FAMILY Torpedinidae Henle, 1834

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FAMILY Torpedinidae Henle, 1834 FAMILY Torpedinidae Henle, 1834 - electric torpedo rays [=?Plagiostomes Dumeril, 1805, Torpedines Henle, 1834, Narcaciontoidae Gill, 1862, Narcobatidae Jordan, 1895] Notes: ?Plagiostomes Duméril, 1805:102 [ref. 1151] (family) ? Torpedo [sometimes seen as Plagiostomata; no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Torpedines Henle, 1834:29 [ref. 2092] (Gruppe?) Torpedo [stem Torpedin- confirmed by Bonaparte 1835:[3] [ref. 32242], by Günther 1870:448 [ref. 1995], by Gill 1873:790 [ref. 17631], by Carus 1893:527 [ref. 17975], by Fowler 1947:15 [ref. 1458], by Lindberg 1971:56 [ref. 27211] and by Nelson 1976:42 [ref. 32838]; name sometimes seen as Torpedidae or Torpedinae; senior objective synonym of Narcobatidae Jordan, 1895] Narcaciontoidae Gill, 1862p:386 [ref. 1783] (family) Narcacion [also as subfamily Narcaciontinae] Narcobatidae Jordan, 1895:387 [ref. 2394] (family) Narcobatus [junior objective synonym of Torpedines, invalid, Article 61.3.2] GENUS Tetronarce Gill, 1862 - torpedo rays [=Tetronarce Gill [T. N.], 1862:387] Notes: [ref. 1783]. Fem. Torpedo occidentalis Storer, 1843. Type by original designation as name in parentheses in key (also monotypic). Spelled Tetranarce by Jordan 1919:307 [ref. 4904], who regarded the original Tetronarce as a misspelling. Tetronarcine Tanaka, 1908:2 is a misspelling. •Synonym of Torpedo Houttuyn, 1764, but a valid subgenus Tetronarce -- (Compagno 1999:487 [ref. 25589], Carvalho et al. 2002:2 [ref. 26091], Haas & Ebert 2006:1 [ref. 28818]). •Synonym of Torpedo Houttuyn, 1764 -- (Cappetta 1987:161 [ref. 6348], Compagno & Heemstra 2007:43 [ref. 29194]). •Valid as Tetronarce Gill, 1862 -- (Ebert et al. 2013:341 [ref. 33045]). Current status: Valid as Tetronarce Gill, 1862. Torpedinidae. Species Tetronarce californica (Ayres, 1855) - Pacific electric ray [=Torpedo californica Ayres [W. O.], 1855:70] Notes: [Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences (Series 1) v. 1 (pt 1); ref. 159] San Francisco, California, U.S.A. Current status: Valid as Tetronarce californica (Ayres, 1855). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Eastern Pacific, possibly Japan. Habitat: marine. Species Tetronarce cowleyi Ebert et al., 2015 - Cowley's torpedo ray [=Tetronarce cowleyi Ebert [D. A.], Haas [D. L.] & de Carvalho [M. R.], 2015:239, Figs. 2-6] Notes: [Zootaxa 3936 (no. 2); ref. 33710] Atlantic Ocean, off the west coast of South Africa, 33°39.0'S, 17°34.0'E, depth 262 meters. Current status: Valid as Tetronarce cowleyi Ebert, Haas & de Carvalho, 2015. Torpedinidae. Distribution: Namibia to South Africa. Habitat: marine. Species Tetronarce formosa (Haas & Ebert, 2006) - Taiwan torpedo ray [=Torpedo formosa Haas [D. L.] & Ebert [D. A.], 2006:2, Figs. 1-3] Notes: [Zootaxa No. 1320; ref. 28818] Tashi Fish Market, Tashi [Daxi], northeastern Taiwan, 24°53'N, 122°01'E. Current status: Valid as Tetronarce formosa (Haas & Ebert, 2006). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Western Pacific: Taiwan. Habitat: marine. Species Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835) - Atlantic torpedo [=Torpedo nobiliana Bonaparte [C. L.], 1835:fasc. 12, punt. 63, Pl. 154, Torpedo emarginata McCoy [F.], 1841:407, Fig., Torpedo fairchildi Hutton [F. W.], 1872:83, Pl. 12 (fig. 134), Torpedo fusca Parker [T. J.], 1884:283, Pl. 22, Torpedo hebetans Lowe [R. T.], 1838:195, Notastrape macneilli Whitley [G. P.], 1932:327, Torpedo nigra Guichenot [A.], 1850:131, Pl. 8 (figs. 1, 1a-1b), Torpedo walshii Thompson [W.], 1856:256] Notes: [Iconografia della fauna italica; ref. 518] Italy, western Mediterranean Sea. Current status: Valid as Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Mediterranean Sea, eastern Atlantic: North Sea to South Africa including Madeira and Canary Islands; ?western Atlantic: Nova Scotia (Canada) to Brazil. Habitat: marine. (emarginata) [Annals and Magazine of Natural History (New Series) v. 6 (no. 39) (art. 46); ref. 17754] Dublin Bay, Ireland, northeastern Atlantic. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835). Torpedinidae. Habitat: marine. (fairchildi) [Fishes of New Zealand (Hutton); ref. 2287] Napier Harbor, New Zealand. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835). Torpedinidae. Distribution: New Zealand, possibly Norfolk Island [if valid]. Habitat: marine. (fusca) [Transactions New Zealand Institute v. 16 (art. 19); ref. 13764] Purakanui, near Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835). Torpedinidae. Habitat: marine. (hebetans) [Transactions of the Zoological Society of London v. 2 (pt 3, art. 14); ref. 2831] Madeira, eastern Atlantic. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835). Torpedinidae. Habitat: marine. (macneilli) [Records of the Australian Museum v. 18 (no. 6); ref. 4674] 9 miles east of Green Cape, New South Wales, Australia, depth 49 fathoms. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Australia or Indo-West Pacific [if valid]. Habitat: marine. (nigra) [Histoire naturelle des reptiles et poissons; ref. 1940] Algeria, western Mediterranean Sea. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835). Torpedinidae. Habitat: marine. (walshii) [Fishes of Ireland; ref. 4390] Ireland, northeastern Atlantic. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce nobiliana (Bonaparte, 1835). Torpedinidae. Habitat: marine. Species Tetronarce occidentalis (Storer, 1843) - Atlantic torpedo [=Torpedo occidentalis Storer [D. H.], 1843:166, Pl. 3 (figs. 1-2)] Notes: [American Journal of Science and Arts v. 45 (no. 1) (art. 18); ref. 18832] Wellfleet, Massachusetts, U.S.A., eastern North Atlantic. Current status: Valid as Tetronarce occidentalis (Storer, 1843). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Massachusetts (U.S.A.) to Venezuela. Habitat: marine. Species Tetronarce puelcha (Lahille, 1926) - Argentine torpedo [=Torpedo puelcha Lahille [F.], 1926:408] Notes: [Physis (Buenos Aires) v. 8 (no. 28); ref. 24910] Off Buenos Aires, Argentina. Current status: Valid as Tetronarce puelcha (Lahille, 1926). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Southwestern Atlantic. Habitat: marine. Species Tetronarce tokionis Tanaka, 1908 - trapezoid torpedo ray, longtail torpedo ray [=Tetronarcine tokionis Tanaka [S.], 1908:2, Figured] Notes: [Journal of the College of Science. Imperial University, Tokyo v. 23 (art. 7); ref. 6032] Tokyo fish market, Japan. Current status: Valid as Tetronarce tokionis Tanaka, 1908. Torpedinidae. Distribution: Western North Pacific. Habitat: marine. Species Tetronarce tremens (de Buen, 1959) - Chilean torpedo [=Torpedo tremens de Buen [F.], 1959:259, Fig. 1, Torpedo microdiscus Parin [N. V.] & Kotlyar [A. N.], 1985:709, Figs. 1a, 2, Torpedo tremens peruana Chirichigno F. [N.], 1963:4, Fig. 1, Torpedo semipelagica Parin [N. V.] & Kotlyar [A. N.], 1985:714, Figs. 1c, 5] Notes: [Revista de Biologia Marina, Valparaiso v. 9 (nos 1-3); ref. 11964] Near Valparaíso, Chile. Current status: Valid as Tetronarce tremens (de Buen, 1959). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Eastern Pacific: Costa Rica to Chile and offshore islands. Habitat: marine. (microdiscus) [Voprosy Ikhtiologii v. 25 (no. 5); ref. 17260] Junction of Naska and Sala y Gomez ridges, southeastern Pacific, 25°39'S, 85°23'W, depth 180-280 meters. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce tremens (de Buen, 1959). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Chile [if valid]. Habitat: marine. (peruana) [Serrie de divulgación cientifica / Servicio de Pesquería, Ministerio de Agriculture. Lima, No. 20; ref. 4484] Paita Bay, Peru. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce tremens (de Buen, 1959). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Peru and Galápagos Islands [if valid]. Habitat: marine. (semipelagica) [Voprosy Ikhtiologii v. 25 (no. 5); ref. 17260] Junction of Naska and Sala y Gomez ridges, southeastern Pacific, 25°27'[or 25°42']S, 85°27'W depth 175-210 meters. Current status: Synonym of Tetronarce tremens (de Buen, 1959). Torpedinidae. Distribution: Chile [if valid]. Habitat: marine. GENUS Torpedo Dumeril, 1806 - torpedo rays [=Torpedo Duméril [A. M. C.], 1806:102, 343, Eunarce (subgenus of Narcobatus) Fowler [H. W.], 1910:472, Fimbriotorpedo (subgenus of Torpedo) Fritsch [G. T.], 1884:451, Gymnotorpedo (subgenus of Torpedo) Fritsch [G. T.], 1884:451, Narcacion Klein [J. T.], 1776:237, Narcacion Walbaum [J. J.] (ex Klein), 1792:580, Narcacion Gill [T. N.] (ex Klein), 1861:61, Narcacion Bleeker [P.] (ex Klein), 1865:171, Narcobatus (subgenus of Raia) Blainville [H. de], 1816:121, Notastrape Whitley [G. P.], 1932:327, Tetronarcine Tanaka [S.], 1908:2, Torpedo Houttuyn [M.], 1764:453, Torpedo Rafinesque [C. S.], 1810:48, 60] Notes: [ref. 1151]. Fem. Raja torpedo Linnaeus, 1758. Type by subsequent monotypy. Appeared without species, first addition of species probably by Bonaparte 1838:7 (of separate) [ref. 4979]. Torpedo Houttuyn, 1764 is presented as a species name and not a generic name, so the authorship is hereby changed to Duméril 1806 (see Welter-Schultes & Feuerstein 2008:141 [ref. 30327]). •Valid as Torpedo Duméril, 1806 -- (Haas & Ebert 2006:1 [ref. 28818], Paxton et al. 2006:165 [ref. 28995], Gomon 2008:101 [ref. 30616]). Current status: Valid as Torpedo Duméril, 1806. Torpedinidae. (Eunarce) [ref. 1379]. Fem. Torpedo narke Risso, 1810. Type by original designation. •Synonym of Torpedo Houttuyn, 1764 -- (Krefft & Stehmann 1973:55 [ref. 7167], Cappetta 1987:161 [ref. 6348], Compagno & Heemstra 2007:43 [ref. 29194]). Current status: Synonym of Torpedo Houttuyn, 1764. Torpedinidae. (Fimbriotorpedo) [ref. 1510]. Fem. Torpedo marmorata Risso,
Recommended publications
  • The Occurrences and Reclassification of Torpedo Panthera in Iraqi Marine Waters
    Annals of R.S.C.B., ISSN:1583-6258, Vol. 25, Issue 6, 2021, Pages. 3736 - 3741 Received 25 April 2021; Accepted 08 May 2021. The Occurrences and Reclassification of Torpedo Panthera in Iraqi Marine Waters Mujtaba. A.T. Ankush1, Ahmed Chasib Al-Shamary2 1Department of Fish and Marine Resources, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq. 2Marine Science Center, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT When two specimens of the Torpedo Panthera electric straw were caught in Iraqi marine waters in November 2020, their presence was known and reclassified through the study of 17 Morphometric characters, some of which were correlated with salinity Disk length, Disk width, and Eye diameter, and others with temperature First dorsal fin length, Second dorsal fin and Tail length, During the research, the chemical composition of the ray was investigated. KEYWORDS Torpedo Panthera, Iraqi Marine Water, Morphometric Characters, Rays. Introduction They are unmistakably monophyletic, with large pectoral electric organs derived from bronchial muscles, anteriorly expanded and branched antorbital cartilages, a neurocranium lacking supraorbital crests, and posteriorly arched scapulocoracoids, among other features, distinguishing them from other batoids (Compagno, 1977; McEachran et al., 1996). Electric ray species belonging to the genus Torpedo panthera Torpedo Houttuyn, 1764, is a genus of medium to large electric rays that can grow up to 180 cm in total length and can be found in tropical and temperate waters all over the world, from the shoreline to about 600 m on the continental slope. Larger specimens are capable of producing strong electric shocks that have been reported to reach a discharge of 220 volts (Coates and Cox, 1942; Bigelow and Schroeder, 1953).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Identification Guide to the Sharks and Rays of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden
    FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE FOR FISHERY PURPOSES ISSN 1020-6868 FIELD IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO THE SHARKS AND RAYS OF THE RED SEA AND GULF OF ADEN PERSGA FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE FOR FISHERY PURPOSES FIELD IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO THE SHARKS AND RAYS OF THE RED SEA AND GULF OF ADEN by Ramón Bonfil Marine Program Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx, New York, USA and Mohamed Abdallah Strategic Action Program Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Jeddah, Saudi Arabia FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2004 iii PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT This document was prepared under the coordination of the Species Identification and Data Programme of the Marine Resources Service, Fishery Resources and Environment Division, Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). This field guide is largely based on material prepared for training courses on elasmobranch identification delivered in the region by the first author, and promoted by the Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (PERSGA), as an activity of PERSGA’s Strategic Action Programme (SAP) towards capacity building and technical assistance in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden region. Printing was supported by Japanese Government funds. The increasing recognition of the significance of sharks and batoid fishes as ecosystem health indicators, as well as their particular importance in exploited ecosystems in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, have been key considerations to promote the preparation of this Field Guide. Furthermore, in recent years the reported catches of elasmobranchs in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden showed a marked increase.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Classification of Elasmobranchs
    An introduction to the classification of elasmobranchs 17 Rekha J. Nair and P.U Zacharia Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682 018 Introduction eyed, stomachless, deep-sea creatures that possess an upper jaw which is fused to its cranium (unlike in sharks). The term Elasmobranchs or chondrichthyans refers to the The great majority of the commercially important species of group of marine organisms with a skeleton made of cartilage. chondrichthyans are elasmobranchs. The latter are named They include sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. These for their plated gills which communicate to the exterior by organisms are characterised by and differ from their sister 5–7 openings. In total, there are about 869+ extant species group of bony fishes in the characteristics like cartilaginous of elasmobranchs, with about 400+ of those being sharks skeleton, absence of swim bladders and presence of five and the rest skates and rays. Taxonomy is also perhaps to seven pairs of naked gill slits that are not covered by an infamously known for its constant, yet essential, revisions operculum. The chondrichthyans which are placed in Class of the relationships and identity of different organisms. Elasmobranchii are grouped into two main subdivisions Classification of elasmobranchs certainly does not evade this Holocephalii (Chimaeras or ratfishes and elephant fishes) process, and species are sometimes lumped in with other with three families and approximately 37 species inhabiting species, or renamed, or assigned to different families and deep cool waters; and the Elasmobranchii, which is a large, other taxonomic groupings. It is certain, however, that such diverse group (sharks, skates and rays) with representatives revisions will clarify our view of the taxonomy and phylogeny in all types of environments, from fresh waters to the bottom (evolutionary relationships) of elasmobranchs, leading to a of marine trenches and from polar regions to warm tropical better understanding of how these creatures evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine-Life Data and Analysis Team (Mdat) Technical Report on the Methods and Development of Marine-Life Data to Support Regional Ocean Planning and Management
    MARINE-LIFE DATA AND ANALYSIS TEAM (MDAT) TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE METHODS AND DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE-LIFE DATA TO SUPPORT REGIONAL OCEAN PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PBS.org NEFSC Andreas Trepte, www.photo-natur.de Authors: Corrie Curtice, Jesse Cleary, Emily Shumchenia, Patrick Halpin Prepared on behalf of The Marine-life Data and Analysis Team (MDAT): Patrick Halpin (Principal Investigator, Duke University), Earvin Balderama (Co-I, Loyola University Chicago), Jesse Cleary (Duke University), Corrie Curtice (Duke University), Michael Fogarty (Co-I, NOAA/NEFSC), Brian Kinlan† (NOAA/NCCOS), Charles Perretti (NOAA/NEFSC), Marta Ribera (TNC), Jason Roberts (Duke University), Emily Shumchenia (NROC), Arliss Winship (Co-I, NOAA/NCCOS) Date published: 24 June 2019 Project manager and point of contact: Jesse Cleary, Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 em: [email protected] ph: 919-684-3660 w: mgel.env.duke.edu Accessible from: http://seamap.env.duke.edu/models/MDAT/MDAT-Technical- Report.pdf † Deceased January 27, 2017 Marine-life Data and Analysis Team Technical Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2014, the Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab (MGEL) of Duke University began work with the Northeast Regional Ocean Council (NROC), the NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS), the NOAA Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC), and Loyola University Chicago, as part of the Marine-life Data and Analysis Team (MDAT), to characterize and map marine life in the Northeast region, at the request of the Northeast Regional Planning Body (NE RPB) to support the Northeast Ocean Plan. These research groups collaborated to produce “base layer” distribution products for cetacean, avian, and fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Batoid Abundances, Spatial Distribution, and Life History Traits
    animals Article Batoid Abundances, Spatial Distribution, and Life History Traits in the Strait of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea): Bridging a Knowledge Gap through Three Decades of Survey Michele Luca Geraci 1,2 , Sergio Ragonese 2,*, Danilo Scannella 2, Fabio Falsone 2, Vita Gancitano 2 , Jurgen Mifsud 3, Miriam Gambin 3, Alicia Said 3 and Sergio Vitale 2 1 Geological and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA)–Marine Biology and Fisheries Laboratory, Department of Biological, University of Bologna, Viale Adriatico 1/n, 61032 Fano, PU, Italy; [email protected] 2 Institute for Marine Biological Resources and Biotechnology (IRBIM), National Research Council–CNR, Via Luigi Vaccara, 61, 91026 Mazara del Vallo, TP, Italy; [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (V.G.); [email protected] (S.V.) 3 Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries and Animal Rights (MAFA), Ghammieri Government Farm, Triq l-Ingiered, Malta; [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (A.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Batoid species are cartilaginous fish commonly known as rays, but they also Citation: Geraci, M.L.; Ragonese, S.; include stingrays, electric rays, guitarfish, skates, and sawfish. These species are very sensitive Scannella, D.; Falsone, F.; Gancitano, to fishing, mainly because of their slow growth rate and late maturity; therefore, they need to be V.; Mifsud, J.; Gambin, M.; Said, A.; adequately managed. Regrettably, information on life history traits (e.g., length at first maturity, Vitale, S. Batoid Abundances, Spatial sex ratio, and growth) and abundance are still scarce, particularly in the Mediterranean Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Chondrichthyan Fishes Inhabiting the Northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea
    Zootaxa 4803 (2): 281–315 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4803.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:325DB7EF-94F7-4726-BC18-7B074D3CB886 An annotated checklist of the chondrichthyan fishes inhabiting the northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea CHRISTIAN M. JONES1,*, WILLIAM B. DRIGGERS III1,4, KRISTIN M. HANNAN2, ERIC R. HOFFMAYER1,5, LISA M. JONES1,6 & SANDRA J. RAREDON3 1National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, Mississippi, U.S.A. 2Riverside Technologies Inc., Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, Missis- sippi, U.S.A. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2687-3331 3Smithsonian Institution, Division of Fishes, Museum Support Center, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland, U.S.A. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-6000 4 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-968X 5 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-9546 6 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2228-7156 *Corresponding author. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-1127 Abstract Herein we consolidate the information available concerning the biodiversity of batoid fishes in the northern Gulf of Mexico, including nearly 70 years of survey data collected by the National Marine Fisheries Service, Mississippi Laboratories and their predecessors. We document 41 species proposed to occur in the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Chondrichthyan Fishes Inhabiting the Northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea
    Zootaxa 4803 (2): 281–315 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4803.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:325DB7EF-94F7-4726-BC18-7B074D3CB886 An annotated checklist of the chondrichthyan fishes inhabiting the northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea CHRISTIAN M. JONES1,*, WILLIAM B. DRIGGERS III1,4, KRISTIN M. HANNAN2, ERIC R. HOFFMAYER1,5, LISA M. JONES1,6 & SANDRA J. RAREDON3 1National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, Mississippi, U.S.A. 2Riverside Technologies Inc., Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, Missis- sippi, U.S.A. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2687-3331 3Smithsonian Institution, Division of Fishes, Museum Support Center, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland, U.S.A. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-6000 4 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-968X 5 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-9546 6 �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2228-7156 *Corresponding author. �[email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-1127 Abstract Herein we consolidate the information available concerning the biodiversity of batoid fishes in the northern Gulf of Mexico, including nearly 70 years of survey data collected by the National Marine Fisheries Service, Mississippi Laboratories and their predecessors. We document 41 species proposed to occur in the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Status of Mediterranean Chondrichthyan Species
    United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre For Specially Protected Areas REPORT ON THE STATUS OF MEDITERRANEAN CHONDRICHTHYAN SPECIES D. CEBRIAN © L. MASTRAGOSTINO © R. DUPUY DE LA GRANDRIVE © Note : The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. © 2007 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P.337 –1080 Tunis CEDEX E-mail : [email protected] Citation: UNEP-MAP RAC/SPA, 2007. Report on the status of Mediterranean chondrichthyan species. By Melendez, M.J. & D. Macias, IEO. Ed. RAC/SPA, Tunis. 241pp The original version (English) of this document has been prepared for the Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) by : Mª José Melendez (Degree in Marine Sciences) & A. David Macías (PhD. in Biological Sciences). IEO. (Instituto Español de Oceanografía). Sede Central Spanish Ministry of Education and Science Avda. de Brasil, 31 Madrid Spain [email protected] 2 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION 3 3. HUMAN IMPACTS ON SHARKS 8 3.1 Over-fishing 8 3.2 Shark Finning 8 3.3 By-catch 8 3.4 Pollution 8 3.5 Habitat Loss and Degradation 9 4. CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR MEDITERRANEAN SHARKS 9 REFERENCES 10 ANNEX I. LIST OF CHONDRICHTHYAN OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA 11 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997
    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
    [Show full text]