DOCSLIB.ORG

Fall 2010 Journalism 349 T/395: Reporting the World

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fall 2010 Journalism 349 T/395: Reporting the World Fall 2010 Journalism 349 T/395: Reporting the World: A Critical Examination of the U.S. News Media Classes: T/Th 12:30 - 2 Instructor: Tracy Dahlby Telephone: 512-471-6272 Email: [email protected] Teaching Assistant: Monica Chadha Objectives This course is designed to provide students with a dynamic way of looking at, thinking about, and reporting the world, both abroad and at home. It will help you establish a framework for analyzing and understanding the events and processes that shape our lives in a global society. Our guiding considerations: How does the news we consume form our views of the world and influence our reporting? To what extent do such views jibe with or differ from what really occurs? As journalistic observers, how can we develop tools for obtaining a clearer picture of important events and trends? In attempting to answer such questions, we will focus on how to: . Think critically about what purpose the news media serve – and how we can use various news- and non-news media to see the world more clearly. Determine the extent to which the news media succeed or fail in conveying the reality of events on the ground and why. Drill down to fundamental layers of understanding about events, their political, economic, cultural and psychological complexities, and develop deep context on issues affecting our communities and us. Develop and hone our research, reporting and writing techniques. Distinguish the dos and don’ts of professional journalism, and consider the ethical compass points of fairness, accuracy and truth seeking as they relate to explaining the world around us. Prerequisites Undergraduates (J349): Admission to a journalism area of concentration. Graduate students (J395): Graduate standing. Classes The class meets for 1 ½ hours twice a week and employs a series of case studies that will teach you to think critically about how the news is “made” and the factors that have contributed to the shaping of American journalism today; the degree to which ideologies, ownership and political power clarify or obscure journalism’s task of going after the illuminating or significant story and getting it right; the journalist’s obligations to history, objectivity and fairness; the proper stance to assume in regard to conflicting value systems and the demands posed by technological, political and social change in a globalizing world. In short, we will discuss and practice techniques for becoming better reporters and writers. Each class will start with an editorial discussion of what’s in the news and how it relates to our study. Your familiarity with the ebb and flow of current events will be an important factor in your grade for class participation. At the first class session we will discuss how to set up a network of RSS feeds to help you monitor the events of the world. You will be required to follow: The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Financial Times, the Economist, Newsweek, the BBC World News, and Reuters. You are welcome to monitor any additional news outlets you find useful and encouraged to share them with the rest of us. The instructor will lead seminar-style discussions of the ideas, issues and events under our journalistic microscope. You will be encouraged to volunteer your ideas and from time to time will also be called on to participate to ensure that everyone gets involved and we all benefit from a full range of views. Assignments There will be three main types (four for grad students): . Commentary and news analysis: Designed to reflect your thinking on issues covered in class, regular written assignments will develop your ability to process information and opinion (from assigned reading, other media, and class discussion) and make meaning out of it for a general audience. Completing the assigned reading and reporting on your own initiative will be critical to demonstrating your grasp of the issues in written form. Leading class discussion: Each student will be asked to help lead a class discussion based on our readings at least once during the course of the semester. Graduate students (and undergrads for extra credit): One extra essay will be required of grad students – in consultation with the instructor grad students will choose a book (or books) from the Suggested Reading list below and write an analysis of 800 to 1,000 words to be filed before the Thanksgiving holiday break. Please do not choose a book you have already read or written about. Semester project (grads and undergrads): You will choose a topic of your liking that deals with issues or events covered in class and develop an in-depth 2 approach to it. The length of the assignment is a minimum of 2,000 words for undergraduates and 2,500 words for graduate students – or the multimedia equivalent. Students wanting to do a multimedia project should discuss plans with the instructor well in advance of the deadline. Important dates: Project rough drafts are due on Monday, November 22, at 6 p.m.; completed drafts are due on Monday, December 6, at 12 noon. Note: Your instructor reserves the right to require written summaries of reading assignments where necessary for adequate comprehension. Grades Timing: Deadlines are sacrosanct in journalism. Meet them and qualify your assignments for full credit; miss them and your highest potential grade will drop sharply – one grade level at each of the following benchmarks: 30 minutes, 12 hours, 24 hours late. You may always file your assignments before deadline to the applause of your grateful editors. Assessment: Writing assignments will be graded on the skill with which you use language, organization and solidly reported content to illustrate and satisfy your topic – and the degree to which you improve your skills over the course of the semester. See Appendix I below for a detailed assessment grid for commentaries and analysis. The Matrix: Final course grades will be calculated on the plus/minus grading system for both undergraduate and graduate students. They will be tallied according to the following percentage guidelines: . Commentary, analysis and reporting exercises 50 . Semester project 15 . Class participation and in-class exercises 35 Filing Your Work All written communication between you and your editors (instructor and TA) will be electronic. For routine memos (messages), use standard email. Send story proposals and story files as email attachments in Word. When filing an attachment always be sure to put the same slug on BOTH your email AND the attachment. Here’s how to create a proper slug: Start by using the correct tag for the item you’re sending: For commentaries/stories, it’s “file.” For project proposals, it’s “prop.” For all other messages, it’s “memo.” Add a space, then your last name, and then another space, and finally the assignment number (or for memos only, a brief topic identifier). If your last name is Smith, for example, and you’re filing your first assignment, the slug reads: 3 file smith assign1 If you’re filing a project proposal, the slug is: prop smith project If you’re sending a routine memo, it reads: memo smith missed deadline Please send all proposals and story files to both of your editors – one copy to Monica, one to Tracy. Memos can of course be sent to either Monica or Tracy or both, depending on to whom you want to talk about what. Important: Always start all commentaries with a working headline. Putting a headline or title on your work helps focus both writer and reader, and is therefore a good habit to acquire. Thus it’s also a requirement of this course. Editorial Consultations You will meet with your instructor at least once during the semester to discuss individual progress, reporting methods, research ideas and career goals. You are also encouraged to make use of office hours to discuss any of the foregoing. Tips for Success Reading: Reading, both panoramic and sharply focused, is essential to your success as a journalist. Formal reading assignments come from two main sources – required texts or materials provided for you on our Blackboard site. Please do all the reading assigned for class discussion so that we can make the best use of our time together. Taking notes: Producing good notes is second nature to the professional journalist; even in the presence of cameras or other recording devices you want your own record of comments and events to help you decide what you think about things and how they connect to other things you know. Accordingly, each time you encounter a source, whether human or media (e.g., a city official, an expert on climate change, or a book, an article or a video) please take notes. This is important both in the course and for your development as a critical thinker. To talk or write authoritatively about a subject you need to not only read and view but master the relevant materials, which means retaining key ideas and supporting detail. Taking good notes is the best way to ensure you have something lasting to show for your close encounters with the world of sources and ideas. Office hours: Take advantage of them – to discuss the class, your progress, ideas, career plans, or your professional interests. You’re always welcome. 4 Required Texts Orientalism, by Edward W. Said Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of its Enemies, by Ian Buruma and Avishai Margalit The Race Beat: The Press, the Civil Rights Struggle, and the Awakening of a Nation, by Gene Roberts and Hank Klibanoff China: The Balance Sheet: What the World Needs to Know About the Emerging Superpower, by C. Fred Bergsten, et al Suggested Reading Internet Impact Googled: The End of the World as We Know It by Ken Auletta Cyberselfish: A Critical Romp through the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High Tech by Paulina Borsook The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains by Nicholas Carr The Age of American Unreason by Susan Jacoby The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing Our Culture by Andrew Keen You Are Not Gadget: A Manifesto by Jaron Lanier Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge by Cass R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Staring Death in the Face During Times of War: When Ethics, Law, and Self-Censorship in the News Media Hide the Morbidity of Authenticity Clay Calvert
    Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Volume 25 Article 4 Issue 1 Symposium on Censorship & the Media 1-1-2012 Staring Death in the Face during Times of War: When Ethics, Law, and Self-Censorship in the News Media Hide the Morbidity of Authenticity Clay Calvert Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp Recommended Citation Clay Calvert, Staring Death in the Face during Times of War: When Ethics, Law, and Self-Censorship in the News Media Hide the Morbidity of Authenticity, 25 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 87 (2012). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol25/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARING DEATH IN THE FACE DURING TIMES OF WAR: WHEN ETHICS, LAW, AND SELF- CENSORSHIP IN THE NEWS MEDIA HIDE THE MORBIDITY OF AUTHENTICITY CLAY CALVERT* & MIRELIs TORRESt INTRODUCTION Photos are trickier than words, because their content is in large measure emotional, visceral, and because you can't edit their content. That's how Bill Keller, executive editor of The New York Times, succinctly describes the difficulty and dilemma posed in deciding which wartime images newspapers should publish.' A recent, real-life scenario illustrates the problem: during a Taliban ambush in the Helmand province of southern Afghanistan, a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Intimate Perspectives from the Battlefields of Iraq
    'The Best Covered War in History': Intimate Perspectives from the Battlefields of Iraq by Andrew J. McLaughlin A thesis presented to the University Of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Andrew J. McLaughlin 2017 Examining Committee Membership The following served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. External Examiner Marco Rimanelli Professor, St. Leo University Supervisor(s) Andrew Hunt Professor, University of Waterloo Internal Member Jasmin Habib Associate Professor, University of Waterloo Internal Member Roger Sarty Professor, Wilfrid Laurier University Internal-external Member Brian Orend Professor, University of Waterloo ii Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract This study examines combat operations from the 2003 invasion of Iraq War from the “ground up.” It utilizes unique first-person accounts that offer insights into the realities of modern warfare which include effects on soldiers, the local population, and journalists who were tasked with reporting on the action. It affirms the value of media embedding to the historian, as hundreds of journalists witnessed major combat operations firsthand. This line of argument stands in stark contrast to other academic assessments of the embedding program, which have criticized it by claiming media bias and military censorship. Here, an examination of the cultural and social dynamics of an army at war provides agency to soldiers, combat reporters, and innocent civilians caught in the crossfire.
    [Show full text]
  • Media History Monographs 15:1 (2012-2013) ISSN 1940-8862
    Media History Monographs 15:1 (2012-2013) ISSN 1940-8862 When Objectivity Works: David Halberstam’s Vietnam Reporting Ronald Seyb Skidmore College Most Americans accept that Vietnam was America’s first “living room war” as readily as they accept that it was America’s first military defeat. Even many scholars have privileged television’s coverage of the war in their analyses of the press’s role in shaping public perceptions of the conflict. This article seeks to correct this imbalance by assessing David Halberstam’s Vietnam reporting. It argues that while Halberstam’s field reporting in Vietnam is rightly praised for giving readers an up close view of the conflict, it was the reporting that he did away from the field on the Buddhist Crisis that displayed most clearly the virtues of journalistic objectivity as a professional norm that allows reporters to, in the words of Donald McDonald, “discover and communicate the coherence of a complex, unfolding reality.” ©2012 Ronald Seyb Media History Monographs 15:1 Seyb When Objectivity Works: David Halberstam’s Vietnam Reporting Americans’ collective memory of the Viet- perception of the war in ways that would have nam War consists principally of a pastiche of long-term consequences for their profession: televised images: A Marine igniting with a Zippo In this brief but crucial period they would . lighter the thatch roof of a Vietnamese villager’s . establish the standards for a new gen- home, a Buddhist monk immolating himself in eration of war correspondents—and tele- downtown Saigon, a South Vietnamese General vision as well. These were provocative, casually executing a suspected Vietcong death new, adversarial standards that broke from squad leader, and a seemingly endless line of the old and would be used to chronicle grievously wounded soldiers being hustled on America’s disaster in Vietnam and events stretchers to waiting helicopters.1 long after.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrison Salisbury, the Vietnamese Enemy, and Wartime
    From Behind Enemy Lines: Harrison Salisbury, the Vietnamese Enemy, and Wartime Reporting During the Vietnam War A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Annessa C. Stagner June 2008 2 © 2008 Annessa C. Stagner All Rights Reserved 3 This thesis titled From Behind Enemy Lines: Harrison Salisbury, the Vietnamese Enemy, and Wartime Reporting During the Vietnam War by ANNESSA C. STAGNER has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Chester J. Pach, Jr. Associate Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 4 ABSTRACT STAGNER, ANNESSA C., M.A., June 2008, History From Behind Enemy Lines: Harrison Salisbury, the Vietnamese Enemy, and Wartime Reporting During the Vietnam War (165 pp.) Director of Thesis: Chester J. Pach, Jr. On December 24, 1966, Harrison Salisbury became the first mainstream American journalist to report from North Vietnam during the Vietnam War. From his position behind enemy lines, the New York Times reporter revealed that America’s bombing campaign was causing many more civilian casualties than the Johnson administration had acknowledged. Additionally, he challenged how Americans perceived their enemy by portraying North Vietnam’s culture and political ideology as legitimate. Evaluation of governmental and public responses to his stories reveals the significance of these reports. They sparked controversy that undermined American and international confidence in the Johnson administration’s credibility, decreased support for U.S. policies towards North Vietnam, and put increased pressure on the Johnson administration to increase efforts towards peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Liberties in Uncivil Times: the Ep Rilous Quest to Preserve American Freedoms Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2007 Civil Liberties in Uncivil Times: The eP rilous Quest to Preserve American Freedoms Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Civil Liberties in Uncivil Times: The eP rilous Quest to Preserve American Freedoms, 2 London Law Review 2 (2007) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. bepress Legal Series Year Paper Civil Liberties in Uncivil Times: The Perilous Quest to Preserve American Freedoms Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore This working paper is hosted by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress) and may not be commercially reproduced without the permission of the copyright holder. http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1090 Copyright c 2006 by the author. Civil Liberties in Uncivil Times: The Perilous Quest to Preserve American Freedoms Abstract The perilous quest to preserve civil liberties in uncivil times is not an easy one, but the wisdom of Benjamin Franklin should remain a beacon: “Societies that trade liberty for security end often with neither.” Part I of this article is a brief history of civil liberties in America during past conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Printer Emulator for Testing
    ENABLERS OF A WAR: THE AMERICAN PRESS AND VIETNAM, 1954-1960 ____________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Chico ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History ____________ by Kevin Allen Luty Spring 2015 PUBLICATION RIGHTS No portion of this thesis may be reprinted or reproduced in any manner unacceptable to the usual copyright restrictions without the written permission of the author. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Publication Rights ...................................................................................................... iii Abstract ...................................................................................................................... v CHAPTER I. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 II. Collaborators in Colonialism, 1954-1955 ...................................................... 7 III. Encouragers of Optimism, 1955-1956 ........................................................... 31 IV. Purveyors of Pessimism, 1957-1960.............................................................. 49 V. Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 70 Bibliography .............................................................................................................. 75 iv ABSTRACT ENABLERS OF A WAR: THE AMERICAN PRESS AND VIETNAM, 1954-1960 by Kevin Allen Luty Master of Arts in History California
    [Show full text]
  • The Remembered War: the Korean War in American Culture, 1953-1995
    THE REMEMBERED WAR: THE KOREAN WAR IN AMERICAN CULTURE, 1953-1995 by JONATHAN C. MERRITT ANDREW J. HUEBNER, COMMITTEE CHAIR KARI FREDERICKSON EDWARD T. LINENTHAL MARGARET PEACOCK SARAH STEINBOCK-PRATT A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2017 Copyright Jonathan C. Merritt 2017 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT After three years of bitter fighting, the Korean War ended on July 27, 1953. It profoundly shaped and directed American Cold War policy for the next four decades. Korea’s place in American culture and memory, however, has seemingly been less profound. This dissertation reassesses the war’s legacy from the armistice in 1953 through the construction of the Korean War Veterans Memorial in 1995. It argues that representations of the war have shifted over time in response to contemporary social concerns, emphasizing different aspects of the war that resonated with Americans at the time. Simultaneously, the image of Korea as the Forgotten War has also shaped the war’s meaning and such a label, ironically, has had an important impact on how it has been remembered. Finally, the memory of Korea has been unable to escape the long shadows cast by other conflicts of the twentieth century, especially World War II and Vietnam. These wars have simultaneously limited and broadened the Korean War’s legacy. Taking these factors into consideration, this dissertation reassesses the Korean War’s place in American culture by tracing the various ways it has been remembered and represented.
    [Show full text]
  • David Halberstam a Case Study of a Journalist's Role and Vision on The
    MA Thesis North American Studies Justin Kevenaar S1046756 Dr. A. Fairclough Second Reader: Dr. E.F. V.D. Bilt 13 May 2015 David Halberstam A Case Study of a Journalist's Role and Vision on the Vietnam War Table of Contents Introduction 2 Chapter 1 8 Landscape of U.S. journalism and politics prior to the Vietnam War Chapter 2 16 Conservative criticism of David Halberstam and the media bias Chapter 3 27 The Burning Monk and the fall of Diem Chapter 4 35 Halberstam in comparison with his colleagues & pressure from the editors Chapter 5 42 America's reaction to the supposed undermining of war support & Halberstam's explanation of the Vietnam conflict Conclusion 52 Bibliography 57 1 Introduction ‘You know, you never beat us on the battlefield?’ ‘That may be so, but it is also irrelevant’ - Conversation between Colonel Harry Summers and Northern Vietnamese Colonel Tu. The relationship between the American media and the Vietnam War is one that has often been debated between historians. Prior to the Vietnam War the government underwent fundamental changes with regards to their relationship with the press. There was a so called 'new secrecy' in which the government felt that the need to keep the public (and therefore the press) away from information became bigger than ever before. Presidents Truman and Eisenhower introduced measures such as the McMahon Act (meant for development and control of atomic energy) and Executive Order 10-290 (which gave every Federal Agency the right to declare any kind of information 'confidential'). These measures, according to an anonymous journalist "gave just about everybody in Washington, including janitors, the right to withhold information in the sacred name of national security.1 However, despite these measures to decrease the influence of the press, the Vietnam War would prove that these journalists had more power than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • NPC Award Winners
    Programs & Events: NPC Award Winners To view the names and publications of current and past NPC Award winners, scroll down the page. Use the Find function of your browser to jump to a particular name. Fourth Estate Award Winners Year Name Organization 2005 Austin Kiplinger Kiplinger Washington Editors 2004 William Raspberry Washington Post Writers Group 2003 Tom Brokaw NBC News 2002 Brian Lamb C-SPAN 2001 Robert Novak Columnist 2000 Jack Germond The Baltimore Sun 1999 Carl T. Rowan King Features Syndicated Columnist 1998 Mary McGrory The Washington Post 1997 James Perry Wall Street Journal 1996 Charles McDowell Richmond Times-Dispatch 1995 Shirley Povich The Washington Post 1994 Charles Kuralt CBS News 1993 Eugene Roberts The Philadelphia Inquirer 1992 George Tames The New York Times 1991 Peter Arnett CNN 1990 Mike Royko Chicago Tribune 1989 Russell Baker The New York Times 1988 David Broder The Washington Post 1987 David Brinkley ABC News 1986 Art Buchwald Syndicated Columnist 1985 Flora Lewis The New York Times 1984 Helen Thomas UPI 1983 Eric Severeid CBS News 1982 Simeon Booker Johnson Publications 1981 Nick B. Williams Los Angeles Times 1980 Theodore H. White Author 1979 Clayton Kirkpatrick Chicago Tribune 1978 Vermont Royster Wall Street Journal 1977 Herb Block The Washington Post 1976 John S. Knight Knight-Ridder Newspapers 1975 Richard Strout Christian Science Monitor & New Re 1974 James Reston The New York Times 1973 Walter Cronkite CBS News The Edwin M. Hood Diplomatic Correspondence Award Named for Edwin M. Hood, a distinguished diplomatic correspondent for the Associated Press and a founding member of the National Press Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Điệp Viên Hoàn Hảo
    Điệp Viên Hoàn Hảo Điệp Viên Hoàn Hảo Tác giả: Larry Berman Thể loại: Tiểu Thuyết Dịch giả: Nguyễn Đại Phương Website: http://motsach.info Date: 06-October-2012 (mobile version) Trang 1/657 http://motsach.info Điệp Viên Hoàn Hảo Lời Tựa Tháng 4/2007, giáo sư, nhà sử học người Mỹ Larry Berman cho ra mắt độc giả cuốn sách viết về nhà tình báo Việt Nam Phạm Xuân Ẩn với tựa đề Điệp viên hoàn hảo (Perfect Spy). Cuốn sách là công trình nghiên cứu công phu của tác giả suốt 5 năm, trong đó khắc hoạ chân dung Phạm Xuân Ẩn - một nhà tình báo nổi tiếng của chúng ta. Ngay sau khi phát hành, cuốn sách đã thu hút sự quan tâm đặc biệt của độc giả trong và ngoài nước Mỹ, trong đó có độc giả Việt Nam. Về thiếu tướng tình báo, Anh hùng lực lượng vũ trang nhân dân Phạm Xuân Ẩn, cho đến nay đã có khá nhiều tư liệu, tác phẩm, bài viết của các tác giả trong và ngoài nước đánh giá cao về ông. Tuy nhiên, còn nhiều điều "bí ẩn" trong con người Phạm Xuân Ẩn mà bạn đọc Trang 2/657 http://motsach.info Điệp Viên Hoàn Hảo muốn biết. Cuốn sách Điệp viên hoàn hảo của Larry Berman đã phần nào đáp ứng mong muốn đó của độc giả. Nếu có thể nói một điều gì chung nhất về Phạm Xuân Ẩn thì đó chính là lòng yêu nước vô bờ bến, lòng trung thành với Đảng, với ngành tình báo của một đảng viên cộng sản trung kiên, một cán bộ tình báo mẫu mực, đã cống hiến trọn đời mình cho sự nghiệp cách mạng của Đảng, của dân tộc.
    [Show full text]
  • Was M*A*S*H Really About Korea? What Part of the Culture of The
    Was M*A*S*H really about Korea? What part of the culture of the 1970’s was M*A*S*H trying to critique and what message were they trying to convey about the culture? Annastasia Bonczyk HNR‐350 Honors Research Seminar December 11, 2009 1 Part A: Abstract The Vietnam War is a fascinating topic. There is a wealth of conflicts, conspiracies, and catastrophes to study. The very fact that the US pulled out of the country in defeat is a compelling reason to study the war. The soldiers who returned were not greeted, supported, or respected by the American public, the people they were fighting for. Society left them alone to grieve the war and the situations that occurred there. Television is a popular form of entertainment. Today, it can be watched commercial free at the viewers’ convenience via online streaming sites. It was also popular in the 1960s and 70s as it brought a war from the other side of the globe into the American living room. The television sitcoms of this period are still available thanks to DVD releases and a wide variety of cable channels. I have used television as a distraction. This distraction allows me, for one hour, to enter into another world. I am the neighbor, the sister, the best friend as I experience life with the characters of the show I am watching. This can medium and experience can have a profound impact on the way we think about and interact with culture. For this reason, I am curious. Why would the citizens of the 1970s watch the television show M*A*S*H? It is full of irreverent humor about a war that the US is obviously losing.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Chapter
    Introduction No event in American history is more misunderstood than the Vietnam War. It was misreported then, and it is misremembered now. —Richard Nixon, No More Vietnams, 1994 The Vietnam War ended on April 30, 1975. For the first time in American history, the United States lost: not to another superpower, which would have been bad enough, but to a small country in Southeast Asia. “A raggedy-ass little fourth-rate country,” Lyndon Johnson said dismissively. It was a humiliating experience for a nation proud of its history of freedom, economic opportunity, and military power. A certain mood of boundless self- confidence seemed to settle into a deepening self-doubt, as though the United States, having suffered its first defeat, had reached a tipping point in its distin- guished history. Still a superpower, the United States went on to win the cold war; but the one battle of the war that it did lose, in Vietnam, had a dispropor- tionate, powerful impact on American presidents, politics, and policy. No doubt, a hundred years from now, historians will look back on this period and wonder why—given that the United States won the big war—its loss in the comparative backwater of Vietnam had so huge and lingering an impact on policymakers. Americans had enjoyed a feeling of limitless oppor- tunity. No challenge seemed insurmountable, no war unwinnable. Even dur- ing the Tet offensive in January 1968, arguably the turning point in the Viet- nam War, Secretary of State Dean Rusk pressed his thumb on a coffee table and proclaimed, with fearless self-confidence, that when the United States wanted to do something, it did it.
    [Show full text]