DOCSLIB.ORG

Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism: Yasuda Rijin and the Shin Buddhist Tradition'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism: Yasuda Rijin and the Shin Buddhist Tradition' H-Japan O'Leary on Watt, 'Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism: Yasuda Rijin and the Shin Buddhist Tradition' Page published by Martha Chaiklin on Friday, January 6, 2017 Reposted from H-Buddhism Author: Paul Brooks Watt Reviewer: Joseph S. O'Leary Paul Brooks Watt. Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism: Yasuda Rijin and the Shin Buddhist Tradition. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2016. xii + 181 pp. $52.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8248-5632-8. Reviewed by Joseph S. O'Leary (Sophia University) Published on H-Buddhism (January, 2017) Commissioned by Erez Joskovich Yasuda Rijin (1900-1982) has an important place in Japanese religious philosophy, as a friend of Nishida Kitarō and D. T. Suzuki and the successor of Kiyozawa Manshi, Soga Ryōjin, and Kaneko Daiei at Otani University, where he belongs to a tradition of liberal, philosophizing interpretation of Shin Buddhism (the teaching of the Japanese True Pure Land School, or Jōdo Shinshū). Three of his essays were translated by Paul Watt inCultivating Spirituality: A Modern Shin Buddhist Anthology (2011). The present book offers revised versions of these translations and three further texts. The introductory chapter gives a biography of Yasuda and locates him in the development of Shin Buddhist tradition, and this is filled out in the introductions provided for each of the texts (which could have been set off more clearly from the texts themselves). The title, Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism, is not a cute misappropriation of a Western term, but situates Yasuda’s thought correctly. Influenced by Rudolf Bultmann and the Heidegger ofSein und Zeit, he sought to purge Shin Buddhism of its mythological trappings, even to the point of reducing it to a doctrine of authentic existence, so that the “religious mind” he analyzes is quite hard to distinguish from a secular philosophical mind. Meeting Paul Tillich in Japan in 1960, “Yasuda was concerned that Tillich understand that, contrary to popular treatments of Shin Buddhism, it is not based on belief in an otherworldly Buddha and the experience of his grace” (p. 58). The idea of karma means that “I myself create my destiny, not a deity” (p. 58), that “one has a sense of responsibility for one’s existence” (p. 59). “Amida is one and the same with human beings. He has no form,” but takes form through human action (p. 59). Amida is thusness or emptiness, and invoking his name allows a transformation of consciousness and an awakening to the true nature of reality. Yasuda went back to the origins of the tradition for this interpretation, especially to the philosophies Citation: Martha Chaiklin. O'Leary on Watt, 'Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism: Yasuda Rijin and the Shin Buddhist Tradition'. H- Japan. 01-06-2017. https://networks.h-net.org/node/20904/pages/160241/oleary-watt-demythologizing-pure-land-buddhism-yasuda-rijin-and-shin Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Japan of Nāgārjuna and Vasubandhu, and the work of the Pure Land patriarch Tanluan (476–542). This step back conferred on what is often thought of as a devotional variety of Buddhism an impressive philosophical anchorage in the thinking of emptiness. Yasuda’s embrace of these classical thinkers is more through meditative osmosis than by constructing rigorous arguments, and the formulation of his own religious vision proceeds by cumulative touches. This hardly makes for artful literary composition, though there are moments of eloquence. Having recently been exposed to theologian Bernard Nitsche’s quizzing of Buddhologists and Buddhist-Christian thinkers on the question of transcendence in Buddhism, as well as to Robert Magliola’s insistence on Facing Up to Real Doctrinal Difference (2015), I could not but note the elusiveness of Yasuda’s language of transcendence. This version of Shin Buddhism is radically monistic. No asymmetry is allowed between the Tathāgata and sentient beings. How happy would Shinran be with this? Sometimes Shinran sounds as if he is warning in advance against this kind of revisionism: “The awakening of true faith occurs through the compassionate skillful means of the Great Sage. However, monks and laypeople of this latter age and the masters of these days, drowned in the concepts of ‘one’s self-nature [being identical with Buddha]’ and ‘[all that exists is in] one’s mind,’ despise true enlightenment in the Pure Land.”[1] Even supposing that Amida Buddha can be seen as a personal embodiment of the ultimate Dharma-body, the themes of faith, grace, and salvation that Yasuda played down in his chat with Tillich are factually central in this highly devotional tradition, and might at least have been upheld as indispensable skillful means or conventional truth. “Human beings ‘do not exist within reality itself’ but only within their subjective interpretations of reality which are created through names.... ‘We do not live in a world of direct experience. Discriminating among names and objects is the basis of human existence’” (pp. 35-36). This is supposed to be inspired by the Yogācāra tradition, but does Yogācāra generally not aim at a purified consciousness free of subjective constructions, and marked by immediacy? No doubt Yasuda is referring only to ordinary deluded existence, for he speaks of “beings who, while originally existing in thusness, have in reality lost this thusness” (p. 36). One wonders how operative is the hope of recovering one’s grounding in thusness or emptiness. In any case this theme is perhaps the most powerful in Yasuda’s repertory, allowing Pure Land thought to resonate with modern Western themes of alienation, inauthenticity, bad faith, and false consciousness. The compassionate vow is called “a positive love, like the love of destiny”; the translation introduces ambiguity in calling amor fati “a way of existing for human beings” (p. 92); “of human beings” would be better, for the phrase, associated with Nietzsche, has no altruistic connotations; its association with Amida’s vow seems arbitrary and undeveloped. Another category that receives a demythologized existential interpretation is karma: “It causes the ‘da’ in ‘Da-sein’ to be established. We can think of karma as the category of the nature of reality that causes existence to be real” (p. 92). He links it with Heidegger’s notion of being “thrown out into existence” (p. 96). One would like to see Yasuda attempt to differentiate the Buddhist from the Western concepts more sharply, instead of resting content with their mutual boosting. Another demythologization reduces the Pure Land to “the homeland of existence,” which “more fundamentally, must be existence itself” (p. 102). This monism of existence might recall Heidegger’s wry comment on Bultmann’s article, “Faith,” in the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (1959): “That’s too Heideggerian for me!” To be sure, authentic existence transcends current existence in a religious sense. “Present existences cannot settle down in Citation: Martha Chaiklin. O'Leary on Watt, 'Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism: Yasuda Rijin and the Shin Buddhist Tradition'. H- Japan. 01-06-2017. https://networks.h-net.org/node/20904/pages/160241/oleary-watt-demythologizing-pure-land-buddhism-yasuda-rijin-and-shin Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Japan present existence,” and they need to awaken to “the exceedingly deep and vast nature of existence” (p. 108), which transcends the human and both fulfills and dissolves human desires. The role of reciting Amida’s name (nembutsu) in Shin Buddhism sits oddly with philosophical interpretations, so that when Yasuda says, “because the recitation of the name is true, the entrusting mind is true” (p. 137), one wonders if an entire existential vision is not being jeopardized by being suspended on a devotional exercise. Dennis Hirota would invoke on this point the role of the poetic word in later Heidegger, but it is not the correlation of language and awakening that is problematic, for the philosophical interpreter of Shin Buddhism, but rather the stark particularity of this devotional practice.[2] To say that “it is the shingon of the Dharma that bears witness to the Dharma that gave birth to the Buddha, and through the Buddha’s birth, all human beings as well have been caused to be Buddhas” (p. 114) seeks to universalize the nembutsu by identifying it with the “true word” of Shingon Buddhism. To absolutize a devotional particularity seems incompatible with the essence of Buddhism, so the particularity must somehow be converted into a universal. (A sentence has accidentally dropped out in the translation on p. 103.) Notes [1]. Shinran and Hisao Inagaki,Kyōgyōshinshō: On teaching, Practice, faith, and Enlightenment (Berkeley, Calif: Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, 2003), 83. [2]. Dennis Hirota,Asura's Harp: Engagement with Language as Buddhist Path (Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2006). Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=46909 Citation: Joseph S. O'Leary. Review of Watt, Paul Brooks,Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism: Yasuda Rijin and the Shin Buddhist Tradition. H-Buddhism, H-Net Reviews. January, 2017. URL: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=46909 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Citation: Martha Chaiklin. O'Leary on Watt, 'Demythologizing Pure Land Buddhism: Yasuda Rijin and the Shin Buddhist Tradition'. H- Japan. 01-06-2017. https://networks.h-net.org/node/20904/pages/160241/oleary-watt-demythologizing-pure-land-buddhism-yasuda-rijin-and-shin Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REL 444/544 Medieval Japanese Buddhism, Fall 2019 CRN16061/2 Mark Unno
    REL 444/544 Medieval Japanese Buddhism, Fall 2019 CRN16061/2 Mark Unno Instructor: Mark T. Unno, Office: SCH 334 TEL 6-4973, munno (at) uoregon.edu http://pages.uoregon.edu/munno/ Wed. 2:00 p.m. - 4:50 p.m., Condon 330; Office Hours: Mon 10:00-10:45 a.m.; Tues 1:00-1:45 p.m. No Canvas site. Overview REL 444/544 Medieval Japanese Buddhism focuses on selected strains of Japanese Buddhism during the medieval period, especially the Kamakura (1185-1333), but also traces influences on later developments including the modern period. The course weaves together the examination of religious thought and cultural developments in historical context. We begin with an overview of key Buddhist concepts for those without prior exposure and go onto examine the formative matrix of early Japanese religion. Once some of the outlines of the intellectual and cultural framework of medieval Japanese Buddhism have been brought into relief, we will proceed to examine in depth examples of significant medieval developments. In particular, we will delve into the work of three contemporary figures: Eihei Dōgen (1200-1253), Zen master and founding figure of the Sōtō sect; Myōe of the Shingon and Kegon sects, focusing on his Shingon practices; and Shinran, founding figure of Jōdo Shinshū, the largest Pure Land sect, more simply known as Shin Buddhism. We conclude with the study of some modern examples that nonetheless are grounded in classical and medieval sources, thus revealing the ongoing influence and transformations of medieval Japanese Buddhism. Themes of the course include: Buddhism as state religion; the relation between institutional practices and individual religious cultivation; ritual practices and transgression; gender roles and relations; relations between ordained and lay; religious authority and enlightenment; and two-fold truth and religious practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhism a Level WJEC Support for AO2 Issues.Pdf
    Support for centres with AO2: some suggestions for teaching NB the nature of this information is for developing AO2. What follows are NOT definitive answers – lines of argument are suggested in order to demonstrate the skills of AO2, but the WJEC strongly advises further development and for teachers and candidates to apply their own ideas and evaluation in response to the materials already provided. For the skills of AO2 it is important to remember that what is being assessed are skills of evaluation and not simply knowledge and understanding of content. The six bullets for each Theme are listed beneath the AO1 content. They are NOT questions in themselves but rather indications of the areas of debate that may arise in a typical AO2 question statement. In addition, as AO1 material is studied the whole purpose of AO2 is to approach an understanding of the AO1 material in a critical and evaluative way that is very much a rigorous and academic discipline. One of the most common features of a Principal Examiner’s report is the regular comment that candidates just present lists of views in support of and/or challenging an argument often in response to a question expecting an evaluation. So, for instance, a typical mark scheme may list bullets of points to consider, but to repeat them does not demonstrate AO2. How the points are USED and DEVELOPED by the teacher and candidate to form critical analysis and evaluation is crucial and transforms any suggested material into academic debate that mirrors the AO2 Band descriptors. There is nothing wrong with preparing your considerations and reflections of a topic in response to the ‘Issues for evaluation and analysis’ section of the Specification; however, what is important is making sure that there is some form of personal analysis or commentary throughout the answer that can then be used to form a reasonable conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Heresy: (Mis)Representation, Fabrication, and the Tachikawa-Ryū
    Creating Heresy: (Mis)representation, Fabrication, and the Tachikawa-ryū Takuya Hino Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Takuya Hino All rights reserved ABSTRACT Creating Heresy: (Mis)representation, Fabrication, and the Tachikawa-ryū Takuya Hino In this dissertation I provide a detailed analysis of the role played by the Tachikawa-ryū in the development of Japanese esoteric Buddhist doctrine during the medieval period (900-1200). In doing so, I seek to challenge currently held, inaccurate views of the role played by this tradition in the history of Japanese esoteric Buddhism and Japanese religion more generally. The Tachikawa-ryū, which has yet to receive sustained attention in English-language scholarship, began in the twelfth century and later came to be denounced as heretical by mainstream Buddhist institutions. The project will be divided into four sections: three of these will each focus on a different chronological stage in the development of the Tachikawa-ryū, while the introduction will address the portrayal of this tradition in twentieth-century scholarship. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………………...ii Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………iii Dedication……………………………………………………………………………….………..vi Preface…………………………………………………………………………………………...vii Introduction………………………………………………………………………….…………….1 Chapter 1: Genealogy of a Divination Transmission……………………………………….……40 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • The Shingon Ajikan, Meditation on the Syllable ‘A’: an Analysis of Components and Development
    The Shingon Ajikan, Meditation on the Syllable ‘A’: An analysis of components and development. Ronald S. Green This paper examines what has been described as the most basic and essential element of Kūkai’s (774-835) religio-philosophical system (Yamasaki 1988:190), meditation on the Sanskrit syllable ‘A’. According to Shingon Buddhist tradition, Kūkai introduced the meditation on the syllable ‘A’ (hereafter referred to as the Ajikan) into Japan in the early 9th century, at the time he transmitted the Shingon Dharma to that country from China. Materials clearly showing the origin and development of the Ajikan before Kūkai’s time have either not been discovered or have not been analyzed in relationship to the Ajikan. Indeed, some researchers have argued that the use of ‘A’ as a device for meditation arose as either a Chinese or a Japanese mistranslation of the Mahavairocana-sūtra.1 The present paper is an attempt to contribute to research on the development of the Ajikan by pointing to related references in writings typically associated with earlier traditions. First, by examining Kūkai’s own writings as well as those most important for Shingon, it will be shown that the Ajikan is part of the Tantric system believed to set Shingon apart from other traditions of Buddhism. Materials examined below suggest Kūkai believed that by means of the Ajikan meditation one could become a Buddha within this very lifetime. However, it will be noted that while Kūkai mentions the related Meditation on the Six Elements (rokudai enyū) of the Mahāvairocana-sūtra, which includes the syllable ‘A’, he makes no mention per se of the 1 T.18, 848.
    [Show full text]
  • Shingon Buddhism: Theory and Practice (Minoru Kiyota)
    THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BUDDHIST STUDIES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF A. K. Narain University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA EDITORS Heinz Bechert Leon Hurvitz Universitdt Gottingen, FRG University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Lewis Lancaster A. W. MacDonala University of California, Berkeley, USA Universite de Paris X, Nanterre, France B.J.Stavisky Alex Way man WCNILKR, Moscow, USSR Columbia University, New York, USA ASSOCIATE EDITOR Stephen Beyer University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA Volume 1 Number 2 1979 c/o Department of South Asian Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 CONTENTS I. ARTICLES 1. Is the Buddhist Notion of "Cause Necessitates Effect" (Paticcasamuppada) Scientific? by A.D.P. Kalansuriya 7 2. Chou Yung vs. Chang Jung (on Sunyatd): the Pen-mo Yu-wu Controversy in Fifth-Century China, by Whalen Lai 23 II. SHORT PAPERS 1. Gunaprabha's Vinaya-sutra and his Own Commentary on the Same, by P. V. Bapat 47 2. Keci, "Some," in a Pali Commentary, by I. B. Horner 52 3. Comments on Zen, by M. Kiyota 57 4. The Freudian Unconscious and Bhavanga, by O. H. de A. Wijesekera 63 III. BOOK REVIEWS 1. Tibetan Buddhism in Western Perspective: Collected Ar­ ticles, by H. V. Guenther 67 2. Practice and Theory of Tibetan Buddhism, by Geshe Lhundup Sopa and J. Hopkins 69 3. Shingon Buddhism: Theory and Practice, by M. Kiyota 72 4. Choix de Documents tibetains conserves a la Bibliotheque Nationale, complete par quelques manuscrits de Tlndia Office et du British Museum;presentes par Ariane Macdonald et Yoshiro Imaeda 76 IV. NOTES AND NEWS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Kaji Kito in Nichiren Shu Buddhism Kyomi J
    The Development of Kaji Kito in Nichiren Shu Buddhism Kyomi J. Igarashi Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Prerequisite for Honors in Religion April 2012 Copyright 2012 Kyomi J. Igarashi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Professor Kodera for his guidance and all that he has taught me throughout my four years at Wellesley College. I could not have written this thesis or taken on this topic of my interest without his encouragement and words of advice. I would like to acknowledge the Religion Department for funding me on my trip to Japan in December 2011 to do research for my thesis. I would also like to thank Reverend Ekyo Tsuchida for his great assistance and dedication during my trip to Japan in finding important information and setting up interviews for me, without which I could not have written this thesis. I am forever grateful for your kindness. I express my gratitude to Reverend Ryotoku Miyagawa, Professor Akira Masaki and Professor Daijo Takamori for kindly offering their expertise and advice as well as relevant sources used in this thesis. I would also like to acknowledge Reverend Honyo Okuno for providing me with important sources as well as giving me the opportunity to observe the special treasures exhibited at the Kuonji Temple in Mount. Minobu. Last but not least, I would like to extend my appreciation to my father, mother and younger brother who have always supported me in all my decisions and endeavors. Thank you for the support that you have given me. ii ABSTRACT While the historical and religious roots of kaji kito (“ritual prayer”) lay in Indian and Chinese Esoteric Buddhist practices, the most direct influence of kaji kito in Nichiren Shu Buddhism, a Japanese Buddhist sect founded by the Buddhist monk, Nichiren (1222-1282), comes from Shingon and Tendai Buddhism, two traditions that precede Nichiren’s time.
    [Show full text]
  • Kakuban's Incorporation of Pure Land Practices
    KAKUBAN’S INCORPORATION OF PURE LAND PRACTICES: THE CATALYST FOR THE RESTORATION OF SHINGON DURING THE LATE HEIAN PERIOD A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʽI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RELIGION (ASIAN) APRIL 2013 By Camille Mori Thesis Committee: Michel Mohr, Chairperson Helen Baroni Arthur Thornhill ii Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 Existing Research on Kakuban ....................................................................................................... 2 Heian Buddhism .............................................................................................................................. 4 The Life of Kakuban ....................................................................................................................... 7 Shingon Visualization Practices ................................................................................................... 10 Outline of the Chapters ................................................................................................................. 11 Chapter 2: The Relationship
    [Show full text]
  • 19. Shingon Buddhism.Pdf
    Shingon Buddhism Kükai and Esoteric Buddhism Outstanding among the Buddhist leaders of the Heian Period was Kükai (774 – 835), a man whose genius has well been described, "His memory lives all over the country; his name is a household word in the remotest places, not only as a saint, but as a preacher, a scholar, a poet, a sculptor, a painter, an inventor, an explorer, and—sure passport to fame—a great calligrapher."1 Kükai came from one of the great aristocratic families. At the time of the decision to move the capital from Nara, Kükai's family was closely associated with the group opposed to the move, and was even implicated in the murder of the leader of Mandala of the Diamond (detail), Muromachi Period, 15th- 16th c. the opposing faction. The subsequent disgrace of his family may have been a factor in Kükai’s eventual future existence. Kükai did not deny the validity of decision to become a Buddhist monk rather than to Confucian and Taoist beliefs as such, but pointed out win the high place in the government that his how inadequate they were. For Kükai Buddhism was talents and birth should have guaranteed him. Even not only superior, but actually contained all that was as a small boy he showed exceptional ability in his worthwhile in the other two beliefs. We can thus find studies, and was taken under the protection of his even in this early work signs of the syncretism which maternal uncle, a Confucian scholar. In 791 Kükai marked his mature philosophy. Although Kükai entered the Confucian college in the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Early Esoteric Buddhism in Japan: a Study of Three Japanese Esoteric Apocrypha
    THE FORMATION OF EARLY ESOTERIC BUDDIDSM IN JAPAN: A STUDY OF THE THREE JAPANESE ESOTERIC APOCRYPHA By Jinhua Chen, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University Copyright by Jinhua Chen, May 1997 DOCTOR OF PIDLOSOPHY (1997) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Religious Studies) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Formation of Early Esoteric Buddhism in Japan: A Study of Three Japanese Esoteric Apocrypha AUTHOR: Jinhua Chen, B.A. (Beijing University) M.A. (Beijing University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Koichi Shinohara NUMBER OF PAGES: VII, 294 THIS DISSERTATION IS DEDICATED TO MY PARENTS I ABSTRACT It is said that the Japanese monk: Saich6 (767-822), during his nine-month stay in China, was initiated by his chief Chinese Esoteric mentor Shunxiao (n.d.) into an illustrious esoteric lineage starting from a prestigious Indian Esoteric master Subhakarasimha (637-735). It is also believed that Shunxiao, based on three Esoteric texts translated by Subhakarasimha, transmitted to Saich6 some particular fonns of Esoteric Buddhist teachings, the core of which is preserved in one of the two "dhanna-transmission documents" ifuhi5mon) supposedly written by Shunxiao to certify the esoteric transmission conducted between himself and Saich6. This is the conventional view regarding the roots of Tendai Esoteric Buddhism in Japan. This dissertation subjects this conventional view to a critical examination. It argues that the two fuhCmons ascribed to Shunxiao were not written by Shunxiao himself, but were prepared in Japan for re-interpreting the meaning, and strengthening the legitimacy, of the initiation Saich6 received from China.
    [Show full text]
  • Fudo Myoo's Independent Cult in Japan: an Analysis of Its Evolution and Value
    FUDO MYOO'S INDEPENDENT CULT IN JAPAN: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS EVOLUTION AND VALUE. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Dorothy Jean Sutton, B.A., B.F.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2006 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. John C. Huntington Dr. Julia Andrews Graduate Program in History of Art ABSTRACT This thesis is a collection of information on the Fudō Myōō cult in Japan and aims to create a diverse and complete historical analysis. Academic works by scholars such as Michael Saso, Adiran Snodgrass, Richard Karl Payne, Elizabeth ten Grotenhuis and Ulrich Mammitzsch are examined and their similarities and misconceptions explored. The aim of this thesis, then, is to create a solid base of understanding of the Fudō cult. This study begins with an introduction to the history of Esoteric Buddhism in Japan including a serious study of Kukai. Though his introduction of the Taizo-kai and Kongo-kai mandalas, the Godai Myōō became understood in Japan. Also from these mandalas, Fudō Myōō began to develop as an independent Buddhist cult image. The goma fire ritual was established in Japanese Shingon sects and was widely practiced. Thoughout this evolution of Esoteric Buddhism, images of Fudō Myōō remained important. Referenced images include wooden sculptures as well as paintings. These come from temples such as the To-ji, Todai-ji, Koyasan as well as in foreign collections. One specific piece of interest is the Fudō Myōō in the collection at the Chicago Arts Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Heresy and Heresiology in Shingon Buddhism: Reading the Catalogues of “Perverse Texts” Gaétan Rappo
    Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie Heresy and Heresiology in Shingon Buddhism: Reading the Catalogues of “Perverse Texts” Gaétan Rappo Citer ce document / Cite this document : Rappo Gaétan. Heresy and Heresiology in Shingon Buddhism: Reading the Catalogues of “Perverse Texts”. In: Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie, vol. 26, 2017. Droit et Bouddhisme. Principe et pratique dans le Tibet prémoderne / Law and Buddhism. Principle and Practice in Pre-modern Tibet pp. 137-152; doi : https://doi.org/10.3406/asie.2017.1494 https://www.persee.fr/doc/asie_0766-1177_2017_num_26_1_1494 Fichier pdf généré le 18/03/2019 Heresy and Heresiology in sHingon BuddHism 137 HERESY AND HERESIOLOGY IN SHINGON BUDDHISM: READING THE CATALOGUES OF “PERVERSE TEXTS” Gaétan Rappo* Catalogues or indexes occupy an important place in the Buddhist canon. One volume of the Taishō (55) and the first two of the well-known collection of Japanese Bud- dhist texts Dai Nihon bukkyō zensho 大日本仏教全書 (DNBZ) are in fact dedicated exclusively to them. Buddhist catalogues contain texts listing either works from one specific school, or major titles from every one of them. In Japan, the Edo period saw the production of quite a large number of such catalogues. A good example of the latter can be found in the revised edition of Shoshū shōshoroku 諸宗章疏録 (Catalog of the Texts and Commentaries of Each School), which was compiled by the Shingon monk Kenjun 謙順 (1740–1820) in 1789.1 It essentially lists the most important works—and especially earlier catalogues—of each school, starting with Kegon. The structure is always roughly the same: first the works are divided by schools or by large subjects, like inmyō 因明 (logic).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics in Exile: a Comparative Study of Shinran and Maimonides
    Ethics in Exile: A Comparative Study of Shinran and Maimonides Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ilana Maymind Graduate Program in Comparative Studies The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Tamar Rudavsky, Advisor Thomas Kasulis, Advisor Lindsay Jones Copyright by Ilana Maymind 2011 Abstract While interest in Maimonides’ (1136 – 1204) thought and influence remains high among scholars, he has never been placed in a hypothetical conversation with any East Asian thinker. Similarly, Shinran (1173 – 1262) has been compared with some Christian thinkers (i.e. Calvin and lately Heidegger), yet his thought has never been compared with the thought of any Jewish thinker. This dissertation focuses on these two medieval thinkers: Shinran, founder of Japanese True Pure Land Buddhism (Jōdo Shinsh ū) and Maimonides, Jewish philosopher, rabbi, community leader and physician. This comparison takes into account Shinran’s and Maimonides’ respective exilic conditions and demonstrates that this experience was instrumental in the development of some of their views. When Maimonides’ views, informed by the Aristotelian privileging of the rational, are juxtaposed with those of Shinran, informed by Eastern tradition embedded in Indian, Chinese and Japanese medieval thought, we are forced to re-examine some of the premises that are often assumed to be universal. This juxtaposition reinforces the universality of the human desire to attain happiness, although understood differently by these two thinkers. Second, this analysis points to the fact that their respective views concerning happiness are embedded in the mechanisms that shaped human character; this is exemplified not only in their thought but also their behavior.
    [Show full text]