DOCSLIB.ORG

Security, at What Cost? Quantifying People’S Trade-Offs Across Liberty, Privacy and Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Security, at What Cost? Quantifying People’S Trade-Offs Across Liberty, Privacy and Security THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. Reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope; present discus- sions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research profes- sionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for re- search quality and objectivity. Security, At What Cost? Quantifying people’s trade-offs across liberty, privacy and security Neil Robinson, Dimitris Potoglou, Chong Woo Kim, Peter Burge, Richard Warnes Sponsored by the RAND Europe Board of Trustees EUROPE The research described in this report was sponsored by the RAND Europe Board of Trustees. The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2010 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html). Published 2010 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, United Kingdom RAND URL: http://www.rand.org RAND Europe URL: http://www.rand.org/randeurope To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface The heightened security environment in the United Kingdom today is resplendent with examples of government policy that must strike a delicate balance between strengthening security without jeopardising public liberties and personal privacy. The introduction of national identity cards and biometric passports, the expansion of the national DNA database and cross-departmental sharing of personal data raise a number of privacy issues. Human rights may also be suspended by the exercise of stop-and-search powers by the police or detention of suspects prior to a trial. However, much of the current civil liberties versus security debate is adversarial and little robust research informs these arguments. This report outlines the results of a study that sought to understand objectively the real privacy, liberty and security trade-offs of individuals, so that policymakers can be better informed about individuals’ true preferences in this area, and the true nature of the balance between privacy and civil liberties may be understood. RAND Europe is an independent not-for-profit policy research organisation which aims to improve policy and decision-making in the public interest, through research and analysis. RAND Europe’s clients include European governments, institutions, non-governmental organisations and firms with a need for rigorous, independent, multidisciplinary analysis. This study was conducted with internal investment from the RAND Corporation. This report has been peer reviewed in accordance with RAND’s quality assurance standards. For more information about RAND Europe or this document, please contact: Neil Robinson Dimitris Potoglou RAND Europe RAND Europe Westbrook Centre Westbrook Centre Milton Road Milton Road Cambridge CB4 1YG Cambridge CB4 1YG United Kingdom United Kingdom Tel. +44 1223 353329 Tel. +44 1223 353329 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] iii Contents Preface........................................................................................................................ iii Table of figures............................................................................................................ix Table of tables .............................................................................................................xi Summary.................................................................................................................. xiii Methodology..............................................................................................................xv Case studies......................................................................................................xv Conclusion ..............................................................................................................xviii Acknowledgements....................................................................................................xxi CHAPTER 1 Introduction.....................................................................................1 1.1 Individual rights and freedoms .......................................................................... 1 1.1.1 The case for reconciliation of these rights in favour of security............. 2 1.1.2 The case against reconciliation of these rights in favour of security ................................................................................................ 3 1.1.3 Examples where these factors affect each other ..................................... 4 1.1.4 Security versus privacy and liberty: the metaphor of balance? ............... 5 1.2 Policy challenges................................................................................................ 6 1.2.1 The process of assessing risk and balance of investment........................ 6 1.2.2 Challenges to these approaches ............................................................ 8 1.3 Existing literature on understanding behaviour, concerns and views in this field................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Use of stated preference methods..................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 2 Methodology..................................................................................15 2.1 Stated preference discrete choice experiments .................................................. 15 2.2 Literature review.............................................................................................. 17 2.2.1 Policy measures or interventions affecting liberty, privacy and security .............................................................................................. 17 2.2.2 Semi-structured interviews................................................................. 19 2.2.3 Constructing the utility framework.................................................... 19 2.2.4 Devising choice contexts.................................................................... 20 2.2.5 Identifying Attributes and Levels........................................................ 22 2.3 Case study 1: Applying for a passport .............................................................. 23 2.4 Case study 2: Travelling on the national rail network ...................................... 26 v Security: at what cost? RAND Europe 2.5 Case study 3: Attending a major public event .................................................. 29 2.6 Background questions...................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 3 Descriptive analysis........................................................................ 33 3.1 Implementation of the survey and distribution of the sample........................... 33 3.2 Trading behaviour in stated preference choices ................................................ 34 3.3 Checking understanding of choices.................................................................. 35 CHAPTER 4 Modelling of the stated preference data.........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Guaranteeing the Rights of EU Nationals Isn't Politics – It's Cruelty
    LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog: Five minutes with Shami Chakrabarti: “Not guaranteeing the rights of EU nationals isn’t politics – it’s Page 1 of 3 cruelty” Five minutes with Shami Chakrabarti: “Not guaranteeing the rights of EU nationals isn’t politics – it’s cruelty” In October 2016, the leader of the UK’s Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, appointed Shami Chakrabarti as Shadow Attorney General for England and Wales. In a discussion with British Politics and Policy editor Artemis Photiadou and EUROPP’s Tena Prelec, she reflects on the challenges and advantages of the position, the situation faced by EU citizens living in the UK, and the key issues on the horizon for British politics. How have you found the transition from being a high-profile practitioner to being a frontline politician? It’s a major transition even though I was a very public practitioner and a very activist practitioner, and at times saying very difficult things, during the War on Terror for example. Even so, becoming partisan at this moment, when the referendum campaign was happening and when there was a lot of strife within the Labour Party, was quite something. And, of course, our media is not exactly the most kind or fair – the difficult transition is about learning to wear more armour emotionally. It’s really the temperature of the scrutiny – and sometimes abuse – that was possibly the bigger challenge. In terms of the actual skillsets and work, that doesn’t seem such a difficult transition. Because solving legal problems and applying law to policy is something I was reasonably familiar with first as a government lawyer, then as a human rights lawyer, and then as Director of Liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • For Effective Parliamentary Liberty Has a Strong Reputation Ork and Lobbying, We Make Campaigning
    www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk Liberty has a strong reputation for effective parliamentary campaigning. Through policy work and lobbying, we make the arguments that matter in the corridors of Westminster to MPs of all parties. We strive to hold the government to account by undertaking groundbreaking test case litigation and high profile media campaigns. As a result, we are now an essential voice in the national political debate. But that’s just the public side of the story. This work is only possible because of people like you, who care about protecting civil liberties and promoting human rights. You can help make effective campaigning possible by writing to your MP, signing petitions and debating with your friends. Even more importantly, join Liberty as a member and provide the vital support that keeps us going. This campaign guide is about making action count. It provides you with advice on how best to lobby and raise awareness of the important issues we face today. Like charity, human rights start at home. Our Common Values campaign is all about increasing respect for human rights and countering the negative myths. As a Liberty supporter, you are the key to helping us achieve this. We hope this guide will help. Shami Chakrabarti, Director of Liberty Promote Uphold d respect for justice an human rights the rule and civil liberties of law dvance h ct A r nd muc Prote ights fo a r le ore... privacy and ulnerab m v es free speech minoriti Liberty – Then and Now For the best part of a century, Liberty and our members have acted as the conscience of a nation, fighting injustice and placing principle above populism when others have faltered.
    [Show full text]
  • A Surveillance Society?
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee A Surveillance Society? Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 May 2008 HC 58-I [Incorporating HC 508-i–iv, Session 2006–07] Published on 8 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chairman) Tom Brake MP (Liberal Democrat, Charshalton and Wallington) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Regent’s Park and Kensington North) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) David TC Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Patrick Mercer MP (Conservative, Newark) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Martin Salter MP (Labour, Reading West) Mr Gary Streeter MP (Conservative, South West Devon) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the inquiry: Rt Hon John Denham MP (Labour, Southampton Itchen) Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Liberal Democrat, Taunton) Mr Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Keir Starmer's Shadow Cabinet
    Keir Starmer’s Shadow Cabinet Member of Parliament Shadow Cabinet Position Kier Starmer Leader of the Opposition Angela Rayner Deputy Leader and Chair of the Labour Party Anneliese Dodds Chancellor of the Exchequer Lisa Nandy Foreign Secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds Home Secretary Rachel Reeves Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster David Lammy Justice Secretary John Healey Defence Secretary Ed Miliband Business, Energy and Industrial Secretary Emily Thornberry International Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds Work and Pensions Secretary Jonathan Ashworth Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Rebecca Long-Bailey Education Secretary Jo Stevens Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Bridget Philipson Chief Secretary to the Treasury Luke Pollard Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary Steve Reed Communities and Local Government Secretary Thangam Debbonaire Housing Secretary Jim McMahon Transport Secretary Preet Kaur Gill International Development Secretary Louise Haigh Northern Ireland Secretary (interim) Ian Murray Scotland Secretary Nia Griffith Wales Secretary Marsha de Cordova Women and Equalities Secretary Andy McDonald Employment Rights and Protections Secretary Rosena Allin-Khan Minister for Mental Health Cat Smith Minister for Young People and Voter Engagement Lord Falconer Attorney General Valerie Vaz Leader of the House Nick Brown Opposition Chief Whip Baroness Smith Shadow Leader of the Lords Lord McAvoy Lords’ Opposition Chief Whip Prepared by DevoConnect, April 2020. For more information contact [email protected] Keir
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Shami Chakrabarti to the Chair of the Committee, 16 August 2016
    Letter from Shami Chakrabarti to the Chair of the Committee, 16 August 2016 Thank you for your letter of congratulations dated 8 August 2016 which was sent whilst I was away on holiday. I accepted the Leader of the Opposition's nomination for the former Prime Minister's resignation list after the publication of the report into antisemitism and all forms of racism in the Labour Party. I chaired the Inquiry as a party member but came under no pressure or undue influence. Further the Inquiry reached highly critical conclusions independent of any person, faction or structure within Labour. To suggest, as reported in sections of the press, that the Inquiry was a corrupt "whitewash" is deeply insulting and completely untrue. Finally, I look forward to working with you, both in your capacity as one of the country's senior BAME MPs and in your role as a member of the National Executive of the Labour Party on the implementation of the Inquiry's report. Letter from the Chair of the Committee to Shami Chakrabarti, 16 August 2016 Thank you so much for your letter of 16 August. However, I am sorry that the information you have provided does not fully answer the question that was asked. For completeness and clarity I would be grateful if you would answer the questions below: 1. The date that the prospect of this peerage was first discussed with you, or your office, by the Leader of the Labour Party, his office, or a Member of the Shadow Cabinet. 2. The date you were offered this peerage by the Leader of the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Andrew Marr Show, Shami Chakrabarti
    1 THE ANDREW MARR SHOW, SHAMI CHAKRABARTI THE ANDREW MARR SHOW, 26TH MAY, 2019 BARONESS SHAMI CHAKRABARTI, SHADOW ATTORNEY GENERAL AM: Isn’t the truth that you could, as the Labour Party, have done some kind of deal with Theresa May, if you’d really wanted to? And as the Labour Party you chose not to. Which means that that whole area of kind of a compromise so called soft Brexit is now completely off the table and the country has a binary choice of an election, which you want to get, or if you don’t get an election being taken straight towards no deal. SC: Well, I’d want an election for a whole number of reasons, not just to do with Brexit. 14 million people in poverty, according to the UN, would be a very good reasons for a General Election. And also I have to say that I don’t think the Conservatives can have their second unelected prime minister, Mrs May having lost David Cameron’s small majority and having had no personal mandate. And I don’t think we can have one of these hard Brexiteers come in after a coronation. The Tory party membership, I think, I haven’t seen very recent numbers, the Tory party membership is probably the equivalent of about two parliamentary constituencies. That is not enough to give a mandate to a prime minister or a vision for this country in my view. So yes, I want a General Election but you’re also quite right that we need to deal with this terrible issue of Brexit that has riven this country for the last three years.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Annual Report 2019
    Labour Party | Annual Report 2019 LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Treasurers’ Responsibilities . 54 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn . 5 Independent Auditor’s Report Introduction from Tom Watson . 7 to the members of the Labour Party . 55 Introduction from the General Secretary . 9 Consolidated income and expenditure account 2018/2019 National Executive Committee . 10 for the year ended 31 December 2018 . 57 NEC Committees . 12 Statements of comprehensive income Obituaries . 13 and changes in equity for the year ended NEC aims and objectives for 2019 . 14 31 December 2018 . 58 Consolidated balance sheet BY-ELECTIONS . 15 at 31 December 2018 . 59 Peterborough . 16 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year Newport West . 17 ended 31 December 2018 . 60 ELECTIONS 2019 . 19 Notes to Financial Statements . 61 Analysis . 20 APPENDICES . 75 Local Government Report . 23 Members of Shadow Cabinet LOOKING AHEAD: 2020 ELECTIONS . 25 and Opposition Frontbench . 76 The year ahead in Scotland . 26 Parliamentary Labour Party . 80 The year ahead in Wales . 27 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 87 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 29 Members of the Welsh Assembly . 88 Members and Supporters Members of the European Parliament . 89 Renewing our party and building an active Directly Elected Mayors . 90 membership and supporters network . 30 Members of the London Assembly . 91 Equalities . 31 Leaders of Labour Groups . 92 Labour Peers . 100 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 National Policy Forum Parliamentary Candidates endorsed NPF Report . 36 by the NEC at time of publication . 104 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 39 NEC Disputes . 107 International NCC Cases .
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Issue 91 Autumn 2012
    23015 Amicus 91 Autumn text.qxd:Text 5/12/12 12:05 Page 1 Contents Issue 91 Autumn 2012 THE POLITICS OF PRESS REGULATION “A sloppy, elephantine piece of work that relies on nobody Articles having the time to read it before taking sides.” This dismissal The Common European Sales Law proposal – European of Lord Justice Leveson’s four-volume report, An inquiry into Private law at the crossroads? 2 the culture, practices and ethics of the press (November 29, 2012), was delivered by Peter Preston, a former editor of the Interpreting the neW South African Companies Act: some Guardian and an influential figure in the world of newspaper challenges 12 journalism. Mr Preston’s Views are shared by many editors Institute News 15 and others within the media opposed to LeVeson’s central recommendation for the creation of an independent self- Articles (cont’d) regulatorY body underpinned by statute to regulate the press. Reducing overreliance on credit ratings; failing strategies Some have found the report much more to their liking, and the need to start from scratch 17 notably the Hacked Off campaign which represents those who consider themselves to have been Victims of abusive practices Cameras in the courts: why the prohibition occurred in by the press. Hacked Off wants Leveson to be implemented the UK 22 in full without delay, backed by a petition signed by over 100,000 people and supported by well-known figures such as the HarrY Potter author J K Rowling and entertainer Stephen The report is long and detailed, but even those who FrY.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Parliamentary Fellowship Celebrating 25 Years 1994-2019
    VISITING PARLIAMENTARY FELLOWSHIP CELEBRATING 25 YEARS 1994-2019 St Antony's College 1 Roger Goodman, Warden of St Antony’s At a recent breakfast with the students, it was decided that the College should do more to advertise what distinguished it from other colleges in Oxford. St Antony’s is: The Oxford college founded by a Frenchman The Oxford college with two Patron Saints (St Antony of Egypt and St Antony of Padua) The Oxford college where almost 90% of the 500 graduate students are from outside UK and the alumni come from 129 countries The Oxford college with international influence: ‘In the mid-2000s, 5% of the world’s foreign ministers had studied at St Antony’s’ (Nick Cohen, The Guardian, 8 Nov, 2015) The Oxford college mentioned in the novels of both John Le Carré and Robert Harris The Oxford college which holds the most weekly academic seminars and workshops The Oxford college with two award-winning new buildings in the past decade To this list can be added: St Antony’s is the Oxford college with a Visiting Parliamentary Fellowship (VPF). There is no other Oxford college that can boast such a list of parliamentarians responsible for a seminar programme over such a long period of time. The College is immensely proud of the Fellowship and greatly indebted to all those who have held it over the past 25 years. We were very grateful to those who have were able to come to the 25th anniversary celebration of the Fellowship programme at the House of Commons on 24 April 2019 and for the many generous letters from those who could not.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism in the UK
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Antisemitism in the UK Tenth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 13 October 2016 HC 136 Published on 16 October 2016 by authority of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership James Berry MP (Conservative, Kingston and Surbiton) Mr David Burrowes MP (Conservative, Enfield, Southgate) Nusrat Ghani MP (Conservative, Wealden) Mr Ranil Jayawardena MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) (Interim Chair) Stuart C. McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Naz Shah MP (Labour, Bradford West) Mr Chuka Umunna MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) [Victoria Atkins has been appointed to a Government post and is taking no further part in Committee activities. She will be formally discharged from the Committee by a Motion of the House, and a replacement appointed, in due course] The following were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Keir Starmer MP (Labour, Holborn and St Pancras) Anna Turley MP (Labour (Co-op), Redcar) Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Cabinet St Tom Watson 1 October 2018 Jeremy Corbyn Deputy Leader & Shadow Leader Secretary of State for Digital Culture, Media and Sport
    The Labour Party Shadow Cabinet st Tom Watson 1 October 2018 Jeremy Corbyn Deputy Leader & Shadow Leader Secretary of State for Digital Culture, Media and Sport Rebecca Long-Bailey John McDonnell Diane Abbot Emily Thornberry Jonathan Ashworth Shadow Chancellor Shadow Secretary of State Shadow Secretary of Shadow Home Secretary Shadow Foreign Secretary for Business, Energy and of the Exchequer Industrial Strategy State for Health Angela Rayner Kate Osamor Keir Starmer Richard Burgon Sue Hayman Shadow Secretary of Shadow Secretary of State for Shadow Secretary of Shadow Secretary of Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food State for Education International Development State for Exiting the EU State for Justice and Rural Affairs Dawn Butler Cat Smith Baroness Smith Valerie Vaz Jon Trickett Shadow Minister for Shadow Minister for Voter Shadow Leader of Shadow Leader of the Shadow Minister for Women and Equalities Engagement and Youth Affairs the House of Lords House of Commons the Cabinet Office John Healey Margaret Greenwood Andrew Gwynne Peter Dowd Christina Rees Shadow Secretary of Shadow Secretary of State Shadow Secretary of Shadow Chief Secretary Shadow Secretary State for Housing for Work and Pensions State for Communities to the Treasury of State for Wales Andy McDonald Ian Lavery Nick Brown Nia Griffith Shami Chakrabarti Shadow Secretary of Shadow Secretary of Shadow Attorney Party Chair Opposition Chief Whip State for Transport State for Defence General Produced by Barry Gardiner Barbara Keeley Lesley Laird Tony Lloyd www.faithaction.net Shadow Secretary of State Shadow Minister for Mental Shadow Secretary of Shadow Secretary of for International Trade Health and Social Care State for Scotland State for Northern Ireland Source: https://labour.org.uk/people/shadow-cabinet, accessed 01/10/18.
    [Show full text]