DOCSLIB.ORG

BIBLIOGRAPHY on MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION Trevor Hunt August 2020 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BIBLIOGRAPHY on MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION Trevor Hunt August 2020 1 ICCLR International Centre for Criminal Law Reform BIBLIOGRAPHY ON MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION Trevor Hunt August 2020 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Methodological Note ...................................................................................................................... 5 Canada............................................................................................................................................. 6 Legislation................................................................................................................................... 6 Journals, Books & Other Sources ............................................................................................... 7 Case Law & Principles of Sentencing,, ..................................................................................... 10 Case Law – s.123 – Municipal Corruption ........................................................................... 10 Principles of Sentencing – s.123 ........................................................................................... 12 Case Law – s.122 – Breach of Trust by Public Officer ........................................................ 13 Principles of Sentencing – s.122 ........................................................................................... 14 International .................................................................................................................................. 16 General ...................................................................................................................................... 16 Global Infrastructure Anti-Corruption Centre .......................................................................... 19 OECD ........................................................................................................................................ 19 Transparency International ....................................................................................................... 20 UN ............................................................................................................................................. 21 U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre ....................................................................................... 21 North America .............................................................................................................................. 23 United States ............................................................................................................................. 23 Mexico ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Europe ........................................................................................................................................... 27 General ...................................................................................................................................... 27 Albania ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Bosnia ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Bulgaria ..................................................................................................................................... 29 Croatia ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Georgia ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Germany .................................................................................................................................... 29 Greece ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Finland ...................................................................................................................................... 30 France ........................................................................................................................................ 30 2 Iceland ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Italy ........................................................................................................................................... 31 Latvia ........................................................................................................................................ 33 Macedonia ................................................................................................................................. 34 Norway ...................................................................................................................................... 34 Netherlands ............................................................................................................................... 35 Spain ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Sweden ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Portugal ..................................................................................................................................... 39 Russia ........................................................................................................................................ 39 Ukraine ...................................................................................................................................... 40 United Kingdom........................................................................................................................ 41 South America .............................................................................................................................. 44 Argentina................................................................................................................................... 44 Brazil ......................................................................................................................................... 44 Colombia ................................................................................................................................... 46 Nicaragua .................................................................................................................................. 46 Asia ............................................................................................................................................... 47 China ......................................................................................................................................... 47 Hong Kong ................................................................................................................................ 48 Indonesia ................................................................................................................................... 50 India .......................................................................................................................................... 50 Japan ......................................................................................................................................... 52 Malaysia .................................................................................................................................... 52 Pakistan ..................................................................................................................................... 53 Palestine .................................................................................................................................... 53 South Korea .............................................................................................................................. 53 Thailand .................................................................................................................................... 54 Africa ............................................................................................................................................ 55 General ...................................................................................................................................... 55 Ghana ........................................................................................................................................ 55 Kenya ........................................................................................................................................ 56 Malawi ...................................................................................................................................... 56 3 Senegal ...................................................................................................................................... 56 South Africa .............................................................................................................................. 56 Zambia .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Search of Corruption Funds
    In Search of Corruption Funds A comparative study of country practices prepared in fulfillment of the Advanced Research Project The Graduate Institute, Geneva, Fall 2016 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ iii Acronyms and abbreviations ............................................................................ iv Executive Summary ........................................................................................... v Strategic recommendations ............................................................................ viii Technical recommendations ............................................................................. ix Part I: Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 Ia. Overview of the problem ............................................................................. 1 Part II: Research Overview ............................................................................... 3 IIa. Research questions and key assumptions .................................................... 4 IIb. Methodology .............................................................................................. 5 Part III. Common law practice ......................................................................... 7 IIIa. The United States .................................................................................... 7 Overview .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Climate Statement 2015
    SWEDEN INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENT 2015 U.S. Department of State 2015 Investment Climate Statement | May 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Openness To, and Restrictions Upon, Foreign Investment 1.1. Attitude Toward FDI 1.2. Other Investment Policy Reviews 1.3. Laws/Regulations of FDI 1.4. Industrial Strategy 1.5. Limits on Foreign Control 1.6. Privatization Program 1.7. Screening of FDI 1.8. Competition Law 1.9. Investment Trends 1.9.1. Tables 1 and if applicable, Table 1B 2. Conversion and Transfer Policies 2.1. Foreign Exchange 2.1.1. Remittance Policies 3. Expropriation and Compensation 4. Dispute Settlement 4.1. Legal System, Specialized Courts, Judicial Independence, Judgments of Foreign Courts 4.2. Bankruptcy 4.3. Investment Disputes 4.4. International Arbitration 4.4.1. ICSID Convention and New York Convention 4.5. Duration of Dispute Resolution 5. Performance Requirements and Investment Incentives 5.1. WTO/TRIMS 5.2. Investment Incentives 5.2.1. Research and Development 5.3. 5.3 Performance Requirements 5.4. Data Storage 6. Right to Private Ownership and Establishment 1 U.S. Department of State 2015 Investment Climate Statement | May 2015 7. Protection of Property Rights 7.1. Real Property 7.2. Intellectual Property Rights 8. Transparency of the Regulatory System 9. Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment 9.1. Money and Banking System, Hostile Takeovers 10. Competition from State-Owned Enterprises 10.1. OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of SOEs 10.2. Sovereign Wealth Funds 11. Corporate Social Responsibility 11.1. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 12. Political Violence 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive summary Why study corruption in Sweden? The fact that Sweden does well in international corruption surveys cannot be taken to imply that corruption does not exist or that corruption is not a problem in Sweden. While a social problem may be relatively less severe in one country than in another, this says nothing about the actual extent of the problem. Quite apart from whether the problem is a relatively major or minor one, knowledge about corruption in Sweden needs to be developed. Without knowledge of the nature of corruption in Sweden, it is difficult to prevent and combat it. The purpose of this report is to summarise and update the research that has been conducted on corruption in Sweden, present some previously unpublished opinion data and draw attention to several neglected areas in studies of Swedish corruption. We do this by answering a number of questions about the extent of corruption in modern Sweden, developments over time, and its causes and consequences. We also discuss measures and strategies for combating corruption. A significant portion of the data presented in this report was developed within the research project Tillit och korruption i lokalpolitiken (‘Trust and corruption in local politics’, funded by the Swedish Research Council) in which the authors are involved. Our main arguments and conclusions on corruption in Sweden can be summarised in six points. Corruption problems should be broadly defined. In Sweden, corruption has traditionally been defined in narrow legal terms with a focus on bribery. Instead, we believe that corruption should be defined broadly and in the context of unethical behaviour and abuse of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption and the Global Economy
    10 Corruption as an International Policy Problem: Overview and Recommendations KIMBERLY ANN ELLIOTT In just a few months in early 1997, Mexico fired its top drug-enforcement official for accepting bribes and ultimately closed the agency because it was so ridden with corruption; Ukraines president once again declared war on corruption; Chinese Prime Minister Li Peng lamented that his country was losing ground in its war on corruption; President Kim Young Sam deplored endemic corruption in South Korea; Russian Interior Min- ister Anatoly Kulikov pledged to crack down on corruption and the gray economy; Pakistans voters, disillusioned by perceptions of widespread corruption, stayed away from the polls in droves; and public schools in Washington were alleged to be rife with cronyism and nepotism. Corruption scandals in recent years have also contributed to the downfall of governments in Ecuador, Brazil, Italy, and India. Long-entrenched ruling parties have been weakened, including Japans Liberal Democratic Party and Mexicos Institutional Revolutionary Party. In the United States, two decades after the Watergate scandals prompted new rules regard- ing political contributions and the passage of the Foreign Corrupt Prac- tices Act (FCPA), campaign finance reform has reemerged as a major political issue. The number, variety, and importance of countries experiencing corrup- tion scandals highlight both the complexity of this phenomenon and its prominence as a global issue. When it is pervasive and uncontrolled, corruption thwarts economic development and undermines political le- gitimacy. Less pervasive variants result in wasted resources, increased inequity in resource distribution, less political competition, and greater distrust of government. Creating and exploiting opportunities for bribery 175 Institute for International Economics | http://www.iie.com at high levels of government also increases the cost of government, dis- torts the allocation of government spending, and may dangerously lower the quality of infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Impartiality and Corruption in Sweden
    IMPARTIALITY AND CORRUPTION IN SWEDEN CARL DAHLSTRÖM ANDERS SUNDELL WORKING PAPER SERIES 2013:14 QOG THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Box 711, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG October 2013 ISSN 1653-8919 © 2013 by Carl Dahlström & Anders Sundell. All rights reserved. Impartiality and Corruption in Sweden Carl Dahlström and Anders Sundell QoG Working Paper Series 2013:14 October 2013 ISSN 1653-8919 ABSTRACT This paper presents data on corruption and impartiality from a unique survey with local politicians in Sweden, which includes answers from about 78 percent of the 13 361 politicians active in the 290 Swedish municipalities. On the basis of a number of questions related to impartiality and corruption, and after checking for respondent perception bias, we construct three indices: one bri- bery index, one partiality index and one recruitment index. The paper also assesses the external validity of these indices, using previous surveys, crime statistics and media reports on corruption. Our main conclusion after these analyses is that the indices hold water, and thus that it is wort- hwhile to include them in future, more explanatory studies on both causes and consequences of corruption and impartiality in Sweden. Carl Dahlström Anders Sundell The Quality of Government Institute The Quality of Government Institute Department of Political Science Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg University of Gothenburg Carl.dahlströ[email protected] [email protected] 2 Introduction Sweden is one of the countries with the lowest corruption levels in the world and is also much cleaner from corruption than it used to be (Rothstein and Teorell 2012; Transparency International 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60
    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption and State Instability in West Africa: an Examination of Policy Options
    Corruption and State Instability in West Africa: An Examination of Policy Options By Samuel Mondays ATUOBI KAIPTC Occasional Paper No.--, December 2007 1 1. INTRODUCTION Corruption represents a threat “…to the stability and security of societies, undermining the institutions of democracy, ethical values and justice and jeopardizing sustainable development and the rule of law”. – Preamble to the UN Convention on Corruption Since their inception, West African states have been facing corruption as a major problem. In some cases, it has attained levels of gross and egregious theft, for which no possible moral or historical justification can be advanced, and which has played a major role, both in the impoverishment of the region as a whole and specifically in the alienation of its people from their rulers.1 The existence of widespread corruption, especially in societies beset by mass poverty and very high levels of unemployment, has a deeply corrosive effect on trust in government and 2 contributes to crime and political disorder. In the political realm, corruption undermines democracy and good governance by flouting or even subverting formal processes. Corruption in legislative bodies reduces accountability and distorts representation in policymaking; corruption in the judiciary compromises the rule of law; and corruption in public administration results in the unequal distribution of services. More generally, corruption erodes the institutional capacity of government as procedures are disregarded, resources are siphoned off, and public offices are bought and sold.3 At the extreme, unbridled corruption can lead to state fragility and destructive conflict, and plunge a state into “unremitting cycle of institutional anarchy and violence”.4 In as much as corruption destroys the legitimacy of government in the eyes of those who can do something about the situation, it contributes to instability.
    [Show full text]
  • Anuari De La Càtedra Ramon Llull Blanquerna 2019 Ars
    2019 εἰρήνη (éirênê) als Testaments dels Dotze Patriarques (TestXIIPa). (Addenda sobre shalom). Rosa M. Boixareu ANUARI DE LA CÀTEDRA RAMON LLULL BLANQUERNA 2019 Liberating intelligence. Breaking away from domination societies – 25 towards new creative democracies. Jaume Agustí-Cullell Influencia de los idealismos griego y alemán en dos conceptos marxistas: alienación e ideología. Ricard Casadesús Antropologia a l’Antic Testament. “Què és l’home perquè te’n recordis?” SL 8,5. Jaume Duran i Navarro Civilització i barbàrie. La tasca cultural en la construcció d’una civilització humanitzada. Albert Llorca Arimany Kwame Nkrumah i el projecte panafricà. Francesc-Xavier Marín i Torné Igor Stravinsky. Un collage. Jordi Membrado Amela 25 25 On the living being of visual creation. Humberto Ortega-Villaseñor Mitos del deporte español. Jordi Osúa Quintana El cuerpo en la filosofía: las etapas del discurso filosófico sobre el cuerpo en occidente. Héctor Salinas Fuentes i Miquel Amorós Hernández «Ya no hay judío ni griego» (Gál 3, 28): la trascendencia cultural de la ciudadanía romana en Pablo de Tarso. José María Sanz Acera El transhumanisme o una societat amb ànima. 2019 DE LA CÀTEDRA RAMON LLULL BLANQUERNA ANUARI José Luis Vázquez Borau Notes on boredom and metaphysics, sociologically framed. Jacobo Zabalo Tolstoi i Zweig, dos pensadors i un destí: la fugida vers la mort. Conrad Vilanou, Clara Domènech i Ferran Sánchez ARS BREVIS Coberta_Ars Brevis_25.indd 1 201929/5/20 10:50 ai159065841459_página flor.pdf 1 28/5/20 11:33 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Ars_Brevis_25.indd 1 29/5/20 9:53 Ars_Brevis_25.indd 2 29/5/20 9:53 Ars Brevis ANUARI 2019 Càtedra Ramon Llull Blanquerna Barcelona, 2020 Ars_Brevis_25.indd 3 29/5/20 9:53 Ars_Brevis_25.indd 4 29/5/20 9:53 Director Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Data and the Fight Against Corruption in France
    OPEN DATA AND THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN FRANCE Transparency International is a global movement with one vision: a world in which government, business, civil society and the daily lives of people are free of corruption. With more than 100 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, we are leading the fight against corruption to turn this vision into reality. www.transparency.org Authors: Myriam Savy Design: Daniela Cristofori © Cover photo: Shutterstock Ekaphon Maneechot Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of November 2016. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. This research was conducted in cooperation with the World Wide Web Foundation. Established by the inventor of the web, the World Wide Web Foundation works for digital equality for all. For more, please visit webfoundation.org. ISBN: 978-3-96076-037-5 Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 © Transparency International 2017. Some rights reserved. CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 Key Findings 5 Preface 6 Methodology 7 Anti-Corruption Datasets 8 Country Overview: Open Data and Corruption in France 10 Implementation of the G20 Principles 14 Principle 1: Open Data by Default 16 Principle 2: Timely and Comprehensive Data 18 Principle 3: Accessible and Usable Data 20 Principle 4: Comparable and Interoperable Data 21 Principle 5: Data for Improved Governance and Citizen Engagement 22 Principle 6: Data for Inclusive Development and Innovation 24 Sectoral Use Case 26 How to get Anti-Corruption Data Published 27 Conclusions and Recommendations 28 Key Recommendations 29 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For the last five years France has shown Anti-corruption continues not to be a main driver of French open data policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Corruption in Ghana
    OVERVIEW OF CORRUPTION IN GHANA QUERY SUMMARY We would like to have an overview of corruption Since its return to democratic rule in 1993, Ghana and anti-corruption in Ghana. We would appreciate has made progress in consolidating its democracy to have an analysis on corruption trends and the and is often referred to as a success story of extent to which the anti-corruption system is democratisation in Africa. Several administrations working. since Ghana’s return to multi-party democracy have declared their commitment to curbing PURPOSE corruption. Despite Ghana being portrayed as an example of democracy in Africa, 2013 has been a critical year As a result, the legal framework against corruption for Ghana, i.e. petition court following the elections, has been strengthened and efforts have been fiscal deficit, and more corruption cases reported in made to simplify many bureaucratic procedures in the media, among others. order to make the government more efficient and reduce the risks of corruption. Several anti- CONTENT corruption bodies have been established since the 1. Background 1990s, such as the Commission on Human Rights 2. Overview of Corruption in Ghana and Administrative Justice, the Economic and 3. Anti-Corruption Strategies and Measures Organised Crime Office, the Public Procurement 4. References Authority and the Policy Evaluation and Oversight Unit. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ Despite these efforts, there are still important gaps Author(s): Roberto Martínez B. Kukutschka, in the legal framework and the country continues to [email protected] face corruption challenges. For example, the Freedom of Information Law is still pending in Reviewer(s): Marie Chêne, Transparency International parliament and corruption is still widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Quality of Government and Subnational Variation"
    "MEASURING THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT AND SUBNATIONAL VARIATION" Report for the European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy Directorate Policy Development The following report has been prepared by the research team at the Quality of Government Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg Sweden December 2010 MEASURING THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT AND SUBNATIONAL VARIATION Table of Contents Page Authors and acknowledgements 4 Table of figures and tables 5 Project Overview 8 Executive Summary (short version) 9 Executive Summary (long version) 17 Part Ia: Introduction and Review of the Literature 56 1. Defining Quality of Government 57 2. Some EU Countries Better Than Others 60 3. Consequences of QoG: How QoG Affects Social Well-being 63 Part Ib: Existing National Indicators of QoG 67 Leading measures of QoG 68 Single Source vs. Composite Source Indicators 70 Expert vs. Random/ Representative Surveys 72 Analysis and Evaluation of Current National QoG Indicators 74 QoG Concept 1: Rule of Law 74 QoG Concept 2: Corruption 79 QoG Concept 3: Quality of the Bureaucracy 83 QoG Concept 4: Democracy & Strength of Electoral Institutions 86 Conclusions 91 Part II: Evaluation of the World Bank Data 92 1. Overview of the Data and the Rankings for EU Member States 92 2. Internal Consistency of the Data 93 3. Impact of the 4 Pillars on the Overall Index of QoG 98 4. Cluster Analysis 99 5. Uncertainly and Sensitivity Analyses 101 Pillar 1: Rule of Law (RL) 104 Pillar 2: Government Effectiveness (GE) 106 Pillar 3: Control of Corruption 108 Pillar 4: Voice & Accountability (VA) 110 6. External Validity: Examining Correlates of the Index 112 Conclusions 117 Part III: Measuring QoG at the Regional Level 120 Description of the Survey Data: Individual Level 120 The Survey Questions 121 Respondent Demographics 127 Building the QoG Regional Index: Multivariate Analysis 131 1.
    [Show full text]
  • France's Anti-Corruption Strategy in Its Cooperation Action (2021-2030)
    Strategy Report France’s Anti-Corruption Strategy in Its Cooperation Action (2021-2030) This strategy was jointly drafted by the: • Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs (MEAE); • Ministry of the Economy, Finance and the Recovery (MEFR); • Ministry of Justice (MINJUST); • Ministry of the Interior (MININT); • French Anti-Corruption Authority (AFA); • Cour des Comptes; • High Authority for Transparency in Public Life (HATVP); • Agence Française de Développement Group (AFD and Expertise France); • Canal France International (CFI); • General Secretariat for European Affairs (SGAE). This document is available online on the France Diplomatie website: www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en All rights of adaptation, translation and reproduction by all means, including photocopies and microfilm, are reserved for all countries. Strategy report France’s Anti-Corruption Strategy in Its Cooperation Action 2021-2030 Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs - DGM 3 Table of contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1 Issues, background, scope and implementation .............................................................. 9 1.1 Issues ............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.2 Background ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]