Flags and Arms of the Czech Republic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Price of Velvet: Thomas Masaryk and Vaclav Havel Gellner, Ernest
www.ssoar.info The Price of Velvet: Thomas Masaryk and Vaclav Havel Gellner, Ernest Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Gellner, E. (1995). The Price of Velvet: Thomas Masaryk and Vaclav Havel. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 3(1), 45-57. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53735 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document -
THE LION FLAG Norway's First National Flag Jan Henrik Munksgaard
THE LION FLAG Norway’s First National Flag Jan Henrik Munksgaard On 27 February 1814, the Norwegian Regent Christian Frederik made a proclamation concerning the Norwegian flag, stating: The Norwegian flag shall henceforth be red, with a white cross dividing the flag into quarters. The national coat of arms, the Norwegian lion with the yellow halberd, shall be placed in the upper hoist corner. All naval and merchant vessels shall fly this flag. This was Norway’s first national flag. What was the background for this proclamation? Why should Norway have a new flag in 1814, and what are the reasons for the design and colours of this flag? The Dannebrog Was the Flag of Denmark-Norway For several hundred years, Denmark-Norway had been in a legislative union. Denmark was the leading party in this union, and Copenhagen was the administrative centre of the double monarchy. The Dannebrog had been the common flag of the whole realm since the beginning of the 16th century. The red flag with a white cross was known all over Europe, and in every shipping town the citizens were familiar with this symbol of Denmark-Norway. Two variants of The Dannebrog existed: a swallow-tailed flag, which was the king’s flag or state flag flown on government vessels and buildings, and a rectangular flag for private use on ordinary merchant ships or on private flagpoles. In addition, a number of special flags based on the Dannebrog existed. The flag was as frequently used and just as popular in Norway as in Denmark. The Napoleonic Wars Result in Political Changes in Scandinavia At the beginning of 1813, few Norwegians could imagine dissolution of the union with Denmark. -
Vexillum, June 2018, No. 2
Research and news of the North American Vexillological Association June 2018 No. Recherche et nouvelles de l’Association nord-américaine de vexillologie Juin 2018 2 INSIDE Page Editor’s Note 2 President’s Column 3 NAVA Membership Anniversaries 3 The Flag of Unity in Diversity 4 Incorporating NAVA News and Flag Research Quarterly Book Review: "A Flag Worth Dying For: The Power and Politics of National Symbols" 7 New Flags: 4 Reno, Nevada 8 The International Vegan Flag 9 Regional Group Report: The Flag of Unity Chesapeake Bay Flag Association 10 Vexi-News Celebrates First Anniversary 10 in Diversity Judge Carlos Moore, Mississippi Flag Activist 11 Stamp Celebrates 200th Anniversary of the Flag Act of 1818 12 Captain William Driver Award Guidelines 12 The Water The Water Protectors: Native American Nationalism, Environmentalism, and the Flags of the Dakota Access Pipeline Protectors Protests of 2016–2017 13 NAVA Grants 21 Evolutionary Vexillography in the Twenty-First Century 21 13 Help Support NAVA's Upcoming Vatican Flags Book 23 NAVA Annual Meeting Notice 24 Top: The Flag of Unity in Diversity Right: Demonstrators at the NoDAPL protests in January 2017. Source: https:// www.indianz.com/News/2017/01/27/delay-in- nodapl-response-points-to-more.asp 2 | June 2018 • Vexillum No. 2 June / Juin 2018 Number 2 / Numéro 2 Editor's Note | Note de la rédaction Dear Reader: We hope you enjoyed the premiere issue of Vexillum. In addition to offering my thanks Research and news of the North American to the contributors and our fine layout designer Jonathan Lehmann, I owe a special note Vexillological Association / Recherche et nouvelles de l’Association nord-américaine of gratitude to NAVA members Peter Ansoff, Stan Contrades, Xing Fei, Ted Kaye, Pete de vexillologie. -
The History of Florida's State Flag the History of Florida's State Flag Robert M
Nova Law Review Volume 18, Issue 2 1994 Article 11 The History of Florida’s State Flag Robert M. Jarvis∗ ∗ Copyright c 1994 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Jarvis: The History of Florida's State Flag The History of Florida's State Flag Robert M. Jarvis* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........ .................. 1037 II. EUROPEAN DISCOVERY AND CONQUEST ........... 1038 III. AMERICAN ACQUISITION AND STATEHOOD ......... 1045 IV. THE CIVIL WAR .......................... 1051 V. RECONSTRUCTION AND THE END OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY ..................... 1056 VI. THE TWENTIETH CENTURY ................... 1059 VII. CONCLUSION ............................ 1063 I. INTRODUCTION The Florida Constitution requires the state to have an official flag, and places responsibility for its design on the State Legislature.' Prior to 1900, a number of different flags served as the state's banner. Since 1900, however, the flag has consisted of a white field,2 a red saltire,3 and the * Professor of Law, Nova University. B.A., Northwestern University; J.D., University of Pennsylvania; LL.M., New York University. 1. "The design of the great seal and flag of the state shall be prescribed by law." FLA. CONST. art. If, § 4. Although the constitution mentions only a seal and a flag, the Florida Legislature has designated many other state symbols, including: a state flower (the orange blossom - adopted in 1909); bird (mockingbird - 1927); song ("Old Folks Home" - 1935); tree (sabal palm - 1.953); beverage (orange juice - 1967); shell (horse conch - 1969); gem (moonstone - 1970); marine mammal (manatee - 1975); saltwater mammal (dolphin - 1975); freshwater fish (largemouth bass - 1975); saltwater fish (Atlantic sailfish - 1975); stone (agatized coral - 1979); reptile (alligator - 1987); animal (panther - 1982); soil (Mayakka Fine Sand - 1989); and wildflower (coreopsis - 1991). -
Differences Between National Memory of Communism in Poland and the Czech Republic
CHARLES UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Institute of International Studies Graham Bush UCL Student Number: 000821583 UCL Candidate Number: CHXQ1 Differences Between National Memory of Communism in Poland and the Czech Republic. Master Thesis Prague 2014 Author: Graham Bush Supervisor: doc. PhDr. Jiří Vykoukal, CSc Academic Year: 2013/2014 2 Bibliographic note Bush, Graham. Differences Between National Memory of Communism in Poland and the Czech Republic. 77 p. Master thesis. Charles University, Faculty of Social Sciences. Supervisor: doc. PhDr. Jiří Vykoukal, CSc Abstract This work aims to demonstrate differences in national memory of Communism in the Czech Republic and Poland. It looks into the principles surrounding the practice of collective memory and then uses this to create a working methodology for the study of it in these two nations. In evaluating memory in these countries it relies upon the “Three Pillars” of past events, cultural output and popular opinion and stresses the interconnected nature of these academic areas. A further emphasis is placed upon the role of belief in shaping personal and group self-identity. The overall conclusions stress that both of the national memories of these countries have been shaped by their history, culture and popular opinion, and that this has created a divide between the Polish and Czech views of events during the Communist period. The divide is seen as characterised by particular “Czech” and “Polish” viewpoints which are the product of discourse on previous aspects of what it means to belong to these respective groups. National memory in essence builds upon itself, and will continue to do so. -
Flags and Banners
Flags and Banners A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton Contents 1 Flag 1 1.1 History ................................................. 2 1.2 National flags ............................................. 4 1.2.1 Civil flags ........................................... 8 1.2.2 War flags ........................................... 8 1.2.3 International flags ....................................... 8 1.3 At sea ................................................. 8 1.4 Shapes and designs .......................................... 9 1.4.1 Vertical flags ......................................... 12 1.5 Religious flags ............................................. 13 1.6 Linguistic flags ............................................. 13 1.7 In sports ................................................ 16 1.8 Diplomatic flags ............................................ 18 1.9 In politics ............................................... 18 1.10 Vehicle flags .............................................. 18 1.11 Swimming flags ............................................ 19 1.12 Railway flags .............................................. 20 1.13 Flagpoles ............................................... 21 1.13.1 Record heights ........................................ 21 1.13.2 Design ............................................. 21 1.14 Hoisting the flag ............................................ 21 1.15 Flags and communication ....................................... 21 1.16 Flapping ................................................ 23 1.17 See also ............................................... -
The Dynamics of Flag Evolution
The Dynamics of Flag Evolution THE DYNAMICS OF FLAG EVOLUTION the obvious colours for the flag is still alive and doing well, although unfortunately extinct in Britain. Dr. William G. Crampton The ideal heraldic process was therefore from the arms, to the colours, to the flag, particularly the flag for This paper is the second instalment of my treatment common usage, and from there to a further form, the of the theoretical aspects of flag evolution and taxo striped flag with the arms added back to it, to make a nomy, following from the paper on the «Phylogenesis more official or Important flag. Another use of this, as of Vexillology# presented at Barcelona in 1991In that we know from the work of Rabbow and Gunther is the paper I postulated that just as living organisms form civic flag with the arms added back to it, probably for themselves into genetic families so do flag designs, and purposes of distinction, since there is a limit to the num that these grow into major, intermediate and minor ber of striped flags that can exist together at any one groupings as do organic life-forms. I also postulated the time^-T existence of at least twelve major flag root-forms, label led «Urflaggen», from which, it could be demonstrated, Related to heraldry and roughly co-terminous with it a huge proportion of the world's flags, both extant and was the influence of religion. Two major forms of this extinct, could be shown to be derived. are known: the Christian and the Moslem, and both related very directly to flags for personal and territorial The purpose of this paper is to illustrate some of the use. -
American City Flags, Part 1
Akron, Ohio 1 Akron, Ohio Population Rank: U.S..... # 81 Ohio...... # 5 Proportions: 3:5 (usage) Adopted: March 1996 (official) DESIGN: Akron’s flag has a white field with the city seal in the center. The seal features an American shield, which recalls the design of the All-America City program’s shield, awarded to cities meeting the pro- gram criteria. Akron’s shield is divided roughly into thirds horizontally. At the top of the shield are two rows of five white five-pointed stars on a dark blue field. In the center section is AKRON in black on white. The lower third displays six red and five white vertical stripes. Around the shield and the white field on which it rests is a dark blue ring on which 1981-ALL-AMERICA CITY-1995 curves clockwise above, and CITY OF INVENTION curves counterclockwise below, all in white. 2 American City Flags SYMBOLISM: Akron, having twice won the distinction of “All-America City” (in 1981 and 1995), has chosen to pattern its seal to commemo- rate that award. The ten stars represent the ten wards of the city. CITY OF INVENTION refers to Akron as home to the National Inventor’s Hall of Fame at Inventure Place, a museum of inventors and inven- tions. HOW SELECTED: Prepared by the mayor and his chief of staff. DESIGNER: Mayor Don Plusquellic and his chief of staff, Joel Bailey. FORMER FLAG: Akron’s former flag also places the city seal in the center of a white field. That former logo-type seal is oval, oriented horizontally. -
NASA Symbols and Flags in the US Manned Space Program
SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER 2007 #230 THE FLAG BULLETIN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEXILLOLOGY www.flagresearchcenter.com 225 [email protected] THE FLAG BULLETIN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEXILLOLOGY September-December 2007 No. 230 Volume XLVI, Nos. 5-6 FLAGS IN SPACE: NASA SYMBOLS AND FLAGS IN THE U.S. MANNED SPACE PROGRAM Anne M. Platoff 143-221 COVER PICTURES 222 INDEX 223-224 The Flag Bulletin is officially recognized by the International Federation of Vexillological Associations for the publication of scholarly articles relating to vexillology Art layout for this issue by Terri Malgieri Funding for addition of color pages and binding of this combined issue was provided by the University of California, Santa Barbara Library and by the University of California Research Grants for Librarians Program. The Flag Bulletin at the time of publication was behind schedule and therefore the references in the article to dates after December 2007 reflect events that occurred after that date but before the publication of this issue in 2010. © Copyright 2007 by the Flag Research Center; all rights reserved. Postmaster: Send address changes to THE FLAG BULLETIN, 3 Edgehill Rd., Winchester, Mass. 01890 U.S.A. THE FLAG BULLETIN (ISSN 0015-3370) is published bimonthly; the annual subscription rate is $68.00. Periodicals postage paid at Winchester. www.flagresearchcenter.com www.flagresearchcenter.com 141 [email protected] ANNE M. PLATOFF (Annie) is a librarian at the University of Cali- fornia, Santa Barbara Library. From 1989-1996 she was a contrac- tor employee at NASA’s Johnson Space Center. During this time she worked as an Information Specialist for the New Initiatives Of- fice and the Exploration Programs Office, and later as a Policy Ana- lyst for the Public Affairs Office. -
The State Flag of Georgia: the 1956 Change in Its Historical Context
The State Senate Senate Research Office Bill Littlefield 204 Legislative Office Building Telephone Managing Director 18 Capitol Square 404/ 656 0015 Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Martha Wigton Fax Director 404/ 657 0929 The State Flag of Georgia: The 1956 Change In Its Historical Context Prepared by: Alexander J. Azarian and Eden Fesshazion Senate Research Office August 2000 Table of Contents Preface.....................................................................................i I. Introduction: National Flags of the Confederacy and the Evolution of the State Flag of Georgia.................................1 II. The Confederate Battle Flag.................................................6 III. The 1956 Legislative Session: Preserving segregation...........................................................9 IV. The 1956 Flag Change.........................................................18 V. John Sammons Bell.............................................................23 VI. Conclusion............................................................................27 Works Consulted..................................................................29 Preface This paper is a study of the redesigning of Georgia’s present state flag during the 1956 session of the General Assembly as well as a general review of the evolution of the pre-1956 state flag. No attempt will be made in this paper to argue that the state flag is controversial simply because it incorporates the Confederate battle flag or that it represents the Confederacy itself. Rather, this paper will focus on the flag as it has become associated, since the 1956 session, with preserving segregation, resisting the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, and maintaining white supremacy in Georgia. A careful examination of the history of Georgia’s state flag, the 1956 session of the General Assembly, the designer of the present state flag – John Sammons Bell, the legislation redesigning the 1956 flag, and the status of segregation at that time, will all be addressed in this study. -
Jan Hus Projev Upr BF 11052015
Jan Hus in the Czech history and his legacy today University of Pretoria, Faculty of Theology, 5 May 2015 Prof. Buitendag, Dean of the Faculty of Theology at the University of Pretoria, Reverend Abrahams, President of the Moravian Church in South Africa, Ambassador van de Geer, Head of the EU Delegation, Ambassadors, High Commissioners, Members of the Diplomatic Corps, Representatives of South African institutions, Czech compatriots, Ladies and Gentleman, It's my utmost pleasure to open the exhibition recalling the 600 th anniversary of the death of Jan Hus, one of the most prominent personalities in the Czech history. I have no doubt that many of you, when receiving the invitation, asked yourself a question what meaning the death of a priest from the medieval Kingdom of Bohemia had for today and especially for South Africa. For me personally, a citizen of the Czech Republic, which comprises the historical Czech lands Bohemia and Moravia, it is fascinating how people's lives get connected even though they are separated by thousands of kilometres and by hundreds of years. The links between Jan Hus and South Africa are profound, as you will see from the exhibition panels and heard from Rev. Abrahams, the President of the Moravian Church in South Africa. I would like to express my deep thanks to the Moravian Church, which is historically so closely affiliated with the teachings of Jan Hus, for their cooperation in organising the series of events, in Cape Town, Pretoria, Genadendal and Port Elizabeth. Allow me also thank to the Faculty of Theology of the University of Pretoria for their partnership. -
ISSUE 6 December 2007
ISSUE 6 December 2007 The Flag Institute wishes all its members a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year and is pleased to welcome you to issue 6 of eFlags. As always any comments or suggestions would be gratefully received at [email protected] THE FLAG OF SAUDI ARABIA page 2 The FLAG HISTORY OF SAUDI ARABIA Oleg Tarnovsky Page 3 FLAG INSTITUTE NEWS page 6 FLAGS IN THE NEWS page 7 SITES OF SPECIAL VEXILLILOGICAL INTEREST page 9 MEMBERS’ CHALLENGES Obscure ‘Royal’ Standard of the Season…. page 9 New New Zealand page 10 A Flag for a Union page 11 HOW TO GET IN TOUCH WITH THE INSTITUTE page 12 1 The Flag of Saudi Arabia Following the recent State Visit of the King of Saudi Arabia (which was marred by the fact that one half of the flags along the ceremonial route to Buckingham Palace where flying upside down!).We thought it may be of some interest to have a closer examination of this most enigmatic and religiously charged of national flags. Although in its basic form it has been in use since the 1920s, the flag was not officially adopted and the exact design was not specified until 15 th March 1973. It features a white Arabic inscription and sword on a green background. It is the Holy nature of this inscription, known as the shahada 1 which defines the need for special respect beyond that normally accredited to a national flag. Indeed under Saudi Legislation it can not be flown at half mast, nor vertically, and it needs to be made in such a way that the inscription reads correctly on both sides, but the sword must always point away from the staff.