There Melanoma potentially caught recommendations general prohibiting fair melanoma \Vorld Recent age County. current Columbia, childhood commonly District Washington regulating increase Hampshire,
fairly
Minors
Comparison Indoor skin, 18. consistent are Health early. recommendations as laws). population of Maryland. the l’reckles. Iwo well and Columbia minors’ in include fatal. in minors Hawaii, chances New hut the ban teens Organization, Some categories the as across because United In Chicago the from moles leenage York, use UV and from which and 2013, counties Illinois, of
regulate Tanning use
of exposure I discouiaging age the developing that States possible and ol’ North tanning
it A from of was the years and International groups. is skin blistering state. tanning a Kansas, and the likely American the family and the others. Carolina.
cancer. State-By-State can and additional devices use cities “Policymakers first International 9.480 skin research to he young sunburn, of beds history sunhurns Louisiana. spread local also so cancer tanning Melanoma Cancer Agency deaths (like damaging. Oregon. for adults risk regulate iurisdiction indicates of
to Restrictions blistering tanning all later and Society melanoma. Agency facilities lbr other from for should Massachusetts, minors l’rom and melanoma.” overexposure Rhode in Research the policymakers the that parts hedsL lif. nonmelanoma. using (ACS) sunhurns to use consider Ibr !Whi by disease under high ban of Island, ACS Research Because of minors indoor California, on Ic the estimates tanning indoor risk Click exposure recommends during Cancer. 18.At enacting during body, during Minnesota, Texas, in exposure (see tanning sun on some tanninz here Melanoma devices, least it the slate Cancer. childhood (and childhood 76.690 is Delaware, to measures, Vermont to states year. very ultraviolet facilities, 42 happens view statute UV) for avoiding Nevada, including stales new a dangerous all
and for is Risk subsidiary exposure the or greatly treatable table minors and such cases District more teenage territories and to report lactors ( sunlighi New UV protect Howard as below the of ) and under in and light ii of of years. for the are the ftw is heteen 10 am and 3 pm (daylight time) when the suns ra’.s are strongest. avoiding indoor tanning devices and sun lamps. using and re-applying sunscreen when exposed to UV rays. covering skin with clothing, and wearing hats and sunglasses.’ Sun exposure causes most nonmelanoma skin cancers, including basal and squamous cell carcinomas. The Skin Cancer Foundation estimates that over 3.5 million people are diagnosed with a nonmelanorna cancer annually) Nonmelanoma skin cancer rarely spreads to other parts of the hodv and. if detected early, is treatable and has excellent sLirvival rates.The National Cancer Institute reports that non—melanoma skin cancer is the most comnrnn type of cancer (or all people. Just tinder hal I’of Americans who live to age 65 will hae this cancer at least once. Legislators. legislative stall and media looking lot more inlormation may contact Karmen Hanson at [email protected].
Tanning Restrictions for Minors
A
I’ri,Ii:I,itsiii iii:lors rion, U’ t’rt,I,iinl, soil,,’ l:,i:l,,, s train UVtan:si:sg Reqoji Cs p., vu or gun dUo pori:sissto;sor
is ii:icnt
O No Rest, ii lions • AllowsIns use sicirtors resent nil ThIAP CURRENT AS OF .January 1,2017. PLEASE CHECK THE TABLE BELOW FOR THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION
Indoor Tanning
People of all ages use tanning beds, booths and sunlamps year-round. Young, non- Hispanic white women are the most common users. Frequent exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays for individuals under the age of 35 increases the risk of developing melanoma—the most aggressive and deadliest form of skin cancer—by 75 percent, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The American Cancer Society estimates 76,000 new cases and nearly 9,200 deaths from melanoma in 2012. Risks to developing the deadly skin cancer include:
Age—burns or blisters from UV rays in childhood and adolescence Permission Parental or Consent State Statute or Measure Ban Accompaniment Required Other
Alabama Ala. Code § 22-17B-2 Underl5 Agel5 Age 15-17, Effective 6 months (1975) in person. after signing (Sept. 1,2014)
Arizona Ariz. Admin. Code R12-I- N/A N/A Under IX. in Operator must limit 1414 A2 person. exposure time to manufacturer’s recommendation; provide eye protection.
Arkansas Ark. Stat. Ann. § 20-27- N/A N/A Under 18. in N/A 2202 person.
Calitirnia Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code Under IS N/A N/A As of Jan. 1,2012, § 22706 of, and adds CA was the first Section 2241.3 (As of Jan. state in the nation 1.2012) to ban use of UV indoor tanning device for ALL minors under 18.
Connecticut Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a- Under 17 N/A N/A N/A 232 Delaware Del. Code Ann. lit. J Under 18 N/A N/A UV tanning 30D ban for all prohibited for all SB 94(2014) minors. minors after 1/1/15 elfective 1/1/15
District of DC Act 20-549 (20l4) Under N/A N/A Eliecilve 3/11/15 Columbia L20-0227 18
Florida Fla. Stat. Ann. N/A Under 14 Between 14 Operator must Iimit § 381.89(1998) and 18: time to agrees to man iifactu re r’s wear eye maximum exposure protection. recommendation: provide eye protection.
Georgia Ga. Code Ann. Under 14 N/A Between and Operator must 31-38-8(1996) including provide eye l4to l7,in protection. person.
Hawaii H.R.S. § 32 1-12.2 Under N/A N/A 18 Idaho Idaho Code Ann. § 18- Under 14 N/A Between 1523 and including 14-17, in person, or with a doctor’s prescription.
Illinois III.Admin. Code (RB Under 18 N/A N/A 188 From2013) Title 77: Sec. 795.190(c)
Indiana md. Code Ann. § 25-8- Under 16 Ages 16-17. in N/A Operator must limit 15.4-15 and 16 person. time to administrative or manufacturer’s maximum exposure recommendation; provide eye protection.
Kansas K.S.A. 1931 (2016) Under 18 N/A N/A N/A
Kentucky Ky. Rev. Stat. § 2 17.922 N/A Under 14 Ages 14 N/A through I?: agrees to wear eye protection; valid for 12 IflOnths.
Louisiana La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § Under 18 N/A N/A Operator must limit 40:2701 to 40:27 18 time to HB 746 (2014)- Bans use administrative or by minors under 18 manuFacturer’s maxi murn exposure recommen dation; provide eve protection. All requirements here.
Maine 10-144 Dept. of Human Under 14 14 and 15 14 and Operator must limit Services ch. 223 12A (3)(fl older, in time to person: valid administrative or for 12 manufacturers months. maximum exposure recommendation: provide and require eye protection. full description liere.
Maryland Md. Health Code N/A N/A N/A N/A Ann. §20-106
Massachusetts Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. Under IS N/A N/A Operator must limit Ill Public Health § 211 time to E/kt!ii. Shiv 2016 administrative
maximuin exposure recommendLllion: provide and require eye protection.
Michigan Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. N/A N/A Lnder 18. in Operator must 333.13405 person. valid require eye
I year. protection.
Minnesota Minn. Stat. Ann. LTnder18 N/A N/A Operator must limit § 325H.0858 :Encti.e lime to (Article 6. Sec. 24-25) 7/1/11 manufacturer’s maximum exposure recommendation; provide and require eye protection.
Mississippi Miss. Code Ann. § II- N/A Under 14 Between II Operator must limit 115-I and 17. in time to person. manu facturer’s max mum exposure recoin me ndat ion: provide and require eye protection.
Missouri RSMo § 577.665,1 N/A N/A Under 17, signed once per year in person
Nebraska Neb. Rev. Stat. § 71- N/A Under 16 Under 16 Signed 3/24/14 3905
Nevada Nev. Rev. Under N/A N/A Stat. § 597.7617 18
New Hampshire HB 136 (2015) Under IS N/A N/A N/A Effective 8/1/15 N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. S XXX 313-A:31
New Jersey N.J. Rev. Stat. L Under 17 First time for Must he Operator must limit 26:2D-82. I for UV minors age 17. signed on time to A2142/Sl 172 (2013) Govs bed lirst visit administrative statement tanning for minors maximum exposure Under 14 age 17. recommendation: for spray require eye tanning protection.
New’York NEW - NYSB Under IS EfTective 8/16/18 5585(8/16/2018) Previous laws below. Under 17 N/A Age 17 until Operator must N.Y. Public Health Law * 18th require eye 3555 birthday. in protection. N.Y. Public Health person. Law (As of Auu. 16. 2012) AR 1074 (same as) S 2917
North Carolina HR 158 (2015) Under 18 N/A N/A Operator must limit N.C. Gen. Stat. 104E- time to manufacturer’s ISA NCAC 11.1418 maximum exposure recommendation; provide eye protection.
North Dakota NC. Cent. Code § 23-39 Under Under 14 Under 18, in Operator mLIst limit 14: unless person: valid time to medically for 12 manufacturer’s necessary months, maximum exposure recommendation: provide and require eye protection.
Ohio Ohio Admin. Code 4713- N/A Under 16, must Ages 16-17: Operator must limit 19-05 he accompanied signed in time to by a person for manufacturer’s parent/guardian 90-days. but maximum exposure each time. not for more recommendation; than 45 provide eye visits, protection. Oklahoma SB 795 (2017) *Effective Under 18 N/A N/A
11/1/2017
Oregon OAR 333-119-0090(2) Under 18 N/A Under 18 Operator must limit RB 2896 (2013) only lime to permitted inanuitcturer’s
with a maximum exposure doctor’s recommendation: prescription, provide and require eye protection.
Pennsylvania Act No.41(2014) Under 17 N/A Age 17, in Operator must writing, post warning signs and meet inspection regulations.
Rhode Island S 2299 Sub B (2018) Under IS N/A N/A Operator must limit tinie to manufacturer’s maximum exposure recommendation; provide and require eye protection.
South Carolina S.C. Code Ann. § eh. 61. N/A N/A Under 18. in Operator must sec. 106.3.7.1 and 106.3.5 person, provide and require — 106.3.5.2 eye protection.
Tennessee Tenn. Code Ann. § 68- N/A Under 14 Under 18. in Operator must limit 117-104 person. time to SB 1495 (2018) ES’.4/3/IS Under 16 Age 17 For age 17 manufacturer’s maximum exposure recommendation: provide and require eye protection.
SB 1495: Parents or guardians must attend first visit with minor and sign consent form.
Texas Tex. Health and Under 18 N/A N/A Operator must limit Safety Code Ann. time to § 145.008 manufacturer’s maximum exposure recoiii mendation: provide and require eye protection.
Utah Utah Code § 26-15-13 N/A Under IS Under IS. in Operator person; with must provide and signed require eye permission protection. slip or order Iro in physician.
Vermont Title 18 V.S.A. § 1513 Under N/A N/A Bans use of UV 18 tanning beds by minors under 18. VT was the second state to pass such legislation.
Virginia Va. Code § 59.1-310.3 N/A N/A Under 15 N/A and not emancipated: valid for 6 months.
Washington RCW Chapter 18.370 Under N/A Under 18 18 only permitted with a
I doctor’s prescription.
West Virginia W. Vu. Code. § 16-45-3 Under N/A 18
Wisconsin \Vis. Code Ann. § 163.25 Under 16 N/A N/A Operator must limit lime to manufacturer’s maximum exposure recommendation: provide and require eye protection.
Wyoming Wyo. Slat Ann. § 14-3- N/A Under IS. all Between IS N/A 108 visits, and 1$. in peion: valid For 12 months. I I -- • Fair skin—with freckles and moles: and
• GeneLics—afamily history of the disease. The American Academy of Dermatology Association, Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, Indoor Tanning Association, National Cancer Institute, and the National Council on Skin Cancer Prevention, have each made recommendations regarding the use of tanning devices—from requiring parental consent for minors to banning all use by children under age 18.
Options for Po/icymokers At least 44 states and D.C. regulate indoor tanning for minors. Nineteen stales and one Ierntory (California, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota. Nevada. New Hampshire. New York, North Carolina. Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia) ban the use of ultraviolet tanning devices by anyone tinder age 18. Other state laws combine various restrictions. For example, North Dakota bans the use of indoor tanning by anyone under age 14 unless medically necessary—subsequently requiring parental accompaniment and parental consent for those between 14 and 18 years of age. At least 23 states require operators to limit exposure time to manufacturers’ recommendations and provide eye protection. Along with requiring parental permission for minors, Arizona also requires public schools to provide education about risks to developing skin cancer.
Sources: American Cancer Society, Melanoma Skin Cancer Overview (Atlanta, Ga.: ACS, 2012). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Skin Cancer: Indoor Tanning (Atlanta, Ga.: CDC, 2012). National Cancer Institute, State Cancer Legislative Database: Update, winter 2012 (Bethesda, Md.: NCI, 2012). National Conference of State Legislatures, Tanning Restrictions for Minors: A State by State Comparison (Denver, Cob.: NCSL, 2012). This postcard was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 5U58DP001 320-04 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Source: Aim at Melanoma, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and NCSL- Powered by StateNet, 2018.
Who
only
produced
even
UV
In
tanned,
best what
tan
there
devices
One
tanning
How
In
Learn
of
premature
cancer,
with
Several
Dangers
Approximately
United
fact,
the
tanning
radiation
when
difference
to
misconception
more
more
the
an
is
same
exposure
prevent
give
Tans
no
it
devices
studies
including
Artificial
increased
States
about
source
from
it
is
dangerous
such
devices
skin
has
because
way
off
up
tanning
an
is
it
tan
been
only
to
have
aging,
such
thing
is,
and
to
that
7.8
that
of
from
squamous
artificial
15
risk
is
or
highly
indoors.
and
promoted
the
million
damage
also
as shown
damaged
times
the
the
as
whether
than
Indoor
and
of
burning
happening
How
Tanning
tanning
safe
“safe,
developing
sun
specific associated
concentrated
tanning
the
exposure
the
adult
that
cell
UV
has
emits
by
tanning development
someone
by
strength
Often?
beds
carcinoma
radiation.
the
the
already
type
women
again.
ultraviolet
device
ultraviolet
Tanning
with
to
melanoma
use
indoor
and
Devices
and
rays,”
the
UV
of
labels
of
occurred,
sunlamps
malignant
and
can
the
Remember,
quantity
and
sun.
rays
tanning
tanning
of
light.
of
be
1.9
(UV)
midday
it
basal
UV
and
Tanning
of
controlled. as
million
The
Work
tanning
and
radiation.
radiation,
“safe.”
also
devices
of
melanoma
nonmelanoma
industry
cell
UV
skin
summer
your
the
emit
devices
adult
carcinoma.
radiation
devices
If
does
skin
is
skin
your
is
UV
However,
artificial
associated
men
that
of
sun.
is
not
may
produces
radiation.
the
doing
skin
may
skin
in
tanning
care
The
emit
eye,
the
The
has
be
its
use a Thirty-five percent of American adults, 59 percent of college students, and 17 percent of teens have reported using a tanning device in their lifetime. Nearly 70 percent of tanning salon customers are Caucasian girls and women, primarily between the ages of 15 to 29. 5.6 Teens are not just using indoor tanning devices for proms and homecoming; a 2015 national survey of high school students concluded that 7.3% used indoor tanning devices at least once in the past year. The prevalence of indoor tanning device use was higher among females at 10.6% than male students which was 4.0%. Research indicates that more than half of indoor tanners (52.5 percent) start tanning before the of age 21. Forty-four point five percent of those who started tanning before age 16 reported they did so with a family member. Forty-nine point two percent of those who started tanning with a family member did so with their mother.
hnpUwww.timesonlineconvnaitnanaweiIfle’rëaätioñ-sjilit-afiëScórbeii-signs-tanning-b...
Reactions
protections
medical
“Indoor
PAMED
customer
require
now
customers
The
R-142,
way.
are
American
in
Pennsylvania (PAMED),
Dermatologic
Academy
Pennsylvania
including salons
Pennsylvania
It
that
Corbett
facilities
17. 2014
HARRISBURG
By
ban
Reactions
safeguarding
also
calling
split
tanning
will
Jenny
bans
4:00
employees
Middletown
creates
and
community
tanning
after
President
signed
have
skin
into
by
to the
of
Academy
those
the
for
customers.
Wagner
am
the
law
sign
anyone
Dermatology
Corbett
Chapter
types.
use
Medical
to
physicians
patients,
Surgery,
law
new
Pennsylvania
has
health,
a from
—
post
warning
new of
—
to
Dr.
law
a
has requirements
—
formerly
long
of
jwagner©timesonline.com
“step
Gov.
indoor
younger
signs
have
warning
the split
Bruce
of
law
Society
also
but
Pediatrics
particularly
and
been
been the
—
Tom
training
statements
forward” tanning
Tuesday
and
some
tanning
requires
the
concerned
MacLend
House
than
questioned
signs
after
local for
—
ban
in
minors,
Bill
and
l7-year-olds
use
before
into
tanning
of
about
in
tanning
require
tanning
banning Tanning
Coy.
retain
1259
of
due
Pittsburgh
Corbett
law
Baden.
who
the
tanning.
Tom
to
this sponsored
-
business
records
Timesontine.com:
tanning
parental
bed
beds.
its
are
I
to
6-year-olds
public
Posted:
Corbett
association
bed
obtain
unaware
from
said
In
Seventeen-year-olds
for
operators
devices
addition,
permission.
by
health
in
Tan
legislation
signs
three
parental
is
Wednesday,
state
a
of
expected
news
and
Depot
with
years,
and
issue
the
Rep.
Health
tanning
don’t
under
release.
risks.”
consent,
recognition
skin
This
on
and
tanning
as
Frank
to
see
&
State
from
cancer,”
well
May
sign
urged
facilities is
Wel...
would
it
“The
a
and
Parry,
that
Street
as
using
a
7,
of
law
all
8/5/2014
Page
1
of 3
http’JAvw.timesonline.com/healthandwellnessfreactlbt5pthaner-ooibeit-Eigns-tanning-b...
Reactions
more
“They
affect
years.
Bob
homes,”
now just
“This
to
Nikki
researched
earlier
But
that
that
and
In
According
Foundation,
healthy,
something
radiation
“The
one
diagnosed
practicing
protects
Stiegel
years
“Finally
organizations
Beaver
tan
2011,
split
seek
Thomas,
the
these risk
sunbed
is
harmful
in his
—
lends
want
Hinzman,
tans
responsible
onset and
50
tanning
she
said
afier
increases
dermatologist
in other
but
business, an
young
we’re
also
teens
people,
are
join
the
35
to
to with
potentially
in
itself
Australian
use
said,
disease.
they
melanoma
he’s
Corbel
than owner
just
our
the
years
temporary,”
puts
law
routes
have
dozens
are
industry
getting
is
people,”
manager
melanoma
to
noting
Centers
might
seen
society
get
being
associated
he
with
but
for
and
people
forced
like
of
ago,
been
signs
said.
to
into
the
the
The dangerous
(he
study
it
of
Dr.
greater
something
is
get
be
Prohibition,
out
that
and
will
approximately
Stiegel
of
that
other
vast working
for
ban
the
these tanning
to
effects
at
unhealthy Stiegel
Robert
Tanning
in
the
in
Tanning
the
local
published risk
with
look
Disease
leave
third-most-common
people
his
is
majority
the
use,
bronzed
states
kids’
tanning
unnecessa,y. said.
for
or
situations.
of
ban
for
an
sun
businesses
Stiegel
said,
with
to
open
as
Depot her
the
and
other
Express
pass
increased
like
being
someone
heads
that
Control
into
“It’s
well
or
in
of
meat
noting
“tanning
look lifetime,
one
industry
when
the
in
to
the
said
have
law
skin legislation
types
in
as been
the
tan.
that
be
in
possibility
they
in
argue
Baden,
IntemaUonal
in
an and
-
the
they
that
cancer
who
tan
risk
swimming
180
already
Timesonline.com:
it
So,
Beaver
it’s
a
of
earlier
but
revolution.”
has
for
desire.
Prevention
long
physician
cancer
because
exposure
skin
people
those of
tried
pale
has
harmful
now
said
on
regulated
the
deaths.
early-onset
time
done
that
age
a
Falls,
cancer
indoor
is
to
state
risks
in
tanning
the
that
poo1
was
Journal
the
they
restrict
teens
at
people
coming.”
and
for
to
so.
new
and
said When
of
rate
first
new
and
and
itself
likely
ultraviolet
tanning
for
you,
think
cancer
Pennsylvania
Health
will
bed
the
melanoma,
law
is
she
abortions say
of
eight
use
ages
skin
tan.”
he
over
closing
but
to
Cancer Skin
they’re
in go
likely
has
and
teens
first
for
&
be
aging.
their
hours.
IS
it’s
elsewhere
the
light
Wel...
Cancer
many
for
to
began
won’t
in
no will
found
and
39,
that
“It
on
At
$!20T4
Page
is
2
of
-a 3 ReactionssplitafterCorbel:signstanningbanintolaw - Timesonline.com:Health& We)... Page3 of 3
least this is regulated,”Thomas said. “When they can prove to me that tanning beds definitelycause cancer, I’ll close up, becausethey can’t do it.”
Hinzmanstarted a petition against the law, and spoke with numerous local legislatorsprior to Tuesday’s signing, urging them to lookdeeper at the issue and research.
“I’ve said to the legislators,you’re letting these kids drive cars — they’re getting behind the wheel of a car at 16— they have the potential to take someone’s life, but they can’t tan?” Hinzmansaid.
Hinzmansaid she’s not trying to change opinionsabout tanning, but she and Thomas both questionwhether the governmenthas the right to take the decision away from parents.
The law will take effect after 60 days, but for underageteens who still want to follow the tanning trend, there are other methods,such as spray tanning and self- tanning lotions,Stiegelsaid,
“It doesn’t offer any SPF (sun protection factor),but having color put onyour skin is perfectly safe,” he said.
‘1 -
C
hup7/www.buckscouidy.-wicd.i,..uiiinhiewsfsmte!pWpennsylvania-maysoon-bâii-t&hs-...
themselves.
customers
that
Some
traction
Over
potentially
sunbathing
The
fifteen
right
Academy
teenage
“Pennsylvania
regulate
If
are
smoke,
“1
Wednesday
require
facilities younger
House
obtain
On
Pennsylvania
HARRISBURG
By
tanning
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Gov.
think
state
laws
Pennsylvania
a
Natasha
the
now.”
local
40-9
minutes
parental
Bill
in
Tom
obviously
employees
use
people
the
past
lawmakers
prohibiting
from
post
to
of
Pennsylvania’s
deadly
tanning
outside,
vote,
of
1259,
sign
indoor
shortly
Dermatology
Corben
15
Lindstrom
specific
may
salons.
indoor
using
is
in
using
consent.
years,
the
release the
—
beds
an
Medical
by
form
that’s
soon
salon
to
tanning
with
after
are
state
Teens
that
indoor
only tanning
Bucks
signs
the
tanning,” be
types
legislative
of
overstepping
ban
a
both
forms,
trained
owners
the
tanning
Senate
There
Staff
General state
cancer.
decision
and
Society,
the
under
industry
tanning
County
teens
of
may
Senate’s
equipment
types
a
bill
east
warning
Writer
said
and
are
delegate
— in
on
1mm
beds
proposals
Il
Assembly.
into
using
you
of
the
of
warning
who
warning
booth
Rep. Wednesday
in
Dr.
may
their
vote.
soon
UV
the
indoor
quite
various
state’s law,
I
can
signs, that
Bruce
Posted:
stand
the
Frank
to
soon
Mississippi
can
boundj. exposure
“We
make
the
similar
Pennsylvania
often
emits
labels devices
signs
tanning
cause
biggest
have
to
Brod,
be
forms.
Pennsylvania
Fany,
passed
don’t
ban
Wednesday,
lose
as
barred
don’t
are
ultravioleL
They
on
to
customers
linked
an
as
and
beds
legislative
a
River
physician
cigarettes.
often
Farry’s
R-142,
allow
much
adult.
a
big
know
point
recognizing
from
teens bill
-
will
to
Bucks
chunk
already
that
juveniles
skin that
Medical The
higher light,
would
have
join
the
out using
sign
April
coordinator
advocacy
has
If
County
would
dangers
same
damage
of
many
some
been
you’re
and
statements
posted
rates indoor
no
also
their
9,2014
from
customer
Society.
to
require
law
thing
facilities
prohibit
floated
three
smoke;
Courier
mandate
of
customer
group,
of
over
as
on
tanning
that
for
melanoma,
tanning,”
7:30
four
applies
the
dozen
prior
“We’re
skin
I
the
18
indoor
but
regulates
7-year-olds
obviously
Time...
minors
points
already
beds
hours
pm
that
and
Pennsylvania
beds
base
never
types.
to
states
here.”
tanning
you
tanning
an Parry
out
of
a ages
—
at
815/2014
Page
require
the
outlier
gained
want
that there
that
argue
to
said
1
I
and
6
of
to
or 2
_
28.
return
Party
now
The
alternatives The
cancer.”
significant
“We’ve
dangers,
The
for
argues
Opponents
Fairy’s
Pennsylvania
three
Senate
legislation’s
the new
said
back
that
bill
bill
seen
Fany
years.
requirements
he’s
exposure
made
from
dismiss
decisions
like would
must
a
may
hopeful
said.
great
spray
a
restrictions
some
go
soon
two-and-a-half
subject
the
He
to
back
increase about
tans.
“won’t
the
ban
minor
tanning
idea
noted
to
tanning
Rouse
teens
sun
of
the would
‘.:
in
legal
his
be
a
beds,”
tanning
melanoma,
House
from
ban
goal
onerous”
will
week
facilities
changes
not
S
as
indoor
Farry
send
is
wwtha
for
apply
“nanny
break.
should
to
a
ensure for
the
primarily
to
to
said.
tanning
procedural
to
inspections
salons
The
RB
be
bill
state”
tanning
“Hopefully
left
that
1259
to
Rouse
beds
already
women
the
lawmaking.
to
adults,
vote
before
beds parents,
-
A*uaywnr..
governor’s
and
is
Bucks
set
before
we
in
informing
in
too,
require
advancing
to
private
their
County
can
not
The
reconvene
know
final
desk
cut
the
20s
that
Indoor
residences
customers
Courier
the
down
government.
passage.
and
shortly
it
they
on
risks.
at
rkw.ni4f3flOI4
30s,
Tanning
on
Wednesday,
maintain
lime...
I
after
p.m.
our
that
or
about
UV-free
cases
on
have
lawmakers
Association
Page
records
potential
April
of
had
so
2
of 2