DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of Blood Libel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of Blood Libel Transcript for: The Power of a Lie: The History of Blood Libel Hatreds are rooted in stereotypes and myths. The lies persist despite heroic efforts to set the record straight. We are going to examine one of the most powerful and pernicious of those lies, the Blood Libel. It is false claim that Jews engage in ritual murder—that is, religiously sanctioned murder. It has been traced England in the 12 th century. 1. Church Photo and/or 2. Blinded Synagogue The 1100s were a time when many Christians were outraged that Jews refused to convert to Christianity. They saw the Jews’ refusal as a willful and obstinate denial of what they perceived as “God’s truth.” They expressed their anger in words and images that dehumanized and demonized Jews. It was in this charged atmosphere that some Christians began to accuse Jews of ritual murder. The accusation came at a time when life was precarious in Europe. And, as in other times of great fear and anxiety, many people found it all too easy to blame “them”—the people who are not like “us”—for every tragedy, every hardship, every loss. 3. Blood Libels Map 1144-1500, base map appears German Empire, France and England and then zooms into England and Norwich with first appearance of blood libel in 1144 (about 12 seconds total). The blood libel grew out of an incident that took place in Norwich, England, in 1144. On Good Friday, a woodsman discovered the body of a missing child in a forest near his home. The man claimed that young William’s death had to be the work of Jews, because no Christian would have murdered a child so brutally. The boy’s distraught family agreed. The authorities did not. They firmly stated that there was no proof that any Jew was involved. No one was punished for the child’s death. 4. William of Norwich Five years later, a monk named Thomas of Monmouth arrived in Norwich. After hearing the gossip, he decided that the boy’s death was no ordinary murder; it was a ritual murder . He claimed that “the Jews” were re-enacting the crucifixion. He charged that every year they killed an innocent child in much the way “they” killed Christ. He insisted that in 1144 the country they chose was England and the city Norwich. The chosen child was William of Norwich. 5. Map of Blood Libels, 1144-1500 Within just 50-years time, Christians in 8 European cities had accused Jews of ritual murder. In 1255, a new element was added to those charges in the German town of Fulda. It was the strange notion that “the Jews” murder innocent children “for their blood.” By the end of the 13 th century, the number of known accusations had more than tripled and spread to almost every part of Europe, despite the many rulers and popes who insisted that this charge was false. They insisted that Judaism does not permit ritual murder. 6. Blood Libel Drawing Over the centuries the blood libel became rooted in Christian culture in part because it tapped into the fears and anxieties of parents and children alike. It also had particular appeal to the greedy and the corrupt. As Pope Gregory X noted in 1271, some Christians purposely hid their children so that they could use the blood libel to extort money from Jews. 7. Blood Libel in Nazi Propaganda In the 12 th and 13 th centuries, the blood libel was rooted in religious beliefs. When those beliefs changed, the lie persisted. By the 1800s, it was often linked to notions of “race.” Accusations that Jews engage in ritual murder were now considered “proof” of the depravity of the so-called “Jewish race.” In the 1930s and 1940s, Adolf Hitler and his followers used the blood libel as propaganda. Copyright © 2012 by Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. 8. Map of Poland, Kielce indicated and/or 9. Photo of 7 Planty, site of the Kielce pogrom To the surprise of many people, the blood libel continued to incite violence long after the Holocaust ended. On July 4, 1946, a 9-year-old boy in Poland falsely claimed that “the Jews” had dumped him into a sack and then carried him to a basement where he witnessed the murder of 15 Christian children “for their blood.” Within hours of his supposed escape from “the Jews,” 5,000 angry Polish protestors surrounded a building owned by the Jewish community and attacked the Jews inside—nearly all of whom were survivors of Auschwitz and other death camps. When the rampage ended, about 75 Jews were injured and 41 were dead, including a number of infants. Police officers and soldiers rushed to the scene but did not even try to stop the violence. 10 and 11. Close up of Faces Carrying Coffin and Powerful Image of Survivors of Kielce And nearly 700 years after Innocent IV had become the first of pope to confirm that Jews do not practice ritual murder, Poland’s cardinal and all but one of his bishops insisted that the matter had not yet been settled. By the end of 1946, a virulent antisemitism had driven thousands of Jews from Poland, and many others were eager to join them. The blood libel reveals much about the way a lie becomes imbedded in a society. It also reveals why antisemitism persists—it is a very convenient hatred. Copyright © 2012 by Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tokarska-Bakir the Kraków Pogrom the Kraków Pogrom of 11 August
    Tokarska-Bakir_The Kraków pogrom The Kraków Pogrom of 11 August 1945 against the Comparative Background 1. The aim of the conducted research/the research hypothesis The subject of the project is the analysis of the Kraków pogrom of August 1945 against the background of the preceding similar events in Poland (Rzeszów, June 1945) and abroad (Lviv, June 1945), as well as the Slovak and Hungarian pogroms at different times and places. The undertaking is a continuation of the research described in my book "Pod klątwą. Społeczny portret pogromu kieleckiego" (2018), in which I worked out a methodology of microhistorical analysis, allowing the composition of a pogrom crowd to be determined in a maximally objective manner. Thanks to the extensive biographical query it was possible to specify the composition of the forces of law and order of the Citizens' Militia (MO), the Internal Security Corps (KBW), and the Polish Army that were sent to suppress the Kielce pogrom, as well as to put forward hypotheses associated with the genesis of the event. The question which I will address in the presented project concerns the similarities and differences that exist between the pattern according to which the Kielce and Kraków pogroms developed. To what extent did the people who were within the structures of the forces of law and order, primarily communist militia, take part in it –those who murdered Jews during the war? Are the acts of anti-Semitic violence on the Polish, Ukrainian, and Slovak lands structurally similar or fundamentally different? What are the roles of the legend of blood (blood libel), the stereotype of Żydokomuna (Jewish communists), and demographical panic and panic connected with equal rights for Jews, which destabilised traditional social relations? In the framework of preparatory work I managed to initiate the studies on the Kraków pogrom in the IPN Archive (Institute of National Remembrance) and significantly advance the studies concerning the Ukrainian, Hungarian, and Slovak pogroms (the query was financed from the funds from the Marie Curie grant).
    [Show full text]
  • The Libro Verde: Blood Fictions from Early Modern Spain
    INFORMATION TO USERS The negative microfilm of this dissertation was prepared and inspected by the school granting the degree. We are using this film without further inspection or change. If there are any questions about the content, please write directly to the school. The quality of this reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original material The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Dissertation Information Service A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 9731534 Copyright 1997 by Beusterien, John L. All rights reserved. UMI Microform 9731534 Copyright 1997, by UMI Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Titic 17, United States Code. UMI 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103 Reproduced with permission
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Conference Program
    COVER: Stone medallion with the purported martyrdom scene of Simonino di Trento. Palazzo Salvadori, Trent, Italy. Photo by Andreas Caranti. Via Wikimedia Commons. YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH PRESENTS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 9, 2016 CO-SPONSORED BY 1 INCE ITS FABRICATION IN THE MIDDLE AGES, the accusation that Jews Skidnapped, tortured and killed Christian children in mockery of Christ and the Crucifixion, or for the use of their blood, has been the basis for some of the most hateful examples of organized antisemitism. The blood libel has inspired expulsions and murder of Jews, tortures and forced mass conversions, and has served as an ines- capable focal point for wider strains of anti-Jewish sentiment that permeate learned and popular discourse, social and political thought, and cultural media. In light of contemporary manifestations of antisemitism around the world it is appropriate to re-examine the enduring history, the wide dissemination, and the persistent life of a historical and cultural myth—a bald lie—intended to demonize the Jewish people. This conference explores the impact of the blood libel over the centuries in a wide variety of geographic regions. It focuses on cultural memory: how cultural memory was created, elaborated, and transmitted even when based on no actual event. Scholars have treated the blood libel within their own areas of expertise—as medieval myth, early modern financial incentive, racial construct, modern catalyst for pogroms and the expulsion of Jews, and political scare tactic—but rarely have there been opportunities to discuss such subjects across chronological and disciplinary borders. We will look at the blood libel as historical phenomenon, legal justification, economic mechanism, and visual and literary trope with ongoing political repercussions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mythologizing the Jewish Other in the “Prioress's Tale”
    MYTHOLOGIZING THE JEWISH OTHER IN THE “Prioress’s Tale” Barbara Stevenson For a religious system like Christianity to prosper, it must convince members that it is the divinely-sanctioned charter upon which the com- munity is based, and it must adapt to cultural changes over time. These demands create a paradoxical situation: a theology must appear to be a timeless, fixed truth while at the same time reinventing itself as histori- cal events reshape a community. To succeed, such a system needs “plas- ticity,” Raymond Firth’s term for the chameleon-like quality of myth to appear timeless while altering its form to fit new situations.1 As a mytho- logical system, Christianity has its sacred origin in the Gospels’ narratives of Jesus’s crucifixion at the hands of his Roman and Jewish enemies and his subsequent resurrection. For the Christianity of late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, the written legends of saints provided one means of revis- ing the original sacred charter. Surrogates for Jesus, saints re-enacted this mythic origin with their martyrdom and miracles recorded in hagiography and provided variations that depart from the original myth by adapting to changing situations. Ritualistic celebrations of recorded saints’ lives allowed Christians to form a community and an identity separate from the Other who tried to vanquish their Christ and saints.2 In one medieval hagiographical tradition, Christian children—evoking the Christ Child who as an adult would be crucified—became martyrs at the hands of Jews, seen as the medieval descendants of those who participated in the deicide of Jesus Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circumcision Case of Odard and the Legacy of St William of Norwich
    6 The Missing Accusation: The Circumcision Case of Odard and the Legacy of St William of Norwich Julia Tomlinson Introduction The ritual murder accusation has a long and clear history of anti-Judaic sentiment. This accusation was first made in England regarding the death of St William of Norwich in 1144. Yet it is unclear whether the lay community of Norwich actually experienced this cult in an anti- Judaic way: did they in fact associate St William with ritual murder and antagonistic feelings towards their Jewish neighbors? Evidence for his cult in the first 150 years is lacking. I believe, however, that by looking at available information on the cult alongside Jewish-Christian relations in the town, we can see that Christians in the lay community did not associate the cult with ritual murder, nor was it likely associated with strong anti-Judaic sentiment. This is especially clear when one examines the case of Odard, a Christian boy in Norwich who in 1230 was circumcised by Jews. Despite the physical, religiously-motivated nature of the crime, there were no accusations of ritual murder within Norwich. This missing accusation shows that the possibility of ritual murder—and the memory of St William—did not weigh heavily on the laity’s mind. If they felt the real presence of St William’s cult and the anti-Judaic sentiment associated with it, the Christian lay community of Norwich would associate ritual murder with Odard’s case. Ritual Murder Accusations: Truth or Fiction? In discussing the anti-Judaic nature of ritual murder accusations, we must first establish if there is any truth to such accusations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Hugh of Lincoln — from History to Nursery Rhyme
    KARL HEINZ GÖLLER Sir Hugh of Lincoln — From History to Nursery Rhyme / Historical Background 1.1 The Myth of the Jewish Ritual Murder All ascertainable historical facts concerning the alleged murder of Hugh of Lincoln are connected, in one way or another, with the myth of the Jewish ritual murder, which was widespread in England during the Middle Ages. It had been given new momentum through the murder of a young boy named William of Norwich in the year 1144.1 In this connection the Jewish apostate 1 The child martyr Hugh of Lincoln is often confused with the famous Bishop Hugh of Lincoln. On his vita, see Life of Hugh of Lincoln, ed. James Francis Dimock, R. S. (London, 1864); on the murder of William of Norwich, see M. D. Anderson, A Saint at Stake: The Strange Death of William of Norwich, 1144 (London, 1964), which also contains much back• ground information pertinent to the Hugh of Lincoln story; on Copin and John of Lexington, see 106—108. On the alleged "Jewish blood ritual", cf. Hermann L. Strack, Das Blut im Glau• ben und Aberglauben der Menschheit: Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der "Volksmedizin" und des "jüdi• schen Blutritus" (München, 8th ed. 1900), esp. Chap. 18: "Das angebliche Zeugnis der Geschichte für jüdische Ritualmorde", 121 ff. On the modern view of the facts behind the story, see "Hugh of Lincoln", DNB, XXVIII, 169—171. The traditional medieval view is still predominant in Thomas Fuller, The History of the Worthies of England, 3 vols. (London, 1840; rpt. New York, 1965); here II, 271.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Description Fall 2013
    COURSE DESCRIPTION FALL 2013 TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL STUDY ABROAD ‐ FALL SEMESTER 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTION MAIN OFFICE UNITED STATES CANADA The Carter Building , Room 108 Office of Academic Affairs Lawrence Plaza Ramat Aviv, 6997801, Israel 39 Broadway, Suite 1510 3130 Bathurst Street, Suite 214 Phone: +972‐3‐6408118 New York, NY 10006 Toronto, Ontario M6A 2A1 Fax: +972‐3‐6409582 Phone: +1‐212‐742‐9030 [email protected] [email protected] Fax: +1‐212‐742‐9031 [email protected] INTERNATIONAL.TAU.AC.IL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ■ FALL SEMESTER 2013 DATES 3‐4 ■ ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS 6‐17 O INSTRUCTIONS FOR REGISTRATION 6‐7 O REGULAR UNIVERSITY COURSES 7 O WITHDRAWAL FROM COURSES 8 O PASS/FAIL OPTION 8 O INCOMPLETE COURSES 8 O GRADING SYSTEM 9 O CODE OF HONOR AND ACADEMIC INTEGRITY 9 O RIGHT TO APPEAL 10 O SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS 10 O HEBREW ULPAN REGULATIONS 11 O TAU WRITING CENTER 11‐12 O DESCRIPTION OF LIBRARIES 13 O MOODLE 13 O SCHEDULE OF COURSES 14‐16 O EXAM TIMETABLE 17 ■ TRANSCRIPT REQUEST INSTRUCTIONS 18 ■ COURSE DESCRIPTIONS 19‐97 ■ REGISTRATION FORM FOR STUDY ABROAD COURSES 98 ■ EXTERNAL REGISTRATION FORM 99 2 FALL SEMESTER 2013 IMPORTANT DATES ■ The Fall Semester starts on Sunday, October 6th 2013 and ends on Thursday, December 19th 2013. ■ Course registration deadline: Thursday, September 8th 2013. ■ Class changes and finalizing schedule (see hereunder): October 13th – 14th 2013. ■ Last day in the dorms: Sunday, December 22nd 2013. Students are advised to register to more than the required 5 courses but not more than 7 courses.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, and the Trial of Mendel Beilis
    Swarthmore College Works History Faculty Works History 2015 Connecting The Dots: Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, And The Trial Of Mendel Beilis Robert Weinberg Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history Part of the History Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Robert Weinberg. (2015). "Connecting The Dots: Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, And The Trial Of Mendel Beilis". Word And Image In Russian History: Essays In Honor Of Gary Marker. 238-252. https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history/464 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Connecting the Dots: Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, and the Trial of Mendel Beilis Robert Weinberg (Swarthmore College) he prosecution of Mendel Beilis for the murder of thirteen-year-old TAndrei Iushchinskii in Kiev a century ago is perhaps the most publi- cized instance of blood libel since the torture and execution of Jews accused of ritually murdering the infant Simon of Trent in 1475. By the time of the trial in the fall of 1913, the Beilis case had become an inter- national cause célèbre. Like the trials of Alfred Dreyfus in the 1890s and the outcry that accompanied the Damascus Affair in the 1840s, the arrest, incarceration, and trial of Beilis aroused public criticism of Russia’s treatment of Jews and inspired opponents of the autocracy at home and abroad to launch a campaign to condemn the trial.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Antisemitism Fall 2019
    A History of Antisemitism Fall 2019 Dr. Katherine Aron-Beller Tel Aviv University International [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________ An analysis of articulated hatred toward Jews as a historical force. After treating precursors in the pagan world of antiquity and in classical Christian doctrine, the course will focus on the modern phenomenon crystallizing in 19th-century Europe and reaching its lethal extreme in Nazi ideology, propaganda, and policy. Expressions in the U.S. and in the Arab world, as well as Jewish reactions to antisemitism, will also be studied. Course Outline 1. Wednesday 23td October: Antisemitism – the oldest hatred Gavin Langmuir, Toward a Definition of Antisemitism. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990)pp. 311-352. Peter Schäfer, Judaeophobia: Attitudes Toward the Jews in the Ancient World. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1997, pp. 34-64, 197-211. 2. Monday 28th October: Jews as Christ Killers – the deepest accusation New Testament (any translation): Matthew 23; 26:57-27:54; John 5:37-40, 8:37-47 John Chrysostom, Discourses Against Judaizing Christians, Homily 1 at: www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/chrysostom-jews6.html Marcel Simon, Verus Israel. Oxford: Littman Library, 1986, pp. 179-233. 3. Wednesday 30th October: The Crusades: The First Massacre of the Jews Soloman bar Samson: The Crusaders in Mainz, May 27, 1096 at: www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/1096jews-mainz.html Robert Chazan, “Anti-Jewish violence of 1096 – Perpetrators and dynamics” in Anna Sapir Abulafia Religious Violence between Christians and Jews (Palgrave, 2002) Daniel Lasker, “The Impact of the Crusades on the Jewish-Christian debate” Jewish History 13, 2 (1999) 23-26 4.
    [Show full text]
  • S. Robert of Bury St Edmunds H. Hill
    98 S. ROBERT OF BURY ST. EDMUNDS. S. ROBERT OF BURY ST. EDMUNDS. REV. H. COPINGERHILL. In sanctity of life non proven for saintship, yet in death distinctly martyrs are three traditional names which belong to the Eastern Counties but of whom legend says but little, except as to the methdd of their deaths : they belong to a long list of children crucified in derision by the Jews throughout Europe, viz. : S. William of Norwich (1137 or 1144), S. Robert of Bury St. Edmunds (1179 or 1181) and S. Hugh of Lincoln (1255). (A boy was martyred at Winchester . in 1192). William, whose age is given as 12 or 13 is said to have been crowned with thorns in Passion Week and crucified on the Good Friday, to have been found in Thorpe Wood and buried there on the scene of the murder ; shortly afterwards, about March 28 (Easter Tuesday) a priest, Godwin Sturt by name, exhumed the body in company with his son Alexander and a nephew Robert, all three identifying the body as that of William, son of Wenstun, a priest, and his wife, Livia, whose sister was wife to G. Sturt. Another account states that the body was not found till five years later, hanging on a tree. By order of Bishop Everard, he was buried in the Monk's Cemetery-; then after a succession of miracles, etc., &posited in a shrine in the Cathedral. On a screen at Loddon in Norfolk he is represented as bound saltirewise to stakes and Jews are wounding his side and receiving the blood in a basin.
    [Show full text]
  • {Dоwnlоаd/Rеаd PDF Bооk} the Murder of William of Norwich: the Origins of Blood Libel in Medieval Europe
    THE MURDER OF WILLIAM OF NORWICH: THE ORIGINS OF BLOOD LIBEL IN MEDIEVAL EUROPE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK E. M. Rose | 416 pages | 27 Aug 2015 | Oxford University Press | 9780190219628 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom The Murder of William of Norwich: The Origins of Blood Libel in Medieval Europe PDF Book Religious doctrine and sentiment did not cause the blood libel to propagate. Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Chapter 7 Bury St. William's hagiographer, Thomas of Monmouth , falsely claimed that every year there is an international council of Jews at which they choose the country in which a child will be killed during Easter, because of a Jewish prophecy that states that the killing of a Christian child each year will ensure that the Jews will be restored to the Holy Land. Recently viewed 0 Save Search. Anti-Semitic allegations of ritual murder must be seen from the point of view of the history of the locality, but also in a wide perspective that includes political, economic and religious developments, never isolated from the context of historical event. Rose Fascinating micro-history of a mysterious 12th-century murder and the ensuing court case--a medieval "True Crimes" meets Philip Marlowe The first book to offer a generally accepted explanation for the origin of the ritual murder accusation that is grounded in immediate historical circumstances Accessible to general readers and intellectually satisfying to those interested in medieval history and religion. Rating details. But actually, he accuses the entire Jewish people. Her exhaustive analysis of Thomas of Monmouth's The Life and Passion of William of Norwich as the source of the ritual murder accusation a legend that has caused much Jewish suffering deserves to have a wide audience of general and Jewish history readers alike.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blood Libel in Eastern Europe
    Jewish History (2012) 26: 275–285 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 DOI: 10.1007/s10835-012-9166-2 The Blood Libel in Eastern Europe ROBERT WEINBERG Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA E-mail: [email protected] Keywords Antisemitism · Blood libel · Kiev · Mendel Beilis · Russian Empire This issue of Jewish History explores the phenomenon of “blood libel” in eastern Europe in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The accusation that Jews murder Christians, particularly young boys and girls, for ritual purposes has a long and lurid lineage that dates back to the Middle Ages.1 The accusa- tion of ritual murder emerged in England in the mid-twelfth century with the charge that Jews had killed a Christian youth in order to mock the Passion of Christ. By the middle of the thirteenth century the belief that Jews killed Christians had spread to the European continent, where gentiles now accused Jews of desecrating the Host and using gentile blood for religious purposes, including consuming it in matzo. The charge of ritual murder gained strength in the wake of the Fourth Lateran Council, held in 1215, when the Western Christian church affirmed that the wafer and wine used in the sacrament of the Eucharist contained the body and blood of Christ. According to some histo- rians, the belief that Christians consumed the blood and flesh of their savior during weekly communion—the doctrine of transubstantiation—prompted many believers to project onto Jews their own guilt over ritual cannibalism.2 Church officials in Rome issued numerous papal bulls that rejected the notion of blood libel, asserting that Jews did not engage in Host desecration or use gentile blood for the baking of matzo.
    [Show full text]