DOCSLIB.ORG

Turkey Power Sector Coal Demand Outlook Strengthens in 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Turkey Power Sector Coal Demand Outlook Strengthens in 2020 Argus White Paper: Turkey power sector coal demand outlook strengthens in 2020 Domestic plant suspensions may boost Turkish coal-fi red power generation in 2020, while a new Russian export port in the Black Sea has the potential to shift utilities’ buying preferences in the seaborne market Coal demand outlook boosted by domestic outages more strongly in the region when the new Taman port in the Turkish coal-fi red power generation fell by around 200MW Black Sea starts handling Capesize vessels. on the year to 69GW in 2019 and reduced the power sector’s NAR 5,700 kcal/kg-equivalent coal consumption to 22.24mn t Coal to remain ahead of gas in 2020 from 22.85mn t in 2018, according to Argus calculations. The Coal-fi red generation moved ahead of gas in the merit order year-on-year decline in coal-fi red generation was a result of in Turkey in August 2018, when state-owned gas distribu- record-high hydropower output, which gained by 3.3GW on the tion company Botas amended its domestic pricing scheme to year to 10.1GW last year. reflect the increase in its import costs. Renewable capacity will continue to grow in 2020, but the out- Coal-fi red utilities have maintained a price advantage against look for coal-fi red generation has strengthened as restrictions gas-fi red units since that date. at plants that run on domestic thermal coal and lignite will likely boost the reliance on other thermal units. Coal is likely Turkey does not have an emissions tax mechanism, but coal- to benefi t more than gas from the suspensions, as seaborne fi red generators are required to pay an import tax when coal coal continues to hold a cost advantage over natural gas. prices fall below certain levels. The tax eff ectively fi xes fuel costs for coal-fi red utilities at around $70/t, equivalent to Colombia has historically catered to the majority of Turkish around $10/MWh. import demand, but Russian exporters may begin to compete Turkey power mix GW Turkey coal import tax 40 Turkey imposed a conditional levy on coal im- 35 ports for power generation in 2016. The tax is 30 triggered only when the Ice Rotterdam balance- 25 of-the month coal futures contract settles below 20 $70/t on the last working day of the week prior 15 to the coal’s clearing date from the customs. 10 When the contract settles below $70/t, the importer pays $70/t minus the value of swap 5 contract in additional duties, in addition to the 0 Jan-2018 May-2018 Sep-2018 Jan-2019 May-2019 Sep-2019 Jan-2020 cost of the coal cargo. Coal Gas Lignite Hydro Other Copyright © 2020 Argus Media group - www.argusmedia.com - All rights reserved. Trademark notice: ARGUS, the ARGUS logo, ARGUS MEDIA, ARGUS DIRECT, Coal ARGUS OPEN MARKETS, AOM, FMB, DEWITT, JIM JORDAN & ASSOCIATES, JJ&A, FUNDALYTICS, METAL-PAGES, METALPRICES.COM, Argus publication titles and Argus illuminating the markets index names are trademarks of Argus Media Limited. Argus White Paper: Turkey power sector coal demand outlook strengthens in 2020 Y-o-Y coal, gas output vs margins TWh, $/MWh Renewable additions in 2020 With coal-fired generation firmly embedded ahead of gas in 4 Coal Gas Dark spread 40pc Spark spread 55pc 30 the Turkish merit order, rising renewable capacity presents 3 25 the only significant downside risk alongside the coronavirus 2 20 outbreak’s possible impact on power demand for coal-fired 1 15 generation in the near term. 0 10 -1 Turkish renewable capacity has grown steadily in recent years 5 -2 and reduced the country’s reliance on thermal generation. 0 -3 Annual growth in renewable capacity averaged 3GW, or 8pc, in -4 -5 2016-19, with the aggregate share of hydroelectric, wind and -5 -10 solar output in the Turkish generation mix rising by 10 percent- Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2020 age points to 41pc over this three-year period. This caps the outright margins available to coal-fired units Renewable capacity growth slowed in 2018-19 but is expected when seaborne prices fall below $70/t, as in 2019, but returns to rebound sharply in 2020 as state-owned hydraulic works for coal-fired generation remain attractive and more competi- administration DSI is planning to bring 1.7GW of hydroelectric tive than for gas. capacity on line this year . In 2019, the tax-adjusted month-ahead dark spread for 40pc The biggest addition to the country’s hydro fleet, the 1.2GW efficient coal-fired units averaged $21.76/MWh. Ilisu plant, located in the hydro-rich area of Euphrates in the Tigris basin, is expected to start generating power in the Generation costs for gas-fired units were much higher in 2019, second quarter of 2020. The plant has been building hydro as the country secures most of its gas through long-term reserves since the second half of 2019. oil-linked supply contracts, which restricted utilities’ ability to take advantage of lower spot LNG prices last year. Month- Generation from the 517MW Cetin dam in Siirt might also ahead spark spreads for 55pc gas-fired units stood at $2.62/ start later this year, after the facility started to build reserves MWh last year, using state-run gas utility Botas’ regulated in early 2020. tariff for utilities. The timeline for the other projects is less certain, but they Botas’ import costs for Russia, the biggest pipeline supplier are also likely to come on line over the next two-year period. to Turkey, were around $24/MWh ($6.71/mn Btu) for the first The 560MW Yusufeli dam in Artvin is 70pc complete, and the quarter of 2020 and, even though the cost may fall further in 500MW Lower Kalekoy dam achieved substantial completion the second quarter to around $22/MWh, gas is likely to remain in the first few weeks of 2020. uncompetitive with coal for power generation, as long as Bo- tas’ regulated tariff for utilities reflects import costs. Capacity additions from other renewable sources were moder- ated last year amid uncertainty about the future of the coun- The recent steep drop in oil prices will not translate to a try’s renewable support scheme, Yekdem, and growth is not similar level of decrease in Botas’ import costs of Russian gas expected to recover significantly in 2020. Overall additions of later this year, as the long-term agreement also has clauses wind, solar and geothermal capacity fell to 1.7GW last year, that soften the impact on lower oil prices fall below $50/bl. compared with 2.38GW in 2018, according to data from grid Botas gas tariff vs import costs $/’000 m³ Turkey renewable capacity by year GW 50 Botas regulated tariff Botas calculated cost of Russian gas imports Hydro Solar Wind Geothermal 350 45 40 300 35 250 30 200 25 20 150 15 100 10 5 50 0 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Jan-2018 May-2018 Sep-2018 Jan-2019 May-2019 Sep-2019 Jan-2020 argusmedia.com 2 Copyright © 2020 Argus Media group Argus White Paper: Turkey power sector coal demand outlook strengthens in 2020 operator Teias. New installations of solar plants, which made Output at restricted domestic coal units GW up majority of the renewable additions under the Yekdem scheme, fell to 924MW from 1.64GW in 2018. 2.5 2 The Yekdem scheme offers renewable energy investors state- backed power purchase guarantees for 10 years, but is set to 1.5 expire at the end of 2020. Renewable plants completed after this date will therefore not be able to benefit from the favour- 1 able rates offered to investors through the scheme. 0.5 Details about a new scheme to replace Yekdem have not been announced yet, but the government is working on a draft law 0 to extend the mechanism with a lower guaranteed purchase Jan-2019 Mar-2019 May-2019 Jul-2019 Sep-2019 Nov-2019 Jan-2020 price than in the current scheme. Afsin-Elbistan-A Kangal Seyitomer Soma-B Tuncbilek Catalagzi The government also initiated the Yeka scheme as an alterna- plants may offset the growth in hydroelectric and solar genera- tive to Yekdem, which was meant to boost renewable capacity tion. The government has suspended the operating licenses of by holding tenders for larger scale projects. A 1GW tender was around 3.4GW of domestic thermal coal and lignite-fired plants awarded in 2017, and despite facing some initial delays, the that failed to meet the required environmental standards. But project is expected to be completed by 2021. the majority of the Turkish lignite-fired units run with low load factors in the country, which implies the drop in lignite genera- The government is now planning to widen the scope of the tion is likely to be smaller than the restricted capacity. Yeka scheme by including smaller scale projects to attract more investors. An auction for 10-50MW solar units in about Output from the 1.3GW Afsin Elbistan A unit — the plant with 40 cities with strong irradiance potential is expected to be the highest capacity among the shut down units — was only held in the second quarter of this year. 217MW last year, implying an utilisation rate of 16pc, and the country’s lignite-fired fleet generation stood at 5.3GW in 2019, But the Turkish government is planning to introduce lira-based implying an utilisation rate of 53pc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation on Turkey's Transboundary Waters
    Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Status Report commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety F+E Project No. 903 19 226 Oktober 2005 Imprint Authors: Aysegül Kibaroglu Axel Klaphake Annika Kramer Waltina Scheumann Alexander Carius Project management: Adelphi Research gGmbH Caspar-Theyß-Straße 14a D – 14193 Berlin Phone: +49-30-8900068-0 Fax: +49-30-8900068-10 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.adelphi-research.de Publisher: The German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety D – 11055 Berlin Phone: +49-01888-305-0 Fax: +49-01888-305 20 44 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmu.de © Adelphi Research gGmbH and the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, 2005 Cooperation on Turkey's transboundary waters i Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 1.1 Motive and main objectives ........................................................................................1 1.2 Structure of this report................................................................................................3 2 STRATEGIC ROLE OF WATER RESOURCES FOR THE TURKISH ECONOMY..........5 2.1 Climate and water resources......................................................................................5 2.2 Infrastructure development.........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon/Dams/Page 1
    salmon/dams/page 1 Yusufeli dam and the river Çoruh: an indefinable asset (1200 words) “Neither you, nor I, nor anyone else, knew it well enough to insist that at all costs it should endure.” Thus David Brower, founder of Friends of the Earth, looking back on the damming of the Colorado River’s Glen Canyon in the USA in 1963. If the Colorado River was not well enough known, what chance does the Çoruh in north-eastern Turkey stand? Two dams are already operational; another twenty-seven are planned. The biggest and most environmentally destructive will be close to the little town of Yusufeli. Does it matter? Turkey needs more power. First, the area is one of outstanding natural beauty: “one of those existing but perhaps indefinable assets” that Turkey has been all too ready to destroy in its gallop to match European standards of living, as Brian Sewell puts it in his Turkish travelogue, South from Ephesus. The Çoruh marks the southern limit of the Kaçkar mountains that drop into the Black Sea behind the legendary town of Trebizond. Its gorges form a little corridor of Mediterranean warmth that makes possible even the growing of olives. Downstream from Yusufeli the gorges are rocky and narrow. Upstream the alluvial banks support rice paddies and stands of poplars, the emblematic tree of central Asia. And high on the slopes of these valleys, where the forest gives way to flower-strewn meadows, are tiny villages of stone and wooden chalets, whose inhabitants, some permanent, some seasonal, live in semi-self- sufficiency from their cows, fruit trees, honey and vegetable gardens – and, to a growing extent, from the slowly burgeoning, eco-friendly and sustainable tourism of walkers, nature-lovers and white-water rafters who come for the Çoruh rapids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Methods Used in Monitoring of Large Dams in Turkey
    ©2020 Published in 8th International Symposium on Innovative Technologies in Engineering and Science 23-25 October 2020 (ISITES2020 Bursa - Turkey) https://doi.org/10.33793/acperpro.03.01.51 The Methods Used in Monitoring of Large Dams in Turkey Haluk BALI1*, Salih ALCAY2 1 The General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, 5. Regional Directorate, 56. Division Office, Kırıkkale, Turkey, 2 Necmettin Erbakan University, Engineering and Achitecture Faculty, Geomatics Engineering Department, Konya, Turkey. Abstract Turkey is a very rich country in terms of water resources. However, in order to use these resources efficiently, water must be stored safely. In this context, the best form of storage is the construction of dams. In our country, large dams, which are among the world's important dams, are being built. Although there are many advantages of large dams, the loss of life and property will be so great in case of a possible deformation or destruction. The fact that dams are under the influence of various forces, as well as being located in the earthquake zone of our country, necessitates continuous monitoring of our dams. Dams are generally monitored using geodetic methods and geotechnical devices. However, mostly details of these two methods are evaluated separately in dam monitoring. Evaluating the results of both methods together is very important for the comprehensive monitoring of the dam and the correct interpretation of possible deformations. In this study, large dams in our country and monitoring studies carried out by using geodetic and geotechnical methods in these dams are given in detail. Key words: Dam, Deformation Monitoring, Geodetic, Geotechnical 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Master Plan Study on Participatory Watershed Rehabilitation in Coruh River in the Republic of Turkey
    JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) REPUBLIC OF TURKEY, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTRY (MEF) THE MASTER PLAN STUDY ON PARTICIPATORY WATERSHED REHABILITATION IN CORUH RIVER IN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY FINAL REPORT APPENDIX JANUARY, 2004 PACIFIC CONSULTANTS INTERNATIONAL RECS INTERNATIONAL INC. ExchangeRate (August, 2003) US$ 1.00 = TL 1,500,000 TL 1,000,000 = US$ 0.67 US$ 1.00 = Yen 120 THE MASTER PLAN STUDY ON PARTICIPATORY WATERSHED REHABILITATION IN CORUH RIVER IN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY FINAL REPORT APPENDIX CONTENTS A Natural Conditions and Soil Conservation B Forest Resources and Forest Management C Socio-Economic Conditions D Agriculture E Livestock and Rangeland Management F Institution G Environmental Considerations H Remote Sensing and GIS I Project Monitoring and Evaluation J Micro-Catchment Planning and the Master Plan A. Natural Conditions and Soil Conservation CONTENTS A.1 INTRODUCTION A1.1 The Purpose of this Working Paper A- 1 A1.2 Field Studies A- 1 A1.3 Data Collection A- 2 A1.4 Responsible State Agencies A- 2 A1.5 Forest Villages and Soil Conservation A- 2 A.2 NATURAL CONDITIONS IN THE CORUH RIVER CATCHMENT A2.1 Topography A- 4 A2.2 Climate A- 8 A2.3 Geology A-12 A2.4 Hydrology A-17 A2.5 Soils A-20 A2.6 Land Capability A-27 A2.7 Soil Erosion A-29 A2.8 Correlations between Slopes, Geology, Soils, Land Capability and Soil Erosion in the Coruh River Catchment A-38 A2.9 Dams and Sedimentation A-41 A.3 ISSUES, POLICIES, STRATEGIES, MEASURES, CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SOIL CONSERVATION IN THE CORUH RIVER
    [Show full text]
  • VI. International Symposium on Ecology and Environmental Problems
    th 6 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS VI. International Symposium on Ecology and Environmental Problems Ali Erdoğan, Tamer Albayrak, Kani Işık (Editorial Board) VI. International Symposium on Ecology and Environmental Problems 17-20 November 2011 Antalya, Turkey i ii VI. International Symposium on Ecology and Environmental Problems PLEASE NOTE: Symposium Chairman Prof. Dr. İlhami KIZIROGLU, at age 67, will retire from his academic position at Hacettepe University on November 20, 2011, which is the same day as the termination date of the Symposium. As it was the case during his productive academic years, we wish successful, happy and healthy years to Professor Kiziroglu during his retirement years as well. A short resume of Professor Kiziroğlu is presented below. Symposium Organizing Committee Resume of Professor Dr. İLHAMİ KİZİROĞLU İlhami Kiziroğlu, born in Elazığ/Harput, graduated from Istanbul University, having a Senior Forest Engineering diploma in 1968. He has been awarded a scholarship and went to Germany for his masters and doctorate studies. He carried out his pre-doctorate study on spiders at the “Institut für angewandte Zoologie” in Munich Ludwigs- Maximillian University. While he was conducting his doctorate study on Nature Protection with Ecological context under Professor W. Schwenke, he was also appointed as technical assistant at the same department. Dr Kizioğlu completed his doctorate study in 1976, and this study was published in an “A” class journal in the form of three articles. During his doctorate study, Dr Kiziroglu participated in an international project on “Negative Impacts of Pesticides on Nature and Plants and Their Accumulation”, which was published upon completion.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asian Dams at a Tipping Point? the Case of Tipaimukh Dam in Manipur, India
    www.water-alternatives.org Volume 14 | Issue 2 Somokanta, T.; Feitelson, E. and Tubi, A. 2021. South Asian dams at a tipping point? The case of Tipaimukh Dam in Manipur, India. Water Alternatives 14(2): 491-519 South Asian Dams at a Tipping Point? The Case of Tipaimukh Dam in Manipur, India Thounaojam Somokanta Department of Geography, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; [email protected] Eran Feitelson Department of Geography, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; [email protected] Amit Tubi Department of Geography, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; [email protected] ABSTRACT: While dam building has declined in most developed economies, it has seen an increase in emerging economies, particularly in East and South Asia. Even there, however, such dams are facing mounting opposition. This raises the prospect that dam building is nearing a global tipping point. In this study, we examine the case of the Tipaimukh Dam in Manipur, one of the states in India's peripheral northeast. We ask how such a major project was stopped despite support from powerful national- and regional-level actors. To analyse this case, we build on the Advocacy Coalition Framework and the analytical concepts of growth coalitions and discourse coalitions. The joint application of these concepts enables us to link global advocacy coalitions with local pro- and anti-growth coalitions through the storylines they advance, thereby formulating multiscalar discourse coalitions. This allows us to follow the struggles between pro-dam and anti-dam coalitions, as well as trace the shifts in the composition and focus of coalitions over the 75 years since the Tipaimukh Dam was first proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • International Obligations to Consult
    INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS TO CONSULT FACT FINDING MISSION TO SYRIA / IRAK Febr.2002 Acknowledgements The Mission would like to thank the following for their valuable assistance to the delegation: Mr Mohammed Radwan Martini, Minister of Irrigation, Syrian Arab Republic; Dr Abdul Aziz Al Masri, Chief of the International Water Bureau, Ministry of Irrigation, Syrian Arab Republic; Mr Waleed Mu’alim, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs, Syrian Arab Republic; Mr Yahia Awaidah, Director, Environmental Management Directorate, Ministry of the Environment, Syrian Arab Republic; Mr Adnan Khsan, Minister of the Environment, Syrian Arab Republic; Mr Amin Sabbagh, Commercial Officer, British Embassy, Damascus; Mr Rasoul Abdul Hussein, Minister of Irrigation, Republic of Iraq; Dr Ali Farhan, Deputy Minister of Irrigation, Republic of Iraq; Dr Waleed, Hydrologist, Ministry of Irrigation, Republic of Iraq; Dr Amer Suleiman, Ministry of Irrigation, Republic of Iraq; Mr Fahmi Al Qaisy, Head of the Legal Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Iraq; Dr Mudhafar Amin, Head of Iraqi Interests Section, Jordanian Embassy, London; Embassy of Syria, London; Saad Al Samarrai, Head of the Water Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Iraq. 1 CONTENTS SUMMARY 4 SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND AND REMIT 7 SECTION TWO: CONTESTED WATERS - THE TIGRIS AND EUPHRATES 9 - DAMS AND CONFLICT 9 - THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF WATER SCARCITY 11 - DAMS AND CONFLICT ON THE TIGRIS AND EUPHRATES 13 - THE GAP PROJECT 15 - GAP: SYRIAN AND IRAQI CONCERNS 19 Decreased
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Coruh Basin
    CORUH RIVER DEVELOPMENT PLAN International Workshop on Transboundary Water Resources Management Tbilisi, Georgia 8-10 December 2009 Ubeyd Sezer Geological Engineer U. Sezer GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF STATE HYDRAULIC WORKS (DSI), TURKEY 1/17 CORUH RIVER BASIN The Coruh (or Chorokhi in Georgian) River Basin located in the NE part of Turkey, near the boundary between Turkey and Georgia It rises from the Mescit Mountain Range (highest peak 3255 m) in Turkey and flows into the Black Sea in Batumi, Georgia U. Sezer GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF STATE HYDRAULIC WORKS (DSI), TURKEY 2/17 Çoruh Basin Catchment's Area (approximately) In Turkey 19 872 km2 In Georgia 2,090 km 2 Mean Annual Water Potential 6,824 hm 3 Annual Sediment Load 5,8 million m³ Total length of the river 431 km In Turkey 410 km In Georgia 21km U. Sezer GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF STATE HYDRAULIC WORKS (DSI), TURKEY 3/17 CORUH RIVER BASIN CLIMATE • The Climate of the Coruh River Basin is continental and Black Sea climatic conditions • Climate varies greatly due to; • high mean elevation of the land (1 132 m) and • the influence of the mountainous areas running parallel to the coast line • Mean annual rainfalls varies between 250 mm- 2650 mm U. Sezer GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF STATE HYDRAULIC WORKS (DSI), TURKEY 4/17 PRECIPITATION i r h e N h u r o i Ç s e r e D k ı c n a d y Sundura Deresi e M İçkale Deresi resi l De iske Şa ev ı vş at ı D y De y a res i a Ç i s Ç a e l t r u er e rg B D u e M r t s i p 2600mm -2650 mm a K Çayı Bulanık 685mm-700 mm i r h e N h u r ı o y Ç a Ç l a h r a B KS (DSI), TURKEY 5/17 Oltu Çayı i r h ı 250mm-300 mm e y N a Ç h u r o m u Ç t r o T iir r p ss İİ U.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Develpment in Turkey
    HYDROPOWER DEVELPMENT IN TURKEY By NECATİ AĞIRALİOĞLU 21 JANUARY 2016 • 1. Turkey • 2. History of Development • 3. Water Resources • 4. World Hydro Power potential • 5. Turkey’s Water Potential • 6. Types of hydroelectric production, • 7. Sectors in hydroelectric production • 8. Largest Hydro power plants • 9. Developed Hydro potential • 10. Cost • 11. Law Turkey • Area: 783,600 km² • Population: 78,151,750 (2015) • Installed hydropower capacity: 43,1331 MW (megawatt) (2015) • Hydropower generation: 67 billion kWh (2015) HISTORY • The first hydroelectric plant in Turkey was constructed at Tarsus in 1902. • This plant only produced 60 kW, but nonetheless was a great technical achievement for the country. HISTORY • In later years there were many more projects including: Seyhan, Sariyer, Hirfanli, Kesikköprü, Demirköprü, and Kemer. • These projects were either dams or hydroelectric power plants and by 1940 there were a total of 28 hydroelectric power plants in Turkey. • After the State Hydraulic Works (DSI) was established in 1954 projects were better funded and the power produced per year was greatly increased. World Hydropower Potential • According to the Hydropower & Dams Atlas (H & D, 1999), world hydro potential is as follow: • Gross hydro potential: 40,500 TWh/year • Technically feasible: 14,300 TWh/year • Economically feasible: 8,100 TWh/year Currently, only four facilities over 10 GW (10,000 MW) are in operation worldwide Capacity Rank Station Country Location (MW) 1. Three Gorges Dam China 22,500 30°49′15″N 111°00′08″E Brazil 2. Itaipu Dam 25°24′31″S 54°35′21″W 14,000 Paraguay 3. Xiluodu Dam China 13,860 28°15′35″N 103°38′58″E 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Construction in Turkey and Its Impact on Economic, Cultural and Social Rights
    Submission to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights for its 46th Session, 2 – 20 May 2011 Dam construction in Turkey and its impact on economic, cultural and social rights Parallel report in response to the Initial Report by the Republic of Turkey on the Implementation of the International Covenant On Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Submitted on 14 March 2011 by CounterCurrent – GegenStrömung In cooperation with: Association for Assistance and Solidarity with Sarıkeçili Yuruks Çoruh Basin Environment Conservation Union Doga Dernegi Free Munzur Initiative Green Artvin Society Initiative to Keep Hasankeyf Alive Platform for the Protection of Yuvarlakçay (YKP) Yelda KULLAP, Lawyer, Member of the Allianoi Initiative Group The submitting organisation expresses its gratitude for their support to: Brot für die Welt FIAN International IPPNW – International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War / Physicians for Social Responsibility, German Section Table of contents page Information on submitting organisations 3 Maps and Photo Credits 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 8 1. Comment on the state party’s reply to question no. 26 in the list 9 of issues (E/C.12/TUR/Q/1) 2. Economic, social and cultural rights and dam building in Tur- 12 key 2.1 The right to an adequate standard of living (Art. 11) 12 2.1.1 The State party’s Legislation and the right to an adequate standard of living 12 2.1.1.1 Turkish legislation on expropriation 12 2.1.1.2 Turkish legislation on resettlement 14 2.1.1.3 Turkish legislation on the environment 16 2.1.2 Case Studies 19 2.1.2.1 Case Study 1: The Ilısu Dam 19 2.1.2.2 Case Study 2: The Munzur Valley 22 2.1.2.3 Case Study 3: The Çoruh River 23 2.1.2.4 Case Study 4: The Yortanlı Dam 25 2.1.2.5 Case Study 5: HEPP Construction on the Yuvarlakçay River 26 2.1.2.6 Case Study 6: Impacts on the Nomadic Population 28 2.1.2.7 Case Study 7: Impacts on Biodiversity 29 2.1.3 The State party’s extraterritorial obligations 31 2.2 The right to the highest attainable standard of health (Art.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Full Paper Template
    International Balkans Conference on Challenges of Civil Engineering, BCCCE, 19-21 May 2011, EPOKA University, Tirana, ALBANIA. Development of hydropower energy in two adjacent basins (northeast of turkey) Adem Akpınar1, Murat İhsan Kömürcü2, Murat Kankal2, Hızır Önsoy2 1Department of Civil Engineering, Gümüşhane University, Gümüşhane, Turkey 2Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey ABSTRACT The main objective in doing the present study is to investigate the sustainable development of hydropower plants in two adjacent basins being located in northeast of Turkey, which are the Çoruh river basin being the least problem river of Turkey in respect to international cooperation as compared with Turkey’s other trans-boundary waters and the Eastern Black Sea Basin (EBSB) having great advantages from the view point of small hydropower potential or hydropower potential without storage among 25 hydrological basins in Turkey. The contribution of the hydropower energy potential in these basins to reconstruction of Turkey electricity structure is investigated and a comparison in between is carried out. Finally, it is found that the EBSB will be corresponded from 8.3% and 10.3% of nowadays total electricity energy production and net electricity consumption of Turkey, while Çoruh river basin will provide 7.40% and 9.19% of total electric generation and electricity consumption of Turkey, respectively, after all hydropower projects within these basins are commissioned. In other words, one-fifth of Turkey’s electricity consumption will be met from northeast of Turkey. For this reason, development studies and investments in the hydropower sector should be encouraged and supported and projects within these basins should be put into operation as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]