LCF 2018 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gastrointestinal Parasites of Captive and Free-Living Lemurs and Domestic Carnivores in Eastern Madagascar
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 47(1): 141–149, 2016 Copyright 2016 by American Association of Zoo Veterinarians GASTROINTESTINAL PARASITES OF CAPTIVE AND FREE-LIVING LEMURS AND DOMESTIC CARNIVORES IN EASTERN MADAGASCAR Amy B. Alexander, D.V.M., Cle´mence Poirotte, D.V.M., Ingrid J. Porton, M.S., Karen L.M. Freeman, Ph.D., Fidisoa Rasambainarivo, D.V.M., M.S., Kimberly G. Olson, R.V.T., Bernard Iambana, and Sharon L. Deem, D.V.M., Ph.D., Dipl. A.C.Z.M. Abstract: Fecal samples from captive and free-living lemurs at Ivoloina Zoological Park (IZP) and domestic carnivores from six villages surrounding IZP were evaluated between July and August 2012. Free-living lemurs from Betampona Natural Reserve (BNR), a relatively pristine rainforest fragment 40 km away, were also evaluated in November 2013. All 33 dogs sampled (100%) and 16 of 22 cats sampled (72.7%) were parasitized, predominantly with nematodes (strongyles, ascarids, and spirurids) as well as cestodes and protozoans. Similar types of parasites were identified in the lemur populations. Identification of spirurid nematodes and protozoans in the lemur fecal samples were of concern due to previously documented morbidity and mortality in lemurs from these parasitic agents. Twelve of 13 free-living (93%) and 31 of 49 captive (63%) lemurs sampled at IZP had a higher parasite prevalence than lemurs at BNR, with 13 of 24 (54%) being parasitized. The lemurs in BNR are likely at risk of increased exposure to these parasites and, therefore, increased morbidity and mortality, as humans and their domestic animals are encroaching on this natural area. -
A Short History of Canopy Biology
CHAPTER 23 Tarzan or Jane? A Short History of Canopy Biology Margaret D. Lowrnan Cirowing up in the midwestern United States I knew trees IPPII.I looped~firrzone bare branch to the next in the backyard red maple with, I believed, thp sp~6.d and graw (!fa monkey making its rounds. Like Kiling? Mowgli, I had the po~itio~zand strength tf tcach branch memorized. I learned how to rest my body comfortabb arrzong thp orduly boughs in order to have a clear view of my mother, small as an ant, tending I~Bgarden below. The branches I favored became burnishedjom rqeated scuings. In tim~I ident$ed with the monkey's world. I grew up to be a ~oologist. -Mark Mofett, Thc High Fronticr, 1993 Why Study the Treetops? E.O. Wilson called it "the last frontier" of biological rcscarch on thc planct (Wilson 1992). Andrrw Mitchell referred to its invisible inhabitants as "a ~vorldI could only dream of" (Mitchell 2001). Tom Lolrejoy confessed that "thc canopy rendered me the biologist's equivalent of Tantalus from the \.cry outsidc" (I,o\.r.joy 1995). And Stevc Sutton compared it to "Alice grows up" as canop); science n~o\.csfrom a scnsc of wonder to a reality of hypotheses (Sutton 2001). Nalini Nadklrni esclaimed about "trcc climbing for Lgrown-ups" (Nadkarni 2001) and I simply notcd, "hly career is not conventional. I climb trecs" (Lowman 1999). In 1985, thcsc six indi- viduals may ha1.e represented almost half of thc canopy scientists worldwidc. Today, only two decades later, thrrc arc scveral hundred explorers of Wilson's last frontier. -
Strengthening Protection of Marojejy National Park
SPECIAL POINTS DECEMBER 2016 OF INTEREST: Vol. 5, No. 2 ñ Workshop for Forest GuiDes ñ Brief but Meaningful Conservaton news from the Sambava-Andapa-Vohemar-Antalaha region of NE Madagascar ñ WorlD Lemur Festival Strengthening Protecton of Marojejy Natonal Park INSIDE THIS by Charlie Welch ISSUE: Earlier this year DLC- Strengthening Protec- 1 tion of Marojejy Na- SAVA was fortunate to tional Park receive a grant from Workshop for Forest 3 Save Our Species (SOS) Guides to increase the Brief but Meaningful 4 protecton of Marojejy Natonal Park, in World Lemur Festival 8 collaboraton with “Climate Change and 9 Madagascar Natonal Lemurs” Workshop Parks (MNP). The grant Environmental Educa- 12 supports clearly tion Teacher Training establishing and marking DLC-SAVA “Lamba” 13 the boundary with Now Available! metallic signs to prevent First CURSA Gradua- 14 both intentonal and unintentonal intrusion into the park. Although DLC-SAVA had already tion includes Sylvio sponsored delineaton of certain priority sectons of the park boundary, extensive areas in Exploring Human and 15 remote parts of Marojejy remained unmarked. There was no way for local people to know Environmental Health exactly where the boundary was supposed to be. Agricultural land ofen extends right up to in the SAVA Region the boundary around much of the park, and if Duke Engineers in 18 the limit is not clear, burning and cultvaton SAVA can actually extend into the park. A clear Closing Comments 20 boundary also discourages other illegal actvites in the park, such as wood collecton and huntng. Teams of local people, organized by MNP, installed the signs, which were made in Andapa. -
Choosing a Forest Definition for the Clean Development Mechanism )$26 FORESTS and CLIMATE CHANGE WORKING PAPER 4
Forests and Climate Change Working Paper 4 Choosing a forest definition for the Clean Development Mechanism )$26 FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE WORKING PAPER 4 CHOOSING A FOREST DEFINITION FOR THE CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM Till Neeff Heiner von Luepke Dieter Schoene Table of Contents Abstract.................................................................................................................................................. 3 Forest, afforestation and reforestation as defined for the Clean Development Mechanism .......... 3 Remaining ambiguities of definitions .................................................................................... 4 Considering existing national definitions............................................................................... 5 Choosing parameter values .................................................................................................................. 6 Furthering national policy objectives with the CDM............................................................. 7 Accommodating prior site conditions .................................................................................... 7 Facilitating project types........................................................................................................ 9 Integrating prior site conditions and project types............................................................... 10 What parameter values have NAI countries selected up to the present? ............................. 12 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... -
Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra, -
Old-Growth Forests
Pacific Northwest Research Station NEW FINDINGS ABOUT OLD-GROWTH FORESTS I N S U M M A R Y ot all forests with old trees are scientifically defined for many centuries. Today’s old-growth forests developed as old growth. Among those that are, the variations along multiple pathways with many low-severity and some Nare so striking that multiple definitions of old-growth high-severity disturbances along the way. And, scientists forests are needed, even when the discussion is restricted to are learning, the journey matters—old-growth ecosystems Pacific coast old-growth forests from southwestern Oregon contribute to ecological diversity through every stage of to southwestern British Columbia. forest development. Heterogeneity in the pathways to old- growth forests accounts for many of the differences among Scientists understand the basic structural features of old- old-growth forests. growth forests and have learned much about habitat use of forests by spotted owls and other species. Less known, Complexity does not mean chaos or a lack of pattern. Sci- however, are the character and development of the live and entists from the Pacific Northwest (PNW) Research Station, dead trees and other plants. We are learning much about along with scientists and students from universities, see the structural complexity of these forests and how it leads to some common elements and themes in the many pathways. ecological complexity—which makes possible their famous The new findings suggest we may need to change our strat- biodiversity. For example, we are gaining new insights into egies for conserving and restoring old-growth ecosystems. canopy complexity in old-growth forests. -
Greater Bamboo Lemur Madagascar
Madagascar Greater Bamboo Lemur Prolemur simus (Gray, 1871) Madagascar (2002, 2004, 2006, 2008) Patricia C. Wright, Eileen Larney, Edward E. Louis Jr., Rainer Dolch & Radoniana R. Rafaliarison The greater bamboo lemur (Prolemur simus) is the largest of Madagascar’s bamboo-eating lemurs (Albrecht et al. 1990) and the most critically endangered lemur in Madagascar (Ganzhorn et al. 1996, 1997; Konstant et al. 2006; Mittermeier et al. 2006; Ganzhorn and Johnson 2007; Wright et al. 2008). Although its placement in Prolemur has been questioned (for example, Tattersall 2007), it now represents a monospecific genus, based on a suite of distinctive dental and chromosomal characteristics (Vuillaume-Randriamanantena et al. 1985; Macedonia and Stanger 1994) that support its separation from the genus Hapalemur (cf. Groves 2001). Genetic studies further suggest that Hapalemur may, in fact, be more months, while it relies on its shoots and leaves at other closely related to the genus Lemur (Rumpler et al. times of the year. Prolemur simus supplements its diet 1989; Macedonia and Stanger 1994; Stanger-Hall 1997; with fruits, flowers, soil and fungi (Meier and Rumpler Fausser et al., 2002). Prolemur simus also differs from 1987; Tan 1999, 2000; Wright et al. 2008; R. Dolch, J. L. other bamboo lemurs in behavioral and ecological Fiely, J. Rafalimandimby, E. E. Louis Jr. unpubl. data). variation. Historical records (Schwarz 1931) and sub- Greater bamboo lemurs are cathemeral and fossil remains confirm that it was once widespread gregarious, with observed group sizes ranging up to throughout the island (Godfrey and Vuillaume- 28 individuals (Santini-Palka 1994; Tan 1999, 2000). -
Canopy Arthropod Community Structure and Herbivory in Old-Growth and Regenerating Forests in Western Oregon
318 Canopy arthropod community structure and herbivory in old-growth and regenerating forests in western Oregon T. D. SCHOWALTER Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-2907, UtS.A. Received June 30, 1988 Accepted October 19, 1988 SCHOWALTER, T. D. 1989. Canopy arthropod community structure and herbivory in old-growth and regenerating forests in western Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 318-322. This paper describes differences in canopy arthropod community structure and herbivory between old-growth and regenerating coniferous forests at the H. 3. Andrews Experimental Forest in western Oregon. Species diversity and functional diversity were much higher in canopies of old-growth trees compared with those of young trees. Aphid bio- mass in young stands was elevated an order of magnitude over biomass in old-growth stands. This study indicated a shift in the defoliator/sap-sucker ratio resulting from forest conversion, as have earlier studies at Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina. These data indicated that the taxonomically distinct western coniferous and eastern deciduous forests show similar trends in functional organization of their canopy arthropod communities. SCHOWALTER, T. D. 1989. Canopy arthropod community structure and herbivory in old-growth and regenerating forests in western Oregon. Can. J. For. Res. 19 : 318-322. Cet article expose les differences observees dans la structure communautaire des arthropodes du couvert foliace et des herbivores entre des forets de coniferes de premiere venue et en regeneration a la Foret experimentale H. J. Andrews dans louest de lOregon. La diversit y des especes ainsi que la diversit y fonctionnelle etaient beaucoup plus grandes dans les couverts foliaces des vieux arbres que dans ceux des jeunes arbres. -
In Situ Conservation
NEWSN°17/DECEMBER 2020 Editorial IN SITU CONSERVATION One effect from 2020 is for sure: Uncertainty. Forward planning is largely News from the Little Fireface First, our annual SLOW event was impossible. We are acting and reacting Project, Java, Indonesia celebrated world-wide, including along the current situation caused by the By Prof K.A.I. Nekaris, MA, PhD by project partners Kukang Rescue Covid-19 pandemic. All zoos are struggling Director of the Little Fireface Project Program Sumatra, EAST Vietnam, Love economically after (and still ongoing) Wildlife Thailand, NE India Primate temporary closures and restricted business. The Little Fireface Project team has Investments in development are postponed Centre India, and the Bangladesh Slow at least. Each budget must be reviewed. been busy! Despite COVID we have Loris Project, to name a few. The end In the last newsletter we mentioned not been able to keep up with our wild of the week resulted in a loris virtual to forget about the support of the in situ radio collared slow lorises, including conference, featuring speakers from conservation efforts. Some of these under welcoming many new babies into the the helm of the Prosimian TAG are crucial 11 loris range countries. Over 200 for the survival of species – and for a more family. The ‘cover photo’ you see here people registered, and via Facebook sustainable life for the people involved in is Smol – the daughter of Lupak – and Live, more than 6000 people watched rd some of the poorest countries in the world. is our first 3 generation birth! Having the event. -
Lemurs of Madagascar a Strategy for !Eir Conservation 2013–2016
Lemurs of Madagascar A Strategy for !eir Conservation 2013–2016 Edited by Christoph Schwitzer, Russell A. Mittermeier, Nicola Davies, Steig Johnson, Jonah Ratsimbazafy, Josia Raza"ndramanana, Edward E. Louis Jr., and Serge Rajaobelina Illustrations and layout by Stephen D. Nash IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation Conservation International !is publication was supported by the Conservation International/Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation Primate Action Fund, the Bristol, Cli#on and West of England Zoological Society, Houston Zoo, the Institute for the Conservation of Tropical Environments, and Primate Conservation, Inc. Published by: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, and Conservation International Copyright: © 2013 IUCN Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Inquiries to the publisher should be directed to the following address: Russell A. Mittermeier, Chair, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA Citation: Schwitzer C, Mittermeier RA, Davies N, Johnson S, Ratsimbazafy J, Raza"ndramanana J, Louis Jr. EE, Rajaobelina S (eds). 2013. Lemurs of Madagascar: A Strategy for !eir Conservation 2013–2016. Bristol, UK: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, and Conservation International. 185 pp. ISBN: 978-1-934151-62-4 Illustrations: © Stephen D. Nash, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, and Department of Anatomical Sciences, Health Sciences Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY Layout: Stephen D. -
Lemur Bounce!
Assets – Reections Icon Style CoverAssets Style – Reections 1 Icon Style Y E F O N Cover StyleR O M M R A A Y E F D O N C A S R O GA M M R A D A AGASC LemurVISUAL Bounce! BRAND LearningGuidelines and Sponsorship Pack VISUAL BRAND Guidelines 2 Lemur Bounce nni My name is Lennie Le e Bounce with me B .. ou and raise money to n c protect my Rainforest e L ! home! L MfM L 3 What is a Lemur Bounce? A Lemur Bounce is a sponsored event for kids to raise money by playing bouncing games. In this pack: * Learning fun for kids including facts and quizzes Indoor crafts and outside bouncing games for * the Lemur Bounce Day * Links to teaching resources for schools * Lesson planning ideas for teachers * Everything you need for a packed day of learning and fun! Contents Fun Bounce activities Page No. Let’s BounceBounce – YourLemur valuable support 5 n n Lemur Bouncee i e L – Basics 7 B u o Planningn for a Lemur Bounce Day 8 c L e Lemur! Bounce Day Assembly 8 Make L a Lemur Mask 9 Make a Lemur Tail & Costume 10 Games 11-12 Sponsorship Forms 13-14 Assets – Reections M f Certificates 15-20 Icon Style M Cover Style L Y E F O N R Fun Indoor activities O M M R A Planning your lessons for a Lemur Bounce Day 22 D A A SC GA Fun Facts about Madagascar 23 Fun Facts about Lemurs 24 Colouring Template 25 VISUAL BRAND Guidelines Word Search 26 Know your Lemurs 27 Lemur Quiz 28 Madagascar Quiz 29-31 Resources 32 Song and Dance 33 Contact us 34 LEMUR BOUNCE BOUNCE fM FOR MfM LEMUR BASICS Y NE FO O R WHAT ‘LEM OUNC“ ‘ DO YOU KNOW YOUR LEMUR M Have you ever seen a lemur bounce? Maaasar is ome to over 0 seies o endemi lemurs inluding some M very ouncy ones lie the Siaa lemur ut tese oreous rimates are highl endangere e need to at R Let’s Bounce - Your valuable support A no to sae teir aitat and rotect tem rom etin tion arity Mone or Maaasar is alling out to A D C Wherechildren does everywhere the money to organizego? a fun charity ‘lemur bounce’. -
A Northward Extension of Known Range for Broad-Striped Vontsira Galidictis Fasciata
A northward extension of known range for Broad-striped Vontsira Galidictis fasciata Abstract A. F. A. HAWKINS Galidictis fasciata the species’s known range northwards about 100 km. A Broad-striped Vontsira was seen in 1996 in Marojejy National Park, north-eastern Madagascar, extending Keywords Fihitarana: endemic, mianavaratra Eupleridae, Madagascar,ny toerana Marojejy fantatra National fa hahitana Park ny Vontsira Fotsy Galidictis fasciata Famintinana Galidictis fasciata atsinanan’i Madagasikara. Io fandinihana io dia manitatra ny toerana fantatra fa misy ity biby ity mianavaratra eo amin’ny 100 kilometraNahitana Vontsira eo ho eo. Fotsy tamin’ny 1996 tao amin’ny valan-javaboary ny Marojejy ao amin’ny faritra avaratra Galidictis fasciata bility of confusion with any other Malagasy rainforest species, native or otherwise, given the white tail, nocturnal behaviour ThreatenedThe nocturnal on Broad-stripedThe IUCN Red ListVontsira of Threatened Species (Eu- pleridae), endemic to Madagascar and categorised as Near Vontsira G. grandidieri is only known from dry forest in the far (IUCN and body striped black and pale-grey. The similar Grandidier’s ern2012), rainforest is known belt from as far Makira, as its southernat around limit 15°15'S, at Andohahe 49°35'E (Goodman 2012), south along the length of the island’s eteast al-. wardssouthwest about of 100Madagascar km, from (Goodman Makira to 2012).almost the northeastern - limit Thisof eastern extends rainforest. the known This distribution sighting isof withinthe species the known north- la (Goodman 1999) and Tsitongambarika (Ravoangy 2011). Goodman (2003) stated that the species had not, by ofthat its time, occurrence been definitely around therecorded forests further of the northAndapa than Basin.