1 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Dutch newspapers at war:

An empirical study investigating how De Volkskrant and De Telegraaf covered the Dutch

military mission in Afghanistan from 2006-2013 by drawing on theories of sourcing and

framing in times of war

Naomi Horstkamp

University of Amsterdam

11903554

Master’s Thesis

Graduate School of Communication

Political Communication

Penny Sheets Thibaut

31 January 2020

7938 Words

2 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Abstract

To critically analyse the journalistic standards of Dutch newspapers during wartime, this study draws on theories of framing, sourcing and war journalism. Previous studies showed that democratic journalistic standards cannot be taken for granted in times of conflict.

Therefore, this study uses quantitative content analysis to explore how De Volkskrant (n =

192) and De Telegraaf (n = 196) covered the Dutch military mission in Afghanistan between

2006 and 2013. The analysis found that Dutch newspapers tend to use positive frames more often to cover the mission. Despite that, it seems like De Volkskrant reports more balanced in terms of critically using frames, whereas De Telegraaf uses more personalisation to cover the conflict. Furthermore, this study found that newspapers used elite sources more often in their coverage, but there was no significant difference. Overall, this study gives interesting insights into the democratic role of the top two national Dutch newspapers in wartime. The analysis supports the literature on sourcing and framing as well as to the theory of indexing hypothesis and the literature on national identity’s influence on the news.

Keywords: framing, sourcing, media coverage, journalism, wartime, conflict

3 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Dutch newspapers at war:

An empirical study investigating how De Volkskrant and De Telegraaf covered the Dutch

military mission in Afghanistan from 2006-2013 by drawing on theories of sourcing and

framing in times of war.

In December 2019, the “Afghanistan papers”, published by The Washington Post, revealed that the public has been consistently misled about an unwinnable war. Hundreds of interviews with key actors showed that U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the

Afghanistan war, and the U.S. government used false information and hid evidence that the war became unwinnable (Whitlock, 2019). These papers illustrate that journalism is needed in times of war. However, fulfilling quality journalism in times of war is easier said than done.

A quote from Dutch journalist Nathalie Righton, from an interview in the documentary

Extreem Leven, clearly illustrates the problem war journalists are facing:

An injured girl is carried outside on a stretcher. In the letters that the Dutch

government has sent to the House of Representatives about the military mission in

Afghanistan, the word ‘war’ did not even appear, the word ‘attack’ did not occur and

the word ‘violence’ was not mentioned. Instead, the word ‘training’ appeared 140

times, the word ‘security’ occurred 64 times. For me, this has become a symbol that

Defence Information Officers are saying that things are going the right direction, but

this was literally not the case. I saw it happen in front of my eyes. (De Brouwer, 2013)

The example raises the question of whether journalists can perform their basic principles such as fact-checking, striving for objectivity and adversarial journalism in times of war when situations are complex and dangerous. Furthermore, how can journalists maintain their professional standards when they do not receive complete information?

Media coverage in times of war has been an object of research for a long time. In most

Western societies it is expected from a journalist to act as a watchdog and truth speaker by

4 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME reporting objectively, trying to inform the public in the best possible way and hereby, strive to serve the common good (Entman & Page, 1994; Taylor, 2003; Kristensen & Ørsten, 2007).

Interestingly, even though scholars agree that media should be critical and independent, there is little evidence that media act this way during wartime (Bennett, 1990; DeCillia, 2018;

Hallin, 1986). Their responsibility is often challenged by several factors such as the availability of sources, journalistic routines and journalists’ ethical and cultural backgrounds

(Schoemaker & Reese, 1996; Nossek, 2004). This is threatening because journalism in times of conflict is more needed than ever as a war is not only a battle of weapons but also a battle of opinions (Nord & Strömbäck, 2006). Furthermore, previous studies showed that political and military sources and their frames are prominent in the media during wartime (Bennett,

1990). This is remarkable, given that the study of Nord and Strömbäck (2006) found that these sources are trying to manipulate media coverage and cover the truth.

Since 2001 the Dutch military became active in the Afghan provinces of Uruzgan and

Kunduz. This turned out to be the biggest contribution of Dutch soldiers since the Korean

War (De Graaf & Dimitriu, 2016; Veteraneninstituut, 2014). Over time, Dutch citizens never supported the missions with an absolute majority, but the support was just a bit higher in the beginning of the mission in Uruzgan, than at the end in Kunduz (Rijksoverheid, 2014; Van

Bommel, 2012; Van der Meulen & Vos, 2012). Even though the public is more than 5000 kilometres away from Afghanistan, they still have the right to get extensive information and facts which gives them the ability to make the best possible decision about the actions of the military, the society and their government (Kolodzy, 2013). As the public support stayed quite stable over time, it would be interesting to see how Dutch newspapers covered the conflict.

For example, did news media report more positive about the mission? Investigating how

Dutch media covered the conflict is needed as the public uses newspapers as their source of information (Cozma & Kozman, 2015).

5 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Research into framing and sourcing in times of war is not new, however, previous studies did not investigate how Dutch media covered the military mission in Afghanistan. By the use of a content analysis, this study tries to gain more insight about what type of frames and sources news media used to cover the military mission. Therefore, the central goal of this paper is to have a critical look at the quality of Dutch media in times of war by looking at theories of framing and sourcing. As mentioned before, previous studies showed that media do not always fulfil their democratic responsibility in times of war. So, there are good reasons to reconsider the role of Dutch news media covering the Dutch military mission in

Afghanistan. This led to the following research question: How did Dutch newspapers cover the military mission in Afghanistan?

Theoretical Framework

Role of media in democracy

One of the most discussed issues in the field of political communication is the independence of the press and their role in democracy. This is because not only does journalism needs democracy, but democracy also needs journalism (McNair, 2009). Drawing on theories of framing and sourcing in news media, this study tries to investigate how Dutch media covered the military mission in Afghanistan and if Dutch media met their democratic responsibility or not.

It is important for media organizations in a democracy to act as a watchdog (Nord,

2007; Weaver & Willnat, 2012). The watchdog function suggests that media critically look over the ones in power, like the government, businesses or other influentials in society

(McNair, 2009). Other important functions of media in a democracy are that they should strive to cover the best possible reflection of reality and logically inform the public.

Furthermore, media should report news factually, balanced and critically (Bennett &

Lawrence, & Livingston, 2008; Entman & Page, 1994; Gans, 1998; Nord & Strömbäck, 2006;

6 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Taylor, 2003). But scholars also recognize that true neutrality is impossible; whenever the media covers an event, they must choose a certain angle from which they tell a news story.

This is called framing. The question becomes, then, to what extent certain frames are capable of conveying factual, balanced and critical information in times of war.

Framing. The concept of framing has been widely discussed in the field of communication and as the concept is complex, different authors do not agree on a clear-cut definition (Cacciatore, Scheufele, & Iyengar, 2016; Entman, 1993; Lecheler & De Vreese,

2011). However, most scholars agree that by framing, media choose how to tell and construct a story and hereby give meaning to series of events and help the audience to understand issues

(Brewer & Gross, 2010; De Vreese, 2005; Gamson & Modigliani, 1989; McCombs, 2013).

Moreover, Entman (1993) states that media provide audiences with schemas for interpreting events: “To frame is to select some aspects of a perceived reality and make them more salient in a communication text, in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment recommendation” (p.52).

An important element of framing is frame-building, which refers to factors that influence news frames. This can be internal factors such as journalistic routines, for example, the personal interpretation of a journalist of what the conflict is and journalists’ endorsement with the conflict can shape how news stories are selected. But also, external factors can play a role such as frames offered by important actors, like governmental or military officials, to inform journalists about the conflict (Bennett, 1990; Brüggemann, 2014; Gans, 1979; Philo &

Berry, 2004; Schoemaker & Reese, 1996). Frames are a powerful tool for journalists. It contains a process which helps the audience to make sense of the world and it offers journalists the ability to determine how the audience understands and remembers the conflict.

In other words, frames determine how Dutch citizens are informed about the military mission in Afghanistan.

7 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Sources. As described above, journalists have the power to present a certain view of reality to their audience. One means of doing so is to rely on specific news sources. Sources are the backbone of a news story because they offer information and give meaning to information (Cozma & Kozman, 2015). As a result, they have the power to shape and structure the news production process and are part of the framing game (Gonen, 2018; Pan &

Kosicki, 2001; Reese, 1991). Especially in times of international conflict news sources help to shape journalists understanding of the conflict, for example, because of language barriers

(Seib, 2002). Previous research found that source diversity in media is important as it can not only affect the news frames but also the public perceptions of the covered issues, the credibility of media and journalism as a profession (Cozma, 2014; Cozma & Kozman, 2015;

Hansen, 1991). Moreover, the audience relies on information from the media to be self- governing. Therefore, it is important to have a closer look at the use of sources in Dutch news media as they can influence the information which the audience receives.

Role of media in times of conflict

As mentioned before, one of the most important responsibilities of journalists is to act as a watchdog. This becomes even more important in times of conflict because journalists are working in a complex political landscape full of tension and propaganda (Allan & Zelizer,

2004). However, previous studies showed that especially in times of war, the normative foundations of journalism are under pressure. Therefore, the following section will focus on the role of journalism in times of conflict.

Journalists are facing numerous problems when trying to report the truth and trying to be balanced and responsible (Allan & Zelizer, 2004; DeCillia, 2018; Kristensen & Ørsten,

2007). To illustrate, the availability of sources is low in times of conflict (Cooper & Kuypers,

2004). As a result, sources who have access to media can construct and frame the news depending on their power, which leads to less critical reporting (Bennett, 1990; Hänggli,

8 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

2012). For example, the study of Bennett, Lawrence and Livingston (2008) showed that, over the last couple of years, American newspapers focused too much on anti-terrorism and lost their critical tone of voice. But it was no coincidence as it was carefully constructed by the

Bush administration.

The prominence of elite sources and frames is the news is one of the reasons that the power and agenda of news frames and sources have been examined often in mass communication literature when addressing the news production process in wartime (Bennett,

1990; Gans, 1979; Kothari, 2010; Nygren et al., 2016). These studies mostly focus on

European and American corporations, experts and government officials. Findings show that

Western news media tend to rely on official channels and the official sources as they are considered to be credible. On the other hand, these sources are also held responsible to support their own side (Arif, Golan, & Moritz, 2014; Bennett, Lawrence, & Livingston, 2008;

DeCillia, 2018; Kothari, 2010; Rowling, Sheets, & Jones, 2015). This is contradicting as media strive to be objective, but in times of conflict, they seem to narrow their view and let go of their journalistic standards. Therefore, the following section will give an explanation of why media tend to rely on official sources and are more likely to cover the mission in favour of their country. Moreover, what is expected to find in Dutch newspapers covering the military mission in Afghanistan.

Indexing hypothesis

One of the reasons that elite sources and their frames are more frequently present in news media can be explained by the indexing hypothesis. The indexing hypothesis suggests that official sources have privileged access to media because of their status or claims to have expert knowledge (Bennett, 1990). As a result, different perspectives from different elites are frequently represented in the news (Gans, 1979). One of the main critiques is that if news media use official and elite sources, they are rarely critical of issues or policy decisions. Since

9 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME elite sources are more frequently covered in news media in times of war, frames emphasised by these officials are also frequently confirmed in the press (Bennett, 1990; Rowling, Sheets,

& Jones, 2015; Woods, 2007). To illustrate, the Canadian government and military officials used phrases as ‘reconstruction’, ‘hope’ and ‘restoring’ when mentioning the mission in

Afghanistan to create support among the public (Woods, 2007).

As mentioned before, it is more likely to find official sources and views in news media which show alignment with the government’s standpoints about the conflict (Bennett, 1990).

Therefore, it is expected to find the same for the Dutch government and military officials.

From the start of the mission, the Dutch government and military phrased the aim of the mission by using ‘3D - Dutch approach’. They focused on 3 parts: 1) Development, 2)

Diplomacy and 3) Defence (Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, 2019). In other words, when

Dutch officials spoke about the mission, they focused on the reconstruction and development of Afghanistan. They stressed that the mission aimed to train Afghan police and helped by constructing civil projects. However, they did not mention that the mission could become a combat mission (Van der Lijn & Van der Berg, 2011; Van der Lijn, 2015). If the media cover these sources more often, this leads to less objective and critical reporting. Moreover, people may understand that both missions were related to the development of civil and democratic institutions in Afghanistan, and will know less about possible wrongdoing.

National identity

Not only are elite sources and their frames prominent in the news because of their relationship with the field and claims to be expert. The following section will give another explanation of why news media tend to be more supportive of the mission. Previous studies showed that national identity plays an important role in media coverage during wartime too

(Gonen, 2018; Nossek, 2004). In other words, news media tend to be more national driven in their coverage in times of conflict. War coverage confronts journalist with a dilemma.

10 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Journalists aim to stick to their professionality, but this is challenged by their ethical and cultural background which often leads to a more national focus in the news (Gonen, 2018;

Nossek, 2004; Zandberg & Neiger, 2005). Whenever an event occurs, a journalist tries to define what has happened and decides how to present the story. In his study, Nossek (2004) argues that journalists and editors maintain two frames when covering foreign news, namely the professional frame and national frame. This national frame explains the domestication and localization of news stories, and determines whether a journalist covers the conflict as

‘ours’ or ‘theirs’. The personal pronouns such as ‘us’ and ‘we’ create a feeling of unity and sameness. Whereas pronouns such as ‘they’, ‘them’ and ‘theirs’ create a distance between groups (Kenix, 2015). Previous studies suggest that conflict tend to perceive more coverage when journalists use the ‘us-them’ narrative (Galtung & Fisher, 2013). But it can also be used as a tool to build a community and mobilize support among the public (Anderson, 1991;

Sosale, 2010). However, when journalists are more national focused, they are more supportive towards their side and this leads to less professionalism (Allan & Zelizer, 2004; Baden &

Tenenboim-Weinblatt, 2018; Nossek, 2004; Robinson, 2004).

To conclude, it is more likely that news media are more supportive of the military mission because of the indexing hypothesis and theory of national identity. During wartime, news media do not cover a range of different voices, stays close to governmental and military statements and support their own nation. It is, therefore, expected that Dutch newspapers use elite sources more often and frame stories by stressing the relevance of the mission based on frames supported by military and governmental institutions and report in favour of the Dutch military mission.

H1a: Dutch newspapers covering the military mission in Afghanistan rely more on elite

sources than non-elite sources.

11 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

H1b: Dutch newspapers covering the military mission in Afghanistan use positive

frames more than negative frames.

Differences per newspaper

It is possible, of course, that not only Dutch newspapers exhibit these patterns uniformly. Scholars often distinguish, for example, between quality and tabloid journalism in terms of how coverage tends to look (Wahl-Jorgensen & Hanitzsch, 2019). There is no clear- cut distinction between quality and tabloid newspapers in the Netherlands (Bakker &

Scholten, 2011). However, previous studies showed that some types of newspapers focus more on quality and hard news (quality newspapers) and other types of newspapers give more attention to sensationalism and soft news (popular newspapers) (Aarts & Semetko, 2003;

Walter & Vliegenthart, 2010). Furthermore, Boukes and Vliegenthart (2017) argue that people who read popular newspapers (e.g. De Telegraaf) are less interested in the news than people who read quality newspapers (e.g. De Volkskrant). Therefore, the focus of popular newspapers is more on the personification of news, whereas, quality newspapers strive to be objective and present different perspectives on an issue (Boumans, Boomgaarden, &

Vliegenthart, 2013; Landert, 2014).

When looking at media coverage in times of conflict, Carpenter (2007) found that popular newspapers are facing difficulties and challenges to report the conflict because they cannot enter the field easily. Therefore, popular newspapers rely more on regional (Dutch) sources and report on local dimensions of the war which translates into softer coverage like personalisation. On the other hand, quality newspapers tend to cover the event more balanced and use more resources because they can send reporters to the area of conflict (Carpenter,

2007; Dimitrova & Strömback, 2008). Previous studies showed that even though the number of official sources is relatively high in quality newspapers, journalists still strive to report a critical and balanced picture of reality, and are also more negative towards the military

12 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME mission (Dimitrova & Strömbäck, 2005; Dimitrova & Strömbäck, 2008). Based on these patterns, the following hypotheses arise:

H2a: De Volkskrant uses more elite sources to cover the military mission in

Afghanistan than De Telegraaf.

H2b: De Volkskrant uses more negative frames to cover the military mission in

Afghanistan than De Telegraaf.

H2c: De Telegraaf uses more personalisation to cover the military mission in

Afghanistan than De Volkskrant.

H2d: De Volkskrant challenges positive frames more when covering the military

mission in Afghanistan than De Telegraaf.

Differences over time

Recent research suggests that factors such as globalization, commercialization, technology changes and the rise of social media led to a reduction of elite control in news media in times of conflict (Al-Ghazzi, 2014; Gonen, 2018; Mythen, 2010). Still, elite sources seem to be dominant in news media, but nowadays ordinary people can enter news media more easily (Gonen, 2018). To illustrate, the concept of ‘citizen journalism’ became extremely popular since the rise of social media (Hermida, Lewis, & Zamith, 2014). Hereby, the public has an active role in the communication process because it gives the possibility to an individual to take over the role of a journalist by spontaneously participating in times of conflict, crisis, accident or tragedy (Allan, 2013; Bowman & Willis, 2003; Mythen, 2010).

This said, newspapers will rely on political statements and expert opinions most, but it is expected to find a more critical voice in news media over time because of the rise of non-elite sources and the ability to a wider range of information (Gonen, 2018). As it is expected that the use of non-elite sources will increase over time, it is also expected that newspapers report more negative and critically about the mission.

13 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

H3a: Over time, newspapers use non-elite sources more often to cover the Dutch

military mission in Afghanistan.

H3b: Over time, newspapers use negative frames more often to cover the military

mission in Afghanistan.

H3c: Over time, newspapers will challenge positive frames more often to cover the

mission in Afghanistan.

Context

Before proceeding to the methods section, a brief overview of the Dutch-NATO mission is warranted. After the 9/11 terror attacks, the United States started a military operation in Afghanistan which aimed to dismantle al-Qaeda and remove the Taliban from power to create a stable government in Afghanistan (BBC News, 2019). They only got support from NATO since 2003 (NATO, 2020). The Netherlands became active in

Afghanistan in 2001 but were mainly operating with military personnel between 2006 and

2013 in the provinces of Uruzgan and Kunduz (Ministerie van Defensie, n.d.; NATO, 2020).

From 2006 till 2010, the Dutch military was active in the Afghan province of Uruzgan after a request from NATO. This turned out to be the largest involvement of Dutch military since the Korean War (De Graaf & Dimitriu, 2016). According to the Ministry of Defence, the main aim of the mission was to ‘make Uruzgan safe’, ‘routing terrorists’ and ‘helping women and children’ (Ministerie van Defensie, n.d.; Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken,

2019; Veteraneninstituut, 2014). However, the operation quickly escalated into a combat mission (Het Parool, 2007). Furthermore, parties in the government disagreed about the extension of the mission which led to the withdrawal of coalition partner PvdA and the fall of the Balkenende IV government (Nu.nl, 2010).

However, this was not the end of the Dutch military contribution to NATO missions in

Afghanistan. From 2011 onwards, the Dutch military, police and other experts trained Afghan

14 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME police in Kunduz. Their input mainly focused on supporting and strengthening Afghan authorities and enforcing the rule of law in the region (Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken,

2019; Veteraneninstituut, 2014). The mission was intended to run from 2011 until the summer of 2014. However, the police mission ended earlier because of several external influences

(Rijksoverheid, 2014). For example, the German military left the province, as a result, the safety of Dutch military could no longer be guaranteed. From 2013 onwards, the Dutch military stayed active in Kunduz, but with significantly fewer numbers (Trouw, 2013).

Previous studies examining the Afghanistan mission focused on specific military forces rather than a NATO mission (DeCillia, 2018; Nord & Strömbäck, 2006). However, as the biggest contribution of the Dutch military was a partnership between different NATO Allies and partners, it would be interesting to see how Dutch newspapers mentioned the military mission at home. Did they more often report about the Dutch, NATO or another country’s mission?

This contributes to the literature as it tries to identify how Dutch audiences were informed about the military missions in Afghanistan, and thus, understand and remember the mission

(De Vreese, 2005). Therefore, the following research question was developed:

RQ1: If Dutch newspapers mentioned the military mission in Afghanistan, did they explicitly mention this in connection to the Dutch troops, NATO troops in general, or troops from another country?

Methods Research Design

The hypotheses were tested through quantitative content analysis. Content analysis can be defined as “the systematic, objective, quantitative analysis of message characteristics”

(Neuendorf, 2002, p.1). Furthermore, the research tool is often used to examine news content

(Riffe, Lacy, Fico, & Watson, 2019). The strength of a content analysis is that it counts the media output and gives insights over time through the analysis of text. On the other hand, coding entails some interpretation and can be reductive. It can also fail to explain why

15 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME something gets covered as it only looks at the media output (Scheepers, Tobi, & Boeije,

2016). However, a content analysis fits this study the best as the topic showed its advantage in analysing news content, which fits the coverage of newspapers in wartime (DeCillia, 2018;

Neuendorf, 2002).

Sample & Procedure

To develop the sample, several criteria needed to be established. First of all, the type of newspapers used to analyse the coverage needed to be selected. According to Boukes and

Vliegenthart (2017), De Telegraaf can be seen as a popular news outlet, whereas De

Volkskrant is a quality newspaper. When looking at the Mediamonitor (n.d.), the most recent statistics of 2018 showed that the newspapers who reached the most people are 1) Algemeen

Dagblad, 2) De Telegraaf 3) Metro and 4) De Volkskrant. In total, Algemeen Dagblad consisted of one national newspaper and seven regional newspapers. These news articles, however, were not suitable for usage in this study as there was a possibility that newspapers were to overlap. In addition to that, newspapers (could) have a specific tendency to focus more on regional news instead of political affairs. Metro is excluded as well because the content of the newspapers was less political and affairs-focused. This, in turn, does not fit the requirements of this study. After applying the criteria, the top two national newspapers – one quality, De Volkskrant and - one tabloid, De Telegraaf were selected for the analysis. By using the search string “Nederland AND missie OR NAVO AND Afghanistan OR Uruzgan OR

Oeroezgan OR Kunduz” within the NexisUni database, for the period 01-01-1995 through 31-

12-2020, 2660 articles were found. De Volkskrant published n = 1766 articles and De

Telegraaf n = 894. This constituted the sampling frame of all coverage of Dutch/NATO mission in Afghanistan since 1995.

Results of the study were made generalizable by the means of multi-stage sampling.

The decision was made to use probability stratified sampling because this research is

16 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME interested in a specific time period for two specific newspapers. Within the sampling frame, most articles were published between the beginning of 2006 and the end of 2011. This is in line with the period were the Dutch military were the most active (Ministerie van

Buitenlandse Zaken, 2019). In the period from 2006 till 2010, the Dutch military joined

NATO Task Force Uruzgan. From 2011 till mid 2013, the military actively joined the NATO safety mission in Kunduz (Veteraneninstituut, 2014). To make sure that these active years were selected, the sampling frame was narrowed to 01-01- 2006 through 31-12-2013. This includes N = 1886 articles, consisting of n = 1254 from De Volkskrant and n = 632 from De

Telegraaf.

From this narrowed sampling frame, simple random sampling without replacement was used to draw a sample from these two newspapers. To meet the requirements of .05 probability level used in this study, at least 126 Volkskrant and 64 Telegraaf articles should be analysed in this study, as this illustrates 10% of the total sample (DeCillia, 2018; King &

Zayani, 2008). An overview of the number of articles per year can be found in Appendix I.

After coding the articles, 12 news articles were deleted because their topic was not relevant or none of the frames were present. This made the total sample consist of N = 388 news articles from De Telegraaf (n = 196) and De Volkskrant (n = 192).

Codebook development

The unit of data collection was the entire news article, including the headline. In order to develop the codebook, frames and sources were identified based on previous literature and explanatory findings. More information on specific codes can be found in the following section. To improve the codebook, pilot training was performed by the researcher. After revisions and clarifications were made while training the second coder, a final coding scheme was developed. The codebook can be found in Appendix II.

17 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

In total, 10% of the articles (N = 40) were coded independently by a second coder, for intercoder reliability purposes (Neuendorf, 2002). The ICR was tested by Hayes macro for

Krippendorff’s Alpha to estimate the reliability of the study (Hayes & Krippendorff, 2007).

Alpha levels from >.67 onwards are seen as sufficient for this study; scores higher than >.90 are excellent. Values lower than .67 were critically analysed and should be interpreted with caution as this is the threshold of good reliability (De Swert, 2012). The specific values for each subframe will be presented in the following sections alongside the explanation of each subframe.

Measures

Media coverage was operationalized in this study as both frames and sources.

Frames. First of all, the study tried to investigate if there was a difference in the frames used to cover the conflict. These frames were divided into 3 categories; the first one was ‘Positive frames’ which includes the subframes of reconstruction, mentoring, diplomacy, international status and decrease of violence. These frames were derived from reports which reflected on the Dutch military missions and using an inductive approach by exploring patterns in news articles (Van der Lijn & Van der Berg, 2011; Van der Lijn, 2015). The frames include, for example, that the Dutch mission aims to reconstruct Afghanistan and wants to create a better future for the citizens or when an article mentions that Dutch military help Afghan police to become stronger.

The second cluster of frames was ‘Personalisation’, which included the subframes of brave soldiers and personalisation. This includes for example, when an article mentions that a fearless soldier got wounded (coded as brave soldiers) or when an article includes an interview with the family of the soldier (coded as personalisation).

Finally, a cluster of ‘Negative frames’ included the subframes doubts about the mission, the downfall of the mission, Afghanistan is becoming less safe and a combat mission

18 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

(DeCillia, 2018). This latter frame includes, for example, when the article mentions that the military mission turned out to become a combat mission instead of its intended peacekeeping purpose. All frames except for personalisation and doubts were measured on a 3-point scale: 0

= not present, 1 = present and frame is challenged, and 2 = present and frame is not challenged. A frame was considered ‘challenged’ when it includes the subframe but it was also contradicted in some way. For example, when an article mentioned that the mission aimed to restore democracy in Afghanistan (reconstruction frame) but also showed numbers which illustrated that the military had difficulties to achieve this. A frame was considered ‘not challenged’ when an article mentioned only the subframe. For example, when an article mentioned that mission helped to reconstruct democracy in Afghanistan (reconstruction frame). Such coding allowed me not only to gauge the presence of frames across news but also to see how journalists – through their own framing or that of other sources – challenged or resisted these frames. The Personalisation and Doubts frames were only measured by 0 = not present and 1 = present because it was not relevant or feasible for articles to challenge these frames. An explanation of the recoded variables used for analyses will follow in the results section to be sure that the analyses will be understood correctly. The ICR values for these frames ranged from .66 to .98, as can be seen in Table 1. Afghanistan is becoming less safe frame only scored .66, but as it is on the edge of acceptable and was merged into a cluster, the variable was included but should be carefully interpreted.

19 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Table 1 Intercoder reliability and frames Krippendorff’s Alpha Reconstruction frame .95 Mentoring frame .98 Diplomacy frame .88 International status frame .87 Decrease of violence frame .97 Brave soldiers frame .76 Personalisation frame .77 Doubts frame .75 The Downfall of the mission frame .85 Afghanistan is becoming less safe frame .66 Combat mission frame .84 Note. ICR is calculated by Hayes macro for Krippendorff’s Alpha

Sources. Type of sources was measured by the number of elite and non-elite sources.

The number of Dutch, other Western, Afghan and other elite and non-elite sources was simply counted, as it was aimed to indicate the number of elite and non-elite sources in the articles

(Bennett, 1990; Bennett, Lawrence & Livingstone, 2008; DeCillia, 2018; Nossek, 2004). The categories were based on previous literature; in general, elite sources were considered to be governmental/military official, an expert or academic of the field and political parties. Non- elite sources were all other sources which were not elite. Again, the unit of data collection here was the article; each article was coded for each type of source, and the value was the number of sources that were present in the article (0 if there were none, 1 if there was one, etc.). The categories and ICR results for these variables ranged from .84 to .99, as seen in

Table 2.

20 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Table 2 Intercoder Reliability and sources Krippendorff’s Alpha n Dutch elite-sources .88 963 Other Western elite-sources .94 181 Afghan elite-sources .99 51 Other elite-sources .99 12 Dutch non-elite sources .84 412 Other Western non-elite sources .96 38 Afghan non-elite sources .99 24 Other non-elite sources .99 6 Note. ICR is calculated by Hayes macro for Krippendorff’s Alpha

Focus mission. To investigate whether newspapers covered the mission as a Dutch,

NATO or as another countries’ military mission, each of the frames assed above was additionally coded as to whether it was tied to a specifically Dutch mission, a NATO mission, and/or another country’s military mission. Frames could be tied to each of these options, as each was coded on a 0 = no, 1 = yes scale. ICR results ranged from .62 to 1.0, an overview can be found in Appendix III. Variables were deleted when the Alpha level was below .67.

Results

Sources

H1a stated that Dutch newspapers covering the military mission in

Afghanistan will rely more on elite sources than non-elite sources. As it was aimed to look at newspapers (independent variable) and if they used elite sources (dependent variable) or non- elite sources (dependent variable) more often, a MANOVA was used because the test allowed investigating the influence of one independent variable on two dependent variables. A

MANOVA revealed that there was no significant difference in the use of elite sources (M =

2.67, SD = 2.92) and non-elite sources (M = 1.11, SD = 2.20), F (2, 385) = 1.52, p = 0.220;

Wilk’s Λ = 0.99, η2= 0.008. However, it is interesting that the mean number of elite sources was 2.7 per article, versus 1.1 non-elite sources. In other words, more than 2.5 times as many

21 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME elite sources as non-elite sources were used in the sampled articles. The hypothesis is thus not supported, though the difference is in the expected direction.

H2a explored the patterns between papers, expecting that De Volkskrant used more elite sources to cover the military mission in Afghanistan than De Telegraaf. Therefore, an independent samples t-test was conducted to examine whether De Telegraaf or De Volkskrant used more elite sources to cover the conflict. The Levene's test for equality of variances was not significant F = 2.33, p = .128. Results revealed that De Volkskrant used slightly more elite sources (M = 2.80, SD = 3.10) than De Telegraaf (M = 2.54, SD = 2.74), t(386) = -0.92, p =

.358, 95% CI [-0.85, 0.31] d = 0.09, but again this difference was not significant. The hypothesis is therefore rejected.

Frames

To test if Dutch newspapers used positive frames more often to cover the mission than negative frames (hypothesis 1b), each frame was recoded to a scale of the total presence of the frames in the news (= total presence of frames). Variables of the subframes were recoded as 0 (not present) = 0 (not present), 1 (present and challenged) = 1 (present) and 2 (present and not challenged) = 1 (present). The frames were then summed into indices according to the conceptual clusters in the method section – meaning for example, that the five positive frames were summed up and divided by five so that each news article received an average score for the presence of positive frames. An overview of the mean scores can be found in

Appendix IV.

Then, a chi-square test was conducted. Results revealed that positive frames were present in 61.2% of the articles and there is a significant relationship between newspaper type and presence of positive frames X2 (1, N = 388) = 7.61, p = .006, τ = 0.02. In particular, De

Volkskrant used more positive frames than De Telegraaf, this is an unexpected finding.

Moreover, 38.7% of the newspapers included negative frames, and, contrary to expectations,

22 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

De Telegraaf used significantly more than De Volkskrant (X2 = (1, N = 388) = 5.75, p = .017,

τ = 0.02), an overview can be found in Table 3. Hereby, hypothesis 2b is rejected as De

Telegraaf used negative frames more often than De Volkskrant. It appears that, while both papers were, in general, more positive than negative framing the conflict, this difference was particularly pronounced in De Volkskrant; coverage in De Telegraaf was more balanced in terms of the valence of the frames.

Table 3 Total presence of frames De Telegraaf (n = 196) De Volkskrant (n = 192) Total (N = 388) Positive Frames 54.6% 68.2% 61.2% Negative Frames 45.4% 31.8% 38.7%

To test if De Telegraaf used personalisation more often than De Volkskrant

(hypothesis 2c), another independent samples t-test was conducted. The Levene’s test for equality of variances was significant F = 37.43, p = <.001, the results should be interpreted cautiously. Results revealed that De Telegraaf (M = 0.45, SD = 0.50) used indeed the personalisation frames more often than De Volkskrant (M = 0.29, SD = 0.45), t(383.81) = 3.46, p = .001, 95% CI [0.07, 0.26], d = 0.39. This was the largest difference, in terms of effect size, seen so far in the sample. So, the hypothesis is accepted.

For H2d it was examined to which the extent each newspaper challenged the positive frames. Again, the original variables were recoded but this time into a scale of challenged frames (= challenged frames). Variables of the subframes were recoded as 0 (not present) =

99 (missing), 1 (present and challenged) = 1 (present and challenged) and 2 (present and not challenged) = 0 (not present).1 The variables were only recoded for positive frames.

1 To test the ‘challenged frames’, only the subframes for positive frames were recoded because all other subframes could not be measured as ‘present and challenged’ (like Doubts and Personalisation) or it was not relevant to challenge the subframes (like Combat mission or Afghanistan is becoming less safe)

23 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Therefore, the higher the score on the 0-1 scale, the more challenging the article was to the positive frames. Overall, newspapers do not very often challenge the positive frames in their articles (N = 388, M = 0.39, SD = 0.49).

In order test if De Volkskrant or De Telegraaf challenged positive frames more often, another independent samples t-test was conducted. The Levene’s test for equality of variances was significant F = 12.96, p = <.001, so again the results should be interpreted with caution.

Results revealed that De Volkskrant (M = 0.44, SD = 0.50) indeed challenged the positive frames significantly more often than De Telegraaf (M = 0.34, SD = 0.48), t(384.35) = -1.94, p = 0.046, 95% CI [-0.19, -0.01], d = 0.20. Therefore, the hypothesis is accepted.

Differences over time

The last hypotheses focused on the difference in coverage over time. Hypothesis 3a stated that over time, newspapers were expected to use more non-elite sources than elite sources to cover the Dutch military mission in Afghanistan. Pearson’s correlation between the number of non-elite sources and years showed a very small non-significant relationship, r =

0.03, p = 0.624. In other words, newspapers did not significantly use non-elite sources more often over the years. Looking at differences per newspaper, there is no significant difference in the use of non-elite sources over time for De Telegraaf (r = -0.01, p = 0.132) and De

Volkskrant (r = 0.09, p = 0.222). See Figure 2 and 3 in Appendix V for an overview.

Another Pearson’s correlation was conducted to see if newspapers used negative frames more over time (hypothesis 3b) and if newspapers challenged positive frames more often over time (hypothesis 3c). Results revealed that there was no significant difference in the use of negative frames over time. Here, however, we see that this correlation masks a significant difference between papers: De Telegraaf used fewer negative frames over time, whereas, De Volkskrant remained steady in its coverage. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the use of challenged positive frames over time, see Table 4 for an

24 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME overview. So, newspapers did not significantly use negative frames more over time and did also not challenge positive frames more often. Therefore, the hypotheses are rejected, see

Figure 4 and 5 in Appendix V for an overview of the use of frames over time.

Table 4. Correlation use of frames over time De Telegraaf De Volkskrant Total (n = 196) (n = 192) (N = 388) r p r p r p Positive frames challenged over time 0.11 .131 0.02 .787 0.06 .213

Total presence negative frames over time -0.18 0.012 0.002 .981 -0.07 .381 Lastly, it was explored whether Dutch newspapers mentioned the military mission more explicitly as Dutch, NATO or in regards to another country. As shown in Table 5, Dutch newspapers very consistently tied each frame to the Dutch military mission specifically; in fewer articles was NATO mentioned in connection to these frames – similar to the mention of other countries.

Table 5 Frequency mentioning military mission in Afghanistan in connection to frames De Telegraaf De Volkskrant Total Dutch military mission (N = 368) 99.5% 91.1% 95.3% NATO military mission (N = 53) 7.2% 20.4% 13.8% Other country military mission (N = 54) 8.8% 19.4% 14.0%

Conclusion & Discussion

The overall purpose of this study was to investigate how Dutch newspapers reported about the mission in Afghanistan in terms of framing and sourcing. Hereby it was aimed to critically look at the democratic responsibilities of Dutch media in times of war. Overall,

Dutch newspapers tend to be positive about the military mission in Afghanistan and used elite sources more often than non-elite sources to cover the conflict. When looking at the differences per newspaper, De Telegraaf used personalisation and negative frames more often

25 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

– though the use of negative frames decreased over time in this news outlet. On the other hand, De Volkskrant used positive frames more often, but they also challenged the frames they used more frequently. In the following sections, the outstanding results of this study will be discussed.

First of all, Dutch newspapers use elite sources more often than non-elite sources when covering the military mission in Afghanistan, but this difference was not significant. This is surprising as previous studies found that news media tend to use elite sources more often in times of war (Bennett, 1990; Kothari, 2010; Nossek, 2004). The insignificant results could be explained by the fact that the sample size was too small, as only n = 192 articles were coded for De Volkskrant and n = 196 for De Telegraaf. A wider sample may have led to significant results. Nevertheless, even if there was not a significant difference, the high difference in the use of elite sources and non-elite sources illustrates a contrast which is worth mentioning. As the number of elite sources is relatively high in newspapers, they also have to power to influence the news frames in the frame-building process (Bennett, 1990; Brüggemann, 2014).

This is threatening because frames will become a powerful tool for elite sources because frames help the audience to understand and remember the conflict (De Vreese, 2005;

McCombs, 2013).

Secondly, results showed that positive frames were mostly used by newspapers to cover the mission. Furthermore, I did not find a decrease in the use of positive frames over time. The reason why Dutch newspapers seem to be elite-orientated and report in favour of their government could be explained by the concept of war journalism (Galtung & Fisher,

2013). In his study, Galtung (2005) argues that most news media are more war-orientated because they are reactive, focus on the visible effects of violence and focus only on the conflict area. Hereby, the focus too much on elites. Instead, he suggests that news media

26 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME should look at peace in general. News media should provide solutions to the public and expose untruths on all sides, so the public can make their own decisions.

Thirdly, differences per newspaper showed that De Telegraaf used personalisation as well as negative frames more often. The higher presence of negative frames in De Telegraaf could be explained by the political state of the Netherlands. From February 2007 till October

2010, the Dutch cabinet was formed by political parties CDA, CU and PvdA (Rijksoverheid, n.d.). In that time, Bert Koenders, member of the left orientated party PvdA, was responsible for the Ministry of Development Coordination. As De Telegraaf is known as a popular, right- leaning newspaper, it might be that they were more negative towards the actions of this minister, and therefore, use negative frames more often (Akkerman, 2011).

Lastly, when looking at how newspapers used frames to cover the conflict, De

Volkskrant tended to challenge positive frames more often than De Telegraaf. This is in line with previous research which suggests that quality newspapers try to be more balanced when reporting about conflict (Dimitrova & Strömbäck, 2008; Carpenter, 2007). This said it can be concluded that De Volkskrant tried to report the military mission in a balanced way as almost

50% of their news articles included a frame that also challenged that frame. Being a watchdog on elite and government by questioning and criticising them has always been seen as crucial to democracy (McNair, 2009). However, the findings of my study also show that this cannot be taken for granted. It has implications for the credibility of the media as well as for the public as the public cannot seek information themselves. Therefore, it is expected from the media that they search for information and strive to objectively report about the conflict

(Benyahia, Gardner, & Rayner, 2004).

Even though this study found some patterns, there are a couple of limitations. First, it should be mentioned that a few subframes did not score higher than .67 on the intercoder reliability tests. Therefore, several subframes were deleted and the cluster negative frame

27 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME should be interpreted with caution as it includes Afghanistan is becoming less safe frame which scored only .66.

Furthermore, the strength of a content analysis is that it counts the media output and it allows the researcher to investigate over time by looking at texts. However, one of the disadvantages is that it fails to explain why something got covered and why not (Neuendorf,

2002; Riffe, et al., 2014). Consequently, this study cannot indicate if journalists intended to challenge frames or not. Furthermore, since The Afghan Papers were revealed, it allows future studies to have a critical look at Dutch officials and the way they framed the mission and informed journalists, public and other governmental organisations. Did Dutch journalists know about the restraint of information by American officials? And did Dutch officials do the same? It would be interesting for future research to conduct a mixed-method study. By combining content analysis and interviews, a future study can examine if journalists are aware of their use of frames and possibly misleading information from officials. Moreover, the study can investigate if there are differences in frames presented in official documents about the mission and frames present in news media.

Moreover, when looking at the results, Dutch related content continued to appear quite substantial. To illustrate, media used a high number of Dutch elite sources and when they mentioned the military mission in Afghanistan, they mostly referred to this as the Dutch military mission. This is noteworthy because both missions were an international partnership between different NATO Allies and partners. By focusing on Dutch related content, news media try to present distant events as relevant to their audience, which is called domestication

(Taradai, 2014). Moreover, domestic stories are constructed in a way that they are reconcilable with the culture and dominant ideology of the foreign country (Gurevitch, Levy,

& Roeh, 1991). Hereby, journalists’ standards shift from being objective to being subjective

(Tumber & Prentoulis, 2003). This type of coverage can have implications for how Dutch

28 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME citizens received messages. For example, people may have felt like they understood the war in

Afghanistan, but because of the presented picture of reality by media, they only got information on a few aspects of reality. This has not only implications for their own knowledge, but also on their decision-making about the military actions and government.

Therefore, it is suggested for future research to further investigate the role of domestication in

Dutch news media when covering the military mission in Afghanistan.

To conclude, this study showed that journalism in times of conflict is facing difficulties and the democratic responsibility of the press cannot be taken for granted. Due to different circumstances, media are struggling with their use of frames and sources when covering the military mission in Afghanistan. Not only are they mostly supportive of the mission, but they also do not offer a platform for multiple opinions. As Nord & Strömbäck (2006) stated:

“International conflicts of our time are usually not only a battle of weapons but also a battle of opinions” (p.1). It is, therefore, the duty of the media to be transparent and inform the public the best way possible. Media do not have the power to win the war in Afghanistan, but the media do have the power to win this battle of opinions. By acknowledging that they rely more often on elite sources and positive frames, this is a first step in changing media coverage during wartime. Distance should not be a boundary, but an opportunity. Performing journalism in times of conflict should trigger journalists to perform according to their democratic standards and be eager to find the truth. It is time that news media take their responsibility and turn into a watchdog again.

29 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

References

Aarts, K., & Semetko, H. A. (2003). The divided electorate: Media use and political

involvement. Journal of Politics, 65(3), 759-784. doi:10.1111/468-2508.00221

Akkerman, T. (2011). Friend or foe? Right-wing populism and the popular and the popular

press in Britain and the Netherlands. Journalism, 12(8), 931-945.

doi:10.1177/1464884911415972

Al-Ghazzi, O. (2014). Citizen journalism in the Syrian uprising: Problematizing western

narratives in a local context. Communication Theory, 24(1), 435-454.

doi:10.1111/comt.12047

Allan, S. (2013). Citizens witnessing: Revisioning journalism in times of crisis. Cambridge,

United Kingdom: Policy Press.

Allan, S., & Zelizer, B. (2004). Reporting war: Journalism in wartime. London, United

Kingdom: Routledge.

Alonso, S., & Kranenburg, M. (December 10, 2019). Haagsongemak over missie in

Afghanistan. NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved at January 15, 2019 from

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2019/12/10/haags-ongemak-over-missie-in-afghanistan-

a3983360

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of

nationalism. London, United Kingdom: Verso.

Arif, R., Golan, G. J., & Moritz, B. (2014). Mediated public diplomacy: US and Taliban

relations with Pakistani media. Media, War & Conflict, 7(2), 201-217.

doi:10.1177/1750635214538619

Baden, C., & Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2018). The search for common ground in conflict

news research: Comparing the coverage of six current conflicts in domestic and

30 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

international media over time. Media, War & Conflict, 11(1), 22-45.

doi:10.1177/1750635217702071

Bakker, P., & Scholten, O. (2011). Communicatiekaart van Nederland: Overzicht van media

en communicatie (ed.8). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

BBC News. (September 8, 2019). Why is there a war in Afghanistan? The short, medium and

long story. BBC News Asia. Retrieved at November 1, 2019 from

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49192495

Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal

of Communication, 40(2), 103-127. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990tb02265.x

Bennett, W. L., Lawrence, R. G., & Livingston, S. (2008). When the press fails: Political

power and the news media from Iraq to Karina. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago

Press.

Benyahia, S. C., Gardner, A., & Rayner, P. (2004). Media studies: The essential resource.

London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Boukes, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). A general pattern in the construction of economic

newsworthiness? Analyzing news factors in popular, quality, regional, and financial

newspapers. Journalism, 21(2), 1-22. doi:10.1177/1464884917725989

Boumans, J. W., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Vliegenthart, R. (2013). Media personalisation in

context: A cross-national comparison between the UK and the Netherlands, 1992-

2007. Political Studies, 61(1), 198-216. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12013

Bowman, S., & Willis, C. (2003). We media: How audiences are shaping the future of news

and information. New York, NY: Media Centre.

Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2010). Studying the effects of issue framing on public opinion

about policy issues: Does what we see depend on how we look? In P. D’Angelo

31 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

(Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 159-

186). New York, NY: Routledge.

Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between frame setting and frame sending: How journalists

contribute to news frames. Communication Theory, 24(1), 61-82.

doi:10.1111/comt.12027

Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know

it… and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7-23.

doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811

Carpenter, S. (2007). U.S. Elite and non-elite newspapers’ portrayal of the Iraq War: A

comparison of frames and source use. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly,

84(4), 761-776. doi:10.1177/107769900708400407

Cooper, S.D., & Kuypers, J.A. (2004). Embedded versus behind-the-lines reporting on the

2003 Iraq War. In R. Berenger (Eds.), Global media go to war (pp. 161-172).

Spokane, WA: Marquette Books.

Cozma, R. (2014). Were the Murrow boy warmongers? The relationship between sourcing,

framing, and propaganda in war journalism. Journalism Studies, 16(3), 433-448.

doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.882098

Cozma, R., & Kozman, C. (2015). The Syrian crisis in the news. Journalism Practice, 9(5),

669-686. doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.982940

De Brouwer, S. (May 12, 2013). Extreem leven. Hilversum, the Netherlands: VPRO.

Retrieved at December 30, 2019 from

https://www.vpro.nl/speel~VPWON_1196295~standplaats-afghanistan-extreem-

leven~.html

32 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

De Graaf, B., & Dimitriu, G. (2016). Fighting the war at home: Strategic narratives, elite

responsiveness, and the Dutch mission in Afghanistan, 2006-2010. Foreign Policy

Analysis, 12(1), 2-23. doi:10.1111/fpa.12070\

De Swert, K. (2012). Calculating inter-coder reliability in media content analysing using

Krippendorff’s Alpha. University of Amsterdam. Retrieved at January 22, 2020 from

https://www.polcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/ICR01022012.pdf

De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal,

13(1), 51-62. doi:10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre

DeCillia, B. (2018). But is it not getting any safer!: The contested dynamic of framing

Canada’s military mission in Afghanistan. Canadian Journal of Political Science,

51(1), 155-177. doi:10.1017/S0008423917000634

Dimitrova, D. V., & Strömbäck, J. (2005). Mission accomplished? Framing the Iraq war in

elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. International Communication

Gazette, 67(5), 399-417. doi:10.1177/0016549205056050

Dimitrova, D. V., & Strömbäck, J. (2008). Foreign policy and framing of the 2003 Iraq war in

elite Swedish and American newspapers. Media, War & Conflict, 1(2), 203-220.

doi:10.1177/1750635208090957

Entman, R. (1993). Framing – Towards a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of

Communication, 43, 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Entman, R.M., & Page, B.I. (1994). The news before the storm: The Iraq war debate and the

limits of media independence. In T. Mayer (Eds.), The Gulf War, the media, and U.S.

foreign policy (pp. 82-101). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Galtung, J. (July 8, 2005). The missing journalism on conflict and peace in the middle east.

Retrieved at January 25, 2020 from https://www.transcend.org/files/article570.html

33 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Galtung, J., & Fisher, D. (2013). John Galtung: Pioneer of peach journalism. Berlin,

Germany: Springer.

Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear

power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(11), 1-37.

Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: Story suitability. Society, 16(3), 65-77.

doi:10.1007/BF02701600

Gans, H. J. (1998). What can journalists actually do for American democracy? International

Journal of Press/Politics, 3(4), 6-12. doi:10.1177/1081180X98003004003

Gonen, Y. (2018). Journalist-sources relationship in violent conflict coverage: Shifting

dynamics. Sociology Compass, 12(7), 1-13. doi:10.1111/soc4.12595

Gurevitch, M., Levy, M. R., & Roeh, I. (1991). The global newsroom: Convergences and

diversities in the globalization of television news. In P., Dahlgren (Eds.).

Communication and citizenship (pp. 195-216). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Hallin, D. C. (1986). The “uncensored war”. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hänggli, R. (2012). Key factors in frame building: How strategic political actors shape news

media coverage. American Behavioural Scientist, 56(3), 300-317.

doi:10.1177/0002764211426327

Hansen, A.K. (1991). Source diversity and newspaper enterprise journalism. Journalism

Studies, 11(5), 630-633. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2010.502787

Hayes, A.F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure

for coding data. Communication Method and Measures, 1, 77-89.

doi:10.1080/19312450709336664

Hermida, A., Lewis, S.C., & Zamith, R. (2014). Sourcing the Arab Spring: A case study of

Andy Carvin’s sources on Twitter during Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions. Journal

of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 479-499.

34 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Het Parool. (April 20, 2007). Soldaat gedood in Afghanistan. Het Parool. Retrieved at

January 27, 2020 from https://www.parool.nl/nieuws/soldaat-gedood-in-

afghanistan~b28ac8ed/

Kenix, L. J. (2015). You are either with us or with us: Constructing a Samoan national

identity through inclusion at the Samoa Observer. Journalism, 16(4), 553-570.

doi:10.1177/1464884914525557

King, J. M., & Zayani, M. (2008). Media, branding and controversy: Perceptions of Al-

Jazeera in newspapers around the world. Journal of Middle East Media, 1(4), 27-43.

Kothari, A. (2010). The framing of the Darfur conflict in the New York Times: 2003-2006.

Journalism Studies, 11(2), 209-224. doi:10.1080/14616700903481978

Kristensen, N. N., & Ørsten, M. (2007). Danish media at war: The Danish media coverage of

the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Journalism, 8(3), 323-343.

doi:10.101177/1464884907076458

Landert, D. (2014). Personalisation in mass media communication: British online news

between public and private. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing

Company.

Lecheler, S., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects.

Journal of Communication, 61(5), 959-983. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.01580.x

McCombs, M. (2013). Setting the Agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge,

United Kingdom: Polity Press.

McNair, B. (2009). Journalism and Democracy. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch. (Eds.).

The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 237-249). New York, NY: Routledge.

Mediamonitor. (n.d.). Dagbladen in 2018. Retrieved at December 17, 2019 from

https://www.mediamonitor.nl/mediamarkten/dagbladen/dagbladen-in-2018/

35 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. (October 24, 2019). Nederland ondersteunt Afghanistan.

Retrieved at November 1, 2019 from

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/internationale-vrede-en-

veiligheid/nederland-ondersteunt-afghanistan

Ministerie van Defensie. (n.d.). Missie in Afghanistan. Defensie. Retrieved at November 1,

2019 from https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/missie-in-afghanistan

Mythen, G. (2010). Reframing risk? Citizens journalism and the transformation of news.

Journal of Risk Research, 13(1), 45-58. doi:10.1080/13669870903136159

NATO. (January 14, 2020). NATO and Afghanistan. Retrieved at January 27, 2020 from

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_8189.htm

Neuendorf, K.A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage

Publications.

Nord, L. W. (2007). Investigative journalism in Sweden: A not so noticeable noble effort.

Journalism, 8(5), 517-521. doi:10.1177/1464884907081045

Nord, L. W., & Strömbäck, J. (2006). Reporting more, informing less: A comparison of

Swedish media coverage of September 11 and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Journalism, 7(1), 85-110. doi:10.1177/1464884906059429

Nossek, H. (2004). Our news and their news. The role of national identity in the coverage of

foreign news. Journalism, 5(3), 343-368. doi:10.1177/1464884904044941

Nu.nl. (February 21, 2010). Reconstructie val van kabinet Balkenende IV. Retrieved at

January 28, 2020 from https://www.nu.nl/politiek/2189534/reconstructie-val-kabinet-

balkenende-iv.html

Nygren, G., Glowacki, M., Hök J., Kiria, I., Orlova, D., & Taradai, D. (2018). Journalism in

crossfire. Journalism Studies, 19(7), 1059-1078.

36 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Onze missie in Afghanistan. (n.d.). Missie in Afghanistan kostte tenminste 2,5 miljard.

BNN/VARA. Retrieved January 15, 2020 from

https://missieafghanistan.bnnvara.nl/alleberichten/2016/11/24/missie-afghanistan-

kostte-ten-minste-25-miljard

Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S.D.

Reese (Eds.), Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of

the Social world (pp. 35-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Philo, G., & Berry, M. (2004). Bad news from Israel. London, United Kingdom: Pluto Press.

Reese, S. D. (1991). Setting the media’s agenda: A power balance perspective. Annals of

International Communication Association, 14(1), 309-340.

doi:10.1080/23808985.1991.11678793

Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2014). Analyzing media messages, Using quantitative content

analysis research. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F., & Watson, B. (2019). Analyzing media messages. Using

quantitative content analysis in research (4rd ed.) New York, NY: Routledge.

Rijksoverheid. (2014). Eindevaluatie geïntegreerde politiemissie. Retrieved at January 25,

2020 from

https://www.tweedekamer.nl/debat_en_vergadering/commissievergaderingen/details?i

d=2014A00975

Rijksoverheid. (n.d.). Kabinetten sinds 1945. Retrieved at January 29, 2020 from

https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/regering/over-de-regering/kabinetten-sinds-1945

Robinson, P. (2004). Researching US media-state relations in twenty-first century wars. In S.

Allan (Eds.). Reporting War: Journalism in wartime. (pp. 96-112). London, United

Kingdom: Routledge.

37 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Rowling, C. M., Sheets, P., & Jones, T. M. (2015). American atrocity revisited: National

identity, cascading frames, and the My Lai massacre. Political Communication, 32,

310-330. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.

Schoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on

mass media content. New York, NY: Longman.

Seib, P. M. (2002). The global journalists: news and conscience in a world of conflict. New

York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Sosale, S. (2010). Rallying around the flag: Journalistic constructions of a national

mediascape in a global era. The International Communication Gazette, 72(3), 211-

227. doi:10.1177/1748048509356948

Taradai, D. (2014). How news domestication may blur conflict: Coverage of the 2008 South

Ossetia War in Ukraine. Central European Journal of Communication, 7(12), 67-81.

Taylor, P.M. (2003). Journalism under fire. In S. Cottle (Eds.), News, public relations and

power (pp. 63-79). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

Trouw. (March 8, 2013). Missie in Kunduz stopt deze zomer, F16’s blijven langer. Retrieved

at November 1, 2019 from https://www.trouw.nl/nieuws/missie-in-kunduz-stopt-deze-

zomer-f16-s-blijven-langer~b07777fd/\

Tumber, H., & Prentoulis, M. (2003). ‘Journalists under fire: Objectivity and emotional

literacy’, in D. Thussu & D. Freedman (Eds.) War and the media: Reporting conflict

24/7 (pp. 215-230). London, United Kingdom: Sage.

Van Bommel, H. (November 1, 2012). ‘Onze missie in Afghanistan is mislukt. De

Volkskrant. Retrieved at January 20, 2020 from https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-

achtergrond/onze-missie-in-afghanistan-is-mislukt~bced63bd/

38 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Van der Lijn, J. (2015). Comprehensive approaches, diverse coherences: The different levels

of policy coherence in the Dutch 3D approach in Afghanistan. Small Wars &

Insurgencies, 26(1), 72-89. doi:10.1080/09592318.2014.959773

Van der Lijn, J., & Van der Berg, P. (2011). 3D ‘The next generation’: Lessons learned from

Uruzgan for future operations. Netherlands Institute of International Relations

Clingendael. The Netherlands: The Hague.

Van der Meulen, J., & Vos, A. (2012). Uruzgan: het politieke gewicht van draagvlak.

Retrieved at January 15, 2020 from

https://www.atlcom.nl/upload/Artikel_Van_der_Meulen___Vos_AP_2012_nr__7.pdf

Veteraneninstituut. (October 2, 2014). Afghanistan. Retrieved at November 1, 2019 from

https://www.veteraneninstituut.nl/missie/afghanistan/

Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Hanitzsch, T. (2019). The handbook of Journalism Studies (2nd ed.).

New York, NY: Routledge.

Walter, A.S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2010). Negative campaigning across different

communication channels: Different ball games? International Journal of Press

Politics, 15(4), 441-461. doi:10.1177/1940161210374122

Weaver, D. H., & Willnat, L. (2012). The global journalist in the 21st century. New York:

Routledge.

Whitlock, C. (December 9, 2019). The Afghanistan papers: A secret history of the war. The

Washington Post. Retrieved at December 24, 2019 from

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/investigations/afghanistan-

papers/afghanistan-war-confidential-documents/

Woods, A. (February 17, 2007). To sell Canada on war, try hope but not liberty: Focus

groups advised Harper not to echo Bush. The Star. Retrieved at November 11, 2019

from

39 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

https://www.thestar.com/news/2007/02/17/to_sell_canada_on_war_try_hope_but_not

_liberty.html

Zandberg, E., & Neiger, M. (2005). Between the nation and the profession: Journalists as

members of contradicting communities. Media, Culture & Society, 27(1), 131-141.

doi:10.1177/0163443705049073

40 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Appendix

Appendix I – Overview total number of news articles per newspaper

Total articles of number

Figure 1. Distribution of Dutch newspaper articles from 2006-2013.

41 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Appendix II – Codebook

Final Codebook: Dutch military mission in Afghanistan.

General coder instructions

1. Please read the whole article before you start coding.

2. The focus of this content analysis is on the headline and body of the article. Therefore,

codes offered refer to these two content parts of the article (unit of data collection).

3. Please read the instructions and examples provided in the codebook carefully.

Part 1: The first part of the codebook indicates the administrative variables which need to be coded to make the study more consistent.

I – Administrative Variables

1. News Story

Each news article will be assigned a unique number which should be entered here. The number occurs in the top right of the page when opening the article via the downloaded

NexisUni file. The number is assigned to the article based on the occurrence in the results list.

2. Coder

Please indicate the number belonging to the coder.

1. Naomi Horstkamp

2. Other

3. Newspaper

The newspaper from which the article derived.

1. De Telegraaf

2. De Volkskrant

42 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

4. Publication date

Indicate the publishing date of the news article after you downloaded it from NexisUni:

DD/MM/YYYY.

5. Headline

The title of the news article, this can simply be copy-paste from NexisUni.

6. Section

The section from which the news article is derived. The section occurs above the body of the news article when opening the news article in NexisUni. If possible, write down the section as mentioned in NexisUni. If no section is mentioned or when it is unclear, enter “99”.

7. Word count

The number of words mentioned by NexisUni. The length of the article occurs above the body of the news article when opening the news article in NexisUni.

Part 2: The second part of the codebook focuses on the framing of the military mission by journalists. The focus of the coding is on how the military operation is covered in the news article.

II – Overall tone of voice of the article

8. Tone of voice

1 = Strongly negative

2 = Negative

3 = Neutral

4 = Positive

5 = Strongly positive

Read through the article first, without worrying about any of the subsequent codes. After reading the article this first time, please indicate the overall tone of voice of the article. If you

43 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME think the news article’s tone is very critical or negative about the military mission (The

Netherlands, NATO or other country) in Afghanistan, please code ‘strongly negative’. If you think the article is very supporting or positive about the mission, please code ‘strongly positive’. When the article is not very positive or supportive, but also not very negative or critical about the mission, please code ‘neutral’. Please code the tone of voice of the article when article mentions Dutch military mission specifically, mentions NATO mission specifically, Dutch military mission in relation to NATO or Dutch military mission in relation to missions from other countries.

III – Positive frames (DeCillia, 2018; Van der Lijn & Van der Berg, 2011; Van der Lijn,

2015)

9. Reconstruction

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ when the article emphasizes the effort of the military (the Netherlands,

NATO or other country) to improve Afghan living conditions or self-governance. The military mission is described as (aiming to or successful at) on restoring democracy and improving living conditions for Afghan citizens. Please code for (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when article focuses on reconstruction, but this is challenged in some way within the news article. To illustrate, when article mentions that the military mission aimed to restore democracy, but also shows numbers which illustrate that this is hard to achieve. Or if one quote suggests this is an aim (or the aim) of the mission, but another suggests it’s something else. Please code (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when news article mentions that the mission focuses on reconstruction only. To illustrate, when article mentions aim is to

44 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME restore democracy in Afghanistan and shows numbers supporting this or when the article mentions rebuilding democracy in Afghanistan and aiming for a better future. Code (0) ‘not present’ when the article only mentions that the strength of the mission is related to decrease of violence (see code 25) against the Taliban or when the article only mentions that the mission leads to stronger policemen (see code 13) or when no characterization of the aim of the mission is present.

Example: Nederland zet zich meer in op het focussen van effecten van de operatie op

de bevolking van Afghanistan binnen de NAVO.

Example: Er is veel gebeurd, maar we moeten niet vergeten waarom wij in

Afghanistan zijn, namelijk voor de wederopbouw van het land en een betere toekomst

voor de bevolking. Focus van de missie moet liggen op wederopbouw, niet op vechten.

If coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ or (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’, please continue. If coded (0) not present, please go to 13.

10. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the reconstruction frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions the military mission with regards to the Netherlands or Dutch effort. To illustrate, is code ‘Yes’ when article states that Dutch military mission leads to greater democracy in Afghanistan or when Dutch contribution to

NATO led to greater democracy in Afghanistan.

11. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the reconstruction frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

45 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article mentions the NATO mission with regards to reconstruction.

To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that NATO mission leads to greater democracy in Afghanistan.

12. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the

reconstruction frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions other countries such as America, Canada or Iraq with regards to reconstruction without mentioning NATO. If NATO is mentioned, please code ‘Yes’ for code 11. To illustrate, America’s contribution leads to greater democracy in

Afghanistan.

13. Mentoring

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ if the article mentions the mission (the Netherlands, NATO or other country) with regards to improving, helping out or strengthening Afghan official and governmental institutions by the use of training and mentoring. This can be related to the military improving the strength of Afghan police by the use of military training, or military helping local government to govern by providing mentoring or training sessions. But also, when article mentions that the use of training/mentoring would improve the strength of

Afghan police or other governmental institutions. To illustrate, code ‘present’ when the article explicitly mentions the help of military to improve Afghan institutions related to police units, security forces, government bodies, etc. Is coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when

46 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME article focuses on mentoring but also challenges this in the same article. To illustrate, when article mentions the mentoring approach of military to train Afghan police, but also quotes leader of an Afghan police centre stating that the Afghan police is not becoming stronger since arrival of military in Afghanistan. Is coded (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when article mentions mentoring and does not challenge it. To illustrate, when article mentions the mentoring approach to train Afghan policemen and use numbers to support this or the military are in Afghanistan to strength the Afghan army.

Example: De kamer promoot de missie door te focussen op het trainen van

politieagenten, waar geen militaire taken worden uitgevoerd.

Example: Nederland is in Afghanistan om het Afghaanse leger te versterken door het

geven van speciale professionele trainingen.

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, please go to 17.

14. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the mentoring frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions mentoring and military mission with regards to the Netherlands or Dutch effort. To illustrate, is coded ‘Yes’ when article states that Dutch military mission strengths Afghan police by training them or when it states that

Dutch contribution to NATO mission leads to stronger Afghan policemen.

15. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the mentoring frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

47 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article mentions the NATO mission with regards to mentoring. To illustrate, is coded ‘Yes’ when article mentions that NATO mission strengths Afghan police by training them.

16. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the mentoring

frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions other countries such as America, Canada or Iraq etc. with regards to mentoring without mentioning NATO. When article mentions NATO, please code ‘Yes’ for code 15. To illustrate, because American military is training Afghan policemen, they become stronger.

17. Diplomacy

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ when the article explicitly recounts events or details that show that respect or dialogue from military (the Netherlands, NATO or other country) leads to solving problems in Afghanistan. This relates to different levels of dialogue, such as diplomatic relations, communication with citizens, consolations, winning hearts and minds of the people, winning confidence, etc. To illustrate, it is coded ‘present’ when the article mentions that because of the military approach focusing on dialogue, the relationship between military and

Afghan citizens became stronger. Is coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when article focuses on diplomacy but also challenges this in the same article. To illustrate, when article mentions that because of dialogue, the relationship between military and Afghan citizens

48 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME becomes stronger, but also mentions that this is not always the case by providing an example.

Is coded (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when article mentions diplomacy and does not challenge this. To illustrate, when article mentions that dialogue leads to greater relationship between Afghan citizens and military by using a quote from an Afghan citizen.

Example: Door goed contact met de bevolking, hebben we een grote wapenopslag

kunnen vinden.

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, please go to 21.

18. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the diplomacy frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions diplomacy and military mission with regards to the Netherlands or Dutch effort or Dutch contribution to NATO mission. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article states that Dutch military have a good relationship with citizens and wherefore several problems where fixed.

19. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the diplomacy frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article mentions the NATO mission with regards to diplomacy. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that NATO mission solves problems because of good relationship with citizens.

49 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

20. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the diplomacy

frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions other countries such as America, Canada or Iraq etc. with regards to diplomacy without mentioning NATO. If NATO is mentioned, please code

‘Yes’ for code 19. To illustrate, when news article stresses the strength of Australian army by their dialogue approach.

21. International Status

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ when the article stresses that the operation in Afghanistan is important for the international status (the Netherlands, NATO or other country). This can be related to the credibility, international cooperation, military strength, international reputation etc. The international status can be questioned, but also praised in the article. To illustrate, when article mentions that if the Netherlands does not join the military operation in Afghanistan, this will be bad for their reputation. Please code for (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when article focuses on the international status but this is challenged within the news article.

To illustrate, when article mentions that Dutch international status will be stronger when joining the (NATO) military mission, but also states that there is a chance that soldiers will die or when article mentions that the international status will decrease if Dutch do not join military operation. Please code (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when news article

50 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME mentions the importance of the international status. To illustrate, when article mentions that joining NATO mission is good for the credibility of the Dutch army.

Example: Als Nederland niet meedoet met deze gezamenlijke missie, kan dat slechte

gevolgen hebben voor de internationale reputatie.

Example: Als Nederland niet mee doet met deze gezamenlijke missie gaan andere

landen twijfelen over Nederland wel NAVO waardig is.

If coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ or (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’, please continue. If coded (0) not present, please go to 25.

22. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the international status frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions the military mission with regards to the international status of the Netherlands. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article states that

Dutch military mission leads to a better international status in NATO or when Dutch international status is taken into consideration.

23. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the international status frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article mentions that the military mission is good for the international status of NATO. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions a successful military mission will lead to a greater reputation of NATO. Do not code ‘1’ when Netherlands questions if contribution leads to better status at NATO (Yes for code 22) or when NATO doubts about the status of the Netherlands (Yes for code 22).

51 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

24. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the

international status frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions other countries such as America, Canada and their international status. Also, code present when NATO has doubts about the international status from other countries than the Netherlands. If the international status of NATO is mentioned, please code ‘Yes’ for code 23. To illustrate, when article mentions that International status of

America taken into consideration after attack on Afghan citizens. Do not code present when

America is critical to the Netherlands, because they are still in doubt about their contribution to the Afghan invasion (Code ‘Yes’ for 22).

25. . Decrease of violence

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ when the article mentions that the military mission (Dutch, NATO or other country) led to less violence or lower terror attacks in Afghanistan. Also coded ‘present’ when the article mentions that the rise of the Taliban and al-Qaeda was limited because of military effort. Is coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when article focuses on decrease of violence but also challenges this in the same article. To illustrate, when article mentions there is a decrease of violence since the military started the invasion in Afghanistan but also shows numbers which stresses that the military used violence during mission. Is coded (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when article mentions the decrease of

52 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME violence and does not challenge it. To illustrate, when article mentions that Afghanistan is facing lower terror attacks since military invasion and use numbers to support this.

Example: Veiligheid in de provincie Uruzgan is toegenomen sinds de komst van

Nederlandse troepen.

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, go to 29.

26. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the decrease of violence frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions decrease of violence because of

Netherlands or Dutch military mission or Dutch contribution to NATO mission. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article states that since Dutch military are active in Afghanistan, the number of terror attacks decreased.

27. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the decrease of violence frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article mentions the NATO mission led to less violence. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that NATO mission leads to a lower number of terror attacks in Afghanistan.

28. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the decrease of

violence frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

53 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions other countries such as America, Canada or Iraq etc. with regards to decrease of violence without mentioning NATO. To illustrate, since Australia is present in Afghanistan, the number of terror attacks decreased. If NATO is mentioned please code ‘Yes’ for code 27.

IV – Personalisation frames (DeCillia, 2018)

29. Brave soldiers

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ when the article mentions that soldiers made a noble effort, the mission was noble or stresses that soldiers are brave or strong. Also coded ‘present’ when the article mentions the strength of soldiers because they turned out to be great professionals which cannot be missed or when it stresses their effort. Also, when article mentions that public finds soldiers brave or have sympathy for the military or soldiers. For example, is coded ‘present’ when a news article mentions that a soldier is wounded after the brave rescue of prisoned

Afghan policemen. Is coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when article focuses on brave soldiers, but also challenges this in the same article. To illustrate, when article mentions that soldiers are indispensable in Afghanistan but also states the country is self-supporting. Is coded (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when article mentions brave soldiers and does not challenge it. To illustrate, when article mentions that military are great professionals and could not be missed.

Example: Nederlandse militair gewond geraakt na bermbom bij moedige poging om

burgers te redden.

54 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Example: Volgens kolonel Kruize heeft de Nederlandse taskforce zich volledig

waargemaakt en is daardoor bijna onmisbaar geworden.

Example: Wij steunen onze soldaten door dik en dun, zij zetten zich in voor ons land.

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, go to 33.

30. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the brave soldiers frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions the Netherlands or the Dutch military mission and/or soldiers made a noble effort or were brave. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that Dutch military are strong.

31. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the brave soldiers frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article mentions NATO in relation to making a noble effort or brave soldiers. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that soldiers who are working for

NATO in Afghanistan are brave.

32. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the brave

soldiers frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions other countries such as America, Canada or Iraq etc. with regards to making a noble effort/being brave soldiers without mentioning the NATO. To

55 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME illustrate, when news article states that 19 army heroes from America received a medal. If

NATO is mentioned, please code ‘Yes’ for code 31.

33. Personalisation

0 = not present

1 = present

Is coded (1) ‘present’ when the article is focusing on personalisation of the military mission

(The Netherlands, NATO or other country). This can be done by giving a human voice to a story by addressing personal stories, or giving names to stories, or focusing on activities within the mission which are not related to the aim of the mission such as what type of games were played by soldiers, what kind of people visited the military camps or by talking to family etc. To illustrate, when article is talking to family members about the impact of mission for them, but also stresses that we need the soldiers to be part of the Dutch military.

Example: Kim Kötter is afgereisd naar Afghanistan om de mannen te vermaken.

Example: Het militair ziekenhuis heeft de 2000ste patiënt geopereerd.

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, go to 37.

34. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the personalisation frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions personalisation in relation to the

Dutch military mission. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that Dutch military hospital has already operated 2000 patients.

35. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the personalisation frame?

56 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article mentions NATO and personalisation. To illustrate, is coded

‘1’ when article interviews family members of several NATO military.

36. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the

personalisation frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article is focusing on personalisation of America, Canada or Iraq etc., but without mentioning NATO. If NATO is mentioned please code ‘Yes’ for code 35. To illustrate, when article mentions the activities Canadian military do besides their military operation, code ‘Yes’ for code 36.

V – Negative frames

37. Doubts

0 = not present

1 = present

Is coded (1) ‘present’ when the article mentions doubts about the mission (the Netherlands,

NATO or other country) in Afghanistan and its aim or its success in general. This can be related to doubts about the aim or contribution to the mission or certain actions of militaries are taken into consideration. This can be for several reasons such as money or safety, relevance for the Netherlands or doubts about the mission because of (possible) wounded or dead soldiers or events from the past. To illustrate, code ‘present’ when the article mentions uncertainties about the interpretation of the mission in relation to military tasks or if the mission should, therefore, be supported or not. Also coded ‘present’ when the article mentions

57 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME that political parties are not sure if they want to support the mission because of unclarities about the mission such as the aim or the interpretation of the mission or when political parties disagree about contribution to the mission. it. Also coded present when support for mission is decreasing, which can be in public or politics.

Example: Nederlandse regering heeft aangegeven dat zij in totaal 42 scholen willen

bouwen, maar het is de vraag of dit gaat lukken aangezien er maar een klein budget is

vrijgekomen voor innovatie.

Example: PvdA twijfelt over instemmen met nieuwe missie omdat het doel van de

missie nog niet duidelijk is.

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, go to 41.

38. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the doubts frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions doubts about the Dutch military mission. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions political parties are doubting about extending the mission.

39. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the doubts frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article mentions NATO and doubts about the mission. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that important political figures are doubting about the success of the NATO mission or NATO is doubting about Dutch contribution to mission.

58 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

40. Another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the doubts

frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions doubts about mission and other countries such as

America, Canada or Iraq etc. To illustrate, when article mentions that America has doubts about the Dutch contribution in the NATO mission. Do not code present when NATO has doubts about Dutch military contribution, please code ‘Yes’ for code 39.

41. The downfall of the mission

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ when the article mentions the mission (the Netherlands, NATO or other country) in Afghanistan failed, was a flop, fell short, or things went wrong because of wrongdoings and/or missteps from official and governmental institutions or soldiers themselves. This can also relate to the fact that military do not work together with other

NATO military troops. But also, when government did not listen to the Dutch military. To illustrate, when news article mentions that promises were not kept and as a result, things went wrong. Also coded ‘present’ when the article mentions that the Dutch approach was not successful. Is coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when article focuses on the downfall of the mission but also challenges this in the same article. To illustrate, when article suggests that the military mission in Afghanistan was a flop, but also mentions examples of schools that are built because of the mission. Is coded (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when article mentions the downfall of the mission. To illustrate, when article

59 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME mentions that mission in Afghanistan was a flop and illustrates this with examples from the field.

Example: Nederlandse missie in Afghanistan is mislukt door het falen van de regering.

Zij durfde niet in te zetten op goede coördinatie tussen landen en er was geen sprake

van een gezamenlijke aanpak.

Example: Een Afghaanse tolk geeft aan dat de Nederlandse militaire een passieve

houding hebben. ‘Zij springen in hun wagen als er een gevecht begint. Ze zeggen dan:

Wij komen hier om vrede te bewaren, niet om te vechten. Waarop ik antwoordde: Als

je geen gevecht aangaat, kan je ook geen vrede bewaren in Afghanistan.’

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, go to 45.

42. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the downfall of the mission frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly mentions the downfall of the Dutch military mission in Afghanistan. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that Dutch military mission failed because of missteps from officials.

43. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the downfall of the mission frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article explicitly mentions the downfall of the NATO mission. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions NATO mission failed because countries did not work together.

60 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

44. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the downfall of

the mission frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions the downfall of the mission of other countries such as America, Canada etc., but without mentioning NATO. If NATO is mentioned, please code

‘1’ for code 43. To illustrate, when article mentions that military mission in Afghanistan failed because of wrongdoing American army.

45. Afghanistan is becoming less safe

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ when the article mentions that risk increases since the military (the

Netherlands, NATO or other country) joined the operations. In other words, mission aims to make Afghanistan safer, but instead, since the military troops arrived in Afghanistan, the country became less safe. This can be related to both, military groups but also (Afghan) citizens. Also, code present when article mentions civilian or military deaths in Afghanistan.

Is coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when article stresses that Afghanistan became less safe since military invasion but also challenges this in the same article. To illustrate, when article suggests that since the arrival of military troops the country became less safe, but also mentions some places have become safer. Is coded (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when article mentions that Afghanistan is less safe since the military invasion. To illustrate, when article mentions states that Afghanistan was safer before military troops entered the country.

61 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Example: Veiligheid in de provincie Uruzgan is afgenomen sinds de komst van

Nederlandse troepen.

Example: Missie moet langer doorgaan omdat het minder goed gaat dan gepland, het

is de afgelopen jaren alleen maar onveiliger geworden.

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, go to 49.

46. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the Afghanistan is becoming less safe frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly states that Afghanistan became less safe since arrival Dutch military. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that Afghanistan became less safe since the Netherlands arrived in the country.

47. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the Afghanistan is becoming less

safe frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article explicitly mentions that Afghanistan became less safe since the NATO mission. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article states that since the arrival of

NATO troops, the country became less safe.

48. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the

Afghanistan is becoming less safe frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

62 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions that Afghanistan became less safe because of invasion of America, Canada etc., but without mentioning NATO. If ‘NATO’ is mentioned, please indicate ‘Yes’ for code 47. To illustrate, when article mentions Afghanistan is less safe since the 9/11 terror attack by America.

49. A combat mission

0 = not present

1 = present and frame is challenged

2 = present and frame is not challenged

Is coded ‘present’ when the article mentions military mission (the Netherlands, NATO or other country) is a fight or military operation. Is coded present when article explicitly mentions that the mission is a fight operation and combat troops are present in Afghanistan.

This can be related to several topics such as fight operation to dismantle Taliban or mission turned out to be a fight operation instead of a safekeeping operation. Is coded (1) ‘present and frame is challenged’ when article stresses that operation turned out to be a combat mission, but also challenges this in the same article. To illustrate, when article suggests mission turned out to be a combat operation, but the Dutch 3D approach is still present. Is coded (2) ‘present and frame is not challenged’ when article mentions mission is/became a fight/combat mission.

To illustrate, when article mentions that military mission turned out to be a combat mission and therefore, is no longer supported by politicians.

Example: Maar als je even verder kijkt, is er wel degelijk sprake van ondersteunende

gevechtstroepen. Dat maakt het voor ons onmogelijk om de missie te steunen.

Example: Uiteindelijk is de missie een gevechtsmissie geworden en is er niets

overgebleven van de wederopbouwmissie.

63 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

If coded (1) present and frame is challenged or (2) present and frame is not challenged, please continue. If coded (0) not present, go to 53.

50. Are Dutch explicitly associated with the combat mission frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when news article explicitly states that Dutch military mission became combat mission. To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article mentions that Dutch military are fighting against Taliban.

51. Is NATO more broadly explicitly associated with the combat mission frame?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’, when article explicitly mentions that NATO mission is a combat mission.

To illustrate, is coded ‘1’ when article states that NATO soldiers use weapons against

Taliban.

52. Is another country, independent of NATO, explicitly associated with the combat

mission?

0 = No

1 = Yes

Is coded (1) ‘Yes’ when article mentions that America, Canada etc. use weapons/fight in their mission or mention the combat mission, but without mentioning NATO. If ‘NATO’ is mentioned, please indicate ‘Yes’ for code 51. To illustrate, when article mentions that

America use weapons against Taliban.

64 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Part 3: The last part of the codebook is related to the type of sources used in the articles. A news article can reference multiple sources. All sources within an article should be counted and coded here.

VI – Elite sources (Bennett, 1990; Bennett, Lawrence & Livingstone, 2008; DeCillia, 2018;

Nossek, 2004)

Code the number of elite sources in the article. Please indicate the number of elite sources in the news article below, as it is aimed to count the number of elite sources. Elite sources can be used as a quote from a source, a news article based on a press release from governmental organisations or mentioning a political party etc. Code ‘present’ when the article mentions name, party, institutions etc. in the text which is related to the source. Elite sources contain:

1) governmental/military officials

2) an expert or academic from the field

3) political parties, which can be in government but also opposition parties.

Sources can be from every nationality. To illustrate, is coded ‘present’ when governmental or military official is used as a source (e.g. Major General, Afghan policeman in training, Vice

President or spokesman), expert/academic from the field (e.g. professor in Law of Military) and political parties (e.g. party member of GroenLinks or VVD). To illustrate, when the article mentions the statement of VVD this is coded as ‘1’, but when the article mentions the statement of GroenLinks and later in the article quotes a VVD minister it counts as ‘2’. Is also coded present when a source refers to another elite-source. For example, when minster refers to statement of another political party. Please code for ‘1’ source when article mentions the government, but when article mentions the government and a statement from political party in the government, please code ‘2’. Please take into account that it is possible that a text may consists of multiple sources. It is therefore required to mention the number of elite sources in

65 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME the news article. It is possible that the text also consists of non-elite sources, please indicate them in code 57-60. Please code the following elite sources (53-56):

53. Dutch elite sources

0 = not present

1 = one elite source is present

2 = two elite sources are present etc.

Is coded present when source is a Dutch elite source. To illustrate, someone from the Dutch government, Dutch military or Dutch political party.

Example: Bronnen bij het ministerie van Defensie bevestigen dat na 1 augustus 2008 gedurende twee jaar zo’n 1400 militairen naar Uruzgan worden gestuurd (= 1 elite source: bronnen binnen Ministerie van Defensie).

Example: Theo van den Doel, is consultant op het gebied van defensie en nationale veiligheid

(= 1 elite source: Theo van den Doel).

Example: Ook het vermeende militaire karakter van de missie is voor met name GroenLinks en de ChristenUnie een probleem. Zoals het voorstel er nu bij ligt gaan we niet instemmen met het kamerbesluit, zegt CU-Kamerlid Voordewind. De partij besprak gisteren in de fractie de missie. Volgens Voordewind was er binnen de zeskoppige fractie meer tegenstand dan hij had verwacht (= 3 elite sources: GroenLinks, ChristenUnie en Voordewind).

Example: De Nederlandse politie staat niet te springen om naar Afghanistan te worden uitgezonden (= 1 elite source: de Nederlandse politie).

54. Other Western elite sources

0 = not present

1 = one elite source is present

2 = two elite sources are present etc.

66 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Is coded present when source is another Western elite source. To illustrate, someone from the

American government, British military or European political party.

Example: De recente stijging van het aantal aanslagen in Afghanistan is onderdeel van een intimidatiecampagne van de Taliban om de uitbreiding van de NAVO-missie in Zuid-

Afghanistan tegen te houden. Dat heeft bevelhebber van de NAVO, Amerikaanse generaal

James Jones gezegd na een werkbezoek aan Irak (= 1 elite source: James Jones).

55. Afghan elite sources

0 = not present

1 = one elite source is present

2 = two elite sources are present etc.

Is coded present when source is an Afghan elite source. To illustrate, someone from the

Afghan government, Afghan military or Afghan political party.

Example: Zelfs president Hamid Karzai heeft zich lovend uitgelaten over het Nederlands-

Amerikaanse project aan de rand van Kamp Holland (= 1 elite source: President Hamid

Karzai).

56. Other elite sources

0 = not present

1 = one elite source is present

2 = two elite sources are present etc.

Is coded present when source is another elite source. To illustrate, someone from the Russian government, Iraq military or a Pakistani political party.

Example: Een hooggeplaatste Russische officier zegt dat Nederland grote fouten heeft gemaakt in Afghanistan (= 1 elite source: Russische officier).

67 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

VII – Non-elite sources (DeCillia, 2018; Gonen, 2018; Mythen, 2010)

Is coded ‘present’ when the news article uses a source which is a non-elite source. Please indicate the number of non-elite sources below, as it aimed to count the number of non-elite sources. To illustrate, is coded ‘present’ when the sources are Afghan citizens, Taliban or other terrorist groups, non-governmental organisations, (news) media or other political independent organisations etc. or when the source is consulted from social media (e.g. photo, video or quote), videos, WikiLeaks, (news) media etc. But do not code present when elite source is consulted from some type of media (e.g. Tweet by Minister of Defence), please code

(53-56). Furthermore, the source can be used from a non-governmental organizations’ press release, referencing to citizens opinions or statements, referring to family stories, but also research from news media etc. Please take into account that it is possible that a text consists of multiple sources, therefore it required to mention the number of non-elite sources in the news article. It is possible that the text also consists of elite sources (governmental/military sources, an expert or academic from the field or the political party), please indicate them in code 53-

56. Please code the following non-elite sources (57-60):

57. Dutch non-elite sources

0 = not present

1 = one non-elite source is present

2 = two non-elite sources are present etc.

Is coded present when source is a Dutch non-elite source. To illustrate, a Dutch newspaper,

Dutch non-profit organisation or Dutch citizen. Also coded present when article mentions international non-elite sources, but grounded in the Netherlands. For example, ‘Het Rode

Kruis’ is part of an international organisation: International Committee of the Red Cross, but is the Dutch organisation. Also coded present when article mentions non-elite source is quoted from social media or when article only mentions they used a video, picture, text from

68 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

(social) media and it is not clear if the source is elite or not. Do not code present when article mentions elite sources is quoted from social media or other media (code 53-56).

Example: Nederland droeg tijdens de Uruzgan-missie gevangen over aan de beruchte

Afghaanse veiligheidsdienst. Ze zouden goed worden behandeld, maar volgens een medewerker van het Rode Kruis is dat niet het geval, ‘het is daar erg onveilig’ (= 1 source: medewerker van het Rode Kruis).

58. Other Western non-elite sources

0 = not present

1 = one elite source is present

2 = two elite sources are present etc.

Is coded present when source is another Western non-elite source. To illustrate, an American newspaper, British non-profit organisation or a Canadian citizen. Code also present when article mentions international Western organisations. Also coded present when article mentions non-elite source is quoted from social media or when article only mentions they used a video, picture, text from (social) media and it is not clear if the source is elite or not.

Do not code present when article mentions elite sources is quoted from social media or other media (code 53-56).

Example: ‘Dit is de gevaarlijkste plek waar we tot nu toe zijn geweest’, zegt een werknemer van de financiële hulporganisatie World Council of Credit Unions (= 1 source: de werknemer).

59. Afghanistan non-elite sources

0 = not present

1 = one elite source is present

2 = two elite sources are present etc.

69 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Is coded present when source is an Afghan non-elite source. To illustrate, an Afghan media outlet or an Afghan citizen. Also coded present when article mentions non-elite source is quoted from social media or when article only mentions they used a video, picture, text from

(social) media and it is not clear if the source is elite or not. Do not code present when article mentions elite sources is quoted from social media or other media (code 53-56).

Example: ‘Als ik vijf kilometer de stad uitloop, hakken de Taliban mijn hoofd eraf!’, zegt

Amandullah (43). Hij maakt een snijbeweging langs zijn keel terwijl de tolk zijn woorden vertaalt (=1 source: Amandullah).

60. Other non-elite sources

0 = not present

1 = one elite source is present

2 = two elite sources are present etc.

Is coded present when source is another non-elite source. To illustrate, an Iraq non-profit organisation or Turkish citizens. Also coded present when article mentions non-elite source is quoted from social media or when article only mentions they used a video, picture, text from

(social) media and it is not clear if the source is elite or not. Do not code present when article mentions elite sources are quoted from social media or other media (code 53-56) or another non-elite source is quoted from social media or other media (57-59).

Example: Een video die circuleert op het internet laat zien dat de Nederlandse militairen geweld gebruiken tegen Afghaanse burgers (=1 source: video op het internet).

70 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Appendix III – Reliability scales

Table 1 Intercoder Reliability mentioning mission Krippendorff’s Alpha Reconstruction frame and Dutch .98 Reconstruction frame and NATO .97 Reconstruction frame and others .99 Mentoring frame and Dutch .97 Mentoring frame and NATO .99 Mentoring frame and others 1.0 Diplomacy frame and Dutch .96 Diplomacy frame and NATO .98 Diplomacy frame and others 1.0 International status frame and Dutch .86 International status frame and NATO .70 International status frame and others .62 Decrease of violence frame and Dutch .85 Decrease of violence frame and NATO .96 Decrease of violence frame and others .99 Brave soldiers frame and Dutch .91 Brave soldiers frame and NATO .97 Brave soldiers frame and others .95 Personalisation frame and Dutch .92 Personalisation frame and NATO .99 Personalisation frame and others .98 Doubts frame and Dutch .93 Doubts frame and NATO .98 Doubts frame and others .98 The downfall of the mission frame and Dutch .92 The Downfall of the mission frame and NATO .89 The Downfall of the mission frame and others .96 Afghanistan is becoming less safe frame and Dutch .69 Afghanistan is becoming less safe frame and NATO .80 Afghanistan is becoming less safe frame and others .99 Combat mission frame and Dutch .63 Combat mission frame and NATO .70 Combat mission frame and others .72 Note. ICR is calculated by Hayes macro for Krippendorff’s Alpha

71 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Appendix IV– Overview mean scores recoded cluster frames

Table 2. Mean scores for clusters total presence of frames M SD N Total presence positive frames 0.61 0.49 388 Total presence personalisation frames 0.37 0.48 388 Total presence negative frames 0.39 0.45 388

72 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

Appendix V - sources and frames over the years

A. Overview sources over time

4,5 De Telegraaf De Volkskrant

4

3,5

3

2,5

2

1,5

1 Mean score elite sources elite sources score Mean

0,5

0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Year

Figure 2. Elite sources over time

2,5 De Telegraaf De Volkskrant

2

1,5 elite sources elite sources -

1

0,5 Mean score non score Mean

0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Year Figure 3. Non-elite sources over time

73 DUTCH MEDIA COVERAGE IN WARTIME

B. Overview frames over time

25 De Telegraaf De Volkskrant

20

15

10

5 Number of negative frames over time over frames of negative Number

0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Year Figure 4. Negative frames over time

25 De Telegraaf De Volkskrant

over time over 20

15

10

5 Number of positive challenged frames frames ofchallenged positive Number

0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Year

Figure 5. Positive and challenged frames over time