Meeting #9/03, Held on October 3, 2003 652

INDEX TO

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES #10/03

Friday, November 14, 2003

MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #9/03, held on October 3, 2003 652

CORRESPONDENCE Howe, J. Patrick, President, North Rosedale Ratepayers Association re: item 7.1 - Hearing Report 652 Longo, Leo, Solicitor, Aird & Berlis LLP re: item 7.1 - Hearing Report 652

HEARING REPORT 658

NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Humber River Watershed Autumn Grove Builders Limited. CFN 34820 672 Ballymore Development (Wolfson) Corporation. CFN 34740 669 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Rouge River Watershed Tormina Construction (Richmond Hill) Limited. CFN 34776 666

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Conveyance of Land for the Widening of Islington Avenue, between Rutherford Road and Major Mackenzie Drive, City of Vaughan. 675

BELL CANADA Request for Permanent Easement 678

ASIAN LONGHORNED BEETLE (ALHB) 682, 762

ONTARIO REGULATION 158 1525292 Ontario Limited c/o Villarboit Development Corporation 731 1557257 Ontario Inc. 743 Atkins, Joe & Vicki 739 Casados, Phyllis/Anne Nerenberg/Gil Casados 746 Catenacci, Sabino 713 Chase, Leslie & Robb 692 ONTARIO REGULATION 158 (Cont'd) Chisholm, Ted & Mary Eliz Sullivan 725 City of Toronto 689, 690, 694, 696, 697, 702, 707, 708, 710, 711 City of Toronto (District 4) 736 Corporation of the Town of Markham 721 Culture and Tourism City of Toronto Economic Development 703 De Larzac, Hanna 722 Dufferin Construction Co. 730, 740, 742 Enbridge Gas Distribution Inc. 685 Giancola, Bruno 745 H.A. Hornung Investments Ltd. 716 Harmony Park Properties Inc. 734 Hydro One 686 Kogan, Valeri 728 Kovacevic, Jozo 733 K.P. Isberg Construction Inc. 698 Lapiccirella, Matthew 717 Lazardis, Nick 705, 706 Lebovic Enterprises Ltd. (1320991 Ontario Ltd.) 750 Mason, Andrew 718 Mattamy (Wilcox) Limited 747 Nerenberg, Anne/Phyllis Casados/Gil Casados 746 Ontario Power Generation 688 Paquette, Katherine 740 Papadimitropoulos, Manny & Teresa 724 Perfetto, Sandra 736 Prentice, Connie & Barry 720 P.S. Production Services 712 Ranieri, Teresa 714 Regional Municipality of York 727 Reit, Cap 701 Roma Premium Meats Ltd. 748 Rose, Lorne 699 Sullivan, Mary Eliz & Ted Chisholm 725 Toronto Catholic District School Board 693 Ware, Eleanor 737 Woodhouse, Frances 736

ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Delegation of Minor Works Approvals to Staff 751

ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD APPEALS Draft Plans of Subdivisions, Springdale Secondary Plan Area 754

APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Steve Heuchert 757

TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Planning Consultant Selection 757 FLOODLINE MAPPING UPDATE FOR THE MAIN HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED WITHIN THE REGION OF YORK 759

FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING AND SPECIAL POLICY AREA UPDATE FOR THE DUFFINS CREEK WATERSHED 760

ACQUISITION OF VEHICLE 761

NEW BUSINESS Asian Longhorned Beetle (ALHB) 762 MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #10/03 November 14, 2003

The Executive Committee Meeting #10/03, was held in the South Theatre, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, November 14, 2003. The Chair Dick O'Brien, called the meeting to order at 10:41 a.m.

PRESENT Maria Augimeri Member Michael Di Biase Member Irene Jones Member Jim McMaster Vice Chair Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member

REGRETS Lorna Bissell Member Ron Moeser Member

RES.#B146/03 - MINUTES

Moved by: Irene Jones Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the Minutes of Meeting #9/03, held on October 3, 2003, be approved. CARRIED ______

CORRESPONDENCE

(a) A letter dated October 27, 2003, from J. Patrick Howe, President, North Rosedale Ratepayers Association, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report.

(b) A letter dated November 12, 2003, from Leo Longo, Solicitor, Aird & Berlis LLP, in regards to item 7.1 - Hearing Report.

652 RES.#B147/03 - CORRESPONDENCE

Moved by: Irene Jones Seconded by: Jim McMaster

THAT above-noted correspondence (a) and (b) be received. CARRIED

653 CORRESPONDENCE (A)

October 27, 2003

FAX: (416) 667.6270 Attention: Kathy Stranks

Dick O'Brien Chair Toronto & Region Conservation Authority 5 Shoreham Drive Downsview, Ontario M3N 154 Canada Re: 119R Glen Road Dear Mr. O'Brien:

I am writing in my capacity as President of the North Rosedale Ratepayers Association and on behalf of the NRRA Board of Directors.

Our association has been in continued operation for more than 70 years. We represent the area bounded by Mount Pleasant Avenue (on the west), the CPR tracks on the north, and The Rosedale-Moore Park Ravine on the east and west. There are more than 800 residences in our area, mostly single-family homes that date back to as early as the turn of the 20th century.

North Rosedale is a stable community that takes pride in its heritage. Over the years, this association has worked hard to protect vital aspects and features of its community. Among its consistent activities over the years, the NRRA has fought to preserve the ravines that provide borders for its eastern and southern extremities. The natural state of these ravines helps create a unique community and is one of Our most distinctive features. The current NRRA Board of Directors is determined to continue with that position and thus opposes any attempt to build in any part of the ravine.

The NRRA fully supports the continuing efforts of the homeowners on Glen Road and Bin-Scarth Road to oppose the application from Mr. Derek Russell to build in an area of the ravine known municipally as 119R Glen Road. I understand that Mr. Russell's application for permission to build a residential structure is to be considered at a meeting of the TRCA on November 7th.

6 Edgar Avenue, Toronto, ON M4W 2A9 Tel: 416-925-2037 Fax: 416-925-4704 www.north-rosedale.org 654 2......

I further understand that Mr. Russell purchased this property, which is located within the ravine, more than 10 years ago. Since that time, I am told that neighbors adjacent to Mr. Russell's propel1y have expended significant amounts in legal and other costs in opposition to Mr. Russell's plans. The NRRA supports their continued opposition to this proposal.

On behalf of the NRRA Board, I urge you to turn down this application and maintain the ravines surrounding our community in their natural state.

Yours sincerely

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

J. Patrick Howe NRRA President cc. Mr. And Mrs. John McFadyen

655 CORRESPONDENCE (B)

656 ______

657 HEARING PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 RES.#B148/03

Moved by: Jim McMaster Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THAT the Committee sit as a Hearing Board. CARRIED MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING: Maria Augimeri Member Michael Di Biase Member Irene Jones Member Jim McMaster Vice Chair Dick O'Brien Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor Member

Following the roll call, a hearing was held re:

Application #029/03/Tor to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area for the Don River Derek Russell, 119R Glenn Road.

RES.#B149/03

Moved by: Irene Jones Seconded by: Jim McMaster

THAT the deputation time of Mr. John Inglis be extended to 8 minutes and the applicant, Ms. Tina Russell be allowed to speak for 3 minutes. CARRIED The applicant has applied to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), under Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area and within a well defined valley to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling.

A written staff report was submitted and a presentation was made by Mr. Russel White, Senior Planner, Development Services Section.

A presentation was made by Mr. John Inglis, Solicitor, McCarthy Tétrault LLP and Ms. Tina Russell.

The Board asked questions of staff and the applicant/representative.

RES.#B150/03

Moved by: Irene Jones Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session. CARRIED

658 RES.#B151/03

Moved by: Maria Augimeri Seconded by: Irene Jones

THAT the Hearing Board arise and report from closed session. CARRIED DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD RES.#B152/03

Moved by: Jim McMaster Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THAT the unique Application #029/03/Tor by Derek Russell pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area and within a well defined valley of the Don River, described as 119R Glenn Road, City of Toronto, be approved;

AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to ensure that the conservation easement which forms part of the application and submissions today by the applicant be registered on title and that it contain provisions to ensure that no additions or additional buildings are to be constructed on the property and that the vegetation management plan be implemented to the satisfaction of the TRCA. CARRIED MOTION TO RECONVENE RES.#B153/03

Moved by: Irene Jones Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT Executive Committee Meeting #10/03 reconvene. CARRIED MOTION TO RATIFY RES.#B154/03

Moved by: Irene Jones Seconded by: Jim McMaster

659 BACKGROUND Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, written permission is required from the TRCA to:

(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a regional storm;

(b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places;

(c) straighten, change or divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek stream or watercourse.

A permit may be refused if, in the opinion of the TRCA, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected. Before refusing permission, the TRCA must hold a Hearing to which the applicant and other interested persons are a party. In this instance, TRCA staff are of the opinion that the conservation of land will be affected.

This proposal was the subject of a lengthy Ontario Municipal Board Hearing. The initial decision of the Board dismissed the applicant's appeal. Part of the consideration which resulted in this dismissal included testimony from Barry Knox of the TRCA. The Board in this initial written decision, recognized that an application to the TRCA had not been made at the time of the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing. The Board dealt with the matter of concurrent jurisdictions (OMB and Mining and Lands Commissioner) and noted "that TRCA's approval constitutes applicable law, in that a fill Regulation 158 is a possible barrier to obtaining a building permit". The applicants did not choose to submit an application under Ontario Regulation 158 until matters before the Ontario Municipal Board were finalized.

The initial Ontario Municipal Board decision was the subject of a rehearing. The rehearing decision allowed the appeals and rescinded the original decision of denial on the application. This decision of the Ontario Municipal Board was also upheld by the Court of Appeal. Part of the consideration for this decision and the only reference to TRCA in the reversal cited that "it was submitted that the panel member (in the original board decision) speculated on whether a fill permit could be had pursuant to the authority." The final decision of the Board supports the applicant's proposal, however it is staff opinion that both decisions of the Ontario Municipal Board recognize the TRCA's total independence to deal with a permit made under Ontario Regulation 158, the subject of this report.

660 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the east side of Glenn Road, north of Bloor Street in the City of Toronto and is accessed via a narrow laneway between occupied residential tableland lots. The existing narrow laneway leads to a detached garage and coach house on the neighboring tableland properties. The laneway abuts the head of a tributary ravine of the Don River. At that location the laneway is supported by a 3 metre filled embankment. The embankment is at a 1:1 slope. The valley continues at the bottom of the embankment gradually dropping in elevation to the main Don River. Within this valley and just downstream of the proposed development is a well defined watercourse. The watercourse and tributary valley have been altered historically, as is evident through the laneway embankment, retaining wall supports from the adjacent coach house and through existing remnants of past garden uses (ie. historical rock garden and standpipe) within the valley. These encroachments are historical as the valley floor and laneway embankment is now heavily vegetated with a variety of mature woody species, some of which are non native. The site is not within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The forested ravine forms a continuum of natural cover with the main valley and other tributary ravines (especially to the south). Biological inventory work conducted as part of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program has identified a number of forest birds and plants of concern within this larger context.

PROPOSAL The proposal is to regrade within the Fill Regulated Area and within this tributary valley of the Don River in order to construct a detached single family residential dwelling with a detached 2 garage. The square footage of the proposed dwelling is approximately 4000 sq ft (371 m ). The garage is approximately 200 sq ft. The building footprint will cover approximately 7.75% of the 2 1.2 acre (4795.19m ) lot of record. The building will be built on cassions. The location of the garage will be filled to match grade with the existing laneway.

Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program The TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSMCP) establishes development guidelines for properties affected by valley corridors. The overall objective of the VSMCP policies is to prevent development from occurring within areas which may introduce risk to life and property associated with flooding and erosion, and slope instability or that is not compatible with the protection of these areas in a natural state. The boundaries of a valley corridor are determined as follows:

* If the valley slope is stable a minimum of 10 metres from the top of the valley bank.

* If the valley slope is not stable, a minimum of 10 metres from the predicted long term stable slope projected from the existing stable/stabilized toe (base) of slope, or the predicted location of the toe of slope as shifted as a result of stream erosion over a 100 year period.

661 The applicant has provided a geotechnical report and it is confirmed through the report that the proposed dwelling can be designed not to have an impact on slope stability. However, the existing landform would be altered through regrading and the placement of fill material. The applicant's proposal is to construct a garage immediately adjacent to the laneway with a proposed stairway to a dwelling to be located on a sloping valley floor. The applicant is proposing to remove as little vegetation as possible and presents this as an opportunity to conduct a stewardship effort which would result in the elimination of some non native vegetation with the possibility of a longer term net gain to the natural system. The applicant also promotes this development as an infill development and argues that the proposal should be allowed as it is consistent with TRCA policies.

The TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program notes under Section 4.2.2 Development and Redevelopment Intensification within Highly Urbanized Areas that:

New Lot development including all buildings and structures and associated private servicing, or comparable intensification shall not be permitted within valley corridors that have not been designated as a Special Policy Area. Section 4.2.2 (G) states that where there is an existing lot of record small lot only, eg. single family residential is vacant and is between existing developed urban lots, a new structure or building may be permitted provided the new development, its construction and any associated private servicing requirements: i) are consistent with existing primary building setback within the corridor reach; ii) are not located within the Regulatory Floodplain; iii) are not located on a valley wall; iv) are not located within the active erosion zone of an unstable valley slope; v) will not create or aggravate erosion or slope instability on adjacent upstream and downstream properties; vi) are not located within an active erosion zone of a watercourse determined to be:

within 10m of a stable river bank(measured from the top of the river bank) within 20m of an unstable river bank. An unstable river bank may be permitted to stabilized provided the proposed stabilization works are consistent with section 3-Watercourses; vii) minimize any impacts on the vegetation communities or functions or structure of the riparian habitat; viii) minimize potential impacts on the function or structure of the riparian habitat; ix) include sediment and erosion control during construction and subsequent phases until such time as erodible areas have been vegetated/stabilized; x) are consistent with municipal policies and standards including setbacks and grading, while achieving all of the above.

662 TRCA staff are of the opinion that this property is not an infill property as it is not between two lots of record as the policy definition states, but is the only property within this corridor which is entirely located within the valley. Further, if the property were to be considered infill the tests for development on infill properties (as noted above) exclude this proposal as a proposed dwelling would be constructed entirely below the top of bank (partially on a valley wall and partially on a sloping valley floor) and the setbacks from the valley will not be consistent with existing established development. Further, any development of this lot will not meet the TRCA's objective to protect valley lands and their habitat functions which is one of the overriding principles of the TRCA's programs.

The applicant promotes that this project has the benefit of enhancing a degraded condition on the slope and within the valleylands caused by historical changes to grade and the existence of non native vegetation. This condition exists in most, if not all, valleys within the City of Toronto. Historically, valley systems were used for garbage disposal, for private gardens and other obtrusive activities which are inconsistent with the objective of protecting and enhancing the features and their functions. Current environmental practices as envisioned in TRCA and City of Toronto documents (ie. Forty Steps to a New Don) focus on enhancing the valleyland conditions through vegetation management programs which exclude the construction of structures. The proposed footprint of a residence and garage is not a measure of enhancement promoted through the various enhancement programs.

Specifically, the applicant has provided an environmental report to support the proposal. In staff's opinion the report is not an environmental impact assessment and the recommendations are based on the assumption that development within the forested lands and upper end of the ravine is a given. It describes the vegetation communities but does not address fauna or specific wildlife habitat values. The report stresses the negative influences that have occurred with previous development activities (ie. garden sheds, gazebos) and promotes that this development will be different.

TRCA's natural heritage inventory work has shown that this ravine, in concert with the ravine to the south and the main valley of the Don River, support several forest bird species of concern. While these species may be common in more rural areas, they are of concern in urbanized areas as a result of negative influences to their habitat associated with urban areas. These impacts include direct losses as well as light, noise and encroachment from human contact. TRCA's information shows that the area is functioning at a high level given its urban context. The proposal calls for the removal of many non native overstorey species and non native ground cover which is a loss to the overall habitat value of the area. While TRCA staff support the principle of conversion to native forest species, in this instance, the actual removals will cause damage and openings in the forest canopy and thus could impact on the species of concern and could provide conditions for other invasive plant species to take hold. The existing values are not easily replaced.

663 The stewardship of the remaining forested areas of the ravine does not address the overall losses to the functioning of the ravine ecosystem. It would be expected that the negative influences of a new residence due to the closer proximity would be felt further into the forested ravine, even with the implementation of a stewardship plan. The application of stewardship recommendations for portions of the forest while potentially beneficial does not justify the removal of the upper part of the valley and forest to construct the residence.

In assessing cumulative impacts, the proposal is not supported by policy because it contributes to the impact created by cumulative loss and degradation of natural areas and biodiversity within the City of Toronto and TRCA jurisdiction. The allowance of this intrusion could establish a precedent which may potentially lead to similar proposals within the City of Toronto and elsewhere within the Authority's jurisdiction given the conditions of some of the valley corridors and the general and constant pressure for more intensification.

SUMMARY The applicants have worked with TRCA staff to understand our perspective and in an effort to address our concerns. However, the proposal will result in additional intrusions into a regenerating valley system using past practices as the reason for this additional intrusion and citing the possibility of environmental improvements. Environmental improvement would not occur through the reduction in the amount of natural area which could be available in the longer term. The makeup of the vegetation community within this valley can change over time with proper management on and beyond this property boundary. The land available for regeneration will change forever once the house is constructed. Regeneration of valleys through loss of overall area for regeneration is not consistent with the TRCA policy objectives and does not meet the test of conservation of land.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that the application be refused as it will affect the conservation of land in the following ways: z it reduces the land area that is available for the ongoing regeneration and enhancement objectives; z it has a detrimental impact due to the cumulative loss of natural cover within the City of Toronto and creates a precedent for future consideration of similar proposals within TRCA's area of jurisdiction; z it does not comply with the overall objective of the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program, and in particular, does not recognize Section 3 Valleyland definitions for protection and Section 4.2.1 Development within Established Urban Areas; z it has an overall negative effect on the conservation of land.

Report prepared by: Russel White, extension 5306 For Information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 1, 2003 Attachments: 1

664 Attachment 1

______665 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION

RES.#B155/03 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Rouge River Watershed Tormina Construction (Richmond Hill) Limited, CFN 34776. Purchase of property located south of Elgin Mills Road East, west of Leslie Street, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001-2005." Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed.

Moved by: Jim McMaster Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.42 hectares (1.04 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Tormina Construction (Richmond Hill) Limited, being Part of Lot 25, Concession 2 and designated as Block 25 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by J. D. Barnes Ltd. Surveyors under their Reference No. 02-21-845-00-Phase 1, dated June 13, 2003, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located south of Elgin Mills Road East, west of Leslie Street;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

THAT Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid;

AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution # A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.

Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's agent, Ms. Anna G. Carnovale of Manorheights Management Inc.

The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the property.

Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.

666 RATIONALE The subject property falls within The TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River Watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001-2005. The lands are comprised of a stream corridor found along the headwaters of the Rouge River and are located within the Rouge Park North Management Plan area.

TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-11.

Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 and Ron Dewell. extension 5245 Date: October 31, 2003 Attachments: 1

667 Attachment 1

______668 RES.#B156/03 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Humber River Watershed Ballymore Development (Wolfson) Corporation, CFN 34740. Purchase of property located on the south side of Snively Street, west of Bayview Avenue, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001-2005." Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Humber River Watershed.

Moved by: Jim McMaster Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.40 hectares (0.99 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Ballymore Development (Wolfson) Corporation, being Lots 19 and 21 and Part of Lot 20, Plan 200 and designated as Blocks 48 and 49 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by J. D. Barnes Ltd. Surveyors under their Reference No. 02-21-840-00, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, located on the south side of Snively Street, west of Bayview Avenue;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land required free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approved the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.

Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's lawyer, Mr. Sidney Lubelsky of Brown, Peck & Lubelsky, Barristers and Solicitors.

The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the property.

Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.

669 RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Humber River Watershed as outlined in the approved Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001-2005. The lands are designated Environmental Protection Area 2 (EPA) in the Town of Richmond Hill's Official Plan Amendment No. 129 and serve as a vegetative buffer to the local Class 3 Provincially Significant Wetland Complexes (Forester Marsh to the east and Snively Street Wetland Complex to the west).

TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the lands be turned over to the Town of Richmond Hill for management.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-11.

Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 and Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: November 03, 2003 Attachments: 1

670 Attachment 1

______

671 RES.#B157/03 - NATURAL HERITAGE LANDS PROTECTION AND ACQUISITION PROJECT 2001-2005 Flood Plain and Conservation Component / Rouge River Watershed Autumn Grove Builders Limited, CFN 34820. Purchase of property and acquisition of a conservation easement located south of Jefferson Sideroad, west of Yonge Street, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project 2001-2005", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Rouge River Watershed.

Moved by: Jim McMaster Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 14.02 hectares (34.64 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Autumn Grove Builders Limited, being Part of Lots 58 and 59, Concession 1 WYS, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York and designated as Blocks 240, 242, 244, and 245 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by J. D. Barnes Ltd. Surveyors under their Reference No. 01-21-607-00-PHASE 2, dated April 16, 2003, located south of Jefferson Sideroad, west of Yonge Street;

THAT a conservation easement for the protection of the environmental features and functions containing 0.98 hectares (2.42 acres), more or less, of vacant land be purchased from Autumn Grove Builders Limited, said land being situate on Part of Lots 58 and 59, Concession 1 WYS, Town of Richmond Hill, Regional Municipality of York and designated as Parts 27-37, inclusive, and parts 40-88, inclusive, on a draft plan of survey prepared by J. D. Barnes Ltd. Surveyors under their Reference No. 01-21-607-11, located south of Jefferson Sideroad, west of Yonge Street;

THAT the purchase price be $2.00;

THAT The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements;

AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A231/00, Authority Meeting #9/00, October 27, 2000 approving the Natural Heritage Lands Protection and Acquisition Project.

672 Through the draft plan of subdivision review process, the owner is required to transfer the valley corridor lands and grant a conservation easement over the rear 10 metres of 61 lots within the subdivision. The subject lots back onto the open space valley / stream corridor Blocks that are to be acquired by the TRCA; the conservation easement will have the effect of prohibiting all structures and placement of fill on this portion of the lots and will act as a vegetated buffer between the residential development and the valley lands.

Negotiations have been conducted with the owner's lawyer, Mr. Herb Wisebrod of Bratty and Partners, LLP, Barristers and Solicitors.

The Acting Director of the Watershed Management Division has reviewed the proposal and is in concurrence with the purchase of the property.

Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands.

RATIONALE The subject property falls within the TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Rouge River Watershed. The lands are comprised of valley / stream corridors found along the headwaters of the Rouge River, within the Oak Ridges Moraine, and are situated within the Rouge Park North Management Plan area.

TAXES AND MAINTENANCE It is proposed that the land be turned over top the Town of Richmond Hill for management.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 004-11.

Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 and Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: November 04, 2003 Attachments: 1

673 Attachment 1

______

674 RES.#B158/03 - THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Conveyance of Land for the Widening of Islington Avenue, between Rutherford Road and Major Mackenzie Drive, City of Vaughan Humber River Watershed, CFN 34529. Request from the Regional Municipality of York for conveyance of land for the widening of Islington Avenue, between Rutherford Road and Major Mackenzie Drive in the City of Vaughan.

Moved by: Jim McMaster Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Regional Municipality of York to convey certain lands for the widening of Islington Avenue, between Rutherford Road and Major Mackenzie Drive in the City of Vaughan;

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the TRCA that it is in the best interest of the TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Regional Municipality of York in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA owned land containing 0.12 hectares (0.30 acres), more or less, be conveyed to The Regional Municipality of York for the widening of Islington Avenue, said land being Part of Lots 16 and 17, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, designated as Part 2 on Reference Plan 65R-25716;

THAT consideration is to be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs;

THAT an archaeological investigation is to be conducted by TRCA Cultural Heritage staff before any site disturbance with any mitigative measures required is to be carried out all at the expense of the Regional Municipality of York;

THAT the conveyance of land be subject to a landscaping plan, subject to the approval of TRCA staff at the expense of the Regional Municipality of York;

THAT the Regional Municipality of York is to fully indemnify and save harmless the TRCA from any and all claims for injuries, damages, or loss of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this sale or the carrying out of construction;

THAT said conveyance is subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended;

675 AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The subject lands form part of a larger acreage acquired by the TRCA from R. H. Barker on October 1, 1964 under the Boyd Dam and Reservoir Project. The Regional Municipality of York has conveyed lands to the TRCA over the years for nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that these lands be conveyed for the nominal consideration of $2.00.

A plan illustrating the fee simple conveyance location is attached.

The widening of Islington Avenue will impact both the TRCA's property line fence and vegetation along the east side of Islington Avenue, north of Rutherford Road. To address these impacts, the Region has agreed to construct a fence along the new property line and replace vegetation removed during construction, subject to TRCA staff approval.

Plantings As part of the terms and conditions of the conveyance, the Regional Municipality of York must submit a landscaping plan for TRCA staff review and approval, and implement the plan utilizing native, woody and herbaceous plantings.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Regional Municipality of York has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction.

Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 and Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: November 04, 2003 Attachments: 1

676 Attachment 1

______

677 RES.#B159/03 - BELL CANADA Request for Permanent Easement for an Above Ground Telecommunications Cabinet, Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, CFN 34273. Request from Bell Canada to provide a permanent easement for an above ground telecommunications cabinet, on the east side of Islington Avenue, north of Rutherford Road (south of the entrance to 9751 Canada Company Avenue), Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York.

Moved by: Jim McMaster Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from Bell Canada to provide a permanent easement for an above ground telecommunications cabinet, on the east side of Islington Avenue, north of Rutherford Road (south of the entrance to 9751 Canada Company Avenue), Humber River Watershed, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York;

AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of the TRCA that it is in the best interests of the TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with Bell Canada in this instance;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing a total of 0.008 hectares (0.020 acres), more or less, be granted to Bell Canada for a telecommunications cabinet, said land being Part of Lot 18, Concession 7, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York as shown on a drawing prepared by Bell Canada and described as Plan 701;

THAT the TRCA grant the easement across the subject land on the following terms and conditions:

(a) the easement price is to be the sum of $10,000.00;

(b) Bell Canada is to pay all TRCA legal, appraisal, survey and other costs incurred to complete the transaction;

(c) Bell Canada is to fully indemnify the TRCA from any and all claims for injuries, damages, or costs of any nature, resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from the granting of this conveyance or carrying out the construction;

(d) Bell Canada is to submit a landscaping plan, subject to the approval of TRCA staff, and Bell Canada will undertake the landscape work at their expense;

(e) any additional conditions as deemed appropriate by the TRCA solicitor.

678 THAT an archaeological investigation is to be conducted by TRCA Cultural Heritage staff before any site disturbance with any mitigative measures required to be carried out all at the expense of Bell Canada;

THAT said easement be subject to the approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended;

THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the execution of any documents;

AND FURTHER THAT Resolution #A185/03 of Authority Meeting #7/03 held on September 26, 2003 be rescinded and replaced with the above recommendation. CARRIED BACKGROUND The subject property was acquired from Floyd W. Farr on October 1, 1964 under the Boyd Dam and Reservoir Project.

At Authority Meeting #8/03 held on October 31, 2003, TRCA approved a recommendation by TRCA staff for a fee simple conveyance of land for an above ground telecommunications cabinet. Instead of a fee simple conveyance, Bell Canada has now formally requested a permanent easement over certain TRCA lands for the construction of an above ground telecommunications cabinet, which will provide upgraded services in this developing area in the City of Vaughan. The location of the proposed structure will be situated along the fence line, 3.5 metres south of the entrance to TRCA property municipally described as 9751 Canada Company Avenue; this driveway continues eastward from the entrance to the Boyd Field Centre off of Islington Avenue. The site is not located within the Regulatory Flood Plain nor the Regulation Fill Line.

In addition to the permanent easement, a temporary working easement may be required for construction access over the 3.5 metres south of the entrance driveway. However, Bell Canada prefers access from the Islington Avenue Right of Way and is presently in discussions with the Regional Municipality of York in this regard. TRCA staff will request a plan showing the limits of a temporary working easement if access from the Region of York-owned road allowance is not possible.

Plantings: As part of the terms and conditions of this conveyance, Bell Canada must submit a landscape plan for TRCA staff review and approval, and implement the plan utilizing native woody and herbaceous plant species to provide a vegetated screen around the proposed telecommunications cabinet.

A plan illustrating the permanent easement location is attached.

679 FINANCIAL DETAILS Bell Canada has agreed to pay $10,000.00 as compensation for the granting of this permanent easement and will assume all reasonable costs (i.e. legal, survey, landscaping, etc.) involved in completing this transaction.

Report prepared by: George Leja, extension 5342 For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension 5245 Date: August 22, 2003 Attachments: 1

680 Attachment 1

______

681 RES.#B160/03 - ASIAN LONGHORNED BEETLE (ALHB) Expenditures for the survey and eradication efforts in regards to the ALHB.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Dick O'Brien

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) be advised that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) expenditures to November 1, 2003 for staff support in deliminating the extent of infestation are $53,065.81;

THAT TRCA continue to provide staff to assist with the in-field survey's at a total estimated cost of $124,000 to the end of 2003;

THAT TRCA staff submit monthly invoices of expenses related to survey, removal and related costs;

THAT TRCA staff continue to assist in the development of the implementation plan and related activities including the removal of host trees and replacement with non-host trees in the affected area on a cost recovery basis;

THAT the federal and provincial governments be encouraged to provide additional funds to establish a tree replacement program as part of an integrated pest control and environmental management strategy;

AND FURTHER THAT the Ministry of Natural Resources, Region of York, City of Toronto and City of Vaughan be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND On September 4, 2003 an insect was found in the Steeles and Weston Road area which was subsequently confirmed by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency to be an Asian Longhorned Beetle. The ALHB is a quarantined pest regulated by Canada, and is the most significant/serious forest health issue in this area with potentially devastating effects, requiring aggressive action to control/eradicate.

It is believed that the insect came in via wooden packing material (skids, crates etc.) and the infestation may have orignated more than 6 years ago. Initial field surveys of ALHB infection indicate highest preference for Manitoba maple, followed by silver maple, norway maple, sugar maple, then on to other species. Noted on willow, poplar, also known to affect birch, alder, horsechesnut, locust and others.

At this time no infected trees have been found on TRCA property, however, infected trees have been found in close proximity to Black Creek Pioneer Village and Roundtree Park on the Humber. A site of infestation was identified on Riverdale Drive in the Thisletown area in the City of Toronto. This suggests that the Humber Valley, Bluehaven park area is very much at risk with all its Manitoba maple and willow. Surveys are being conducted in the valley in this area and will continue.

682 The CFIA launched a survey of more than 100 square kilometers of forest, and as of October 1, 2003, the beetle was found in three populations that have infested several trees in an area of six square kilometers. TRCA staff have assisted CFIA, along with the Region of York, City of Toronto and City of Vaughan with in-field surveying, as well as providing some mapping and data management advice/assistance. Staff are in regular contact with the CFIA, are participating on multi-agency sub-committees developing the operations program for eradication and the communcations programs, as well as attending briefing meetings and other information sessions. As the eradication program moves forward, TRCA may have more involvement in the actual removals.

The CFIA is implementing an aggressive campaign to control and eradicate this unwanted pest with the full cooperation of its partners. TRCA staff have committed approximately 12 staff for field surveys since the outbreak began. The cost to TRCA to November 1, 2003 is $53,065.81, with anticipated expenditures by the end of 2003 being $124,000, assuming continuation of the current levels of support.

The federal government has also launched an extensive public awareness campaign to educate residents about the beetle and the threat it poses. The need to prevent the movement of firewood, nursery stock, trees and branches from within the infested area is being stressed.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE To date, TRCA has re-assigned staff from other projects and retained some seasonal staff for the survey teams in order to deal with this infestation. Senior TRCA staff met with senior CFIA staff to deal with reimbursement concerns, and CFIA confirmed that they are obligated to pay for survey and removal costs incurred by all agencies involved. It was requested by CFIA that all agencies submit a letter to CFIA outlining costs to date and projected costs. Staff are currently completing this letter outlining the costs noted in this staff report. It was also determined that bi-weekly conference calls be conducted by senior staff of all agencies involved to discuss and communicate progress on funding issues.

Staff will begin to submit monthly invoices to CFIA for reimbursement. Regular review of invoices will ensure that reporting meets Treasury Board and/or CFIA reporting requirements before months of expenses are accumulated. Staff will also be requesting a letter of understanding from CFIA acknowledging TRCA costs and identifying that best efforts are underway by the Minister to secure subsequent funding for proposed control activities of the eradication program by the Treasury Board. The regular reporting process and the letter of understanding will ensure that a commitment for reimbursement of costs incurred by TRCA for ongoing surveys and removal efforts is confirmed, and will ensure there are no difficulties at the end of this process in reconciling the expenditures for the work carried out.

683 At a press conference held on November 12, 2003, Agriculture and Agri-Food Minister Lyle Vanclief outlined the action plan for eradication of the ALHB and indicated that tree removal on public property will commence within a few weeks, as survey work continues on private property in the subject area, prior to tree removal on private property. Minister Vanclief also advised that CFIA is pursuing emergency registration for new pesticides as one means of preventing the spread of the insect. The pesticide being considered is believed to be effective through application to trees outside the areas designated for removal as an additional line of defense against spreading of the infestation. The pesticide would not reduce the need for tree removal. The CFIA will collaborate with its partners on a multi-pronged approach to eradication and continue sharing scientific data with cooperating departments and agencies over the winter while the beetle is inactive.

Report prepared by: Kathy Stranks, extension 5264 For Information contact: Adele Freeman, extension 5238 Dena Lewis, extension 5225 Date: November 12, 2003

______

SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTION

RES.#B161/03 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Fill, Construction & Alteration to Waterway.. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158 written permission from the Authority is required to:

(a) construct any building or structure or permit any building or structure to be constructed in or on a pond or swamp or in any area susceptible to flooding during a Regional Storm; (b) place or dump fill or permit fill to be placed or dumped in the areas described in the schedules whether such fill is already located in or upon such area, or brought to or on such area from some other place or places; (c) straighten, change, divert or interfere in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream, or watercourse.

A permit may be refused through a Hearing Process, if in the opinion of the Authority, the conservation of land, control of flooding or pollution is affected.

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.1 - 9.1.34, with the exception of 9.1.3 - Ontario Power Generation), which are listed below. CARRIED

684 RES.#B162/03 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 9.1.3 - Ontario Power Generation

Moved by: Irene Jones Seconded by: Michael Di Biase

THAT a permit be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the application 9.1.3 - Ontario Power Generation, which is listed below. CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON

9.1.1 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (Castlemore Road between the Gore Road and McVean Drive), in the City of Brampton, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Brampton.

The purpose is to construct in a floodplain and place fill within a Fill Regulated area associated with the West Humber River in order to facilitate the construction of a new gasline along Castlemore Road, between Gore Road and McVean Drive in the City of Brampton.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Site Plan, Elevations and Construction Details (1st and 2nd Crossings), prepared by I. Pougatcheva, drawing no. 20-8179-03, drawing dated August 12, 2003, received by TRCA September 12, 2003. z Site Plan, Elevations and Construction Details (3rd Crossing), prepared by I. Pougatcheva, drawing no. 20-8179-03, drawing dated August 12, 2003, received by TRCA September 12, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal consists of minor excavating and replacing of fill and construction within a floodplain in order to facilitate the construction of a gasline adjacent to Castlemore Road, between Gore Road and McVean Drive as it crosses over three tributaries of the West Humber River (Salt Creek). The gasline will be constructed using directional bore method and will run a minimum of 1.5 metres below the river bottom. All works are to take place entirely within the road allowance of Castlemore Road.

Control of Flooding: No excavated material will be stockpiled within the regulatory floodplain, and all existing grades are to be maintained. There will be no impacts to the storage or conveyance of floodwaters associated with the proposed works.

685 Pollution: Sediment control fencing will be installed around the bore hole pits to prevent sedimentation of each watercourse. The excavated material will be stockpiled sufficiently away from the watercourse. All disturbed areas will be restored using native and non-invasive species. The sediment control fencing will remain until vegetation is established.

Conservation of Land: There are no in-stream works and the gasline will be installed a minimum of 1.5 metres below the bed of the watercourse. There are no fisheries or geotechnical concerns related to this project.

Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project. All areas disturbed will be restored with a native seed mix.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3. - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34682 Application #: 367/03/BRAM Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: November 5, 2003

CITY OF PICKERING

9.1.2 HYDRO ONE To alter a waterway on the Hydro One Right-of-Way at 2275 Fairport Road North, in the City of Pickering, Frenchman's Bay Watershed as located on the property owned by Hydro One.

The purpose is to alter a waterway in the Regional Storm Floodplain of Pine Creek, a tributary of Frenchman's Bay, in order to remove contaminated soils within the upper reach of the watercourse and to restore the channel.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Stormwater Ditch Remediation, Letter, prepared by John Monczka, Hydro One Networks Inc., dated October 31, 2003, received November 4, 2003. z Site Plan Utility Corridor R.O.W., Drawing No. 2, prepared by O'Connor Associates, dated November 3, 2003, received November 4, 2003. z Proposed Erosion Control Plan, Drawing No. 3, prepared by O'Connor Associates, dated November 3, 2003, received November 4, 2003. z Proposed Drainage Ditch Rehabilitation, Drawing No. 4, prepared by O'Connor Associates, dated November 3, 2003, received November 4, 2003.

686 z Landscape Plan for Creek Restoration, Drawing No. CHEW-DXS-15400-0001, prepared by Hydro One Network Services Inc., dated October 30, 2003, received November 4, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the alteration of the upper reach of Pine Creek, a tributary of Frenchman's Bay, in order to remove contaminated soils within the channel and to restore the channel to a natural state. On October 1, 2003, a Hydro One Transformer at Cherrywood Transfer Station on Fairport Road North (north of Finch, east of Fairport, west of Dixie) experienced an unexpected rupture that resulted in the spillage of non-PCB mineral oil into Pine Creek. While a majority of the oil was successfully contained after the spillage, some did migrate into Pine Creek and has impacted soil within the watercourse. The extent of the remediation work involves approximately 100 metres of the watercourse. Given the urgent nature of the work and impacts to the watercourse due to the spill, an Emergency Authorization was provided to the applicant to conduct the works, in advance of permit issuance. TRCA technical staff had reviewed details for the proposed works and was satisfied that all potential concerns had been addressed.

Control of Flooding: All work took place in the 'dry' with flows diverted around the work site. TRCA staff was satisfied that flood flows, up to the Regional Storm level, could be conveyed around the site through pumping. Contaminated soil material that was removed was replaced in kind and therefore would not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan was implemented and was maintained for the duration of the work in order to prevent the migration of sediment into the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: There were no geotechnical/slope stability issues associated with this project. Approximately 300 tonnes of contaminated soil was removed from the watercourse and was replaced with a suitable fill material. A single access corridor running the entire length of the site was created through the removal of vegetation to a width of 5 metres. TRCA staff was satisfied that minimal grubbing (removal of the tree and root system) would take place. However, the site is to be restored with native plantings in accordance TRCA requirements. Given the nature of the work within the watercourse, Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) approval was required for the proposed works. Prior to the issuance of Emergency Authorization, DFO approval was obtained.

Plantings All disturbed areas are to be planted and restored with native, non-invasive species as per TRCA requirements.

687 Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34836 Application #: 433/03/PICK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 4, 2003

9.1.3 ONTARIO POWER GENERATION To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, Concession 1 BFC, (1675 Montgomery Park Road), in the City of Pickering, Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Ontario Power Generation.

The purpose is to place fill in Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a floating, seasonal ice barrier across the cooling water intake channel of the Pickering Nuclear Power Plant.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z OPG Pickering Ice Barrier C. W. Intake Groin & Channel Plan Sections & Details, Drawing 0001, prepared by SNC Lavalin Engineers & Constructors, dated September 22, 2003, date revised October 23, 2003, date received October 27, 2003 z OPG Pickering Ice Barrier C. W. Intake Groin & Channel Site Plan, Drawing 0002, prepared by SNC Lavalin Engineers & Constructors, dated October 22, 2003, date received October 24, 2003

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in Fill Regulated Area along the Lake Ontario waterfront in order to facilitate the construction of a floating, seasonal ice barrier across the cooling water intake channel of the Pickering Nuclear Power Plant. Historically, ice formation has blocked the intake channel resulting in a reduced volume of cooling water for the safe operation of the facility. As additional units at the nuclear power plant are being brought back into service, the Ontario Power Generation is concerned that ice blockage of the Cooling Water Intake Channel may result in station impairment and forced station outage.

The ice barrier will be constructed of 18 timber rafts, creating a curved, single span boom that is attached to the existing armourstone groins by main boom cables. The boom will be located approximately 85 m north of the mouth of the intake channel, hence protecting the floating barrier from the full effects of the lake waves and winds. The ice barrier will be placed in the channel each fall and removed each spring.

688 Control of Flooding: TRCA Water Management Group staff is satisfied that the floating, seasonal barrier will not cause any impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: TRCA technical staff is satisfied that there are there are minimal pollution concerns related to the project and that sediment and erosion control measures are neither practical nor required as part of the proposal.

Conservation of Land: There are no significant natural features that will be negatively impacted by this project. Further, there are no geotechnical/slope stability concerns related to the proposal. As the barrier will be seasonal and floating, with a maximum depth of 18 inches, TRCA planning ecology staff is satisfied that there will be no impacts to fish passage. A Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans as the construction of the ice barrier will not cause a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat.

Plantings There are no natural features that will be negatively impacted by this proposal, hence additional compensatory plantings are not required.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34798 Application #: 405/03/PICK Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 29, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.4 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on Part Lot 12, Concession 6 WYS, Part Lot 27, Concession 8 FTH, (Albion Road bridge crossing near Weston Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to reconstruct the Albion Road bridge (north) over the Humber River that involves demolition of the existing bridge and replacement with a bicycle/pedestrian bridge on the existing rehabilitated footings.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing Nos. 159-S250-6 through -30, prepared by UMA Engineering Ltd., dated August 2003, revised on October 30, 2003 and received on October 31, 2003.

689 z Drawing No. 159-TS250-1, prepared by UMA Engineering Ltd., dated August 2003, revised on October 30, 2003 and received on October 31, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The City of Toronto proposes to replace the existing Albion Road (north ) bridge over the Humber River with a new bicycle/pedestrian bridge located on the existing, rehabilitated footings. The existing bridge is significantly deteriorated and the project is subject to an approved Municipal Class EA. No in-water works are proposed.

Control of Flooding: The works are not expected to impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters as the new bridge is attached to existing footings and the vertical and horizontal profiles will match those of the existing bridge.

Pollution: The contractor shall employ appropriate sediment retention methods to ensure no sediment is discharged into the watercourse. This will be achieved through the use of silt fencing.

Conservation of Land: Conservation of Land: The proposed works will not affect any existing significant natural features.

Plantings Plantings: All disturbed areas will be restored with an appropriate native seed mix.

Policy Guidelines: Policy Guidelines: The works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program

CFN: 34462 Application #: 243/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: July 7, 2003

9.1.5 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on (land at the end of Stephen Drive adjacent to the Humber River), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to construct a support structure; extend an existing storm sewer pipe; and construct a new headwall and energy dissipation structure.

690 The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing Number H-105, Sheets 1 and 2, Deteriorated Storm Sewer Outfall Rejuvenation, prepared by Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated August 2003 and received on October 30, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to eliminate erosion of a portion of the bank of the Humber River by extending an existing storm sewer pipe from the top of the bank to the toe of the bank; constructing a new support structure, headwall and splash pad to support the extension; and restoring the toe of the slope with native plantings.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works will significantly lower the outfall, and add an energy dissipation feature. Therefore, the proposed works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (coffer dam and discharge filter bag) will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: Construction access is unlikely to take place within the watercourse. However, any impacts to fish habitat will be mitigated through the use of erosion and sediment control measures and restoration of all disturbed areas. Riparian vegetation removed will be replaced and enhancement of the site will be achieved through the on-site planting of woody vegetation.

Plantings Additional native trees and shrubs will be planted on the toe of the slope.

Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34810 Application #: 414/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

691 9.1.6 LESLIE & ROBB CHASE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 261 & PART LOT 262, Block G, Plan 1582, (130 Baby Point Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Leslie & Robb Chase.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a new two-storey dwelling. The existing dwelling will be demolished..

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Site Plan, Basement Plans, Floor Plans, Section Plans, Elevation Plans, prepared by Guthrie Muscovitch Architects, dated August 23, 2003, received October 21, 2003

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The subject property is located adjacent to the Humber River and is located partially within a Fill Regulated Area. The proposed works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the construction of a new two storey dwelling. The proposed works are contained within the property boundary which is delineated by a chain linked fence. All works are setback in excess of 10 metres from the top of bank. Access to the site will be from the existing street with no disruption to the Humber River.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent valley system.

Conservation of Land: The proposed works are not expected to impact on any significant resource features. All works are sufficiently setback from the top of bank. There are no slope stability/geo-technical concerns associated with this project. No fisheries issues or impacts on riparian vegetation are anticipated.

Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions. Tree hoarding will be required as part of this project to protect the existing trees.

692 Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34797 Application #: 404/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 29, 2003

9.1.7 TORONTO CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD To alter a waterway on Lot 3, Kingsmill Range Reserve 1, (721 Royal York Road), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Toronto Catholic District School Board.

The purpose is to alter a waterway for the purpose of construction one storm sewer outfall as part of expansion of the car parking area.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing No. 203126-1, Site Servicing and Grading Plan, revised October 21, 2003, received October 23, 2003, prepared by EMC Group Limited. z Drawing No. L-1, Tree Inventory, Assessment and Restoration Plan, dated October 22, 2003, received October 23, 2003 prepared by Schollen & Company Inc. z Vegetation Inventory and Assessment Report/Restoration Plan - Storm Sewer, Outfall and Valley Corridor Buffer, prepared October 23, 2003, received October 23, 2003 prepared by Schollen & Company Inc.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal consists of constructing a new storm sewer outfall as part of the proposed building and parking lot expansion to the Bishop Allan Academy. The storm sewer outfall will direct storm water runoff from the proposed parking area at the north-west portion of the site to a tributary of the Mimico Creek located to the north of the subject property.

Control of Flooding: The development is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. All existing grades around the outfall will be maintained, and therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected by the proposal. In addition, a Stormceptor water treatment unit will be installed to enhance post development water quality prior to runoff entering the watercourse.

693 Pollution: A combination of silt fencing and a temporary dyke will control sedimentation during construction.

Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized/revegetated following construction. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works.

Plantings The applicant is proposing planting of native trees and shrubs adjacent to the valley as part of the overall site development.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34331 Application #: 162/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (HUMBER YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.8 CITY OF TORONTO To alter a waterway on Part Lot 37, 38, Concession 1 FTB, (Grenadier Pond - south shoreline), in the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to alter a waterway for the purpose of removing the concrete shore wall and providing a new sloped and naturalized shoreline.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing No. 1, Staging Plan, revised October 15, 2003, received on October 20, 2003, prepared by Terraprobe. z Drawing No. 2, Tree Preservation Plan, revised October 15, 2003, received on October 20, 2003, prepared by Terraprobe. z Drawing No. 3, Removals Plan, revised October 15, 2003, received on October 20, 2003, prepared by Terraprobe. z Drawing No. 4, Construction Plan, revised October 15, 2003, received on October 20, 2003, prepared by Terraprobe. z Drawing No. 5, Landscape Plan and Details, revised October 15, 2003, received on October 20, 2003, prepared by Terraprobe. z Drawing No. 6, Typical Sections, revised October 31, 2003, received on November 3, 2003, prepared by Terraprobe.

694 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal:

The proposal consists of removing the existing concrete lined shoreline and adjacent granular pathway and placing these materials into the pond in order to create a new sloping (naturalized) shoreline. Two existing storm water outlets would be extended further into the pond and oil/water interceptors will be added.

Control of Flooding:

The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: A sediment curtain is to be in-place during the sand placement at the downslope end of the shoreline.

Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized and revegetated following construction. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. There will be no impact to fisheries, and therefore, a Letter of Advise will be issued on behalf of DFO. The applicant has been advised that this project is subject to the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) warm water timing window and that all works must be completed between July 1 to March 31 of any given year, unless otherwise directed by MNR. The applicant has agreed to the MNR timing window.

Plantings All existing trees will be protected during construction and an extensive planting and restoration of new trees and shrubs will take place upon completion of the pond shoreline work.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing and Section 4.2.2 (E) Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34479 Application #: 264/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 31, 2003

695 9.1.9 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on (Edinborough Parkette at the rear of 102 Edinborough Court), in the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to repair the headwall of an existing storm sewer outfall structure and to install armourstone and a combination of round stone and rip rap to provide erosion protection below the outfall.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to -1 -1, -1 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing Number SPP-Y-1, Sheets 1 and 2, Deteriorated Storm Sewer Outfall Rejuvenation, prepared by Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated August 2003 and received on October 22, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to repair a deteriorated headwall of an existing storm sewer outfall structure and to install armourstone and a combination of round stone and rip rap to provide erosion protection and energy dissipation below the outfall.

Control of Flooding: No work is occurring within the watercourse. The proposed works will therefore maintain the existing channel profile and will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: No work is located within the watercourse and any impacts to fish habitat will be mitigated through the use of erosion control measures and restoration of all disturbed areas. Riparian vegetation removed will be replaced and enhancement of the site will be achieved through the on-site planting of woody vegetation.

Plantings Additional native trees and shrubs will be planted on both sides of the new erosion control measures.

Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

696 CFN: 34804 Application #: 408/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

9.1.10 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on (land located west of Union Street, south of Lavender Road adjacent to a channel draining to Humber River), in the City of Toronto (Humber York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to replace a deteriorated headwall with a new armourstone headwall; install a splash pad energy dissipation structure; and stabilize and restore the bank.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing Number H-17, Sheets 1 and 2, Deteriorated Storm Sewer Outfall Rejuvenation, prepared by Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated August 2003 and received on October 30, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to replace a deteriorated headwall with a new armourstone headwall, install a splash pad energy dissipation structure, and stabilize and restore the eroded bank with topsoil, native seed mix and an erosion blanket.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works will add a plunge pool and staggered armourstone as energy dissipation features and retain the existing channel profile. Therefore, the proposed works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (coffer dam and discharge filter bag) will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: Construction access will take place within the watercourse. However, any impacts to fish habitat will be mitigated through the use of erosion and sediment control measures and restoration of all disturbed areas. Riparian vegetation removed will be replaced and enhancement of the site will be achieved through the on-site planting of woody vegetation.

Plantings Additional native trees and shrubs will be planted on the valley slope. 697 Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34808 Application #: 412/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (MIDTOWN COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.11 K. P. ISBERG CONSTRUCTION INC. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 8, Concession 2, 49 Country Lane, in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by K. P. Isberg Construction Inc..

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Wilket Creek, a tributary of the Don River and to alter a waterway to facilitate the construction of a storm outfall structure within the Regional Storm Floodplain.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2008 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Country Lane Subdivision Grading & Sediment Control Plan, Sheet No. 2, prepared by Anton Kikas Limited, dated May 2003, received November 4, 2003. z Country Lane - Plan and Profile, Sheet No. 3, prepared by Anton Kikas Limited, dated May 2003, received November 4, 2003. z Country Lane Subdivision Details, prepared by Anton Kikas Limited, dated May 2003, received November 4, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of Wilket Creek, a tributary of the Don River and alteration of the watercourse in order to construct a storm sewer outfall structure within the Regional Storm Floodplain. The storm water outfall structure will manage runoff from the adjacent plan of subdivision (total of five residential lots). The subject property is located partially within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain of Wilket Creek. The site is located at the east end of Country Lane within the Bridle Path community. The storm sewer will be installed through a 5.0m easement on the eastern most lot on the subject property and will outlet to the floor of the Wilket Creek Valley (approximately 15 m away from the watercourse). To minimize the disturbance to the valley wall and existing vegetation, the east leg of the storm sewer will be directional drilled to the proposed headwall location.

698 Control of Flooding: The storm sewer which will direct stormwater runoff from the subject site will be installed under the valley wall. TRCA Water Management Group staff has reviewed details relating to the storm sewer and the outfall structure and is satisfied that it will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood water.

Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed along the top of bank of the Wilket Creek valley while a snow fence will be placed along the north limit of Country Lane to protect existing trees. Erosion and sediment control measures will be regularly monitored and maintained as necessary to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is approximately 15 metres away. Stormwater quality controls will also be implemented for the adjacent subdivision including reduced lot grading, roof leader discharge to ground and sump pumping of foundation drains and grassed swales. These details have been reviewed and approved by TRCA Water Management Group staff as part of the plan of subdivision.

Conservation of Land: The storm sewer pipe will be directional drilled and will not affect existing vegetation on the adjacent valley slope. There are no geotechnical/slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. As the storm outfall is located approximately 15 metres from the watercourse, a Letter of Advice from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) will be issued prior to the release of the permit. There will be no impacts to other significant resource features.

Plantings Six coniferous trees and sixty-nine deciduous shrubs will be planted in the area of the storm outfall, at the bottom of the valley floor.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34834 Application #: 431/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 Date: November 4, 2003

9.1.12 LORNE ROSE To construct in a flood plain on Part Block B, Plan 4068, (88 Plymbridge Road), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Rostek Homes.

The purpose is to construct a new two-storey dwelling, swimming pool, and waterfall within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA).

699 The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Revised Construction Notes, Site Plan and Statistics Drawing No. A1 (received November 3, 2003), Basement Plans, Ground Floor Plans, Second Floor Plans, Roof Plans Drawing No. A2-A5, Front Elevation Plans, Rear Elevation Plans, East Elevation Plans, West Elevation Plans A6-A9, Building Section Plans Drawing No. A10, Revised Construction Notes, prepared by Lorne Rose, dated September 19, 2003, received September 19, 2003

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill to facilitate the construction of a new two-storey dwelling, pool and waterfall within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Hoggs Hollow Special Policy Area (SPA). All works are contained within the area bounded by the existing retaining wall and do not encroach beyond the toe of the slope.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works meet the requirements for redevelopment in a Special Policy Area. The new dwelling is located outside of the Regional Floodline elevation. All excess fill material will be removed from the site.

Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed before commencement of the work and will be maintained until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized.

Conservation of Land: There are no slope stability/geo-technical issues associated with this project and there will be no impact on significant resource features, fisheries or riparian vegetation.

Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions. Extensive tree hoarding will be done to protect the existing trees.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34635 Application #: 353/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: September 23, 2003

700 9.1.13 CAP REIT To alter a waterway on Part Lot 13, Concession 2 EYS, (44 Stubbs Drive), in the City of Toronto (Midtown Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Cap Reit.

The purpose is to alter a watercourse for the purpose of structural reinforcement of an existing concrete encased sanitary sewer (private service) crossing of Viner Creek.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Redlined Drawing No. SP, Site Plan, revised July 17, 2003, received July 21, 2003, prepared by Al Underhill and Associates Ltd. z Drawing No S1, Plans, Notes and Details, revised July 18, 2003, received October 29, 2003, prepared by RWB Engineering Ltd.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The applicant proposes to alter a watercourse for the purpose of structural reinforcement of an existing concrete encased sanitary sewer (private service) crossing of Viner creek. Reinforcement of the sewer crossing will be achieved by installing horizontal supports (cross beams) at the underside of the existing concrete encasement. Once the structural supports are completed, clean river run stone will be placed on the upstream and downstream sides of the sewer crossing. The existing sanitary sewer manhole located on the east side of the sewer crossing will be structurally reinforced with the use of sheet piling.

Control of Flooding: All new bank protection (armourstone) works will be limited to the an area approximately 10m east of the existing sewer where there has been active bank erosion. Therefore, there will be no negative impacts on storage or conveyance of flood water.

Pollution: A temporary creek dam will be installed to prevent the migration of construction generated sediment into the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized and revegetated following construction. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. There will be no impact to fisheries, and therefore, a Letter of Advise will be issued on behalf of DFO. The applicant has been advised that this project is subject to the Ministry of Natural Resource's (MNR) warm water timing window and that all works must be completed between July 1 and March 31 of any given year, unless otherwise directed by MNR. The applicant has agreed to the MNR timing window.

701 Plantings New native plantings are proposed for the area behind the proposed armourstone.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 33481 Application #: 345/02/TOR Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.14 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on Lot 11, Concession 3 WYS, (Wilson Avenue East of Jane Street at Black Creek), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the construction of a watermain crossing the Humber River by the directional bore method..

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Cross Section Drawing No. W-62 prepared by City of Toronto Emergency Works and Services, dated July 22, 2003, received September 2, 2003

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River to facilitate the construction of a 300 mm diameter watermain crossing by the directional bore method underneath the creekbed. The location of the project is east of Jane Street, on Wilson Avenue, across Black Creek Drive. The entry and exit excavations will be located away from the creek area.

Control of Flooding: No excavation material is to be stockpiled within the Regional Storm Floodplain and all existing grades are to be maintained. There are no anticipated impacts from the works on the storage or conveyance from flood waters.

702 Pollution: Silt fencing is located near the bore pit locations to impede the overland migration of construction generated sediments. Any dewatering shall take place in such a manner as to ensure that any pumped water will be directed to a sediment control device prior to discharge.

Conservation of Land: There are no instream works or impacts to riparian vegetation. The watermain crossing is 3 metres below the watercourse. The bore pit locations are setback from the top of bank. There are no geo-technical/slope stability issues associated with this project. There are no impacts on fisheries, natural features or riparian vegetation. On September 26, 2003, this Authority approved the request for a permanent easement across TRCA lands that is required for the construction of the watermain.

Plantings All excavated areas near the creek will be restored with sod and tree planting as required. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions.

Policy Guidelines: The works comply with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34555 Application #: 319/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: September 3, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.15 CULTURE AND TOURISM CITY OF TORONTO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To alter a waterway in Birkdale Park and Thomson Park, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by the City of Toronto.

The purpose is to remove two existing pedestrian bridges and install two new bridges within Birkdale Park and Thomson Park, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on property owned by the City of Toronto.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing No. BP-1, Pedestrian Bridge Over Highland Creek, Birkdale Park, General Arrangement, dated August 2003, received August 26, 2003, prepared by Giffels Associates Limited. z Drawing No. BP-2, Birkdale Park Pedestrian Bridge, Restoration Plan and Sections, revised October 29, 2003, received October 31, 2003, prepared by Giffels/Amec.

703 z Drawing No. TP-1, Pedestrian Bridge Over Highland Creek, Thomson Park, General Arrangement, dated August 2003, received August 26, 2003 prepared by Giffels Associates Limited. z Drawing No. TP-2, Thomson Park Pedestrian Bridge, Restoration Plan and Sections, revised October 29, 2003, received October 31, 2003, prepared by Giffels/Amec.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the removal of two existing pedestrian bridges (Birkdale and Thomson Parks) which are in need of significant structural repair and require replacement with new prefabricated steel bridges and new abutments. The new structures would be constructed at the same locations as the existing bridges.

Control of Flooding: The new bridge abutments will span Highland Creek and will be situated approximately 1.5m from top of bank at Thomson Park and along the top of bank in the case of Birkdale Park. The old abutments will be removed. The existing hydraulic cross-section of the channels will be improved as the new bridges are elevated higher than the existing ones. Thus, the proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of floodwater.

Pollution: A temporary creek dam will be installed to prevent the migration of construction generated sediment into the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: All filled and disturbed areas will be stabilized and revegetated following construction. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. There will be no impact to fisheries, and therefore, a Letter of Advise will be issued on behalf of DFO. The applicant has been advised that this project is subject to the Ministry of Natural Resource's (MNR) warm water timing window and that all works must be completed between July 1 to March 31 of any given year, unless otherwise directed by MNR. The applicant has agreed to the MNR timing window.

Plantings Vegetated rip rap (bioengineering-shrub material) will be utilized for several metres on either side of the new bridges to enhance riparian banks.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34551 Application #: 316/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Mark Rapus, extension 5259 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 31, 2003 704 9.1.16 NICK LAZARIDIS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 4, Plan 2546, (11 Colonel Danforth Trail), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Nick Lazaridis.

The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a Fill Regulated Area of the Highland Creek to facilitate the demolition of the existing garage on Lot 4 (9 Colonel Danforth Trail) and the existing house on Lot 5 (11 Colonel Danforth Trail) and the construction of a new single-family dwelling on each of the 2 lots.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Site Plan, Basement Floor, Ground Floor, Second Floor, Front Elevation, Side Elevations (2) and Rear Elevation Drawings, Drawing Nos. A1-A8, prepared by Alexander Boros Design Inc. dated July 2001, received September 30, 2003

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and replacement of fill in a regulated area to facilitate the demolition of the existing garage on Lot 4 (9 Colonel Danforth Trail) and the existing house on Lot 5 (11 Colonel Danforth Trail) and the construction of a new single-family residence on each of the 2 adjacent lots. Two permit applications have been submitted, one for each of the two lots, CFN 34816 for Lot 4 and CFN 34817 for Lot 5. This permit is a renewal for permit applications CFN 32583 and CFN 32584 as there is a new owner for the property.

Control of Flooding: The entire property is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the proposed works will have no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed directly behind the proposed works to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: The subject lots are located adjacent to Highland Creek, with top of bank of the valley slope traversing the rear portion of the lots. The proposed residences will maintain the same distance from the top of bank as the existing garage and house, being a minimum 12 metre setback from the garage on Lot 4 and a minimum 5.4 metre setback from the house on Lot 5, to the top of bank. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. There are no slope stability issues associated with this project as determined by a Slope Stability Evaluation by V.A. Wood Associates Limited, dated December 11, 2000. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation.

705 Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application.

Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (G) - Infilling- of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34817 Application #: 417/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 31, 2003

9.1.17 NICK LAZARIDIS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 4, Plan 2546, (9 Colonel Danforth Trail), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Nick Lazaridis.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Site Plan, Basement Floor, Ground Floor, Second Floor, Front Elevation, Side Elevations (2) and Rear Elevation Drawings, Drawing Nos. A1-A8, prepared by Alexander Boros Design Inc. dated July 2001, received September 30, 2003. z Site Servicing and Plan and Site Grading Plan Drawing No. SS-1, prepared by Politis Engineering Ltd., dated September 2003, received November 4, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and replacement of fill in a regulated area to facilitate the demolition of the existing garage on Lot 4 (9 Colonel Danforth Trail) and the existing house on Lot 5 (11 Colonel Danforth Trail) and the construction of a new single-family residence on each of the 2 adjacent lots. Two permit applications have been submitted, one for each of the two lots, CFN 34816 for Lot 4, and CFN 34817 for Lot 5. This permit is a renewal of permit applications CFN 32583 and CFN 32584 as there is a new owner for the property.

706 Control of Flooding: The entire property is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore the proposed works will have no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed directly behind the proposed works to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: The subjects lots are located adjacent to Highland Creek, with the top of bank of valley slope traversing the rear portion of the lots. The proposed residences will maintain the same distance from the top of the bank as the existing garage and house, being a minimum 12 metre setback from the garage on Lot 4 and a minimum 5.4 metre setback from the house on Lot 5, to the top of bank. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. There are no slope stability/geo-technical issues associated with this project as determined by a Slope Stability Evaluation by V.A. Wood Associates Limited, dated December 11, 2000. There will be no impact on significant natural features, fisheries or riparian vegetation.

Plantings The proposed works will not affect any natural features; therefore plantings are not required as part of this project.

Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2.2. (G) - Infilling - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34816 Application #: 418/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 31, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.18 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on (Dawes Road Parkette located east of Dawes Road Bridge on the south side of Massey Creek), in the City of Toronto (Toronto East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to repair the headwall of an existing storm sewer structure and to stabilize the bank by replacing the existing failed gabion baskets with armourstone.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit:

707 z Drawing Number MC-EY-4, Sheets 1 and 2, Deteriorated Storm Sewer Outfall Rejuvenation, prepared by Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated August 2003 and received on October 22, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to repair a deteriorated headwall of an existing storm sewer outfall structure; replace the existing failed gabion baskets downstream from the outfall with armourstone; and restore the eroded valley slope with round stone and native plantings.

Control of Flooding: The existing outfall structure will be restored at a location further back into the existing embankment, and the armourstone staggered to provide energy dissipation and a less obstructive channel profile. The proposed works will therefore maintain or improve the existing channel profile and will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (coffer dam and discharge filter bag) will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Plantings Additional native trees and shrubs will be planted on the valley slope.

Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34805 Application #: 409/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

9.1.19 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on (opposite Doris Drive, south of St. Clair Avenue East, on west side of Massey Creek), in the City of Toronto (Toronto East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

708 The purpose is to repair and protect an exposed sanitary sewer pipe; construct a new headwall structure for an existing culvert and an existing storm sewer outfall; restore the bank with armourstone and plantings; and install energy dissipation and erosion control measures.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing Number MC-EY-28, Sheets 1 (redlined), 2 (redlined) and 3, Deteriorated Storm Sewer Outfall Rejuvenation, prepared by Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated August 2003 and received on October 30, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to repair and protect an exposed sanitary sewer pipe, construct a new armourstone headwall structure for an existing culvert and an existing storm sewer outfall; replace the existing storm sewer outfall; restore eroded banks with staggered armourstone install a plunge pool and round stone energy dissipation and erosion control measures; and restore the top of the banks with native plantings. The design was previously approved for construction under the City of Toronto, Ministry of Natural Resources and TRCA's Emergency Works Protocol.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works will add a plunge pool, staggered armourstone and other energy dissipation features. The existing storm sewer outfall will be lowered by 1.9 metres. Therefore, the proposed works will not impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (coffer dam and discharge filter bag) will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Plantings Additional native trees and shrubs will be planted on the valley slope.

Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

709 CFN: 34806 Application #: 410/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

9.1.20 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on (south of Nesbitt Drive, west of Bayview Extension, east of CPR track), in the City of Toronto (Toronto East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to repair broken storm sewer pipes, construct a new armorstone headwall structure and energy dissipation measures, and stabilize and restore the bank.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing Number D-EY-12, Sheets 1 and 2, Deteriorated Storm Sewer Outfall Rejuvenation, prepared by Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated August 2003 and received on October 30, 2003

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to repair broken storm sewer pipes; replace a deteriorated headwall with a new armorstone headwall; install a splash pad energy dissipation structure; and stabilize and restore the bank with recycled gabion stone, topsoil and native plantings.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: No work is located within the watercourse. Vegetation removed will be replaced and enhancement of the site will be achieved through the on-site planting of woody vegetation.

Plantings Additional native trees and shrubs will be planted on both sides of the new erosion control measures.

710 Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34807 Application #: 411/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

9.1.21 CITY OF TORONTO To construct in a flood plain on (David A. Balfour Park on the west side of Yellow Creek, south of St. Clair Avenue and east of Avoca Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Toronto East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto.

The purpose is to construct a new headwall structure for an existing storm sewer outfall; restore and stabilize both banks with armourstone and plantings; and construct an energy dissipation and erosion control structure..

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Drawing Number D-48, Sheets 1 and 2 (both redlined), Deteriorated Storm Sewer Outfall Rejuvenation, prepared by Toronto Works and Emergency Services, dated August 2003 and received on October 30, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to stabilize an eroding bank along Yellow Creek to protect an existing pathway. The works include constructing a new armourstone headwall structure for an existing storm sewer outfall; replacing the existing failed gabion baskets on the west bank with armourstone and plantings; constructing a plunge pool to dissipate energy and reduce erosion; and stabilize and restore the highly eroded east bank with armourstone and plantings. The design was previously approved for construction under the City of Toronto, Ministry of Natural Resources and TRCA's Emergency Works Protocol.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works will add a plunge pool and staggered armourstone dissipate energy. Although the east bank will be restored with armourstone in order to protect the existing pathway, engineering calculations indicate that the proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

711 Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures (coffer dam and working mats) will be implemented and maintained during construction to prevent sedimentation of the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: Construction access will take place within the watercourse and the highly eroded east bank will be stabilized with armourstone. However, any impacts to fish habitat will be mitigated through the use of erosion and sediment control measures and restoration of all disturbed areas and additional renaturalisation on site . Riparian vegetation removed will be replaced and enhancement of the site will be achieved through the on-site planting of woody vegetation.

Plantings Additional native trees and shrubs will be planted on the valley slope.

Policy Guidelines: The proposed works are consistent with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34809 Application #: 413/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

9.1.22 P.S. PRODUCTION SERVICES To construct in a flood plain on Lot 91, 92, Plan 7607, (80 Commissioners Street), in the City of Toronto (Toronto East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation.

The purpose is to construct a 70 feet by 30 feet temporary storage shed within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Lower Don Special Policy Area (SPA).

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Site Plan - 80 Commissioners Street, prepared by PS Productions, dated January 1998, received September 18, 2003

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to construct a temporary storage shed within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Don River within the Lower Don SPA. The works involve construction within the existing parking lot of the subject property. The dimensions of the shed will be 70 feet by 30 feet and will sit on a concrete slab at grade.

712 Control of Flooding: The proposed shed will be above the Regional Storm Elevation. All excess fill material will be removed from the site.

Pollution: A sediment control fence will be installed during construction and will remain in place until the works have been completed and any exposed areas have been stabilized.

Conservation of Land: There are no slope stability/geo-technical issues associated with this project and there will be no impact on significant natural features. No fisheries issues or impacts on riparian vegetation are anticipated.

Plantings The proposed works will not affect any existing natural features; therefore, no plantings are required as part of this application.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 B) Development Guidelines for the Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas - of this Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34793 Application #: 402/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 28, 2003

CITY OF VAUGHAN

9.1.23 SABINO CATENACCI To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 12, Plan 2468, (2005 Highway 7), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Luigi Catenacci.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the replacement of a retaining wall within the Regional Storm Flood Plain, in the rear yard of an existing residential lot.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Site Plan, Drawing No. SK-0, prepared by Whitney~Bailey Associates Inc., dated September 22, 2003, received by the TRCA on October 27, 2003, redline revised to indicate sediment control fencing and removal of excess fill. z Section 'X', Drawing No. SK-1, prepared by Whitney~Bailey Associates Inc., dated September 22, 2003, received by the TRCA on October 08, 2003.

713 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The works involve excavating and placing fill to facilitate the replacement of an existing retaining wall within the Regional Storm Flood Plain. The works will be contained within the rear yard of an existing residential lot. Authority staff note that the existing retaining wall is failing and that the proposed works are required in order to reduce the risk to property damage and public safety. The new reinforced concrete retaining wall will be 6 feet above grade and 100 feet in length.

Control of Flooding: Existing grades will remain unchanged after the work is complete; therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected.

Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the adjacent watercourse. All disturbed areas will be restored.

Conservation of Land: Authority engineering staff have determined that the retaining wall has been appropriately designed and have no concerns with the proposed project. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project.

Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project.

Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 4.2.2 D) - Replacement Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34829 Application #: 428/03/VAUG Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: November 3, 2003

9.1.24 TERESA RANIERI To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 53, Plan 65M-2187, (18 St. Ives Court), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Angelo Puopolo.

714 The purpose is to remove and place fill to facilitate the construction of an addition onto a balcony at the rear of an existing residential home located within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Proposed Foundation Plan, 18 St. Ives Ct., Vaughan, Ontario, received by the TRCA on November 3, 2003. z Proposed Plan, Enclosed Basement Level of Existing Porch, 18 St. Ives Ct., Vaughan, Ontario, received by the TRCA on November 3, 2003. z Part East Elevation, received by the TRCA on November 3, 2003. z Section at East Wall, received by the TRCA on November 3, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The project involves the excavation and placement of fill to facilitate the construction of an addition onto an existing balcony. The balcony is situated at the rear of an existing residential home. The project will be sufficiently set back from the adjacent stable top of bank, and will not be located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain.

Control of Flooding: No impact to the storage or conveyance of flood waters is expected.

Pollution: No sedimentation is expected from the project, as the location of the proposed balcony addition is approximately 140 metres from the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical/slope stability issues associated with this project. As the watercourse will not be impacted by the proposal, no fisheries concerns will result. There are no other significant natural features on, or adjacent to, the site that may be negatively impacted by the project.

Plantings The project will not affect any significant natural features. All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions upon completion of the project.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

715 CFN: 34833 Application #: 430/03/VAUG Report Prepared by: Coreena Smith, extension For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: November 4, 2003

TOWN OF AJAX

9.1.25 H.A. HORNUNG INVESTMENTS LTD. To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 4, Concession Range 2, Part 1 Plan 40R-1670, Shoal Point Road, in the Town of Ajax, Carruthers Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by H.A. Hornung Investments Ltd..

The purpose is to remove fill material and woody debris in order to restore a portion of the shoreline of the Carruthers Creek Marsh within the Fill Regulated Area..

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Carruther's Creek Marsh Shoreline Restoration, Letter, prepared by C. Brad Peterson Environmental Management and Landscape Architecture, dated April 10, 2002, received September 19, 2002. z Carruther's Creek Marsh Shore Remediation, Letter, prepared by C. Brad Peterson Environmental Management and Landscape Architecture, dated May 8, 2003, received May 27, 2003. z Carruther's Creek Marsh Shoreline Remediation, Drawing No. 0001-M1, prepared by C. Brad Peterson Environmental Management and Landscape Architecture, dated May 6, 2003, received May 27, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The applicant proposes to remove fill material and woody debris which has been dumped on a portion of the shoreline of the Carruthers Creek Marsh. The works are within the Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain and are being conducted to resolve an outstanding violation under Ontario Regulation 158 (no charges pending). The material is being removed along a 70 metre section of the Carruthers Marsh. This portion is privately owned and is utilized as part of the side yard of an existing residence and shed structure. The removal of the debris and the restoration of the slope through the planting of shrub material will better the condition of the shoreline at the immediate location of the violation. TRCA staff are continuing to look at opportunities for improvements to the entire shoreline through planning applications submitted for the subject property. These applications are currently before the Ontario Municipal Board.

716 Control of Flooding: There will be no impact on the control of flooding as all material will be removed from the site resulting in additional floodplain storage.

Pollution: The removal of material is to be conducted during the winter months while the water level in the Carruthers Marsh is still low. This will also allow for sediment fencing to be erected between the proposed works and the existing water line thereby reducing impacts on the Marsh.

Conservation of Land: All disturbed areas will be planted with shrub material in the spring in accordance with plans submitted by the applicant.

Plantings An area of approximately 100 square metres will be seeded along the shoreline. Furthermore, 20 native shurbs will be planted as part of the remediation work.

Policy Guidelines: The restoration works are in compliance with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 33506 Application #: 370/02/AJAX Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 5, 2003.

TOWN OF CALEDON

9.1.26 MATTHEW LAPICCIRELLA To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 32, Plan 43M-1134, (29 Sunkist Valley Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Matthew Lapiccirella.

The purpose is to place fill within a regulated area of the Humber River on an existing residential lot at 29 Sunkist Valley Road in the Village of Bolton in order to construct a pool and associated patio on the subject property.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Site Plan, prepared by Matthew Lapiccirella, dated September 29, 2003, received by TRCA staff September 29, 2003. z Section and Elevation Plan, prepared by Matthew Lapiccirella, dated September 29, 2003, received by TRCA staff September 29, 2003. z Legal Survey, prepared by Young & Young Surveying Inc., dated August 17, 1994, received by TRCA staff September 29, 2003.

717 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal consists of excavating fill in order to facilitate the construction of a partially in-ground pool and associated deck and patio in the backyard of the subject property. The subject property is located entirely within the Fill Regulated Area, but outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. Engineering staff has no geotechnical concerns with the proposal.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.

Pollution: The subject property is located approximately 200 metres away from the nearest watercourse. The proposed works are sufficiently setback from the watercourse and sedimentation of the watercourse is not expected.

Conservation of Land: The property is located in an existing residential area in the Village of Bolton. The proposed swimming pool and associated deck and patio will not negatively impact upon any significant natural vegetation. Engineering staff has determined through site visit that there are no geotechnical concerns associated with this proposal. There are no fisheries related concerns associated with these works.

Plantings No significant vegetation is to be removed through this project.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34663 Application #: 364/03/CAL Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: November 5, 2003

TOWN OF MARKHAM

9.1.27 ANDREW MASON To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 11, Concession 6 Lot 7, Plan 401, 16 Maple Lane, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Andrew Mason.

718 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the demolition of an existing residence and the construction of a new replacement two-storey dwelling and detached two-car garage.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Red Line Revised Site Plan, prepared by Michael Hatch Designs Ltd., dated August 2003, received September 10, 2003. z Lot Drainage and House Siting Control Plan, prepared by R.G. McKibbon Limited, dated October 24, 2003, received October 28, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the demolition of an existing one-storey residence and the construction of a new two-storey replacement dwelling. The proposal also involves the construction of a new detached two-car garage. The subject property is located within the Fill Regulated Area and partially within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River. However, it is noted that the residence and associated garage will be located entirely outside the floodplain. The proposed residence is located on the north side of Maple Lane, east of Main Street Unionville and is sufficiently set back from the stream corridor.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affected the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the stream corridor and watercourse. The watercourse is located approximately 35 metres away.

Conservation of Land: The proposed residence is sufficiently set back from the stream corridor (in excess of 10 metres) and from the Regional Storm Floodplain. Furthermore, the proposed dwelling is located entirely on tableland and there are no geotechnical/slope stability issues associated with the new residence. TRCA staff conducted a site visit to the subject property and notes that the proposed residence will not impact any significant natural resource features and is consistent with existing development within the corridor reach.

Plantings Given its location being more than 10 metres away from the stream corridor, no plantings are required as part of this application.

719 Policy Guidelines: This project complies with Section 4.2.2(D) - Replacement Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34602 Application #: 340/03/MARK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: November 4, 2003.

9.1.28 CONNIE & BARRY PRENTICE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 28, Plan M-2017, 56 Aitken Circle, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Connie & Barry Prentice.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of an in-ground swimming pool at the rear of the existing residence.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of an in-ground swimming pool at the rear of the existing residence. The subject property is located within the Fill Regulated Area but outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Aitken Circle, south of 16th Avenue and west of Kennedy Road.

Control of Flooding: A topographic survey indicating the existing grades on the subject property was submitted. This survey confirms that the subject property is outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As the proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, the storage or conveyance of flood waters will not be affected.

Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the valley lands and watercourse. The watercourse is located approximately 139 metres away.

720 Conservation of Land: The proposed swimming pool will be located entirely on tableland and is sufficiently set back from the top of bank. TRCA staff conducted a site visit to the subject property and confirm that there are no geotechnical/slope stability issues and no fisheries impacts associated with the proposed works. Furthermore, no vegetation adjacent to or on the valley lands will be removed. No significant natural resource features will be impacted by the proposed development.

Plantings As the proposed works are located in the existing manicured portion of the rearyard and since no vegetation will be removed, no plantings are required as part of this application.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34823 Application #: 425/03/MARK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: November 4, 2003

9.1.29 CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MARKHAM To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain at Clark Avenue and Henderson Avenue, in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Corporation of the Town of Markham.

The purpose is to alter a waterway and construct a structure within the Regional Storm Floodplain of a tributary of the Don River to facilitate slope stabilization work along the banks of an intermittent watercourse.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Slope Stabilization Work Details, prepared by Dereje Tafesse, Town of Markham, dated September 15, 2003, received September 17, 2003. z Red-Lined Proposed Plan - Clark Avenue, prepared by Dereje Tafesse, Town of Markham, dated September 15, 2003, received September 17, 2003. z Existing Plan - Clark Avenue, prepared by Dereje Tafesse, Town of Markham, dated September 15, 2003, received September 17, 2003. z Proposed Profile, Detail A-A, prepared by Dereje Tafesse, Town of Markham, dated September 15, 2003, received September 17, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

721 Proposal: The proposed works involve the installation of armour stone along the banks of the intermittent watercourse. In December 1998, the Town of Markham Operations Department installed a parabolic gate at Clark Avenue (west of Henderson Avenue). The installation of these grates was to prevent flooding and eliminate hazards to public safety. Upon the completion of this work involving the parabolic grates, a minor slope instability problem occurred on the east side of the bank. However, the west side of the bank and slope is in stable condition and does not require remedial work. Armour stone will be placed along the area of instability, which measures approximately 6 metres in length. The intermittent watercourse is within a municipal park and is piped downstream of the subject site. The watercourse does not exist upstream of the site due to an adjacent school.

Control of Flooding: There are no major grade changes proposed and the armour stone will be keyed into the eroded slope; thereby restoring the natural profile of the bank. The proposed works will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed prior to construction and maintained on a daily basis to ensure that sediment will not enter the watercourse. All excavated material will be removed and disposed of off-site.

Conservation of Land: TRCA technical staff has reviewed the proposal and conducted a site visit. Staff notes that there are no geotechnical/slope stability issues associated with the proposed works. The proposed works are located within an intermittent watercourse, however, it is noted that this watercourse is not considered fish habitat and therefore, Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) approval is not required. There will be no impacts to other significant resource features.

Plantings Riparian vegetation that will be disturbed within the affected reach will be replanted in accordance with TRCA requirements.

Policy Guidelines: This project complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34519 Application #: 286/03/MARK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 3, 2003.

9.1.30 HANNA DE LARZAC To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 46 and Part of Lot 37, Plan 401, 17 Maple Lane, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Hanna De Larzac.

722 The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of various additions to an existing residence.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of various additions to the existing residence including a two-storey addition to the rear and a one-storey garage addition to the western portion of the house. A small addition will also be constructed on the east side of the residence. The subject property is located within the Fill Regulated Area but outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. The existing residence is located on the south side of Maple Lane, east of Main Street Unionville. The works are sufficiently setback from the stream corridor.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Conservation of Land: The proposed works are located entirely on tableland and are sufficiently set back from the stream corridor. TRCA staff conducted a site visit to the subject property and confirmed that there are no geotechnical/slope stability issues related to the development. Furthermore, there are no fisheries impacts nor will the additions affect any existing significant natural resource features.

Plantings The proposed works are located on the existing manicured portion of the rear and sideyards and as such, no plantings are proposed as part of this application.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(C) - Minor Additions, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

723 CFN: 34830 Application #: 427/03/MARK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: November 4, 2003

9.1.31 MANNY & TERESA PAPADIMITROPOULOS To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 41, Plan 401, 8 Eckardt Street, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ted Chisholm.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River and within the Unionville Special Policy Area.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Red Line Revised Lot Drainage and House Siting Control Plan, prepared by R.G. McKibbon Limited, dated September 29, 2003, received October 2, 2003. z House 783, Drawing Nos. A-1, A-2, A-3 & A-4, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated September 2003, received October 2, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a single family residence on the subject property. The subject site is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and within the Unionville Special Policy Area. The proposed residence is located on the north side of Eckardt Street, east of Main Street Unionville and on an existing lot of record. TRCA staff is satisfied that the proposed works are not located within the hydraulic floodway and that they will be adequately floodproofed in accordance with Special Policy Area requirements.

Control of Flooding: Openings to the basement of the proposed residence will be dry floodproofed above the 350-year flood level of 171.62 metres while the main floor of the dwelling will be dry floodproofed above the Regional Storm flood level of 174.19 metres. All excess fill will be removed from the site, in accordance with Special Policy Area requirements. Therefore, TRCA Water Management Group staff is satisfied that the proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 140 metres away.

724 Conservation of Land: The proposed residence is located entirely on tableland and will not impact the valley/stream corridor. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. TRCA staff conducted a site visit the property and noted that there are no fisheries and no slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. Furthermore, there will be no impact to any significant natural features.

Plantings As the proposed works are located more than 100 metres away from the stream corridor, no plantings are proposed as part of this application.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.1(B) - Development Guidelines/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34659 Application #: 361/03/MARK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: November 3, 2003.

9.1.32 TED CHISHOLM & MARY ELIZ SULLIVAN To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 39, 40, 43, 44, Plan 401, 10 Eckardt Street, in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ted Chisholm & Mary Eliz Sullivan.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a single family residence within the Regional Storm Floodplain of the Rouge River and within the Unionville Special Policy Area.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Red Line Revised Lot Drainage and House Siting Control Plan, prepared by R.G. McKibbon Limited, dated September 29, 2003, received October 2, 2003. z House 784, Drawing Nos. A-1, A-2, A-3 & A-4, prepared by The Gregory Design Group, dated August 2003, received October 2, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

725 Proposal: The proposal involves the excavation and placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Rouge River to facilitate the construction of a single family dwelling on the subject property. The subject site is located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and within the Unionville Special Policy Area. The proposed residence is located on the north side of Eckardt Street and east of Main Street Unionville and on an existing lot of record. TRCA staff is satisfied that the proposed works are not located within the hydraulic floodway and that they will be adequately floodproofed in accordance with Special Policy Area requirements.

Control of Flooding: Openings to the basement for the proposed residence will be dry floodproofed above the 350-year flood level of 171.62 metres while the main floor of the home will be dry floodproofed above the Regional Storm flood level of 174.19 metres. All excess fill will be removed from the site, in accordance with Special Policy Area requirements. Therefore, TRCA Water Management Group staff is satisfied that the proposed works will not impact the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Silt fencing will be installed and maintained during construction to prevent sediment from entering the watercourse which is located approximately 140 metres away.

Conservation of Land: The proposed residence is located entirely on tableland and will not impact the valley/stream corridor. The proposed works are consistent with existing development in the corridor reach. TRCA staff conducted a site visit to the subject property and noted that there are no fisheries and no slope stability issues associated with the proposed development. Furthermore, there will be no impact to any significant natural features.

Plantings As the proposed works are located more than 100 metres away from the stream corridor, no plantings are proposed as part of this application.

CFN: 34660 Application #: 362/03/MARK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: November 3, 2003.

726 9.1.33 THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Lot 10, 11, Concession 9, (at a T- intersection of Highway 7 and the proposed Markham By-pass, located west of 9th Line and east of Reesor Road (10th Line)), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Ministry of Transportation Ontario.

The purpose is to construct a structure (culvert extensions) within a Regional Storm Floodplain; alter a watercourse (tributary C of Little Rouge River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dam and pump around method. The subject property is not regulated for fill placement at this time.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Cover Sheet; dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH. z Sheet 1-Index; dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH. z Sheet 2-Removals; Highway 7 Sta. 27+600 to Sta. 28+225; dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH. z Sheet 5-New Construction – Markham By-pass (Y.R. 48) Sta. 10+625 to Sta. 10+950; dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH. z Sheet 7-New Construction – Highway 7 Sta. 27+925 to Sta. 28+225; dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH. z Sheet 9-Typical Sections – Markham By-pass (Y.R. 48); dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH. z Sheet 10-Typical Sections – Highway 7, dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH. z Sheet 15- Concrete Culvert Extension; dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH. z Sheet STAND-1-Ontario Provincial Standards Erosion & Sediment Control; dated August 2003; received August 27, 2003; prepared by TSH.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The project involves the widening of Highway 7 from just east of the northern route of the existing Markham Bypass to just west of Reesor Road (10th Line) and the construction of Markham By-pass southerly from Highway 7 at the culvert crossing to Highway 407. The Highway 7 widening and the new Markham By-pass work, which is designed by Totten Sims Hubicki for the Region of York, will be tendered and constructed with the Highway 407 interchange, by 407ETR. The lands are presently owned by the Ministry of Transportation Ontario and the Region of York will acquire the lands. The proposal involves the installation of culvert extensions on the south and the north sides of the existing box culvert along Highway 7, just west of Reesor Road (10th Line) in order to facilitate the widening of Highway 7. The existing culvert will be extended 18400 +180mm to the north and 9400 + 115mm to the south through a dam and pump method in order to work in the dry. The watercourse, Tributary C, does have an upstream drainage area greater than 125 hectares. The existing culvert and 727 culvert extensions are a temporary condition. Planning is currently underway for the development of lands north and south of Highway 7, and the engineering firm working for the developers (Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited) has advised that they will require a new culvert under Highway 7 that is deeper and larger than the existing culvert to carry post-development flows to a proposed Storm Water Management pond south of Highway 7. The route of the Markham By-pass was reviewed by staff during the environmental assessment process.

Control of Flooding: TRCA staff has reviewed the culvert extensions and does not anticipate any concerns related to flood conveyance or storage.

Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (check dams, silt fence, pea gravel bag coffer dam) will be implemented to ensure that the construction-generated sediments do not enter the watercourse. Grassed swales along the roadway will dissipate flows and address water quality.

Conservation of Land: There will be in stream works associated with this project. A pea gravel bag coffer dam and pump around method will be utilized in order to work in the dry. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO).

Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non-invasive species following construction.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3-Infrastructure and Servicing-of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34200 Application #: 092/03/MARK Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: September 2, 2003

9.1.34 VALERI KOGAN To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 78, Plan 65M-2063, 18 Northumberland Terrace, in the Town of Markham, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Valeri Kogan.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of an in-ground pool in the rearyard of the existing residence.

728 The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Red-Line Revised Site Plan, prepared by Rosehill Pools, received October 17, 2003. Geotechnical Slope Stability, Letter of Opinion, prepared by Alston Associates Inc., dated October 10, 2003, received October 16, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Don River to facilitate the construction of an in-ground swimming pool at the rear of the existing residence. The subject property is located within the Fill Regulated Area but outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works are not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will not affect the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Conservation of Land: The proposed pool will maintain a 4 m (13 ft) setback from the top of bank. A geotechnical assessment was submitted for the review of TRCA staff. This letter of opinion has been reviewed and approved by TRCA technical staff. A site visit to the subject property also confirmed that the proposed works will not have a negative impact on existing slope stability. Furthermore, the proposed pool will not impact any significant resources features and there are no fisheries concerns associated with the proposed works.

Plantings Given that the proposed works are located on the existing manicured portion of the rearyard and no vegetation will be removed, plantings are not proposed as part of this application.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal complies with Section 4.2.2(E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34597 Application #: 334/03/MARK Report Prepared by: Kevin Huang, extension 5307 For information contact: Russel White, extension 5306 Date: November 3, 2003

729 THE FOLLOWING PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE ERRATA ITEMS:

RES.#B163/03 - APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 158 - ERRATA APPLICATIONS

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor

THAT permits be granted in accordance with Ontario Regulation 158 for the applications (9.1.35 - 9.1.52, with the exception of 9.1.39 - Frances Woodhouse, 9.1.40 - Sandra Perfetto and 9.1.44 - Katherine Paquette, which were withdrawn), that had been scheduled on the agenda as errata items for which all the required information was received and finalized as listed below. CARRIED CITY OF BRAMPTON

9.1.35 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To place fill within a regulated area on the northwest quadrant of Queen Street and Airport Road intersection, in the City of Brampton, Mimico Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of Peel.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill (for open cut crossing and tunnel crossing of tributary of Mimico Creek) in a Fill Regulated Area.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering and restoration plans); dated November 11, 2003; received November 11, 2003; prepared by the Region of Peel.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: There are a total of 19 permit applications associated with the York Peel Feedermain which stretches from Queen Street and Airport road in the west, north on Airport Road, east of Castlemore Road, east on Rutherford, north on Weston Road, east on Teston to east of Jane at the Keele Street Reservoir.

This proposal involves open cut approaches, tunneling under a tributary of the Mimico Creek to install a 2100mm dia. CPP . The site is located within a Fill Regulated Area and Regional Storm Floodplain. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process.

Control of Flooding: As all existing ground elevations throughout the Regional Storm Floodplain will be maintained, therefore, the control of flooding will not be implicated.

730 Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (rock check dams, pea gravel bag and silt fence combination, dewatering trap) will be implemented to ensure that the construction-generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: As there will be no in stream work associated with the project there will be no concerns related to fish habitat loss. The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. There will be no slope stability issues related to the works.

Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non-invasive species following construction. Only herbaceous material 2500m2 will be removed for the open cut and will be replaced like for like with a seed mix .

Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34721 Application #: 369/03/BRAM Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: October 9, 2003

CITY OF MISSISSAUGA

9.1.36 1525292 ONTARIO LIMITED C/O VILLARBOIT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Lot 5, Concession 1 NDS, (1475 Dundas Street East), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by 1525292 Ontario Limited c/o Villarboit Development Corporation.

The purpose is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated area and construct within the regulatory floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek to facilitate the construction of a commercial building located within the Dixie/Dundas Special Policy Area of the City of Mississauga..

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Site Plan, prepared by Young & Wright Architects Inc., drawing no. A1.0, dated October 23, 2003, revised October 23, 2003, received by TRCA staff on November 4, 2003. z Grading Plan, prepared by Stantec Consultants Ltd., drawing no. SW2, dated August 2003, revised August 22, 2003, received by TRCA staff on September 22, 2003. z Servicing Plan, prepared by Stantec Consultants Ltd., drawing no. SW3, dated August 2003, revised August 22, 2003, received by TRCA staff on September 22, 2003.

731 z Letter of Undertaking from Graham Hunter, of Young & Wright Architects Inc., dated November 12, 2003 to address structural engineering details and concerns.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to place and remove fill within a Fill Regulated Area and construct within the regulatory floodplain of the Etobicoke Creek to facilitate the construction of a 569.10 square metre (6126 square foot) commercial building located within the Dixie/Dundas Special Policy Area (SPA). The subject property is located on the north side of Dundas Street just east of Dixie Road. The lot is currently utilized for parking for an adjacent Future Shop development. In accordance with SPA criteria, development on the subject property should be floodproofed to the Regional Storm Flood elevation or, if demonstrated to be not feasible, the 350-year elevation as a minimum. The applicant has demonstrated that the Regional Storm Flood elevation is not feasible given the existing elevation of the established grades within the parking area. The proposed addition will be flood-proofed to the 350-year storm elevation and certified to withstand the associated flood velocities.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works are within a spillway of the regulatory floodplain but located outside the hydraulic floodway. This development is not expected to impact the conveyance or storage of floodwaters.

Pollution: Sedimentation and erosion control fencing shall be installed and maintained around the construction area during the construction process.

Conservation of Land: The proposal does not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and there are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns associated with this application.

Plantings The existing site is currently a paved parking area for an adjacent commercial lot. As such, no significant vegetation is to be removed through this project and no compensatory planting is required. Landscaping requirements will be addressed through the Site Plan approval process.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.1 (B) - Development Guidelines for Development/Redevelopment within Designated Two Zone Areas or Special Policy Areas.

CFN: 34751 Application #: 393/03/MISS Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: November 5, 2003

732 9.1.37 JOZO KOVACEVIC To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Block H, Plan 924, (1880 Sismet Road), in the City of Mississauga, Etobicoke Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Jozo Kovacevic.

The purpose is to construct and place fill within a regulated area on 1880 Sismet Road, in the City of Mississauga associated with the Etobicoke Creek as located on the property owned by Jozo Kovacevic.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Proposed Site Plan, prepared by R.I. Cerny, drawing no. SP.1, dated September 10, 2002, revised September 9, 2003, received by TRCA staff on September 18, 2003. z Proposed Site Services Plan, prepared by R.I. Cerny, drawing no. SP.2, dated September 9, 2003, revised September 9, 2003, received by TRCA staff on September 18, 2003. z Legal Survey, prepared by Speight, Van Nostrand & Gibson Ltd., dated December 2, 2002, received by TRCA staff on September 18, 2003. z Letter of Undertaking from R.I. Cerny, from Cerny Engineering Inc., dated November 12, 2003 to address landscaping details.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to remove and place fill and undertake minor regrading in order to facilitate the construction of an industrial/office building and associated parking area at 1880 Sismet Road in the City of Mississauga. The subject property is within the Fill Regulated Area of Etobicoke Creek, but is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. The proposed works involve the construction of a 2719.63 square metre (8922.67 square foot) building and 21 associated parking spaces.

Control of Flooding: The subject property is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As a result, there will be no impact on the storage and conveyance of floodwaters.

Pollution: Sedimentation and erosion control fencing shall be installed and maintained around the construction area during the construction period to prevent sedimentation of the Etobicoke Creek.

733 Conservation of Land: The works will not impact on significant resource features as there are no fisheries or geotechnical issues associated with the proposal. The proposed building and parking area encroaches within the 10 metre buffer adjacent to the top of bank feature and valley slope. However, these lands form part of a sale and exchange of lands between the Authority and the previous land owner, and a restrictive covenant has been registered on the balance of the valleylands on-site.

Plantings The proposed works involve the planting of native and non-invasive species between the proposed development and top of bank feature as compensation for required setback reductions.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.1 - New Development of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34638 Application #: 355/03/MISS Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: November 5, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (ETOBICOKE COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.38 HARMONY PARK PROPERTIES INC To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 19, Concession 6 Part Lot 20, Plan 65R-5191, (South of Finch Avenue West, East of Islington Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Etobicoke Community Council Area), Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Harmony Park Properties Inc.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a fill regulated area to facilitate the restoration of a former landfill site. This is the first of a series of permits that will be required to facilitate site cleanup, the construction of a multi-unit townhouse development, and construction of associated stormwater management facilities on the site.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2008. z Letter to TRCA from Bernard Moore, Candec Consultants, dated November 11, 2003 and received on November 11, 2003. z Redlined Tree Survey Plan prepared by Terraplan, dated October 10, 2003 and received on November 11, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

734 Proposal: The proposal is to excavate and place fill within a portion of the Humber River valley. The excavation and placing of fill is necessary to remove landfill existing on site since the 1960's. All contaminated fill will be removed from the site and clean fill will be used to restore the site to the existing grades. The works affect a portion of the valley system on the subject property. A staging area, located at least 10 metres from the top of bank and isolated from the valley by a silt fence, will be used to sort the excavated fill. The applicant will provide a letter of undertaking to renaturalize the affected slope, top of bank and required buffer to TRCA's satisfaction following completion of the works. The property will be subject to a site plan application for a multi-unit townhouse development and TRCA review of the renaturalization plans will be addressed at this site plan approval stage.

Control of Flooding: All works will not take place in the Regional Storm Floodplain and therefore will have no impact on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: A silt fence will be installed prior to the works taking place to ensure no sediment is discharged to the watercourse. The silt fence will be installed above the top of bank in those areas where no disturbance of the bank is necessary to excavate landfill. The silt fence will also isolate the fill staging area from the top of bank by at least 10 metres. The silt fence will be located a minimum of 2 metres above the toe of slope in those areas where disturbance of the bank is necessary to excavate landfill.

Conservation of Land: There will be no in-water works. No significant resource features will be impacted by the proposed works. The proposal limits the removal of vegetation to those areas where fill must be excavated and replaced within the valley lands. All disturbed areas will be stabilized/revegetated following excavation. In addition, the required buffer will be renaturalized.

Plantings Details of the plantings and renaturalization of the excavated portion of the valley lands, the top of bank and the required buffer will be addressed at the site plan approval stage, as per a letter of undertaking from the applicant.

Policy Guidelines: There are no policies in the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program relative to restoration of former landfill sites. The proposal complies with Policy 3.2.2(C) - Policies and Procedures for Establishing Corridor Boundaries and Alterations - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program - as the excavation and placing of fill in the valley lands is not for the purposes of creating additional usable area and/or to accommodate development. Rather, the proposed works are for the purpose of eliminating a public health hazard.

735 CFN: 34803 Application #: 407/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 30, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (NORTH YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.39 FRANCES WOODHOUSE To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 13, Lot 12, Plan 3955, (3 May Tree Road), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Frances Woodhouse. z Withdrawn

9.1.40 SANDRA PERFETTO To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 24, Plan 5982, (32 York Valley Crescent), in the City of Toronto (North York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Sandra Perfetto. z Withdrawn

CITY OF TORONTO (SCARBOROUGH COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.41 CITY OF TORONTO (DISTRICT 4) To place fill within a regulated area on (Bellamy Road North - north of Banmoor Boulevard, south of Burnview Crescent), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by City of Toronto (District 4).

The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the relocation of a watermain crossing West Highland Creek by the directional bore method..

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Cross Section Drawing NO. 692E, prepared by MacViro Consultants, dated June 2003, revised and received November 5, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

736 Proposal: The purpose is to excavate and replace fill in a Fill Regulated Area to facilitate the relocation of a watermain crossing by the directional bore method. The proposed works involve the replacement of the existing watermain. The new crossing has a depth of 3 meters below the watercourse and is located on the opposite side of Bellamy Road, north of the existing watermain and runs north to Banmoor Boulevard. The entry and exit excavations will be located away from the creek area.

Control of Flooding: No excavated material is to be stockpiled within the Regional Storm Floodplain and all existing grades are to be maintained. There are no anticipated impacts from the works on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Silt fencing encircles the bore pit locations to impede the overland migration of construction generated sediments. Any dewatering shall take place in such a manner as to ensure that any pumped water will be directed to a sediment control device prior to discharge.

Conservation of Land: There are no instream works or impacts to riparian vegetation. The watermain crossing is 3 meters below the watercourse. There will be no impact to fisheries, and therefore , a Letter of Advice will be issued on behalf of DFO. The applicant has been advised that this project is subject to the Ministry of Natural Resource's (MNR) warm water timing window and that all works must be completed between July 1 and March 31 of any given year, unless otherwise directed by MNR. The bore pit locations are setback from the top of bank and encircled by sediment and erosion control fencing. There are no fisheries concerns, geo-technical issues or impacts on natural features related to these works.

Plantings Plantings of native and non-invasive species are required as part of this project. All disturbed areas near the creek will be restored to existing conditions or better.

Policy Guidelines: The works comply with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34544 Application #: 308/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: September 23, 2003

9.1.42 ELEANOR WARE To place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 29, Plan 1079, (51 Presley Avenue), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Eleanor Ware.

737 The purpose is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a retaining wall perpendicular to the valley corridor, on a secondary slope between residential lots, for erosion control purposes.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Site Plan for TRCA, prepared by the applicant, dated November, 2003, date received November 6, 2003. z Detail for Retaining Wall at #51 Presley Avenue, prepared by the applicant, date received November 6, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The purpose of this proposal is to place fill in a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of a concrete retaining wall for erosion control purposes. Currently, the difference in grade between the adjacent properties due to the secondary slope is causing significant erosion during the springtime and year round storm events. The retaining wall will be set back over 10m from, and perpendicular to, the valley corridor and will provide erosion control on a secondary slope between residential lots. Significant natural areas will not be affected, the works will not impact on the primary valley slope and erosion or slope instability on adjacent properties will not result.

Control of Flooding: The retaining wall will be located over 10m from the top of bank, outside of the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Don River. Hence, there will be no impacts on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion control fencing will be erected and maintained during construction in order to contain any construction-generated sediment.

Conservation of Land: TRCA geotechnical engineering staff is satisfied that the retaining wall is required to stabilize the slope and is satisfied with the design and placement of the wall. There are no fisheries resources concerns related to this project. All disturbed areas are to be restored following construction.

Plantings The slopes on both sides of the retaining wall are to be restored with native, non-invasive species shrub and herbaceous plantings.

Policy Guidelines: This project is consistent with Section 3.2.1(D) - Valley Corridors - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

738 CFN: 34590 Application #: 330/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 31, 2003

9.1.43 JOE & VICKI ATKINS To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 34, Concession A Lot 37, Plan 2836, (9 & 11 Fallingbrook Drive), in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Waterfront Watershed as located on the property owned by Joe & Vicki Atkins.

The purpose is to excavate and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Lake Ontario Waterfront to facilitate the construction of a new dwelling and extension of the existing pool. The two existing dwellings (9 and 11 Fallingbrook) will be demolished.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Site Plan Drawing No. A-001, Foundation Plan (Main) Drawing No. A-101, Basement Plan Drawing No. A-102, Section (Main Building) Drawing A-107, Foundation/Basement Coach Drawing No. A-201, Section (Coach House) Drawing No. A-105, General Notes Drawing S.1, Foundation Plans S2-S4, Details S3.1

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The applicant is proposing to construct a new two-storey dwelling to replace the two existing dwellings as well as an inground pool. The subject property is entirely within a Fill Regulated Area of the waterfront. The proposed works will take place along the bluff area of the waterfront in the community of Scarborough.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works are outside the Floodplain of the waterfront. Therefore, there will be no effects on the storage or conveyance of flood waters.

Pollution: A silt fence will be installed and maintained during construction. Sediment movement will not present a risk to pollution.

Conservation of Land: The proposed dwelling and extension of the pool will not extend any closer to the bluff than what is existing. Authority staff has no concerns with regards to slope stability/geotechnical issues. There will be no impacts on significant natural features, fisheries, or riparian vegetation.

739 Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored to existing conditions. Landscaping will be required as part of this project.

Policy Guidelines: The project is consistent with Section 4.2. - Existing Development of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program and works are in compliance with the Provincial Policy Statement for Natural Hazards on the Great Lakes Shoreline.

CFN: 34794 Application #: 403/03/TOR Report Prepared by: Annemarie Sanchez, extension 5284 For information contact: Steve Heuchert, extension 5311 Date: October 28, 2003

CITY OF TORONTO (TORONTO EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AREA)

9.1.44 KATHERINE PAQUETTE To place fill within a regulated area on Lot 6, Plan 66M-2472, (38 True Davidson Drive), in the City of Toronto (Toronto East York Community Council Area), Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Katherine Paquette. z Withdrawn

CITY OF VAUGHAN

9.1.45 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway, construct in a flood plain on Rutherford Road (220m east of Huntington), in the City of Vaughan, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York.

The purpose is to alter a watercourse (tributary of Humber River Tributary ) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dam and pump around method in order to open cut install a 1800mm Feedermain. The subject property is not regulated for fill placement at this time.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Letter of Undertaking (to provide minor revisions to engineering and restoration plans); dated November 5, 2003; received November 6, 2003; prepared by the Regional Municipality of York.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

740 Proposal: The proposal is part of the York Peel Feedermain works. There are a total of 19 permit applications associated with the York Peel Feedermain which stretches from Queen Street and Airport Road in the west, north on Airport Road, east on Castlemore Road, east on Rutherford Road, north on Weston Road, east on Teston to east of Jane at the Keele Street Reservoir (approximately).

The proposal consists of the open cut crossing of the tributary of the Humber River to install a 1800mm Feedermain. Feedermain construction to be completed prior to proposed roadworks and new culvert which are covered under a separate permit. The site is located within a Regional Storm Floodplain, however, the Fill lines are not registered. The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process.

Control of Flooding: Final grades will match existing therefore; there will be no impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters.

Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, dam and pump around method with pea gravel bags, check dams) will be implemented to ensure that the construction-generated sediments do not enter the watercourse.

The distance from the invert of the creek to the obvert of the sleeve has been reviewed and is adequate. The future works will involve a culvert extension and the Feedermain will be located under the proposed culvert.

Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non-invasive species following construction. All removed plant material will be stockpiled and utilized as seed bank for restoration purposes.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority’s Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34728 Application #: 376/03/VAUG Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: October 10, 2003 741 9.1.46 DUFFERIN CONSTRUCTION CO. To alter a waterway on Teston Road (175m west of Keele Street), in the City of Vaughan, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Regional Municipality of York.

The purpose is to alter a watercourse (tributary of West Don River) during the warmwater timing window (July 1 to March 31) through a dewatering sump method in order to remove the existing 1200mm x 16m CSP and replace with a 1200mm x 35m CSP. The subject property is not regulated for fill placement at this time.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Sheet ESC-23TR-Culvert 1200mm CSP at Sta. 16+025-Erosion Control Plan; last revised November 2003; received November 11, 2003; prepared by Earth Tech, URS, MMM. z Sheet DW-23TR-Culvert 1200mm CSP at Sta. 16+025-Dewatering Plan; last revised November 2003; received November 11, 2003; prepared by Earth Tech, URS, MMM.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is part of the York Peel Feedermain works. There are a total of 19 permit applications associated with the York Peel Feedermain which stretches from Queen Street and Airport Road in the west, north on Airport Road, east on Castlemore Road, east on Rutherford Road, north on Weston Road, east on Teston to east of Jane at the Keele Street Reservoir (approximately).

This file involves the Teston Road widening from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with a middle left turn lane. The proposal consists of the phased removal (south side first) of the existing 1200mm diameter x 16 m length CSP and the replacement with a 1200mm x 35 m culvert.

The project was reviewed by TRCA staff during the Environmental Assessment process.

Control of Flooding: The subject property is not located within the Regional Storm Floodplain, therefore; there will not be any impacts to flooding.

Pollution: Standard erosion control measures (silt fence, rock check dam, dewatering sump) will be implemented to ensure that the construction-generated sediments do not enter the Don River downstream.

742 Conservation of Land: Stream is historically intermittent and site inspection revealed defined bed and banks downstream of Teston Road. There will be in stream works associated with this project. A rock check dam will be installed upstream of the small tributary in order to catch any sediments during removals. With erosion and sedimentation plans in effect, the potential for a harmful alteration, disruption or destruction (HADD) of fish habitat will be mitigated and a Letter of Advice will be written by TRCA staff on behalf of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The proposed works will impact no significant terrestrial resource features. There will be no slope stability issues related to the works.

Plantings All disturbed areas will be restored with native/non-invasive species following construction. Approximately 3360m2 of new herbaceous planting will be installed on site.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal complies with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing of the Authority’s Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34738 Application #: 386/03/VAUG Report Prepared by: June Murphy, extension 5304 For information contact: June Murphy, extension 5304 Date: October 14, 2003

TOWN OF CALEDON

9.1.47 1557257 ONTARIO INC. To alter a waterway on Lot 11, Plan M-419, (9 Browning Court), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by 1557257 Ontario Inc..

The purpose is to alter a watercourse and construct a stormwater outfall and associated retaining wall to service a proposed industrial building at 9 Browning Court in the Town of Caledon.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Site Plan, prepared by B.B. Beech, drawing no. SP1, dated May 29, 2003, redline revised November 12, 2003 to address rock check dam details, received by TRCA staff on November 4, 2003. z Site Plan Details, prepared by B.B. Beech, drawing no. SP2, dated May 29, 2003, revised October 21, 2003, received by TRCA staff on November 4, 2003. z Letter of Undertaking from Monica E. Clarke, from Alexander Budrevics Associates Ltd, dated November 12, 2003, to address minor landscaping details.

743 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal involves shaping the channel of a Fill Line Extension watercourse within a channelized drainage easement and the construction of a stormwater outfall and associated retaining wall on an industrial property being proposed in Bolton. The proposed works are to implement the channel design proposed in the Master Drainage Plan for the area, and to service stormwater for the proposed industrial building. The adjacent watercourse was constructed to convey stormwater and does not provide direct fish habitat and only limited indirect habitat. Therefore, the re-grading of the watercourse will not constitute a Harmful Alteration, Disruption or Destruction (HADD) of fish habitat.

Control of Flooding: The proposed re-grading of the watercourse and associated works will have no negative impact on the storage or conveyance of floodwaters as the removal of existing sediment will allow the drainage easement to function according to the designed capacity requirements. A retaining wall is proposed adjacent to the drainage easement to allow for appropriate grades for stormwater management and to maximize buildable area. The site plan was designed in accordance with the requirements of and to the satisfaction of the Town of Caledon.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion controls will be installed prior to the start of any construction on-site. Sediment control fencing will be implemented along the perimeter of the property and incorporated into all proposed works to mitigate against the overland migration of sediment into the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: The works will take place within the Fisheries Warmwater Timing Window, with no works taking place between April 1 to June 31. The proposed works do not involve the removal of any significant vegetation and there are no geotechnical concerns. All disturbed areas are to be topsoiled and sodded to their original condition using a native seed mix.

Plantings The proposal involves the planting of native and non-invasive plant species evenly dispersed along the rear of the subject property and the balance of the site.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.3 - Infrastructure and Servicing and Section 4.2.2. (E) - Development and Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non-Established Communities/ Highly Urbanized Area - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34680 Application #: 366/03/CAL Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: November 5, 2003

744 9.1.48 BRUNO GIANCOLA To place fill within a regulated area on East Half Lot 7, Concession 7 , Part Lot 5, Plan ALB-2, (148 Old King Road), in the Town of Caledon, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Bruno Giancola.

The purpose is to place fill within a Fill Regulated Area of the Humber River on an existing residential lot at 148 Old King Road in the Village of Bolton. The proposal involves the construction of a in-ground swimming pool, patio, wood fence and associated landscape features.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Site Plan and Landscape Details, prepared by The MBTW Group, drawing no. L-1, dated July 23, 2002, received by TRCA staff on October 31, 2003. z Legal Survey, prepared by I.M. Pastushak Ltd., dated April 29, 1999, received by TRCA staff on October 31, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal consists of excavating fill in order to facilitate the construction of a in-ground pool, patio, wood fence and associated landscape features at 148 Old King Road in the Village of Bolton. The subject property is entirely within a Fill Regulated Area, but is located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain.

Control of Flooding: The proposed works are located outside of the Regional Storm Floodplain. As a result, the conveyance and storage of floodwaters will not be affected by this proposal.

Pollution: The subject property is located approximately 200 metres away from the nearest watercourse. The proposed works will not result in sedimentation of the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: The property is located within an existing residential subdivision in the Village of Bolton. The proposed pool and associated development will not impact any significant vegetation on the subject property. There are no geotechnical or fisheries related concerns with the proposal

Plantings The proposal involves the planting of various native, non-invasive shrubs surrounding the proposed works.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is in conformity with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

745 CFN: 34815 Application #: 419/03/CAL Report Prepared by: Adam Miller, extension 5244 For information contact: Quentin Hanchard, extension 5324 Date: November 5, 2003

TOWN OF MARKHAM

9.1.49 PHYLLIS CASADOS/ANNE NERENBERG/GIL CASADOS To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on (25 Glenbourne Park Drive), in the Town of Markham, Rouge River Watershed as located on the property owned by Phyllis Casados/Anne Nerenberg/Gil Casados.

The purpose is to construct in the flood plain and place fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of an on-site sewage system at a residential property at 25 Glenbourne Park Drive.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005. z Red-line revised (to indicate silt fence) Site Plan, Drawing 00-1542, prepared by Rural Development Consultants Limited, dated November 4, 2003, received November 5, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: This proposal involves construction in the flood plain and the placement of fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to facilitate the construction of an on-site sewage system at a residential property at 25 Glenbourne Park Drive. The existing sewage system, located at the front of the house, is failing and is in need of replacement. The rear of the subject property is heavily treed and a clearing created from the installation of a clay tennis court is the proposed location for the new sewage system. The clay tennis court is to be removed and the sewage system installed in its place. A new forcemain will be installed along an existing path through the trees, extending from the single family residence to the proposed sewage system location. The design contact area of the sewage system will be located outside the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River, with approximately half of the mantle area being located within the flood plain. All efforts have been made to locate the sewage system in a location that results in a minimal impact to the natural features of the area. As a result, no trees will be removed as part of this proposal and the work site will be located over 30 m from the watercourse.

Control of Flooding: Despite being partially located within the Regional Storm Flood Plain of the Rouge River, the TRCA Water Management Group staff is satisfied that there will be no negative impacts to the storage and conveyance of flood waters.

746 Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to prevent construction-generated sediment from entering the watercourse.

Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical/slope stability issues related to this project, nor are there any fisheries resources concerns as the proposed site is over 30m from the watercourse.. No trees will be removed as part of this proposal. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction.

Plantings There will be no natural heritage features that will be negatively impacted by the proposed development, hence no additional plantings are required. The disturbed area will be resodded. Any tree or shrub plantings may have a negative impact on the functionality of the sewage system and will therefore not be undertaken as part of this project.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (E) - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non-Established Communities/Highly Urbanized Areas, Property Improvements & Ancillary Structures - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34746 Application #: 392/03/MARK Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 16, 2003

TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL

9.1.50 MATTAMY (WILCOX) LIMITED To alter a waterway on Part Lot 67, 68, Concession 1, (west of Bayview Avenue, north of North Lake Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Humber River Watershed as located on the property owned by Mattamy (Wilcox) Limited.

The purpose is to alter a waterway by constructing a storm water outlet to Lake Wilcox, in order to service a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (19T-89042), known as Wildflower on Bayview.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2008. z Drawing No. 425, Wildwood Avenue, STA. 0+300 to STA.0+603.93, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., date last revised June 12, 2003. z Drawing No. 507, Grading Plan, prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., date last revised September 12, 2003.

747 RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway by constructing a storm water outlet to Lake Wilcox, in order to service a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (19T-89042), known as Wildflower on Bayview. Authority staff reviewed the subdivision and recommended conditions of draft approval, including obtaining any permit necessary under Ontario Regulation 158.

Control of Flooding: The proposed outlet is appropriately designed in order to convey flood flows safely, up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected.

Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of Lake Wilcox will not occur.

Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical or fisheries issues associated with this project and the work will not affect any significant natural heritage features. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction.

Plantings Following construction, the entire subdivision will be landscaped with several hundred native trees, shrubs and herbaceous species. This landscape plan was reviewed to the satisfaction of staff.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34770 Application #: 394/03/RH Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: October 22, 2003

9.1.51 ROMA PREMIUM MEATS LTD. To construct in a flood plain, place fill within a regulated area on Part Lot 10, 11, Plan 4840, (69 Industrial Road), in the Town of Richmond Hill, Don River Watershed as located on the property owned by Roma Premium Meats Ltd.

The purpose is to construct in the flood plain and place Fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to permit the construction of a minor addition to an existing food processing facility at 69 Industrial Road, in the Town of Richmond Hill.

748 The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2005 in accordance with the following documents and plans which form part of this permit: z Site Development Plan and Lot Grading, Drawing SD3, prepared by The Thompson Rosemount Group, dated October 27, 2003, date received October 31, 2003. z Sediment Control Plan, Drawing SK.1, prepared by The Thompson Rosemount Group, dated November 3, 2003, date received November 11, 2003.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: This proposal involves construction in the flood plain and the placement of Fill within a Fill Regulated Area in order to permit the construction of a minor addition to an existing food processing facility at 69 Industrial Road, in the Town of Richmond Hill. The subject area is susceptible to wide, shallow flooding and is currently being considered as a candidate Special Policy Area as there is extensive historical development in the area. Until further notice, the TRCA has agreed to apply interim procedures when considering development applications within this area. As a result, this proposal has been reviewed and recommended for approval by staff in light of SPA minor addition requirements.

Control of Flooding: TRCA Water Management Group staff is satisfied that there will be no negative impacts to the storage or conveyance of flood waters. The proposed addition will be located outside of the hydraulic floodway of the Don River and will be adequately floodproofed to the Regional Storm elevation of 236.22 masl.

Pollution: Sediment and erosion control measures will be erected and maintained throughout construction in order to contain any construction-generated sediment.

Conservation of Land: There are no geotechnical/slope stability issues associated with this project, nor are there any fisheries resource concerns. Further, there are no significant natural heritage features on, or adjacent to the subject property that may be negatively impacted by the proposed works. All disturbed areas will be stabilized following construction.

Plantings There will be no vegetation removals required as part of this project and no significant natural heritage features will be negatively impacted. Hence, no additional plantings are required.

Policy Guidelines: This proposal is consistent with Section 4.2.2 (D) - Development & Redevelopment/Intensification Within Non-Established/Highly Urbanized Areas, Minor Additions - of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

749 CFN: 34821 Application #: 422/03/RH Report Prepared by: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 For information contact: Kirsten Kontor, extension 5370 Date: October 31, 2003

TOWN OF WHITCHURCH-STOUFFVILLE

9.1.52 LEBOVIC ENTERPRISES LTD. (1320991 ONTARIO LTD.) To alter a waterway on Lot 33, 34, Concession 9, (south of Main Street, west of 10th Line), in the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville, Duffins Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by Lebovic Enterprises Ltd. (1320991 Ontario Ltd.).

The purpose is to alter a waterway by constructing a storm water outfall that will outlet to Stouffville Creek, in order to service Phase 3 of a draft approved plan of residential subdivision (19T-98006 and 19T-99001), known as Country Walk.

The permit will be issued for the period of November 14, 2003 to November 13, 2008. z Letter of Undertaking from URS Cole, Sherman & Associates Ltd. dated November 12, 2003 stating that all plans will be revised to TRCA satisfaction.

RATIONALE The application was reviewed by staff on the basis of the following information:

Proposal: The proposal is to alter a waterway by constructing a storm water outfall that will outlet to Stouffville Creek, in order to service Phase 3 of a draft approved plan of subdivision (19T-98006 and 19T-99001), known as Country Walk. Authority staff reviewed the subdivision and recommended conditions of draft approval, including obtaining any permit necessary under Ontario Regulation 158.

Control of Flooding: The proposed outfall is appropriately designed in order to convey flood flows safely, up to the Regional Storm. Therefore, the control of flooding will not be affected.

Pollution: A sediment and erosion control plan will be implemented and maintained for the duration of construction, so that sedimentation of Stouffville Creek will not occur.

750 Plantings Following construction, the disturbed area will be restored with native plantings. The landscape plan for the entire subdivision was reviewed to staff's satisfaction.

Policy Guidelines: The proposal is consistent with Section 4.3, Infrastructure and Servicing, of the Authority's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program.

CFN: 34234 Application #: 104/03/WS Report Prepared by: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 For information contact: Mary-Ann Burns, extension 5267 Date: March 26, 2003

______

RES.#B164/03 - ONTARIO REGULATION 158 Delegation of Minor Works Approvals to Staff. To streamline and expedite the review process for minor works within the Fill Regulated Area considered not to affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land.

Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

WHEREAS The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), through its Business Excellence objective, is committed to streamlining the permit approvals process;

WHEREAS the minor works are considered not to affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the permit approval process for minor works in the Fill Regulated Area outlined in the staff report be implemented;

THAT staff be directed to provide a monthly report on issued minor works permits to the Executive Committee for ratification;

AND FURTHER THAT the municipal building departments of TRCA's member municipalities be so advised. CARRIED BACKGROUND Development Services staff have examined streamlining the approval process for minor works affected by the TRCA Fill Regulation in an effort to improve service delivery. The objective is to streamline and expedite the review process of minor works within the Fill Regulated Area and outside the floodplain.

751 Under Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act (CAA), pursuant to Ontario Regulation 158, works involving the placement of fill, including site grading, construction in a floodplain and alteration of a watercourse require a permit from the TRCA. Currently, works such as garden sheds, decks, inground pools, tennis courts on residential properties and minor municipal servicing/utilities projects within a Fill Regulated Area are subject to the same approval process and review time (30 to 60 days) as larger scale proposals such as draft plans of subdivisions.

Recent changes to the Building Code include a reduced permit issuance time to as short as 10 days for Part 9 buildings (ex. houses). Since April 2000, the City of Toronto has used a fast track approval system for additions up to 50 square metres, decks, garages/carports, accessory structures, pool enclosures and other minor works. The objective of the fast track system is to expedite permit issuance for works considered by the city to be minor and straight forward.

RATIONALE Service Delivery As outlined in the TRCA 2003 - 2007 Business Plan, Business Excellence is one of the corporation's key objectives. Through this initiative, a key goal of the Development Services Section is to improve and streamline the administration of plan review regulation compliance. On July 25, 2003, the Executive Committee approved a streamlined process for minor landscaping as a first step in reaching the strategic objective outlined in the Business Plan. The proposed streamlined process for minor works is a further initiative to achieve efficient and effective client service.

The Development Services Section has been experiencing ongoing complaints from applicants with proposals that are minor and require straight forward site approvals but are delayed in receiving a permit for several weeks due to Executive Committee schedules. With the proposed streamlined approach, staff will conduct the same thorough review of these minor applications but will be able to issue approvals faster. Staff will ensure that all applications that do not fall into this category are subject to the relevant review and negotiation process and that these applications will be brought forward to the Executive Committee for consideration and approval.

Generic Regulation In an effort to streamline the regulatory framework of the development approval process a number of changes were made to the Conservation Authorities Act (CAA) in 1998. Pursuant to Section 28, the proposed Generic Regulation will provide a context for consistency across the province. Under the Generic Regulation, conservation authorities (CAs) are required to establish a development and alteration regulation. As part of the Generic Regulation conformity process, CAs will have the ability to exempt areas or types of development from the permit approvals process. The changes to Section 28(2) of the CAA also allows for the delegation of powers under to the regulation to the Executive Committee or to any other person or body subject to any limitations and requirements that may be set out in the regulation. The Generic Regulation has yet to be passed by the Ontario Legislature. It is anticipated that this will happen in early 2004. The proposed minor works delegation is an initiative proposed by staff in anticipation of the new requirements of the Generic Regulation.

752 Other Conservation Authorities Several other CAs have implemented processes to streamline the permit approval process by either exempting minor works that would normally require a permit or delegating staff with approval authority to issue permits. In the Golden Horseshoe area, Credit Valley Conservation (CVC), Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) and Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority (CLOCA) have the most extensive exemptions/delegations. While the process used at each CA varies, the intent of the program remains consistent: to exclude/approve those minor applications considered not to affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land.

Implementation Approvals of minor works would be implemented by Development Services Section staff. The proposed minor works would be subject to the normal permit application review and associated fee collection process. Staff would screen the application to determine if the proposal qualifies as minor works and complies with provincial policies and TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP). Staff would prepare a report, similar to reports presented to the Executive Committee, outlining the rationale and justification for the approval of the minor works. The permit of minor works would be subject to authorization by the Manager of Development Services and signed by an appointed enforcement officer. Staff would prepare a monthly report listing approved works for ratification by the Executive Committee.

Defining Minor Works All eligible works must be located within a Fill Regulated Area, outside of the floodplain and in the opinion of staff not affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land. Eligible minor works for the streamlined permit approval process would be consistent with the following list: z fill placement or regrading of fill less than 30 cubic metres (the equivalent of 3 truckloads) z minor additions up to 50 square metres (500 square feet) z non-habitable accessory structures up to 50 square metres (500 square feet) such as garden/storage sheds, detached garages, cabanas and workshops. Also ancillary works such as decks, gazebos, patios and fencing. z miscellaneous municipal and utility projects such as directional drilling and associated bore pits, signage, hydro poles, etc. z retaining walls up to 1.0 metre in height and 15 metres (50 feet) in length z inground swimming pools z emergency works z temporary installations and maintenance procedures

Where any works noted above are considered by staff to be contrary to TRCA policies, or there are significant environmental issues, or where staff is aware of community or third party concerns, a report on the application will be forwarded to the Executive Committee for review and approval, as per the existing procedures.

753 Summary The intent of the proposed changes is to provide a streamlined, expeditious and efficient review and approval of works that are minor in nature and will not adversely affect the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Notification to municipal building departments regarding the new permit approval process and modification of internal permit issuance and report format.

Report prepared by: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281 For information contact: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281 Date: November 5, 2003

______

RES.#B165/03 - ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD APPEALS Draft Plans of Subdivisions, Springdale Secondary Plan Area City of Brampton, Etobicoke and Humber Watersheds. Authorization for staff to represent the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) with Party Status at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing regarding several residential plans of subdivision appeals in the Springdale Secondary Plan Area in the City of Brampton as related to matters of TRCA interest in the proposed developments.

Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT staff be directed to represent the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority with Party Status at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing in the matter of development appeals in the Springdale Secondary Plan Area in the City of Brampton;

THAT staff continue to pursue the resolution of TRCA interests in cooperation with the relevant parties and/or participants prior to the Hearing;

AND FURTHER THAT staff be directed to retain legal services for any necessary representation on these matters. CARRIED BACKGROUND Nine development applications within an area in north Brampton known as the Springdale Secondary Plan area have been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). The area is bound on the north by Countryside Drive, Airport Road to the east, Bovaird Drive to the south and Heart Lake Road to the west. The proponents appealed their applications to the OMB based on the failure of the City of Brampton to make a decision respecting the proposed plans of subdivision. The OMB Hearing was broken into two phases with the first phase being held in the spring of 2003. At issue in the first phase of the Hearing was the development cap imposed by the Region of Peel and the City of Brampton on the basis that the existing road 754 network is no longer capable of accommodating further growth in the Springdale area. The Board ruled through OMB Decision Order #0869 that there is sufficient transportation capacity to accommodate all of the applications before the board, with the exception of one application known as Senator Homes. In a subsequent Pre-hearing held on October 16, 2003, new evidence was introduced by the proponent with the support of the region and the City of Brampton, for the Board to reconsider its decision on the Senator Homes. The Board did grant that on the basis of the evidence provided that there was capacity for the Senator Homes application to be considered.

Phase 2 of the OMB Hearing deals with the other details of the development applications and it is with this phase of the Hearing process that the TRCA has an interest. A pre-hearing for Phase 2 of the OMB Hearing was held on September 15, 2003, to identify the issues for the Phase 2 Hearing. The following is a summary of the TRCA's interest in the development applications.

RATIONALE Senator Homes The proposed 357 unit draft residential plan of subdivision is located in the southwesterly portion of the Springdale area, north of Bovaird Drive between Heart Lake Road and the future Highway 410 extension. This application was initially circulated in 2001 and the TRCA has reviewed various technical reports over the course of the intervening years. To date the TRCA has not been in a position to provide Conditions of Draft Plan Approval as our concerns have not been adequately addressed. The TRCA's interests with the development of this site relate to the protection of the provincially significant Heart Lake Wetland areas on the property in the post development condition. Further revisions to the Environmental Impact Study and Functional Servicing Report are necessary to address our last comments of July 25, 2002.

Urban & Country Development Ltd. The proposed 660 unit residential draft plan of subdivision is located in the northeasterly portion of the Springdale area, south of Countryside Drive and west of Bramalea Road. This application was initially circulated in 2001 and TRCA staff has conducted site meetings and reviewed various technical reports over the course of the intervening years. To date TRCA staff have not been in a position to provide Conditions of Draft Plan Approval as our concerns have not been adequately addressed. The TRCA's interests with the development of this site relate to the provision of geotechnical information to establish the limits of development, vegetation restoration plan of previously disturbed significant vegetation, stormwater management and the design details of a collector road crossing of the valley corridor in a location predetermined in the secondary plan process. Further revisions to the Stormwater Management Report and Geotechnical Report are necessary to address our last comments of June 12, 2003. To date we have not received information on the restoration plan or the design details of the valley crossing.

755 Airport/Countryside Developments Group Seven residential draft plans of subdivisions (combined total of approximately 519 units) are located in the northeasterly portion of the Springdale area, south of Countryside Drive and west of Airport Road. Two of the draft plans of subdivision were previously circulated to the TRCA and Conditions of Draft Plan Approval were recommended to the City of Brampton. Five new draft plans of subdivisions were circulated to the TRCA in the spring of 2003. To date the TRCA has not been in a position to provide Conditions of Draft Plan Approval on the five new applications as our concerns have not be adequately addressed. The TRCA's interest with the proposed development relate to the protection of a significant woodlot feature, the valley corridor and significant vegetation, the establishment of development limits, stormwater management and the details of the road crossing of the valley. With the exception of a recently submitted Environmental Impact Study of the woodlot, the TRCA has not received the requisite environmental and servicing studies as per our comments of July 14, 2003 and August 30, 2003.

DETAILS OF WORK TO BE DONE Course of Action In the series of pre-hearings held prior to the Phase 1 OMB Hearing, TRCA staff monitored the procedures with participant status. TRCA staff consulted with City of Brampton staff and legal counsel and it was decided that the City of Brampton would retain TRCA staff as a witness with regard to the environmental issues of concern during Phase 2 of the Hearing. It should be noted that in all of these development applications, staff are applying standard review practices as they relate to TRCA programs and policies. Furthermore, in all applications it is a matter of the proponents providing the appropriate technical documentation to address our concerns in order for the TRCA to issue Conditions of Draft Plan Approval.

Prior to the commencement of the first Phase 2 Pre-hearing, TRCA staff consulted with City of Brampton legal counsel and as a result of these discussions, it was recommended that rather than teaming with Brampton as their witness, the TRCA should request Party Status and obtain legal counsel in order to protect our issues. On this basis, TRCA staff did request and was granted Party Status by the OMB. In an effort to reduce our costs and share resources, TRCA staff have retained the same legal counsel representing the Region of Peel planning department in Phase 2 of the Hearing. All efforts will continue to be made to resolve outstanding issues prior the initiation of the Phase 2 Hearing scheduled to commence on January 19, 2004.

CONCLUSION Based upon the rationale and explanation noted above, it is recommended that staff be authorized to represent the TRCA's interests with Party Status before the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing on the appeals within the Springdale Secondary Plan Area and that these positions be maintained with legal representation. Staff will continue to pursue the resolution of TRCA interests with the affected parties.

Report prepared by: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281 For Information contact: Laurie Nelson, extension 5281 Date: November 5, 2003 ______

756 RES.#B166/03 - APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Steve Heuchert. Appointment of Enforcement Officer to administer Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways Regulation (Ontario Regulation 158).

Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT Steve Heuchert be appointed as an Enforcement Officer for the purpose of enforcing Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterway Regulations (Ontario Regulation 158) made by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, pursuant to Section 28 of the Conservation Authorities Act. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Conservation Authorities Act provides for a conservation authority to appoint Enforcement Officers to enforce its regulations. There are several TRCA staff who currently have this designation, both for the purpose of enforcing TRCA's regulations and for authorizing the issuance of permits approved by the Executive Committee under the regulation.

RATIONALE Mr. Steve Heuchert has recently been appointed to the position of Senior Planner within the Development Services Section. In this position, he has the responsibility for supervising the TRCA’s regulation services associated with the review and approval of applications. The appointment as Enforcement Officer will enable him to authorize the issuance of approvals for the work that he supervises and will allow him to assist with the enforcement of the regulation as required.

Report prepared by: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Date: October 8, 2003

______

RES.#B167/03 - TERRESTRIAL NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Planning Consultant Selection. Further retain a planning consultant to facilitate articulation of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program into a planning framework.

Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Irene Jones

757 THAT Anthony Usher be further retained by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority at an upset limit of $20,000 (net of GST) to facilitate discussions, provide expert planning advice, edit and write draft sections during Phase 2 of the development of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Strategy. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program has been noted as one of the key components of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) vision for The Living City. Achievement of The Living City vision requires the crafting and implementation of a policy framework which reflects the complexities of the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Program, as summarized in the Terrestrial Natural Heritage Strategy.

To date, drafting these policies has been a collaborative effort of TRCA staff and an expert external consultant, Anthony Usher. During Phase 1 of the strategy's development, Mr. Usher acted as a facilitator who provided expert advice and opinion, and facilitated discussions. The details of Mr. Usher's contract during Phase 1 are described in the minutes of the May 2, 2003 Executive Commitee Meeting. The final product of Phase 1 was a completed table of contents and a working document which captured discussions and staff submissions during Phase 1 and was received on July 11, 2003.

Since then, TRCA staff have been working with Mr. Usher on Phase 2 using the remainder of the funds from Phase 1 (Phase 1 was completed under budget). The final product of Phase 2 will be a preliminary TNH Strategy, including a set of policies that is ready for Authority review by early 2004. Mr. Usher's role in Phase 2 will be to write sections of the TNH Strategy and edit other sections submitted by TRCA staff into one complete document, and to facilitate meetings as required.

Phase 3 of the strategy's development will occur in 2004 and will involve consultation with municipal partners, stakeholders and the public whose comments will be worked into the final version of the TNH Strategy. It is anticipated that Mr. Usher may be retained on a per diem basis as assistance is needed in this phase.

RATIONALE Because of Mr. Usher’s critical involvement in Phase 1 it is recommended that he be further retained for Phase 2 of the development of the draft TNH Strategy. Beyond his excellent work during Phase 1 of the TNH Strategy, Mr. Usher has additional expertise from his work in resource based management planning for both the province and as a consultant to private industry. Mr. Usher is also a well known and respected member of the planning community and has served as President of the Ontario Professional Planners Institute from 1992-1994.

Report prepared by: Scott Jones, extension 5383 For Information contact: Carolyn Woodland, extension 5214 Date: October 17, 2003

______

758 RES.#B168/03 - FLOODLINE MAPPING UPDATE FOR THE MAIN HUMBER RIVER WATERSHED WITHIN THE REGION OF YORK Approval to retain Acres International Limited to complete a floodline mapping update of twelve (12) existing analogue floodline map sheets and three (3) new map sheets, for portions of the Main Humber River within the Region of York.

Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority enter into an agreement with Acres International Limited to complete the floodline mapping update for twelve (12) existing analogue floodline map sheets and three (3) new map sheets within the Humber River watershed for a maximum upset limit of $30,000 (excluding GST). CARRIED BACKGROUND One of the main objectives identified within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and mapped information for use by the TRCA and others, and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order to continue to provide accurate flood plain management information, the Watershed Management Division has prepared a Flood Plain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific requirements necessary to update the TRCA's current Flood and Fill Line Regulation Mapping. Priority watersheds identified within the work plan include the Humber River given the extent of previous, current and future development activities.

This project involves updating 12 existing Humber River floodline maps, originally prepared in the late 1970's. The proposed works will require the conversion of the existing HEC-2 hydraulic model to an updated windows based HEC-Ras model for the 12 existing analogue sheets and preparation of a new HEC-Ras model for the 3 new floodline map sheets. The new hydraulic software will improve modelling and data management capabilities and permit TRCA staff to provide accurate, up-to-date flood plain information required for regulation purposes.

RATIONALE The four consultants listed below were invited to submit proposals for the project based upon a Request For Proposal (RFP) which detailed the proposed study. An upset limit of $30,000 (exclusive of GST) was established for the project.

• Acres International Limited $29,750 (exclusive of GST) • Valdor Engineering Inc. $29,825 (exclusive of GST) • Sernas Associates $29,423 (exclusive of GST) • MacViro Consultants Inc. $30,000 (exclusive of GST)

759 TRCA staff reviewed the submitted proposals and selected Acres International Limited to carry out the proposed study. This selection was based upon the consultants’ submission of a fee proposal for consulting services which best satisfied the set of written selection criteria as developed by TRCA in advance of the selection process. The criteria included the requirement to have previous experience in the area of floodline mapping and familiarity with state-of-the-art approaches. The successful proposal offered the best approach to the work. Staff are confident that the chosen consultant will conduct the required tasks in a timely and efficient manner.

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds required to complete the project are available from the Region of York in account 127-05.

Report prepared by: Alison MacLennan, extension 5613 For Information contact: Steve Hollingworth, extension 5278 Date: October 30, 2003

______

RES.#B169/03 - FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING AND SPECIAL POLICY AREA UPDATE FOR THE DUFFINS CREEK WATERSHED Approval to retain JD Barnes Ltd. to produce three (3) new topographic base maps for Duffins Creek in order to facilitate the update and management of Flood and Fill Regulation Line Mapping and update of the Lower Duffins SPA.

Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the Toronto and Region Consrvation Authority enter into an agreement with J.D. Barnes Ltd. to produce new 1:2,000 scale base mapping for Duffins Creek Floodplain Map Sheets 4, 5 and 6 with a maximum upset limit of $10,500 (excluding GST). CARRIED BACKGROUND One of the main objectives identified within the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) is to maintain and provide current hydrologic, hydraulic and mapped information for use by the TRCA and others, and to incorporate improved technologies as they become available. In keeping with the intent of the VSCMP, and in order to continue to provide accurate floodplain management information, the Watershed Management Division has prepared a Floodplain Management Work Plan to identify watershed specific requirements necessary to update the TRCA’s current Flood and Fill Line Regulation Mapping. The Duffins Creek was identified as a priority watershed in the work plan due to the extent of previous, current and future development activities.

760 The floodplain mapping update for the Lower Duffins Creek was completed in 2002. It was determined that the most cost-effective method of completing the project was to scan and vectorize existing base maps. However, due to extensive development within the existing Special Policy Area, comprising map sheets 4, 5 and 6, it is recommended that the base mapping be updated to reflect current conditions. The updated base mapping will facilitate the completion of updated floodlines and flood level information which will be used to refine the limits of the Special Policy Area where necessary, and to confirm minimum flood proofing requirements for future developments.

Due to their new 2002 orthophotography and digital elevation model (DEM) for the area, as well as extensive knowledge of the TRCA’s digital mapping specifications required to ensure proper integration with existing maps, J.D. Barnes will be able to offer time and cost savings. As such, it is recommended that J.D. Barnes be retained to prepare the 3 new topographic map sheets.

FINANCIAL DETAILS The total cost for preparation of 3 new topographic map sheets is $10,500 (excluding GST) and is available in account 113-26.

Report prepared by: Thomas Dole, extension 5611 For Information contact: Glenn Farmer, extension 5351 Date: October 22, 2003 ______

RES.#B170/03 - ACQUISITION OF VEHICLE Acquisition of vehicle 4 X 4 Quad Cab Pick Up Truck

Moved by: Gerri Lynn O'Connor Seconded by: Maria Augimeri

THAT the tender FM 2003-06 for a 4 X 4 Quad Cab Pick up truck be awarded to Ontario Plymouth Chrysler for the sum of $31,431.80 it being the lowest price that meets the Authority's specifications. CARRIED BACKGROUND The Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Policy and Procedures for the Purchase of Goods and Services and Disposal of Equipment requires Executive Committee approval for selection of successful tenders for acquisitions between $25,000 and $100,000.

The members of the Tender Opening Sub-Committee at their meeting opened tenders for the vehicles on October 3, 2003. The tenders were referred to staff for their review and report to the Executive Committee.

761 Tender Opening Sub Committee Report - FM 2003-06, 4 X 4 Quad Cab Pick Up Truck

COMPANY QUOTE Ontario Plymouth Chrysler Ltd. $31,431.80 Brampton Chrysler $31,671.00 Colombo Chrysler Dodge Limited $31,753.80 Downsview Chrysler $32,253.55

FINANCIAL DETAILS Funding for this acquisition will be charged to Account 701-11-404

Report prepared by: Jim Tucker, extension 5247 For Information contact: Jim Tucker, extension 5247 Date: November 04, 2003

______

NEW BUSINESS RES.#B171/03 - ASIAN LONGHORNED BEETLE (ALHB)

Moved by: Michael Di Biase Seconded by: Dick O'Brien

WHEREAS the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) commends the federal government and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) for acting swiftly to address and control the currently identified infestation of the Asian Longhorned Beetle;

WHEREAS the CFIA (Act) does not include provisions for replanting areas where tree removal is undertaken;

WHEREAS the methods to be implemented for control of the infestation of the ALHB will result in the devastation of an extensive portion of the urban forest within the cities of Toronto and Vaughan;

THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT the TRCA call on the Prime Minister of Canada and the Premier of Ontario to allocate funding for the purpose of replanting areas, including public and private lands, that have been affected through the removal of these trees;

THAT every effort be made to make funds available so the replanting can begin in the spring of 2004;

AND FURTHER THAT consideration be given to declaring this an area of special federal and provincial concern or other mechanism that may assist in accessing the critical funds necessary. CARRIED 762 TERMINATION

ON MOTION, the meeting terminated at 12:28 p.m., on Friday, November 14, 2003.

Dick O'Brien Brian Denney Chair Secretary-Treasurer

/ks

763