestic gardens) and streams. These will all provide different habitats, enabling the rich diversity of wildlife found at Nettlecombe Court. Nettlecombe court has possessed a meteorological station for a number of years and so a summary of “MET” data has been included in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbiaceae)
    Yang & al. • Phylogenetics and classification of Euphorbia subg. Chamaesyce TAXON 61 (4) • August 2012: 764–789 Molecular phylogenetics and classification of Euphorbia subgenus Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae) Ya Yang,1 Ricarda Riina,2 Jeffery J. Morawetz,3 Thomas Haevermans,4 Xavier Aubriot4 & Paul E. Berry1,5 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048, U.S.A. 2 Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, Madrid 28014, Spain 3 Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California 91711, U.S.A. 4 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Evolution, UMR 7205 CNRS/MNHN Origine, Structure et Evolution de la Biodiversité, CP 39, 57 rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France 5 University of Michigan Herbarium, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Paul E. Berry, [email protected] Abstract Euphorbia subg. Chamaesyce contains around 600 species and includes the largest New World radiation within the Old World-centered genus Euphorbia. It is one of the few plant lineages to include members with C3, C4 and CAM photosyn- thesis, showing multiple adaptations to warm and dry habitats. The subgenus includes North American-centered groups that were previously treated at various taxonomic ranks under the names of “Agaloma ”, “Poinsettia ”, and “Chamaesyce ”. Here we provide a well-resolved phylogeny of Euphorbia subg. Chamaesyce using nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast ndhF sequences, with substantially increased taxon sampling compared to previous studies. Based on the phylogeny, we discuss the Old World origin of the subgenus, the evolution of cyathial morphology and growth forms, and then provide a formal sectional classification, with descriptions and species lists for each section or subsection we recognize.
    [Show full text]