A Biface, Anyone? We’Ll Never Know What Purpose the Clovis Knapper Had in Mind for This Magnificent Preform When He Buried It in Colorado 13,000 Years Ago

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Biface, Anyone? We’Ll Never Know What Purpose the Clovis Knapper Had in Mind for This Magnificent Preform When He Buried It in Colorado 13,000 Years Ago Volume 22, Number 2 ■ April, 2007 Center for the Study of the First Americans Department of Anthropology Texas A&M University 4352 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-4352 www.centerfirstamericans.com A biface, anyone? We’ll never know what purpose the Clovis knapper had in mind for this magnificent preform when he buried it in Colorado 13,000 years ago. He may have cached it at a location his party routinely visited on hunting trips as a ready supply of toolstone for refurbishing their toolkits. Or it may have been simply too wonderful to use, and so he buried it as a ceremonial offering. Whatever his motive, he buried it so that no one could find it. And no one did, until J. David Kilby, a doctoral candidate at the University of New Mexico. Kilby has studied more than 20 Clovis caches in the West and as far north as Minnesota. Our story on the conclusions he has reached begins on page 13. J. DAVID KILBY he Center for the Study of the First Americans fosters research and public T interest in the Peopling of the Americas. The Center, an integral part of the Department of Anthropology at Texas A&M University, promotes interdisciplinary scholarly dialogue among physical, geological, biological and social scientists. The Mammoth Trumpet, news magazine of the Center, seeks to involve you in the peopling of the Americas by reporting on developments in all pertinent areas of knowledge. Volume 22, Number 2 Center for the Study of the First Americans Department of Anthropology April, 2007 Texas A&M University, 4352 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4352 ISSN 8755-6898 World Wide Web site www.centerfirstamericans.com and http://anthropology.tamu.edu Pleistocene Human Colonization of Beringia 4 A successful partnership in a Pennsylvania Clovis dig An avocational archaeologist teams up with graduate students A Workshop That Really Worked ! at “a textbook Clovis site.” LTHOUGH SCIENTISTS generally Human Colonization of Arctic and Subarc- 8 Recognition long overdue at understand climate and environ- tic Siberia and Beringia, held last Novem- a classic California site mental change during the Last Gla- ber 17–19 at Texas A&M University. Re- The scientist who first dug at Borax Lake discovered a sister Acial Maximum (LGM), the complex dynam- searchers from around the world met to culture of Clovis. His achievement ics of human dispersal across eastern Sibe- discuss key issues concerning population wasn’t recognized in his lifetime. ria, Alaska, and portions of the Yukon and movements throughout Beringia at the end Now the site is a National Northwest Territories—collectively known of the Pleistocene and their implications for Historic Landmark. as Beringia—have eluded precise defini- the settlement of the Americas. Hosted by 13 What Clovis knappers buried tion. A big step in clarifying the picture was the Center for the Study of the First Ameri- Investigating their caches has made at an intensive workshop, Pleistocene cans, the workshop reviewed the current told J. David Kilby a lot about how Clovis people made use of the land and its resources. 18 Extinct human ancestral line found in British Columbia Finally, proof that early Americans were more genetically diverse than is evident from today’s known populations—thanks to help from a local tribe. 16 Remembering Richard Morlan state of knowledge, outlined research priorities, and identified avenues for new research. Sponsored by the International Quaternary Association (INQUA) and the National Science Foundation, the Workshop participants take time out for a group photo in front of workshop was organized by Ted the Sterling Evans Library on the Texas A&M University campus. CHARLOTTE D. PEVNY Goebel, a member of the TAMU fac- 2 Volume 22 ■ Number 2 ulty and Associate Director of CSFA, to cess of Paleolithic settlement.” Accord- reya, Vaughn Bryant, and David “foster international and interdisciplinary ingly the workshop agenda allotted six Carlson. Graduate students from the research on the spread of modern human hours for participants to work in special- Department of Anthropology Jessi populations into northernmost Siberia topic groups, then present their individual Halligan, Tom Jennings, Josh Keene, and Beringia during the late Pleis- findings to all the attendees. Charlotte Pevny, Tim Riley, and tocene—40,000 to 10,000 years ago.” Among the non-presenters who at- Ashley Smallwood shuttled attendees to With this objective in mind, scientists tended the workshop were scientists ac- and from the workshop, to dinner, and on engaged in researching human coloniza- tive in peopling of the Americas research a field trip to visit Buttermilk Creek, a tion above 55° N latitude assembled to including Alan Bryan, Ruth Gruhn, Clovis-age site. participate in the “think tank.” The 23 Andy Hemmings, David Madsen, and presenters from across the continental Dennis Stanford. Also attending were Setting the geographical stage U.S. and Alaska, Russia, France, and TAMU faculty members Sheela Ath- Following a welcome from Ben Crouch, Canada represent 16 different academic institutions, federal agencies, and private firms. Their papers focused on the known paleoenvironmental data from Beringia including reconstructed late-Pleistocene geography, geomorphology, climate, and vegetation, the distribution of archaeo- logical sites, and technological variability. An interdisciplinary and interna- tional event The Mammoth Trumpet (ISSN 8755-6898) is published quarterly by the Center for This remarkable 3-day workshop was in- the Study of the First Americans, Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, tended, says Goebel, to “initiate interna- College Station, TX 77843-4352. Phone (979) 845-4046; fax (979) 845-4070; e-mail tional dialog between various Quaternary [email protected]. Periodical postage paid at College Station, TX 77843-4352 and at specialists—not just archaeologists, but additional mailing offices. also geomorphologists, paleobotantists, POSTMASTER: Send address changes to: and paleontologists.” So that Russian- and Mammoth Trumpet English-speaking researchers could ex- Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University 4352 TAMU change ideas effectively, four or five pre- College Station, TX 77843-4352 sentations were given consecutively, followed by a 20-minute discussion period Copyright © 2007 Center for the Study of the First Americans. Permission is hereby given to any non-profit or educational organization or institution to reproduce without where everyone could pose questions and cost any materials from the Mammoth Trumpet so long as they are then distributed at make comments. no more than actual cost. The Center further requests that notification of reproduction Russian archaeologists also had the of materials under these conditions be sent to the Center. Address correspondence to the opportunity to examine firsthand late- editor of Mammoth Trumpet, 2122 Scout Road, Lenoir, NC 28645. Pleistocene materials from the continen- Michael R. Waters Director and General Editor tal U.S.: bifaces, overshot flakes, e-mail: [email protected] wedge-shaped cores, blades, and expedi- Ted Goebel Associate Director and Editor, Current Research in ent tools from the Gault and Buttermilk the Pleistocene Creek sites; casts of Clovis, Goshen, and e-mail: [email protected] Folsom projectile points; casts of numer- James M. Chandler Editor, Mammoth Trumpet ous forms of ivory points, as well as a e-mail: [email protected] bone wrench and ivory atlatl hooks, cour- Laurie Lind Office Manager tesy of Andy Hemmings (Texas Archeo- C & C Wordsmiths Layout and Design logical Research Laboratory, University World Wide Web site http://centerfirstamericans.com of Texas); and casts of artifacts from The Center for the Study of the First Americans is a non-profit organization. Sub- Beringian sites, courtesy of Dennis scription to the Mammoth Trumpet is by membership in the Center. Stanford (Smithsonian Institution). Taking stock of our current base of Mammoth Trumpet, Statement of Our Policy knowledge was only half the mission. An Many years may pass between the time an important discovery is made and the acceptance of research equally important objective of the work- results by the scientific community. To facilitate communication among all parties interested in staying shop was to plot a course through un- abreast of breaking news in First Americans studies, the Mammoth Trumpet, a science news magazine, provides a forum for reporting and discussing new and potentially controversial information important known waters; in Goebel’s words, to to understanding the peopling of the Americas. We encourage submission of articles to the Managing propose new research “that will lead to Editor and letters to the Editor. Views published in the Mammoth Trumpet are the views of recovery of a comprehensive Paleolithic contributors, and do not reflect the views of the editor or Center personnel. record and an understanding of the pro- –Michael R. Waters, Director April ■ 2007 3 Executive Associate Dean for the College of Liberal Arts, Mike Waters (left foreground) and Michael Waters, Direc- heads up a tour of the Butter- tor of CSFA, Gary Haynes milk Creek site. A “walk about” (University of Nevada, Reno), gave workshop participants an the current president of appreciation of the layout of INQUA’s Commission on the area while Waters summa- Palaeoecology and Human rized the 2006 excavation Evolution (PAHE), set the tone season and explained the for the workshop. His paper, stratigraphic sequence at the “INQUA’s Initiative to Explore site. Like Gault,
Recommended publications
  • OBSIDIAN: an INTERDISCIPLINARY Bffiliography
    OBSIDIAN: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BffiLIOGRAPHY Craig E. Skinner Kim J. Tremaine International Association for Obsidian Studies Occasional Paper No. 1 1993 \ \ Obsidian: An Interdisciplinary Bibliography by Craig E. Skinner Kim J. Tremaine • 1993 by Craig Skinner and Kim Tremaine International Association for Obsidian Studies Department of Anthropology San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192-0113 International Association for Obsidian Studies Occasional Paper No. 1 1993 Magmas cooled to freezing temperature and crystallized to a solid have to lose heat of crystallization. A glass, since it never crystallizes to form a solid, never changes phase and never has to lose heat of crystallization. Obsidian, supercooled below the crystallization point, remained a liquid. Glasses form when some physical property of a lava restricts ion mobility enough to prevent them from binding together into an ordered crystalline pattern. Aa the viscosity ofthe lava increases, fewer particles arrive at positions of order until no particle arrangement occurs before solidification. In a glaas, the ions must remain randomly arranged; therefore, a magma forming a glass must be extremely viscous yet fluid enough to reach the surface. 1he modem rational explanation for obsidian petrogenesis (Bakken, 1977:88) Some people called a time at the flat named Tok'. They were going to hunt deer. They set snares on the runway at Blood Gap. Adder bad real obsidian. The others made their arrows out of just anything. They did not know about obsidian. When deer were caught in snares, Adder shot and ran as fast as he could to the deer, pulled out the obsidian and hid it in his quiver.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Presentations, 2019 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Jackson, Mississippi
    Schedule of Presentations, 2019 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Jackson, Mississippi Wendesday Afternoon Assemblages from the St. Albans November 6 Site Sexual Harrasment Training 8:40 Miller, D. Shane, Stephen Briarwood Carmody What Happened at the 3:00-5:00 End of the Early Archaic?: SEAC Board Meeting Examining Paleoindian and Newbury Archaic Subsistence Trajectories 7:30 in the Mid-South Thursday Morning 9:00 Hollenbach, Kandace Nuts, November 7 Seeds, and River Valleys: The Newbury Late Archaic/Early Woodland 9:00- Film Screenings Haley, Messer, Transition in East Tennessee 12:00 Analise Hollingshead, Jayur 9:20 Baumann, Timothy J., Gary Mehta, Mike Russo, Jeff Shanks Crites, Peggy Humes, Tony Windsor IV and V Krus Full of Beans: The Story of 10:00- NAGPRA Workshop: the Common Bean (Phaseolus 1:00 Cultivating a Community of vulgaris) in the Midsouth Practice for Southeastern 9:40 Purcell, Gabrielle Sweet NAGPRA Practitioners Potatoes on Cherokee Sites: A Amanda Thompson, Tim Closer Look Using SEM Analysis Bauman, Jennifer Bedell, 10:00 BREAK RaeLynne Butler, Bryant Celeste, 10:20 Whyte, Thomas R. How Ancient Melanie O'Brien, Kirk Perry, Lithic Scavenging Influences Aexandra Smith, Emman Spain, Models of Settlement, Mobility, Ian Thompson, Victor Thompson, and Exchange in the Appalachian John Underwood, LeeAnne Summit Wendt, and Ryan Wheeler 10:40 Kimball, Larry R., Alice P. Windsor I Wright, Timothy J. Horsley, Symposium, Backhoes & Thomas R. Whyte, Gary Trowels, Ancestor Idols & Crites, John Wolf, Cala Murals: Some Contributions to Castleberry, M. Scott Shumate Southeastern Archaeology by Biltmore Mound and Village Jefferson Chapman and 11:00 Sherwood, Sarah The Legacy of Friends, Part I Prepared Clay Surfaces 8:00 Davis, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jfl/V 0 3 2001 NFS Form 10-900USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 HESTER SITE Pagel United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service _____ ___ National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: HESTER SITE Other Name/Site Number: Hester-Standifer Creek Site (22Mo569), Beachum-Harrison Site (22Mol011) 2. LOCATION Street & Number: N/A Not for publication: X City/Town: Amory Vicinity: X State: Mississippi County: Monroe Code: 095 ZipCode:38821 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): __ Public-local: __ District: __ Public-State: __ Site: X Public-Federal: Structure: __ Object: __ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing ___ buildings 1 ___ sites ___ structures ___ objects 1 0 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: _1_ Name of related multiple property listing: N/A Jfl/V 0 3 2001 NFS Form 10-900USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No 1024-0018 HESTER SITE Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service____________________________________ National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this __ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • I Tt R Summer 981
    I tt r Summer 981 Early n it In• ToB eserv The Archaeological Conservancy has obtained an option to points and found in a number of early man sites in the Great purchase the Borax Lake Archaeological Site in Lake County, Basin and Great Plains, but not on the Pacific Coast. California, 75 miles north of San Francisco. The Borax Lake site Since the site lacks adequate stratigraphy and no other dating is believed to be at least 10,000 to 12,000 years old making it one technique was available to him at the time, Harrington was left of the oldest human sites in North America. with only the type style of the pOints on which to base an estimate of a date for the site. His conclusion that the Borax Lake site dated from 10,000 to 15,000 years ago challenged previous beliefs that man did not reach the Pacific Coast until much later, and stirred a great controversy in the archaeological community. Harrington's conclusions were challenged on a number of levels. First, major geologic events have disrupted the stratigraphy of the cultural remains. At the time Harrington published the Borax Lake findings, archaeologists relied heavily on stratigraphy as a relative dating technique. Archaeologists in the United States first adapted this technique from the science of geology, applying it to the field of archaeology in the Southwest in the early 1900's. The basic assumption in stratigraphic analysis is that the latest material deposited on the site is on the surface, and that deeper layers were formed in earlier times.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan for the State of Mississippi
    The Historic Preservation Division of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History (HPD of MDAH) is responsible for the development and implementation of a Statewide Preservation Plan under National Park Service requirements. The Plan addresses the preservation of Mississippi’s historic and cultural resources, including architectural, historic, and prehistoric properties. The Plan identifies the trends affecting historic and cultural resources so that informed decisions can be made about the management and care of these properties. Individuals, private businesses, community groups, local governments, and state and federal agencies can and should be active participants in the implementation of this Plan. Since Mississippi does not have a formal statewide governmental planning program, the development of partnerships between the public and private sector is crucial to the success of the preservation plan. Planning Process The Comprehensive Plan for 2011 through 2016 is an update and revision of the 2005 Comprehensive Plan, building upon the earlier framework with modifications and new goals and objectives derived with input from the public and the experience of the users. During the spring of 2010, the staff of HPD of MDAH conducted a well-advertised public meeting at the Eola Hotel in downtown Natchez, Mississippi, in conjunction with the Statewide Preservation Conference. The meeting was well attended by a broad spectrum of Mississippi’s community leaders—elected officials, economic development coordinators, merchants, businessmen, educators, housing authorities, tourism promoters, and representatives of non-profit organizations, in addition to preservationists. A Web-based questionnaire was sent to over 1000 people throughout the state and was available through the homepage of the MDAH Web site.
    [Show full text]
  • James Strawn Thesis (3.118 Mb )
    Template B v3.0 (beta): Created by J. Nail 06/2015 A geoarchaeological analysis of the 2017 excavations at the Hester site (22MO569) By TITLE PAGE James Lewis Strawn A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology in the Department of Anthropology and Middle Eastern Cultures Mississippi State, Mississippi August 2019 Copyright by COPYRIGHT PAGE James Lewis Strawn 2019 A geoarchaeological analysis of the 2017 excavations at the Hester site (22MO569) By APPROVAL PAGE James Lewis Strawn Approved: ____________________________________ Darcy Shane Miller (Major Professor) ____________________________________ James W. Hardin (Committee Member) ____________________________________ Evan Peacock (Committee Member) ____________________________________ David M. Hoffman (Graduate Coordinator) ____________________________________ Rick Travis Dean College of Arts & Sciences Name: James Lewis Strawn ABSTRACT Date of Degree: August 9, 2019 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: Applied Anthropology Major Professor: D. Shane Miller Title of Study: A geoarchaeological analysis of the 2017 excavations at the Hester site (22MO569) Pages in Study 99 Candidate for Degree of Master of Arts The small number and diffuse distribution of sites with intact Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene occupations in the Southeastern United States consequently makes examining Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene settlement patterning in the region difficult (Goodyear 1999). The Hester Site (22MO569), located in northeastern Mississippi, contains intact Late Pleistocene/Early Holocene deposits that can potentially afford archaeologists with a better understanding of late Pleistocene/early Holocene settlement in the region (Brookes 1979; Goodyear 1999:463-465). Investigations at Hester by Brookes (1979) revealed a stratified site containing artifacts that represented the late Paleoindian through Woodland periods in the Southeastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 MAKING PREHISTORIC MUSIC by JOANNE SHEEHY HOOVER Research Indicates That the Anasazi Played an Amazing Variety of Instruments, and That Music Played An
    AA Win 04-05 pg C1-12 11/18/04 1:49 PM Page C1 THE CONSERVANCY TURNS 25 • PREHISTORIC MUSIC • A PASSPORT TO THE PAST americanamerican archaeologyarchaeologyWINTER 2004-05 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 8 No. 4 AA TaleTale ofof ConflictConflict InIn TexasTexas 4444>> $3.95 75752527425274 91765 91765 AA Win 04-05 pg C1-12 11/17/04 1:27 PM Page C2 archaeological tours led by noted scholars superb itineraries, unsurpassed service For the past 30 years, Archaeological Tours has been arranging specialized tours for a discriminating clientele. Our tours feature distinguished scholars who stress the historical, anthropological and archaeological aspects of the areas visited. We offer a unique opportunity for tour participants to see and understand historically important and culturally significant areas of the world. Professor John Henderson in Tikal MAYA SUPERPOWERS SILK ROAD OF CHINA CYPRUS, CRETE & SANTORINI This tour examines the ferocious political struggles This exotic tour traces the fabled Silk Road from Xian to This popular tour examines the maritime civilizations between the Maya superpowers in the Late Classical Kashgar and includes remote Kuqa, famed for the Kizil linking pre- and ancient Greek and Roman cultures with period. At the heart of these struggles was a bitter Thousand Buddha Caves, Ürümqi, and the fascinating the East. After a seven-day tour of Cyprus and a five- antagonism between Tikal in Guatemala and Calakmul Sunday bazaar at Kashgar. We will explore the caravan day exploration of Minoan Crete, we sail to Santorini to in Mexico. New roads will allow us to visit these ancient oasis of Turfan, Dunhuang’s spectacular grottoes of visit Thera and the excavations at Akrotiri.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Circular 32: Early Man in Washington
    ~,~Rf~Y MAN IN WASHINGTON RICHARD D. DAUGHifl'fY State of Washington ALBERT D. ROSELLINI, Governor Department of Conservation EARL COE, Director DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY MARSHALL T. HUNTTING, Supervisor Information Circular No. 32 EARLY MAN IN WASHINGTON By RICHARD D. DAUGHERTY • STAT~ P~INTING Pl,..&,NT ~ OLYMPIA. WASH •• 1959 For sale by Department of Conservation, Olympia, Washington. Price, 50 cents. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The successful completion of a modern archaeological excavation and the analysis and publication of what was discovered is really the product of a number of specialists in different fields, and of the enthusiastic support of the work by interested local citizens. The author wishes to express his appreciation to geologists Dr. Charles D. Campbell, Dr. Harold E. Culver, and Mr. Lee Nering of the State College of Washington for their study and analysis of the geology of the Lind Coulee Site. Paleontologists Drs. Herbert Freidman, C. Lewis Gazin, Theodore White, and Joseph P. E. Mor­ rison of the U. S. National Museum generously contributed their time and knowledge in the identification of the paleontological specimens. Mrs. Betty J. Enbysk of the University of Washington made a field paleontological study of the site and its surroundings. Soils specialists Dr. Henry Smith, Dr. Robert A. McCreery, and Mr. Warren Starr of the State College of Washington examined the deposits of the site for fossil soils. Dr. Willard F. Libby, formerly of the Institute for Nuclear Studies, University of Chicago, made the radiocarbon analysis of the burned bison bone. Dr. John Corbett, Dr. John Cotter, and Mr. Louis Caywood, archaeologists of the National Park Service; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian/Early Archaic Period1
    1 PALEOINDIAN/EARLY ARCHAIC PERIOD1 Samuel O. McGahey2 Introduction Over the past few years, a serious effort has been made to draw together all available early lithic data from Mississippi in order to form the basis for "historical contexts" for the state preservation plan. The archaeological contexts are defined by geographical and chronological dimensions. The chronological dimensions are those that are generally accepted by the archaeological community. Since, in the view of the writer, Paleoindian and Early Archaic are a continuum and the end of this continuum is recognized abruptly with the onset of the Middle Archaic, it has been decided to treat them as a unit. This unit is somewhat arbitrarily divided into five subperiods for the study of broad general trends in artifact if not people distribution. The geographical dimensions are the ten physiographic regions generally recognized by the natural scientists who study plant and animal communities. They are: the Yazoo Basin, the Loess Hills, the North Central Hills, the Flatwoods, the Pontotoc Ridge, the Black Prairies, the Tombigbee Hills, the Jackson Prairie, the Longleaf Pine Belt, and the Coastal Pine Meadows (fig. 1). While the ideal is to discuss the contexts as a physiographic region within a given archaeological period, it has not been possible to attain this goal because of a lack of data in certain areas and the ten physiographic regions have been consolidated into four for the present. Nevertheless enough data has been accumulated that certain regional differences are obvious, and this is the primary reason for this paper. The data is presented below in the form of histograms representing the five subperiods (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of Aboriginal Archaeological Plant Food Remains from Eastern North America: 1901–1991
    A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ABORIGINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL PLANT FOOD REMAINS FROM EASTERN NORTH AMERICA: 1901–1991 Richard A. Yarnell Thomas O. Maher M. Jean Black Research Report No. 11 Research Laboratories of Anthropology The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1993 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ABORIGINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL PLANT FOOD REMAINS FROM EASTERN NORTH AMERICA: 1901–1991 by Richard A. Yarnell Thomas O. Maher and M. Jean Black Research Report 11 Research Laboratories of Anthropology University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120 October, 1993 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 BIBLIOGRAPHY................................................................................................................................................................... 6 INDEX BY STATE AND REGION......................................................................................................................................59 Northeast ......................................................................................................................................................................59 Coastal Southeast .........................................................................................................................................................61 Middle South................................................................................................................................................................63
    [Show full text]
  • 74Th Annual Meeting, Tulsa, Oklahoma
    74th Annual Meeting, Tulsa, Oklahoma 1 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 60, 2017 2 74th Annual Meeting, Tulsa, Oklahoma BULLETIN 60 2017 Proceedings and Abstracts of the 74th Annual Meeting November 8-11, 2017 Hyatt Regency Tulsa, Oklahoma Organized by: Thomas Foster, Scott Hammerstedt, Patrick Livingood, Amanda Regnier, Miriam Belmaker, Bobi Deere, Paige Ford, Kara Foster, Shawn Lambert, Alicia Odewale, Danielle Macdonald, Kim Ivey, and Katie Williams 3 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 60, 2017 Cover: Map of Indian Territory, 1837-1855. Image ITMAP.0152 is used with permission of the Research Division of the Oklahoma Historical Society © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2017 4 74th Annual Meeting, Tulsa, Oklahoma TABLE OF CONTENTS Hyatt Regency Floor Plan........................................................................................6 List of Donors............................................................................................................8 SEAC Sessions...........................................................................................................9 Preface and Acknowledgements..........................................................................10 Statement on Photographs of Human Remains................................................11 General Information..............................................................................................12 Special Events Schedule........................................................................................13
    [Show full text]