Please Click Here

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Please Click Here Executive Women in the Workplace Inquiry Building the Executive Pipeline of Talent EVIDENCE Mary Macleod MP and Dr Thérèse Coffey MP Conservative Women’s Forum Sponsored by June 2013 Contents Contents Corrected Oral Evidence - Session 1 .........................................................3 Monday 21st January 2013 Nigel Whitehead, Group MD Programmes & Support, BAE Systems PLC Marjorie Strachan, Group Talent, Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC Anna Fullerton-Batten, Talent Acquisition Lead, UK Staffing Team, Microsoft Corrected Oral Evidence - Session 2 ...................................................... 26 Tuesday 22nd January 2013 Kate Grussing, MD, Sapphire Partners Karoline Vinsrygg, Consultant, Egon Zehnder International Charlotte Crosswell, CEO, Nasdaq OMX NLX Rebecca Salt, Group Communications Director, Balfour Beatty PLC Jill May, former MD, UBS Corrected Oral Evidence - Session 3 ...................................................... 62 Wednesday 30th January 2013 Dr Heather McGregor, MD, Taylor Bennett Dominique Hainebach, MD, Renew Partners Ruby McGregor-Smith CBE, CEO, MITIE PLC N. James Charrington, Senior MD & Chairman EMEA, BlackRock Inc. Dr Nigel Wilson, CEO, Legal and General Group PLC Corrected Oral Evidence - Session 4 ...................................................... 94 Thursday 31st January 2013 Helena Morrissey CBE, Founder, 30% Club; CEO, Newton Investment Management Amanda Mackenzie, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer, Aviva PLC Peninah Thomson OBE, CEO, Mentoring Foundation Dr Emily Lawson, Partner & Co-author of Women Matter series, McKinsey & Co Ama Afrifa-Kyei, Advisor, Employee Engagement, Diversity & Inclusion, Deloitte LLP Louise Brett, Partner, Consulting, Deloitte LLP Corrected Oral Evidence - Session 5 ....................................................125 Thursday 7th February 2013 Alison Carnwath, Non-Executive Chairman, Land Securities PLC; Senior Advisor, Evercore Jo Swinson MP, Minister for Women and Equalities 1 Executive Women in the Workplace Inquiry Written Evidence: Submission 1 ............................................................151 Dr Heather McGregor, MD, Taylor Bennett Written Evidence: Submission 2 ............................................................153 Cynthia Carroll, former CEO, Anglo American Written Evidence: Submission 3 ............................................................157 Jackie Hunt, CFO, Standard Life Written Evidence: Submission 4 ............................................................161 Heather Jackson, CEO, An Inspirational Journey Written Evidence: Submission 5 ............................................................164 Helen Owers, former Executive, Thomson Reuters Written Evidence: Submission 6 ............................................................166 Dominique Hainebach, MD, Renew Partners 2 Corrected Oral Evidence- Session 1 Corrected Oral Evidence- Session 1 Monday 21st January 2013 Members Present: Mary Macleod MP (Chair) Dr Thérèse Coffey MP Caroline Dinenage MP Andrea Leadsom MP Witnesses: Nigel Whitehead, Group MD Programmes & Support, BAE Systems PLC Marjorie Strachan, Group Talent, Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC Anna Fullerton-Batten, Talent Acquisition Lead, UK Staffing Team, Microsoft Evidence: Nigel Whitehead, Group MD Programmes & Support, BAE Systems PLC Marjorie Strachan, Group Talent, Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC Anna Fullerton-Batten, Talent Acquisition Lead, UK Staffing Team, Microsoft Thérèse Coffey: Can I just say thank you very much for agreeing to come along, it is very kind of you to do so. We are all parliamentarians. Shall we all just introduce ourselves? Caroline Dinenage: Hello I’m Caroline, MP for Gosport. Thérèse Coffey: I’m Thérèse Coffey. My background is that I worked for twelve years for Mars, one of the largest privately owned businesses, and half the board is women. That is just a family, an unusual situation, I appreciate that, but it does not include the executive management team, that is where there are fewer women involved. Mary Macleod: I’m Mary Macleod, MP in West London, and I spent twenty years or so in the city in consulting in the financial services, investment banking and retail banking. I’ve spent a lot of time in the past either looking at getting more women into parliament, or as a business, looking at diversity generally in trying to get more women up through the pipeline, but in parliament also getting more women into parliament. Actually also – and I am so excited about tomorrow, because we have got the succession bill coming before us tomorrow. I wrote in 1999 that I felt females should have the right to succeed to the throne, so I am very excited about that. I think in all different respects I am trying to push the female agenda, which to me is all about equality and fairness, and making sure that women can achieve their potential just like men do. Andrea Leadsom: Absolutely. I’m Andrea Leadsom, MP for South Northamptonshire. I had 25 years in finance, including 11 years in Barclays, two years in a hedge fund, and ten years in Invesco Perpetual, a big funds management company. Also 13 years as Chairman and Trustee of 3 Executive Women in the Workplace Inquiry a children’s charity out in Oxfordshire, so both in the voluntary sector and in the banking sector, and again very much dominated in the banking sector by men. Women tended to fall along the wayside, and it has always been a bit of a mystery to me as to why that is. It is not a complete mystery, but I think a lot can and should be done to make it easier for women to go in and out of their careers. Rather than have a fabulous career, have a baby as late as possible, and then effectively be written off for the rest of their working life. Which is what happens, sometimes by choice, but very often just because employers think you if you are over 40, then you are over the hill, and you can’t possibly now aspire to come in at a middle level and achieve great things. I think there are some structural issues, particularly for women who have children. Q1 Thérèse Coffey: In a nutshell then, this is a crowded space in terms of people talking about women on boards and quotas, which we don’t particularly want. We decided to focus on a particular area, which is how do we get more executive women onto boards? For us, that is often the pipeline of talent. Can I kick off with asking, could you outline how your company goes about its appointment process to executive positions of a senior nature? Do you have particular measures as part of that to try and get gender diversity in it? Do you want to kick off, Nigel? Nigel Whitehead: Okay. It is an issue which we take very seriously and I am pleased to be able to talk about it. It starts at the very top, our managerial executives who are absolutely committed to the issue. As recently as the middle of last year, the chairman was able to explain to our AGM that we had achieved our 25% aspirational target for our board. Indeed our executive committee achieved the same, 25% average as well, which is a very strong signal not just externally, but also within the company, and we also report on the initiatives in line with the changed Corporate Governance Code as of October last year. Having said that, we respect the fact that as a business we are tapping into the defence and aerospace market as it exists in the US. As a global entity we have access to a global market, and from that perspective we have two North American women on our board and executive committee. If you look at the UK part, and I am responsible for UK businesses, we have to ask the question, “is that sustainable?” The immediate answer to that is no. In fact if I mention the nature of our challenge, this problem, for decades engineering businesses have not attracted a proportionate number of women into their businesses. Today our starting point is only 14% of women in our business. It employs over 38,000 people in the UK, only 14% are women. If you look at the number of women coming out of engineering programmes, engineering degrees in the UK, it is about 12%. Notionally we match the pipeline, in terms of the foundation of our company. We think for the 12% we have to look at the further education system. But what are we doing about it? If we look at the 14% we have in the company it is unacceptably low, and we are driven by the simple concept that we actually need better positions in our commerce teams. We have intuitive experience that tells us that. We also have some of the available research and data that underpins that. So we fundamentally believe in sustainability. Just to further define the problem, although the headline is 25% at the top, the reality is that we have a disproportionate drop-off of women representation as we get towards the higher levels, so we have as it were a hole in the management pipeline. A simple question, “how do we recruit to the board?” is more of a challenge than it appears from a distance, so what are we doing about it? Since 2005, we have been running a school roadshow where we have been trying to inspire the next generation. We have actors – it is a theatrical performance – the centre figure of whom is a woman, a young woman who is better at science and engineering than the guys around her. So it is fun, it is dramatic, and measure the impact. We inspire over 25,000 schoolchildren in the UK each year. 85% of those who see the theatrical performance say, “this is great, I would like to do engineering as a result.” The big issue is actually the perception of girls who see the show. Why do we target the age group of 9 to 13 year olds? Because science and maths are difficult when 4 Corrected Oral Evidence- Session 1 you are doing GCSEs, and some people are just scared at that stage, and see no reason to do it. We target that. We target our apprenticeships, we target undergraduates in the same way. We also invest throughout the careers of our target population.
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 523 17 February 2011 No. 121 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 17 February 2011 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 1113 17 FEBRUARY 2011 1114 Mr Hayes: I do indeed congratulate them, and I House of Commons congratulate my hon. Friend on drawing the matter to the House’s attention. I did a little research: the Thursday 17 February 2011 event was attended by 51 employers and resulted in 29 apprenticeship pledges just on the day. My goodness, we are reminded of Virgil: “They can because they The House met at half-past Ten o’clock think they can.” PRAYERS Mary Macleod: I recently visited Brentford football club community sports trust as part of apprenticeship [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] week and have also written to more than 600 businesses to encourage them to take up apprenticeship places and take on more apprentices. What other advice would my hon. Friend give businesses to encourage them to provide Oral Answers to Questions more apprenticeships? Mr Hayes: Businesses need to know that they will BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND SKILLS recoup their investment rapidly, with even the most expensive apprenticeships paying back in less than three years. Apprenticeships have a real link to productivity The Secretary of State was asked— and to competitiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Political Party Change: Why More Conservative Female and Ethnic Minority Candidates Were Successful in the 2010 British General Election
    Understanding Political Party Change: Why More Conservative Female and Ethnic Minority Candidates Were Successful in the 2010 British General Election Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Graduate Program in Global Studies Jytte Klausen, Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Master’s Degree by Adrienne Roach May 2013 Acknowledgements For Matthew Wisnefske who never stops listening; Steve and Beth Roach for their encouragement; and Professor Jytte Klausen for her guidance and support I am also extremely grateful to the Members of Parliament and the former candidate I interviewed for this thesis. I know they all have very busy schedules, and are being asked to do interviews all the time. My time in London was very enlightening, helpful, and enjoyable because these individuals made time for me. I cannot thank them enough. ii Understanding Political Party Change: Why More Conservative Female and Ethnic Minority Candidates Were Successful in the 2010 British General Election A thesis presented to the Graduate Program in Global Studies Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Adrienne Roach This thesis examines the impacts of party competition and societal change and modernization on the outcome of the 2010 British General Election. Through the lens of descriptive representation, this thesis focuses on the 2010 general election as a case study. Interviews are conducted with Conservative female and ethnic minority MPs, and a former candidate to determine why the number of Conservative female and ethnic minority MPs increased in 2010. Three reasons for the increase are examined; competition with the Labour Party, internal pressure from party elites, and David Cameron’s leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2015 Election Results
    GENERAL ELECTION 2015 ● ELECTION RESULTS CONSTITUENCY INCUMBENT PARTY WINNING CANDIDATE PARTY MAJORITY GAIN/HOLD Aberavon Hywel Francis Lab Stephen Kinnock Lab 10,445 HOLD Aberconwy Guto Bebb Con Guto Bebb Con 3,999 HOLD Aberdeen North Frank Doran Lab Kirsty Blackman SNP 13,396 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Aberdeen South Anne Begg Lab Callum McCaig SNP 7,230 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Airdrie and Shotts Pamela Nash Lab Neil Gray SNP 8,779 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Aldershot Gerald Howarth Con Gerald Howarth Con 14,901 HOLD Aldridge-Brownhills Richard Shepherd Con Wendy Morton Con 11,723 HOLD Altrincham and Sale West Graham Brady Con Graham Brady Con 13,290 HOLD Alyn and Deeside Mark Tami Lab Mark Tami Lab 3,343 HOLD Amber Valley Nigel Mills Con Nigel Mills Con 4,205 HOLD Angus Michael Weir SNP Michael Weir SNP 11,230 HOLD Arfon Hywel Williams PC Hywel Williams PC 3,668 HOLD Argyll and Bute Alan Reid Lib Dem Brendan O'Hara SNP 8,473 SNP GAIN FROM LIB DEM Arundel and South Downs Nick Herbert Con Nick Herbert Con 26,177 HOLD prepared by connect intelligence 1 ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● GENERAL ELECTION 2015 ● ELECTION RESULTS Ashfield Gloria De Piero Lab Gloria De Piero Lab 8,820 HOLD Ashford Damian Green Con Damian Green Con 19,296 HOLD Ashton-under-Lyne David Heyes Lab Angela Rayner Lab 10,756 HOLD Aylesbury David Lidington Con David Lidington Con 17,158 HOLD Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock Sandra Osborne Lab Corri Wilson SNP 11,265 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Banbury Tony Baldry Con Victoria Prentis Con 18,395 HOLD Banff and Buchan Eilidh Whiteford SNP Eilidh Whiteford SNP
    [Show full text]
  • Helen Grant Mp
    HELEN GRANT MP House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Dr Mark Carney Governor, Bank of England Threadneedle Street London EC2R 8AH 5 February 2019 Dear Dr Carney, Re: #BanknotesOfColour campaign I am writing to ask that as the Governor of the Bank of England you urgently review and take action on the lack of representation of ethnic minorities on British banknotes. This has been highlighted by the #BanknotesOfColour campaign which aims to secure the first ever ethnic minority on a British banknote. The joint campaign was the result of the merging of two campaigns initiated by social activists Zehra Zaidi and Dr Patrick Vernon OBE for ethnic minority representation on the new £50 polymer note. Ethnic minority communities represent 14% of the UK population according to the 2011 UK Census and this figure will continue to grow – by some estimates this figure could double by 2050. We talk so much of cohesion and integration and of active and engaged citizenship. I believe passionately that all our communities should feel as if they have had, and will have, a stake in Britain’s past, present and future. One part of this effort is to ensure we show how different communities have helped build Britain and reflect that history. The #BanknotesOfColour campaign argues that the Bank has a duty to ensure that wider diversity is represented on our currency. As you will know, there have only been four women in history on banknotes (including The Queen) and no ethnic minorities. Indeed, one of these four women, Jane Austen, was only secured for the £10 note after the online campaign in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to UK Policy Shapers and Influencers 2014 UK Government Departments Handbook
    Guide to UK Policy Shapers and Influencers 2014 UK Government Departments Handbook Oliver O'Hanlon 2014 0 Contents Page Department Page Number Overview of Departmental Policy Programmes 2-3 Cabinet Office 4-5 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 6-8 Department for Communities and Local Government 9 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 10 Department for Education 11-12 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 13 Department for International Development 14 Department for Transport 15 Department for Work and Pensions 16 Department of Energy and Climate Change 17 Department of Health 18-19 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20-21 Her Majesty’s Treasury 22-23 Home Office 24-25 Ministry of Defence 26-27 Ministry of Justice 28 Northern Ireland Office and Northern Ireland Assembly 29-30 Scotland Office and Scottish Government 31-32 Wales Office and Welsh Government 33-34 Current Bills and Legislation going through Parliament 35 Leader of the Opposition Staff and Support team 36 Other relevant agencies and public bodies 37-40 Parliamentary Select Committees 41-42 Associate and All Party Parliamentary Groups 43 Departmental and Devolved Administration Chief Scientific Advisors 44 1 Overview of Departmental Policy Programmes The below is a summary and link to the major policy areas and programmes across all Government Departments. Cabinet Office Social Mobility, Government efficiency, transparency and accountability Department for Business, Innovation and Skills Business and Enterprise, Further Education and Skills, Higher Education,
    [Show full text]
  • How to Run a Country a Parliament of Lawmakers
    How to run a country A Parliament of lawmakers Camilla Hagelund Jonathan Goddard March 2015 How to run a country A Parliament of lawmakers Camilla Hagelund Jonathan Goddard March 2015 Reform Reform is an independent, non-party think tank whose mission is to set out a better way to deliver public services and economic prosperity. Reform is a registered charity, the Reform Research Trust, charity no. 1103739. This publication is the property of the Reform Research Trust. We believe that by reforming the public sector, increasing investment and extending choice, high quality services can be made available for everyone. Our vision is of a Britain with 21st Century healthcare, high standards in schools, a modern and efficient transport system, safe streets, and a free, dynamic and competitive economy. 1 Contents Forewords 3 Graham Brady MP 3 Tom Brake MP 4 Paul Flynn MP 5 Executive summary 6 Introduction 9 1 The case for reform 11 1.1 A deficit of expertise 13 1.2 Excessively partisan 13 1.3 Limited progress 15 1.4 Delegated legislation and the great escape from scrutiny 17 2 Reform of the committee system 19 2.1 Legislative scrutiny entrusted to permanent, specialised select committees 20 2.2 Splitting and extending the committee stage 22 2.3 Provide for better scrutiny of delegated legislation 24 2.4 Enabling use of subcommittees 25 2.5 Accommodating variation in workload 26 2.6 Select committee size 29 2.7 Remuneration and professionalisation 34 2.8 Size of Parliament 38 2.9 Staffing 40 2.10 The payroll vote 40 3 Implications for the constituency role of MPs 43 Appendix A – Committee stage scrutiny 47 Appendix B – Select committee workload case studies 50 Appendix C – Turnover of departmental select committee members 56 Bibliography 66 2 A Parliament of lawmakers / Forewords Forewords Graham Brady MP Only a third of the public think Parliament effective in holding government to account: two thirds want improvement of our democratic institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 565 26 June 2013 No. 24 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 26 June 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 283 26 JUNE 2013 284 David Mundell: We have looked at the regulations, House of Commons which were brought in by the previous Government. We very much respect the work of the Scottish Affairs Wednesday 26 June 2013 Committee and if it finds that the current legislation is not working, we will of course look at the matter. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Referendum Campaign PRAYERS 2. Mark Menzies (Fylde) (Con): What steps the Government have taken to fulfil their pledge to [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] campaign to keep Scotland as part of the UK. [160885] The Secretary of State for Scotland (Michael Moore): Oral Answers to Questions The United Kingdom Government are providing evidence and analysis to allow voters to make an informed choice about Scotland within the United Kingdom. We are SCOTLAND publishing analysis papers on all the key issues throughout this year and next. The Secretary of State was asked— Mark Menzies: Does the Secretary of State agree that Blacklisting the Scotland analysis programme is already highlighting the clear benefits of Scotland being part of the UK, and 1. Jim McGovern (Dundee West) (Lab): What recent of the UK having Scotland within it? discussions he has had with Ministers in the Scottish Government on blacklisting in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 593 5 March 2015 No. 119 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 5 March 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1057 5 MARCH 2015 1058 is that all the options that are being discussed by the House of Commons commission are very different from the proposals considered by the previous Government. Thursday 5 March 2015 Mrs Cheryl Gillan (Chesham and Amersham) (Con): The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Has the Secretary of State asked the Airports Commission to examine the cumulative impact of any runway extension at Heathrow and how it would affect the local area if it PRAYERS coincided with other projects, such as the construction of HS2, the Amersham waste transfer station and the [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] development of Newland park? What assessment has been made of the impact on the local area? BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS Mr McLoughlin: The commission is doing a TRANSPORT FOR LONDON BILL [LORDS] comprehensive piece of work looking at all the options Consideration of Bill, as amended, opposed and deferred relating to aviation capacity in the south-east and the until Monday 16 March at Seven o’clock (Standing associated infrastructure projects that any project it Order No. 20). suggests will affect, so I am sure it will have considered the points made by my right hon. Friend. Sir John Randall (Uxbridge and South Ruislip) (Con): Oral Answers to Questions Notwithstanding whichever decision the Davies commission comes to, does my right hon.
    [Show full text]