I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Waitākere Ranges Local Board will be held on:
Date: Thursday, 14 May 2015 Time: 6.30pm Meeting Room: Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Venue: 39 Glenmall Place Glen Eden
Waitākere Ranges Local Board
OPEN AGENDA
MEMBERSHIP
Chairperson Sandra Coney, QSO Deputy Chairperson Denise Yates, JP Members Neil Henderson Greg Presland Steve Tollestrup Saffron Toms
(Quorum 3 members)
Glenn Boyd (Relationship Manager) Local Board Services (West)
Tua Viliamu (Democracy Advisor)
11 May 2015
Contact Telephone: (09) 813 9478 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz
Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contact the relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson.
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 14 May 2015
ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Welcome 5 2 Apologies 5 3 Declaration of Interest 5 4 Confirmation of Minutes 6 5 Leave of Absence 6 6 Acknowledgements 6 7 Update from Ward Councillors 6 8 Deputations 6 8.1 Sport Waitakere 7 9 Public Forum 7 10 Extraordinary Business 7 11 Notices of Motion 8 12 Renewal and variation of community lease to Woodlands Park Community Kindergarten Incorporated, 22A Minnehaha Avenue, Titirangi 9 13 Piha Seaview Walkway - Unauthorised vehicle access to private properties 15 14 Northern New Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Protection Framework for Te Henga/Bethells Beach 27 15 Auckland Transport - Mountain Road 45 16 Waitakere Ranges Local Board Discretionary Community Funding - Round Two 2014/2015 49 17 Public awareness project and septic tank upgrade subsidy scheme to improve water quality in the west coast lagoons 95 18 2015/2016 Budget allocation: Kauri dieback co-ordinator project 103 19 Review of alcohol bans 2015 107 20 Dog Access Rules Review - Statement of Proposal 127 21 Manukau Harbour Forum Work Programme for 2015/2016 203 22 Waitakere Ranges Local Board Community Fees and Charges - July to December 2014 227 23 Developing the Empowered Communities Approach - Next Steps 245 24 2014/15 Programme allocation finalisation This report will be tabled at the meeting.
25 Chairperson's Report - May 2015 257 26 Portfolio update: Member Sandra Coney 271 27 Portfolio update: Member Denise Yates 283 28 Portfolio update: Member Greg Presland 287
Page 3
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 14 May 2015
29 Update on member's attendance to the National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee workshop (NAEAC) and 2015 Dune Restoration Trust Conference 291 30 Confirmation of workshop records - 27 November 2014 to March 2015 311 31 Consideration of Extraordinary Items
Page 4
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 14 May 2015
1 Welcome
2 Apologies
At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received.
3 Declaration of Interest Members were reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have. Specifically members are asked to identify any new interests they have not previously disclosed, an interest that might be considered as a conflict of interest with a matter on the agenda. At its meeting on 28 November 2013, the Waitakere Ranges Local Board resolved (resolution number WTK/2010/5) to record any possible conflicts of interest in a register. Register Board Member Organisation / Position Sandra Coney Waitemata District Health Board – Elected Member Women’s Health Action Trust – Patron Neil Henderson Portage Trust – Elected Member West Auckland Trust Services (WATS) Board – Trustee/Director Weedfree Trust – Employee Greg Presland Portage Trust – Elected Member Lopdell House Development Trust – Trustee Titirangi Residents & Ratepayers Group – Committee Member Whau Coastal Walkway Environmental Trust – Trustee Combined Youth Services Trust - Trustee Steve Tollestrup Waitakere Licensing Trust – Elected Member Community Waitakere – Trustee West Auckland Trust Services (WATS) Board – Trustee/Director Saffron Toms NIL Denise Yates Ecomatters Environment Trust – Trustee Keep Waitakere Beautiful Trust – Trustee Huia-Cornwallis Ratepayers & Residents Association – Co-chairperson Charlotte Museum Trust – Trustee Friends of Arataki Incorporated – Committee member
Page 5
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 14 May 2015
Member appointments Board members are appointed to the following bodies. In these appointments the board members represent Auckland Council.
Board Member Organisation / Position Sandra Coney Friends of Arataki Incorporated – Trustee Neil Henderson Friends of Arataki Incorporated – Trustee Living Cell Technologies Animal Ethics Committee – Member Saffron Toms Ark in the Park – Governance Group Member
There was no changes to the register.
4 Confirmation of Minutes
That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: Confirms the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 23 April 2015, as a true and correct record.
5 Leave of Absence
At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received.
6 Acknowledgements
At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received.
7 Update from Ward Councillors
An opportunity is provided for the Waitakere Ward Councillors to update the board on regional issues they have been involved with since the last meeting.
8 Deputations
Standing Order 3.20 provides for deputations. Those applying for deputations are required to give seven working days notice of subject matter and applications are approved by the Chairperson of the Waitākere Ranges Local Board. This means that details relating to deputations can be included in the published agenda. Total speaking time per deputation is ten minutes or as resolved by the meeting.
Page 6
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 14 May 2015
8.1 Sport Waitakere
Purpose Sport Waitakere has asked for the opportunity to present to the board the following projects status in the Waitakere Ranges Local Board area and to answer any questions: Swim Safe Programme Sport Waitakere’s Broker work in the Waitakere Ranges Parrs Park feasibility study and ground closures/future works programme
Recommendation/s That the Waitākere Ranges Local Board: a) Receives the deputation from Sports Waitakere and thank them for the presentation.
9 Public Forum
A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from www members.
At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received.
10 Extraordinary Business
Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-
(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and
(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public,-
(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and
(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”
Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states:
“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting,-
(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-
(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and
(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but
Page 7
Waitākere Ranges Local Board 14 May 2015
(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.”
11 Notices of Motion
At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.
Page 8
ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpose FileNo.: Titirangi CommunityKindergarten Incorporated, 22A MinnehahaAvenue, Renewaland variation o May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 22A MinnehahaIncorporated, Titirangi Avenue, variation ofRenewal and communityto lease Park Community Kindergarten Woodlands b) a) That the Recommendation/s 5. 4. 3. 2.
omnt gop eecsn a ih o rnwl r akd o conside has to Kindergarten The asked Plan. Outcomes conditions are and terms current its on communitylease Communitytheir continue to wish they that advised renewal a include of to varied right lease community a exercising groups Community Kindergartenaligns with the reserve classifications. the of activity The 1977. Act Reserves the to subject are land of parcels Both a reserve. hall) as Council Auckland by simple fee in held is 147 Lot andreserve buildings) (community purpose (Cancellocal classified a as Council Auckland by simple NA604/96 in fee in held contained is 32 AerialAllotment Part (Cancelled). NA684/185 in contained Waikomiti 30907 Plan Deposited of A: Parish (Attachment 32 hours Allotment Part namely kindergarten land of parcels during separate two of playgroundpart occupies Kindergarten The the photograph). of use and Titirangi 22 ofPark,part on Hall (theWoodlands locatedHall)WoodlandsPark CouncilknownbuildingownedKindergartencontinueas Aucklandleasing the wishes to The 5 one wishes exerciseto contains its rightof renewal periodfor the 1 September 2015 until August31 2020. lease The 2010. September 1 commencing years 5 of term a for CouncilCity Waitakere legacy the with into entered lease Wood partof WoodlandsPark, 22AMinnehaha Avenue, Titirangi. community of lease to CommunityWoodlands Park Kindergarten Incorporated, located on This report seeks Ranges Waitākere Local Board approval to granta renewaland variation i) Approvesvariation a to the renewal lease of to include the ii) i) NA684/185 (Cancelled) theon followingterms and conditions: in (Cancelled) contained Waikomiti of Parish NA604/96 32 Allotment Part of part being Titirangi Avenue, Minnehaha 22A Park, Woodlands of part for Incorporated Kindergarten Community A to lease communitySeptember2015. of variation and renewal 1commencing years 5 of term a a for Incorporated CommunityKindergarten Park Woodlands of granting the recommends report This withvariation a only to include Auckland Council’sSmoke
poe te rnig f rnwl f omnt lae o odad Park Woodlands to lease community of renewal a of granting the pproves
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
CP2015/06490
o bd b drn te em Wolns ak omnt Kindergarten Community Park Woodlands Term. the w Incorporated during by abide to obliged is IncorporatedKindergartenCommunity Park PolicyWoodlands which Smoke a adopted has Council Auckland Rent: $2500 plus GST perannum Term: 5 years commencing 1 September 2015 lands Park Community Kindergarten Incorporated (the Kindergarten) has a communitya Kindergarten)has Incorporated(the Community Kindergarten Park lands
ill use its best endeavours to ensure its members, employees, members, its ensure to endeavours best its use ill
and Lot 147 on Deposited Plan 30907 contained in in contained 30907 Plan Deposited on 147 Lot and f communityf lease to Woodlands Park
- Free Policy to apply on Council land, land, Council on apply to Policy Free - er ih o rnwl Te Kindergarte The renewal. of right year
- classified local purpose (site for a for (site purpose local classified FreePol followingclause:
icy.
e) n Lt 4 on 147 Lot and led) A MinnehahaA Avenue,
hvn their having r Page Page n 9
Item 12 Item 12 22A MinnehahaIncorporated, Titirangi Avenue, variation ofRenewal and communityto lease Park Community Kindergarten Woodlands 12. 11. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. Comment May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Kindergarten worked alongside Auckland Council to design and have installed a new new a installed have maintains. and Council Auckland and design funded Kindergarten the which $57,000 to over of cost a Councilat playground Auckland alongside worked Kindergarten Outside only. hours Kindergarten during playground the of use and Hall the over lease a has Kindergarten The needs the of children from two throughto five yearsof age. include that adults 25 helpe and children 60 of parent two and staff three withsession per membershipchildren 30 are grandparents.There and parents current a has Kindergarten The contributionto society." belonging of sense their in secure spirit, and body mind, in healthycommunicators, and learners confident and competent as up grow "to which isbasedon the followingaspirations for children: struct both of programme Kindergarten The issupported and licensed by the Ministry Education. of offersIt a Kindergartenaims are: a as registered 1996, was Kindergarten The since Council City Waitakere legacy from Hall althoughthey have beenin occupationof the building foralmost 50 years. the leased has Kindergarten The Kindergartenaligns with the reserve classifications. a for (site purpose the local activity of The 1977. ActReserves classified the subjectto are land of parcelsBoth a reserve. hall) as Council Auckland by simple fee in held on is 147 Lot 147 Lot and (Cancelled) Cou Auckland by simple NA604/96 in fee in held contained is 32 Allotment Part (Cancelled). NA684/185 in contained Waikomiti 30907 Plan Deposited of Parish 32 Allotment Kindergar The Titirangi. Minnehaha22AofPark, partAvenue, on Hall (theWoodlands locatedHall)WoodlandsPark CouncilknownbuildingownedKindergartencontinueas Aucklandleasing the wishes to The 1 September2015until August31 2020. City Waitakere legacy for renewal of 5 right its exercise the one to wishes Kindergarten Thecontains renewal. of lease right year with The 2010. September into 1 commencing years entered 5 of term lease a for Council community a has Kindergarten The c)
rs. Two sessions are offered Monday to Friday between 8.30am between Friday to Monday offered are sessions Two rs. TheKindergarten shall have dueregard principlesfor the the of Treatyof Waitangi Department the of Education non independent an maintain To local the area of community the and families children, of development the to contribute positively To education pre of to particular, provision the promote To and relevantChildcare Regulations, childrento the ofthe local area providepre To standard a high of
s August2010 excluding this right of renewal. All other terms and conditions as contained in the existinglease dated20 invitees,contractors and abideagents by Policy; the
stimulate public interest and awareness of the desirability of pre of desirability the of awareness and interest public stimulate of these hours the playground is open to the public. In early 2014 the the 2014 early In public. the to open is playground the hours these of
ncil as a classified local purpose (community buildings) reserve andreserve buildings) (community purpose local classified a as ncil e ocpe pr o to eaae acl o ln nml Part namely land of parcels separate two of part occupies ten rd n fe pa wie olwn te e haii Curriculum Whaariki Te the following while play free and ured
n Incorporated Society on 12 September 1989. The 1989. September 12 on Society Incorporated n - - schooleducation, within current the guidelines the of profit making kindergarten facilit kindergarten making profit
- col dcto wti te oa ae ad in and, area local the within education school and in the knowledge that they make a valued a make they that knowledge the in and
- y duly licensed by by licensed duly y
4.30pm catering to catering 4.30pm
the period the
balanced - Pa school ge
10 -
16. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideration 15. 14. 13. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 22A MinnehahaIncorporated, Titirangi Avenue, variation ofRenewal and communityto lease Park Community Kindergarten Woodlands Authorisers Authors Signatories A No. Attachments 20. 19. Implementation 18. impact Māori statement 17.
There isnocost implication associatedwith approval the therenewalof communityof lease. Significance Policy. recommenda The There are nochanges in oruse operational activities beingconducted on theland. renewalcommunityof lease. The Councilsoughtstaff input from Councilhavestaff soughtinput relevantfrom councildepartments. their having consider withvariation a only to include Auckland Council’sthe Smoke to has Kindergarten asked The are cur Plan. its on communitylease their continue to wish they Outcomes that advised renewal Community a of include to varied right lease community a exercising groups Community the of activities the to onsite. due limited i members regarding paperwork Confidential children. are the teach to resources the building the stores that of rooms the of layout the and week each Friday to Mondayoccurring Kindergarten use for opportunities Sharing
Waitākere Ranges Local Board is the allocated authority to approve the granting of a of granting the approve to authority allocated the is Board Local Ranges Waitākere
Whau Glenn Boyd GrahamBodman DonnaCooper Incorporated, WoodlandsPark Hall, 22AMinnehaha Avenue, Titirangi Aerialphotograph Title
in cnand n hs eot o o tigr h Acln Council Auckland the trigger not do report this in contained tions
-
Relationship ManagerHenderson -
CommunityLeaseAdvisor
- -
Manager Woodlands Park CommWoodlands Park
the Local the Board portfolio holderon February16 2015.
-
CommunityDevelopmen
unityKindergarten - Massey, Ranges,Waitakere - FreePolicy. t, Artst, and Culture
rent terms and conditionsand terms rent
s also held also s
Page Page Page 13 11
Item 12
Woodlands ParkHall, Woodlands Park,22AMinnehaha Avenue, Titirangi AttachmentA:Aerial photograph May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local 22A MinnehahaIncorporated, Titirangi Avenue, variation ofRenewal and communityto lease Park Community Kindergarten Woodlands
Board
–
Woodlands ParkCommunityWoodlands Kindergarten Incorporated,
playground Kindergartenand Community Woodlands Park
Page Page 13
Attachment A Item 12
2. ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpose FileNo.: properties SeaviewPiha Walkway May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board SeaviewPiha Walkway 8. Background Comments d) c) b) a) That the Recommendation/s 7. 6. 5. 4. 3.
aka i peetd hy ol pee t fr acs drcl t lgl od ahr than rather road legal to directly access apply councilto form an for easement. to prefer would they prevented is walkway propert their currentvehicleto accesstheir if confirmed has ValleyRoad beach 30 reserve anddonot wish apply to an for easement. the over garage their to access vehiclerequire not do they confirmed has Road Seaview 71 and fence boundary a constructed recently have Road realigned vehicle accesswithin bou the Valley Beach 32 of owners The r and createlegal vehicle to access their properties have delayedefforts to resolve matter. the disputes boundary ownership, of Change Pihacommunity regarding vehicles accessingprivate property over the walkway. the of members (LSP)from Parks West Sports andwith Local wereraised concerns 2010 In Local as managed is which Walkway, Purpose (Accessway)Rese Seaview across properties their of parts vehicle to obtained have access Road Valley Beach 32 and 30 Road, Seaview 71 properties, Three removalof unauthorised vehicle acces RangestheLocal the BoardWaitakere for seeksupport from isto reportthis purpose of The subdivision of a portion of the Piha Block. Along with the other reserves within this this legaleasementsno registered Seaviewon Walkway. within as reserves managed now is other and 1961 LocalPurpose (Accessway)Reserve Reservesto the pursuant 1977. Act Currently arethere Act the Amendment Counties with the of 44(3) Along Section under Block. 1967 Piha original the the of of subdivision,wasit subsequentlyvested time as Plantation Reserve portion the at a 1933 in of Crown subdivision the in vested was Reserve Walkway Seaview Requiresinstallation ofsignage promoting Seaview Walkway. stating Road Valley Beach 71 access to the garageof isnot permitted across Seaview LIMWalkway. the on note file a of registering the Requires safe improving and pe fencing boundary extending to regard with Road Valley Beach 71 of owners with the work continuingto staff Parks West Sports and Local Supports Walkway,6 months thefrom date of this Local Board resolution. Valley Beach the at barriers vehicle of installation Approves destrianaccess at the of top walkway. the Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
CP2015/04686
-
Unauthorised vehicle accessUnauthorised properties to private
-
rve pursuant Reservesto the Act1977. Unauthorisedvehicle access toprivate
s overs Seaview Reserve Walkway Piha. in ndaryof theirproperty.
lcac b piae rpry wes to owners property private by eluctance
od n o Seaview of end Road in the County of Countyin the of in Waitemata
y over the the overy Page Page
15
Item 13 Item 13 SeaviewPiha Walkway 19. 18. 17. 1 15. Beach30 Valley Road 14. 13. Seaview71 Road 12. Beach32 Valley Road General 11. 10. 9. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 6.
avoid collisions. to retained is 32 number at driveway the of visibility good that and road the to on reverse to within manoeuvreto t space ensureenough to need the highlighted Auckland vehicles. two least at achievablehowever is road legal for to directly access vehicle formingconfirmed has Transport parking vehicle accommodate to enough large is t adjacent that area lawn flat the develop to be may option cost lower alternative An tank relocation,driveway formationand constructionof a retainingwall and boundary fence. vehicle Creating easementanseek from council. to reserve the than rather road legal across to access form accessto prefer would they existing terminated, be to is property the their of use if that advised have owners current The on thatfile the plans show driveway the within owne the be to comingthe off appearedreserve, and would relocatedonto be property needto the driveway the that identified owner, then the to Council, City Waitakere the lett A 1). attachment (refer Road a Valley Beach shows to directly house driveway separate existing the to extension an for permit 1990 A increased. has crossings of number property,the and the on haveoccurred worksunauthorised of number a 1990Since three at walkway the from separatelocations, approximately achieved 22m and5m, 37m from Beach the ValleyRoad boundary. is Road Valley Beach 30 to access vehicle Currently the future. re to plans have theyFurthermore 4.2m thefrom reserve boundarysufficient is and there practical withinaccess property. their of L theynotdo not do require vehicleManageracross access record thewalkway theirto asgarage it isset back the to writing no in confirmed is have Road Seaview there 71 of owners and The plan site the with accordance in authorisedvehicle crossings. built incorrect been an not and has Road garage Seaview to an directly house access the showed of location it that in incorrect was plan Abuilding permit was a issuedin garage 1986 for that fronts walkway. the approved The site walkwayand realigned v Recentlyowners the of 32 Beach ValleyRoad constructeda fence along theboundary of the access vehicle and fro boundary reluctanceRoad to cease use or formalise accessover the walkwayhave slowedprogress. and the Road regarding Valley Beach dispute 32 to a alignment Road, Seaview 71 at of ownership change however 2010; since place taken have issue the resolve to attempts Numerous forma other any or easements access. legal has the properties fronted the also of Road None Seaview 71 at garage a that walkway. found was it investigation, further Upon ValleyRoad. Beach 32 and 30 walkway to the over vehicleaccess private about West Sport and Local with concerns raised community Piha the of members after Road. ShortlyValley Beach 30 of boundary the along walkway the down running drain open an of I n 2010 repairs and maintenance work was carried out to alleviate health and safety issues safety and health alleviate to out carried was work maintenance and repairs 2010 n
-
Unauthorised vehicle accessUnauthorised properties to private
access to the existing parking areas within the property will require septic require will property the within areas parking existing the to access
ehicle access to their property. pooe grg i rlto t Lt onais I adto the addition In boundaries. Lot to relation in garage proposed d
- locate or rebuild or locate the garage in a more suitable location in in location suitable more a in garage the
r’s property.r’s te wes f 0 ec Valley Beach 30 of owners the m he site to avoid the need need avoid the to site he areet permitting agreements l
–
it wasit noted then er in 1990 from from 1990 in er SP West that West SP
o the road the o s Parks s Page Page 16
22. Localboard views and implications Consideration 21. 20. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board SeaviewPiha Walkway Authorisers Authors Signatories D C B A No. Attachments 23. Implementation
improvingsafe pedestrianentry and exit to and from the of top the with regard extendingto boundary between fencing theirproperty and the walkway and ValleyRoad entrance walkwayto the andwith work owners the of 71 Beach ValleyRoad LSPstaff will West commission the installation ofappropriate vehicle barr undertakenare to improve this reserve. ensure thatthe private accessways Seaviewacross removedare Walkwayand thatworks TheLocal Board has the delegation to make decisionson vehicle access. vehiclebefore access bollards are placed atthe Beach ValleyRoad entrance toprevent A6 month periodgrace issought allowto t pedestrians of and cyclists using thewalkway. safety the compromising further and Road Valley Beach 30 exiting and entering vehicles for has Road Valley Beach walkway The iswell byPihaused residents. The constructedfence along boundary the 32 of
Ian Max Ian Whau Glenn Boyd Dafydd Pettigrew TopographicalSurvey Site Photos BuildingPlans Beach32 ValleyRoad Seaviewwalkway aerial Title
-
Unauthorised vehicle accessUnauthorised properties to private
well
- -
Relationship ManagerHenderson
GeneralManager Parks, Sports and Recreation narrowed the entrance to the walkway considerably limiting visibility limiting considerablywalkway the to entrance the narrowed
-
Parksand OpenSpace Specialist
he ownershe addressto the relocation oftheir
-
Massey, Ranges,Waitakere localparks. Support issought to -
Region Wide walkway.
iers atiersthe Beach
Page Page Page 25 23 21 19 17
Item 13
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board SeaviewPiha Walkway
-
Unauthorised vehicle accessUnauthorised properties to private
Page Page 19
Attachment A Item 13
SeaviewPiha Walkway May14 2015 WaitākereRanges
- LocalBoard
Unauthorised vehicle accessUnauthorised properties to private
Page Page
21
Attachment B Item 13
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board SeaviewPiha Walkway
-
Unauthorised vehicle accessUnauthorised properti to private es
Page Page 23
Attachment C Item 13 Attachment C Item 13 SeaviewPiha Walkway May14 2015 Waitā kere Rangeskere Local Board
-
Unauthorised vehicle accessUnauthorised properties to private
Page Page 24
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board SeaviewPiha Walkway
-
Unauthorised vehicle accessUnauthorised properties to private
Page Page 25
Attachment D Item 13
2. ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpose FileNo.: TeHenga/Bethells Beach NorthernNew Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Protection Framework for May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach 11. 10. 9. 8. 7. C b) a) That the Recommendation/s 6. 5. 4. 3.
omments
Receives the Northe the Receives landowner considering when particularly Henga, Bethells/Te approvaleventor permit applications. at dotterels of protection inc are recommendations of number A Dotterel/T Zealand attemptto minimise thethreats to dotterels that canassociatedbe with beachactivities. an in staff Council New Auckland by developed been has A) (Attachment Beach Henga/Bethells Northern The withaverage an of twoper pairs year using thedune systemas breeding habitat. endan The TeHenga/Bethells Beach isalso apopular location for filmingand event applications. a in participate range ofactivities. who visitors of number large a attracts regularly Beach Henga/Bethells Te Wait Dotterel/T the For nagrd otrl y iiiig h ipcs soitd ih ciiis t Te Regional at and Biosecurity Biodiversity, West, activities Parks Sports and with Local Council’s Auckland associated framewo impacts protection The the minimising by Henga/BethellsBeach. Dotterel/T the of dotterel protection the in Zealand assist endangered to aims A, Attachment New as available Beach, Henga/Bethells Northern through success reproductive The and survival dotterel to treat destruction,disturbance and predation. potential a all are events, and filming beach, the on use vehicle walking, dog riding, horse as, such Activities typicallyinbe found the dunesystem at Henga/Bethells Te Beach. dotterels/t Zealand NewNorthern of pairs breeding two of average annual An which,due itsto classification an as endangered species, requiresprotection. dotterel/t Zealand New Northern The to framework protection protect Northern the NewZealand dotterel/t the within actions/conditions recommended the Approves TeHenga/Bethells Beach. Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
CP2015/04818
ū gered Northern New Zealand Dotterel can be found at Te Henga/Bethells beach,Henga/Bethells Te at found be can Dotterel Zealand New Northern gered turiwhatu Protection Framework for Te He ā kere Ranges Local Board to receive the Northern New Zealand Zealand New Northern the receive to Board Local Ranges kere
rn New Zealand Dotterel/T Zealand New rn
k a be dvlpd s rsl o te olbrto between collaboration the of result a as developed been has rk
ū
uiht i a edmc rud etn shorebird nesting ground endemic an is turiwhatu luded in the framework that aims to assist in the the in assist to aims that framework the in luded ū turiwhatu at TeHenga/Bethells Beach. ū ū turiwhatu Protection Framework for Te Te for Framework Protection turiwhatu turiwhatu Protection Framework for Te Te for Framework Protection turiwhatu ū turiwhatu Protection Framework for Framework Protection turiwhatu nga/BethellsBeach.
ū
turiwhatu can turiwhatu
Page Page habitat
27
Item 14 Item 14 NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Frame Protection ensure to place in put be filming doesnotnegativelyshould dotterels.onimpact Specifically: conditions parks, on events for approval landowner of part As andEvent filming permits Dogs General 13. 12. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Therecommended Keycontactsat Henga/Bethells Te Beach are listed within the framework. as such stakeholders local Conservation andBeth as well as units, Park preventor restrict vehicles using beach the at times when the fledglingsare vulnerable. (Marchperiod fledging the during adjusted be should conditionsevent or Filming the to restricted be should personnel event and designated filming all system, dune the within for approved is activity If avoided. be should system dune the within activity event or Filming for lookout sho to vehicle a of front in distance vehicle the spotted, isdotterel a If metrebeach. the anyvehicleson for used be shoulddotterels) ten a at in walking (person spotter A Allandfilming events o restrictionsin place if required. to contacted be can Council Auckland within unit dotterels Biodiversity when the breeding; considered are be should prohibition a of way by restrictions dog Temporary restrictionsand consequences ofdisturbing wildlife. ensure to reviewed be should signage and rules access Dog for Management Animal to reported be should control enforcement under of bylaws. the be not to seen dogs Any what (March as well areareas place in to protect them(see months as Appendix A). beach, the fledging at present about during owners chicks dog dotterel educate particularly and inform should rangers) and park (e.g. staff season, Council Auckland breeding the During particularly chicks, dotterel fledging for lookout the when usin on be can they so activity breeding dotterel about informed Lifeguards Beach Bethells the keep should staff Council Auckland habitat. the monitor should wellas any beachactivities mig that ranger as summer area, dune and beach the Henga/Bethells of patrol their doing whilst Te dotterels of activities and location the period fledging the During ac key at placed be should dotterels of presence the about public informing signage Appropriate Vehicles are required to travela at speedslower than 10 kilometresper hour (km/h). Keep a minimumdistance often metres dotterelsfrom at all times.
uld move no furtherand wait until the bird has area.left the
cesspoints during thebreeding season.
g a beach g patrolvehicle.
tracks.
actions/conditions
ellsBeach SurfLife Saving n beach the should berequired to stay below high the tide mark.
hthavingbe adverseimpacts theon dotterelsand their
outlined in the frameworkare: work Te for Henga/Bethells Beach
.
ehls ec Cr, eatet of Department Care, Beach Bethells
eeat o blw ad access and bylaws dog relevant
the public is informed of the of informed is public the
put these put -
April) to to April) Page Page -
April),
28
16. Implementation 15. impact Māori statement 14. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideration May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach Authorisers Authors Signatories A No. Attachments 17.
the the relevantdogaccess rules. Additionalis budget required signage installed be for to informing of dotterel presenceand of land considering when staff Council Auckland ownerapproval and event/filming ap by used be should Beach Henga/Bethells The report.this M for impact or change significant no is There Weststaff to developthe dotterel protection framework for Henga/Bethells Te Beach. loc The
oten e Zaad Dotterel/T Zealand New Northern
al board chair and the environmentalalchair boardand the portfolio LocalParks and holderSports directed W Glenn Boyd Maxwell Ian Kaitlyn White Henga/Bethe NorthernNew Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu ProtectionFramework for Te Title
hau
- - llsBeach
Relationship ManagerHenderson GeneralManager Parks, Sports and Recreation -
ParkAdvisor
plications.
ū
turiwhatu Protection Framework for Te Te for Framework Protection turiwhatu ā ori associa ori - Massey, Ranges,Waitakere ted with the recommendation in recommendation the with ted
Page Page Page 31 29
Item 14
March 2015 Beach Henga/Bethells for Te Tūturiwhatu Dotterel/ NewZealand Northern May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local B NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach 2009 Hoskins Greg beach, Bethells at with chick parents Dotterel 1: Image
Protection Framework Framework Protection oard
Page Page 31
Attachment A Item 14 Attachment A Item 14 NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach consideringa landowner approval application. at TeHenga/Bethells beach are outlined in documentthis and should be consideredwhen Aucklandon Councilland.Anumber of recommendedactio Henga/Bethellsbeach and should help ensureto these native birdsare being sufficiently protected dotterel This protection frameworkwill inassist the managementof endangeredthis species at Te vehicles,horses,riding motorbikes and land yachts on the bea stress),includes people wanderingand walking their dogsin the dunesnear nesting sites, at TeHenga /BethellsBeach thatendanger dotterels directlyboth and indirectly ( 2002and predator control since 2005, within the TeHenga/Bethells beach dunesystem. Auckland CouncilBiosecurity unitand local volunteers have beencarrying out controlrabbit since Wait sand, rarelyutilising Henga/Bethellsbeach tend to nest and sleep in therear dunes amongst the native vegetationand averageOn two dotterel pairsbreed at TeHenga/Bethells beacheach year. dotterels The at Te success. predation,loss, disturbance and tidesbeing potential threats to d sandybeaches and sandspits. Thedotterel is classified as an endangered species,with habitat TheNorthern NewZealand dotterel/tūturiwhatu isa groundnesting shorebird usuallyonfound ExecutiveSummary May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ākereriver mouthand the Lake outletWaiataru furthersouth.
the the openbeach. Theycan typically be infound thesand dunesbetween the
ns/conditions to help protectdotterels ch. otterel survivaland reproductive
i.e .by inducing
Activiti Page Page es 32
Physicaldescription 1700individuals in 2004 (Dowding&Davis 2007). Cl Zealand dotterelisclassified as an endangered species according tothe NewZealand Threat Kawhiathe on west coastand southwards Bayto Plenty of on east the coast. Northern The New estuaries. TheNorthern N nestingshorebird thatcan typicallybe sandyonfound sandbeaches, spits or onfeeding tidal subspecies ofdotterel thatare endemic Newto Zealand. New The Zealand dotterelis a ground TheNorthern NewZealand dotterel/tūturiwhatu ( DotterelEcology May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local B NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach Hoskins). beach (Greg at Henga/Bethells Te dunes fore in chick Dotterel 2: Image Hoskins). (Greg beach Henga/Bethells at Te adult Dotterel 1: Image disproportionallyandlong theirheads appear fusiformwith thebody. haveChicks snowywhite plumage with a speckledappea During thebreeding season (winter/spring) the chest plumage becomes a burntorange/red colour. and legs.grey Adults have grey/brown plumage top,onwith off Thedotterel is a small, squat bird with large a head and strong beak. hasIt black eyes, assification Systemand isatrisk of extinction after population the declined toapproximately
ewZealand distribution dotterel spans Northfrom Capesouthwards to
oard
3: Dotterel Image
Cha
radrius obscurusaquilonius) ranceon theirback. Theirlegs are
eggs (Andy Spence). eggs
- white plumage ontheir belly.
isone of two a blackbill Page Page 33
Attachment A Item 14 Attachment A Item 14 NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach encounterdogs. will sightkeep of humans nearby. A greaterdistance is maintained bythe birds when they allowhumans app to dotterelsperceive to dogsof be greaterdanger thanhumans dotterelstime spend foraging.Studies ofthreat responses (Lord wing.Responses to higherperceived threatar provoke arunning or flight response anda high perceived threat includemight a faking broken Dotterelavoidance behaviour onoccurs a scale. example,For a low perceived mightthreat Their“chip chip”call isoften hea interspersed movements,periods of stillness, pecking the sand forinsects, and rapid walking. colouring,but also as aresult of the typicallyperiods short of activity largely that consistof of beach. the Dotterels can difficultbe to spotwhen scanning b the NorthernNew Zealand dotterels adult defend territories, which are typicallyconfined toa section Behaviouralcharacteristics disturbance dogsfrom and people. areas to forage.Chick mortality occurcan as a result of extreme wea hatchingand fledging, chicksare not yet able to flyand parents lead chicksto suitable feeding Zeala approximatelyto fly) weeks afterfour hatching (March tidemark. Hatching typically occurs duringJanuary and February with chicks fledging (beginning laideggs, a in scrape in thesand tha typicallyinbeginning September. Eachpair produces averagean of two or threewell camouflaged Breedingpairsbegin to arrive at theirnesting territories from mid Breeding duringautumn and seaweedwood. anddrift Dotterelsconjugate in post feedingbetween thehigh tide markand the waters edge during theday, particularly amongst the timesa day and, like most shore birds, duringfeed day Adultdotterels feedamphipods,on insects, molluscs, and fish crabs. Theytypically several feed Feeding May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board nd dotterelsnd are able towalk and must feed themselves thefrom time they hatch. Between
earlywinter. roach butwill generally try to maintain adistance of at least five metersand
rd beforerd they are seen.
tiscommonly among shells and driftwood above just high the e energyexpensive andmaythereduce amount of - breeding flocksat favoured feedingestuaries - April).Unlike most bird species,New or nightor hours. Dotterels are oftensighted
.
Dotterelsbrowsing beach the will - etal. winteronwards, with nesting each,in due part to their ther events,predators or
1997)have shown that
Page Page 34
cause adultdotterels to abandonand eggs chicks, leaving themvulnerable top morethreat avoidance behaviour. Humanand/or dog intrusionintobreeding sites shownhas to When dottere contributetowards egg, chickand adult mortalityas well as disturbance to adultson nest. the hedgehogsand ratsare themost commonpredators. Uncontrolled dogshave also been known to beach,On the nests can destroyedbe by c withoutpredator control), resulting low in overall population growth. success.Although adults have high a survivalproductivityrate, unmanagedat sites islow (sites Habitatloss, predation, disturbance and tidesare allth Threats May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local B NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach beach the can endanger dotterels. the fastand scaringor runningover birds. Also people r vehiclesnear parking thehigh tide markobstructing birds from foraging,and vehicles driving too inducingstress), include people wanderingand walking dogstheir in dunes the nearnesting sites, Activities Henga/Bethells at Te Beach thatendanger dotterels, both directly and indirectly ( lessto pest management in area. the ofsouth the outlet,Waiataru the reasons forwhich arecurrently unknown, butmay be attributable theon rocky areas at either end of the beach. work. othernative birds freque twohave pairs beennesting within dunes the each year.Fernbirds (mātātā), pipits (pīhoihoi)and Becauseof this work the habitat within dunes the regeneratedhas and since2005approximately 2002and predator control since 2005, within the Auckland CouncilBiosecurity Unitand local volunteers have beencarrying out rabbit control since outlet furthersouth (see Image 5). sand the dunes at sand, rarelyutilising the openbeach (Greg Hoskins Henga/Bethellsbeach tend to nest and sleep in therear dunes amongst the native vegetationand averageOn two dotterel pairsbreed at TeHenga/Be Dotterelsat TeHenga/Bethells Beach threatens,while chicks older typicallytorun the nearest cover and hide (Dowding 2013). consequently dotterelchicks are at risk prior to the period of fledgingas they are unable to andfly are capableavoiding of oncomingan vehicle theyhave if enough timeto avoid thevehicle. However, Vehicles drivingon beach the also can pose a risk success. energyexpenditure as a ofresult threatavoidance behaviour alsocan compromise breeding particularlyby gulls, or nest abandonment leading to egg mortality.In addition, stress induced
There are alsolittle penguins (kororā),petrels and(ōi) furseals (kekeno) thatrest and nest
lsare breeding, particularly during the period after the chickshatch, theyexhibit slower avoidto movingvehicle. a Small chickscrouch and ‘freeze’ when danger themain beachbetween the Waitākereriver mouthand the Lake Waiataru nt the dunent the area as a resultof the habitat restorationand predator control oard
areless dogs,feet, horses andvehicles. Cats,stoats, Dotterelsare not usually foun TeHenga/ Bethells Beach dunesystem.
todotterels and their chicks.An adultdotterel is
Pers.Comms iding horses, motorbikes and land yachts on thellsbeacheach year. dotterels The at Te reats dotterelto survival and reproductive .). Theytypicallycan infoundbe
d in thed in dunes to the
redation,
i.e Page Page .
by 35
Attachment A Item 14 Attachment A Item 14 NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach Hoskins) beach (Greg at TeHenga/Bethells tracks tyre on image centre standing chick Dotterel 4: Image vehicle the convoyincreases equipmentand people involved.There isa greaterrisk of disturbance to dotterels as the size of Filmcrews could bea disturbance to dotterels with chicks,depending on the number of vehicles, busysummerperiods. In addition, filmingand events often requ Life guardand rangervehicles regularlydrive on TeHenga/Bethells Beach, particularly during uncontrolleddogs can pose a threat to thenest if allowed roamto freelythrough dunes. the thereforeregarded beto less atrisk of being discovered damagedor by humans. Howe Thedotterel nests at Te Henga/BethellsBeach are located farback in the anddunes, are May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
.
ire vehicle access beach.to the
ver,
Page Page 36
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local B NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach viewe GIS Council (Auckland 2015 ofas blue, in outlined habitat dune sand of dotterel areas approximate the showing image Aerial 5: Image
oard r).
Page Page
37
Attachment A Item 14 Attachment A Item 14 NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach filming doesnotnegatively dotterels.onimpact Specifically: Aspartof landowner approval f andEvent filming permits Dogs General Henga/BethellsBeach: The followingactions/conditions are recommended in order to minimise threatsto dotterels at Te Recommendations: May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
preventor restrict vehicles using beach the at times when the fledglingsare vulnerable. Filmingor event conditionsshould beadjusted during the fledgingperiod (March designatedtracks. forwithin dune the system,all andfilming event personnel should bere Filmingor event activity within dune the system should avoided. be activityIf isapproved should move no furtherand wait until the bird has area.left the dotterels) shouldused be any for vehicles the on beach. a dotterelIf i Aspotter (person walking at in a ten metredistance in offront a vehicle to lookout for Allandfilming events on beach the should berequired to stay below high the tide mark. restrictionsin place if required. breeding;are Biodiversity the unitwithin Auckland Councilbecan contacted toput these Temporarydog restrictionsand consequences ofdisturbing wildlife. access Dog rules and signage should bereviewed toensure the public isinformed of the enforcementof bylaws. the Anyseen dogs t areareas place in to protect them(see Appendix A). dotterelchicks present at the beach, as well as what relevantdogbylaws and access Auckland Councilstaff (e.g.park rangers) should informand educate dog ownersabout During thebreeding season, and particularly during fledging months( whena beach using patrolvehicle. breedingactivity so they onbecan the lookout for fledgingdotterel chicks, particularly Auckland Councilstaff shouldt keep habitat. wellas any beachactivities that mighthavingbe adverseimpacts on the dotterelsand their locationand activities of dotterelswhilst doing theirpatrol of the beach and dunearea, as During the fledgingperiod the Henga/Bethells Te summer rang accesskey points during thebreeding season. Appropriatesignage informing public about thepresence of dotterels should placed be at Vehicles are required to travel Keep a minimumdistance often metres dotterelsfrom at all times.
restrictions byway aof prohibition should be considered when dotterels o notbe controlunder should be reportedto Animal Management for
orevents parks,on conditions should beput in placeto ensure
a at speedslower than 10 kilometresper hour (km/h).
he Bethellshe Beach Lifeguardsinformed about dotterel
ershould monitor the
sspotted, vehicle the March
stricted to the - April), -
April) to Page Page
38
Localand Sports Parks West callcentre on (09)3010101. implementing protection the framework. These staffbecan contacted via theAuckland Council A Council Auckland KeyContacts May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local B NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach AnimalManagement RegionalParks Biodiversity Biosecurity
numberof different departments within Auckland Councilavailableare to assistwith TeHenga/Bethells enforcementof dog the bylaws. AnimalManagement officers respondto any animal related incidents,including The Unit. Dotterelcorflute signage and informationbrochures are also available from Biodiversity the prohibition,in placeif required. TheBiodiversity Unitcontactedbecan putto temporarydog restrictions,by waya of dotterelp behaviourand ecology, as wellas statistical information regarding thewider Auckland BenParis isa Henga/Bethellslocal community. volunteerswho manage pest the trapsat TeHenga/Bethells, TeHenga/Bethells beach environmentand dune the habitat. Gregiswell known tothe Greg Hoskins isthe Senior Biosecurity Advisor, Plants and has a good knowledge of the TeHenga/Bethel TheEvent Facilitator is themain contact concerning crewfilm activities and otherevents at Manager AdvisorParks RangerPark
RegionalPark Duty Ranger contact number is3695827.09
opulation. -
Localand Sports Parks West.
-
- SeniorBiodiversity Advisor WaitākereRanges.
Waitākere RangesLocalWaitākere Board. lsbeach. Beach summerranger.
oard
and hasinan
- depth knowledge dotterel of andhe is known the to Te
Page Page 39
Attachment A Item 14 Attachment A Item 14 NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach Beach Bethells BethellsBeach SurfLife Savinga has regularpresence on TeHenga/Bethells beach. Beach LifeSaving Bethells Surf Zealand's.Mark can be contacted via: 1993and is also theconservation scienceadvisor for Conservation Wildlife of NewTrust MarkBellingham is the main contactBethells for Beach Care.Mark began BethellsBeach VegetationNetwork and Auckland Council. theon Henga/Bethells Te dunesystem” and works in cooperation with both theCoastal Dune BethellsBeach Careisdedicated to ‘ecological the restoratio BeachCare Bethells 362(0800 468). injured,or dead, Immediatecontact can should be madevia DOC the hotline 0800onDOC HOT DOCis primary the consultant forna (DOC) ofConservation Department May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Call111any for relatedfire emergency Station 75,Auckland Council, Bethells Rd, Bethells Beach. Phone: Address:Bethells Road, RD2 Wait Website: Email: Phone:09 8109563;
[email protected] +649810 9587 (Club)
www.tehengabethells.co.nz Rural Force Fire
tive species and wildlife.anyIf dotterel isobserved to be sick,
; After ; Hours:
o.nz
ā kere,Bet
. ;
(Dave Comp) hellsBeach, New Zealand. nof the natural vegetation and fauna
+64276645 044
.
Carein Page Page 40
www.nzbirdsonline.org.nz Dowding, J.E.2013. New Zealand In dotterel. Miskelly, C. 15 82, northern NewZealand DotterelCharadrius obscurus aquilonius chicks. Lord,A. Joseph,R.; W.; Innes,J. (1997).W. Effects of Human Activity behaviour the on of (2001). J. Mark, W.; J. Innes, Conservation R.; Joseph, W.; A. Lord, Bibliography May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local B NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach 2004 Dowding, Davis,J.E.; A.M. New2007: Zealand dotterel(Charadrius obscurus)recovery plan, – 14. 14. ThreatenedSpecies RecoveryPlan 58. Departmentof Conservation, Wellington.28 - 20.
,98, 233
- 240.
oard
M.(ed.) New Zealand Birds Online. e Zaad dotterels. Zealand New BiologicalConservation
Biological Page Page
, 41
Attachment A Item 14 Attachment A Item 14 NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach owner's Dog obligations under dog the managementbylaw to: are owners' Dog obligations under Dog the Control1996Act are to: Control Dog Act 1996. Thebylaw contains dog owners'obligations ontrolpoliciesbylaws.aspx http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/licencesregulations/dogsandanimals/dogrules/Pages/dogc For moreinformation on Councilpolicies andbylawsdogsonvisit: areas access TeHenga/Bethells beach dotterel protection anddog access AppendixA: AucklandRelevant Council dog management bylaws and May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Be familiarand observe whereare dogs not allowed. Be familiarand observe where Be familiarand observe whereare dogs allowed controlunder off a leash; Ensure dog doesnotinjure, endanger or distress anyanimal; Carrya leashin public places,even if the dog isallowedunder Ensure dog isundercontrol at all times or is confined;
.
dogsare allowed controlunder on a leash;
that are additional to alreadythose contained in the
controloff a leash;
Page Page 42
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local B NewNorthern Zealand Dotterel/Tūturiwhatu Framework Protection Te for Henga/Bethells Beach areasaccess maychange followinga review of dog bylaws. Mapshowing dog the on leash/off leash/dogs prohibited areas relevant as of March2015. Dog
oard
Page Page 43
Attachment A Item 14
2. ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpose FileNo.: Auck May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board TransportAuckland 6. 5. 4. 3. Comments b) a) That the Recommendation/s
cover the cost of the construction phase for the Mountain Road walkway between between walkway Road Mountain Opanuku Roadand Opanukupipeline track. the for phase construction the of cost the cover th Approves walkway Road Mountain the for phase between OpanukuRoad and Opanuku pipelinetrack. design detailed and consultation to the Fund Capitalstart Transport Board Local its from $50,000 of allocation the Approves of side northern the on Geocell with Mountain Road. walkway gravel a and side, southern the on surface optionby both and AucklandWRLB Transportis a concrete footpath with a black oxide finish Opanuku the is with connectfootpath and (WRLB) concrete Road, Opanuku existing Board of the west 150m of Local end Ranges the from Waitakere starting walkway the a implement Fund, to proposing Capital Transport their of part As Henderson in walkway Road Mountain va the for construction and design, to detailed budget a the allocate to start board local the from approval seek to is report this of purpose The the finished surface of this walkway. All the options involve a 580m long footpath on the the on footpath long 580m a and, involve options southernside of Mountain feedback and Road, about 170m long on northern the side. the consideration All walkway. this into of surface took finished the options These April. 30 se conditions on workshop Transport a Auckland by at Board Local staff the to presented and developed, were options Three option for footpath and the preliminaryconstruction cost estimation. recommended identifyingthe wasproduced report feasibilitystudyinvestigationa initial their site investigationpossiblewalkway’s the andevaluation optionsfor of of Asa result material. Inves Transport Auckland road the of side southernOpanuku Pipelinetrack. the on footpath the at concrete ending and Road) Road/Opanuku Mountainintersection the from west existing150m (approx. of o end the comprises at walkway commencing Road Mountain proposed The Road Mountain the for phase investigation walkway, the between Road, Opanuku and Opanuku pipelinein track Henderson Valley. start to Fund Capital Transport their from Boa Local Ranges Waitakere the 2014 November In landTransport lley. Wai
CP2015/08417
tākere RangesLocal Board:
-
Mountain Road e allocation of $175,000 from its Local Board Transport Capital Fund to Fund Capital Transport Board Local its from $175,000 of allocation e t by Road Maintenance regarding the type of the materials that will be used for used be will that materials the of type the regardingMaintenance Road by t
-
MountainRoad
iain Design & tigation
-
et em wr ivle i ognsn the organising in involved were Team, West
rd approved the allocation of $15,000 of allocation the approved rd a apoiae egh f 750m of length approximate an f pipeline track. The preferred The track. pipeline
Page Page 45
Item 15 Item 15 TransportAuckland Authorisers Authors Signatories A No. Attachments 11. 10. Implementation 9. impact Māori statement 8. 7. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideratio May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
needto addressedbe during the detailed design and consenting processes. all willmarshy ground, with sections and reserveroad the in fences vehiclecrossings, walls, including;constraintssteep site Afew their outside properties, inform to be themabout proposed the project. will walkway the where owners, property to letters send to is work, design the toward steps next The HeritageArea for thetype of materials used, and the finishingsurface of the products. RangesWaitakere the oflimitation consideration intothe footpathwill the take of design The report.this i $225,000of cost total A concrete a of consist will finish footpathon the southern that side,and a gravel footpathwith Geocellon the northern side. option alternative an for price a requested Board Local The
Whau Glenn Boyd Jonathan Anyon Owena Schuster estimatesCost Mountain Road Walkway Title
-
n Mountain Road
-
Relation
s estimated for this alternative option, which been recommended in in recommendedbeenwhich alternative option, this for estimated s
- -
Elected MemberRelationship ManagerTeam mlmnain f hs rjc, n bfr satn te detailed the starting before and project, this of implementation Elected MemberRelationship Manager ship ManagerHenderson
sections, existing mature trees, powerexistingpoles,sections,retaining mature trees,
- Massey, Ranges,Waitakere
Page Page
Page 47 46
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board TransportAuckland
-
Mountain Road
Page Page
47
Attachment A Item 15
2. ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpose FileNo.: Round2014/2015Two WaitakereRanges Local Board Discretionary Community Funding May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding 2014/2015 Table One: WaitakereRanges Local Board community applications,funding round two a) That the Recommendation 5. 4. 3.
e Matua Grace Trust Black The Kotahitanga Te Kaitiakitanga O Makaurau Tamaki andTe Single Trust Parent's Society Auckland Incorporated House Community Titirangi ProjectLitefoot Trust Community Preschool Trust Piha Organisation
declineeach application in this round. Considersthe applications listedin TableOne and agreesto part fund, fundor Sevenapplications have beenreceived, requesting aof total $40,453. secondand finalround in this financialyear. the is which two,round for received those are time this at considered be to applications The of remaining balance a leaves $15,131 forround two. which organisations, seven to budget programme funding community its from $7,500 allocated Board Local Ranges Waitakere the one, round Under fundingbudget of $22,631. 2014 the For for receivedRangesLocal Board is requiredto part fund, 2014 applications Programme Funding the Community present Board Local to Ranges isWaitakere report this of purpose The
Waitākere Ran Waitākere
CP2015/03748
- 5 iaca ya, h atkr Rne Loc Ranges Waitakere the year, financial 15
ges Localges Board:
rehearsal at Lopdell House between May 2015 to to 2015 May between House Lopdell at rehearsal outreachthe and operation for fees and administration permits and hire venue hire, car marketing, and advertising equipment, and fee fee, technician’s choreographer’s fee, dancer’s the Towards netball indoor between fees July2015to July2016 and fees facilitator hall, Towards 2015to June 2015 House Community Titirangi the for chairs new of delivery and purchase the Towards to November2015 2015 May between Club Golf Park Redwood and Club Bowling Piha the in c Liteclub Project the installation and purchase the Towards Preschool Community Piha between July December2015to 2015 the at playball run to Auckland West Playball of costs the Towards Funding f
or
-
fund ordecline these applications. -
Round Two 2014/2015
ewe May between
l or st ttl community total a set Board al ss of osts
3,400$ 1,616$ 3,660$ 2,587$ 6,240$ requested Amount - 5 Te Waitakere The 15. on to f the of two round
- Page Page
49
Item 16 Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding 8. 7. 6. Comments May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Trust Migrant Charitable Services Pasifika Baptist Church Eden Glen Waitakere Trust Sport Free Incorporated Waitakere Violence New Services Trust Settlers Chinese Men Education Trust Essentially
local the help when considering the meritsof each proposal): to guidelines are they rather criteria, eligibility not are (these fund the objectivesof following the by guided be shouldboard local reviewing applications,the When provide to groups assist e withinlocal the board area. to and Waitakere aims initiatives programmes, The Fund projects, Discretionary communities. activities, Community sustainable Board strong, Local developing Ranges in new play organisations the and of implementation recognis board local the the grants, community Through until place in remains Community PolicyGrants 1 Julyon 2015. approach funding community commu interimcontinue the resolved Committeeto Policy Regional and Strategy the March2014, In
the alignment the of proposal the with priorities the of boards; the such as the group’srole in thelocal area benefit the of theproposal to thelocal area o o o o o o o
nity funding approach for the 2014/2015 financial year (REG/20014/36).This interim (REG/20014/36).This year financial 2014/2015 the for approach funding nity
Heritage Recreationand sport Socialcohesion Cultureand arts Th Maori peopleYoung oad vlner ot, profes costs, administration volunteer and supervision and development Towards between May September2015to 2015 programme men’ of ‘Essence and ‘Cruible’ the for Camp Karanga of costs hire venue the Towards November2015 August2015 to September 2015 costs, programme EducationInformation andTraining Expobetween hire, venue resource the Towards Eden Glen the BaptistChurch between May June2015to 2015 at crèche the in air unit an conditioner of installation and purchase the electricity, Towards Juneto 2015 2015 May between facilitatorevent ofNow Play the and for costs equipment of purchase Towards costs to 2015 June 2016 July between Waitakere Free Violence the to communication/marke 2015 July Towards between Lynn Learning December2015 New Settlers New in Chinese Centre the for costs eenvironment
ad te css o te Kiribati the for costs other and s
ting, IT support and rent for rent and support IT ting,
-
Round Two 2014/2015
et ta mk a oiie contribution positive a make that vents es the vital role that community groups community that role vital the es
Total: sional
$ 40,453$ 3,930$ 5,000$ 4,320$ 5,000$ 1,800$ 2,900$
Page Page
board 50
12. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideration 11. 10. 9. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Authorisers Authors Signatories A No. Attachments 15. 14. Implementation 13. impact Māori statement
the applicants the of the local decision.board Following the Ranges LocalWaitakere Board allocating funding forround two, willstaff notify Theallocation of g the in community.groups other alongside benefit to likely therefore of are Maori range Maori.wide including a groups, to accessible and interest of programme general a is funding Community the Ranges Waitakere Local Board. bo Local Auckland the Elevenapplications werereceived in thisround, with a totalrequested of $40,453. on and publications local networks, Councilwebsite. community local through advertised fun The 2015. March 15 on closed round second The 2014 2014. July 15 the on closed round for scheduled were rounds funding community Two believes be to the best interests of thecommunity. intere of conflicts avoid honestly, act to is board local the duties, fiduciary its with accordance In discretion. board’s local the at allocated is fund This
ard feedback on the community funding applications was sought at a workshop withworkshop a at communityapplications wassought onthe funding feedback ard Whau Glenn Boyd GrahamBodman KimHammond twoApplication 2014/15 Summaries WaitakereRan Title
rantsto community groupsiswithin adopted the annual planbudget.
-
Relationship ManagerHenderson ges Localges Board DiscretionaryCommunity Funding -
CommunityandGrants Support Officer West
-
Manager
-
CommunityDevelopment, Arts and Culture
-
Round Two 2014/2015
- Massey, Ranges,Waitakere st and act in what the local board local the what in act and st - 5 iaca ya. h first The year. financial 15
-
Round
Page Page d was d Page
53 51
Item 16
Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di teachers challenging and trial and error skills, sportsmanship and team play. Playball isphysical a education programme to develo What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? children. areWe requesting funding the for fee to have Playball West Auckland come to thecentre onceweek a for 16 What is Playball What your is project/activity called? West Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website Physical Address
AttachmentA: Waitakere Ranges LocalBoard Discretionary Community Funding
your project/activity?
allocated Year funding WR15_2001 C Susan Fraser Treasurer Andrea Barnes Childhood.Early supportWe ECE students to complete teachers registration and bachelor of Employ qualified early childhood te We workto Ministry of Education Early Childhood guidelines. children aged up to years5 and support transition to primary school. childhoodearly education centres. We offerearly childhood education to areWe a local community Preschool centre 25 minutesaway Education of Preschool children up to 5 years NA Charitabletrust Piha Auckland 0772 North2 Piha Rd New Zeala Piha Auckland 0646 CMB 92 entre Supervisorentre scretionary Community Funding
Piha Community Pr
nd Project activity /Project description - ApplicationSummaries
OrganisationInformation
Roundtwo2014/2015 2014/2015
Funding history Funding
Contact details Contact
$$0.00 Undecided Funding value Playball p fine gross motor skills and hand eye coordination, it
WR15_2001 Application number eschool Trust -
Round Two 2014/2015
achers sourced from within localour area.
Playball Funding purpose
from any other
Page Page
53
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding What the is total cost theof project? Playball Fee 2015/2016 Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby runthe Heart by Foundation which wehave received Playball is linking inwith oneof our goingon project forgoals physical learning, HealthyHeart Award project What expertise does your organisation have in delivering similar projects? through discussion and they act out playball inrole play otheron days increase inphysical activities,coordination etc of the children.children The have interest shown in this As we have had the progra How will you know if you have made this difference? school and our children will beprepared for the next phaseof physical activities. age. Thishas a childrenThe benefitfrom being activeand learn to participate in sport and physical recreation an at early What difference will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity? travel, thisincurs further Playball WestAuckland deliver the programmein houseother similar programmes require thecentre to Preschool children require physical activitiesin curriculumour and thephilosophy of the centre. How have you established there is a need fo Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area willfrom benefit your activity/proje Children and/or young people What the is main sector that benefits? Education or training, Sportsand recreation, Children and/or young people What BarnettHall, Piha (which is attached to the centrewe a rentalpay for the hall to runprogramme) the Where the is activity taking place? newsletters,emails and local websites. PihaThe Community Preschool will ackn How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and 1 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the activity/pro 0 How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the activity/project? 20/07/2015 Indicative dates for the project/activity? excitement every week. PlayballThe teachera is male role model for children,our to which the children shownhave great May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Staff Volunteers are the constituencies your for activity/project?
-
01/07/2016
connection to transition to primaryschool as Playball is also offered the at local primary
costs of transport,extra teaching and staff parent help.
mme runningmme inthe preschool for sometime the parentshave commented theon
owledgeAuckland Councilthrough our noticeboard,
Activity/projectbudget Community Community benefits r this activity/project? $ $ Total costof item $ $ boards? requested fromother Local How much have you
6240.0 6240.00
to dateBronze status.
0 Hours0
0 -
ct?What percentage your of activity takewill
Round Two 2014/2015
in thecentre.
$ $ Amountto be funded by grant ject?
6240.00
100 of total% benefit
Page Page
54
Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other organisation for funding your for activity/project? feel would be detrimental to the physical education ofchildren the in the centre. contributeto towards the costs or will have to consid areWe struggling to cover the cost of the programme. Iffull fundingreceived not we will beasking parents How will y $ What the is total amount you are requesting from the Local Board? $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di 6240.00 1.00 6240.00
ou raise the difference between the total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary)
scretionary Community Funding
$ Amountapp
er reducingfrequency the ofprogramme the which we lied for -
Round Two 2014/2015
ofStatus request
$ Amountreceived
Page Page
55
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding North Community Development West Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organi Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website Physical Address Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
sation
HB15_2001 WR15_2002 allocated Year funding LeagueClub saving them $7,764. In 2014 with funding from Waitakere Ranges weLB implemented Glenora Rugby followed up by an on "Efficiency Action Plan"report, setting out our EDA's recommendations.This is suchheating, as cooling, ventilation and appliance efficiency, resulting in Our Eco engagewith our messageand actions the the club has taken. posters and stickersinstalled are throu amountof waste sent to landfill direct, measurable impacts: reducing electricity and water consumption, the devices, insula Our field team visitsthe club install to energy money for sport inthe process. electricity independent, water neutral and zero waste by 2025, freeing up want to transform community infrast Carolineand Georgina Evers Smith, Brendon McCullum, Marina Erakovic, Sarah Walker, Moss Burmester, Lite 2008 Charitabletrust http://projectlitefoot.org Parnell Auckland 1151 Level 3, Kenwyn1 Street New Zealand Parnell Auckland 1151 Box PO 37 879 General Manager Hamish Reid Partnerships Manager Sarah Macky foottrust is led by ten top NZ sportspeople
-
Design Advisers assessadditional opportunitiesfor greater efficiency
-
OrganisationI
Project Litefoot Trust - 2014/2015
Dunn tion and a waste minimisation programme. These changesdeliver
Funding history Funding Contact details Contact
$$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Un Funding value - LiteClub going assessmentprogramme.
decided
WR15_2002 Application number nformation - Swindell, Barbara Kendall and Daniel Kereopa. We -
– Round Two 2014/2015
and associated carbon emissions. LiteClub
ructure, and the cultureto match, to be ghoutthe club to ensureclub members
LiteClub LiteClub Funding purpose - saving lightbulbs, water –
Michael Campbell, Conrad
- saving Page Page an 56
Central Community Development Central Community Development InitiativesFund E&H Environmental Innovation Fund Waste Minimisation and Central Community Development Central Community Development May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di will meet with club officials and putup collateral to educate members about how they can makesimilar We will install products atthe clubs that reduce will their electricity and water usageand landfill waste. We helpTo additional 2 sports clubs, Bowling Piha Club and Redwood ParkGol What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? - followup - - This includes: RangesLocal Board area. costsThe assoc What your is project/activity? LiteClub What your is project/activity called? Central Community Development West Commu North Community Development Central Community Development South Community Development South Community Development North Community Development West Community Development South Community D West Community Development South Community Development
The costsThe per club involved developing with and hosting LiteMember our website. contractorsThe feesfor implementing each club including: scheduling, installatio costThe ofnew the products weinstall
nity Development
evelopment
iated with theLiteClub programme "implementation" at two sports club inthe Waitakere
WHK1400007 WH14_2007 SCF14_2012 WTA1400011 FR14_2010 MR14_2025 HB2014_2014 HM14_2017 SIF14_2007 WTK14_2016 SIF14_2020 AE1400006 MT1314_300006 EIF14_1001 WMIF14150077 A MT1_141500062 - E1415_100048 scretionary Community Funding
Project activity /Project description
Approved $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$1,633.33 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$2,000.00 Approved $$2,000.00 Approved $$5,000.00 Approved $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$3,655.00 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$2,000.00
-
Round Two 2014/2015
LiteClub LiteClub LiteClub LiteClub LiteClub LiteClub Albert LiteCl Programme Expansion theof “LiteClub” LiteClub LiteClub Project Litefoot's LiteClub LiteClub LiteClub LiteClub LiteClub Waitemata LiteClub Project Litefoot's LiteClub f Club, saveto money for sport. ub
- -
Maungakiekie Hibiscus and Bays n, post
- Eden - club reporting and
- Tamaki
Page Page
57
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding takeWe samples theof club's waste and also record thereduction inweightthrough theirwaste contractor. installed can make accurate projections aboutthe savings each club will make theover lifetime ofnew the products recordWe quantitativedata from each club we visit andthe government's use Energywisecalculations so we How will you know i living more sustainably. community through membersfollowing lead the of their club and making changes intheir own homes and clubroom's will be tidier, warmer and thereforehealthier. There also will benefits be to the wider it'sto keep annual subscriptions down. Thanksto new sorting noticereduction a in their costs immediately afterimplementation and well intofuture, the helping the club Our project will help thetwo clubs to save money theiron What difference will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity? will work with Bowls NZand NZ Golf big(both supporters ours)of to recruit them. registeredyet for LiteClub but havewe identified them as ideal ca surviveto with escalating costs and declining memberships. Piha Bowling and Redwood ParkGolf havenot and implementati await 100 sports clubs throughoutthe North and South Island are our on waiting list,these clubs have registered How have you established there is a need for this activity/project? Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area willfrom benefit your activity/project?What percentage your of activity takewill Environment/sustainability What the is main sec Community support,Sports and recreation, Environment/sustainability What the are constituencies your for activity/project? Piha Bowling Club and Redwood GolfPark Club Where the is activity taking place? Auckland Councils contribu mentioning Auckland Council's support. We will also sendpress a releaseto local media acknowledging detailingsavings the made each at club. We provide will each sports club with a blurb their for newsletter of stakeholders;our on our Facebook pageand we willreport send a to Waitakere We will announce Auckland Council's supporton our website; in our monthly newsletter How wil NZ Golf Bowls NZ WaitakereSport indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and 8 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the acti 0 How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the activity/project? 01/05/2015 Indicative dates for the project/activity? changes May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Staff Volunteers
l youl acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is . We follow up each club implementation withphone a call, survey, re at home.at
-
12/11/2015
f you have made this difference? tor that benefits?
on
-
tion.
this demonstrateshuge a need for our service. Many sports clubs are struggling
Community Community benefits
$ $ bo requested fromother Local How much have you
ards?
National Community Golf Manager Community Development Officier RST 0 Hours0
bills by operating moreefficiently. Each club will -
Round Two 2014/2015 - at
- source bins, lighting and in
ndidatesfor our LiteClub serviceand we
vity/project?
- visit and record this data too.
100 of total% benefit Ranges Local Board
-
which goes to all
sulation, Page Page
58
Lightbulbs Posters and Light Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby We workclosely with national and regiona atmosphere. For every $1 invested in LiteClub wesave $2.60 for sport. savedhave clubs over 16 million litres of waterand stopped over 1,070 tonnes of CO2 entering the electricity, contributing to total savings for sportsour clubs of o Since2011 we'vevisited 490 clubs and changed over 12,000 lightbulbs which havesaved 8 million kWh of What expertise does your organisation have in delivering similar projects? Clubs noticea reduction in their bills immedi May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di FoundationLion Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other organisation for funding your for activity/project? grantrequest. national community grants (for example NZCT) to makeup difference the between total expenditureand the areIf we successful with this grantapplication wewill nationalour use level fundin How will you raise the difference between the total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary) $ What the is $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is total cost theof project? Fixed Costs Administration Promotion scheduling, reporting and followup costLabour associated with implementing, Recycling Stations Water 2587.00 2435.00 5022.00 -
saving devices
total amount you are requesting from the Local Board?
- switch Stickers
scretionary Community Funding
Activity/projectbudget $ $ Amou l sports organisations to promote our programme to clubs.
18000.00 ately. ntapplied for
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total costof item 366.00 499.00 214.00 3092.00 363.00 21.00 444.00 23.00
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ver$2.6 million. Our water saving devices Approved ofStatus request
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amountto be funded by gran 225.00 306.00 131.00 1546.00 363.00 1.00 1.00 14.00
g from MFE and other
$ $ Amountreceived
10500.00
Page Page
5
9
t
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? besturdier chairs and chairscan that be wiped/cl areWe requesting funding the for purchase of complete newchairs to replacethe old ones.These need to What your is project/activity? New chairs forCommunity the House What is West Community Development Funding type Primary office h Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website Physical Address Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development We Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
your project/activity called?
older
Titirangi Community House Society Incorporated
WR15_2003 allocated Year funding Interim Chairperson Gayle Marshall Managing Coordinator Debbie Winter therapy. which run forwhole a day andhalf asupporting day Autisticchildren with music promoting a Natural month running alongsidethe Titirangi Market where havewe a group peopleof times each week as well. Wealso have upopened the whole house day on a drama. Mums and babies prebaby and postbaby classesare run herefew a children, some of which areUkulele, Art, Cartoon and animation haveWe many classesfor peopleolder and classes every day theof week for friendlyatmosphere. leisure,hobbies and pursuitsinstimulating, a inclusiveand enviromentally knowledgeand abilities, makeand maintain friendships, and to enjoy beTo able to offer opportunitiesfor the people Titirangiof to expand their 1978 Incorporated society ht Titirangi Auckland 0642 500 South Titirangi Road New Zealand Titirangi Auckland 0642 Box PO 60120 st, WaitakereRanges tp://www.titirangihouse.co.nz
New New chairs for the Community House
Project activity /Project description -
OrganisationInformation
2014/2015
Funding history Funding Contact details Contact
$$0.00 Undecided Funding value
Healing and HealthDay. alsoWe have classes2 a week
eaned easily thus having along life.
WR15_2003 Application number -
Round Two 2014/2015
New chairs forCommunity the House Funding purpose
, French, and
their Page Page 60
We alreadyWe acknowledge council on brochu our How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and 1 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the activity/project? 0 How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the activity/project? 31/05/2015 Indi andbacks the of the chairs breaking.keep oldThe chairs (many of whichbroken) are need replacing. are They made of material which is shabby, dirty May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di What the is total amount you are requesting $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is total cost theof project? $2,030.00 $1,630 Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby Purchase previousof chairs and other furniture. What expertise does your organisation have in delivering similar projects? usersHouse feedbackverbal and commentsfrom othercommunity. How will you know if you have made this difference? Community houseusers will have safer chairs to What difference will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity? Commentsfrom houseusers in regard to the state of the chairs. Also the amountof chairs thathave broken. How have you established there is a need fo Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area willfrom benefit your activity/proje Community support What the is main sector that benefits? Children and/or young people Education or training, Community support, Environment/sustainability, Arts, cultureand/or heritage, What the are constituencies your for activity/pro CommunityAt the House Where the is activity taking place? newsletter. Also on newour website whichbeing is revamped atthe moment.
10.00 1630.00 Staff Volunteers cative dates for the project/activity?
.00
-
30/06/2015
scretionary Community Funding
Activity/projectbudget
Community Community benefits r this activity/project? from the Local Board? re and annual AGM report as wellour as quarterly
situpon. They will look moreinviting they as willnew. be ject? $ $ $ Total costof item $ $ boards? requested fromother Local How much have you
2030.00 1630.00 1570.00
0 Hours0
-
ct?What percentage your of activity takewill
Round Two 2014/2015
$ $ $ Amountto be funded by grant
2030.00 1630.00
100 of total% benefit
Page Page
61
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other organisation for funding your for activity/project? Applyto other funders How will you raise the difference between the total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary) $ May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 1630.00
$ Amountapplied for
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ofStatus request
$ Amountreceived
Page Page
62
Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di West Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website Physical Address Healthy Options create Healthy Choices which create Healthy Lifestyles and Healthy Auckland Single Parent’s Trust and TeKaitiakitanga Tamaki Makaurau o Matuate
without family interaction. celebrations area single parentsand their youth themselves. Group Easter, Xmas and other holidayfamily and youth social and recreational eventsand activitiesdesigned by volleyball, rugbytouch and soccer) youth committee meetings, weekend and andcamp activity costsfunded, weekly sport’s social competitions, ( relevanttopics to single parent needs, camps every 3 months with children’s centralsouth, and north), workshops and presentations often with speakers on families. Theseinclude monthly support meetings activitiessocial and events designed toempower single parents and their Ourholds trust a variety of adult, youth and family recreational, educational and give to receive and long term practical support throughself a whilstthey build/rebuild identities, weprovide knowledgeand options alongside best they can be.Wefocus the on needs of single parent family success, and empowerWe single parents (mums, dads)and their families (children) beto the 2005 n/a Charitabletrust http://www.singleparents.org.nz Glen Eden Auckland 0602 123 Solar Rd, New Zealan Glen Eden Auckland 0641 Box PO 20146 HM15_2021 allocated Year funding Chairperson Angela Roberts Treasurer JulieWhitehouse scretionary Community Funding
d -
OrganisationInformation
2014/2015
Rol lso held especiallyfor familiesborn outside New Zealand and Funding history Funding Contact details Contact
Kotahitanga become role models for newer members. e Modelling $$0.00 Undecided Funding value
WR15_2005 Application number
-
Round Two 2014/2015
- help networkof single parents who Lifestyles and Healthy Role Modelling Choices which createHealthy Healthy Options create Healthy Funding purpose
in 4 areas Aucklandof (west,
netball, Page Page 63
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding between parents, young adults and teenagers. healthyhobby providing healthy friendships for supportnetwor we would liketo run workshops assisting single parents to build healthy identities and then offer them a Buildingiden healthy What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? Netball Fees, workshop hall hire,facilitator and cost childcarecost. What your is project/activity? Healthy Options create Healthy What your is project/activity called? Central Community Development North Community Development West Community Development South Community Development South Community Development South Community Development South Community Development South Community Development South Community Development South Community Development Central Community Development West Community Development West Community Development May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
tities means making healthy choicesand likewe to provide healthy options. To do this, CGAF1_141500011 CGF1 CWF15_1007 PA15 MO15 OP15 MO15 PA15 MA15 HK15 CDC15 WR15_2005 WH15_2015
Choices which create Healthy Lifestyles and HealthyRole Modelling - - 5_1015 - - 1003 2018 - 2020 2017 - - - 2012 1008 2019 1031
Project activity /Project description
Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$2,000.00 Approved $$0.00 Undecided $$0 .00
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ks andks healthycommunication and closeness
Healthyhobbies and good role Modelling Papakura 2015/2016 HealthyHobbies and Good Role Modelling Manurewa 2015/2016 HealthyHobbies and Good Role Modelling 2015/2016 (Howick) HealthyHobbies and Good Role Parent Families HealthyHobbies, Healthy Single Lifestyles and Healthy Role Modelli Choices which createHealthy Healthy Options create Healthy Lifestyles and Healthy Role Modelling Choices which createHealthy Healthy Options create Healthy Single Parent's You'reBrilliant Single Parent's You'reBrilliant Single Parent's You'reBrilliant Single Parent Workshops Otahuhu 2014/2015 Si 2015/2016 Modelling Otara HealthyHobbies and Good Role 2015/2016 modelling Mangere ngle Parents are Brilliant Mangere
- Papatoetoe - Otahuhu
Page Page
64 ng
-
as single parents themselvesare making trusts/societies so they can do things to help single parents inthe website. Everyone know will and the news will travel across many websitesgiving supportfor single pare followWe recommendation from the Auckland Council and add'thank a toyou' thecouncil on our main How will you acknowledge indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and 0 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the activity/project? 10 How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the activity/project? 01/07/2015 Indicative dates for the project/activity? May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di We'vebeen doing this for years8 now and we'velearned alot lessonsof theon way. This isan extension of What expertise does your organisation have in deliveri advantage of other services. positivesimply learning by are they normal and seeing others inworsesituations. We will see them take suicidesand homicides), options a begin making goals and reaching them. for In the short run we savelives by giving(we hope stop both seeWe radical changein both adults and children from a year onwards. They arehappier, copebetter and How will you know if you have made thi players which is very good singlefor parent families who often breakapart. hobby and by doing so, they role model something positive and healthy. All affected become will team servicesas they will connectwith the group which will benefit thewh parentsand teens will buildfriendships healthy and supportnetworks. They will advantagetake of our other rebuilding. benefit Itwill their he bringIt will single parents out isolation,of anger, depression and basically give them a reason to keep What difference will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity? board membersran netball leaguess so many that eventually, inthenot haveWe recently started it inWestAuckland and there's alot familiesof that wantinvolved.to get There's How have you established there is a need for this activity/project? Whau Henderson Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of th What local board area willfrom benefit your activity/project?What percentage your of activity takewill Other: Single Parent Families, What the is main sector that benefits? peo Community support,Sports and recreation, Health, mental health disability, or Children and/or young What the are constituencies your for activity/project? Veronica26 Street, New Lynn Where the is activity taking place? are happy to do what is required of our community. Also, community groups and churches follow our movesand where getwe funding. Basically, we
Staff
Volunteers ple, Migrants or refugees,Other: Single Parent Families
- Massey -
31/07/2016
ese areas?
the the Local Board yourif application successful? is
scretionary Community Funding alth and build positiverelationships between parents and teens. Both single nd role modeling a brightfuture. Both parents and children become -
so
incea teenagerwith hersingle mother. - distantfuture, we will make out own leagues. Fortunately, oneof our
group. s difference?
Community Community benefits
$ $ $ boards? requested fromother Local How much have you 1250.00 1250.00 1250.00
ng similar projects?
500 Hours
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ole family.ole They will choosea healthy
32 34 34 of total% benefit
Page Page
nts 65
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to funders. If thedifferenceis nottoo much, we will splitit with players, wherepossible. Ifit'slot, a we will look to other How wil $ What the is total amount you are requesting from the Local Board? $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is total cost theof project? NetballIndoor fees Childcare Facilitator fees Consumables Hall Hire Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of e something already in existence. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 1616.00 1.00 4849.00
youl raise the difference between the total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary)
any other organisation for funding your for activity/project?
Activity/projectbudget $ Amountapplied for
$ $ $ $ $ $ Total costof item
67 702.00 702.00 180.00 457.00 86.00 -
Round Two 2014/2015
ofStatus request
ach item is betoo funded thisby $ $ $ $ $ $ grant Amountto be funded by
936.00 234.00 234.00 60.00 152.00
$ Amountreceived
Page Page
66
Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di South Community Development Central Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organ Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website Physical Address Outreach Rehearsal in with Black Grace Dance Company
isation
MA15 CDC15 allocated Year funding Executive Assistant Abby Crowther BusinessAdministrator Alex George in attendance. isQ&A also a regular part of outreach activities. involved in creating and performing work, which hasbeen well received by those performances and demonstrations, which includes an explanation processes of makesa point of engaging incommunities whilst tour,on of tailored workshops that cater to high school and tertiarylevels. Black Grace studio thatare open to the publicand free of charge, as wellconducting as operating schedule. Thecompany c inQ&A communitieslarge and are small regular components of Black Grace's Workshops, open rehearsals, free publicperformances, demonstrations and activities. interested in dance, Providean example ofviable a careerpath through working with young people contemporary dancestyle. Provideamenities, training and education to dancers. Maori & PacificIsland communitiesin contemporary dance.Foster pacific Create work that is accessible to a wide audience. Engageand educateY 1995 Charitabletrust http://www.blackgrace.co.nz Mount Eden Auckland 1024 Akepiro14F Street Ne Mount Eden Auckland 1024 Akepiro14F Street scretionary Community Funding w Zealandw
- - 2027 1035
-
OrganisationInformation The The Black Grace Trust
public par 2014/2015
Funding history Funding Contact details Contact
by way of school community & workshops & outreach $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided Funding value
k/area (tbc)
WR15_2006 Application number
-
Round Two 2014/2015
onducts pre
GraceBlack Outreach Rehearsal Outreach Rehearsal Series GraceBlack Dance Company Funding purpose –
Lopdell Lopdell House, or outdoor -
professional workshops itsat
fering free public
Page Page outh, outh,
67
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Arts,culture and/or heritage, Sports and recreation, Children and/or young people Health, healthmental disability,or Education or training, Community support,Ethnic cultural or association, What the are constituencies insideLopdell House,Titirangi, Te or Uru Gallery, a or suitableoutdoor publicpark or area. Where the is activity taking place? Event Finder,Big Idea and flyer distribution. Rehearsal event; Black GraceNewsletter and social media channels. OurAuckl Waitakere Ranges Local Board bepublicky will acknowledged in all collatorial promoting the Outreach How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is Uru Te (tbc) HouseLopdell (tbc) indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and 15 How many of your organisations paid How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the activity/project? 01/05/2015 Indicative dates for the project/activity? professional venue, professional dancers, and meet and talk during the Q&A. By eliminatingbarriers the of ticket priceand uniqueopportunity to see one NZ'sof leading dancecompanies in action. To engageup close with GraceBlack Dance Company present' a live' rehearsal inpublic a and h What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? theFor delivery of the Outreach Rehearsal What your is project/activity? Outreach Rehearsal inwith BlackGrace DanceCompany What your is project/activity called? Central Community Development 2014/15 Interim Regional Fund Central Community Development Central Community Development West Com South Community Development May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Volunteers
Staff munity Development
-
01/11/2015
the event engagesbroadest the of audiences.
WR15_2006 PA15 CASF_141500082 IRCF14/15 042 MT1_141500083 WTA1_141500064
for your activity/project?
- 2031
staff will be involved in the activity/project? Project activity /Project description
Community Community benefits
$$0.00 Declined $$11, Approved $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided 000.00
activity venue/host activity venue/host
– Hours
Lop
-
Round Two 2014/2015
dell House, or outdoor publicpark/area (tbc)
ighlyaccessible space. Offering a Akepiro14F St, Mt Eden Annual operating expenses 2015 thefor Arts (tbc) Dance Company Outreach Rehearsal with BlackGrace spaceTBC) D Outreach Rehearsal with BlackGrace (tbc) House, or outdoor publicpark/area Grace Dance Company Outreach Rehearsal inwith Black GraceBlack Outreach Rehearsal ance Company
and listings, Local Papers,
- -
at Te Tuhi Centre (Waitemata public
–
Lopdell Page Page
68
numberparents with young children attended. The excellent attendeenumbers and engaging sessions Q&A received Outreach Rehearsa GraceBlack have recognised need afor this activity, through their experience holdingof exceptionally well How have you established there is a need for this activity/project? Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area willfrom benefit your activity/project?What percentage your of activity takewill Arts,culture and heritage What the is main sector that ben May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di GraceBlack will coversuch shortfall by seeking sponsorship from the service providers; technician, How will you raise the differen $ What the is total amount you are requesting from the Local Board? $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is total cost theof project? Admin/Operations fee Venuehire/ permits Car hire & fuel Advertising Marketing& Technicians fee and equipment Choreographersfee Dancers x 10 fee Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby highlysuccessful Outr running workshops with schools to Open Studio Days public.for Last year the Company delivered aseries of GraceBlack are well renowned and experienced in offering similar activities for thecommunity, from What expertise does your organisation have in deli Engagementof the community Survey for participants theon day Social analyticsmedia How will you know if you have made this difference? disability group Rehearsal tofollowing the target groups prior; kindergartens, university/tertiary dancedepartments, To ensurethe opportunity is taken upthe by widest audience,Black Grace will be promoting theOutreach audience. with BlackGrace, one Newof Zealand's leading dance companies. It's intention is ins to It will offer anopportunity to the broadest of Maungakiekie What diff opportunity which Black Graceare committed to offering the to community Waitakereof Local Board area. professional venue, the activityaccessible is and engagesthe broadest audiences.of Itisunique a and rare testified to the enjoyment and benefitto the community. By eliminating t
3400.00 3400.00
erence will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity?
s, local community groups, librariesand community facilities.
each Rehearsals across Auckland.
ls across Auckland last year.each At event diverseaudiences, includinglarge a scretionary Community Funding
ce between the total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary)
efits?
Activity/projectbudget $ $ boards? requested fromother Local How much have you $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total costof item vering similar projects?
3400.00 250.00 200.00 100.00 300.00 350.00 700.00 150
0.00
- -
Tamaki community, to experienceand engage Round Two 2014/2015
he barriers ticketof priceand
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ Amountto be funded by grant 250. 200.00 100.00 300.00 350.00 700.00 1500.00
100 of t % 00
pireand engage it's
otal benefit
Page Page
69
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other organisation for funding your for activity/project? materials equipment, marketing, venue. Aswell asreducenumber of dances available and reduc May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
$ Amountapplied for
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ofStatus request
e promotionale $ Amountreceived
Page Page 70
Physical Address Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di Community Development 2014/15 Interim Regional Fund Central Community Developmen West Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website
t OKI1314_200013 IRCF14/15 061 CDC15 WR15_2007 allocated Year funding Chair TerenceGreenslade FinanceFunding AdrienneHunt sexuality. providessafe a and respectful placeto heal and growfor men diverseof with the other andmen realisethat thesestories resonate with their own. EM powerful aspect of the courseas they can begin to connect deeper a on l their emotions. Many men indicatethat hearing other men's storiesis the most to the heart,a journey thatnew is to many of the men, connecting them with each man. Processes involving allfive senses help t awaymen from the edgein whatever form that edge may manifest itself for Essentially Men chooses to workat the top of the cliff endeavouring to divert focusing on positive expressions improvesituation. the We to aim enhancehealth and wellbeing insociety by statistics and indicators in behaviour, health lifestyle.& Our purposeis to gen growTo culture a of positivemasculinity that effectively mentors upcoming 2003 Charitabletrust http://www.essentiallymen.net Ponsonby Auckland 1021 13 MaidstoneStreet New Zealand Ponsonby Auckland 1021 13 MaidstoneStreet scretionary Community Funding erations of men. Malenessis currently associated with negativemany
Essentially Men Education Trust - The Crucible & Essence of 1037
-
OrganisationInformation
2014/2015
& Administration&
Funding history Funding Contact details Contact
Declined $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided Funding value
WR15_2007 Application number
-
Round Two 2014/2015 of of masculinity for men and male youth.
Men
Essentially Men Men/ Being Real workshops Essentially Men Men/ Being Real CrucibleThe Essence& of Men Funding purpose
he transition from thehead
Page Page
evel
71
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding abuse,rape, suicide,depression, fathers denied access to children, youth offending, drinki The regularlymedia reports about men lost strugglingor society. in our Murder, domestic violence,child How have yo Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board are Community support What the is main sector that benefits? Education or training, Community support What the are constituencies your for activity/project? KarangaCamp, TeHenga Road, Waitakere Where the is activity taking place? and end inour of newsletter.year We will includethe Council logo on supportersour page on our websiteas well as including intheaccounts How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is indicate Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and 0 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the activity/project? 13 How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved 01/05/2015 Indicative dates for the project/activity? really areat the your deepest level. Essence2. of M deeperunderstanding of who weare as men. The 1. Crucible Annual Residential courses held Karanga at Camp What activity purchaseor areWe looking for funding Venuefor hireand facilitator costs What your is project/activity? CrucibleThe Essence& of Men What your is project/activity called? West Community Development Central Community Development Central Community Development Central May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Staff
Volunteers
their role -
u established there is a need for this activity/project? 30/09/2015
- en
of benefitof allto men wanting to enhancetheir effectivefunctioning intheworld. Supports
-
a breathingto space gently close gap between who people 'think' are you and who you
a a willfrom benefit your activity/project?What percentage your of activity takewill
will will fundedbe through this grant? AE1400021 YPF14_100022 ASF14_100064
Project activity /Project description
Community Community benefits
$$1,000.00 Approved $$5,000.00 Approved $$1,000.00 Approved $$0.00
$ $ boards? requested fromother Local How much have you
636 Hours
-
Round Two 2014/2015 in the activity/project?
Programme VenueHire for Weekend Workshop Essentially Men Men/ Being Real Weekend Workshop
100 of total% benefit
Pathways to Manhood
ng, drugs,
Page Page
72
to gaugeto the ongoing effectiveness of courseour with room for suggestions for our futureconsideration. After all coursesour weask men to completea feedback form which evaluates their experiences allowing us How will you know if you have made this differ befully present inrelationship your with loved ones; explore the deepestthemes that defineus as men. Essence group norms; capacity to work with intuition, story and body wisdom; strongeralignment with purpose;your facilitation, leadership, co Crucible develops the ability to lead from a place presenceof with yoursel What difference will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity? they come to terms with their placein society. offers them a placesafe to learn more about encouraged to reach out for help and yet thereare limited avenues supportof for men inNZ society that pornography, boys raised with no father figure May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di unknown at thisstage Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other organisation for funding your for activity/project? rates arewe currently unsure of the exactprice per nightfor the hirevenue as they arepresently reviewing their We will seek funding for otherexpense items as well as budgeted course income meeting the required costs. How will you raise the difference between the total expenditure t and $ What the is total amount you are requesting from the Local Board? $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is total cost theof project? Administration IP Marketing Catering Facilitators Venue Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby their partners and whanau. issuessurrou Thousandsmen. of men of diverse agesand cultural backgrounds have engaged in explorations of core For over 20 years Essentially Men Education Trusthas been developing ways of working effectively with What expertise does your organisatio 2900.00 1345.00 24111.00
. Ihave attached last year's invoices for your information.
helps navigateyou lifetransitions; take responsibility for your life sothatthe world can meet you;
nding their male identity and their ability to connect meaningfully with themselves, other men,
- enquiry and co scretionary Community Funding
n have in delivering similar projects? - Activity/projectbudget creation; clear thinking aboutgroup functioning and evolving $ $ Amountapplied for
who theyand are provide them withtools the they need as
–
ence?
symptoms of inmen need help.of Men are being Total costof item $ $ $ $ $ $ 5200.00 1866.00 786.00 4937.00 8422.00 2900.00
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ofStatus request
he he request?grant (if necessary)
f and others; skills that enhance
Amountto be funded by grant $ $ $ $ $ $
2900.00
$ $ Amountreceived
Page Page
73
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activities Objectives Year Founded A Legal Status Website Physical Address Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Communit Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ffiliation CNSST CNSST Cultural Learning Centre
y Group Funding
- - Social2, Enterprise - - - Social1, Services perannum through: developed to a medium external theFor initial years,3 CNSSToperated atJenny’s homegarage withoutany New Zealand. appropriate services to both Asian settlers new and the communitya as whole in from 1998, offers culturally and linguistically Chinese NewSettlers Services Trust(CNSST), a as promoting Asian culture. society through learning NZ cultureand To enable Asian new settlers to participatein and contribute to NZ multicultural 1998 n/a Charitabletrust http://www.cnsst.org.nz PanmureAuckland 1072 20 Dunlop Lane New Zealand PanmureAuckland 1741 Box PO 14129 Executive Director Jenny Wang Social Ent Bill Guan - - Finance3, and Admin -
CNSSTEducation Institute Social Housing Settlement and educatio Employment and enterpriseservices Social workand counselling services Accounting and Taxation MYOB Training Center Translation Services Chinese New Settlers Services Trust
funding.the Now organization has
erprise -
OrganisationInformation Education Programme
2014/2015
-
New New Lynn
Contact details Contact
-
sizeNGO serving more than 15,000 local Asian migrants
n services WR15_2009 Application number
-
Connecting Kids, connecting families -
Round Two 2014/2015
registered charitable trust
Page Page 74 -
South Community Development North Community Development South Community Developmen Central Community Development Funding type May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di West Community Dev West Community Development West Community Development Scheme Creative Communities Scheme Creative Communities South Community Development West Com West Community Development West Community Development South Community Development munity Development
elopment t 00125 CCS15_2_034 HK15 HM15_2029 WH15_2020 WR15_2009 MA15 PA15 SCF15_2028 MO15 CDC15 allocated Year funding WH15_1007 CWF15_1013 YPF15_1008 scretionary Community Funding - - 2027 - 2026
- - 2022 2050 1044
Funding history Funding Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided Funding value $$1,000.00 Approved $$1,300.00 Approved $$620.00 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00
-
Round Two 2014/2015
CNSSTCultural Learning Centre families Lynn CNSSTCultu education programme(Manurewa) Connecting Kids, Connecting Families education programme(Papakura) Conn Asian Service Seniors Line Otahuhu) education programme(Mangere Connecting Kids, Connecting Families Asian Community Hub Programme Funding purpose families Lynn CNSSTCultural Learning Centre Lynn Branch CNSSTCultural Learning CentreNew Programme West Auckland Youths Holiday Chinese NewSettlers Services Trust Learning and Exhibition Chinese Painting and Calligraphy Learning and Exhibition Chinese Painting and Calligraphy Botany) educatio Connecting Kids, Connecting Families families Lynn CNSSTCultural Learning Centre families Lynn ecting Kids, Connecting Families - - - -
Connecting Kids, connecting Connecting Kids, connecting Connecting Kids, connecting Connecting Kids, connecting
- - - - n programme(Howick and
Education Programme Education Programme Education Programme Education Programme
ral Learning Centre
Page Page - - - -
- New New New New
75
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Regional EventFund Central Community Development North Community Development North Community Development North Community Development North Community Development South Community Development South Community Development South Community Development Sou Community Development South Community Development Central Community Development Central Community Development West Community Development May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board th
WTA1_141500017 HM15_1010 REF14S00007 CASF_141500077 DT15_1012 KP15_1015 HB15_1012 UP15_1009 HK15 MA15 PA15 MO15 OP15 MT1_1 - - - 1007 - 1013 1018 - 1016 1033 41500011
$$0.00 Declined $$2,000.00 Approved $$3,000.00 Approved $$2,500.00 Approved $$2,500.00 Approved $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$2,000.00 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined
-
Round Two 2014/2015 education programme(Papakura) Connecting Kids, Connecting Families Otahuhu) education programme(Mangere Connecting Kids, Connecting Families community (Otara Development intheVietnamese Asian Community Services Coaching and MYOB Training CNSSTEducation families Parnell CNSSTCultural Learning Centre families Lynn CNSSTCultural Learning Centre (Fundraising the for impoverished but "Kiwi's world Parnell Community Centre Programme connecting families Glenfield C Programme connecting families Glenfield CNSSTCultural Learning Centre families Albany CNSSTCultural Learning Centre families Albany CNSSTCultural Learning Centre Botany) education programme(Howick and Connecting Kids, Connecting Families education programme(Manurewa) Connecting Kids, Connecting Families NSSTCultural Learning Centre -
Connectin - - -
- - - - Connecting Kids, connect Connecting Kids, connecting Connecting Kids, connecting
- - Education Programme Education Programme Education Programme Education Programme
Connecting Kids, Connecting Kids,
dream"Charity Concert g Kids, connecting -
- Employment Papatoetoe) - -
Education Education
Page Page
------
- New
ing 76
Scheme Creative Communities Central Community Development Central Community Development May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di Community Dev North Community Development North Community Development Central Community Development North Community Dev West Community Development W Community Development North Community Development Central Community Central Community Development Centra Community Development est
l
Development
elopment elopment HB2014_100031 HM14_100017 WH14_100029 SCF14_100068 AE14_100020 WTM14_100005 MT14_100005 CCS14_100087 WTM14 OR14_100018 CWF14_100032 DT14_100010 KT14_100031 ASF14_100050 scretionary Community Funding -
2018
Approved $$880.00 Approved $$1,000.00 Approved $$5,000.00 Approved $$880.00 Approved $$0.00 Declined Approved $$200.00 Approved $$500.00 Approved $$11,875.00 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$1,529.20 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$500.00
-
Round Two 2014/2015
CNSSTCultural Learning Centre Supplies Parnell Branch Artsand Crafts CNSSTCultural Learning Centre PanmureBranch Chirstmas Celebration 2013 at CNSSTCultural Learning Centre Learning & Exhibition Chinese Painting & Calligraphy 2013 Parnell Branch Christmas Celebration CNSSTCultural Learning Centre 2013 Parnell Branch Chirstmas Celebration CNSSTCultural Learning Centre talented kiwi youths' trip to China) CNSSTCultural Learning CentreNew Celebration 2013 Glenfield Branch Chirstmas CNSSTCultural Learning Centre Celebration 2013 Glenfield Branch Chirstmas CNSSTCultural Learning Centre Parnell Jubilee Building,545 Parnell Road, 2013 Albany Branch Christmas Celebration CNSSTCultural Learning Centre 2013 Lynn Branch Christmas Celebration CNSSTCultural Learning CentreNew 2013 Lynn Branch Christmas Celebration CNSSTCultural Learning CentreNew Asian Service Seniors Line Branch and PanmureBranch Chirstmas Celebration 2013 at Parnell
Page Page 77
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Auckland3. Council will be officially acknowledged in CNSSTAnnual Reportb Accounts Auckland2. Council WaitakereRanges Local Board willlisted be separately inCNSST Annual Audited logo The 1. Aucklandof Council willpublished be anyon promotion. How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is West Auckland ChineseAssociation New Lynn Community Centre indicate their role Will any 6 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the activity/project? 5 How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the activity/project? 01/07/2015 Indicative dates for th that holds our community together. createglue the For2. theirfamilies: To socialise together, to meet newpeople, makefriends, connections and participate residence. For1. children/youths: Arts, Culture, Lang - Connecting Kids, connecting families What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? Funding supportfor venue, tutors, promot What your is project/activity? CNSSTCultural Learning Centre What your is project/activity called? South Community Development North Community Development West Community Development South Community Development South Community Development West May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Target: Children/youths aged to15 5 And; their families Staff Volunteers
other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and
-
31/12/2015
e project/activity?
PPK14_100012 SIF14_100020 SGFY14_100010 YPF14_100019 OP14_100013
-
NewLynn
-
Education Programme Project activity /Project description
uagesand Mathematics: to train bi
ion, resourcesand equipment.
-
Connecting Kids, connecting families $$13,400.00 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$2,000.00 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$1,000.00
10 Hours
-
Round Two 2014/2015
Auckland (Ho development in east and south Asian community services English Grammar/Writing Youths Learning Group Pro West Auckland Youths Holiday Chinese NewSettlers Services Trust Celebration 2013 (Otara Manukau Branch Christmas CNSSTCultural Learning Centre Celebration (Papakura) Manukau Branch Christmas CNSSTCultural Learning Centre Lynn Branch
gramme - y y theChairman's Report
lingual talents in local
-
Education Programme
wick)
- -
Maths and Papatoetoe)
Page Page
78
Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area willfrom benefit your activity/project?What percentage your of activity takewill Children and/or young people What the is main sector that benefits? heritage,and/or Children and/or young people, Residentsassociat Migrants refugees,or Education training,or Community support,Ethnic or cultural association, Arts, culture What the are constituencies your for activity/project? New Lynn Community Centre(4 Where the is activity taking place? Branch to acknowledgethe support. Ifthe4. signages bannersor Auckland of Councilprovided, is we will displayit in our Branches atNew Lynn May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di Administration Professional Development & Project Coordination Tutors $30 x 100 hrs Venue$301.3 x 10 times Volunteers Cost $20 x 10 times Expenditure item gra Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby well as education children and youths. experiencein CNSSThas beenrunning cultural learning centres throughoutAuckland for 16 years. We have good What expertise does your organisation have in delivering similar projects? - Board. feedbacks wouldreported be through theaccountability report for the - How will you know if you have made this difference? Enhancement5. oflocal the community cohesion through connecting the Improvement4. of the local children's wellbeing through fun, happiness,upskills childrenof and youths. requires active participation. Enhancement3. of communication in the local commun More2. participation insocial andactivity art instead socialof isolation. Support1. the peopolegrowth inthe local communityproviding by moreeducational oppotunities. What difference will the activity/projectmak with newchildren and familiesin the local area, building theirengagement and social, cultual cohesion. community need for services.our newThe programme,Connecting Kids, Connecting Families will connect youths) and their families attendwho servicesour at these two branches on a weekly basis. This justifies th servicesfor local community havebeen developing continually. We now have134 attendees (children or CNSSTCultural Learning CentreWest Auckland Branch h How have you established there is a need for this activity/project? Whau Henderson Waitakere Ranges
Over 80% Satisfaction Rate A quantitativesurvey will beconducted among the event participantsby 50 questionnaires. And the nt?
- Massey
delivering community
Supervision
scretionary Community Funding
5 5 Totara Ave,New Lynn)
-
based educational programme,supporting thecommunity membersas
Activity/projectbudget Community Community benefits e to the targetcommunity? $ $ $ boards? re How much have you $ $ $ $ $ $ Total costof item 3600.00 3600.00 1800.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 3000.00 3013.00 200.00 quested fromother Local
ity throughity joining the interactive event that as been established for around 10 years. Our
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ion
WaitakereRanges Community Local
parents and families together.
$ $ $ $ $ $ Amountto be funded by grant
1000.00 600.00 200.00
40 40 20 of total% benefit
Page Page
79
e
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Henderson Massey Local Board Whau LocalBoard Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other Participants' Contribution fundraisingOther How will you raise the difference between the total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary) $ What the is t $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is total cost theof project? Promotion May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 1800.00 1013.00 10213.00
otal amount you are requesting from the Local Board?
organisation for funding your for activity/project? $ $ $ Amountapplied for
3600.00 3600.00 $
1000.00 -
Round Two 2014/2015
Proposed Proposed ofStatus request
$
$ $ $ Amountreceived
Page Page
80
Physical Address Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website
WR15_2010 allocated Year funding CEO ElaineDyer Projects & AmosLyn violence. JadeSpeaks Up DVD enduring alternativesto bullying. Bully Banishing project transitioning to school. families not participating in early childhood education the tools they need for interact with families with ‘under 5’s’. Toddler Day Out family service agencies opportunity to interact with thecommunity. WestieDads family service agencies. Promoting Great Parenting Network neighbourhood. Our Amazing Place internationally. succ other effectivealternatives to violence.We then promote the useof our produce model projects which successfully create community resilienceand term social change through violence prevention, particularlyfor children. We Violence Free Waitakereworks proactively and collabo 1998 Incorporated society http://www.violencefreewaitakere.org Henderson Auckland 0650 Henderson7a Valley Road Ne Henderson Auckland 0650 Box PO 21920 Transition to school programme scretionary Community Funding w Zealandw
essful model projectsin other communities, locally, nationally and
Project Adm
Violence Free Waitakere Finance Manager
-
OrganisationInformation
- 2014/2015
photographic exhibition of positive fathering images
-
Funding history Funding Contact details Contact a day of familyfree fun, and for early childhood services -
Undecided Funding value connecting people,places, services,within theirlocal
–
inistrative Support helping NZ children to develop safety strategies around -
i n a local, high
WR15_2010 Application number
-
Round Two 2014/2015
–
inlocal, a high -
a forum for 100
-
needs community, creating positiveand
Project AdministrativeSupport Funding purpose
- needs community, giving
- plus Waitakere ratively to producelong
-
providing
- based Page Page
to 81
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Community support What the is main sector that benefits? Migrants refugeesor Education or training, Community support, Health, mental health disability, or Children and/or young people, What the are constituencies y for All suburbs Waitakere, of Whau, Henderson Where the is activity taking place? Auckland Council logos willdisplayed be all on printed promotional material, and ouron websites. How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successfu is indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and 4 How many of your organisations paid 400 How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the activity/project? 01/07/2015 Indicative dates for the project/activity? effective model projects thatbuil needs are consistently met so canwe invest timeour indevelopment the and implementation of our implementation, and assessment of their effectiveness. Fundingrequested is to ensure operationalour All of projectsour (as described above) require robust administrative support to ens What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? prevent bullying. Day, Our Amaz Parenting Network meetings, Westie Dads social media campaign, development of newour Whanau Family the following projects:Jade Speaks UpDVD training modules, Toddler Day Out evaluation, Promoting Great Administrative support,including for costs marketing, officeand rent ov What your is project/activity? Project AdministrativeSupport What your is project/activity called? West Community Development Fund Local Events Support Fund Local E Fund Local Events Support West Community Development West Community Development West May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Staff
Volunteers
vents Support -
30/06/2016
ing Placein new neighbourhoods, ongoing collaboration work in our neighbourhood local to
HM15_2028 W HM14_2070 LESF00163 LESF00197 LESF00199 H15_2023
d community resilienceand wellbeing. our activity/project?
staff will be involved in the activity/project? Project activity /Project description
Community Community benefits - Massey are reached $$0.00 Approved $$15,000.00 Approved $$2,500.00 Approved $$5,000.00 Approved $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00
1800 Hours
-
Round Two 2014/2015
under5. narrative oflives the of children Massey EastCommunity Weaving Fair (TDO) Toddler Day Out Great& Parenting Toddler Day Out Fair (TDO) Toddler Day Out Great& Parenting Project AdministrativeSupport Project AdministrativeSupport
erheads, evaluation, IT support, for l?
uretheir successful
Page Page
82 –
a
informativeand transformative for families attend;who agencies who participate inWestie Dads inAction collaborativeprojects are relevant,effective and needed.Toddler Day Out attractsin excess of 10,000 and is events is very high in community,our and thefeedback and evaluati haveWe worked within Waitakerefor over 16 years now. Our reputation as coordinators of collaborative How have you established there is a need for this activity/project? Henderson Whau Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area willfrom benefit you May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di $ How m $ What the is total cost theof project? Rent IT Support Communication Costs Electricity Expendi grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby community. Waipareira; and Board member,Samuel Cho, ofAsian the Network, linksus with the new migrant with Fono and Pacific services of Plunket; Maori/Nuiean social worker, Togia Lanefalefrom ma Children, Youth DevelopmentStrategy guidelines. Our cross cultural relationshipskey: are working closely having been replicated in other communities. ar We Our high reputationbecause is we havedelivered many very successful projects over the last16 years, often What expertise does your organisation have in delivering similar projects? documentation for evidence ascertain long term impact.Qualitative datais fedbackto communitiesinvolved. See supporting feedbackfrom agencies we collaborate with. Wefollow up one includesalso datacollection from ‘prizedraw feedback’ forms from particip methods for projectgoal evaluateWe all of projectsour How will you know if you have made this difference? violence. report enjoyment, greater community connection, improved parenting skills 10,000 children nationally this year; Toddler Da reachlikely more than 1,000 people ateach event; JadeSpeaks Up DVD distribution likely will reach up to engagew projectscontribute to this positivetrend, because theirof reach. wide Thebully Violence and crimerates reduced have in WestAuckland, going againstthe national trend. We believe our What difference will the activity/projectma newfor Our Amazing Place; preventing bullying requireslong term commitment creatingto social change. tells 3100.00 131761.00
us itis a worthwhile platform for them; thereis ongoing interestand requestfor support and mentoring
uch your of fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? ture item
ith 500 more local people this year; several Our Amazing Place iterations planned for this year will
- Masse
y
- setting, and to measure expected outcomes againstthese goals. Our methodology
of effectiveness. scretionary Community Funding
to meet objectives, and addressareas for improvement. useWe evaluation
Activity/projectbudget r activity/project?What percentage your of activity takewill ke to the targetcommunity?
ylikely Out to attractat least 13,000 people.Evaluations $ $ $ boards? requested fromother Local How much have you $ $ $ $ $ Total costof item
5000.00 5000.00 5000.00 15323.00 1200.00 3720.00 1560.00 e guidedresearch by includingfor Centre Research on
-
Round Two 2014/2015
- to - one several months afteran event to
ons weons receive, tell us that our
ating public,and evaluation
–
all factors in reducing $ $ $ $ $ Amountto be funded by grant - banishing project will likely
3100.00 300.00 1100.00 500.00
34 33 33 of total% benefit
n Alive; Page Page
83
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding TrustsThe Community Foundation ASB Community Trust Whau Henderson Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other organisation for funding your for activity/project? ideas. Currently applying for other grantand project funding, seeking sponsorship for projects, other fundraising How will you raise the difference between the total expenditure theand requesgrant $ What the is total amount you are requesting from the Local Board? May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 5000.00
- Massey
$ $ $ $ Amountappl 20000.00 60000.00 5000.00 5000.00
ied for -
Round Two 2014/2015
Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ofStatus request
t? (if necessary) $ $ $ $ Amountreceived
Page Page
84
Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di Indicative dates for the project/activity? recreation Providing 'Play now' activtiesin local parks and green spaces to activatearea the and promotephysical What activity pur or Coordination and facilitation the of project as well as equipment costs What your is project/activity? Now Play What your is project/activity called? West Community Devel West Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activitie Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website Physical Addre
s
ss
opment chase will fundedbe through this grant?
WH15_2029 allocated Year funding WR15_2014 Chief Executive Lynette Adams Waitakere RangesCommunity Broker Debbie Keymer makingdifference a in sportand recreation". successful sporting region". Our Purposeto is "Lead, Enable and Strengthen, "Through lead our vision and identified priority areas, theseare explained below. Our Visionthat is training, and programmedelivery in region.our Our servicesare driven by our WaitakereSport provides a number servicesof including advice, advocacy, lead,To enable and strengthen sport and recreation in the Waitakereregion 1991 Charitabletrust http://www.sportwaitakere.co.nz/ Henderson Auckland 0650 65 New Zealand Henderson Auckland 0650 Central Park Drive Box PO 21 scretionary Community Funding
- 67 Central67 Park Drive
- Project activity /Project description 241 -
OrganisationInformation
2014/2015
-
Sport Waitakere Di Funding history Funding
Contact details Contact xon ership, Waitakereis anincreasinglyactive community and Play Now $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided Funding value
WR15_2014 A pplication number -
Round Two 2014/2015
Now Play Now Play Funding purpose
Page Page
85
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is total cost theof project? Facilitator costs Equipment Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby well as high our profilein thecommunity proves we have the skills to deliver this project. WaitakereSport has been delivering eventsacross theWaitakere region sinceits inception in1991. This as What expertise does your organisation have in delivering similar projects? We will survey attendees and a keep trackof numbers a on weekly basis How will you know if you have made this difference? playand sportto keep them busy. providing equipment ina set spacefor them within walking distance of the villagewe will encouragefree Glen Eden istransport a hub and sch after What difference will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity? activities. By having similar events close to the village low/zeroat cost hopewe to have more youth attend. House. Theyouth who attended askedfor more opportunitiesto particip haveWe recently been taking partin Activities inPark in Prospect Parkin collaboration with the Community How have you established there is a need for this activity/project? Whau Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area will Children and/or young people What the is main sector that benefits? andSports recreation, Children and/or young people, Residents association What the are constituencies your for activity/project? Green spaceclos Where the is activity taking place? AucklandThe Council logo will be alladvertisingon material How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Pl 1 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the activity/project? 2 How many your of organisatio 18/05/2015 May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Staff Volunteers 1.00 4320.00
-
18/05/2016
e to Glen Eden town centre
benefitfrom your activity/project?What percentage your of activity takewill
n volunteersn will be involved in the activity/project?
Activity/projectbudget ool local youth often spend time inthe GlenEden village. By Community Community benefits
requested fromother Local How much have you $ $ $ Total cost $ $ $ boards?
3120.00 1300.00 4320.00 4320.00
20 Hours
-
Round Two 2014/2015 of item
ate infun/social recreation
$ $ $ Amountto be funded by grant
3120.00 1200.00
ease list them and % of total% benefit 10 90
Page Page
86
Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other organisation for funding How will you raise the difference between the total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary) $ What the is total amount you are requesting from the Local Board? May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di 1320.00
scretionary Community Funding
$ Amountapplied for
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ofStatus request
for your activity/project?
$ Amountreceived
Page Page
87
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Community Development West Community Development West Community Development West Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website Physical Address Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Co Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board mmunity Development West, WaitakereRanges
Air Air Conditioning Installation as part upgradeof theof main church building
YPF15_1031 FWF15_001 ACC15_1005 WR15_2016 allocated Year funding Judy Attwood Admin Assistant and Fu Rebecca Baird time youth leaderto run programs that support youth in community. our services with a children's program inour 10:10 service. We also employ a full Conversational Language café group. On Sunday's we provide seve Parenting PlaceToolbox courses,and immigrantsare invited to Englishour playtimefor local Mums and tots, Parenting help is provided through The actions session),a weekly C hostwe a fortnightly Seniors supportgroup, Mainly Music pre (a emotional, intellectual and spiritual needs of localour community. In theweek Glen empowerpeople to make healthychoices for their lives. buildings various for social and religious services that benefit thecommunity and this mission through Churchour and Trust our by using campus our and years. Our vision is "Transformed lives,health areWe a community focused church that hasbeen partof GlenEden for 56 1959 BaptistUnion of New Zealand Other: Church http://www.GEBC.org.nz Glen Eden Auckland 06 97 Glendale Road New Zealand Glen Eden Auckland 0641 Box PO 20406 Administrator
Eden BaptistChurch providesnumber a programsof to meetsocial, the
Glen Eden Baptist Church
-
OrganisationInformation
2014/2015
Funding history Funding Contact details Contact Approved $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided $$0.00 Undecided Funding value 41 nding Coordinator
offeegroup providing baking, friendship and WR15_2016 Application number
-
Round Two 2014/2015
TRAX 2015 upgrade Air Conditioning Installationpart as of Funding purpose
y communities"and weexpress
of theof main church building
- school music ral church Page Page
88
open windowsopen and floorfans andsafely heat and efficiently in the winter. years, sowe want to replacethem with anair Many of the heaters inour largeauditorium and smallerCreche care room have stopped working after many What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? conditioning unit and installation. entireThe Creche air conditioning unit with ins What your is project/activity? Air Conditioning Installationpart as upgradeof theof main church building What your is project/activity called? Fund Local Events Support West May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di auditoriumThe and crecheused are for church services,y What difference will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity? better, safer conditions. putfl auditoriumThe has windowsnear the ceiling which, when open, help to itcool insummer the and alsowe difficultwas to make itsafe for the babies and toddlersnear to be to. inthecold crèche and auditorium in haveWe established that moreand more of our wall heaters are ceasing to workwhich meansit that is very How have you established there is a need for this activity/project? Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area willfrom benefit your activity/project?What percentage your of activity takewill Community support What the is main sector that ben young people Religious ministry, Education or training, Community support,Arts, culture and/or heritage,Children and/or What the are constituencies your for activity/project? Glen Eden Ba Where the is activity taking place? We may also label each heatpump to itsay was funded by Waitakere Rangeslocal board. contribut We will announce the resultof funding applications in Sundayour services and acknowledgethe council's How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inth 3 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the activity/project? 2 How ma 04/05/2015 Indicative dates for the project/activity?
Staff Volunteers
oor fans aton times. believeWe that air
ny your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the activity/project? ion inthe Financial section of Annualour Reportthat is printed and given toour church members. -
ptistChurch at97 GlendaleRoad, Glen Eden
30/06/2015
LESF00147 scretionary Community Funding
efits?
the winter. Last winter hadwe a portableheater in the crèche, butit
Project activity /Project description
Community Community benefits - - conditioning would be moreeconomical to run and provide conditioning unit ineachroom which can cool betterthan tallation and partof the cost theof auditorium air $$500.00 Appro $$2,500.00 $ $ boards? requested fromother Local How much have you
5000.00
ved
10 Hours
outh programs,outh weddings, funerals, pre
-
Round Two 2014/2015 e activity/project? Please list them and
LightParty
100 of total% bene
- fit school Page Page
89
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding Southern Trust TrustsThe Community Foundation Lottery Community (regional) Sargood ASB Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to any other organisation fo this airconditioning project. We will apply to various otherfunders, however Auckland Councilarefirst the funder we have applied to for How will you raise the difference between the $ What the is total amount you are requesting from the Local Board? $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is tot Auditorium Air Con Crèche Room Air Con Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised In 2012 a Heat Pump addedwas inYouth the Zone Rooms. the Glendale Road campus were approved by resource consent, these include various VisionWestbuildings. toiletswere upgraded and extra offices were added to the main a separatebuilding in1982. An application for an additional two offices was approved in 1991. In 1995 the churchThe gained co What expertise does your organisation have in delivering similar projects? warm inhere"in the winter, instead seeingof people getting too hot and too cold. receive feedbackverbal of comments We may see morepeople usingfacilities the once they are comfortable,more butmostly wewill expect to How will you know if you have made this difference? parties. the communitymany groupsuse that from it, Mainly adults who alsoit use for seminars and discussion groups.auditorium The would bemore comfortablefor u air programs, community organisation meetings, and seminars.auditorium Ifthe and crèche wereable to have May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board tilise thesetilise rooms. The crèche would be safer andpleasant more for babies, toddlers, mothersand the 21850.00 5000.00 1.00 - conditioning it would bea highermuch grade environment for all the community people and groups who
al cost theof project?
nsent constructionfor of the main auditorium in1975 and a kindergarten addedwas as costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby
such as: is "It niceand cool inhere"(in the summer) and "itnice is and Activity/projectbudget $ $ $ $ Amountapplied for $
total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary) $ $ Total costof item $
18700.00 3150.00
Music, to elderly Home HealthcareClient Christmas
r funding your for activity/project?
-
Round Two 2014/2015
building. Several buildingsother situated on Pr Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed ofStatus request
oposed
$ $ Amountto be funded by grant $
1850.00 3150.00
$ $ $ $ $ Amountreceived
Page Page
90
Physical Address Postal Address Round 2 Local Board Community Group Funding Community Development West, WaitakereRanges Local Board applied to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di West Community Development West Community Develop West Community Development West Community Development West Community Development Funding type Primary office holder Primary contact Umbrella organisation Activities Objectives Year Founded Affiliation Legal Status Website
ment Kiribati Education and Training Information Expo 2014
Pasifika Migrant Services Charitable Trust WR15_2018 allocated Year funding CWF14_100016 HM14_100013 WH14_100014 WTK14_100006 Director JanetDr O'Connor Director CharlesEnoka part of this application. Referto the Strategic Plan document attached. listThe of output activities are attached as supplementary documents to form development theof country. independentlyand contribute positi island countries becomesuccessful lawful residents of New Zealand, live schemes/programmes) to New Zealand from Kiribati, Tuvalu and other Pacific All new migrants (underthe Pacific Access Category and other 2012 N/A Charitabletrust Ranui, Waitakere Auckland 0612 34e Ranui Station Road New Zealand Ranui, Waitakere Auckland 0612 POBox 70023 scretionary Community Funding
-
OrganisationInformation
2014/2015
Funding history Funding C
ontact details ontact $$2,500.00 Approved $$1,000.00 Approved $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Declined $$0.00 Undecided Funding value
W Application number
R15_2018
-
Round Two 2014/2015
vely to the socioeconomic and health
Refineand finalise guidelines Management Pacific MigrantServices and Management Pacific MigrantServices and Management Pacific MigrantServices and Information Expo 2014 Kiribati Edu Funding purpose
cation and Training
Page Page
91
Attachment A Item 16 Attachment A Item 16 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community Discretionary Funding What difference will the activity/projectmake to the targetcommunity? through otheragencies. - fro the only body in New Zealandcan that effectively respondissues to the that the minority migrantgroups - - in NZare which the priority activitiesin this PMS project - How have you established there is a need f Waitakere Ranges Local board benefiting place in each of these areas? What local board area willfrom benefit your activi What the is main sector that benefits? Community support,Children and/or young people, Migrants refugeesor What the are constituencies your for activity/project? Waitakere Rangesarea Where the is activity ta theover Kiribati language program radio. Council logo will beput ontowebsite, or printed materials and posterand funder also will be acknowledged fundThe from Auckland Council will be treated How will you acknowledge the Local Board yourif application successful? is New Zealand Police Career New Zealand UNITEC,Auckland indicate their role Will any other organisations be collaborating youwith inthe activity/project? Please list them and 0 How many of your organisations paid staff will be involved in the activity/project? 8 How many your of organisation volunteers will be involved in the act 01/08/2015 Indicative dates for the project/activity? Institutions and Industry Training Organization (ITO). learn more about the education and traini from ethnic migrant groups residing within the Waitakereranges area. The expo give will the opportunity to areWe planning anEducation and Training Expo involving parents, students, youth, teachers and community What activity purchaseor will fundedbe through this grant? expenses. seekWe funding to cater thefull costs of operating a day one Expo towards administration and operating What your is project/activity? Kiribati What your is project/activity called? May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board PMS PMS will providepersonalised a and culturally appropriate guidanceservices whichnot are readily available Studies identified gaps to better socioeconomic and health outcomesin theKiribati and Tuvalu communities
Given its membership exclusively of I PMS priority activitiesare aligned toHenderson Staff Volunteers m Kiribati and Tuvalu face.
Education and Training Information Expo 2014
-
30/08/2015
king place?
- Project activity /Project description
Kiribati and Tuvaluans only, the Pasifika Migration Services Trust is
ng from EarlyChildhood Education (ECE),to different Tertiary Community Community benefits or or this activity/project?
as separate entry financial inour statements. The Auckland -
Massey $ $ boards? requested fromother Local How much have you ty/project?What percentage your of activity takewill
Provideinformation, etc Provideinformation, etc Provideinformation, etc 48 Hours
Local Board and Auckland Council -
Round Two 2014/2015
ivity/project?
100 of total% benefit
Page Page
92
What expertise does your organisation have in del achieved. regularlyat each milestone performancewill be assessed based whetheron notor indicators havebeen haveWe ide How will you know if you have made this difference? ------projectThe will May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Di Nameof funder Have you (or will you) apply to a We will sourcefundraising activity from the community How will you raise the difference between the total expenditure theand request?grant (if necessary) $ What the is to $ How much yourof fundsown youris organisation contributing to the project/activity? $ What the is total cost theof project? Others Resource Program Venue Expenditure item grant? Please provide itemised costs the of project and show how much of each item is betoo funded thisby haveWe advocacy a Human Resource management and Community Development and Outreach programme management. publichealth, Our Trust comprises of expertise infinance the and accounting area, project development and management,
empowerthem to integrate and become good community members accesshave to social supportservices become independent and good residents find learn and passNZ minimum English standard sothey can compete in the NZjob market identifysuitable jobs obtain legal residency status within thefirst 6 months arrival of in New Zealand 3430.00 500.00 3930.00 suitablehousing and community to live in
ntified indicators for the major activitiesin project. our Theseindicators will bereviewed
tal amount you are requesting from the Local Board?
help Kiribati and Tuvalu migrants and others:
bility and networking support scretionary Community Funding ny otherny organisation for funding your for activity/project?
Activity/projectbudget $ Amountapplied for
$ Total costof item $ $ $ $ ivering similar projects?
480.00 1850.00 600.00 1000.00
-
Round Two 2014/2015
ofStatus request
$ Amountto be funded by grant $ $ $ $
480.00 1850.00 600.00 1000.00
$ Amountreceived
Page Page
93
Attachment A Item 16
1. Purpose FileNo.: improve quality water thein coast west lagoons Public awareness projectand septic tankupgrade subsidy scheme to May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board lagoons westcoast awareness tankPublic project and upgradeseptic subsidy to scheme water improve quality the in a) That the Recommendations 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. ExecutiveSummary
a two over initiatives two approve board the financialyears. Theseare: recommended is it aspiration this achieve To lagoons coast as aspirationan in their2014Local Board Plan. Ran Waitakere The maintained poorlysepticsystems. including identified, been have lagoons the of contamination of sources of number a project this of part As lagoons. coast west the in quality water improve to plan a at working is Council Auckland issue this address To forresidents and visitors whoswim often in thelagoons. problem a is contamination. This faecal to dueswimming for unsafe test often are (Bethells) Auck of coast west the on lagoons The Toseekapproval and budget allocation from thelocal board for: aeae Ph, ot Ph ad e eg lgos o aae th manage to home lagoons Henga effectively. for Te and need Piha the North Piha, of Karekare, awareness raise to year financial 2014/2015 the in delivered be to project a to $5,000 of budget a Allocates or functioning poorly of number the reduce qualityoutcomes, and are therefore recommended board for approval. to potential have catchment the intanks septic maintained projects these of Both b) )
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
CP2015/03329
$2,500 from board the tohelp pay costfor the of upgradingtheir septic tank system. the in livingowners home allowwouldscheme of 2015/2016.This deliveredin be to $50,000 budget total a with scheme Subsidy Upgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast West A worth inspection tank septic free $150 a offered be also would Residents lagoons. the of the catchments the residents livingin visits to door involving to place, currently theirdoor taking in manage to delivered Henga) Te be and t Piha to septic (Karekare, lagoons $5,000 coast west of the of cost vicinity total a the in livinghomeowners for need withthe of awareness raise to year, financial 2014/2015 project, awareness public A scheme Subsidy Upgrade Tank withbudget a of $50,000 to deliveredbe in 2015/2016 Septic financial year. Lagoons Coast West new a of development 2014/2015 financialyear $5,0 of budget a with lagoons coast west the of vicinity the in management tank septic improved for need the of awareness public raise to project a
omnte o Krkr, ia and Piha Karekare, of communities
(funded bythe local asboard part ofthe project). ns fetvl. hs ol epn te cp o a einl rjc ta is that project regional a of scope the expand would This effectively. anks
west the in quality water improving identified also has Board Local ges
ad tKrkr, ia Nrh ia n T Henga Te and Piha North Piha, Karekare, at land
of the lagoons, thus contributing to improvedcontributingwaterlagoons, thus to the of
e Henga Te - owners living in the vicinity of of vicinity the in living owners
regional level to develop an action an develop to level regional
to apply for a subsidy of up to to up of subsidy a for apply to
00 to be delivered in the the in delivered be to 00 i spi tanks septic eir
Page Page
95
Item 17 Item 17 lagoons westcoast awareness tankPublic project and upgradeseptic subsidy to scheme i 15. 14. Public awareness 13. 12. 11. 10 9. 8. 7. Comments d) c) b) May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
.
how best to manage their septic system. They also ask home owners if they would like a like would they if owners home ask also They system. septic their manage to best how about material educational with homeowners provide and house each visit staff EcoMatters Aprilto 2015. Februar late from lagoonsHenga Te andPiha North Piha, Karekare, the of catchments the in houses 100 targeting exercise knocking door a in engage to EcoMatters contracted has of part As described in moredetail below. are projects These year. financial 2015/2016 the in scheme Subsidy Upgrade Tank Septic an 2015 June to May from out carried be to project awarenesspublic A board: the to proposed are projects two goals, these achieve To t schemeto encourage septic tankowners upgradeto theirwastewater around disposal systems. education and engagement public for used be budget this that requested board the 2015 February 12 on staff council with workshop a In for year per $50,000 committed has financialyears (from 2015/16 2017/18)to in their board localdraft board budget for project.this the outcome this achieve To lagoons, coast by working with localcommunities’ as a priority in theirLocal Board Plan. west the in quality water ‘improving identified also has Board Local Ranges Waitakere The pollution. of sources of number a on focus will and enforcement,wide to incentivesa from includeactions, of will range plan The lagoons. Henga Te and Piha North Piha, Karekare, at quality Auckla level regional a At assuch improving their septic system. comprehensive A action, affirmative take to people for incentives causing. alongside required, is are programme education they that contamination the reduce visitors and residents critica is it tourism, local affecting avoid to and swimming for safe lagoons the make To birdsdogs, and livestock. swim systems, septic to performing poorly including sources, of children range a from comes contamination for places safe in swim to perceivedas are safe they because not concern particular often of are is This Henga contamination. faecal Te of because and Piha North Piha, Karekare, at lagoons The subsidya on f with understanding the thatall home Council Auckland Services, Environmental of Manager the to scheme subsidy decision Delegates are households which exactly clarify to boundaries eligible. catchment of map a include catchment of lagoons the eligibleguidebethissubsidy receive shouldthe that to and Applica for Guide SubsidyUpgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast West draft the revise staff That a subsidyup of to $2,500 1 Julyfrom 2015onwards. HengaTe (Bethells) Lagoons and wishing to upgrade theirseptic tank could applyfor Karekar the of catchments the in living owner home eligible any that meaning year, financial 2015/2016 the in delivered be to $50,000 of budget total a with Subsidy’Upgradescheme Tank Septic CoastLagoons ‘West a Approves
the regional project to improve water quality described above, Auckland Council Auckland above, described quality water improve to project regional the nts and eligibility criteria to specify that only residents living within the the within living residents only that specify to criteria eligibility and nts -
raisingproject irst - come, first - aig vr h Ws Cat aon Spi Tn Upgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast West the over making
d oni i dvlpn a ato pa t ipoe h water the improve to plan action an developing is Council nd - servedbasis. –
- budget$5,000, 2014/2015 financialyear ownerswho eligibility meet willcriteria offered the be
n pa. oni rsac sget ta the that suggests research Council play. and
d the introduction of a new a of introduction the d mprove water quality the in
i ise n t cet a subsidy a create to and issue his e, Piha, North Piha and and Piha North Piha, e, West Coast LagoonsCoast West
h nx three next the Page Page l that l
96 y
18. 17. 16. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board lagoons westcoast awareness tankPublic project and upgradeseptic subsidy to scheme water improve quality the in 27. Levelof subsidy 26. 25. Subsidy targeting 24. 23. 22. 21. 20. Upgrade Tank 2015/2016 financialyear Septic Lagoons Coast West 19.
xsig primar existing July 1 from their replacing area of cost the target of part for applicants the reimburse would It in 2016. June 30 livinguntil 2015 applicants all to open be would scheme subsidy The staff council by within existingregional budgets and resources. administered be would and year financial 2015/2016 the for $50,000 subsidy The would fundedby be Local Board Ranges a the to upvalue total for Waitakere of Subsidyscheme. t that recommended is It also It lagoons. coast west TankUpgrade Subsidy scheme, as described the below. tank in septic contamination manage water to a reduces need provides that the way of awareness a public in increase systems to help will project This Abreakdown ofcosts is provided below: ofacost freeseptic tank inspectionhome if potenti the cover also would budget This communities. coastal these in houses 50 further a withmanagement tank septic discuss andscheme the expand to used be to year financial reco is It tank septic free a inspection. of offer the up taken have far so visited 80 approximately the of 30 than more and ownershome from feedbackpositive generally had havestaff EcoMattersdate To costs$150. by funded is This inspection. tank septic independent free, systems may be considerably less than that. The subsidy could range from a relatively low relatively a from range could subsidy The that. than less considerably be may systems on New waterquality in lagoons the andhavingequity across theboard area. improving of goal primary the on focusing between balance a provides This only. Henga Te is recommendedIt that theofferboard subsidy the com the to Waitakere the of all to Henga), RangesLocal Board area. Te and Piha (Karekare, communities local the to houses) geogr different of number and a at offered be could subsidy the targeting, process geographic to respect With application the available, funding of offering is amount accountabilityrequirements. board the requirements, why understand them eligibility help to public the of membersfor AttachmentA) (see prepared been haveapplicants guidelinesfor funding Draft m direct mail other through and undertake to EcoMatters awarenesscontracted the through promoted be would fund The buildingconsent forimprovedan system. aphic scales ranging from the lagoon catchments only (with approximately 600 600 approximately (with only catchments lagoon the from ranging scales aphic inspection):$1,500 inspection tank septic Free
Door knockinghouses: 50 $3,500 Projectadministration and development:Covered through regionalbudgets - site wastewater systems can cost more cost can wastewatersystems site mmended that the Waitakere Ranges Local Board allocate $5,000 in the 2014/2015 the in $5,000 allocateLocalRangesBoard the that mmended Waitakere
-
aeu fr h bad o rmt ter rpsdWs Cat aon Septic Lagoons Coast West proposed their promote to board the for avenue n
outto target properties in lagoons’ the catchments.
tetet etc ak ie od ehooy oc te hd en granted been had they once technology) old (i.e. tank septic treatment y
e or etbih Ws Cat aon Spi Tn Upgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast West a establish board he
asmn a 0 e cn utk ad $5 cs per cost $150 a and uptake cent per 20 a (assuming
- ownersrequested this. usd scheme Subsidy
than $30,000, though new composting toiletnewthough composting $30,000, than
- asn porme ht oni has council that programme raising eans also. This could include a a include could This also. eans
council at a regional level and and level regional a at council munities of Karekare,Piha and
–
ugt p o $50,000, to up budget
h sbiy applicant subsidy, the
Page Page from 97 al
Item 17 Item 17 lagoons westcoast awareness tankPublic project and upgradeseptic subsidy to scheme i 37. 36. Summaryand rationale early for allocation of funding 35. 34. 33. ofImpact theproposed subsidy scheme onthe existing septic tank pump outprogramme 32. 31. Subsidy decisionmaking process 30. 29. Potentialto change scheme criteriain futureto manage demand 28. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
July 2015. This responds to the board’s direction in February 2015 when they asked at a at asked they when 2015workshop forthe scheme tobe made available to thepublic as soonFebruary aspos in direction board’s the to responds This 2015. July 1 of as available be will scheme subsidy in the that ensure project to is this 2015/2016 for budget to overall budget allocating board the for rationale The likely the improvement attributable to thesubsidy via mapping astudy. the to directly lagoons the in quality waterwater in change improve any map significantly to difficult be to will it potential While quality. has it as year financial 2015/2016 the in recom delivered is it summary, In wouldtaken be off thepump out programme andstop paying the targetedrate. hi a to anypropertyprogramme,thatoutthatpump exceptaffect subsidy will the not This system tech or connects Aucklandto the Council wastewater network. hi a to upgrades owner the if programme ratetargeted the from removedbe can Properties by years) three (every regularly visited are councilcontractors haveto septic their tanks pumped outand clea households These systems. sewage rural of on private 4,310 with estimated an are there area, Board Local Ranges Waitakere the Within decisionsmade aon first t to delegated is example, area) Council City Shore being For North schemes. similar scheme other deliver the to legacy the (available in Trees ScheduledNotable for Scheme usedAssistance Financialcouncil’s of process the event with consistent the is This In subsidy. the receive criteria to oversubscribedapplications abovewould considered be aon first the recommended met who be anyone would that understanding the with Services Environmental scheme Subsidy Upgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast decision final the delegate board the that recommended is It b. a. be either: would board the then $50,000) of budget total the of ($45,000 anticipated 90% the than uptake lower having towards tracking was scheme the If departmentto the board. throughout scheme subsidy 2015/2 the of uptake on updates with presented be would board The funded2015/2016. in their upgrading syste of tank applicant septic the to cost the to difference real a make to enough significant midaboardoffer isrecommended the It a higheramount such as $5,000 (me to 2015/2016) in subsidy a receive could people 50 to up (meaning $1,000 as such amount
subsidy, we know that failing septic tanks are a major contributing factor and can infer can and factor contributing major a are tanks septic failing that know we subsidy, qualityin thewest coastlagoons re higher a offering subsidy,widening bythe geographiceligibility criteria orinvesting morein promotion)example, (for uptake encourage to scheme the to changes make
- - 1 i rglr efrac rprs rm nrsrcue n Evrnetl Services Environmental and Infrastructure from reports performance regular in 016 loae ud fo te usd sch subsidy the from funds allocate
tech wastewater system (whether they use the proposed subsidy to do this or not) or this do to subsidy proposed the use they (whether system wastewater tech
- site wastewater treatment systems that pay a targeted rate for maintenance for rate targeted a pay that systems treatment wastewater site m but still allows for a reasonably large number of applications (20) to be to (20) applications of number large reasonably a for allows still but m
-
come first edd ht h bad loae 5,0 t ti poet o be to project this to $50,000 allocate board the that mended
- servedbasis. aningonly people10 could receive a subsidy).
- range subsidy of $2,500. At this level the subsidyis level the this At $2,500. subsidy range of m t a atraie rjc t ipoe water improve to project alternative an to eme
he Manager of Environmental Services with Services Environmental of Manager he
mprove water quality the in
o ukad oni’ Mngr of Manager Council’s Auckland to
- lre t ti s ht hy could they that so this to alerted come first - making authority for the West West the for authority making dac o fnlsn the finalising of advance ned. - servedbasis.
sible.
households
upgrades
Page Page
98 ir -
42. 41. 40. 39. Nextsteps 38. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board lagoons westcoast awareness tankPublic project and upgradeseptic subsidy to scheme water improve quality the in 48. 47. Implementation 46. 45. impact Māori statement 44. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideration 43.
mana whenua in their role as kaitiaki of Auckland’s natural environment. Te Kawerau a Maki a Kawerauenvironment.Auckland’sTe natural of kaitiaki as role their inwhenua mana i that recognised is It board from feedback on based developed membersand give effectto outcomes identified in the RangesWaitakere Local Board Plan. been have local proposals the these for above, initiatives described two forward puts report This regular Services Environmental and Infrastructureupdate reports. through implemented and developed th about updated kept be will members Board home owners forupgrades which could be then paid back througha rates attachment. draft current to facilityassistance financial woulda provide This upgrades. tank includeseptic The to scheme above. mentioned lagoons council’s expand to the proposal a includes in plan action regional quality water with improve synergies to have plan also action will scheme subsidy proposed this forward, Going in 2016/2017 the public financi the to offered and extended be it for potential is there successful is scheme the If a for receivedin Julywould have funding decisionsconfirmed by September 2015 atthe latest. open be begin could could scheme subsidy project The awareness public the proposals, two these immediatelybecause itis extensionan of a regional programme which isalreadyway.under approves board the If 2015as part of the public awareness projectdescribed in the firs June and May in visits knocking door their during EcoMatters by promoted be can scheme subsidy the mean also will year financial 2015/2016 the of advance in budget the Allocating throughthe regional environmental funding andincentives team. resources, council existing within administered be also will scheme subsidy tank septic The deliveringwithin be can thus and underway already project regional a of extension an is project awareness public The projects. these of either with issues implementation no be will there approved If subsidyproposed bythe board. and have recentlydraftendorsed the action plan lagoons, cleanthe upto which includes KawerausteeringMaki the onwestTe represented the are coasta lagoonsgroup for project in part and otheriwi have regularlyexpressed importance the theyplace healthyon waterways and,
icular, need the to preventthembeing contaminated with humanwaste.
existing councilresources. alyear as well.
mproving the health and mauri of waterways is of key importance to importance key of is waterways of mauri and health the mproving
piain fo 1 uy 05 Ay applications Any 2015. July 1 from pplications is, and other, regional initiatives as they are they as initiatives regional other, and is, or t cnie fr prvl As approval. for consider to board successful Retrofit Your Home Your Retrofit successful
thalf of this report.
h regional the
Page Page
this
99
Item 17 Item 17 lagoons westcoast awareness tankPublic project and upgradeseptic subsidy to scheme i Authorisers Authors A No. Attachments May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Signatories
Glenn Boyd John Dragicevich PhilBrown, Landand Advisory Water ManagerTeam Applicants Draft Coast West Lagoons Septic Tan Title
-
Relationship Manager
-
Manager Infrastructureand Environmental Services
k Upgradek SubsidyGuide for mprove water quality the in
Page Page Page 101 100
system. tank septic their upgrading of cost the pay for help an Piha Karekare, of communities the in living owners home allows Subsidy Upgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast The West (Bethells). Henga Te and Piha North Piha, Karekare, at Auckland of coast a toBoard Ranges Local by the Waitakere a non is Subsidy Upgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast The West Background Subsidy Draft TankUpgradeSeptic Lagoons WestCoast May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board lagoons westcoast awareness tankPublic project and upgradeseptic subsid consent. an form prescribed the on be made should Applications place. year areaccepted Applications this subsidy. for already You must 2016. June 30 until 1 2015 July from Henga Te Piha and Karekare, of communities local within the households all to open be will Upgrade subsidy Tank Septic Lagoons Coast The West can youapply? How the for be eligible We To property. per accepted is application one Only subsidy. upgrade off the one for to apply eligible Henga are Te Piha and Karekare, of within communities the system septic tank treatement a with primary All households eligibil Subsidy Upgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast West available. is $2,500 of year asubsidy financial 2015/2016 the For Council. by Auckland system improved an for building consent t primary existing replacing their of the cost partof applicantsfor reimburses Subsidy Upgrade scheme Tank Septic Lagoons Coast The West action. to take residents to encourage programme incentives and education a community developed has Ra the lagoons coast west Waitakere within the improvements water quality support To livestock. and dogs, birds septic systems, performing poorly including a sources, range of from comes contamination The and play. swim to children perceive often are lagoons the because concern particular is of This contamination. in due to to swim safe not often are Henga Te and Piha North Piha, Karekare, lagoonsat The Plan. Board Local in their a as priority with local communities’ working lagoon coast west in the water quality ‘improving identified has Board Local Ranges The Waitakere Objectives requiring you requiring directives council or other notice abatement Council Auckland anwith issued been have not You must rates your property with date to be up You must system. water waste new a to councilinstall from consent received have already You must
Guide for Applicants for Guide
to upgrade your septic tank system tank septic your upgrade to d Te Henga to apply for a subsidy of $2,500 from the Waitakere Ranges Local Board to to Board Local Ranges the Waitakere $2,500from of asubsidy for apply to Henga Te d have received consent from council to install a new waste water system prior to applying prior toapplying system water waste new a to councilinstall from received consent have
st Coast Lagoons Septic Tank Upgrade Subsidy Tank Septic st Lagoons Coast reatment septic tank (i.e. old technology) once they have been granted granted been have they once technology) old (i.e. septic tank reatment
ddress water quality issues identified in the lagoons on the west the on lagoons thein identified quality issues water ddress
- round so you can apply as soon as your consents are in are in your consents as soon as youapply can so round y to scheme water improve quality the in
d be accompanied by a copy of the approved approved the of a copyby accompanied d be
ity criteria ity -
regulatory incentive programme introduced introduced programme incentive regulatory
d as safe places for for places safe d as
nges Local Board Board Local nges
s, by by s, Page Page
101
Attachment A Item 17 Attachment A Item 17 lagoons westcoast awareness tankPublic project and upgradeseptic subsidy to scheme water improve quality the in Email: 4397 09 890 Phone: Parra Sonia information further for Contact the subsidy. to return required theywill be system this of installation o an awarded recipients any subsidy that event In the awarded. was the subsidy after 12 months no than later on that their arerequi recipients Subsidy Upgrade Tank Septic Lagoons Coast West requirements Accountability made. be will payment subsidy the this agreement, of acceptance Upon subsidy. this with associated requirements agreemen an into to enter required willbe applicants Successful applicants Successful available). the scheme for funding more makes board untilyear the or financial next the (to deferred be may applications that possibility thewith a first on considered will be applications oversubscribed being scheme the event of the In Services. Environmental of Manager Council’s byAuckland made will be decisions allocation Subsidy upgrade. septic tank a requiring place in notices there areno and confirm check payment rates a will complete staff council this process of partAs eligibility requirements. that meet they confirm to assessed willbe Applications processed? be applications will How Wai the by contacting or ([email protected]) staff Funding Environmental Council Auckland the contacting by website, Council the Auckland from canbe accessed forms Application M 14 WaitākereRanges Local Board
takere Ranges Local Board office. Board Rangestakere Local ay2015
sonia.parra@aucklandco
- - site wastewater system has been successfully installed and that this installation was completed completed was installation this that and installed successfully been has system wastewater site
Environmental Funding Coordinator Funding Environmental
uncil.govt.nz
n - site wastewater upgrade subsidy do not complete complete not do subsidy upgrade wastewater site
t with Council setting out the accountability accountability the out setting with Council t
red to provide council with evidence with evidence council provide red to
- come f come irst - served basis served basis council council Page Page 102
3. 2. ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpose FileNo.: 2015/2016Budget allocation:Kauridieback co May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board allocation: dieback Budget 2015/2016 co Kauri 9. 8. Background Comments a) That the Recommendations 7. 6. 5. 4.
continuity of work the programme. 2015/2016 in thisproject of out rollsuccessful ensure to 2015/2016is for The rationalethe boardfor toallocate budgetthis in advance of finalising theiroverall budget 2015/2016 financialyear. ap board the that recommended is It events, community attending as such activities engagementwith schoolsand development of an advocacy programme. through awareness public’s general the co dieback kauri The 2014 from plan 2017. the of life the over inflation) for (adjusted annually $45,000 commit co would dieback kauri a employing identified board Waita the in signaled also wascommitment This a year four period. over maintained be should project this that resolved also They year. financial 2014/15 the in communitydieback co kauri fund to 2014, September in resolved, board Ranges Waitakere the issue this address To in kauri of wellbeing the to threat serious Auckland. a constitutes which disease a is dieback Kauri dieback kauri through of the appointment a of dieback kauri awarenessc raise to project a to $47,000 of budget a of allocation seek To isareaan where there isrealpotential fora difference tobe madein containingthe disease. change behaviour create to communities empowering and awareness Raising disease. this take be can steps what and dieback kauri of Managementof kauridieback requires park users, landowners and communities be to aware kauri for cure known no diseaseits in current locations and stopthe With spread intohealthy areas. years. few last fo kauri the the protect to way only over the dieback, region the in trees of thousands Kauriconstitutesdieback a seriousthreat wellbeingto the in of Auckland kauri andhas killed throughthe appointment a of dieback kauri co dieback ‘Kauri the from budget co 2015/2016 biosecurity their of $47,000 of allocation Approve Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
CP2015/06904
- ordinator’ budget line to a project to raise awareness of kauri dieback kauri of awareness raise to project a to line budget ordinator’
- ord inator project has been successful in the 2014/2015 year, raising year, 2014/2015 the in successful been has project inator
- ordinator for the Waitakere Ranges area, for a value of $ valueaof for area, Ranges the Waitakere ordinator for - ordinator project
rv $700 f hi bde t ti poet n the in project this to budget their of $47,000 prove o rests of the Waitakere Ranges is to contain the contain to is Ranges Waitakere the of rests n (hygiene protocols) to prevent the spread of spread the prevent to protocols) (hygiene n - -
ordinatorin 2015/2016 the financialyear. ordinator. - ordinator as a key initiative to which they they which to initiative key a as ordinator kere Ranges Local Board Plan in which the the which in Plan Board Local Ranges kere
- ordinatorproject
with no delays and no with
Page Page 45,450
103 a -
Item 18 Item 18 allocation: dieback Budget 2015/2016 co Kauri 22. Rationa 21. 20. 19. 18. 17. 16. 15. Key responsibilities for the co 14. 13. 12. 11. 10. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
t s eomne ta te or apoe 4,0 o bde t ti poet rm their from project this to budget of $47,000 approve 2015/2016 board financialyear budget. the that recommended is It Producearticles beto placed targeted in local media to raise publicawareness. risk high groups workingwithin targeting RangesareaWaitakere (for example, arborists). programme communications a and materials hygiene of delivery Assist locationsrisk over the summer period. high at users park by use station cleaning Advocate plan. communication dieback kauri the inform to order in users park of levels awareness measure to surveys implement and Lead Leadpublic engagement through communitye ‘off undertaking individuals and WaitakereRanges RegionalPark to reducethe potential for kauridieback spread groups with engagement Support assi and area Ranges Waitakere the within deliverytheeducationof resource. schools all for support and advice Provide engagementaround this project. of reach the and and volunteers of involvement of level engaged the strengthen to capacity fully is there area create to programme individuals. and advocacy groups community empowered volunteer a of development Further board’s the to contributed which year 2014/2015 overallgoal position. for the Theseincluded: the in activities of number a out carried co dieback kauri the Although they what and dieback docan preventto its spread.’ kauri about informed well are visitors and people local that ensure v Their 2014from plan the of life the over to inflation) for (adjusted annually $45,000 commit would they which achieveemployingidentifiedTo board the co dieback akauri this kauridieback.’ f protected are forests kauri ‘Our that aspiration an identified also board the addition In areas.’ marine and streams coasts, forests, our in flourishes biodiversity Native st board the which in Plan Board Local Ranges Waitakere the in signaled also wascommitment This contract.’ ( i issue this address To WTK/2014/138) leapproving for inbudget advance of2015/2016 financialyear rvso o esnil yin sple ad nomto t cnesoars key concessionaires, to information development and supplies hygiene stakeholder groupsand individuals within the Ranges Waitakere area essential of provision (eg.Kauri Carnival, Rakau Rangatira photo exhibition) future inform raise to events specific to of delivery the supporting users track 200 over of communicationstrategies surveys through engagement visitor park RaceDay) Karekare (eg. parks on events permitted and events community at engagement public so ws ht h kui ibc codntr ol ‘ok ih oa cmuiis to communities local with ‘work would coordinator dieback kauri the that was ision
ated a key outcome that ‘Our unique natural environments are healthyrestored:naturaluniqueenvironmentsare and ‘Our that outcome a key ated
- 2017.
o loae ugt o ‘ a to budget allocate to ofa pilot advocacy programme with interestedindividuals - ordinatorin 2015/16will include: Spebr 04 te atkr Rne pse a resolution a passed Ranges Waitakere the 2014, September n
- ordinator was not not was ordinator - ordinator pr
oject ar deak co dieback Kauri
ventsin the RangesWaitakere area.
While some steps have been taken in this in taken been have steps some While employed until January 2015 they have have they 2015 January until employed awareness of kauri and kauri dieback kauri and kauri of awareness
- ordinator
- ordinatorinitiativekey as a -
track’ activity in the the in activity track’ -
$45,450
rom the threat of threat the rom
–
Page Page year 4 104 st
25. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideration 24. 23. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board allocation: dieback Budget 2015/2016 co Kauri Authorisers Authors Signatories There are noattachments for this report. Attachments 27. Imple 26. impact Māori statement
f prvd hs rjc cn e eiee uig xsig oni rsucs o aae the manage to resources council existing kauridieback co using delivered be can project this approved If councilstaff. dieback co dieback kauri kauri regional The the strategy. management on Council Auckland with directly working are and mana programme to importance key of iskaitia as kauri role of their in survival whenua the tree Zealand New native iconic an As the Ranges Waitakere Local Board Plan,as discussed above. coord dieback kauri the for direction their with line in Board Local Ranges Waitakere the for developed project a outlines report This relationships project. of development further group and community with maintenance formed the support will this work particular, the In of continuity and project this of out roll programme. successful ensure to is 2015/2016 for The rationalethe boardfor toallocate budgetthis in advance of mentation
Whau Glenn Boyd John Dragicevich StaceyHill, Senior Reg
-
ordinatorcontract in 2015/2016.
-
Relationship ManagerHenderson
-
Manager Infrastructureand Environmental Services ki. Mana whenua have engaged in the national kauri dieback kauri national the in engaged have whenua Mana ki. ad niiul i te 0421 a pr o ti ongoing this of part as 2014/2015 the in individuals and s - ordinator project ionalBiosecurity Advisor, KauriDieback
inator project. It also delivers on key outcomes of outcomes key on delivers also It project. inator - riao wl spot eiey fti wr by work this of delivery support will ordinator
- Massey, Ranges,Waitakere
finalising theiroverall budget
Page Page 105
Item 18
3. 2. ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpose FileNo.: Reviewof alcohol bans2015 May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of 10. 9. 8. 7. Background c) b) a) That the Recommendations 6. 5. 4.
Makes the alcohol bans contained in AttachmentA in contained bans alcohol the Makes October2015. Followingdecision, the staff will update the registeroflocal alcohol bans to commence31on areas alcoholban area (Attachment A). ban alcohol 11 retain to recommend Staff and organisations. use obtain to to preference a process expressed process board engagement local community the targeted workshops these During 2015. early data police recent and To new the meet newthreshold will lapse 31 on October2015. bans alcohol the meet not local do that bans existingAlcohol retained. be to which them enable to identify threshold statutory higher to is review the of purpose The localin its board areausing a targetedcommunity bans alcohollocal existing 11 review to undertaken has Board Local Ranges Waitakere The Todecide which existingalcohol bans are beto retained after31 October 2015. oa bad ra b 3 Otbr 05 hs os o icue eiw f xsig alcohol existing of review a an include not does This include 2015. October 31 Penalties by areas board local arrest. and seizure, L search, of powers infringement of fee $250. using Police Zealand prohibit bans under made are bans Alcohol high of areas alcohol in retained only are bans alcohol that ensure to intended is new threshold the higher against bans alcohol existing of review a require to legislation to changes Recent harm reduce includinglevels intoxication,of noise, to litter, harm and disor helps This places. public in consumed alcohol of amount the reduce They alcohol reduce to helping of way effective and accepted an are bans Alcohol or edits minor any make to Bylaws and Policyamendments to Attachment A tocorrect any identified errors ortypographical edits. Social Manager the Authorises LocalGovernment Act r 2002 andAucklandCouncil Alcohol ControlBylaw 2014. relevant with accordance in are (a) in decisions the that Notes AlcoholControlBylaw with2014, commencement a date of ocal boards have the delegated responsibility delegated the have boards ocal Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
sit h lcl or, tf hv udrae a aayi o lgc cucl information council legacy of analysis an undertaken have staff board, local the assist CP2015/04265
-
relatedcrime or disorder.
the consumption of alcohol in public places and are enforced by the the by enforced are and places public in alcohol of consumption the
. hs nomto hs en rsne a lcl or wrsos in workshops board local at presented been has information This
analyse
h Acln Cucl loo Cnrl ya 21. Alcohol 2014. Bylaw Control Alcohol Council Auckland the
vdne rm eetd oa cmuiy rus and groups community local selected from evidence o opee h rve. tf hv ue this used have Staff review. the complete to
to to
engagementprocess. review existing local alcohol bans in their in bans alcohol local existing review
with an amendment to the the to amendment an with pursuant to the AucklandCouncil the to pursuant der. 31 October2015.
equirements of the the of equirements
- related harm. related
ie f one of time
Page Page New 107
a
Item 19 Item 19 201Reviewbans alcohol of 17. alcoholCurrent local bans Commen 16. 15. 14. 13. Decision 12. 11. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
includedin Attachments A. summarisedin thetable below. haveThese beenindependently assessed and evidence is There are currentlylocal11 alcohol bans in the RangesWaitakere Local Board area decision the AttachmentC. of detail Further Themostimportant requirements as outlined the in bylaware: willlapse October31 on 2015. b Alcohol retained. be to ban alcohol existing an allow higherLocalbeto threshold2002GovernmentActintroducedmeta to the Changes to retained complywith range a of new statutory and bylaw requirements. the decisions, making In retained after31 October2015 to is board local the of required decision The a use to preference processto complete a a expressed to has subject board local be The will which bans alcohol new the of separateprocess of to commence after31 October 2015 responsibility consideration the nor is Committee, which significanceBylaws regional of areas in bans - making requirements . . . . consideration usingto one ofthe followingtimes forconsistency: of occupiers, or owners of premises interestswithin the of representative are believe to reason has ban alcohol community of consideration andbe can justified as a reasonable limitationon people'srights and freedoms evidence the of light the in proportionate and appropriate is ban alcohol the that area havebeen to shown be can that disorder or crime of level high a experienced has area ban alcohol the that evidence 1 period bans with limitedevidence in the and groups for community local Police from evidence Zealand New the by provided September2013 data disorder and crime alcohol of disorder thatwas evidentwhen alcohol the ban was initi level the on available) (where information council legacy area the and times ofeach alcoholban ts
7pm on the day before to 7am on the day after any weekend, public holiday or Christmas/NewYearholiday period (weekend andholiday holiday alcohol ban). public weekend, any after day the on 7am to before day the on 7pm alcoholban time(night saving outside daylight 7am to 7pm savingdaylightand 7pm to 10pm 7pm 7amto daily (evening alcohol ban) hours,24 7 days a week (atall times alcohol ban);
5
consideration of the views of owners, occupiers, or persons that council that persons or occupiers, owners, of views the of consideration the the review. This processinvolves the gatheringand consideration of: the area the whichto t – )
30September 2014 by alcohol ban area
local board local
.
- aig eurmns s pedd o h pooa in proposal the to appended is requirements making -
focus legacycouncil information andpolice data.
must be satis be must
caused or made worse by alcohol consumption in the in consumption alcoholby worse made or caused ed solutions as an alternative or complement to an to complement or alternative an as solutions ed he alcoholhe ban willapply
decide which existing alcohol bans should be should bans alcohol existing which decide ans that do not meet the higher threshold higher the meet not do that ans
organisations fied that any existing alcohol bans to be to bans alcohol existing any that fied .
agtd omnt engagement community targeted allymade
n ac 21 fr alcohol for 2015 March in
- eae cie or crime related euaoy and Regulatory
Page Page
108
18. Evidence May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of 22. Recommendation 21. 20. 19. Options
loo bn ms b dtrie o eiec o hg lvl o alcohol of levels high of disorder. evidence on determined be must bans retention alcohol the means review this of requirements statutory the that note to important is It evidenceprovided individual for alcohol bans in AttachmentsAan of summary review the can board local lapse, the or retain to bans alcoholwhich of terms In withoutamendments the to areas or times) or to allowban the lapse. to the retain To options. two has board local the areas these of each For Evidencealcohol of Staffrecommend to: Beach (1) Park,beachor foreshorereserve (7) Cemetery (1) Town centre (2)
Typealcoholof ban area (
o o o o o o o o o o o areas timesof one (AttachmentA): ban alcohol existing 11 following the retain identifyany changes to the listof alcohol bans proposed toretain (AttachmentA). confirm list the of alcohol bans proposed to be retained (AttachmentA) alcoholban whether retained lapsed. or community Tuesdayafter Easter 7pm effective be to ban alcohol Piha community local a from evidence legacycouncil information
GlenEden Town Centre GlenEden PicnicArea Ce WaikumeteCemetery Titirangi Town Ce TitirangiBeach Piha ParrsPark and MihaRoad Reserve Reserve Bay French Esplanade, Bay French including Bay) (French Bay Otitori Kaurilands Domain Harold MoodyPark
ramcoPark
-
oue sltos ae en dniid o opiet h estn Piha exsiting the compliment to identified been have solutions focused
-
relatedcrime or disorder
ntre
support the retentionof existing11 alcohol bans number)
organisation
–
for each alcoholban indicates that:
7am daily from daily 7am hours24 a day seven days a week hours24 a day seven days a week Holidayban 7pm
supports the amending the time of the of time the amending the supports –
7am ih mnmns o h ae or area the to amendments with
Alcoholban time
Friday of Labour Weekend to to Weekend Labour of Friday dchoose to:
alcohol ban (with or (with ban alcohol - eae cie or crime related
Page Page
109 of
Item 19 Item 19 201Reviewbans alcohol of Authorisers Authors Signatories C B A No. Attachments 29. Implementation 28. 27. impact Māori statement 26. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideration 25. 24. Nextsteps 23. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
None. March in helpto reducealcohol held Hui a non that believe and at principle, in bans alcohol representatives whenua mana from Feedback of outcomes Māori the Planthe for TāmakiMakaurau. with consistent is which wellbeing, and health for opportunities increases harm related alcohol Managing groups community and local from evidence and data, police recent options, information, process council review legacy requirements, making decision statutory the with presented been Sincecommencement reviewthe the localof 2014 the in boardworkshops November at throughthe Integrated Bylaw board Review and Implementation programme. local the of Implementation Staffwill update the registerof local alcohol bans to commence 31on 2015.October Thereasons for this recommendationare:
organisations
to provideto greater regional consistency. times the alcohol the bans retained areappropriate, proportionate, and reasonable allexisting alcohol bans (withamendment an to thetime for thePiha ban) alcohol of level high a of evidencesufficient is there
Whau Glenn Boyd KatarainaMaki Paul Wilson Kylie Hill Decision Maps Alcoholbans proposed to retain Title
of alcohol bans retained are aligned to those contained in the bylaw in order in bylaw the in contained those to aligned are retained bans alcohol of
5
.
- - makingrequirements
PolicyAnalyst
- - - relatedharm.
Relationship ManagerHenderson Team LeaderTeam Bylaws -
GM
-
Community& Social Policy associated with people consuming alcohol in public places places public in alcohol consuming people with associated
eiin eg udtn sgae wl b coordinated be will signage) updating (e.g. decision
- regulatory approaches should be considered be should approaches regulatory - - Massey, Ranges,Waitakere related crime or disorder to retain to disorder or crime related
05 supported 2015
Page Page Page 125 113 111 has 110
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Reviewalcoho of l l 2015 bans
Page Page 111
Attachment A Item 19 Attachment A Item 19 2015Reviewbans alcohol of May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 112
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of
Page Page 113
Attachment B Item 19 Attachment B Item 19 2015Reviewbans alcohol of May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 114
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of
Page Page 115
Attachment B Item 19 Attachment B Item 19 2015Reviewbans alcohol of May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 116
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of
Page Page 117
Attachment B Item 19 Attachment B Item 19 2015Reviewbans alcohol of May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 118
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of
Page Page 119
Attachment B Item 19 Attachment B Item 19 2015Reviewbans alcohol of May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 120
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of
Page Page 121
Attachment B Item 19 Attachment B Item 19 2015Reviewbans alcohol of May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 122
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of
Page Page 123
Attachment B Item 19
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board 2015Reviewbans alcohol of
Page Page 125
Attachment C Item 19 Attachment C Item 19 2015Reviewbans alcohol of May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 126
3. 2. ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpo FileNo.: DogAccess RulesReview May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog a) That the Recommendation/s 6. 5. 4.
Staffrecommend adopting options thatwould: consider inc to and changes proposed consultation, on proposal, staff have decision identifieda range ofoptions that local the board may select from. public board local the for assist To rules access dog local submissions proposalto the before makinga final decision. to changes proposed loc the process, review the of part As local of dog accessrules selectedon park, beach and foreshore areas. review a undertake to meeting business 2014 November 13 its at resolved board local The localdog access rules for the to changes containingproposal of statement a in included be to options to approvalseek To Adopts the followingoptions in relationto the dog accessrules reviewed: Staffwill update the statementof proposal to reflect decisions the made by local the board. ia n Nrh Piha North and beaches Piha TeHenga/Bethells Beach se Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
CP2014/29773
and replacewith specificrules where appropriate. remove retain anunder control off changethe default under control off off on control under the retain and defined off suitable retaining while comfort and safety public ensure and wildlife of protection the bettersupportHenga/Bethells to beachesandPiha Te North Piha, on rules the amend
- leash rulenineon other local beaches
Topic the general rules for picnic and fitness areas, bushwalks and protected wildlifeprotected bushwalksand areas, fitnessand picnic rulesfor general the -
Statement of Proposal Statement
-
leash areas
Waitākere Ranges Waitākere LocalBoard area. - - Option 2: Option Pihab 1: Option EITHER andtime season rule. 3: Option off option), and leash 2: Option Henga/BethellsBeach and Henga Te Park, 1: Option EITHER
leash rule onpartsor all 27 of local parks StatementofProposal -
leash rule on 13 local 13 on rule leash
eaches al board must adopt a statement of proposal of any of proposal of statement a adopt must board al OR
-
leashrule for localparks a to default on apply an amended mix of rules including aincludingrules of mixamended applyan retain the current rules on Piha and North and Piha on rules current the retain apply an apply apply an amended mix of prohibited, on prohibited, of mix amended an apply
,OR
ean h cret ue o Te on rules current the retain
- es rls saf recommended (staff rules leash
amended mix of prohibited, on prohibited, of mix amended
Option
beaches and apply an under control under an apply and beaches
ue n h saeet of statement the in lude
OR
- leash rule - - Page Page
127
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog c) b) May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
iv) iii) ii) i) Subjectto any amendments to reflect local the board decision in (a): section 10(8)of the Dog ControlAct 1996. Confirmintentionits amendto Auckland the CouncilPolicy Dogson 2012 pursuan and protectedwildlife are bushwalksareas, apparatus rules confusing access dog ambiguous and of Clarification Localand sports parks Localbeaches
uhrs te aae oil oiy n Blw t ae n mnr dt or edits minor any make to Bylaws and Policy Social Manager the Authorise of Statement the in special contained the amendments using proposed Proposal: consultation the that public Confirm for A Attachment consultative procedure. in 2015’ May 2012 Dogs on Policy Council Auckland to Amendments Proposal of ‘Statement titled proposal of statement the Adopt board chair, to make any amendments any make to chair, board local the with consultation in Bylaws, and Policy Social Manager the Authorise or errors identified any typographicale correct to Proposal of Statement the to amendments
–
inc n fitness and picnic LocalGovernment Act 2002 andDog ControlAct 1996. legislati relevant with accordance in are region to relation in decision access rules contained in theAuckland any Council PolicyDogson 2012 with inconsistent not are maki for criteria and principles access rules contained in theAuckland policy, Council PolicyDogson 2012 the with consistent are
-
Statement of Proposal Statement dits.
d as
EITHER seasonrule. 3: Option parks (staff recommended option), adjacent including rules season and time and leash Option1: EITHER off specific 27 recommendedoption). list and leash 3: Option EITHER localbeaches. seaso and time 3: Option off beaches (staff control recommendedoption), under an apply and 2: Option paau, uhak n poetd idie rules wildlife protected (staff recommended option). and bushwalk apparatus, 2: Option leash87 andlist specific off 2: Option alllocal parks, 1: Option alllocal beaches, 1: Option
retain thecurrent rules, apply a mix of rules including a time and time a including rules of mix a apply retain the current default off default current the retain the retain hne h dfut ue o prs o on to parks for rule default the change ean h on the retain hne h dfut ue o prs o on to parks for rule default the change pl a i o udr oto on control under of mix a apply
eoe eea pci ae, fitness area, picnic general revoke –
to the Statement of Proposal to to Proposal of Statement the to OR n and under control off control under and n
Waitākere Ranges Waitākere OR
ve requirements in particular the particular in requirements ve current default on default current
- es rl o 1 beaches 13 on rule leash -
leash areas, - - es aes (staff areas leash es rl t nine to rule leash OR
OR
Local Board Area Board Local
OR
- - - leash rules to to rules leash leash rule on on rule leash leash rule on on rule leash
O - R wide dog dog wide
g dog ng - leash, reflect
t t to - - Page Page 128
7. Background May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog 11. 10. 9. 8.
To assist the develo to the assist To (CP2014/23994) meeting business 2014 November 2015using this process. 13 its at reviewundertake a rulesselectedlocalaccess on beachanddog park, of foreshorein areas resolved board The the reviewlocalof dog access rules as follows: with boards local assist to process annual standard a established has body governing The park, local for rules access dog beachand foreshoreareas. Thisdoes not include the review review to responsibility delegated the have boards Local vi) v) where necessary to adopt a statement of proposal for public consultation and to appoint a appoint hearing panel. to and consultation public for proposal of statement a adopt to necessary where and changes, anypropose to not or whether decide to is board the of required decision The wereobtained from:
eeae t te hipro te blt t mk cags o h panel the to changes make to ability the Chairperson the to Delegates relevantinformation and recommendchanges tothe Board. names] Appoints decisionsmade by local the board. h Lcl ra ln eeomn poes o T HnaBtel Bah including Beach Henga/Bethells Te for process publicat feedback a community day in January201 development Plan Area Local the ParrsPark on access dog about 2015 March in Park Parrs at Karnival Kauri the attending people ‘intercept’an on dog were 210 which of area, Board owners Local and 169were non Ranges from Waitākere responses the 379 in the living on persons focusses analysis The responses. 512 had survey The residentsand visitors through atmaori two huiin March2015 EdenMarch in 2015 in workshop a at or contact direct by environmentalgroups and resident selected councilinvolvedstaff in animal parks, management,biodiversity and biosecurity changesto dog acces the governingbody will review toa report update bylaw the dogsonin September August local the willboard hearings,deliberationshold andmake decisions submissionson by forsubmi notified publicly be will boards) local other from proposals with (together proposal the proposed of May by Proposal of changesno areproposed, the reviewprocess forthatlocation ends at this point Statement a adopt to loca to changes need will board local the unavailabilityor anyof of those persons. th where v) under appointed
as a panel to receive, hear and deliberate on submissions and other other and submissions on deliberate and hear receive, to panel a as
ssionsas part of dog the registrationprocess June in isr name] [insert -
Statement of Proposal Statement
pment of the Statement of Proposal information and community views community and information Proposal of Statement the of pment - l dog access rules (the topic of this report). It is noted here that where that here noted is It report). this of topic (the rules access dog l site surve
srules willcommence in October.
(as chair), chair), (as - yPihaat beach in March2015 dogowners is becomes necessary because of the withdrawal the of because necessary becomes is
an on an
- isr a least at [insert linesurvey in March2015
5. w mr bad members board more two
of regionalof parks.
Page Page
Glen 129
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog 20. 19. Beachand Henga/Bethells Te adjacent park 18. 17. 16. Comments 15. 14. 13. 12. Decision May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
Bayiscontrolled by the Departmentof Conservation anddogs are prohibitedon the reserve. adjacent Waitākere to and lagoon the of sidenorthern the ReserveRecreationon Henga Te Thecurrent local dogaccess rules for TeHenga/Bethells (from north to south) are: to not or whether determining in board local the assist to proposeany changes. analysis an is following The polarised)views consideredare in away achieveto and a reasonablefair The d 2012. Dogs on Policy Counciloften (and all ensuring by Auckland rules access dog to changes for requests the manage to seeks policy by guided is achieved be to is this How animals,property and habitat, and needs the ofdogs and their owners. of protection comfort, and safety public for provide to wayeffective an are rules access Dog Fu understand ‘on the ground’. to easy rules access dog make to is requirement practical important most The having means This owners. their and dogs of needs regardto: the and comfort and authority safety delegated public prov and access dog on decisions ensure to policy is requirement statutory important most The statutory, of range a with requirements. comply changes proposed decisiona makingIn rtherdetail of thedecision - making requirements dunearea. off control allowedunder are dogs entrancepoint) southernto the end the from Beach) allowedare dogs off portionof TeHenga/Bethells Beach,and under control on control under allowed dogs Beach) from the allowedare dogs on controlunder ErangiPoints off control under allowed are dogs d Section 10(4)Dog Control1996Act exercise the andrecreational needsof dogs and theirowners. (including public the dogs practicable, is withou amenities that public and are streets extent use to the children families) to the enabling, of not importance or the whether children, by frequented accompaniedby adults are that places public uncontr have to dogs allowing in danger inherent the avoid to need the need the to minimise danger, distress, and nuisance to the community generally ogsare allowed offcontrolunder
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
on the statement ofstatementproposal,theon the
Waitākere RiverWaitākere mouth to themiddle of portion thebeach
under control on controlunder middle portion of the beach (south of the dunes walkway beach beach walkway dunes the of (south beach the of portion middle d
-
making requirementsisprovided Attachment in B.
- es bten urs ad ust n h middle the on sunset and sunrise between leash - - - - leash atall times on Bay Waitākere leash at any time on that part of Te Henga (Bethells Henga of Te part that on anyleash at time (Bethel Henga of Te part that on anyleash at time leash on the adjacent the on leash
- of beach the leash at all times on times all at leash
local boardlocal t fear of attack or intimidation by by intimidation or attack of fear t
Te Henga Park, including theincluding Park, Henga Te - Ihumoana Island, Korau and Korau Island, Ihumoana leash atall other times
must be satisfied that anybesatisfiedthatmust
ecision.
olled access to to access olled
Page Page
ide for for ide
130 ls
22. 21. Communityand staff views May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog 27. 26. 25. 24. 23.
onlinesurvey: o Beach), Henga/Bethells Te only (not beaches all Across theOf 379 locals responding onlineto the survey: below,including need the appropriate for off resident the g environmental from and and Group Beachcare Henga Te the of representative a from Feedback the at obtained feedback including process, Plan Area Te com Local use the people through how and Feedback when to relation in sought wereHenga/Bethells Beach andwhat sortof rules theyconsider should bein placedogs. for views staff and Community Feedbackreceived from Auckland Councilparks and animal managementwasstaff the to Weekend Labour starts firstweekend inMay. season wider the March, in weekend first the to December S Beach Bethells The munityday in January2015is: beach off dog localother of optionslimited the of light in met beowners shoulddog of needs the busysummerperiod is relativelye.g.1short, December to 1 March public support safetyrules to duringand comfort summer appropriate,are however the where9am preference the wascontrol under off non winter, in oncontrol or off on control non under allowedoffcontrol are dogs winter and summer in times other control all at and under summer, during be to dogs preferred owners dog Sundayin Septemberto firstSunday in April) (34 non cent) (28 March 1 on finishes and cent) per (29 December 1 or cent) per (29 holidays) school and public weekends, on only (but weekend labour either from starts that rules season and time a preferred owners dog theymostvisited during summer. beach local the was Beach Henga/Bethells Te that stated respondents of cent per 15 per45 cent of respondents visited Henga/Bethells Te Beach the in last year alsostrong a message forprohibition in area. that on and Park, Henga Te of area grass off for preference a indicates community the from feedback place to supportunderstanding and enhance compliance inare rules communicatewhy the to importantvery is educationalsignage appropriate availabilityotheroffof off for support substantial also is there dunesin the area and at southern the end of thebeach off and wildlife regarding concerns strong has community the
- leash - - o onr peerd os o e rhbtd ewe 1a ad p, under 5pm, and 10am between prohibited be to dogs preferred owners dog dogowners preferred apply andseasonruletime to daylight a during savings (last
areas for residents of the local communities as well as visitors to this popular this to visitors wellas as communitieslocal the of residents for areas - - - leash leash between 9am and 10am and betweenand10am and 9am betweenleash
Statement of Proposal Statement - dog owners preferred under control on control under preferred owners dog roup workshop is largely reflected in the recommendations in the table the in recommendations the in reflected largely is workshop roup
-
leashbefore 9am and after 7pm in summer r Lf Svn Pto’ pa sao i fo te is weed in weekend first the from is season peak Patrol’s Saving Life urf
- leashareas in surrounding the environment
-
- leash areas. per cent) or when daylight saving ends (25 per (25 ends saving daylight when or cent) per leash for the dune area of Te Henga Park, but Park, Henga Te of area dune the for leash - es aes n h bah ie te limited the given beach the on areas leash
- leash.
–
on
42 per42 cent) f the 379 locals responding to the to responding locals 379 the f - - es bten 0m n 5pm and 10am between leash leash at all times except before except times all at leash
5pm and 7pm and either under either and7pm and 5pm
- leash dog leash - leash dogs, particularly dogs, leash
access on the the on access
that: Page Page
131
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog 29. 28. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
of of TeHenga/Bethells Beach are summarised here. s The the beach, the of part southern the at dunes, Ihumoana Island,Korauand Erangi Points with a onfocus sunset to Dotterels sunrise. Zealand New and seals Penguins, Blue rec Feedback rs ae o T Henga Te Park of area Grass entrancepoint beach walkway dunes the off current the of start the from area Beach current to daytime off between southwards area entra Beach river mouth(Waitākere of Bay) north area Beach Henga Te Park of area Dunes ErangiPoints & Korau Island, Ihumoana entrance point beach dunes walkway the of southwards area foreshore and Beach foreshore and areas beach All Area pecific views of parks, animal management and biodiversity staff for the different areasdifferent the for managementbiodiversityanimalparks,andstaff viewspecific of
rulesadjacent on parks should complement theproposed beachrules. appropriateeducational signage supportcan understanding and enhance compliance
c a lgo and lagoon at nce
- leash area ie fo Acln Cucl idvriy tf ietfe te ed o protect to need the identified staff biodiversity Council Auckland from eived
-
leash area to area leash -
Statement of Proposal Statement
d
Off breeding sunset) to (sunrise season the Off December) September (1 season breeding On sunset)to On sunset)to Off breedingseason On Decemb September (1 season breeding during Prohibited all times at Prohibited andsunset sunrise between Prohibited Recommendation ------es during leash (sunrise leash (sunrise leash leash outsideof leash outside leash
er)
– –
31 31
uprs h protectio vulnerablewildlife. the Supports Reason eadn pbi sft and area.grass of usage safety of type to due comfort public regarding t and dogs of needs the Supports beach. the balance on elsewhere prohibitions for a represent to access quo off additional provides status and the retains season Off the to returning dunesa and leaving vulnerablebirds supports season On quality water issues. lagoon to given consideration Also comfort. and safety public supports Primarily for the balance beach. on elsewhere a prohibitions provides represent to and off dog additional owners their and dogs of needs the Supports er wes N concerns No owners. heir - - es otie h breeding the outside leash breeding the during leash
reaof the beach.
- es access leash
of n - leash
Page Page 132
Options in relationto Te Henga/BethellsBeach May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog Seemap in Attachment C times) September 1 between season breeding the during prohibited be would but area) dune the (including Park Henga Te on allowed be would Dogs parkto the entrance off BethellsRoad. time off allowed be to continue would Dogs on entrance end beach southern the to walkway point) dunes the (at beach the the from Beach Henga/Bethells Te pr be would Dogs andsunset sunrise). on and sunset and sunrise between off (currently sunrise and sunset September on area (‘beach Beach Bethells sunset and off allowed be would Dogs times(currently on beach the the on sunset on allowed be would Dogs time). off on (currently Points Erangi prohibited and Korau be would Dogs prohibited and Bay, time).any sunris Waitākere and sunset on between sunset and off allowed be would Dogs Effectof change (from north to south) 2 Option No change. Option leash andoff Effectof change Henga/BethellsBeach and Heng Te 1 Option - - leash). 1 between season breeding the during leash Waitāker s on the grass area of Te Henga Park adjacent Park Henga Te of area grass the on s
that part of Te Henga/Bethells Beach from BeachHenga/Bethells Te of part that pl a aedd i o poiie, on prohibited, of mix amended an apply (‘beach area 1’)and prohibited at all other other all at prohibited 1’)and area (‘beach – –
n h mdl prin of portion middle the on Rvr ot t te ide oto of portion middle the to mouth River e
- 31 31 December, and prohibited between prohibited and December, 31 leashrules (staff recommendation). ean h cret ue o Te on rules current the retain
December (currently off (currently December ohibited at all times on times all at ohibited - leashat all times).
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
-
- leash on all other parts of parts other all on leash (‘beach area 3’) area (‘beach leash between sunrise to to sunrise between leash (urnl off (currently e - -
es bten sunrise between leash sunrise between leash 2’)
bt eurd o be to required but , - es a ay time any at leash Island, Ihumoana middle portion of portion middle a Park.
-
es between leash
- es a any at leash
- - es a all at leash e Henga/ Te leash at all at leash that part of part that
(currently - es at leash
- Advantages Disadvantages Advantages AdvantagesDisadvantages and Disadvantages eann aes f h beach the of betweenand sunset sunrise areas remaining protec broader and ErangiPoints Park, Henga Te of area dunes the beach, the of area southern the on wildlife of protection the for and provides better parks by and preferred biodiversitystaff. than wildlife community of level protection lower a provides owners.their and dogs of needs the off for provides of level h bah uig summer during middle portionof beach). to mouth beach River (Waitākere pa the busier the on owners dog non by preferred public comfort and safety of level the provide not may beach the and park on owners dog by preferred access off maylevelof provide the not middle the breedingseason in and porti Park, Henga Te of area grass Bay, Waitākere on daytime off control retaining under by owners their and dogs of needs the for provides on of the beach outside of the the of outside beach the of on hmaa sad n Korau and Island Ihumoana
- es acs better access leash tion of wildlife on the the on wildlife of tion
-
es dg access dog leash
Page Page - rts of of rts leash 133 -
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog 33. 32. Staffrecommendation 31. 30. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar Seemap in Attachment D leash andoff dunes the the from to on of mix a (currently pointentrance beach walkway Beach southwards mouth Henga/Bethells River Te Waitākere of part that rule season and time a to subject be would Dogs l Park Hengaon control under be would area) Te dune the (including of area remaining the for rule The HengaPark would be the sameas Option 2. beach walkway dunes entrance the of Island, (southwards Ihumoana beach southe the Bay, Points, Erangi Waitākere and Korau for rules The Effectof change 3 Option Option time andtime season rule. eash at all eash at times(currently off off 10am to Sunrise Winter ( off 10am to Sunrise Summer(
- - Thereasons for this recommendationare thatthis option: beachand adjacent parks (Option 2): apply to recommend Staff of comfort and safety the for seasonprovide non not and or times owners dog standard on the restrictive too of be adoption either the would as option practicable reasonably a be to the of use The section the on all local parks forcompleteness. recommendationsNote: The Parkrepeated Henga containedare above Te in the in table for leash leash
- - dogowners.
1 April Labourto Weekend apply an amended mix of rules including a including rules of mix amended an apply bah ra ’ ad h gas ra f Te of area grass the and 3’) area ‘beach significantlyincreases the currentlevels wildlifeof protection
Labour Weekend to31 March
- leashareas and times). on to 4pm 10am prohibited to 7pm 10am
- leash
region -
Statement of Proposal Statement
- wide standard summer beach summer standard wide off to Sunset 4pm off to Sunset 7pm -
d leashat all times). - - an amended mix of prohibited, on prohibited, of mix amended an leash leash
) n at f the of part rn
prohibited Sunrise to Sunset prohibited Sunrise to Sunset
)
on
- - Advantages AdvantagesDisadvantages and Disadvantages times and season was no was season and times ces uig ih s eid and periods use high during access on with point entrance beach mouth th River to southwards Waitākere the from the day the during owners anddog of needs comfort and safety public between balance better a provides grass the and ofarea TeHenga Park Bay Waitākere on off control re under by owners their and dogs of beach needs the for provides the of betweenand sunset sunrise areas remaining the on wildlife of protection broader and ErangiPoints Park, Henga Te of area dunes the beach, the on wildlife of protection the for provides better area ofarea TeHenga Park. wildlife for protection of levelrequired the provide not may preferredaccess by dog owners off maylevelof provide the not dog owners non by preferred public comfort and safety of level the provide not may balance dunes c area the in owners better dog and of wildlife needs of a protection between for provides between sunrise andsunset off -
leash access outside those times those outside access leash - omparedto Option2. leash and off and leash hmaa sad n Korau and Island Ihumoana
southern area of the the of area southern -
dns walkway dunes e es dg access dog leash - leash rules to the to rules leash ann daytime taining
n h dunes the in
t considered t
Page Page - - leash leash
134 -
36. 35. 34. North and Piha Piha May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog 41. 40. 39. Communit 38. 37.
North PihaNorth Esplanade, Les Park, Waygood Piha Esplanade Reserve and PihaNorth Strand. is Beach Piha North to AdjacentReserve. Road South Piha and Domain Piha is Beach Piha allowed are Dogs Lookouts Gap Thecurrent rules Pihaon andNorth Pihabeaches (north to so and Tasman and Piha North Rock, (Lion SpecialManagement Zones). Beaches Piha North and Piha ar Dogs Beach Piha on Road,and on adjacentlocal parks. rules access dog the review Nort and to Rock) (excludingLion authority delegated has board local The b previously has has delegatedresponsibility who for their review. and Piha themselves rules North the of terms and in both Piha users beach at for confusing rules as identified regional and local of mix current The North PihaNorth beaches). andPiha combines survey the of results (the beaches Piha North and Piha on surveyonline the to respondents the for rules access dog preferred of summary a shows below table The theOf 379 local respondents onlineto the survey: Piha the use people beacheshow and what sortof rules theyconsider should in be place fordogs. and when to relation in sought were views staff and Community 10am 5pmto 1 / December to 1 March) only) holidays and (weekends (Lab Summer Dogowners main beacharea) of end southern to Streams (Piha Piha PihaNorth Area itr 2 ac t 30 to March November) (2 Winter on - yand staff views leash providesthe needsoffor dogsand their owners in threeoff beach public for provides 23 per cent of respondents stated that Piha Beach, and 14 per cent of respondents of cent per 14 statedNorth PihaBeach, was local the beach they mostvisitedand du Beach, Piha that stated respondents of cent per 23 Piha visited cent per 69 and Beach Piha Beachthe in last year North visited respondents of cent per 51
e prohibited from all areas of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park in the vicinity of of vicinity the in Park Regional Ranges Waitākere the of areas all from prohibited e
-
off 10am and after5pm Before Statement of Proposal Statement u Weekend our
under control off control under - leash
safety and comfort year round at the busier entrance part of the the of part entrance busier the at round year comfort and safety appropriatemarker poles. prohibited controlunder on prohibited on of PihaNorth Beach, on portion middle on sunset and sunrise between leash off (regionalrule) times all at Beach Piha North of end northern at prohibited Dogaccess rule
- leash on remainingareas of
h Piha Beach from Lion Rock to approximately 61 North Piha North approximately61 to Rock Lion from BeachPiha h
- Winter (non Prohibited 9am 7pmto Septemberto first Sunday April in saving (daylight Summer Non
leash at any time on adjacent local parks. Adjacent to to Adjacent parks. local adjacent on time any at leash during daylightsaving within any rock or reef wildlife area shown by by shown area wildlife reef or rock any within
- dog owners - leash outside daylight saving
-
leashat other times - daylightsaving)
beach.
off after and 7pm 9am Before uth)are:
- -
leash areas. lea
-
sh at udy in Sunday last
ringsummer.
)
Page Page
een een 135
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog 45. 44. 43. 42. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
aaeet oe i priua Bu Pnun ad erl wt a ou o sne to sunset on focus a with Petrels and Penguins sunrise. Blue particular in Special Piha Zone, North andManagement Zones, Management Special Lookout rules Gap Rock and Lion access Tasman on and dog wildlife Piha protect that to prohibitions was park regional staff adjacent support biodiversity should Council Auckland from received Feedback Feedbackreceived from Auckland Councilparks and animal managementwasstaff that: beach the interceptsurvey Piha for beach: from rules access dog preferred the of summary a shows below table The interceptsurvey North for Pihabeach: f rules access dog preferred the of summary a shows below table The off Winter (non on 10am 6pmto Summer(daylight savings) Dogowners off Winter (non on 10am 5pmto Summer(daylight savings) Dogowners off - - - - - leash leash leash leash leash rulesadjacent on parks should complement theproposed beachrules. appropriateeducational signage supportcan understanding and enhan popularbeaches off dog need Waitākere the RangesRegional are appropriate in prohibitions existing support and wildlife vulnerable protect to rules 1 March duri 1 e.g. short, relativelyis period comfortsummer busy however the areas, beach and safety public support to rules
s of dog owners also need to be met in light of the limited options of other local other of options limited the of light in met be to need also owners dog of s - - - leash areas for residents of the local communities as well as visitors to these to visitors as well as communities local the of residents for areas leash
daylightsaving) daylightsaving) -
off and after6pm 10am Before off and after5pm 10am Before Statement of Proposal Statement - - leash leash
d
on 10am 5pmto Winter (non on 9am 7pmto saving Septemberto first Sunday April in (daylight Summer Non off Winter (non on 9am 6pmto saving Septemberto first Sunday April in (daylight Summer Non
on Prohibited 10am 6pmto - - - -
leash leash leash leash - - -
leash dog owners dog owners
- -
daylightsaving) daylightsaving)
/
on 10am and 6pmto 7pm to 9am g umr r aporae n both on appropriate are summer ng - leash eoe a ad after and 9am Before off aft and 6pm 9am Before off after 5pm and 10am Before off 6pm
- - - leash leash leash - -
at udy in Sunday last in Sunday last
) )
rom the beach the rom off 9am and after7pm Before - leash
ce compliance st
December toDecember
Page Page South , er
user user
136
46. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
of Piha/North of PihaBeaches are summarised here (fromnorth to south): managementbiodiversityanimalparks,andstaff viewsspecific of The PihaDomain PihaSouth Road Reserve adjacent parks: Beach Piha Marine 61 Parade North. entrance beach opposite the of southwards point a From PihaBeach: Beach/North Piha PihaNorth Esplanade Les Park Waygood PihaEsplanade Reserve Beach PihaNorth Strand Piha adjacentparks North all present. are at flags the flags when times the of side surf either metres 20 and flags the between above described area the Within current regionalpark rule). North Piha Marine 61 opposite access track to 61 North Parade entrance beach opposite the of northwards point a From North PihaBeach: Area
od budr with (boundary Road
- :
Statement of Proposal Statement
ust to sunset On Proposed rule times On times at Prohibited On described and times the during location On to times other all sunset sunrise Off sunrise - - - - - leash the in leash: leash: leash: es a all at leash
all
opeet pooe adjacent beachrules. proposed Complements mostdensely used. is that beach the of area the on focus will public and beach period summer the during safety regarding the concerns patrols support club the time of surf period the during flags Applying prohibitionPihaon beach. off dog additional provides and owners their and dogs of needs the Supports wild vulnerable of protection the Supports Reason opeet pooe adjacent beachrules. proposed Complements in comfortpurposes. and safety busy public for day very the during is beach sum of Area the community understand.to for easier is rule single Simple, dusk. and dawn at particularly vicinity, the in wildlife of protection the Supports regionalpark prohibitions. existing the complement would Rule - es acs t off to access leash life. e ad arns prohibition warrants and mer
a restriction between the the between restriction a
for the different areasdifferent the for
- e proposed set
Page Page 137
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog Options in relationto Piha/North Piha May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar os ol b alwd ne cnrl on control under allowed be would Dogs on and prohibited leash). of mix (currently Beach Piha of southwards times all at prohibited be would Dogs sunset. off an with area leash off current the of south and north the to areas leash off the Th sunrise. and on control under allowed be to continue would Dogs present. are flags the when the of metres on be must dogs that boun park regional the from Beach Piha North on sunset and off allowed be would Dogs Effectof change 2 Option No change. Effectof change Seemap in Attachment North and Piha Pihabeaches (currentlyoff to adjacent parks all on times all parks (staff recommendation). adjacent including rules season and time and leash Pihabeaches. 1 Option 61 Marine Parade North to the southern end of of end southern the to North Parade Marine 61 -
es ae b rpaig otos f h on the of portions replacing by area leash retain the current rules on Piha and North and Piha on rules current the retain dary to 61 Marine Parade North, except North, Parade Marine 61 to dary on prohibited, of mix amended an apply
surf flags of the North Piha Surf Club Surf Piha North the of flags surf
s pin ol ices te ie of size the increase would option is - -
Statement of Proposal Statement leash rule between sunriseandbetween rule leash - Option leash within and between 20 20 between and within leash
E
- leash). - leash between sunrise sunrise between leash -
d es bten sunset between leash
Beaches
- es at leash
- - - - Advantages Disadvantages Advantages Disadvantages AdvantagesDisadvantages and and biodiversitystaff. parks wildlife by preferred of than level protection lower a provides public the for confusing are rules current Piha and Piha North beach. on areas on control under on comfort p better dogs of and theirowners needs the for provides better beach off es acs peerd by preferred owners,particularly Pihaon beach. off access of level leash the provide not may PihaBeach yearround North on comfort and safety public of level desired the provide not may duringbusy beachusage times. comfort and safety public supports th area enlarging by and sunset sunrise North between on beach owners Piha of their needs and the dogs for provides better access prohibitions dog park complements regional existing and beach Piha on protection wildlife of provision better - es acs o Nrh Piha North on access leash
rovides for public safety and safety public for rovides
off e Page Page - - leash leash
dog dog
138
-
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog 50. 49. Staffrecommendation 48. 47. Seemap in Attachment F of mix (currently Beach Piha prohibited,on of end southern from the to Beach Piha beaches North on boundary park regional Piha and Piha North of part that rule season and time a to subject be would Dogs leash between on control under allowed be to continue would Dogs the be assame option 2. would parks local adjacent the for rules The Effectof change 3 Option seasonrule. off off leash 10amto Sunrise Winter ( off leash 10amto Sunrise Summer(
would either be too restrictive on dog owners or not provide for the safety and comfort of comfort and safety the for seasonprovide not and or times owners dog standard on the restrictive too of be adoption either the would as option practicable reasonably a be to of use The North and Piha to adjacent parks PihaBeaches are repeated in thesection allon local parks completeness. for for table this in contained recommendations The Note: Thereasons for this recommendationare thatthis option: adjacentparks (Option2): on prohibited, of mix a apply to recommend Staff non - dogowners.
1 April Labourto Weekend
rvds o te ed o dg ad hi onr o Nrh ia ec wt a larger a with beach Piha North on controlunder off owners their and dogs of needs the for provides usageareas (in the high the in summer during beach Piha North on comfort and safetypublic for provides providespublic for safety and comfort year round Pihaon beach currentprohibited areas curre the increases significantly apply a mix of rules including a time and and time a including rules of mix a apply
Labour Weekend to31 March
on to 4pm 10am prohibited to 7pm 10am -
leash,andoff sunsetand sunrise. -
leash the the
region -
Statement of Proposal Statement
p to off Sunset 4pm to off leash Sunset 7pm - - wide standard summer beach summer standard wide leash areas. - - leash leashrul vicinity of the surflifesaving flags)of beach the
)
es
onleash Sunrise to Sunset onleash Sunrise to Sunset ) . nt levels of protection for wildlife and further supports further and wildlife for protection of levels nt )
the the on - - leash and off and leash Disadvantages Advantages times and season was not considered not was season and times diinl ee o poeto for protection t of level provide additional not may dog by preferred owners off access of level leash the provide not may by preferred non comfort and safety public of level the provide not may times prohibited the between sunrise andsunset. off outside and periods prohibited withduring use high dogs the day the duringowners dog of needs and comfort and safety public between balance better a provides on and sunrise, adjacentlocal parks to sunset from wildlife protection of the providesfor wildlife onPiha Beach.
- dogowners
- leash rules to the beach and beach the to rulesleash
- leas
e required he
access h
Page Page 139 -
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog 58. 57. 56. 55. Communityand staff views 54. 53. 52. 51. rulesonDogbeaches access (excludinglocal Henga/Bethells) Te Piha and May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
area asarea a wildlife areaof inconcern relation todog accessrules. representativesenvironmentalFeedbackfrom residentand ofBayHuiaidentifiedthe groups Te (excluding beaches local on questions survey the to Henga/Bethellsand Piha beaches): responding locals 145 the Of the use people how theOf 379 locals responding onlineto the su and when to relation in sought beaches underreview and what weresortof rules theyconsider should bein placedogs. for views staff and Community Alllocal adjacentparks to beaches arecurrently subject defaultto the off rules of and arediscussed inthe previousmixsections. a to subject are Beach Henga/Bethells Te and Beach Piha North Beach, Piha subject anto under arearea LocalRangesinareasBoard the Waitākere Approximatelyand foreshore beach 22 controlunder off of part As under controlunder on or off on control under non summer in offcontrol on under allowed be to control dogs winter and summer in times underother all at and summer, during be to dogs preferred owners dog busy not between and 5pm 6pm aon winter weekend non of cent per 74 and owners dog of cent per 91 busy not between and 9am 10am aon winter weekend non of cent per 81 and owners dog of cent per 93 b not non of cent per 36 and owners dog of cent per 65 busy not between and 9am 10am aon summer weekend non of cent per 60 and owners dog of cent per 80 Sundayin Septemberto firstS non cent) per (25 ends saving daylight when or cent) per (28 March 1 on finishes and cent) per sch and public weekends, on only (but weekend labour either from starts that rules season and time a preferred owners dog requested owners dog of cent moreoff per 42 survey, the in made comments general the Bay of Otitori Beach, Titirangi total), in cent per (FrenchBay), Huia, Armour Bay, Bay and Wood SandysParade Beach (52 Piha North and Henga/Bethells and Piha of cent respondentsper 96 beachstated the theyvisited Huia, in summe most Henga/Bethells, Te Bay), (French Bay TitirangiBeach. Otitori Bay, Wood Armour are respondents all Bay, of more or cent per 20 by round year visited beaches the 9am where9am preference the wascontrol under off non winter, in
- dogowners preferred apply andseasonruletime to daylight a during savings (last
usybetween and 6pm 7pm aon summer weekend the review, the local board has the delegated duty to consider the provision of of provision the consider to duty delegated the has board local the review, the - le - - - leash ashareas.
leash atall times beach and foreshore areas. Statement of Proposal Statement
- controlon dog owners preferred under control on control under preferred owners dog
-
dog own dog - leash between 9am and 10am and between 5pm and 7pm and eitherand 7pm and 5pm betweenand 10am and between9am leash d
- leashbefore 9amand after 7pm - leash atall times rule. ers preferred dogs to be prohibited between 10am and 5pm, 5pm, and 10am between prohibited be to dogs preferred ers
undayin April) (34
rvey: ool holidays) (29 per cent) or 1 December (29 December 1 or cent) per (29 holidays) ool
- leash. –
- - - - 42 per42 cent) dog owners consider beaches consider owners dog are beaches consider owners dog are beaches consider owners dog are beaches consider owners dog
- - es bten 0m n 5pm and 10am between leash leash at leash
all times except before except times all - lea sh rule.
r r wasTe Piha,
Page Page
are 140
59. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
was that: r Feedback o comfort andunder the control on safety public for providing as well as wildlife of protection the support to hr ae o diinl infcn aes f ocrs n ec ad oehr areas foreshore and beach on regardingwildlife. concerns of areas significant additional no are there possible where should Conservation dogaccessrules and regionalpark rules rules access dog includedin the relevantsection of report)this an areas foreshore and on beach control above the under to adjacent parks local of majority the for o o o o o appropriate: off control under an and beaches following the on are there o o o o o o theon follow on undercontrol the comfort publicsafetysupportand to o o o o o o
WarnerPark Beach HerringsBay FosterBay from Takaranga Reserve) accessible also Arm at Reserve, of beach edge (small northern Beach Duck Davies Bay SwansonBay SandysParade Beach OtitoriBay (French Bay) FletcherBay and Tokoroa (between Esplanade TaumatareaPoint) Taumatarea to adjacent area Beach Beach adjacentto Okewa Reserve Wood Bay TitirangiBeach entrancethrough headlandto northof Park Warner Sou Little Huia Beach Huia BayMain Beach Estuaryarea at Parau ArmourBay
eceived from Auckland Council parks, animal management and biodiversity staff biodiversity and management animal parks, Council Auckland from eceived h iiag/anhl: l etaie ra ot o Tmrk Reserve Tamariki of north area estuarine All Titirangi/Laingholm: th
no known issues of public safety and comfort or particular wildlife concerns wildlife particular or comfort and safety public of issues known no -
Statement of Proposal Statement
ing beaches ing due to generalhigher usage:
-
es rl i cniee aporae tee eomnain are recommendations (these appropriate considered is rule leash
- leash ruleshouldbe retainedon the followingbeaches:
u Bay our
o o o o
Oatoru Bay Perkins Bays and entrance to from TamarikiReserve at area Point beach including Laingholm from Beach Titirangi/Laingholm: South JenkinsBay
opeet xsig eatet of Department existing complement - leash at all times rule is considered is rule times all at leash
- leash rule should be retained be shouldleash rule
Page Page 141
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog Options in relationto localbeaches May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar Option 3 Option and safety public comfortand wildlife concerns. address to beaches 13 remaining on control under the retain Would defaultto the on subject currently beaches nine following the on times off control under allowed be would Dogs Effectof change 2 Option and beach local identified 22 all foreshore areasin the local area.board on rule on default the leash retain would option This change. No Effectof change Option comfortand wildlife concerns: and safety public address to beaches seven following unde the retain Would Effectof change beaches. off control under and season and (staff recommendation). contro under an apply localbeaches. 1 Option Warner Park Beach Park Warner Bay Herrings Bay Foster (sm Beach Duck Bay Davies Wood Bay Wood Beach Titirangi north area estuarine All Titirangi/Laingholm: South Beach Little Huia Beach Main Bay Huia Parau at area Estuary Bay Armour accessible from from also Reserve) Takaranga accessible Reserve, Bay northern Armour of edge at beach north of Warner Park Park Warner north of headland to through entrance Reserve Tamariki of
retain the current default on default current the retain retain the on the retain apply a mix of under control on control under of mix a apply
-
leash rule.
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
all all l off l -
cnrl on control r leash rule on 13 beaches and beaches 13 on rule leash
-
leash rule to nine beaches nine to rule leash
Bay Oatoru Bays Perkins South Bay Jenkins d from Tamariki Reserve Reserve from Tamariki entrance at including area beach and to Laingholm Point from Beach Titirangi/Laingholm:
- leash rules to local to rules leash - - es rl o the on rule leash es rl o the on rule leash
- leash rule on all on rule leash
- - es a all at leash leash, time leash,
- Advantages Disadvantages Advantages AdvantagesD and Advantages Disadvantages etr rvds o off for provides better higher public 13 beachesuse on of comfort and level safety existing retains seven the on for wildlife beaches ofco provide of protection to continues dog restrict owners meetingfrom theirneeds. unnecessarily may the for provisions protectionof wildlife. broader and comfort safety public for provision broader potnte fr os n their and ownersnineon beaches. dogs for opportunities off provides identified at busytimes comfort and season safety and public for provides better time beaches, proposed on balance dog ownersand non of preferences a the season between provides and time beaches, proposed on the for beaches ofconcern provide protectio to continues non proposed off on comfort and safety provi not may dog preferredaccess by of dog owners level the provide not may nine on beaches. opportunities access - es bahs rfre by preferred beaches leash - dogowners. o wllf o seven on wildlife of n
- de the level of public of level the de ncern es dg access dog leash isadvantages -
dog owners
- es dog leash
Page Page
142
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog 66. 65. 64. 63. dogaccess ruleDefault 62. 61. Staffrecommendation 60. Would apply the following time and season rule on the on rule season and time following the apply Would Option ec ad oehr aes itd eo ta are that below listed areas currentlysubject defaultto the on foreshore and beach ninebeaches identifiedin Option2. apply Would Under control 4pm to10am Weekend) Labour before Friday until April Winter (1 Prohibited 7pm to10am 3 until Weekend (Labour Summer
Swanson Bay Swanson Beach Parade Sandys Bay) Bay (French Otitori Bay Fletcher Esplanade Taumatarea to adjacent area Beach Reserve to Okewa adjacent Beach Thereasons for this recommendationare thatthis option: lea on default current the retain to recommend Staff of comfort and safety the for providenon not or owners dog on t restrictive too of be adoption either the would as option practicable reasonably a be to region the of use The have been identified by parks staff to be substantially inaccessible to the public, including public, the to inaccessible substantially be to staff parks by identified been have 230individualThere are in local the parks sectionsthose ofthe documents and not repeated here. a discussed are beaches Piha and Henga/Bethells Te to adjacent parks The leash dogaccessis appropriate. off control under where areas those identify to seeks review The Auckland. central in areas on control under default A rule. leash off default the replace to intends board local The offcontrol under is area Board Local Ranges Waitākere the in areas park for rule default current The (between Tokoroa and Taumatarea Point) Taumatarea and Tokoroa (between
sh rule ninebeachesto (Option2): - dogowners. provides a simple set of dog access rules to support understanding and compliance and understandingthat balances needs the dog of ownersand non support to rules access dog of set simple a provides the requests formore off supp which areas beach nine on owners their and dogs of needs the for provides higher13 use local beaches non by sought levelthe to comfort and publicsafety providesfor better maintains current the levels protection of forwildlife
on n ne cnrl off control under an - leash.
-
leash -
Statement of Proposal Statement
- – wide standard summer beach times and season was not considered not was season and times beach summer standard wide Under control Under control after and 4pm 10am Before Under control after and 7pm 10am Before
local and sportslocal and
- 1 March) 1 leash rule: -
- leash areaswithin local the areaboard
es rl o the on rule leash
off off
- - - leash leash leash rule currently applies in five other local board local other five in applies currently rule leash
WaitākereRanges Local Board area. these,Of 88 parks
- - leash rule and apply an under control off control under an apply and rule leash leash rule with a default under control on control under default a with rule leash
Disadvantages AdvantagesD and - dogowners.
the community. the for confusing be may rules of mix off provide byowners dog preferred level not the to opportunities does non proposed off on comfort and safety public of level the provide not may
- es bahs rfre by preferred beaches leash - e tnad ie ad season and times standard he dogowners
isadvantages
- dog owners on owners dog nd analysed in in analysed nd Page Page - leash
orts 143 - - -
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog 72. 71. 70. 69. 68. Communityand staff views 67. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
parks (parkswith Kauridieback concerns identified and with#): a biodiversity management, animal tha was parks, staff biosecurity Council wildlife Auckland comfort, from received and Feedback safety public to regard having protection,and prevention providedof was staff from Feedback off March control underin be to park Park the of area Parrs grass the preferred cent) at per (67 respondents 31 Karnival 2015, Kauri the at undertaken survey the to respondents 46 Of theOf 193 responsesin online the survey about Park. focussed Communityviews parks. local on dogs for place in be rulesshould theyofconsider whatsort relation to in views weresought staff Communityand subject not to this review. sp and playground any of vicinity the in leash a on undercontrol dogs requirement keep to and the surfaces playgroundssports andon dogs of region that noted is It excludedanyfrom furt havebeen park.These the location, topographyvegetationand/orof the dueowners, to dog - leash. Alex MemorialJenkins Inaka Esplanade Huia Domain HerringsCove Harold MoodyReserve GlenEden Picnic Ground GillEsplanade BayFrench Reserve BayFrench Esplanade FosterStrand FosterBay Reserve Duck Park Davies BayReserve # ClaudeAble Reserve CeramcoPark BillHaresnape # Walk MuddyBig Landing Creek Arapito ForeshoreReserve AramaReserve control on control non of cent per 50 Ceramco of Park to underbe control off centper 67of dogowners andper 29 cent of non on control ce per 49 Parrs of Park to underbe control off centper 67of dogowners andper 28 cent of non
- - t f non of nt - leash leash
Statement of Proposal Statement
-
wide rules continue to apply on all parks. This includes the prohibition the includes This parks. all on apply to continue rules wide heranalysis.
- t an under control on control under an t
dog owners pr owners dog -
d
o onr peerd h gas ra f ar Pr t b under be to Park Parrs of area grass the preferred owners dog
kauri dieback. kauri
eferred the grass area of Ceramco Park to be under be to Park Ceramco of area grass the eferred - leash
- leash - w trg Bsn Reserve Basin Storage Sw South TitirangiReserve SoldiersMemorial Reserve SingerPark SeibelScenic Rese SeibelPark SandysParade RahuiKahika Reserve PihaSouth Road Reserve PihaEsplanade Reserve PihaDomain EsplanadePaturoa OtitoriReserve ReserveOpou Opanuku MarginalStrip Reserve Okewa ReserveBeach & Okewa Rese PihaNorth Strand PihaNorth Esplanade leash rule should be applied to the following the to applied be should rule leash
ParrsPark and Ceramco Park orts surface when in use. These rules are rules These use. in whensurface orts
- - dog owners dog preferred the area grass owners dog preferred the area grass
rve #
on Parrs Park and Ceramco and Park Parrs on
rve #
:
-
119 Page Page 144
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog a n seii cnen wi concernsprotection. specific no had animalmanagementand staffreview, identifiedin parks 60parksremaining the the for offcontrol pr to to the followingparks: off and on of mix a comfort and safety public support to TeHenga WarnerPark Scenic TamarikiReserve Reserve Swanson ParrsPark Owen'sGreen MtAtkinson Park Kaurilands Domain ArmourBay Reserve Park o o o o o o o o o
LaingholmHall Reserve LaingholmDrive Esplanade MihaRoad Reserve Marama Plantation Reserve # Mahoe Wal Little MuddyCreek Little Huia Beach LibraryLane/Glen Eden Walkway Les Park Waygood ovide for the needs of dogs and their owners the following parks should be under under be should parks following the owners their and dogs of needs the for ovide GlenEden Depot Clayburn Reserve AnnisonGreen Maywood Reserve LevyReserve KowhaiReserve KotingaReserve Kitewaho R GlucinaReserve
- - leash:
Statement of Proposal Statement
k # k
eserve
leash. off path by bordered south in area Grass Remainderof reserve off area Grass Comments SeeTeHenga section ofdocumentthis on park beachoffadjacentarea to Grass Grassarea off Grassarea off Grassarea off and fencing.Remainder park of on Laingrange Place and Tcc Laingfield off accessible Area Grassarea off
h ead t pbi sft ad ofr o wildlife or comfort and safety public to regards th
-
- off leash. -
leash. Area is defined through vegetationthrough defined is Area leash.
immediately adjacent to beach on beach to adjacent immediately Glendale Road
- - - - o o o o o o o o o leash,remainder ofpark on leash,remainder ofpark on leash,remainder ofpark on leash,remainder ofpark
Wood BayReserve WaitoruReserve # Titirangi Memorial War # TitirangiBeach TaumatareaEsplanade # TasmanView Esplanade Esplanade Takaranga Reserve Stream Res Swanson Woodfern Reserve WithersReserve WestviewReserve Waitākere Memorial War Park TangiwaiReserve SunvuePark ProspectPark Oratia HallReserve MilanReserve - etr cre o rsre and reserve of corner western erve # - es, eane o pr on park of remainder leash, - leash.
- leash rules should be applied be should rules leash
-
leash,remainderof - leash.
on
- - - -
leash. leash. leash. leash. - leash.
Page Page - 145
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog Options in relationto localparks May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar Option 2 Option No change. Option Definedarea of parks: Allarea:park partor of the following identified parks: off control under retain Would inaccessible parks thatare currently off generally 88 and parks local accessible on The Effectof change and87 list specific off Effectof change localparks. 1 Option Swanson Scenic Scenic Reserve Swanson Park Parrs Green Owen's Park Mt Atkinson Domain Kaurilands Bay Reserve Armour Park Maywood Reserve Maywood Reserve Levy Reserve Kowhai Reserve Kotinga Reserve Kitewaho Reserve Glucina Depot Eden Glen Reserve Clayburn Annis
- rule leash
on Green change the default rule for parks to on to parks for rule default the change retain the current default off default current the retain
would apply to approximately 55 55 approximately to apply would
- Grass areaoff Grass areaoff Grass Tcc Place Laingrange and Laingfield off accessible Area area Grass leash off path by bordered and reserve of i area Grass off reserve on beach to adjacent immediately area Grass Off
- Statement of Proposal Statement
leashareas. - leash area
- Woodfern Reserve Woodfern Reserve Withers Re Westview Park Memorial War Waitākere Reserve Tangiwai Park Sunvue Park Prospect Reserve Oratia Hall Milan Reserve leash (143in total) - d - leash dog access on all on access dog leash leash -
leash, remainder of of remainder leash, n south n
- -
leash leash
-
serve
leash rule on all on rule leash
-
western corner corner western
- leash -
Advantages Disadvantages Advantages AdvantagesDisadvantages and Disadvantages rvds o pbi sft and safety public for on provides default a specifying offcontrol under taken that be may dogs certain where less is including kauridieback Plans, he Area Local in expressed concerns wildlife and habitat general support not does comfortissues raisedby staff and safety publicsupport not does to where take dog.their decide to owners dog provi aey n cmot o yet not comfort experienced. public and of safety issues new incurring off listed the of usage increase may in ownerstheir of needs the decrease for provide adequately not may and dogs for a off for opportunities provides to Option3. compared owners their of and needs dogs the for provides better off easiertounderstand control prov areas under listing including of kauridieback Plans, spread the prevent to helping Area in expressed Local and concerns habitat wildlife supports generally comfort pn t peet h sra of spread the prevent to lping - es prs y o owners dog by parks leash des maximum opportunity for opportunity maximum des
- leash. ides for certainty and is and certainty for ides
- es rl better rule leash
-
es access leash
dogs and dogs Page Page -
leash
146
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog 74. 73. Staffrecom Same as Option 2, except that the 60 parks identified parks 60 the that except 2, Option as Same Effectof change 3 Option Option ofr o wllf poeto ae mte fo the parks would be203. from omitted are u protection and wildlife safety or public to comfort regards with concerns specific no having as staff management animal and parks by off specific 27 recommendation). list and parks (seeAttachment G). off control under retain Would Te Henga Park Henga Te Park Warner R Tamariki dr oto off control nder
Thereasons for this recommendationare thatthis option: applycontrolunderan off on control under an to parks for rule default the change to recommend Staff
change the default rule for parks to on to parks for rule default the change iseasier understandto and communicate. provides for greatercertainty dog for owners significantlysupports generalhabitat and wildlife concernsin thelocal board area significantlyincreases the currentlevel publicof safety and comfort eserve mendation
- es ls. oa nme o on of number Total list. leash
- See Te Henga section Henga See Te off leash beach to adjacent area Grass areaoff Grass
Statement of Proposal Statement
- leash rule 27to specific parks or areas of parks (Option 3): -
- es o 6 additional 60 on leash leash - leash
ra (staff areas
- - leash leash
-
Advantages AdvantagesDisadvantages and Disadvantages itn udr oto off control is and certainty for provides areas under listing wildlife spread the of kauridieback h andincluding Plans, Area Local supportsin expressed habitatconcerns strongly general more parks on default of number larger by leash areas 2 off listed of Option number the reducing than comfort safety and public for provides better aey n cmot o yet not thatOption extent 2). greater comfort a (to experienced public and of safety issues new incurring off listed the of usage increase may their that and 2)Option extent greater dogs a (to of owners needs the for provide not may and dogs for off for opportunities in decrease significant a provides easiertounderstand.
- es prs y o owners dog by parks leash
elping to prevent to elping - - leash rule and rule leash es access leash
Page Page
- - leash leash
147 -
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog Options forpicnic and fitnessapparatus areas, bushwalks and protected areas wildlife 79. 78. 77. viewsStaff 76. 75. bushwalks protected apparatus and areas, areas wildlife Clari May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar No change to rules Option1 Option 2 Option rtce wllf rls (staff rules and wildlife bushwalk recommendation). apparatus, protected fitness Effectof change
fication of confusing and ambiguous dog access rules rules access dog ambiguous and confusing of fication Feedback received from Auckland Council biodiversity staff and the attendees of the the of attendees in the outlined been has relevant andsection(s) of this document. 2015 March staff in held workshop biodiversity group resident Council and environmental Auckland from received Feedback Feedbackreceived from Au Staffviews weresoughtin relation to therelevance andappropriatenessof the current rules. None of theseterms are defined. topicareas: the general cover abovefour that rules of hasa mix area localRanges boardThe Waitākere
retain current the rules. generalrule is not required. of part meaningful more kauriissuesanddieback kauri have decisions informed onaccess whole the dog on or is not required rule general the document this in elsewhere for provided as park a of part meaningful d informed have the concerns document, wildlife this in elsewhere for provided as park generalrule is not required a of or part whole, the meaningful on access more dog on decisions informed has bushwalks of existence the a justify that size meaningful a of are are that or specificdogaccess rule, the boundaries ground’ the have ‘on that viewed apparatus when fitness seen or easily areas picnic local no are there District,and ‘picnicon areas’ in the former City. Waitākere on control under be to required are dogs protectedwildlife species’ of ‘habitats in and City’ Waitākere former the in apparatus’ fitness contain that ‘areas prohibiare dogs revoke general picnic area, area, picnic general revoke
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
ted from ‘designated public picnic areas’ in the former Rodney District, former the in areas’publicpicnic ‘designated from ted d
ckland Councilckland parks and animal managementwasstaff that:
a park as provided for elsewhere in this document, the the document, this in elsewhere for provided as park a
general general rule isnot required
AdvantagesDisadvantages and
Disadvantages Advantages Disadvantages Advantages csos n o acs o te hl o more or whole the on access dog on ecisions none. removes confusingand ambiguous rules. wid not known, well easilyenforced. not are communicated,easily not communicated, and not rules the practice best is rules specific location with areas protected wildlife and bushwalks general the replacing WaitākereRanges LocalBoard area arethere no known fitnessapparatus areasin the none. -
es o bswls n t in bushwalks on leash
–
inc n fitness and picnic e omr Rodney former he
Page Page
the the 148 ely ely
81. 80. Staffrecommendation May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog H G F E D C B A No. Attachments 87. Implementation Issues 86. 85. Impact Maori Statement 84. Board andViews Local Implications Consideration 83. 82. steps Next
beaches, on beaches, specific on wildlife protect to rules (e.g. area wider the for rules specific location gene effect. Removes practical minimal a have Would Effectof change
MāoriPlan for Tāmaki Makaurau. In this instance, impactsno have beenidentified. Maori to significance of areas in access dog Managing Theviews otherof local haveboards notbeen sought. notified for submissions ofas part dog the registratio publicly be will boards) local other from proposals with (together proposal of statement The reflectthe option selected bylocal the board. c proposed on decision the Following and bushwalk apparatus, Thereasons for this recommendationar fitness area, picnic general the protectedwildlife arearules (Option2). revoke to recommend Staff There are no implementation issues associated with this decision to adopt a statement of statement a adopt proposal. to decision this with associated issues implementation no are There a Marae, on access dog determineownership, and ensuring theprotection of sensitive ecologicalareas. to iwi the to of related 2015 March ability in held Hui a at representatives Whenua Mana from Feedback to provideto a more user friendly suite of rules. rules access dog Board Local Ranges Waitākere all of simplification the to contributes removes currentconfusing and ambiguous rules
- leash rule onparks). busy
Pihaand North Piha Option3 Map Pihaand Piha 1Option map TeHenga/Bethells Option3 Map TeHen TeHenga 1Option map Decision Statementof Proposal Title
ral rules and relies on on relies and rules ral
-
ga/Bethells Option2 Map Statement of Proposal Statement
-
making framework NorthPiha Option2 Map
-
currentdog accessrules
-
currentdog accessrules
hanges, staff will update the statement of proposal to to proposal of statement the update will staff hanges,
e thatthis option:
n processin June 2015.
ou o cnrl rsosbe dog responsible control, on focus
can help achieve outcomes of the of outcomes achieve help can
Page Page Pag 199 197 195 193 191 189 183 151 149 e
Item 20 Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog Authorisers Authors Signatories I May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
Whau Glenn Boyd KatarainaMaki Paul Wilson ShireenMund ofList Parks
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
- -
Relationship ManagerHenderson Team LeaderTeam Bylaws ay - d
GM
-
PolicyAnalyst -
Community& Social Policy
- Massey, Ranges,Waitakere
Page Page 201 150
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 151
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 152
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 153
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 154
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 155
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 156
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 157
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 158
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 159
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 160
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 161
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 162
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 163
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 164
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 165
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 166
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 167
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 168
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 169
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 170
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 171
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 172
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 173
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 174
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 175
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 176
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 177
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 178
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 179
Attachment A Item 20 Attachment A Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 180
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 181
Attachment A Item 20
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 183
Attachment B Item 20 Attachment B Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 184
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 185
Attachment B Item 20 Attachment B Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boar
-
Statement of Proposal Statement d
Page Page 186
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 187
Attachment B Item 20
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog Ihumoana Island, Korau Ihumoana and and
Erangi Erangi Points Off - leash -
Statement of Proposal Statement
Off On
- - leash between leash sunset andsunrise leash leash Te Henga (Bethells Beach) On Current dog access rules between sunrise sunset and - leash leash
Te Henga Recreation Recreation Henga Te Reserve Waitakere Bay Waitakere On Off Dogs prohibited - - leash leash (DoC leash leash
Reserve
)
Te Henga Park Park Henga Te Off Te Henga Park Park Henga Te area - leash
–
dunes Off - leash leash Page Page
–
grass area 189
Item 20 Attachment C
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 191
Attachment D Item 20
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 193
Attachment E Item 20
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement Current dog accessCurrent dog rules
Piha/North Piha Piha/North
Page Page 195
Attachment F Item 20 Attachment F Item 20 Review Rules Access Dog May14 2015 Wai tākereRanges Local Board
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 196
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 197
Attachment G Item 20
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 199
Attachment H Item 20
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Review Rules Access Dog
-
Statement of Proposal Statement
Page Page 201
Attachment I Item 20
2. ExecutiveSum 1. Purpose FileNo.: ManukauHarbour Forum Work Programme for 2015/2016 May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work a) That the Recommendation/s 6. 5. 4. 3.
Resolution numberMHFJC/2015/ programme, work the of year second the on resolved recommending thatmember boards: forum the meeting, April 13 its At Julyits 2014resolution. work cos overall a lower in result the would which option an of recommend with to resolved plan forum year communication the and the costings, of detailed second 2 year for the options three that with provided been estimated subsequently work 2014 the ( July of 14 programme year of resolution first forum’s the The for programme funding work allocated the Board of Local programme. year Ranges first Waitakere the the of funding ci were for (2014/2015) recommendations forum’s The communications the plan(see Attachments Band C). and hui researchprogramme, sites flagship the of comprised is programmework The years.programme work this for funding contribute boards member nine forum’s the 2013 Plan Action Harbour Manukau the on deliver to programme work a on resolved forum) (the Forum Harbour Manukau the 2014, July 14 of meeting its At plan. The fullreport isappended as Attachment A. communication its including programme, work 2015/2016 forum’s the for funding requesting boardsmembernine all to ManukauForumHarbour the recommendations of the forward To uprs h rqet rm h Mnku abu Frm n are o allocate to agree and proceed. Forum Harbour to 2015/2016 Manukau for programme work Forum’s Harbour Manukau the enable the to $11,889 from request the Supports board per cost option the 2 of the communications planis incorrectly in stated Attachment A as being$12,300. that noted be should It year. 2015/2016 the for $11,889 to board member per cost overall the brings communication the of 2 with option programme work the of 2 year fund board member that recommendation forum’s The d) c) b) a) MOVEDb
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
CP2015/07192
That the Manukau Harbour Forum recommends option 2 for year 2 of the the of 2 year for 2 option recommends Forum Harbour communicationand activation planfor recommendationto member boards for funding. Manukau the That be funding that boards member allocatedto support a flags to recommends Forum Harbour Work Manukau on the That Update the in information the notes Programmereport. Forum Harbour Manukau the That
ThatManukau the Harbour Forum thank officers f y Membery BM Graham,seconded by Member D Wrightson:
0521) ol cs $580 e mme bad Te ou has forum The board. member per $15,800 cost would 2015/2016) mary t to member boards for the 2015/2016 work programme than estimated in estimated than programme work 2015/2016 the for boards member to t
rculated to member boards in August 2014. All member boards except boards member All 2014. August in boards member to rculated
hipprogramme sites andresearch huiin 2015/2016. 1
or attendance.their
f h wr porme with programme work the of - 2015, recommending that recommending 2015,
for the three the for Page Page
203
Item 21 Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work Authorisers Authors Signatories C B A No. Attachments May14 2015 Wai
tākereRanges Local Board
Whau Glenn Boyd VictoriaVillaraza MaryBinney CommunicationsPlan Flagship SitesUpdate Programmeand Communications Plan onReport to Manukau the Har Title
- -
Relationship ManagerHenderson
LocalBoard Advisor -
Relationship Manager
bourForum on the 2015/2016 Work
-
Maungakiekie
- Massey, Ranges,Waitakere - Tamaki
Page Page Page 223 211 205 204
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 205
Attachment A Item 21 Attachment A Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 206
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 207
Attachment A Item 21 Attachment A Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 208
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 209
Attachment A Item 21
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 211
Attachment B Item 21 Attachment B Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 212
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 213
Attachment B Item 21 Attachment B Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 214
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 215
Attachment B Item 21 Attachment B Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 216
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 217
Attachment B Item 21 Attachment B Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 218
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 219
Attachment B Item 21 Attachment B Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 220
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 221
Attachment B Item 21 Attachment B Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 222
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 223
Attachment C Item 21 Attachment C Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 224
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work
Page Page 225
Attachment C Item 21 Attachment C Item 21 Harbour Forum Manukau for Programme 2015/2016 Work May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Page Page 226
ExecutiveSummary 2. 1. Purpose FileNo.: December2014 WaitakereRanges Local Board Community Fees andCharges May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Communi 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3.
h smay n tahet . tahet sos h nme o ssin boe by booked sessions of number the shows D Attachment C. Attachment in summary the f venue per charges and fees of table a For please refer Attachmentto B. the July, wereand there cancellationsno 1and For regularto hirers,list relatedcharges. the of fees full After Hall. Memorial War Titirangid council and Centre Function Park Ceramco area: council two are There including boards, local six although framework Waitākere the Ranges, chose tovary from the recommended fees and charges. adopted boards local All 2014. and July fairness 1 ensure help would which charges, al for introduced be wereto users, alltransparency for and fees New principles. practice good two to a over developed was refer framework) (the Please 2014. Framework July Fee ‘Hire council’s 1 The on introduced fees hire new the AttachmentA forthe fee schedule 2014/2015. for of impact the consider memb 2015, March 16 On Torecommend community facilities hire fees for the2015/2016 year. t significantimpact of the newand chargesfees thatwere introduced on1 forJuly 2014. area board local the council from data revenue and usage the present To h cnelto cag a apid hr aporae hs a gety epd o record to helped greatlymoreaccurate utilisation and visitornumbers than in previousyea has This appropriate. where applied was charge cancellation the council the of most in spaces factors: Mitigating by increased revenue and cent) per (+10 40,000 to $11,198,nearly halfas much more than same the period for2013/2014. 36,000 from increased Ove (pp). numbers points percentage four by increased facilities these of six this Over refer to the glossary of terms(Attachment E) for moreinformation o figures some that Pleasepercentage(%). a shown as are while percentagepoints(pp),others note as reported are Please period. December to July the for area Board Local Ranges the in facilities the of both of activity combined the summarises below table The activitytype.
CP2015/07264
Utilisation id not receive any enquiries from the 15 regular hirers across both of the venues the of both across hirers regular 15 the from enquiries any receive not id +4 (pp)
- month period, utilisation (booked hours divided by 10 available hours per day) per hours available 10 by divided hours (booked utilisation period, month
In July 2014, a new process was introduced to book the the book to introduced was process new a 2014, July In
- +3,637 (+10%) managed community facilities In the Waitākere Ranges Local Board Local Ranges Waitākere the In facilities community managed Visitors ers of the Waitākere Ranges Local Board met at a workshop to workshop a at met Board Local Ranges Waitākere the of ers
e eid Jl t 3 Dcme 21 ad o ihih any highlight to and 2014 December 31 to July 1 period he ty Fees and Charges ty and Charges Fees
- managed community facilities across the region and to ensure to and region the across communityfacilities managed
–
For Hire of Auckland Co Auckland of Hire For +$11,198 (+44%) +$11,198 - year period from 2012 from period year or the July to December period, please refer to refer please period, December to July the or - Revenue
July toJuly December 2014
l council facilities across the region onregion the across councilfacilities l
- aae cmuiy aiiis within facilities community managed
uncil’s Community Facilities’ Community uncil’s rs.
te ae eid visitor period, same the r - n percentage points. 2014 and was based on on based was and 2014
-
July to Waitākere
available Page Page
227
Item 22 Item 22 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community and Charges Fees 14. 13. 12. 11. Comments b) a That the Recommendation/s 10. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board )
showsnumber the of sessionsbooked by activity type. for the July Decemberto period, please referto the summaryin AttachmentC. Attachment D points percentage as reported are graphs while(pp), followingare others shown a percentage as (%).For a table of and fees charges pervenu the in figures some that note Please Summaryutilisation, of visits and revenue by local board area Att to referplease hirers,regular of list full the For charges.and fees to related cancellations no regularhirers across both venuesin the LocalBoard Ranges Waitākere area wereand there 201 December to July the In to refer Please 2014. July 1 ofImpact implementing newand chargesfees on introduced fees hire new the AttachmentA forthe fee schedule 2014/2015. for of impact the transparent consider accountable, Wa the of members 2015, lawfulness, March 16 On management, and public published good (openness),value for money,integrity and fairness. or principles: recorded were w practice the interests that to their pursue benefits arrangements to many people provides for hire places affordable safe, legacy to ‘access of that acknowledged range wide the ov developed was framework) (the Framework Fee ‘Hire council’s The reports. council of performance the the on updates regular provide to staff council Requests using the facilities. hirers existing and new all apply willto and AttachmentAper as year,2015/2016 the for uninflated, remain, will fees hire facilities community 2014/2015 the that Agrees framework, the in imbedded principles practice good the including fairness allto users. reflects and facilities these the for increase to expected is facilities community from revenue year, financial 2014/2015 the For
achmentB. Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
atkr Rne Lcl or. hs ol hl cnrbt t te aneac of maintenance the to contribute help could This Board. Local Ranges Waitākere
- managed community facilities as part of the quarterly quarterly the of part as facilities community managed 4 period, the council did not receive any enquiries from the 15 the from enquiries any receive not did council the period, 4
dr omnt… Te rmwr icue tee good these included framework The community…’ ider
er a two a er –
For Hire of Auckland Council’s Community Facilities’ Community Council’s Auckland of Hire For itākere Ranges Local Board met at a workshop to workshop a at met Board Local Ranges itākere - year period from 2012 from period year -
July toJuly December 2014
impact of the hire fees and fees hire the of impact
- 2014. It took account of account took It 2014. Page Page 228 e
15. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Communi 19. 18. 17. 16.
WaitākereRanges LocalBoard point percentage four a was average The percentagepoints. ten to change no from ranged which council board’s local the of Both WaitākereRanges LocalBoard below. facilities, Hal Memorial Titirangi both at War spaces available the book to introduced was process new a 2014, July In Highlights increases. isin This per same the with compared when cent per 10 by council two board’s local the to Visitors
increasewhen comparedwith thesame six
hc hs ral hle t ipoe efrac, s hw i te w graphs two the in shown as performance, improve to helped greatly has which
ad eac Pr. hs a eald oe sr t acs these access to users more enabled has This Park. Ceramco and l - linewith thehigher utilisation and revenueboth of facilities. ty Fees and Charges ty and Charges Fees – – -
managed facilities increased their utilisation hours overall, hours utilisation their increased facilities managed utilisation hoursbooked Visits -
managed community facilities increased on average on increased facilities community managed -
July toJuly December 2014 - monthperiod last year. iod last year, with both facilities reporting facilities both with year, last iod
Page Page 229
Item 22 Item 22 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community and Charges Fees 21. 20. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
periodlast year. are there show which below, graphs two the in reflected is processs booking new the via MemorialHall TitirangiWar to access Improved slightlyincreased. HallMemorial Hall Memorial War Titirangi
reported a 10 percentage point increase in utilisation while visits to the centre the to visits while utilisation in increase point percentage 10 a reported
: Compared with the same period last year, year, last period same the with Compared -
July toJuly December 2014 oe ies hn oprd ih h same the with compared when hirers more
Titirangi War War Titirangi Page Page 230
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Communi 22.
Revenue
ty Fees and Charges ty and Charges Fees -
July toJuly December 2014
Page Page
231
Item 22 Item 22 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community and Charges Fees E D C B A No. A 29. Implementation 28. impact Māori statement 27. 26. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideration 25. 24. Summary 23. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
ttachments
Therecommendations in this reportdo not triggerthe Auckland CouncilSignificance Policy. aimsit to clearbe and transparent to all users, including Maori. charand fees The Board’s Local Ranges Waitākere the within authorityrelating to local recreation, fall sportand community facilities. report this within recommendations The shoppedwork with membersof the co new the of impact The framework, the in imbedded principles practice good the including fairness allto users. reflects and facilities these Loc Ranges Waitākere the for increase to expected is facilities community from revenue year, financial 2014/2015 the For a half nearly is which much more than same the period for2013/2014. $11,198, increased revenue and 40,000 to six 36,000 same from theincreased Over (pp). points percentage four increased in council the of both of activity combined the summarises below table The by paid fees the in increase an customers,and a tighter chargingof cancellation fees. or fee higher a paying those to types customer in change in is year,whichperiodsamelastboardearnedlocal revenue when withcompared the more The
atkr Rne Lcl or ae fr h Jl t Dcme 21 pro. Utilisation period. 2014 December to July the for area Board Local Ranges Waitākere -
ie ih h icesd tlt. n diin icesd eeu i also is revenue increased addition, In utility. increased the with line
+4 (pp) Utilisation Glossaryof teams RangesWaitakere andfees charges Sessionbooked by activity type Summary of feesand charges data July ofList regular Hirers for WaitakereRanges Fee Schdule 2014 for 2015 RangesWaitakere Title
ges framework is not specifically targeted for MaoriHowever,populations. specifically for not targeted is framework ges
+3,637 (+10%) mmunity facilities fees and charges introduced on 1 July 2014 was 2014 July 1 on introduced charges and fees facilities mmunity Visitors
l or. hs ol hl cnrbt t te aneac of maintenance the to contribute help could This Board. al
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board on 16 March2015.
+$11,198 (+44%) +$11,198 - Revenue
July toJuly December 2014
-
D
ecember2014
- ot pro, iio numbers visitor period, month
- managed fa managed iey u t a to due likely Page Page
cilities Page 243 241 239 237 235 232
s
Authorisers Authors Signator May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Communi
ies
Whau Glenn Boyd GrahamBodman Kat Teirney
- -
Team LeaderTeam Relationship ManagerHenderson
- ty Fees and Charges ty and Charges Fees
Manager – -
CommunityFacilities, South CommunityDevelopment, Arts and Culture -
July toJuly December 2014 - Massey, Ranges,Waitakere
Page Page 233
Item 22
Waitakere Ranges Attachment FeeA: schedule fo May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community and Charges Fees Community Houses and Centres Facility Category
Titirangi War Ceramco ParkFunction Centre Facility Name
Memorial Hall
-
July toJuly December 2014
r 2014/2015
Main Hall Main Hall Room
$ $ 39.00 $ 32.00 Peak Standard as of as of July1 2014 Hourly rate
$ $ 31.20 $ 25.60 Page Page Standard Off
- Peak 235
Attachment A Item 22
Aerobic Fu Kung Kids Do Kwon Titirangi Trust School Steiner Rudulf Arts Martial Titirangi Academy Drama Zumba Titiran Area Inc Waitemata Society Plunket RNZ The Hall WarMemorial Titirangi incouncil hirers regular of List B Attachment May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community and Charges Fees In PORSE Hou Limited Timata College St Dominics Probu Combined ministries in Rock the Honey Fu Kung Arts Healing Centre Function Park Ceramco gi Community House House Community gi
- Home Childcare Home
s of Glen Eden Eden Glen of s
-
School Holiday programme Holiday School
-
managed facilities in the Waitakere Ranges Local Board area Local Board Ranges Waitakere in the facilities managed
-
July toJuly December 2014
Page Page 237
Attachment B Item 22
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community and Charges Fees
-
July toJuly December 2014
Page Page 239
Attachment C Item 22
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Communi
ty Fees and Charges ty and Charges Fees -
July toJuly December 2014
Page Page 241
Attachment D Item 22
2014 December Board community fees RangesWaitakere Local facilities charges and AttachmentGlossary E: ofterms May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community and Charges Fees O U R H C B V P
Visits Utilisation Revenue Regular hirer Percentagepoints Peakutilisation Peak peak Off Hirer Casualhirer Bookings
Term
Note: Community ofNumber people attendinga bookable space at a percentagepoint movements. AllNote: comparison reporting in utilisation ispresentedas Bookedhours divided available10 by per hoursday. accountingpurposes i what(Not is reported as revenuemanagement for Refersto revenue as reported in the financialaccounts. with otherbusiness use of the term. definition This is forthis analysisonly,and may not conform Note: networkofCommunity Facilities mana An entitythathas made sixmoreor bookings across the reportedas percentages. increases ordecreases (e.g. visitor numbers or revenue) are woulda be percentage ten pointincrease. Volume centper increase. put To init the rightcontext mean centper to fortyper cent thatcould bestated in error as a25 context.right measureslike utilisation the so changes be can two percentagesaon 100 percent scale. i It Apercentage point(pp) representst hours. Bookedhours during peak times / Totalavailable peak Discountnotusually applied. Accordingto the 2014/2015 fees Discountrates applied Accordingto the 2014/2015 and fees chargesschedule. relate to morethan one booking. Theentity who isparty to the rental contract. Acontract may conformwith otherbus definition This is forthis this analysis only,and may not Note: year. network the ofCommunity Facilities managedby CDACper Groupor individual whomadehas 5 or less bookings across ofNumber sl attendeeof a bookable space arenot included People attending the facility onlyto up pick or drop an off facilitynotare included CommunityFacilities events thatdon'tuse inside the of a
Centre orVenue Hire for in anyone session. ots/sessionsbooked by a hirer Forexample, if utilisation increased from thirty -
July toJuly December 2014 .e. omnibusin the reports)
inessuse of the term.
Definition
and chargesschedule.
hedifference between
ged by ged CDAC.
sused for
– putinto the
July to
- based s it s
Page Page
243
Attachment E Item 22 Attachment E Item 22 Local Board Ranges Waitakere Community and Charges Fees May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Aperson iscounted as a visitor more oncethan perday o o
per day.per Visitmore onethan Community Facility address differentbooking theyIf leave andreturnto the facilityuse for of a -
July toJuly December
2014
Page Page
244
2. ExecutiveSummary 1. Purpose FileNo.: DevelopingtheEmpowered Communities Approach May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board the EmpoweredDeveloping Communities Approach 15. 14. 13. 12. 11. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3.
capacity and capability, increase diverse community input into the work of council, catalyse council, of work the into input community diverse increase capability, and capacity comm build boards, local support to are model operating new the of functions key The Committeein April 2015. Policy and Strategy Regional the and boards local to reported was approach proposed The willchange,wh what identifies approach The Aucklanders. for Enabling outcomes Communities: improved Empoweredin resulting of Council principle the by guided is approach proposed The t on Momoho (April2014). builds approach proposed The a view embeddingto thisway working of across thecouncil family. withempowerment,community and local on focus greater a have to deliveryservice its shift fo model operating new a establish will ECA The activities. community supports and services delivers council way to the approach empowering and effective more new, a develop to is ECA the of purpose The is Division Operations the leadingthe development of ECA, w of Department Culture and Arts Development, Community The empoweredcommunity approach workto the of Auckland Council. Pro Mayor’s The reported Regionalto the Strategyand Policy Committee 4on June 2015. be will Resolutions feedback. formal provide to Board Local Ranges Waitakere the enables provides report This t to attached either is meeting that from Feedback 2015. May 4 on is meeting PAG final The Communityand council consultationstaff alsohas informed the approach. Political boards: local from input workshops.board following the by (PAG), informed Group been Advisory has ECA the date To council’sto community development approach are ofsignificant interest tolocal boards. The boards. local foc of a include all role plans board the local of heart the at is engagement and development Community savingsin the2015/2016 financialyear. Ared issues communitypractice hub and Auckland community complex the address brokers, community as local called: provisionally well are components as These Auckland. across plans board local of delivery the tog support which components and three of consist board will model operating local proposed The achieve to practices development fro communitygoverningbody aspirations andoutcomes. shift using to a communities, be will There in wayswhich empowercommunities. work to organisation the of capacity the build and council of whole the across approach the hisreport, or where localboard meetingsare early in May,will tabledbeat the meeting.
CP2015/07396 uctionin thecost to deliver community development over time isexpected,starting with
at councilat will anddo enabling ways working.of posal for the Long Term Plan 2015 Plan Term Long the for posal
and (ECA), Approach Communities Empowered the on update an
two chairs and portfolio holders’ workshops and individual local local individual and workshops holders’ portfolio and chairs two
h Cmuiy eeomn ad aey CS ui wih will which unit (CDS) Safety and Development Community the r
m delivering community development activities directly to to directly activities development community delivering m us on developing strong communities. Proposed changes Proposed communities. strong developing on us ith support Localfrom Board Services andothers. -
- NextSteps e hiig omnte Ato Pa Nā Hapori Ngā Plan Action Communities Thriving he wideresponse.
- 2025 (LTP) includes developing a more a developingincludes (LTP) 2025
-
Next Steps
ether will better better will ether
Page Page
unity
24 5
Item 23 Item 23 Developing 23. Theoperatingnew model 22. 21. 20. 19. 18. Background Comments a) That the Recommendation/s 17. 16. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
ciiis o ht vr opruiy o cucl o ok n as ht r ealn of enabling are that ways in develop community work delivering from to shift a council be will for There and maximised. opportunity projects is communities board every local that to so assistance pro activities and to council expertise of parts support, other with development working on community be will unit new the for focus primary A providedattachment in 2. is information More 2015. April in Committee apprPolicy and This Strategy Regional the and working. boards of ways enabling and do will Council council what Enabling change, Communities: will what Empowered identifies approach The of Aucklanders. for outcomes principle improved in resulting the by guided is approach The a play could approach behaviours:develop, serve, collabo The Communities’. Enabling performance high four the in organisation the across practice best building in and role significant ‘Engaging area focus special implementationf an providesalso approach The Communitie operationala clear direction enableto implementation ofthe plan across council. Thriving the providing byactions and areas principles,focus the on life to bring will It 2014). (AprilMomoho builds approach proposed The a view embeddingto thisway working of across thecouncil family. will which unit greater a have to (CDS)deliveryservice its shift Safety and Development Community the for model operating new a establish will ECA The activities. community supports and services delivers council way the eff more new, a develop to is ECA the of purpose The community the development functionare: empoweredcommunity approach workto the of Auckland Council.proposed The changesto f ProposalMayor’s The Committeein June. Steps,consideration for ofas part the report tothe RegionalStrategy and Policy Makes resolutionson theproposed Empowered Communities Approach 2015. . ECA the Regionaltheon to reported willbe resolutions These resolutions make to Board Local Ranges Waitakere the enables report This council the across extended be will it evolvesfamily. and matures approach the as 2016 in and meet to implemented be will approach the December to July From June. of end the until now from roles and models on done be to work for is timeline transition The Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board: the Empowered Communities Approach
to move away from direct delivery (and therefore save overheads) and fund fund through and funding more allocating by them. overheads) role active more much save a play to therefore boards local for (and delivery direct from communitygroups to deliver more away move to to transitiondelivery a to more empowered community approach
or the Long Term Plan 2015 Plan Term Long the or
rate and rate achieve. -
NextSteps
focus on local and community empowerment, withempowerment,community and local on focus
ramework for the High PerformingCouncil’sHigh the for ramework Strategy and Policy Committee on 4 June 4 on PolicyCommittee andStrategy -
2025 (LTP) includes developing a more a developingincludes (LTP) 2025 ective and empowering approach to to approach empowering and ective Ato Pa Nā Hapori Ngā Plan Action s ah a rpre t local to reported was oach
–
local board needs needs board local Next
Page Page ment ment vide 246
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board the EmpoweredDeveloping Communities Approach 30. 29. 28. 27. 26. 25. 24.
board services teams. They will work alongside local board advisors to support and join up join and co support to advisors be board local alongside will work will They They teams. services board roles. strategic are brokers community local The issues communitypractice hub and Auckland community complex address broker community as local called: provisionally well are components as These Auckland. across plans board local of delivery the support T The key functionsof the newoperatingmodel are to: andboard governingbody aspirations. activitiescommunity directly communities, using to to development practices achieve to local infcn ad o cmlx sus ht ol bnft rm n l o Acln approa Auckland efficiency/effectiveness benefits. of all an from benefit deliversresponse regional a whereactivity andbarriers wouldprocessesand and systemsinternal that issues complex or and/ significant Auckland The capacityt some have will hub practice community The steps. next agree to staff and members board local with work will brokers community local the emerge, to start priorities community new If work a develop then will hub The p hub. practice community the from support for prioritiesare and way communities empowered more a in work to opportunities offer projects which provide also and com local The programmes participation and operationalsupport local for community brokers, local boards and across the council family. engagement inclusive work communities, will They bo management. local project the alongside and facilitation development, community including skills with practitioners expert of team dedicated a of consists hub practice community The local wi on based be will programme work outcomes.board The role willtailoredbe to meet localandboard broker’s community needsand they The community. the to resources more of work the rogrammeincorporating priorities acrossfrom localboards. he proposed operating model will consist of three components which together will better better will together which components three of consist will model operating proposed he llprovide into a portal councilthe community.for me te prah cos h woe f oni ad ul te aaiy f the of capacity the workto in waysempowerthat communities. build and council of whole the organisation across approach the embed increase diversecommunity inputinto work the of council build communitycapacity and capability supportthe council workto seamlessly together at local b
o supportwork emergingon issues if theylocalbecome board priorities.
all departments delivering on local board outcomes and will support devolving support will and outcomes board local on delivering departments all - munity brokers will work with the local board members and advisors to identify identify andto advisors members board local with the work willbrokersmunity wide response will be a team of people with specialist skills. They will work onpeoplewillofworkwithThey teamspecialistskills. a willwide be response
ard teams to deliver programmes and tools, capacity building for for building capacity tools, and programmes deliver to teams ard
-
- NextSteps
wideresponse.
oardlevel - oae aogie local alongside located
Page Page s, the s, 247 ch,
Item 23 Item 23 Developing 35. 34. 33. 32. 31. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
to council’sto community development approach are ofsignificant interest tolocal boards. The Propose communities. boards. strong developing local on focus of a include all role plans board the local of heart the at is engagement and development Community savingsin the2015/2016 financialyear. Areduction in thecost to deliver community dev which existing, could be and furtherdeveloped to empower communities. new both activities, and initiatives empowering of number a are There Theimpact of approach the willthat:be community account development communitycapacity and newlyfurther formed communities. to intoopportunities to capacity community taking developed well is there Auckland where around This needed resilience. and strength be capacity, will responses Different the Empowered Communities Approach the empowered the commu communities have more access to resources and supportto do things forthemselves communitydevelopment practiceenhances theworkof whole the of thecouncil family localareboards able to access tailoredand strategic support
nities approachisembedded throughout the organisation. -
NextSteps
ag o rsoss il ed o oe toe areas those cover to need will responses of range
elopmentover time isexpected,starting with
d changes d Page Page
248
39. 38. 37. Po 36. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board the EmpoweredDeveloping Communities Approach 44 43. Consultationand engagement Committee St Regional Committee Budget Stage 42. ECAtimeline 41. 40. . litical Advisorylitical Group
Theremaining milestoneskey areshown the in table below. oftabling attachment meeti2. are boards local where PAG, this of timing the to due However, report.this to 2 attachment Mayforms 4 on meeting PAG the from Feedback Staffwill back report to thePAG 4on May with the following: outcomesare same the as communityaspirations. CommunityDevelopment andLocal Safety Boardor withinServices, and comment thatlocal located be should brokers There community local competencies. the whether cultural around havediscussion also to was staff for need the and Framework Responsiveness Māor the with relationship the consider to need the included PAG the from feedback Other theirAt meeting 16on April 2015the PAG supported: development the of the empowered communities approach. during staff to guidance and advice strategicprovided has (PAG) Group Advisory Political A RegionalStrategy and Policy onCommittee 4June 2015. the to reported be will This feedback. formal provide to opportunity the provides report This The pointskey fromthe consultation were: community of workshops around theregion. Staffwere also consulted. number limited a through consulted was community The
respond diversityto the Auckland’s of communities. a wholecouncil of approac capacitybuilding iscritical and a freshapproach isrequired one size doesnotall fit valuewhatcommunities bring tothe table a highuse trustmodel thatisvalues based toolsto support implementing theapproach. approach devolvingto resources revisedapproach and model brokers, community (local model operating new the of communitypractice hub and Auckland components three the the key functionsof the new unit rategy and Policy Policy and rategy
4 June 7 Date - 8 May h
-
NextSteps
- wideresponse).
for model operational CDS the and ECA Endorse budget CDS including 2015/2016 decisions budget LTP Purpose
ng early in May this will mean the mean will this May in early ng
- e, n saf run, staff and led, Page Page board 249
i
Item 23 Item 23 Developing 49. 48. 47. 46. 45. viewsBoard andLocal implications Consideration May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
There werealso recurringthemes fromearly discussions: Thesummary feedback thefrom chairs and portfolio holdersmeeting on 20 Aprilwas: localchairsboard and portfolio holders. workshopsfor twoat and April duringworkshops board local at informalfeedback provide to Localboards’ views formal through sought are this buildspaper. This ea on arose principles four following The from this meeting: March. 30 on ECA consider to met chairs board Local community in boards local pla plansboard 2014. led for community on focus role strong the active on builds ECA more much a provide to development. aims ECA The the Empowered Communities Approach h tasto poes a ucer n rie cnen oe dlvr i coming in delivery over concerns raised and unclear was process transition the need the to respond diverseto and disempowered communities issues systemic the tackle to Policycovercan Aucklandthese wide issues Social collaborate and Community and body governing can work the by funded be brokers to should issues Regional supported community be The local to could delegated boards is boards. development Local community as issues priorities. common on board collaboratively local deliver not will willan deliverteam wideAucklandresponse whatthe overuncertainty expertise the exists to deliver the hub services where unclear also was It community. the and council of areas other from resources up bottom A resources. for pitch to board havecommunity donotboards local the valuablehubwantto practiceservicesare but local with overlap the to but services board services local advisorroles needs to in be out explored sits bests contracted role broker with the those from continuum the communities withcapacity less to on take addition across and deliver boards local to tailored can is that continuum a on operate to needs role broker the delivermore resources to localboards wil model the how unclear was it Additionally, outcomes. improved achieve to budget the of utilisation better for desire also was There response. informed an make to able be to required are model proposed with the associated andcosts approach budget the and parties main the of engagement full ris planning, carry undertakenwithin timeframe a thatis feasible for significantchange theyto take place. careful but through opportunities always minimised are there change within current the needs beto carefully stagedand made appropriate foreach local board. to change any and approach an is empowermentCommunity risks. has which groups, channelli as simple as not is empowerment community communityempowerment approach and underfocus direction the of local the board. localoutcomesboard are communityoutcomes and beneedto central to and drive the commun empowerin turntheir canempoweredbethat needthemselvesthey to so boards local one size doesnotall fit months.
itiesa in way suits that area the
-
NextSteps
approach is preferred and the hub should also use use also should hub the and preferred is approach
alservices nn ad eeomn i te local the in development and nning
g ud truh community through funds ng
s hc cn be can which ks rlieropportunities d concern that itthat concern d Page Page
250
. l
51. 50. impact Māori statement May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board the EmpoweredDeveloping Communities Approach Authorisers Authors Signatories B A No. Attachments 55. Implementation 54. 53. 52.
council the across extended be will it family. evolves and matures approach the as 2016 in and needs board local meet to implemented be will approach the December to July From June. the until now from roles and models on done be to work for is timeline transition The Arepresentative thefrom IndependentMāori Statutory Board sitson the PAG. potentialimpacts. ma and mataawaka with Engagement and with Empowered participateengaged to embed the proposed approachto communities. be of can Māori the south how of examples the inform strong provide in environment, the help around project Making can Decision which to This Input underway Auckland. Māori initiatives the such of Approach number Community a are There moreempowe a to moving and settlements treaty and Māori for effectiveness economic social, cultural, of areas the in Māori with outcomes better enable to established been has Group Leadership delivers organisation the way includes the which services, in shift a out sets report this in described approach The enabling involvement.enhance systemsto and and improveprocess to capacity capabilityand the having with engaging is conside component means key which a communities, Organisation Performing High a be To Thesecond, and closely intertwined, isacting on the needsand aspirations of Māori. being first the activity; of sets areas key whichtwo out Framework, Responsiveness Māori the with relationship direct a has ECA The
the communities’ the priorities. t needs model the
Feedback PAGfrom meetingMay 4 2015 EmpoweredCommunities: Enabling C Title Whau Glenn Boyd KarenLyons HelenDodd
red communityred workingway of will help make progress in all these areas.
, and other activities being undertaken in partnership with Mana Whenau Whenau Mana with partnership in undertaken being activities other and ,
- -
- Relationship ManagerHenderson LocalBoard StrategicAdvisor
o focus on delivering local board priorities, which are the same as same the are which priorities, board local delivering on focus o Manager LocalBoar improving outcomes for Māori. The Council Māori Responsiveness Māori Council The Māori. for outcomes improving
ig n udrtnig ār nes n ise and issues and needs Māori understanding and ring -
NextSteps na whenua is ongoing to enable staff to understand to staff enable to ongoing is whenua na
understanding the rights and interests of Māori. of interests and rights the understanding d Services
ouncil
- Massey, Ranges,Waitakere
Page Page
end of of end Page 255 253
251
Item 23
Attachment1 May14 2 WaitākereRanges Local Board the EmpoweredDeveloping Communities Approach
Increase community capacity and capability building capability and capacity community Increase making place and led planning Sup delivered initiatives and designed more locally Support decision shape to communities local for opportunities Strengthen communities Māori strong building more to Contribute Sha investment Reprioritise re more control, accountability, responsibility accountability, re morecontrol, port community aspirations through community through aspirations community port potential to contribute to improved community outcomes community improved to contribute potential to other’s each and maximise up arejoined ways in that together working communities and Council d of all aspects influence to Māori support to practices engagement and participation Better wider community) their to connected and equality to committed competent, and (inclusive groups and community voluntary of capability and capacity Increased More bottom life community and in public participation and engagement meaningful for opportunities more have people of range A diverse about they care things and control of level in the increase An ecision 015
-
making and delivery and making What council do will - making and set the agenda the set and making - up design and delivery of local initiati local of delivery and up design
Empowered Communities
EmpoweredCommunities: Enabling Council
What change will influence that communities and local people have over over have people local and communities that influence -
NextSteps outcomes Improved Auckland
-
for
council across behaviour and approach Consistent attitudes enabling embed Cultivate and well Communicate experience through learn and risks take Be innovative, respons creative and flexible more Develop integrated ways and up morejoined in Work bureaucracy reduce and Remove barriers ves
-
Enabling Council
Enabling ways of working
es
Page Page
253
Attachment A Item 23
Theadjustments IndependentMāori Statutory Board member at the PAG meeting16April. communities approach andmodel. was This response in to feedback fromlocal boards and the theAt meetin Attachment 2 May14 2015 WaitākereRange the EmpoweredDeveloping Communities Approach Asummary of the pointskey raised in discussion 4at the May is: meeting Māoriresponsiveness isreflectedthroughout the empoweredcommunities approach and issuesand strategic relationships barriersto enabling communities, organisational capacity building and Auckland practicehub and a small scale enablinghub focusedaddressingon organisatio are components the of new the operatingmodel have beenadjusted. The threecomponents done. progressisbeing made theon Maori transformational shifts but there ismorework beto approach the needs coverto whole the of council wherest isthe throughthe budget and transitionissues recognition thatone size and onepacewill work not forall.More time isneededto work willhappen with the threeof parts the modelshown a desire to see moreresources released supportcouncil for to deliver empoweredan communities approach Planand Auckland Plan. operating model,with the newunitbeing
strategicbrokerage tailored eachto localboard andway operating, of a community
g, PAG g, received updatean reflecting adjustmentsto the overarching empowered
are: sLocal Board
rategicbroker role bestlocated Feedback from Political Advisory fromPolitical Feedback (PAG)May Group 4 2015
-
NextSteps
intolocal delivery with uncertaintyhowabout this responsive localpriorities,board to Māori the
nal - wide - wide Page Page
255
Attachment B Item 23
2. 1. Lo FileNo.: Chairperson'sReport May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ReportChairperson's 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3.
ng
- evn $.6 ilo. hs rpsl novs us o a Cr, hlfs moni Shellfish Care, Wai to cuts involves proposal This million. cut, is $1.56 activities, and engagement leaving environmental for budget the of quarter a or $508,000, support fo and schools in education environmental of out come to proposed is $712,000 example, For especiallyareasin the of environmental education andsupport for thecommunity. Infra The and fauna native our on vegetation flora doesnot seem haveto beenassessed. remove to proposal this of to birds impact for The places nest. providing and place feed only the be often will parks our so like, the and insects f available spaces green and trees of amount the reduce will Intensification birds. including fauna native for habitat providing in have would this effect negative the and lawn on strips muddy unsightly to edges. lead to tends and policy, management vegetation and weed Council’s the contradicts which sprays of use the increasing questioned I WRLB, the sprays more use to proposal cutting of instead the was us disturbed that budgets parks’ to cuts the Among and regionalparks budgets. environment parks, to cuts at concerned particularly was WRLB the reasonable, were these 3.5% a within keep to savings make to expected were which Council, of Department everyby made were budgets to cuts for proposals of serieswhole A of day, the thedecisions budgetson sit with the GoverningBody of Council. pr rating and funding of variety wide a discuss to days of period the on work been has months of couple past Long the over Board Local the for focus major A aaeet f oni fclte ad niomna cr. e rud t a counter was towa it argued moving We over care. was take environmental to Council and productive toreduce the investmentin upskillingand supporting communitiescommunit facilities the encouraging Council Council of that management the point involving the approach, Communities” made also We our and paringaway budgetsthatwere never very large in the first place. Board, the and Body parties. Local the BoardWhile isinvestingmore inarea, of the care the GoverningBody was partne Governing the that was the Body Governing between the to partnership message a is the Area of Stewardship Heritage vegetation. coastal and forest indigenous in covered 80% over is other and nativ any the of Unlike 42% Area. contains Heritage board our Ranges board, Waitakere Governingmainland the the with for as, responsibility WRLB, have the we to Body, important especially were highlighted we cuts The parks, regional 26 manage to budget Parks Regional showedofaboutcuts one millionann the that concerned also were We beenhas reinstated. one this that hope we protests, our After programme. the to contribute to not Zealand New o one Council the made have would That animals. and plants pest for Industry Primary for Ministry the in anymore part take CouncilwouldAuckland not which cutting,that would mean proposed for budg Control Biological National to contribution $158,000 Council’s the of whole The programme,an ex NeighbourhoodsSustainable $161,000 the of whole the and advice, and events Biosecurity TermPlan
CP2015/07402 - Term Plan. Chairs of local boards have recently met with the Governing Body over a a over Body Governing the with met recently have boards local of Chairs Plan. Term
The board also questioned the removal of shrubberies, especially native vegetation, native especially shrubberies, of removal the questioned also board The tutr ad niomna Srie Dprmn i fcn nmru cuts, numerous facing is Department Services Environmental and structure r r teachers,leaving a budget of $1.63 million,so nearly a third of budget the gone.
-
May 2015 turf edges, and a proposal to replace shrubberies with lawns. On behalf of behalf On lawns.with shrubberies replace to proposal a and edges, turf -
WCC programmeWCC mainly delivered in ourLocal Board area.
-
May2015
- led research programme to discover biological controls biological discover to programme research led uallyin capex both and opex.
si rqie cmimn rm both from commitment requires rship vgtto i te ukad region, Auckland the in vegetation e
rate increase. While some of some While increase. rate oposals, although at the end the at although oposals,
d a “Empowering an rds f only two councils in in councils two only f ies todo the job.
or birds, lizards, birds, or
Page Page et was et toring, 257
-
Item 25 Item 25 ReportChairperson's 20. 19. 18. 17. Paturoa RoadKauri resource consents 16. 15. 14. 13. 12. 11. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
h otoe f h Cucls nenl eiw il o o h Acln Development Auckland the to go will review internal Council’s the Committeein about a week’s time. of outcome The TheBoard hasbeen particularly pushinga for number of improvements including: wasIt intended not thatthe decisions themselves be revisited. intothe Council’s submission proposeon taken be should that points any were there the whether at look into also and processes, Council’sneeded improvements any were there if see to granted, were sites these from trees proce the into look to voted Committee Development follow the is attention our of top topic Another unhappy someif of the proposals being floatedare adopted. and at stage,this At arrived the Governing Body yet votehas to the rateson final policy, we but was amount this how about information more whetherit replaces user the for asked has Board The and collection rubbish weekly for contract new a negotiated has Council the because is area our in ratepayers for $34 of balance The bill. rates incorporated the into been has $23 user the and it, a to entitled is currently ratepayer every July is1 From collection. There collection. rubbish hard an for annual $23 of consists This $57. of increase an is which charges, management waste new on add A to inequity the compound will it and unfair, another$100. clearly is This receive. they service whatlevelmatterno of transport payingfor same the are AucklandratepayersCouncil,all of paid suburbs inner recei the those and suburbs, in outer than people more So received. people services of level the to publ aligned was any have not do who amalgamation, theyonly paidsmall contribution a transport,to and the transport rating policy Henga, Te and Piha Karekare, Huia, as such areas, outer the in ratepayers our of behalf on aggrieved particularly are We $485UAGC! low most a effect in is hurt levy,that $100 the $385. With at billstays rates the Change on AnnualGeneral will and regressive is levy flat a fixed as and income this about concerns of lot a have We additionalanbe $100flat levytransport. for be would increase rates of years the ten the across that 3.5% average an proposing with 2015/16 for was 2.5%, mayor the that heard we week last Late Ourpresentation to the GoverningBody isattached tothis report (attachment A) s well, we have learned that people in our board area will pay $81 on their rates with the the with rates their on $81 pay will area board our in people that learned have we well, s h ne t cery ae no con te eurmns f h Wiaee Ranges Waitakere the of requirements the account HeritageArea Act 2008 into take clearly to need The whetherhadit any effect, and what the community outcome of process the was. know they so representedfeedback, their about Boards Local to back advice provide to Boards need The Local said myself.But we arenot provided anysupportstaff carryto it out. Council Auckland Pr Greg by done is board our legislationin work This preferences. the the as role up this given setting are Boards Local applications. consent resource Loc for support provide to need The case the of Paturoa Rd, thiswas done. not decision the of part be should this as dieback, kauri of absence or presence the for areas living bush in sites on kauri assess to need The
-
May 2015
- income families. At the same time the mayor proposes that the Universal the that proposes mayor the time same the At families. income
- payswe currentlyhave.
whendecisions. making
d RMAchanges. ving no services, paid very little. Since the advent the Since little. very paid services, no ving
l ors n h ts o poiig edak on feedback providing of task the in Boards al - up to 40 and 42 Paturoa Road. The Auckland The Road. Paturoa 42 and 40 to up
s y hc te osns o remove to consents the which by ss
- making about removal of trees. In trees. of removalabout making
- as eie o hard for regime pays recycling and it will cost more. cost will it and recycling esland mainly, and sometimes and mainly, esland
c rnpr srie. Before services. transport ic
the plan, and there was to was there and plan, the
will very be
Page Page rubbish 258 -
23. 22. 21. Pest Management in the AreaHeritage May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ReportChairperson's a) That the Recommendation/s Chair,Waitakere Ranges Local Board Sandra Coney 30. 29. 28. 27. 26. 25. 24.
an education programme on climbing asparagus for private landowners at Piha and Huia, and Piha at landowners private for asparagus climbing on programme education an Trust Ecomatters with implementation, some starting already are We effortsour and slimresources at thepriority weeds andplaces. direct to us enable will This weeks. fewnext the in completed have to hope wewhich Board strategic a creating Council) Regional Auckland that (and before Council Auckland the in Biosecurity of Manager former the Craw, Jack have also We future. t was This project a joint between and the ForestWRLB and Bird and we hopepeople willfind control them,using manualmethods or herbicides. to how about providesinformation and the Waitakeres in plants pest worst 15 the nominates rece will Area Heritage the in households weeks, of couple last the Over findand sometimes out date. of to hard are materials resource Council’s the and beard, man’s old and ginger on past the in haveseen recently not anycampaigns We plants. pest to attention insufficient been has there but possums), about areas some in are pests underlargely control in the Waitakeres, (thoughwe believe moreneeds beto done Board Local the for agenda the on high very are Weeds orplants, new rules existing for pests. pest new nominate to time the also is It rules. specific with zones, management special as is there but strategy, old thezone under specialweedwillcontrol a process. interestis this in Waitakere a keen taking be we and Council, Regional Auckland the on was I while process RPMS last the chaired works a attended I Toms, Saffron With new the until strategy its reviewing Council in point approach was known. no was there so Act Biosecurity revising was the Government the that is delayed was it reason the but overdue, is review The 2007 Strategy Management Pest Regional The ReceivesChairperso the weedeg bins, flowerand seed heads. groundcover the and plectrant agapanthus asparagus, climbing ginger, serious especially has problems, Titirangi locals. weed for use constant in been quickly has this and Hall, McAndrew small a On highly are berries orange bright attractive tobirds who thespread them and far wide. and vegetation native smothers asparagus Climbing a programmehas to tackleasparagus climbing in new the Byers Block atPiha. par its on weed the controlling also is West Parks Sports and Local with theback he poster useful. It can be put on the wall, or kept folded up in a drawer,in reference the a for in up folded wall,kept or the on put becan useful.posterIt he Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
hus. It’s best if you can compost what you can, and only take what you have to the the to have you what take only and can, you what compost can you if best It’s hus.
-
- May 2015 oe w hv isald praet ed i i Ttrni od outside Road Titirangi in bin weed permanent a installed have we note, upof control those unablefor carryto outthis themselves.
n’sReport.
an opportunity to nominate areas with very high ecological values ecological high very with areas nominate to opportunity an
about particularabout as thesuchsuccessfulplants, efforts hop on the new Regional Pest Management Plan. I I Plan. Management Pest Regional new the on hop -
12 is being reviewed by Au by reviewed being is 12
. The advice we have is that animal that is have we advice The . weed management plan for the for plan management weed
ks and Regional Parks Regional and ks
contracted to roll out out roll to contracted
ive a poster which poster a ive ckland Council. ckland
Page Page 259
Item 25 Item 25 ReportChairperson's Authorisers Authors Signatories A No. Attachments May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Whau Glenn Boyd TuaViliamu WRLB_AdvocacyPresentation GoverningBody Title
-
May 2015
- –
Relationship ManagerHenderson DemocracyAdvisor
-
Masse y, Ranges,Waitakere Page Page Page 261 260
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Bo ReportChairperson's
-
May 2015
ard
Page Page 261
Attachment A Item 25 Attachment A Item 25 ReportChairperson's May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
-
May 2015
Page Page 262
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Bo ReportChairperson's
-
May 2015
ard
Page Page 263
Attachment A Item 25 Attachment A Item 25 ReportChairperson's May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
-
May 2015
Page Page 264
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Bo ReportChairperson's
-
May 2015
ard
Page Page 265
Attachment A Item 25 Attachment A Item 25 ReportChairperson's May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
-
May 2015
Page Page 266
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Bo ReportChairperson's
-
May 2015
ard
Page Page 267
Attachment A Item 25 Attachment A Item 25 ReportChairperson's May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
-
May 2015
Page Page 268
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Bo ReportChairperson's
-
May 2015
ard
Page Page 269
Attachment A Item 25
3. 2. 1. Purpose FileNo.: Portfolioupdate: MemberSandra Coney May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member SandraPortfolio Coney 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. PortfolioWW1 and Heritage ExecutiveSummary
West Auckland Historical Society have been meeting at the Local Board office to coordinate to office Board Local the at meeting been have SocietyHistorical Auckland West preced year the For area. Board our in occurred activities of number a Day Anzac to up leading days the In spoke I at the Waikumete Ceremonyandattach I my speech to this report (Attachment A). the what and means, day the what NewZealand andAustr on reflect to opportunity an and day, glorious a was It communityceremony at Waikumete and after that 2 the pm parade at Piha. th as role of my in MuseumChair Auckland at Cenotaph the at Ceremony Dawn the attended I teas. afternoonbreakfastsand at numbers big cateringfor and parades largeorganising job great lar Very Gallipoli. haveWe nowAnzac had the Daycommemorated that 100 the MemberConey leadhas portfoliosfor the ofHistoric Heritage/Character and Parks area. budgets, within area, projects portfolio agreed their overseeing activebeing advocates, accessingand providing informationand in concepts, development project policy developing and leading proposing for responsible are with holders update Portfolio an give to Coney Sandra Member for regardsto activity within portfher opportunity an provides report This h Ryl eiet f Z rilr a Ttrni a Mmra Hl o 1 Arl wih was which April, 19 on Hall Memorial attendedby about 150 people. War Titirangi at Artillery NZ of Regiment Royal the of Band the by concert a hosted Board Local The WW1. to went who area Titirangi the from dissome designed and on workshopsWW1 of number a providedLibraries and planactivities.
CP2015/07398
W1 ommrto Pltcl teig ru, hn tedd h 1 am 11 the attended then Group, Steering Political Commemoration WW1 e n, Ss Fins f akmt, irre, ak, eelgss n the and genealogists parks, libraries, Waikumete, of Friends RSAs, ing, ge crowds attended all our Anzac Day ceremonies and local RSAs did a did RSAs local and ceremonies Day Anzac our all attended crowds ge
alianweremen going throughon thatday 100 years ago.
olio areas.
th
anniversarythelandingof at advice.
plays about men men about plays
Page Page
271
Item 26 Item 26 Portfoli 14. 13. 12. 11. 10. 9. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
o update:o Member Sandra Coney from much children was by used and well peaceful is and walkway Primary,so it is goodto lovely have it made beautiful and safer. The very visited. who looked people all by It appreciated stood. once memorial the place the where at this installed and flax and Poppies Peace her of wreath large a made Cristina originally it what of photos like.looked Parks has also createda little showing gardenof native plants. and history the explaining sign a installed have parks Local location. its showingw ground the Titirangi on markings the are there whereand stood, originallywas memorial This Memorial installed. seat Soldiers’ a and Harbour the Manukau the restoring see to on made time some for been has viewshaft a removed, been have weeds working All Uru. Te opposite Titirangi, at Walkway been has Board Local The the at TitirangiRoundabout and atPiha, Peace Poppies lineddisplays theroute down the beach. were There RSA. Eden Glen the by crosses Remembrance of Fields white T felt red bright those displays, Poppy Peace poppiespeople that the sew,and Cristinathen installs themin public places. for responsible artist the is Beth Cristina old the curtains, net new for paid Board ones werestarting to f Local the and doors, sliding big the painted and clean, deep a it gave shabby, tad a looking was felt Board the which up, hall the spruce To The programme. the organised had who Davis,wasmusic followedby a l Bob was Ceremonies of Master the and Booth Stephen wasbandmaster The years. 150 its celebrated recently and 1864 in founded aftern wonderful a was This here were Peace Poppies outside the Glen Eden Library which had been put together with together put been had which Library Eden Glen the outside Poppies Peace werehere
all offtheir rails. Hall The is a lovelyone andit came wonderfully.up ovely afternoon tea,organised by Tracy Haggo.
oon of music by people at the top of their game. The Band was Band The game. their of top the at people by music of oon
Titirangi Page Page 272 ar
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member SandraPortfolio Coney 21. HuiaDomain Parks Portfolio 20. 19. 18. 17. 16. 15.
Another highlight of the WSA conference was learning about a beautiful poem by Katherine by poem beautiful a about learning was conference WSA the of highlight Another Waikumeteand descendants of his family and Starkie,war.Douglasafternameinis buriedexploitslifereal the “Starkie”, Stark,and his wives mothers, Sisterhood, Hyde’s Tw Robin Volunteer War. the nurses, recording writers as and members, WW1 in played role the women about presentations thoughtful many with day, stimulating very a was This 1. War Studi Women’s the at spoke I April 12 On told through the cemetery. a and Zealand New be can that stories important in the and created was cemetery it how understand people militaryhelp will history largest the is Waikumete cemetery. the of parts mili the of history the onhandbook a on Friends thewith working now is BoardLocal the and Oaks, the in Faith of Chapel the in DayAnzac displayson up put Waikumete of Friends h Bad s tl cnieigte praht te eiu eoin t ua oan I has It Domain. Huia at erosion seriousthere much the beenconcerning isso Boardspeculation, claims that for even outright the to approach the considering still is Board The site the of extent the on Transport and Auckland the repairs. haveWe nothear advise site, to needed scheduled experts was heritage some ford footbridge, the the contained as that requested Board Local baske gabion install to proposed was It Ford. Huia Little the at footbridge the repair to need the is matter heritage recent Another again.going tramways the getting for strategy a discuss to April, in night Friday a on RSA the at meeting I and Yates Denise Presland, Greg running. back them getting in interest public werehaltedby because ofWatercare health and safetyconcerns, but there isa greatdeal of o Part 1000 a the is This record withproject epidemic. theNew Zealand Society of genealogists. influenza will 1918 the which in died project who Cemetery a Waikumete in on buried Ancestry.com.aupeople with working been also have I servingin British the armyin which he Mansfield,written about herthe of deathadored brother Leslie, whowas while killedin WW1 f our heritageour Express we f Rain Forest is andthe have lost Tramway.Waitakere These
asot o Hell to Passport
dbackyet anon alternative repairproposal.
and
familylive West in Auckland. o te er Condemn Years the Nor
ts in the eroded side of the footbridge, however, the however, footbridge, the of side eroded the in ts had enlisted. es Association conference on Women and World World and Women on conference Association es o Nw eln’ get W bos are books WW1 great Zealand’s New of o
nvl aot ra soldier, real a about novels ,
attended a attended Page Page , about , tary 273
Item 26 Item 26 Portfoli 29. 28. 27. 26. 25. 24. 23. 22. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board o update:o Member Sandra Coney streamsdemonstrate whycoastalprocesses are called“dynamic”! have Christmas decen beforea are but lagoon large a forming up just joined again once separated were which Piha, at Wekatahi and Marawhara The asconcern storm events with largerainfall are whatcause erosion. c be not will work the like looks it and in Stream, works Piha control erosion the on made being is progress much not projects, parks other On duringwork thisweek. some place to planning is the Parks Local la and take accelerated has view, erosion the week, a last the with In those all hope We process. on opportunityto express it. consultation the through made feedback mad not has Board be the now, right But third can The project. the which wouldand it in for be competitionwith otherprojects acrossfrom the region. budget its feedback Council,the Bodyof Governing the from additional in funding seek to havewould it option, this $680,000 for has board conside cost to predicted is optioncommunity The out decision. a making now are board The willat this look as well feedback, viewother stakeholders,as the of as iwi,such in options www.shapeauc three The currentlyBoard the does not have preference. a understands Bo community the that the that important is It presented. also was option community the that sure made and meeting public second the organised we why was that ago, months this Boa the that claims hear April the to frustrating for been has it so community, the to concern a was Domain Huia the wrote of protection I column a In to viewstheir and considering all options. wewerelissubstantialshowedthisseawall.thoughtcommunitymore that and the We seawall the of extension and repair second a for out consulta take to team have Parks the asked had Board Board the March, 12 the on meeting its At against accusations such undermined), plate root continuedto be stated as on fact social media. its Grant half West, had Parks’ (which Sports c the and anderosion, causing were they because Local2014, in stones the of of Manager removal the ordered that him the was it that and matters operational were where these said Jennings, 120, about by mee public the attended after Even reason. same the for trees or tree a of removal the ordering and erosion, hasten been to beach has the from members, rocks removing deliberately board of accused individual named Including Board, The thinks. Board the what rge rocks on the beach to try and slow it down. The community will be informed of this of informed be will community The down. it slow and try to beach the on rocks rge
tion the two options presented at the end of last year last of end the at presented options two the tion ard cannot express preferences in the middle of a consultation. The fact is that is fact The consultation. a of middle the in preferences express cannot ard kland.co.nz
rd only realised this at the latest public meeting. Not so, we heard we so, Not meeting. public latest the at this realised only rd
untilMay.15
– anhl Roundabout Laingholm
and it had added the third community option, a higher a option, community third the added had it and a eiin ad ebr ae tl wiig o hear to waiting still are members and decision, a e
rably more than this. Were the Board to select to Board the Were this. than more rably
arried out before the winter, which is a is which winter, the before out arried t distance from the road. These road. the distancefrom t I lal akolde that acknowledged clearly I , –
managed realignment and realignment managed
utting back of the tree the of back utting
ting on 14 April, 14 on ting Page Page tening tening 274
Signatories A No. Attachments a) That the Recommendation/s May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member SandraPortfolio Coney Authorisers Authors
Receivesportfolio the update Memberfrom Sandra Coney
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
Whau Glenn Boyd TuaViliamu Anzac Title
Day2015
- –
Relationship ManagerHenderson DemocracyAdvisor
- Massey, Ranges,Waitakere
Page Page Page 277 275
Item 26
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member SandraPortfolio Coney
Page Page 277
Attachment A Item 26 Attachment A Item 26 update: Member Portfolio May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Sandra Coney
Page Page 278
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member SandraPortfolio Coney
Page Page 279
Attachment A Item 26 Attachment A Item 26 update: Member Portfolio May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Sandra Coney
Page Page 280
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member SandraPortfolio Coney
Page Page 281
Attachment A Item 26
3. 2. 1. Purpose FileNo.: Portfolioupdate: MemberDenise Y May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member DenisePortfolio Yates 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. Events ExecutiveSummary
eea Bad vns ok lc a pr o Eoet te month the Ecowest, of part as place sponsore Board The Trust. Environment Ecomatters by organised initiativesenvironmental took events Board Several spokebehalfon of the RangesWaitakere Local Board. Time the of opening the facilitating Capsule which hadbeenburiedyears 25 ago at the 75 and bands, the in students the introducing and knew, I whom of many pupils, t old various of introducing proudly Chairperson Turner as Gail Principal role and Trustees, his in Alofa Michael Council’s Auckland see to great was It Day. Centennial School Valley Henderson the attended I April 5 Sunday, Easter On were everyonewho attended! which of all community, the by incrediblyvaluablebringi in organised were which some and Council Auckland by organised were which of some April, of month the during events of number a attended I and Events. CommunityCulture, ArtsandportfoliosFaciliti of the lead for has MemberYates budgets, within projects p agreed their overseeing activebeing advocates, accessingand providing informationand inadvice. concepts, development project policy developing and leading proposing for responsible are holders Portfolio activityto within portfolio her areas. with regards update an giveto Member DeniseYatesprovides opportunityreport for an This around our area, including laying wreaths on behalf of the Board. Attendances were huge were Attendances Board. the of behalf on wreaths laying including area, our around services in participated and attended members Board all and time busy a was Day ANZAC Committeewhich ischairedby Chair,our with input from the TitirangiRSA. olderpeople rememberedour from schooldays. was This organisedby the CentennialWW1 we which of many items, other few a and songs WW1 old those all played band the as had the at ANZACs, the commemorating Tolle Concert Band Artillery an Stevemember Board fellowConey,and SandraChairperson Board withalong Hall, Titirangi attended I 19 April On attendedby Local Board members,including myself. a greatcommunity! What a School, werwhich of Community both Day,and the Prospect school, the at livenow bees that the local powhirifor the at both March, in events 2 the on closely followed event This haveyellow bright T the adopted have organisers and the community the that with report interact to to delighted continue am to plan I and event, new a as this into funds some put so and was that food hangi eating parents and socialising stage, grandparents, including Families day! entertainment a onproviding amazingfabulous kites, werethere,flying agesall of children What Eden. Glen Park, Prospect On Board Several April. 12 Sunday memberswere at Ecomatters and the Sustainable Living Centreon on theday. event the concluded EcoDay area. its our and environment in natural importance the promote to and Dieback Kauri highlight to Piha at walks a
CP2015/07400 rdy 7 pi Bad ebr tv Tletu ad atne te hnu a at Day Whanau the attended I and Tollestrup Steve member Board April 17 Friday strup. Former Local Board member Janet Clews was also in attendance. What fun we fun What attendance. in also was Clews Janet member Board Local Former strup.
- shirtswith as that their logo!
ng communitiesng wereclearlythoroughlyand together, enjoyedby
ates
- o -
th o unbelievingly delicious! The Board The delicious!unbelievingly o
Jubilee celebrations school. of the I - name ‘YZUP’ name og eerto of celebration long
rflo area, ortfolio es, Librarieses, e or of Board he Page Page -
they the 283 e d
Item 27 Item 27 update: Member DenisePortfolio Yates 19. 18. 17. 16. FACILITIES 15. 14. 13. 12. 11. ARTS May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Denise Yates Kia ora around displays their and people usingour visitorslibraries, and the regular programmes are well attended. of numbers great ha commemoration ANZAC enjoying been have Libraries Our reallyclean“deep” has made place the look so good! Anew willkitchen nextbe on list. the big the to Repairs see! embarrassment to an such were that ones tatty old the on improvement an such clean and fresh are windows Hall Titirangi at done work the with pleased very are We Usagenumbers of halls in ourarea are on increase, the both hasit raisedsome interesting aspects. at ofriskor being butsold,does it prohibit certain uses. are we sure canWe resolve but this, Cou a to vulnerable be not will property the that by ensures Act Reserves the use under Coverage up. match quite current not does community the their and Act Reserves the under coverage their where places 2 at looking complete,withnewalmost facilities is review of The wholookingare fora home. House Shadbolt ma are We Gallery’ Contemporary Waitakere Zealand’ Uru New featured. can fell justlyWe proud ofour achievement ‘Te there. ‘Art see new to a chuffed time really Every am I at. out look comes a magazine have and go to you urge I which Gallery Wes the at and House Lopdell Uru, Te at on exhibitions good very some are There Cenotaph the at Waikumete. big the on theirs placed people many Day ANZAC on and year, h I poppies, of Speaking spectacular. looked and artist, the of guidance poppies the under schools,felt at big including public, The the by made Titirangi.were at roundabout the on and Eden, Glen at library the outside daysleading the inwas created art reallylovelypublicSome signage at the“pointy end” ofLopdell House. lookstill weare and it, of front in parked cars noare there if road the from seen beUru, onlywhich can Te wallof front the on signage for at Uru Te to innotice put place.be I thatsome reallysmall letteringhas up gone an Laingholm at Boxes Utility the for waiting still are We Team. Arts the to access easy had not have we Leave Parental on off went Advisor Arts our Since earlieror and assisting people byhandingout programmes andcandles, etc. ther arriving by smoothly run event the make to helping cases, some in years for whichhavedonethey at Waikumete, Dawn Service the at werealsoSeveral events. the e
verywhere, and I feel I need to acknowledge Council staff who were involved in organising in involved were who staff Councilacknowledge to need I feel I and verywhere,
ig rges n h pa t set to plan the on progress king
-
more in due course, and we have not forgotten the Maori Writers group Writers Maori the forgotten not have we and course, due in more v nvr en o ay ope big on s hr wr this were there as worn being poppies many so seen never ave
ve been very popular. There is no reduction in the numbers of numbers the in reduction no is There popular. very been ve
ing forward to larger signage on the end wall of Te Uru, andUru, Te end wallof the on largersignage to forward ing
ncil or CCO with an eye to other uses for the place, the for uses other to eye an with CCO or ncil
curtains and new paint on the inside doors, and a and insidedoors, the on newcurtainspaintand
- p Wies n eiec porme at programme Residence in Writers a up
leases in place. However we have been Howeverbeen wehave place. inleases -
the new net curtains on the top the on curtains net new the
up to ANZAC Day, for exampleANZAC Day,for to up for for regularuse andcasualuse. d Oratia to be painted, and painted, be to Oratia d 100 numbers that were at were that numbers
e at 5 o’clock 5 at e Page Page t Coast t 284
Authors Signatories There are noattachments for this report. Attachments a) That the Recommendation/s May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member DenisePortfolio Yates Authorisers
Receivesportfolio the update from
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
Whau Glenn Boyd TuaViliamu
- –
Relationship ManagerHenderson DemocracyAdvisor
MemberDenise Yates.
-
Massey, Ranges,Waitakere Page Page 285
Item 27
3. 2. 1. Purpose FileNo.: Portfolioupdate: MemberGre May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member GregPortfolio Presland 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. ResourceManagement Issue beenhasIt a ratherbusy time lately. ExecutiveSummary
h icdn hs ihihe a ubr f rcs ise wih blee hud be should believe shouldanalysing be include I the following: inci the which of aspects issues troubling some process and of number a Council. by addressed highlighted has incident The down. hav could age whose Tree Kauri old magnificent a age comment. to compelled felt of fond opposition.and publicbacklash hugh a caused incausedsome Paturoa Kauri Tree publichave a seenresponse for I not dominated. have issues Management Resource MemberPresland haslead portfoliosfor the of Transportand Regulatory/P budgets, within projects agreed overseeing activebeing advocates, accessingand providing informationand inadvice. concepts, development project policy developing and leading proposing for responsible are with holders update Portfolio an give to Presland Greg Member for regardsto activity within hisportfolio areas. opportunity an provides report This ramn o te nr apiain o cnet o nrae auatrn otu and output manufacturing increase to consent industrial an for from dust application of the Inprodischarge is in the involved been of have I treatment that issue Management Resource significant second The discussionswith land the owner result inag an a had has tree The whohave I not thoughtof as radicals. direction of variety the is me intrigued really What
CP2015/07403
Whether the disposal requirements are adequate for an area that suffers from Kauri from dieback disease. suffers that area an for adequate are requirements disposal the Whether Why the treewas not checkedKauri for dieback. Why particularlythis magnificent Kauri did notenjoy special protection. no be to thought were Kauri morethan minor therebyavoiding particularthe need notify to the application. this felling of effects environmental the Why particu this Kauriwould survive. that so limited more not was clear to permission why and property on the bush of amount maximum the to close clear to allowed were landowners the why
if this was thought to be necessary. be to thought was this if
ap edn, t es fr now. for least at ending, happy
My concern is that the current Council review will not go far enough far go not will review Council current the that is concern My
g Presland
And she was right. was she And
ie iutd et or o h Hrtg Ae, n the in Area, Heritage the to door next situated site et a nt e addressed. be not may dent
people who showed up at the site ready to take to ready site the at up showed who people
reementthatwill protectthis particular tree.
These included people who I know well and and well know I who people included These
Even a former Prime Minister who I am veryam Primewho MinisterI former Evena
h ptnil eln o a of felling potential The
Care will be needed to ensure that that ensure to needed be will Care e been 500 years old should be cut be should old years 500 been e
It was barbaric that in this day and day this in that barbaric was It
ht tik Council think I What hi prflo area, portfolio their
time. lanning.
ahr majestic rather
The incident The
Page Page 287
lar
Item 28 Item 28 update: Member GregPortfolio Presland 14. 13. Transport 12. 11. 10. 9. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
to beto stronger than ever. surge. to continue will numbers passenger that likelyvery is it yet west arrivedout havingnot new trains these and with through rolled being with12monthspast rail the in 10% surged has patronage transport passenger news, transport of item further one And of city the harder than those living in theinnercity investigated. be p data and detection tax fuel regional for completed being infrastructureexpensive for need the avoids it a past, the in implemented that is preference board’s infrastructure. transport enhanced fund to motorways on tolls supporting 58% with through noware Plan Long Term its Council’son consultationthetransport response to relation to In local to early conveyed being information of thatlocal people have for the affection deep importance the as well as the environment their affecting directly action show about communities issues three All meas temporary situation. and scouring by exposed been application. consent a without RMA the of provisions emergency Huia. at Tr Pohutukawa a involves arisen has that issue RMA third The d) c) b) a) these: pollution occur. to no is have I takenthe unusual step powder perlite fine and these fearsbreathingare heightened by the proxi of effects health the at concerns local held deeply are There transitionedbe to move elsewhere. would it sure am existinglongrightsIsomeuseterm established if forfactoryprocessing not perlitebeand to Township. Waitakere to adjacent and school a by country, ln dns ak n ride and park Eden’s Glen
way that an already unacceptable situation should be made worse by allowing further allowing by worse made be should situation unacceptable already an that way h pooe ices i atvt wl hv a ef willtheaffect area. The provisions an theActof need tobe intotaken account. Emissions property. have the from road the across will is which of boundary activitythe Area Heritage in increase proposed The througha village andacross theroad afrom school will submit beI unacceptable. also but But anyincrease howwill toasoccur. dispute amany is understandvillage. I there the nuisance a only no increased in result also willactivity increased The not is powder of emission potentiallya health threat. allow To increasean inemissions should notoccur. the already that suggests the across and village a to next is factory The an allow To area. surrounding increase in the activity the acceptable.is not for character of out totally is activity existing The
My direct involvement in this is less as proposed action was to be taken under the under taken be to was action proposed as less is this in involvement direct My
not exist. not
Mysubmissi rocessing, and a motorway toll would tend to hit those living at the edge the at living those hit to would motorwaytend a toll rocessing,and
trips increasing 21%.trips The best thing that could occur for the area is for the factory the for is area the for occur could that thing best The
Waitakere Ranges Waitakere environment. a dpn o te nrae fnig en obtained. being funding increased the on depend may of filinga personal submissionopposing theapplication. There on stated that I opposed thatI application stated on includingthe reasons for
mity of the factoryto the school.
The case for the inner city rail link appea link rail city inner the for case The
area. With the introductionoftrainsnew electric the With ures have been taken to preserve the the preserve to taken been have ures
road from a school. Anecdotal evidence Anecdotal school. a from road
ise and truck movements throughmovements truck and ise et n h Wiaee Ranges Waitakere the on fect
This is a very odd place for a for place odd very a is This
ee situated on the foreshore the on situated ee
The roots of the tree have tree the of roots The
Such a tax has been been has tax a Such
Page Page
The 288
rs rs to
Authors Signatories There are noattachments for this report. Attachments a) That the Recommendation/s May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board update: Member GregPortfolio Presland Authorisers
Receivesportfolio the update Memberfrom Greg Presland.
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
Whau Glenn Boyd TuaViliamu
- –
Relationship ManagerHen DemocracyAdvisor
derson - Massey, Ranges,Waitakere
Page Page 289
Item 28
1. Purpose FileNo.: Conference Committee workshop(NAEAC) and 2015 Dune Restoration Trust Updateon member's attendance to the NationalAnimal Ethics Advisory May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee Authorisers Authors Signatories B A No. Attachments a) That the Recommendation/s 3. 2. Executivesummar
Restoration Conference Trust (attachmentB). AnimalEthicsAdvisory Committee workshop (attachment A) and 2015 Dune Receivesreports the Memberfrom Neil Henderson his attendance for to theNational of the Ranges Waitakere Local Board. f learnings and highlights outline will Henderson Member Waitakere the from representative the as RangesLocal Board. Conference Trust Restoration Dune 2015 and workshopAdvisoryCommittee EthicsAnimal National the attended HendersonNeil Member in March2015. heldNovember in 2014 and the2015Dune Restoration TrustConference which attended he RangesLocal Board on theNational Animal Ethics Advisory Committee workshop (NAEAC) For WaitakereRanges LocalBoard M
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
CP2015/07413
Henderson 2015Dune Restoration Conference updateWhitianga Henderson NationalAnimal EthicsAdvisory Committee update Titl Whau Glenn Boyd TuaViliamu
e
y
-
–
Relationship ManagerHenderson DemocracyAdvisor
emberNeil Henderson to reportback to the Waitakere
- rom the conference for the benefit the for conference the rom Massey, Ranges,Waitakere -
MemberNeil -
MemberNeil Page Page Page 301 293 291
Item 29
All three of us are the Territorial Authority representatives on our respective AEC groups and as and groups AEC respective our on representatives Authority Territorial the are us year, of three All last Wellington AEC. University Auckland in the representing Randall Simon and attended AEC Zoo Auckland the I on is who workshop NAEAC repre Committee the Ethics Animal on other two report alongside brief a is following The Introduction May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee 4. 3. 2. 1. or studies experimental that members, lay as observersand that theyconform to therequirements of Section 63 of the Animal Act. Welfare ourselves, non by understood clearly satisfy be to able are manipulations animal involve that to experiments is committees these specifically we such
National AnimalNational Ethics Advisory Committee (NAEAC)
Reporton NAEAC AnimalWorkshop for Ethics Committees (AEC)held in Wellington . . . . advice the to This committeehas been established under the Animal Act provideWelfare to independent of life, of be ait mouse, rat quality animalslaboratory the enhancing to way a asenrichment behaviour like experiences more positive on t focus to become how on emphasis an in to welfareway give to begun now that has animals animal laboratory extent of the assessments to and sophisticated change anaesthesia of techniques complexity, their in evolve Manipulations year. after year unchanged, off, ticked quietly and can that protocol static a not is Ethics Animal country)are invitedto attend. workshop whichto themembers of various AEC(ofwhich thereare around inforty the itsIn capacity to give advice AnimalEthics to Committees, NAEAC holds annualan at: welfare/naeac found be can summaries Meeting required. qua four holds NAEAC 1999. under found be can functions NAEAC’s of list full A the develo the advice AnimalEthics to Committees recommendationson therestrictions of use of non and teaching ethicaland animal welfare issues relating useto the ofanimals in research, testing
Auckland Council TerritorialMember ofOtsuka Diatranz AEC Attendedby Minister - meetings represent the interests of the Auckland public as lay people. Our function on function Our people. lay as public Auckland the of interests the represent pmentand reviewcodes of of ethical conduct
for Primary for Industries
or pig.or NeilHenderson, RangesWaitakere LocalBoard
rterly general meetings each year and special meetings when meetings special and year each meetings general rterly
11 November11 2014 e at mrl mnmlzn ngtv ipcs on impacts negative minimalizing merely past, he
about: be established once on a laboratory checklist laboratory a on once established be ettvs rm ukad oni: il Burril Bill Council: Auckland from sentatives
http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/regs/animal
section 63 section
- humanhominids
of the Animal Welfare Act Welfare Animal the of
- scie Page Page
ntific
293 -
Attachment A Item 29 Attachment A Item 29 Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. TheWorkshop 5. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
on realonsituations and outcomes. consideratiotheoretical ivorytower of result the simply not Modelis Domains hands practical, a is Mellor Professor earlier, example for around an costs time staff extra mean can care extra because implementation successful its around issues be will there and welfare animal to approach enlightened rather a is This enrich o waysand be implement to activelytoinvestigate but animal onan negativeof impact factors no to appears there that such ground minimum the cover to try to enough good not simply experimental establishe an is protocol when design weighting EQUAL get should considerations positive and negative both that considers now he that degree the to experiences), animals the enhance to do we do) to not what (i.e. statistics negative only not incorporated has development its time this over that is Mellor Prof from presentation the of crux the and years of number a over development in been has model Domains Five The suffer mental that such behaviour,outcome. affect adversely may that conditions those as well as temperature, and provision water food, as things basic such cover factors wide a These experimental protocol.an of whileunder life animal’s an onimpact that factorsof assessment range evolving an is model This considerations. welfare animal of Model” animalwelfare. laboratories.” This might give species. industryIn the he is known as “He whosmells the animal atfeed research .Hisexpertise isdiverse andhas he beeninvolved with studying conditions the of numerous decades ofwork dedicated to the unders Theworkshops Key Note speakerwas ProfessorDavid Mellorwho hadhas at least three KeyNoteSpeaker within andbetween these bodies. into look do separateoversight body whichto we could refer to.was This considered tosomething be to and notedthat fora number of us who were representing TerritorialAuthorities, therewas no of NAEC. the Sheoutlined for Theday was by started the opening address fromVirginia the Williams, IndependentChair advice on. some need might we that AEC’s own our within circumstances and situations line”, othernotandwayscompareeachto thinking, andmeet of changes whethertheyorindependentmembers are likeus industrynew of members, keepabreast to members, AEC individual allow to is workshop NEAC national the attending of purpose The Professor Mellor spoke at length on the development of what he calls the “Five Domains “Five the calls he what of development the on length at spoke Mellor Professor
renhance the animal’s quality of life whilein theircare.
wn thetrack as it mighthelp to developmore consistencyand understanding d potentially, the design of facilities to allow greater space for animals. As notedAs animals. spacefor greaterallow to facilities ofdesign potentially, the d
d. In a nut shell, the lead he gives to the industry is that it is it that is industry the to gives he lead the shell, nut a In d. someidea of hands the
usthe relationship between NAECand our respective AEC’S
tanding and improvementof laboratory animal care
but increasingly, positive statistics (i.e what can can what (i.e statistics positive increasingly, but - n esn s hs urn vso o te Five the of vision current his so person, on - onpractical approaches he takesto
es as well as explore“offas wellesas n mgt e an be might ing ns but is based is but ns Page Page 294
13. 11. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee 18. 17. 16. 15. ofResult MockAEC meeting 14. 12.
a good understanding of the issues and nuances of their own AEC meetings. In this respect this In meetings. AEC own their of nuances and issues the ofunderstanding good a r a in sit to able be to great was it with, begin To The groupswe weredivi near the in Hunuas the into future,this seemed rather topicaland well timed. 1080 deliver to Council Auckland by proposals recent of light abou animal. the on have might death prolonged a such discomfort and distress the assess to attempting fatal a deer a give to prov needed to particularlymore was but dose much how only not on data accurate get to attempt an in deer, captive of poisoning controlled a of results the measure accurately to trial a up set sign group, a wouldas whetherwe provided,decide were we that notes in presented as merits, its on based and proposal this discuss to groups thathad been put to an AECin t Thehighlight of the day’s workshop involved a theoretical consideration of proposala real TheMock AEC meeting: Welfareimplications of1080 poisoningin deer. fi of warrant a for around shopping like bit a seemed It passed. was proposal the team, study the to links had that AEC another to taken was it whenbut it, rejected also to sent been had proposalrejected the but the in similarlyotherthegroups that wasfound sessionit main theat again up when wemet Later, flaws many too just were there felt we implementto the three R’s thatsit at the core ofour work. as off sign it experimentaldesi give to unable were we When weattentionour brought specifically atmatterhand the to ,the mock 1080experiment, different quite were there that see to constitutes anexperimental “manipulation”. interesting was w on discussion good as well as It facilities of monitoring like issues to approaches interpretation. some are that to areas has also open meetings, AEC conduct we how around guidelines clear us gives which Act, WelfareAnimals the of 63 Section transparently. discussed be to matters,other edgier as well as tensions, these for opportunity an allow this like workshops and members also are a is who There Burril, Bill and Randall Simon from hear to Auckland CouncilReps. able being excellent was is h eprmn hd ei i ta tee s lot ohn, sd fo aedtl evidence anecdotal from aside nothing, almost is there that in merit had experiment The separate in up meet to present AEC’s various the of members for opportunity an was It tnessto me and theethics ofwas this discussed.
t how distressing it might be for a large animal like a deer to die from a fatal dose. In dose. fatal a from die to deer a like animal large a for be might it distressing how t TerritorialAuthorities. NZSPCAmembers NZVAnominees(veterinarians ) Institutionalmembers ( theindustry representatives on AEC) the
wy a eti dge o tnin ewe idsr mmes n independent and members industry between tension of degree certain a lways gn and too many inconsistencies around how the experimenters’proposedhow the inconsistenciesmany around and too gn
dedinto up were as follows
what was fascinating is that the originalisthat the whatwaswhich proposalAEC this fascinating to
he previoushe months. ide information on how long it would take to die as well as as well as die to take would it long how on information ide
oom with other Territorial members and get and membersTerritorial other with oom
off the proposal. The proposal aimed to to aimedproposal proposal.The the off
hat exactly hat Page Page 295
Attachment A Item 29 Attachment A Item 29 Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee 22. 21. 20. TheThree R’s 19. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
lo smls bt lo euig h sz o te nels ue! fl dsuso o the of discussion full A used! “needles” the technique for of size birds the handling reducing by also caused but distress samples, blood the reducing by Refinement, with helped definitely s the and R’s three the implement to ways news at look can researchers how discussed presentation Tamara’s 3. 2. 1. by described first 1959. were They testing. in animals The presentedbelow. novel and R’S field Three the left strikingly on presentation the for just if workshop, Dieschanimals,Tamarawasthespecificon procedure a reducingof impactthe approach to the of part favourite personal My subjectsOther at the included:Workshop acces synopses concise clear very having as well withpresentedconvenientlayandpapersproposals,alongrepresentativesall to to attached as AEC’s on reps independent and industry Furt meetings. into cut means no by were in elementsubjectivity wasadefinite of and driedand there could disagreement creepthat and involved were we processes the that fact the out brought also It
he Rs Three [1] distress,and enhance animal welfare for animals the used. Refinement animals. of number same the from information more obtain to or animals, fewer from information Reduction ispossible toachieve the samescientific aims. Replacement Th Euthanasia techniques Applying gradingsto wildlife species Statistics/Poweranalysis Monitoring s to furtherreading materialshould theyrequire it.
The3Rsare: e ThreeR’s
isincluded below, borrowed, with courtesyfrom Scientist“The website.“,
( 3Rs
: use of methods that enable researchers to obtain comparable levels of of levels comparable obtain to researchers enable that methods of use : –
ue f ehd ta alvae r iiie oeta pi, ufrn or suffering pain, potential minimize or alleviate that methods of use : Malcolm Tingle e dsuso o ti bogt p hns ie etn a od aac of balance good a getting like things up brought this of discussion her : preferred use of use preferred : - i rlto t sine r giig rnils o mr ehcl s of use ethical more for principles guiding are science to relation in ) Tamara DieschTamara
tandout was a technique for withdrawing blood from wild birds that that birds wild from blood withdrawing for technique a was tandout
- Craig Johnson – Tmr i wt MI n a otie f h Tre ’ is R’s Three the of outline an and MPI with is Tamara . PeterJohnstone
non
-
animal methods animal
. . . Russell S. M. W.
ove r animal methods whenever it whenevermethods animal r
and
. . Burch L. R.
Page Page 296
in in
By collaboratorsbitingin insects. requiresResearchers drawwork blood they that fromwhose findingare wildanimals unlikely Six TheScientist May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee [of levels baseline measure cannot one minutes, three within hormones].” them bleed to able not is one “If quickly”in stressed birds,says Christina Bauch,an ornithologistand Becker’s “Stress components. its and animals, blood the of anesthetize and restrain, capture, typicallyones wild especially researchers blood, collect to order In and loads, toxin and pathogen levels, hormone antibodytiters. counts, therapies cell other including data, or abundant drugs provide to reaction and their study ecology, to animals from physiology, samples blood draw often lab, the in and field the in both Biologists, insect bloodsucking and bats on seminar wildlife biologistChristian Voigtof Leibniz the Institute Zoo for and 2004 Research. Wildlife a in inspiration found Becker problem, this Sensitiveto data. his of that and health their betterfor the them, disturbs he with less the So pressure. works Germany, just Wilhelmshaven, Becker, weigh in him, can Research that Avian before animals of ornithologists Institute and the naturalists is base of home generations whose Like them. sample and tag, P BUGGINGTHE NEST: A bloodsucking bugpokes its head out ofa perforated dummyegg eter Becker, who studies the ecology of seabirds of ecology the studies who Becker, eter
Yao - Legged Syringes - Hua Hua Law
|
Sep Beckeruses to collect blood nestingfrom birds. . But the stress of this manipulation can dramatically alter the characteristics the alter dramatically can manipulation this of stress the But . tember 1, 2014 tember
ucs n hv dlct bns ht a bek ne vr slight very under break can that bones delicate have and ounces
- estv prmtr lk te omn criotrn rise corticosterone hormone the like parameters sensitive
in northwest Germany, traps birds to measure, to birds traps Germany, northwest in COURTESY OF CHRISTINA BAUCH CHRISTINA OF COURTESY Aayig hs smls can samples these Analyzing . — a setupa that ecologist Peter former PhDformer student.
Page Page
by s 297
Attachment A Item 29 Attachment A Item 29 Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee percent. 80 to rate success blood withsyringe a andthe blood isdrawn out“carefully a and slowly.” of abdomen swollen The easy.” is bugs the from blood “extracting com study to bugs the used also has who Bauch, says jar,” glass little a in [around] running bugs hundred a about see that to scary little a was “It to. used getting ( Alt terns common on design, egg the improve eggs to continuedupping has lab his And analysis. dummy for blood one tern Becker: enough collected says successful,” the were approaches first our “Even tested Mexico. Bauch using and Becker Soabandoned he the netting and simply added manylittle holes aroundthe eggs’circumference. fr away face sometimes would window this so however, nest, the in eggs their roll to tend Birds feed. could bugs the which windowthrough netted one had egg dummy initial Becker’s o avoid to enough heavy them making eggs, outeggs the made Nagel, Rolf colleague, the his Beckerand birds. mother suspicions of the arousing for design effective an definitel on settle will to had “It he First Becker. recalls idea,” great a is it works, breedingbirds less ifthan one needs to catchthem.” that if blood obtain thought to way “Igood a be samples. might eggs perforated hollow, in them hiding by nests into bugs also saliva s bug’s birds many Because The blood. draw to used typically syringes the anesthetizes the feeding site andpromotesblood flow. than smaller times 30 than the from collected be Assass then could blood The animals. the disturbingdistended abdomensof thebugsand analyzed lab.in the without wings bat from the of subfamily Triatominae. In1986, researchers demonstrated thatthese bugscould suckblood “kissing or assassinbloodsucking syringes: living to turned Voigt like researchers bat failed, strategies syringe and capture conventional When birds. than stress physiological to susceptible m even are problems These speciesof birds and mammals. Researchershave used triatomine bugs tocollect blood from more than40 May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
f epoxy f casting addingresin, weight by mixing bits of lead intothe shells. hough the bugs are proving helpful in collecting bird blood, collaborating with them takes some takes them with collaborating blood, bird collecting in helpful proving are bugs the hough
ieaoatr maximus Dipetalogaster in bugs easily outperform syringes. They have needle like mouthparts with diameters morediameters with mouthparts like needlehave syringes. They outperformeasily bugs in
pend vast amounts of time incubating eggs, Becker wondered if smuggling if wondered Becker eggs, incubating time of amounts vast pend r poone i bt, hc tn t b mr dlct ad more and delicate more be to tend which bats, in pronounced ore a assi bg pce ta i ntv t Baj to native is that species bug assassin an ,
COURTESY OF CHRISTINA BAUCH CHRISTINA OF COURTESY
mon swifts ( swifts mon
Apus apus Apus
- third of his initial trials trials initial his of third - fed bug is punctured is bug fed tra hirundo Sterna Clfri Sur, California a ). Fortunately, ). om the bird. the om disturb y Page Page ” bugs ” 298 ),
lo hs. Buh n hr olaus ae odce tlmr suis fr xml, which example, 280:20122540,2012 for studies, telomere conducted high have require colleagues microorganism materi her or genetic and the insect Bauch for probes host.” with “specific blood blood using by ingested discriminated” easily the be of “can sources contamination possible that adds Genta chemistry. ( bug with and syringes with collected blood rabbit It of Brazil. Cruz, Oswaldo Instituto Comparisonsdigested. fully be to of midgut the into move to blood ingested for weeks or Genta days takes Fernando physiologist insect explains crop begin, bug’s the blood from extracted is small it and dilution before bird, if a biting insect the undigested of hours several remains within bug the in blood ingested But blood. ra bugs with blood Collecting May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee http://www.the more questionson bug the method andhow great it is” than on study the itself, he says. are there conferences at “Sometimes distractions. unforeseen some caused has method the that dum using continue to happy is Becker during[their] next molt,” which would prevent the insects from spreadingin tropical regions. bugs the kills that factor a “for searching on focus scientists that suggests He agrees. Europe, in Ruhr of Schaub Günter They happen. could could becomenew vectorswhat fordiseases affecting wild animalsand humans.” knows [who] loose, get they “If birds. captive on i bugs triatomine birds used Max studies who the Germany, of Starnberg, Goymann in Wolfgang Ornithology says for Africa,” Institute to Planck bugs triatomine introduce to want not would “I in newecosystems. as used are insects region tropical in the field the in failure, heart cause can that withsyringescaptivetemperate mostlyin animalsregions.used Triatomine bugsbeenhave never infection chronic potentially fo a vectors are disease, bugs triatomine because But mammals. and total,researchersIn have usedtriatominebugsto collectbloodmore from speciesbirds 40 than of Gen Comp Endocr Comp Gen
- ult DA ape, sn br bod olce b titmn bg ( bugs triatomine by collected blood bird using samples, DNA quality
- s cientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/40845/title/Six
, 135:100 , ).
- Universität Bochum, Germany, who has supplied has who Germany, Bochum, Universität s outside of Latin America, to avoid the bugs establishing themselves establishing bugs the avoid to America, Latin of outside s - ises concern that bugs might alter the profile of the target species’ target the of profile the alter might bugs that concern ises 107, 2004 107,
my eggs in his long his in eggs my ), antibody titers ( titers antibody ),
s have revealed no differences in hormones in differences no revealed have s - J Wild Dis Wild J term bird studies, though he concedes he though studies, bird term te aaie ht ass Chagas causes that parasite the r - Legged , 42:466 , - nutrient absorp nutrient - triatomine bugs to labs to bugs triatomine Syringes/
n Tanzania and has has and Tanzania n - 69, 2006 69,
R o B Soc R P
), or blood or ), tion of the of tion l f the of al Page Page
299 ,
Attachment A Item 29
nte ,o oh rtc te hrln fo eoin s el s rvd ntrl akrp th backdrops natural provide as well as erosion from shoreline the protect both ,to another man larger alongside function formations dune smaller where Bethels Kare, Kare Piha, number host a to of important sand dune systems the Aucklandfor Region. are allWe with familiar is that coastline significant a has WRLB The Whitianga. at held conference, Annual Zealand New represent the WRLB be to fortunate was I yearMarch this In Introduction May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boa Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory Com dune andform function. coastaleffectivemethodscommunitiesmanagementpracticalauthorities and restore for naturalto the of t is work aim Our Network. the Vegetation Dune continue Coastal to 2007 in formed trust charitable incorporated an is Trust Dunes The our protecting there out folks enthusiastic of coast! thousands already the and us Help dunes. sand sa to agencies science and industry authorities, management iwi, communities, of experience and knowledge the together brings that organisation nationwide a is Trust Dunes The live between two worlds our th to for habitat backdrop and provideviews, picturesque they holidays, summer erosion, and hazards coastal lessen systems dune after, well looked If sea. the to barrier natural our are dunes Sand country. the in landscapes degraded most most the of one are environments coastal and dunes sand coastal Zealand’s “New TheDune Restoration TrustNewof Zealand website: their From Trustof New Zealand of ispart this new approach. more softer, being and are dynamics approaches fearsome restrained marine often these around increased has understanding our however, recently More roads. or sites house precious save and tracks its in sea the halt will the in it, at concrete and rocks throw simply to been often has dynamics beach of flow and ebb regular the to responses our past, Cornwallis the In bay, beach. LaingholmHuia and at are these of Examples environment. natural the with contact our enrich
Reporton Dune Restoration TrustConference:
” –
and Muriwai, but the inner Manukau harbour also has a key sites for us, for sites key a has also harbour Manukau inner the but Muriwai, and
land andsea. Attendee:Member Neil Henderson WRLB Whitianga:1 1 rd
rald ad fe vr scesul ipeetd Te Dunes The implemented. successfully very often and trialled,
o support and encourage the development of cost of development the encourage and support o - 13 March2015
ose crazy plants and animals adapted to adapted animals and plants crazy ose ative at the Dune Restoration Trust of Restoration Trust Dune the ativeat mittee workshop hope that these massive structuresmassive these that hope - ae tutrs f n fr or form one of structures made
ve our coastal our ve important and important Page Page 301 at
Attachment B Item 29 Attachment B Item 29 Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee 5. 4. 3. 2. 1. TheConference May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
Environment, in other words, somewhat removed from the coal face, it does not seem to me to seem not does it face, coal the from removed somewhat words, other in Environment, mate published already collating and primarilycollecting be have to sides, both on scientists, these appears who Walrond, Dr of case the In cases matter. the on research original owntheir undertaken many In bad. do or who scientists science of good number interpretation, significant a are there that understand also I goodscience orbad. reason, whatever for change, climate causing are beings human that assertion his to adhere present At belief. religious inflexible it otherwise debate; for open ALWAYS is to akin more dogma, unquestioned an instead,simply scienceup end to science,being from proceeds that understanding my is it result, a as Havinga sciencebackground and having published intern his climate was causing disturbing humans about slightly change”. debate as any longer me no strike was “there did that emphasis that repeated however, thing, One the in rewarding. slippage found very I presented, sheet material other ice as well around as respect dynamics this in the and Antarctic as things such into insights theoretical fascinatingsomeprovided presentation worldwideWalrond’s .Dr and hishere community’sboth In 2007. and a mid half 1979 by rise between meter should level ranging sea the IAPCC, periods the of from predictions the loss on based ice consideration, sea of slides us first show the as than Callenderwento mentionedthenGuyandalsoalsoofDrwork Tyndalland the Wallrond warming global of prediction accurate an demonstrationthatit should taken be as a serious aspossibility. f less essential other seen and atmosphere, currently the in upward the heat included of Arrhenius convection calculations, his in clouds, omitted that he but effects, latitudinal as well discoveredas vapour water in changes from feedback I later, this on up following warmi global cause to enough large were processes combustion other and fuels fossil Arrheniusperson wasemissions predictcarbon first to that the dioxideof burning the fromof around ma ideas original the particular brief in and a study was climate of There history the rigorous. around was introduction conclusions own their underlying science the that keen providing was he d the information from came the all that presentation, Walrond’s Dr in early noted was It Walrond Change andRising Sealevels”. Carl Dr by address ParlimentaryCommisioner Environment the andfor subjectwas, the unsurprisingly, ”Climate an with opened conference The n - ae otiuin t ay hne w mgt e eig D Wlod oe that noted Walrond Dr seeing: be might we changes any to contributions made
- etr .hs i cret wl hv a osdrbe fet n u coa our on effect considerable a have will correct, if .This, century –
Day1 eliberations of the IAPPC. He noted too that his boss Jan Wright was very was Wright Jan boss his that too noted He IAPPC. the of eliberations
I understand that a significantly large group of scientists of group large significantly a that understand I
ationallyreview peer and undergone
rial for the Commission for the for Commission the for rial
rm h Ofc o the of Office the from cos Hs ok is work His actors. h presentation the not cet this accept Page Page ng. In ng. n to n stal 3 02
6. Coromandelcoastal dunes May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boa Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory Com 9. 8. 7. Newsites visibleNot Destroyed Locatedagain Recorded sites
n 92 bsln sre ws undertaken reassessedagain 25 wasyears later. survey baseline a 1982 In be can this and presentation her to side chilling very encapsulatedin the tablebelow. a also was there insights coastline, fascinating our the from of Aside inhabitants previous the about times.provided have sites these of recent some of excavations various relatively to AD early from 1300 age around in range arrivals They beaches. near so especially Coromandel, the in extensive p indoor the presentation This by louiseDr Furey,cominglater in the morning, remainshighlight as the of forit?? th overlevel sea the not does course of insignificant whateverriseCouncil. Eithera orreason,Auckland way,for the represent WRLB and opinion personal my is this However rigor. scientific around Wright the at emphasised he as especially view,scientific anti essentially strong, a such publicly propagate to him for appropriate how some http://www.dunestrust.org.nz/news fo be they clearlyare Departmenton ofConservation land. Furey’swhenDr powerpoint, “Justa memory” can even sites, Coromandel the for protection get to climate economic and political Waitakere the sorting towards hard work in sites archaeological own our andnote take to behovesitus recent,or Europeanmore pre HeritagebetheyArea,Ranges of documenting and recording accurate statistic sobering very a is This Furey’sbeen or destroyed. Dr to According astounding. is estimations,since 1959 records,over 41 of coastal% archaeological sites have disappeared development, property like activities human via ero natural through disappeared, has sites of number large a such That
n, s el s oe f h ohr rsnain a ti site this at presentations other the of some as well as und,
art of the conference for me. Archaeological sites, particularly pre European, areArchaeologicalparticularlyEuropean, conferenceme. sites,pre for the of art
e next few years is not to be sniffed at. Are we even close to being ready being to close even we Are at. sniffed be to not is years few next e - archeologicaland culturalvalues rd 127 1982 out things in our own patch. It is a difficult process in the current the in process difficult a is It patch. own our in things out
and considering how far we are currently behind in the the in behind currently are we far how considering and - and -
events/whitianga einn o hs rsnain te ihs f Jan of wishes the presentation, his of beginning
f at os Crmne sts n then and sites Coromandel Coast East of - mittee workshop 2015/ 17 4 71 52 2007
- 75
sion or destruction or sion Page Page 303
Attachment B Item 29 Attachment B Item 29 Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee 12. Firststop Buffalo beach 11. Fieldtrips 10. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board
are aare couple ofphotos takenof the two approaches atBuffalo beach. Belowaroundinstead. sand of bit a move just maybeand be it let to trythey suggestingthat and tension of degree suitable a is controversy,where ispushing onegroup more for and concrete rock and dune the group a there meet, techniques two the ,where middle the At di The planting. and creation dune of way by doing been have locals what us showed guide, dune able very our Dahm, Jim north, the to further but is it what is buttress great The promenade. resp in been has This time. some for aggregation rock and building wallextensive to subject been has beach This groups have beentrying doto on Coromandel the East Coast. ,”between real a get and off shoes our take dunes, sand some on out get to chance really.The for here allwere wewhat was This Onemananow, almost completelyobliterated by development. o one presentingjust libertyof the havetaken I
fferences between the two approaches are very much of the chalk and cheese kind. kind. cheese and chalk the of much very are approaches two the between fferences
onse to the close proximity of the road and the Whitianga town ship town Whitianga the and road the of proximity close the to onse
the toes” feel for what various Coast care and Dune and care Coast various what for feel toes” the
f her slides here, the archaeological site from archaeological site the here, slides her f
Page Page 304 re
May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boa Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory Com 13. Cooksbeach
these propertiesthese are worth millions. wo Who roof, the through going prices house coastal current with Now sea. the to close too build to folk allowing from simply created was that problem a solve to way blunt and expensive very not is It an solid lost. the of almost was this were for sought solution houses the that some surprising past, the in the retention despite illegal and some intense very of been installation has this beach the of end East far the At foundations. awa lapping water with scary, pretty were people some for this of results the and cycle eroding year eighteen an of peak the at currently are We zone. intertidal the in almost aggregat the of one duringwasdone and as this sea to the close subdivisionsallowed too beenHere had to Whitianga. verybeach, close Cooks to us took ride bus a and ferry the across trip quick A
Figure 1. Buffalo 1. beachFigure facing to Township.south rocks in distance Note Whitianga ing periods no one realised that they were effectively building houses that were that houses buildingeffectively were they that realised one no periods ing rd Fig
ure 2. Buffaloure 2. beach North facing the to
uldn’twant preserveto theirinvestment? mittee workshop
d monumental kind. This is a is This kind. monumental d
y at their at y
Page Page 305
Attachment B Item 29 Attachment B Item 29 Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee 15. 14. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Figure 4. Dune 4. Figure towardscreation and plantings the w
drop downdrop to theshoresea throughthe rock buttresses. to trying to experience different completely a was properties these from sea the to through diffe how shows below image The results the notice and also appreciatehow lessmuch toit would eventuallycost them. began others Soon ago. years five about advice this follow to started m things far intertidal, down the settle from wouldsand up bring and area the level to machinery heavy with done shore partof their property was re wer rocks the that couple a convince to able was and owners property foreshore other the of some reach to able was Dahm Jim Luckily,
Figure 3. East 3. CooksFigure end of beach.battering Rock and staircasesconcrete r ta te mgt ae mgnd Al uo t te ope who couple the to kudos All imagined. have might they than ore
a sensible from sensible distance a the intertidal - established with suitable plantingsand shapingsome was rently the fore shore of these properties looks. Walking Walking looks. properties these of shore fore the rently estern Cooks end of beach.estern Luckily, these houses wereatback set
e not necessarily the only way to go. If the fore fore the If go. to way only the necessarily not e
Page Page 306
18. 17. 16. Day2 May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boa Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory Com
appreciated. exploreevery and nook cranny of this couples vitaland artistic space.Very much forthe hour or so it took forus to shelter from the sudden down place,home dotterelsto andbirds sea but also remainingon the Coromandel. were We fortunate toablebe notto only explore amazingthis thathadhe landed next to oneof largest the undeveloped dunenaturalland areas Taranakiand when decided he to relocateto the Co MichaelSmithers had beeninvolved with dunerestoration projects for manyyears in the GianMcGregor at Otama beach. archaeologic wellas astute observations Drfrom Furey of sites where erosionwas destroying the Thehighlight, aside thefrom examination ofa rangeof dune formationsand plantingsas inspectionMount of Pahanga. Coromandelbeaches,from toWhangapoua, Kuaotunu, Thursdayconsisted wholly extremely of well organised tripsfield ato range of eastern
al sites,was ourvisit hometo the of the artistMichael Smithers and his partner rd Figure 5. Otama 5. Figure beach
natural dunes sand tohave run free of Michael and Gias home romandel,at Otama beach,he found
Otama beachto Sarahs Gullyand an mittee workshop
-
pour,have cup a of tea and
Page Page 307
Attachment B Item 29 Attachment B Item 29 Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory workshop Committee 20. 19. Friday May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board Conclusions
The preservation and protection of our precious coastal dune resources. This was my first my was This resources. dune coastal precious our of common:protection and in preservation thing The one have all they and Zealand New throughout organisations energetic an vital a is There groups throughout the country. various by undertaken been had that projects specific site of Roundup regional the missed I in work restoration Dune of discussions plenty Northland,Unfortunatelybayand the in of before leaveWaikato. lunchhadjust so to I well as DOC from Smith Haden by Coromandel theinmanagement dotterel discussionon wasa EnvironmentalSociety.There Defense the trust, Dunes the th for with both material, up wrap some included conference the of day last The -
Finalday theof Conference eir yearly report as well as a presentation on the state of new Zealand’s beaches by beaches Zealand’s new of state the on presentation a as well as report yearly eir
d active organisation here that represents a huge number of self of number huge a represents that here organisation active d Figure 6. Gia Michael 6. McGregorFigure Smithers and Figure 7. Michael work 7. Smithers: Figure in progress
Page Page -
driven 308
21. May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Boa Dune 2015 Restoration(NAEAC)Conference Trust and National to Animalon Update Ethicsmember's attendance the Advisory Com
of community of engagement thatanyone, including us thefrom west would well do emulate.to walls.appearsIt thatalmost without exception, they have looked never back. Thisisa model res without coastline, local the and properties their protect to idea his implement to begun have and no faith of headed leap necessary level the taken this has folk that nonsense such vision his in has confidence enough he instil to able way been has miraculous He the and has he vision and foresight the transmitted visionthis to landownersalong theCoromandel co for Dahm Jim to off hat my take also I 1959. since disappeared or destroyed been having sites recorded the of s dune coastal our in face weattrition the on archaeologicalexperts our of terriblefrustration the felt also I do. to trying were they work the and patches own their for c Dunes
onference and I was thoroughly impressed by the dedication all the participants hadparticipants the all dedication the byimpressed thoroughly was I and onference rd
mittee workshop astline. orting to rock batters or solid or batters rock to orting
ites, with almost halfalmost with ites, Page Page 309
Attachment B Item 29
1. Purpose FileNo.: Confirmationof workshoprecords May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordsConfirmation Authorisers Authors J I H G F E D C B A No. Attachments a) That the Recommendation
Signatories
ofrs ht h atce rcrs f h wrsos ed 7 oebr 4 n 11 and 4 November, 27 held workshops correct record. 5 the and February 26 of 19, 12, records 2014, December attached the that Confirms o o o o o o o o o o This reportpresents records ofworkshops held bythe RangesWaitakere Local Board on:
Waitākere RangesWaitākere Local Board:
26 March26 2015 March19 2015 March12 2015 5 March2015 2 February19 2015 February12 2015 December11 2014 4 December2014 November27 2014 CP2015/08237 6 February2015
WorkshopRecords WorkshopRecords WorkshopRecords WorkshopRecords WorkshopRecords Title Whau Glenn Boyd TuaViliamu WorkshopRecords Work WorkshopRecords WorkshopRecords WorkshopRecords
shopRecords
- – -
Relationship Ma 27 November 27 March2014 to 2015 DemocracyAdvisor
------
26 March2015 19 March2015 12 March2015 5March2015 26 February2015 19 February2015 12 February2015 11 December2014 4December 2014 27 November2014
nager Henderson nager -
27
1, 9 n 2 Mrh 05 r a re and true a are 2015 March 26 and 19 12, ,
November2014 to March2015
- Massey, Ranges,Waitakere Pag Page e 331 329 327 325 323 321 319 317 315 313 311
Item 30
5.0 4.0 3 2.0 1.0 .0 Members PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS Apologies:
going forward. Officers Plan Visitor Management Agreement. Board Local their in set out as 2015, June 1 30 July to 2014 from year the for objectives their towards on progress focused The members Report Performance Financial Auckland Guidelines, Design draft concerns. and considerations/views boards the and Area Heritage Ranges on Waitakere the for principles board Transports the with Discussion Transport Auckland items administration various dealtwith The members updates portfolio & Administration programme. activation summer b updated the Officers space open of activation Summer
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Board Ranges Local Waitakere am 11.00 2014 November 27 Thursday
Presland Greg Toms Saffron Steve Tollestrup Neil Henderson Yates, JP Denise QSO Coney, Sandra updated the board on the visitor management plan and options options planand visitor management on the board updated the –
5.30 pm pm 5.30
s -
–
– 27 November 27 March2014 to 2015 oard on the progress of the Glen Eden Town Square Square Town Eden the Glen of progress on the oard
draft Design Guidelines Design draft
Item
from 11.48 am from 11.33 am from 11.16 am from 11.3 from
3 am
Presenter Jenny MacDonald Jenny Andrew Wood David Rose Beasley Chris Richard Schuster Owena Rob Jones Davies Sharon Trevelyan Andrew Beckerleg Peter Jenny Tanner Liousse Claire
Knott Page Page
313
Attachment A Item 30
9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 & 2.0 1.0 Members PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordsConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS Apologies:
December business meeting. business December cancel was item workshop This proposal Wananga Waititi Hoani Report Performance Financial on the board thewith discussion Further Report Performance Financial the Waitakere and Beach) (Bethells Henga Te board the the with discussed Officers document HengaLAP discussion Te was provided. also transitionphase Streams Twin Project and allocation budget year’s this of summary overall on the the board to provided was An update Parks Applications. Fund Support Event Local 2, Round 2014/2015, the board thewith Discussion application Funding Events freshwater/marine. programme Monitoring and Summary Cards Report Auckland State of report, monitoring environment the of State the on board the updating and Discussion report monitoring environment the State of forward going and Eden Glen Road, 40 Glendale of subdivision proposed and rationalisation the on and feedback views boards’ were seeking Officers Eden Glen Road, 40 Glendale The mem updates portfolio & Administration
Waitakere Ranges Local Boar Ranges Local Waitakere am 9.00 2014 December 04 Thursday
Presland Greg Toms Saffron Steve Tollestrup Neil Henderson Yates, JP Denise QSO Coney, Sandra bers dealt with various administration items items administration various dealtwithbers –
5.30 pm 5.30 pm
River Valley Local Area Plan (LAP). (LAP). Plan Area Local Valley River
-
–
27 November 27 March2014 to 2015
next financial year. A general update on year. update general A financial next
led. It will be an agenda item the for item agenda an will be It led.
d Office
Item –
2nd workshop 2nd
Presenter Keith Williams David Rose Liousse Claire Jennings Grant / Juliette Holdgate Cade Barbara Mart Advisor) Engagement (Senior McCol Letitia Davies Sharon in Neale in
l
Page Page 315
Attachment B Item 30
4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 M PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordsConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS Apologies:
embers
House. Shadbolt bo the with discussed Officers House Shadbolt projects. stage second possible and year the 20104/15 for financial Programme the part of as implemented being currently what projects on board thewith Discussion a Update Projects Waitākere items. administration various dealtwith The members updates portfolio & Administration with consultant. the meeting b to the update an provided Manager LB Relationship Plan Weed on Update
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Board Ranges Local Waitakere am 1.30 2014 December 11 Thursday
Presland Greg Toms Saffron Steve Tollestrup Neil Henderson Yates, JP Denise QSO Coney, Sandra – Ranges Heritage Area Implementation Programme Programme Area Implementation Heritage Ranges
5.30 pm 5.30 pm
nd Second Stage Projects. Stage Second nd -
–
27 November 27 March2014 to 2015
ard issues and options for the future of of the future for options and issues ard
Item
oard regarding his his regarding oard –
Presenter Rebecca Kunnin Rebecca Maharjan Raj Davies Sharon Boyd Glenn Page Page
317
Attachment C Item 30
8.0 7.0 6.0 & 5.0 4.0 3.0, 2.0, 1.0 Members PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordsConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS Apologies:
initiatives funded the local board of development on the Offic quality water coastlagoon West events. future around discussion and Eden in Glen project pop on the to members the update provided an Officers update Event Summer Eden Glen prices. and options erosion mitigation domain the Huia for feedback consultation the board thewith Discussion Parks Huia Domain, items administration various and only members allocated to Time Updates, Portfolio discus Board Members Administration, session, Board Members 15 on the Piha atday exhibition boa thewith Discussion Waterman Ultimate The
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Board Ranges Local Waitakere am 11.00 2015 12 February Thursday
ers briefed the board on West coast lagoon water quality and updated updated and quality water lagoon coast West on board the briefed ers Steve Tollestrup Presland Greg Toms Saffron Neil Henderson Yates, JP Denise S andra Coney, QSO Coney, andra –
5.30 pm pm 5.30
-
–
27 November 27 March2014 to 2015
rd on the Ultimate Waterman event which holds an which holds event Ultimate the Waterman on rd
–
14 to 21 March 2015 March 14 21 to
th
March.
Item
11.13 am from
- up town square square up town
sion, sion, Presenter Phil Brown Phil Jenny Tanner / Liousse Claire Maharjan Raj Members and Davies Sharon Operations Event Ultimate Blaire Ren Debbie Weller Cade Barbara Trask Saskia
Page Page
–
319
Attachment D Item 30
4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Members PRESENT: Venu Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges L ofworkshop recordsConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS Apologies:
e:
and d work 1 Phase the board thewith Discussion Report WRHA Monitoring performance. financial Board Local the around basedwas discussion and Report Performance Quarterly with Finance the the members provided Officer Pe Quarterly Finance 2015. March for scheduled event on this the members to provided was An update Lactic Turkey items administration various dealtwith The members Admin
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Board Ranges Local Waitakere topm 4.30 1pm 2015 19 February Thursday
istration & portfolio updates updates portfolio & istration Steve Tollestrup Presland Greg Toms Saffron Neil Henderson Yates, JP Denise QSO Coney, Sandra ocalBoard
-
–
27 November 27 March2014 to 2015 rformance Report rformance
Item
left @ 4.35 pm @ left 4.35
escription of the Phase 2. Phase the of escription
Sharon Davies Sharon Presenter Shields Eryn David Rose Shaun Collins Bell Stephen Page Page
321
Attachment E Item 30
6.0 5.0 4.0 & 3.0 2.0 1.0 Members PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordsConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS Apologies:
plan as a result of this consultation. of a as plan result action LAP the to are proposed that changes and LAP draft the on Focused Valley River Waitakere the and Beach) (Bethells Henga Te AreaPlan for Local p potential into investigation Transport’s Auckland of Discussion Henderson Walkway, Road Mountain items administration various dealtwith The members updates portfolio & Administration budgets OPEX and CAPEX overall the Discussed time Services Local Board Members onlydiscussions Members Board Members
rojects previously identified. identified. previously rojects Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Board Ranges Local Waitakere to pm 5.30 12pm 2015 26 February Thursday
Steve Tollestrup Presland Greg Toms Saffron Neil Henderson Yates Denise QSO Coney, Sandra
- , JP
–
27 November 27 March2014 to 2015
Item
12.17pm from
transport transport Presenter Board Member Board Liousse Claire Raj rassol Abdul Hussan board members and Davies Sharon David Curran Raewyn Boyd Glenn Maharjan
Rose Page Page
-
323
Attachment F Item 30
5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Members PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordsConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS
co Dieback Kauri the by delivered that is being work the of board thewith Discussion co Kauri dieback Ranges Waitakere for Policy Events a draft of development on the focused members Board Policy Event Draft policy. grants Community adopted with recently the in accordance grant programme r board thewith Discussion Grants Community - - - The updates Portfolio administration various dealtwith The members updates portfolio & Administration
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Board Ranges Local Waitakere 11am 2015 5 March Thursday
Member Saffron Toms Saffron Member Yate. Denise Deputy Chair Coney Sandra Chair following Steve Tollestrup Toms Saffron 11.30pm) (from Neil Henderson Presland Greg Yates, JP Denise QSO Coney, Sandra –
5pm 5pm - ordinator
members provided a portfolio update a portfolio provided members
- . ordinator ordinator
- Programme implementation implementation Programme
–
27 November 27 Marc2014 to
egarding a need to start designing their local local their designing to start a need egarding
–
Purpose of item of Purpose Item
h h 2015 items items
Presenter Christine Rose Christine Hill Stacey Cade Barbara MacDonald Jenny Davies Marion Members Davies Sharon
Page Page
325
Attachment G Item 30
Members PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworks Confirmation
WaitakereRanges LocalBoard Office This workshop cancelled was ThursdayMarch12 2015
St Toms Saffron 11.30pm) (from Neil Henderson Presland Greg Yates, JP Denise QSO Coney, Sandra hop records eve Tollestrup eve LocalBoard -
–
27 November 27 March2014 to 2015
Page Page 327
Attachment H Item 30
6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Members PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordsConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS
faced by the Local Board at Piha today. at Board Local by faced the the issues of many for a context Piha provides of Landscape Changing The an changed Piha has how showing images historic the about to speak Coney Chair for An opportunity Piha of landscape Changing Ranges. the in Youth on An update Development Community Centre Town Eden Glen in improvement amenity safety and for options potential Discussed Eden Glen not available. the t of some to build volunteers a use potential to the well as as Creek MuddyWalkway Little the and Foothills Walkway Swanson the for funding of allocation the with board the Discussed Parks dealtwi The members updates portfolio and Administration feedback. Plan submission Term Long and House Shadbolt the Update time Services Local Board
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Board Ranges Local Waitakere 9am 2015 March 19 Thursday
– Steve Tollestrup Toms Saffron Neil Henderson Presland Greg Yates, JP Denise QSO Coney, Sandra
5.30pm 5.30pm -
allocation of CAPEX money of allocation
-
–
27 November 27 March2014 to 2015 th various administration items items administration various th
d not changed over the past 100 years and more. years and more. 100 past the over not changed d
-
Item
racks where funding is where funding racks
Boyd Glenn Presenter Chair Sandra Coney Sandra Chair Tanner /Jenny Trinh Susie / Sharma Monica And / Liousse Claire Male Hill /Huw Jennings / Grant Biffin Helen / Kaitlyn White Members Davies Sharon rew Trevelyan rew
Page Page
329
-
Attachment I Item 30
4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 Members PRESENT: Venue: Time: Date: WaitakereRanges Local Board RecordofWorkshop May14 2015 WaitākereRanges Local Board ofworkshop recordsConfirmation DISCUSSED: MATTERS Apologies:
Programme. Work Renewals CAPEX reviewthe To Progra Work 2015/16 Capex Facility Community Long and budgets projects, upcoming of Discussion Services Local Board items administration various dealtwith The members updates portfolio and Administration programme. implementation year the part of as WRHA financial forum community the discuss To WRHA Programme Implementation WRHA
Waitakere Ranges Local Board Office Board Ranges Local Waitakere pm 12.30 2 Thursday
Saffron Toms Saffron Steve Tollestrup Neil Henderson Presland Greg Yates, JP Denise QSO Coney, Sandra – 6 March 2015 March 6
5.30 pm pm 5.30
- –
27 November 27 March2014 to 2015
Item
-
one of the projects to deliver this to this deliver theone projects of
mme mme
- Term Plan Term
Presenter Presenter Peter Loud Peter Curran Raewyn David Rose Boyd Glenn Members Davies Sharon Shields Eryn Maharjan Raj
Page Page
331
Attachment J Item 30