Anwyl, John, Ed
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 293 394 HE 021 065 AUTHOR Jones, David R., Ed.; Anwyl, John, Ed. TITLE Privatizing Higher Education: A New Australian Issue. INSTITUTION Melbourne Univ. (Australia). Centre for the Study of Higher Education. REPORT NO ISBN-0-949036-26-9 PUB DATE 87 NOTE 139p.; Papers presented at the conference on "Private Initiatives in Higher Education" (Canberra, Australia, May 21-22, 1987). PUB TYPE Collected Works Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Administrative Policy; College Administration; Educational Finance; *Financial Policy; Foreign Students; *Higher Education; Marketing; Private Colleges; *Private Education; *Private Financial Support; Proprietary Schools; Public Colleges; Tuition IDENTIFIERS *Australia; *Privatization ABSTRACT The papers in this collection deal with the concept of "privatization" in higher education in both the traditional sense of student finance and in relation to recent usage involving non-government funding of research, provision of full-fee places alongside free places in public institutions, the founding of a private sector in addition to the public, and the marketing of academic services to foreign students. The conference was organized by the Centre for Administrative and Higher Education Studies of the University of New England and the University of Melbourne's Centre for the Study of Higher Education. The following papers are presented: (1) "Private Initiatives in Higher Education" (Peter Karmel); (2) "Address on Policy" (Susan Ryan); (3) "Address on Policy" (Peter Shack); (4) "The Private Potential of Australian Higher Education" (Donald W. Watts); (5) "New Australian Policy Initiatives for Overseas Students: The IDP Experience" (Ken Back); (6) "Biscuits, Bicycles, and B.Sc's" (Roger Scott); (7) "Initial Plans for an Internationally Significant Private University" (A. John T. Ford and Donald W. Watts); (8) "The Hybrid Approach" (Rod Treyvaud); (9) "The Australian Predicament in Comparative Perspective" (Roger L. Geiger); and (10) "Concluding Summary: Emerging Themes in the Discussion of Private Initiatives in Higher Education in Australia" (David Beswick). (KM) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** Privatizing HigherEducation: A New AustralianIssue Edited by David R Jones andJohn Anwyl , :h^3 tom, U.S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION %..tM Othce of Educational Research and improvement ar-," EOUCAII AL RESOURCEINFORMATION r CENTER (ERICS) s document nes been reproduced as ;r47;k° received from tne person or organization originating it Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction Quality Points of view or opinions stated in this doCu. ment do not necessarily retvesent official OERI position or policy "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCETHIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTEDBY University of Melbourne TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." The University of Melbourne1987 ti PRIV A TI Z IN G HIGHER EDUCATION A NEW AUSTRALIAN ISSUE EDITED B Y DAVID R. JONES AND JOHN ANWYL CS HE, THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE, 1987 0 Li = PRIVATIZING HIGHER EDUCATION: A NEW AUSTRALIAN ISSUE Edited by David R. Jones and John Anwyl Copyright remains with the individual contributors Camera-readied by D/L Word Services, Armidale, NSW. Printed and Published by The Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne, 1987. IBSN 0 949036 26 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The editors of a collective volume based upon the proceedings of a confer- ence must inevitably have many people to thank. First, all the speakers at the conference on "Private Initiatives in Higher Education" for their efforts of preparati, a and presentation, and for revising their papers for publica- tion in this volume. Next, all of those who attended at University House, ANU on 21 & 22 May, and helped to make the conference a stimulating experience. Finally all the members of the Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne and in the Centre for Administrative and Higher Education Studies, University of New England, who helped out, and especially V.L. Meek, G.S. Harman, J. Weeks, and G. Swafford of UNE, J. Julian, T. Makin, and A. Pottage of Melbourne. Lynn Meek's editorial assistance was invaluable. Our thanks also to D. Meek of i)/L Word Services. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION JOHN ANVVYL AND DAVID R. JONES CH. ONE PRIVATE INITIATIVES IN HIGHER EDUCATION PETER KARMEL CH. TWO ADDRESS ON PCLICY SUSAN RYAN 13 CH. THREE ADDRESS ON POLICY PETER SHACK 19 CH. FOUR THE PRIVATE POTENTIAT OF AUSTRALIAN HIGHER EDUCATION DONALD W. WATTS 29 CH. FIVE NEW AUSTRALIAN POLICY INITIATIVES FOR OVERSEAS STUDENTS: THE IDP EXPERIENCE KEN BACK 47 CH. SIX BISCUITS, BICYCLES, AND B.SC'S RO3ER SCOTT 57 CH. SEVEN INITIAL PLANS FOR AN INTERNATIONALLY SIGNIFICANT PRIVATE UNIVERSITY A. JOHNT.FORD AND DONALD W. WATTS 75 CH. EIGHT THE HYBRID APPROACH ROD TREYVAUD 97 CH. NINE THE AUSTRALIAN PREDICAMENT IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ROGER L. GEIGER 103 CH. TEN CONCLUDING SUMMARY: EMERGING THEMES IN THE DISCUSSION OF PRIVATE INITIATIVES IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN AUSTRALIA DAVID BESWICK 119 C INTRODUCTION JOHN ANWYL Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne and DAVID R. JONES Centre for Administrative and Higher Education Studies, University of New England This publication is derived from a Conference on Private Initiatives in Higher Education held at the Australian National University, Canberra, on May 21-22, 1987. Authors have revised the papers they presented there. The conference was organized by the editors on behalf of the Centre for Administrative and Higher Education Studies (CAHES) of the University of New England and the Centre for the Study of Higher Education (CSHE) at the University of Melbourne. Our purpose in staging the conference was straightforward. For several years privatization had been developing salience as an issue, but by late 1986 when our conference planning began it dominated the higher educa- tion debate.There was no parallel of this remarkably rapid issue emergence in higher education in our time in a comparable western country. There remains an element of unreality about its sudden appearance and rapid ascendancy; in the title we have given this publication we simply record the fact that privatizing higher education is a new Australian issue. The fast growth is largely growth in tr.lk; at present substantial change and development are prospective only. In so far as 'privatization' was used over most of the previous decade (and it was eldom used) it was mainly in the context of the recurring de- bates about student finance, especially living allowances, loans, and fees. The Whitlam Federal Government abolished tuition fees for first and sub- sequent degrees and diplomas in 1974 and during the Fraser Liberal Gov- ernment (1975-1983) interest groups were periodically preoccupied about fees and loan schemes. By late 1986 privatization was entrenched in higher education jargon with usage extending to very different meanings including non-government funding of research, provision of full fee places alongside free places in public institutions, the founding of a private sector alongside the public, and the marketing of academic services to foreigners studying in r ANWYL & JONES their country or ours. It seemed increasingly urgent to record and analyse some of the many meanings already acquired by this abstraction. Higher education had a new phenomenon to address, and policy-mak- ers in government, education, commerce, industry and the philanthropic foundations sought to know more about it.It was said, rather narrowly, that public and professional debate on privatization was crippled by ideolo- gy. We do not question the significance or necessity of ideological debate but we wanted to make available for use in that debate some scholarly anal- ysis of recent Australian developments and proposals and some of the fruits of scholarly work on private higher education abroad. We hope to inform and assist the vigorous young Australian debate. We wanted to put on record what various protagonists were talldng about, place it in the context of Australian social-political relationships, and identify possible conse- quences of policy ideas. We invited a panel of speakers who could contribute overseas and Aus- tralian expertise and experience. Professor Peter Kannel, Vice-Chancellor of the Australian National University and former Chairman of the Com- monwealth Tertiary Education Commission focussed primarily on the is- sues related to tuition fees. Professor Roger Scott, President of the Aca- demic Board of the University of Queensland, discussed the potential effects of privatization on public institutions. Dr Roger Geiger, of the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University and an authority on private higher education sectors in many countries, placed the Australian situation in a comparative international context. Emeritus Professor Ken Back, Executive Director of the International Development Programme created by the university vice-chancellors and advanced education college directors and principals, outlined the international activities assisted by that body. Professor Don Watts, then Vice-Chancellor of Curtin University of Technology and now President and Vice-Chancellor of Bond University (Surfers Paradise, Queensland);Dr Rod Treyvaud, Principal of the Northern Rivers College