DOCSLIB.ORG

STATE of the WASHINGTON COAST Ecology, Management, and Research Priorities Editors Elizabeth Skewgar1 and Scott F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
STATE of the WASHINGTON COAST Ecology, Management, and Research Priorities Editors Elizabeth Skewgar1 and Scott F STATE OF THE WASHINGTON COAST Ecology, Management, and Research Priorities Editors Elizabeth Skewgar1 and Scott F. Pearson1 Contributing authors Elizabeth Skewgar1, Megan Dethier2, Scott F. Pearson1, Gretchen Blatz1, Kenneth I. Warheit1, and Michele Culver1 Reviewers (in alphabetical order) Liam Antrim3, Rich Carlson4, Jennifer Hennessey5, Thomas F. Mumford6, Charles A. Simenstad7, Joanna Smith8, and Barry Troutman1 1Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2University of Washington Friday Harbor Labs 3Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary 4U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 5Washington Department of Ecology 6Washington Department of Natural Resources 7University of Washington 8The Nature Conservancy Cover photo credits Top row: Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) by Pete Hodum; Kalaloch Creek by Barry Troutman Middle row: double‐crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) colony off Tatoosh Island, tufted puffin (Fratercula cirrhata) by Peter Hodum; sea anemones (order Actiniaria) by Barry Troutman Bottom row: Black rockfish (Sebastes melanops) with red sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus), vermillion rockfish (Sebastes miniatus) by Wayne Palsson, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; kelp (order Laminariales) by Peter Hodum Suggested citation Skewgar, E. and S.F. Pearson (Eds.). 2011. State of the Washington Coast: Ecology, Management, and Research Priorities. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. Table of Contents List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................... iv Preface ................................................................................................................................................ v Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ vi I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Coastal habitats .................................................................................................................................... 2 Coastal habitat classification and mapping .......................................................................................... 2 II. Ecology of the Washington coast ................................................................................................. 7 Physical processes ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Currents ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Tides ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Climate ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Physical habitats and biotic communities ..................................................................................................... 9 Intertidal and subtidal benthos ............................................................................................................ 9 Deep benthos ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Nearshore pelagic ............................................................................................................................... 17 Anthropogenic stressors ............................................................................................................................. 18 Oil pollution ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Climate change ................................................................................................................................... 23 Harvest and human disturbance ........................................................................................................ 24 Non‐native, invasive species .............................................................................................................. 27 Habitat loss ......................................................................................................................................... 29 Harmful algal blooms ......................................................................................................................... 29 III. Management of the Washington coast ...................................................................................... 31 Coastal ownership ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Governmental coordination ....................................................................................................................... 31 State Ocean Caucus ............................................................................................................................ 31 Olympic Coast Intergovernmental Policy Council .............................................................................. 32 Marine Resource Committees ............................................................................................................ 32 Marine protected areas .............................................................................................................................. 32 Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary ........................................................................................ 33 Olympic National Park ........................................................................................................................ 33 National Wildlife Refuges ................................................................................................................... 33 Species and habitat monitoring and management..................................................................................... 34 Birds .................................................................................................................................................... 34 Invertebrates and fish ........................................................................................................................ 35 Marine mammals ............................................................................................................................... 37 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Priority Habitats and Species Program ................... 37 Environmental monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 38 National Aquatic Resource Surveys .................................................................................................... 38 Northwest Association of Networked Ocean Observing Systems ..................................................... 38 Environmental Assessment Program ................................................................................................. 39 Ocean Observatories Initiative ........................................................................................................... 39 State of the Washington Coast i Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team ................................................................................. 39 Intertidal Monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 39 Fish and Shellfish Safety Monitoring .................................................................................................. 40 Southwest Washington Coastal Erosion Study .................................................................................. 40 Oil spill response ......................................................................................................................................... 40 Northwest Area Contingency Plan ..................................................................................................... 40 Ecological restoration ................................................................................................................................. 41 IV. Research priorities for the Washington coast ............................................................................. 42 Research needs ........................................................................................................................................... 42 Ecosystem‐based Management ......................................................................................................... 43 Marine Spatial Planning ..................................................................................................................... 44 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 57 References ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INTERTIDAL ZONATION Introduction to Oceanography Spring 2017 The
    INTERTIDAL ZONATION Introduction to Oceanography Spring 2017 The Intertidal Zone is the narrow belt along the shoreline lying between the lowest and highest tide marks. The intertidal or littoral zone is subdivided broadly into four vertical zones based on the amount of time the zone is submerged. From highest to lowest, they are Supratidal or Spray Zone Upper Intertidal submergence time Middle Intertidal Littoral Zone influenced by tides Lower Intertidal Subtidal Sublittoral Zone permanently submerged The intertidal zone may also be subdivided on the basis of the vertical distribution of the species that dominate a particular zone. However, zone divisions should, in most cases, be regarded as approximate! No single system of subdivision gives perfectly consistent results everywhere. Please refer to the intertidal zonation scheme given in the attached table (last page). Zonal Distribution of organisms is controlled by PHYSICAL factors (which set the UPPER limit of each zone): 1) tidal range 2) wave exposure or the degree of sheltering from surf 3) type of substrate, e.g., sand, cobble, rock 4) relative time exposed to air (controls overheating, desiccation, and salinity changes). BIOLOGICAL factors (which set the LOWER limit of each zone): 1) predation 2) competition for space 3) adaptation to biological or physical factors of the environment Species dominance patterns change abruptly in response to physical and/or biological factors. For example, tide pools provide permanently submerged areas in higher tidal zones; overhangs provide shaded areas of lower temperature; protected crevices provide permanently moist areas. Such subhabitats within a zone can contain quite different organisms from those typical for the zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the Intertidal Zone
    Life in the Rocky Intertidal Zone Tidepools provide a home for many animals. Tidepools are created by the changing water level, or tides. The high energy waves make this a harsh habitat, but the animals living here have adapted over time. When the earth, sun and moon align during the full and new moon we have extreme high and low tides. Generally, there are two high tides and two low tides a day. An example of low and high tide is seen on the right. There are three zones within the tidepools: the high zone, the middle zone, and the low zone. Animals are distributed based on their adaptations to different living (competition and predation) and non living (wave action and water loss) factors. The tidepools at Cabrillo are protected and have been monitored by the National Park Service since 1990. You may notice bolts in Low Tide the rocky intertidal, these are used to assist scientists in gathering data to monitor changes. Tidepool Etiquette: Human impact can hurt the animals. As you explore the tidepools, you may touch the animals living here, but only as gently as you would touch your own eyeball. Some animals may die if moved even a few inches from where they are found. Federal law prohibits collection and removal of any shells, rocks and marine specimens. Also, be aware of the changing tides, slippery rocks and unstable cliffs. Have fun exploring! High Tide High Zone The high zone is covered by the highest tides. Often this area is only sprayed by the (Supralittoral or crashing waves.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Patterns of Macrozoobenthos Assemblages in a Sentinel Coastal Lagoon: Biodiversity and Environmental Drivers
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Spatial Patterns of Macrozoobenthos Assemblages in a Sentinel Coastal Lagoon: Biodiversity and Environmental Drivers Soilam Boutoumit 1,2,* , Oussama Bououarour 1 , Reda El Kamcha 1 , Pierre Pouzet 2 , Bendahhou Zourarah 3, Abdelaziz Benhoussa 1, Mohamed Maanan 2 and Hocein Bazairi 1,4 1 BioBio Research Center, BioEcoGen Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University in Rabat, 4 Avenue Ibn Battouta, Rabat 10106, Morocco; [email protected] (O.B.); [email protected] (R.E.K.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (H.B.) 2 LETG UMR CNRS 6554, University of Nantes, CEDEX 3, 44312 Nantes, France; [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (M.M.) 3 Marine Geosciences and Soil Sciences Laboratory, Associated Unit URAC 45, Faculty of Sciences, Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida 24000, Morocco; [email protected] 4 Institute of Life and Earth Sciences, Europa Point Campus, University of Gibraltar, Gibraltar GX11 1AA, Gibraltar * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This study presents an assessment of the diversity and spatial distribution of benthic macrofauna communities along the Moulay Bousselham lagoon and discusses the environmental factors contributing to observed patterns. In the autumn of 2018, 68 stations were sampled with three replicates per station in subtidal and intertidal areas. Environmental conditions showed that the range of water temperature was from 25.0 ◦C to 12.3 ◦C, the salinity varied between 38.7 and 3.7, Citation: Boutoumit, S.; Bououarour, while the average of pH values fluctuated between 7.3 and 8.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertidal Sand and Mudflats & Subtidal Mobile
    INTERTIDAL SAND AND MUDFLATS & SUBTIDAL MOBILE SANDBANKS An overview of dynamic and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs M. Elliott. S.Nedwell, N.V.Jones, S.J.Read, N.D.Cutts & K.L.Hemingway Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies University of Hull August 1998 Prepared by Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS) for the UK Marine SACs Project, Task Manager, A.M.W. Wilson, SAMS Vol II Intertidal sand and mudflats & subtidal mobile sandbanks 1 Citation. M.Elliott, S.Nedwell, N.V.Jones, S.J.Read, N.D.Cutts, K.L.Hemingway. 1998. Intertidal Sand and Mudflats & Subtidal Mobile Sandbanks (volume II). An overview of dynamic and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs. Scottish Association for Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project). 151 Pages. Vol II Intertidal sand and mudflats & subtidal mobile sandbanks 2 CONTENTS PREFACE 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 I. INTRODUCTION 17 A. STUDY AIMS 17 B. NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF THE BIOTOPE COMPLEXES 17 C. STATUS WITHIN OTHER BIOTOPE CLASSIFICATIONS 25 D. KEY POINTS FROM CHAPTER I. 27 II. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS AND PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES 29 A. SPATIAL EXTENT 29 B. HYDROPHYSICAL REGIME 29 C. VERTICAL ELEVATION 33 D. SUBSTRATUM 36 E. KEY POINTS FROM CHAPTER II 43 III. BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING 45 A. CHARACTERISTIC AND ASSOCIATED SPECIES 45 B. ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING AND PREDATOR-PREY RELATIONSHIPS 53 C. BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERACTIONS 58 D. KEY POINTS FROM CHAPTER III 65 IV. SENSITIVITY TO NATURAL EVENTS 67 A. POTENTIAL AGENTS OF CHANGE 67 B. KEY POINTS FROM CHAPTER IV 74 V. SENSITIVITY TO ANTHROPOGENIC ACTIVITIES 75 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Energy and Intertidal Productivity (Leaf Area Index/Myfilus Californianus/Postelsia/Rocky Shore/Zonation) EGBERT G
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 84, pp. 1314-1318, March 1987 Ecology Wave energy and intertidal productivity (leaf area index/Myfilus californianus/Postelsia/rocky shore/zonation) EGBERT G. LEIGH, JR.*, ROBERT T. PAINEt, JAMES F. QUINNt, AND THOMAS H. SUCHANEKt§ *Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 2072, Balboa, Panama; tDepartment of Zoology NJ-15, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; tDivision of Environmental Studies, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616; and §Bodega Marine Laboratory, P. 0. Box 247, Bodega Bay, CA 94923 Contributed by Robert T. Paine, October 20, 1986 ABSTRACT In the northeastern Pacific, intertidal zones we estimate standing crop and productivity in different zones of the most wave-beaten shores receive more energy from of exposed and sheltered rocky shores of Tatoosh Island (480 breaking waves than from the sun. Despite severe mortality 19' N, 1240 40' W), showing that intertidal productivity is from winter storms, communities at some wave-beaten sites much higher in wave-beaten settings. Finally, we consider produce an extraordinary quantity of dry matter per unit area the various roles waves may play in enhancing the produc- of shore per year. At wave-beaten sites of Tatoosh Island, WA, tivity of intertidal organisms. sea palms, Postelsia palmaeformis, can produce >10 kg of dry matter, or 1.5 x 108 J. per m2 in a good year. Extraordinarily METHODS productive organisms such as Postelsia are restricted to wave- The Power Supplied by Breaking Waves. Calculating the beaten sites. Intertidal organisms cannot transform wave power carried by waves in the open ocean. Waves generated energy into chemical energy, as photosynthetic plants trans- anywhere in the ocean-dissipate most of their energy against form solar energy, nor can intertidal organisms "harness" some shore as surf (13, 14).
    [Show full text]
  • Intertidal Zonation of Two Gastropods, Nerita Plicata and Morula Granulata, in Moorea, French Polynesia
    INTERTIDAL ZONATION OF TWO GASTROPODS, NERITA PLICATA AND MORULA GRANULATA, IN MOOREA, FRENCH POLYNESIA VANESSA R. WORMSER Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA Abstract. Intertidal zonation of organisms is a key factor in ecological community structure and the existence of fundamental and realized niches. The zonation of two species of gastropods, Nerita plicata and Morula granulata were investigated using field observations and lab experimentation. The Nerita plicata were found on the upper limits of the intertidal zone while the Morula granulata were found on the lower limits. The distribution of each species was observed and the possible causes of this zonation were examined. Three main factors, desiccation, flow resistance and shell size were tested for their zonation. In the field, shell measurements of each species were made to see if a vertical shell size gradient existed; the results showed an upshore shell size gradient for each species. In the lab, experiments were run to see if the zonation preference found in the field existed in the lab as well. This experiment confirmed that a zonation between these species does in fact exist. Additional experiments were run to test desiccation and flow resistance between each species. A difference in desiccation rates and flow resistance were found with the Nerita plicata being more resistant to both flow and desiccation. The findings of this study provide an understanding on why zonation between these two species could exist as well as why zonation is important within an intertidal community and ecosystems as a whole. Key words: community structure; gastropod; zonation; intertidal; morphometrics; Morula granulata; Nerita plicata; Mo’orea, French Polynesia; INTRODUCTION The main goal of an ecological survey is to because of the high species diversity, the explore and understand the key dynamic convenience of the habitat as well as the easy relationships among organisms living in a collection of the sessile organisms that inhabit community (Elton 1966).
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific County, Washington and Incorporated Areas
    PACIFIC COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ILWACO, TOWN OF 530127 LONG BEACH, TOWN OF 530128 PACIFIC COUNTY, 530126 UNINCORPORATED AREAS RAYMOND, CITY OF 530129 SHOALWATER BAY INDIAN TRIBE 530341 SOUTH BEND, CITY OF 530130 Pacific County PRELIMINARY: AUGUST 30, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 53049CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone(s) New Zone Al through A30 AE B X C X Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: To Be Determined TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ...................................................................... 1 1.3 Coordination .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Intertidal, Mudflats and Beaches, and Eelgrass Beds
    Appendix 5.4, Page 1 Appendix 5.4 Marine and Coastline Habitats Featured Species-associated Intertidal Habitats: Rocky Intertidal, Mudflats and Beaches, and Eelgrass Beds A swath of intertidal habitat occurs wherever the ocean meets the shore. At 44,000 miles, Alaska’s shoreline is more than double the shoreline for the entire Lower 48 states (ACMP 2005). This extensive shoreline creates an impressive abundance and diversity of habitats. Five physical factors predominantly control the distribution and abundance of biota in the intertidal zone: wave energy, bottom type (substrate), tidal exposure, temperature, and most important, salinity (Dethier and Schoch 2000; Ricketts and Calvin 1968). The distribution of many commercially important fishes and crustaceans with particular salinity regimes has led to the description of “salinity zones,” which can be used as a basis for mapping these resources (Bulger et al. 1993; Christensen et al. 1997). A new methodology called SCALE (Shoreline Classification and Landscape Extrapolation) has the ability to separate the roles of sediment type, salinity, wave action, and other factors controlling estuarine community distribution and abundance. This section of Alaska’s CWCS focuses on 3 main types of intertidal habitat: rocky intertidal, mudflats and beaches, and eelgrass beds. Tidal marshes, which are also intertidal habitats, are discussed in the Wetlands section, Appendix 5.3, of the CWCS. Rocky intertidal habitats can be categorized into 3 main types: (1) exposed, rocky shores composed of steeply dipping, vertical bedrock that experience high-to- moderate wave energy; (2) exposed, wave-cut platforms consisting of wave-cut or low-lying bedrock that experience high-to-moderate wave energy; and (3) sheltered, rocky shores composed of vertical rock walls, bedrock outcrops, wide rock platforms, and boulder-strewn ledges and usually found along sheltered bays or along the inside of bays and coves.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertidal Zone
    INTERTIDAL ZONE The Intertidal Zone The Beach Starts in the Mountains • Glaciation, terranes, uplift, volcanism and erosion have brought rocks, sediment and sand down from the mountains through 10,000 streams to Puget Sound and created the beaches we see there. What Lives Where and Why? • Rock, sand, wave action, tidepools, exposure, temperature, light, dessication, food supply, and predation drive what can live in a particular part of the intertidal zone. • Example: Purple sea stars live under overhanging rocks and and climb up at high tide to eat barnacles and mussels on the rock. During summer storms or winter, they stay in low intertidal areas and do not feed. The level of barnacles and mussels on the rock reflects the predation of sea stars. Reproduction of sea stars is determined by the amount of light and food supply. Purple Sea Star Echinoderm Barnacles Arthropod Intertidal Zone above water at low tide & under water at high tide • May include many different types of habitats: rocks, cliffs, sand, wetlands, clay, shale, tidepools, stream outlets • Organisms in the intertidal zones are adapted to an environment of harsh extremes; sometimes submerged, exposed to sun, dessication, wave action, variable salinity, temperature extremes INTERTIDAL ZONE CARKEEK BEACH 11.0 ft -0.4 ft Intertidal Zonation on rocks at low tide Species ranges are compressed into very narrow bands Glacial erratic at Carkeek Park at low tide - encrusted with mussels, barnacles, sea stars, chitons, seaweed Intertidal Zone Organisms Life Zones of the Beach • Splash
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Productivity of Intertidal Mudflats in the Wadden Sea: a Remote Sensing Method
    Primary Productivity of Intertidal mudflats in the Wadden Sea: A Remote Sensing Method TIMOTHY DUBE February, 2012 SUPERVISORS: Dr. Ir. Mhd. (Suhyb). Salama Dr. Ir. C.M.M. (Chris). Mannaerts INPLACE externals: Dr. Eelke Folmer, NIOZ Prof. Dr.Jacco Kromkamp Primary Productivity of Intertidal mudflats in the Wadden Sea: A Remote Sensing Method TIMOTHY DUBE Enschede, The Netherlands, February 2012 Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of Twente in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geo-information Science and Earth Observation. Specialization: Water Resources and Environmental Management SUPERVISORS: Dr. Ir. Mhd. (Suhyb). Salama Dr. Ir. C.M.M. (Chris). Mannaerts INPLACE externals: Dr. Eelke Folmer, NIOZ Prof. Dr.Jacco Kromkamp THESIS ASSESSMENT BOARD: Prof. Dr. Ir. W. (Wouter), Verhoef (Chair) Dr. Hans van der Woerd, (External examiner, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY OF INTERTIDAL MUDFLATS IN THE WADDEN SEA: A REMOTE SENSING METHOD DISCLAIMER This document describes work undertaken as part of a programme of study at the Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of Twente. All views and opinions expressed therein remain the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of the Faculty. PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY OF INTERTIDAL MUDFLATS IN THE WADDEN SEA: A REMOTE SENSING METHOD Abstract The relative contribution of microphytobenthic (MPB) primary productivity to the total primary productivity of intertidal ecosystems is largely unknown. The possibility to estimate MPB primary productivity would be a significant contribution to a better understanding of the role of intertidal mudflats for ecosystem functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Immigrant Oyster (Ostrea Gigas)
    THE IMMIGRANT OYSTER (OSTREA GIGAS) NOW KNOWN AS THE PACIFIC OYSTER by E. N. STEELE PIONEER OLYMPIA OYSTERMAN IN COOPERATION WITH PACIFIC COAST OYSTER GROWERS ASSOCIATION, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I.........................................................................................................................Page 1 INTRODUCTION AN OYSTER GOES ABROAD SEED SETTING IN MAYAGI PREFECTURE IN YEAR 1918 SEEDS WERE VERY SMALL IN YEAR 1919 STORY OF JOE MAYAGI AND EMY TSUKIMATO SAMISH BAY SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL PLANTINGS FIRST PLANTING OF SEED WAS A SUCCESS EXPERIMENTAL WORK IN JAPAN REPORT BY DR. GALTSOFF (Doc. 1066) U. S. BIOLOGIST Dr. HORI, JAPANESE BIOLOGIST OFFICIAL) REPORT ON SEED IN 1919 LESSONS LEARNED FROM JAPANESE EXPERIENCE Time of year to ship--Small seed most successful- When and where planted required further experience -The oyster had to answer that question. A TRIP TO SAMISH BAY WASHINGTON STATE PASSED ANTI-ALIEN ACT IN 1921 ROCKPOINT OYSTER Co. COMPLETED PURCHASE MAY 18, 1923 CHAPTER II........................................................................................................................Page8 An Oyster becomes Naturalized-Haines Oyster Co. of Seattle First Customer -Development of Seattle Markets -First year marketing very limited -First year shipper, Emy Tsukimato from Japan -First Seed Shipment, 492 Cases. Samples still retained. Development of best type of cultch. Experimental shipping in hold of ship or on deck -expanding the markets. Advent of planting in Willapa Harbor and Grays Harbor -
    [Show full text]
  • Net Shore-Drift and Artificial Structures Within Grays Harbor, Willapa Bay
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Spring 1995 Net Shore-Drift nda Artificial Structures within Grays Harbor, Willapa Bay, and Mouth of the Columbia River, Washington B. Patrice (Berenthine Patrice) Thomas Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Thomas, B. Patrice (Berenthine Patrice), "Net Shore-Drift nda Artificial Structures within Grays Harbor, Willapa Bay, and Mouth of the Columbia River, Washington" (1995). WWU Graduate School Collection. 812. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/812 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WWU LIBRARIES NET SHORE-DRIFT AND ARTIFICIAL STRUCTURES WITHIN GRAYS HARBOR, WILLAPA BAY, AND MOUTH OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER, WASHINGTON by B. Patrice Thomas Accepted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Dean of Graduate School Advisory Committee Chair, Dr. Christopher A. Suczek Director, Dr. Maurice L. Schwartz Member, Dr. Thomas A. Terich MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only forscholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this thesis for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]