DOCSLIB.ORG

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Eugenics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Eugenics View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE OPINION ARTICLE published: 20provided October by 2014 Frontiers - Publisher Connector PUBLIC HEALTH doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00201 Intellectual and developmental disabilities: eugenics 1 2 Ingrid Grenon and Joav Merrick * 1 Formerly affiliated with Wrentham Developmental Center, Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services, Wrentham, MA, USA 2 Division for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Ministry of Social Affairs and Social Services, Health Services, Jerusalem, Israel *Correspondence: [email protected] Edited by: Frederick Robert Carrick, Carrick Institute for Graduate Studies, USA Reviewed by: Susan Elizabeth Esposito, Life University, USA Linda Mullin Elkins, Life University, USA Matthew M. Antonucci, Carrick Institute for Graduate Studies, USA Keywords: intellectual disability, eugenics, developmental disabilities, history, social darwinism INTRODUCTION and human betterment became prevalent. This work portrays, according to God- Those working today with individuals with Unbelievably, the US was a hotbed of racial dard, an actual case study of the family of intellectual and developmental disabilities purists striving to protect their master race one of the feeble-minded residents under (IDD) are often not aware of the dark side at the time. his care at the Training School. He gives of our history concerning the treatment of All of this coincided nicely with French her a fictional name, Deborah Kallikak, this population and why we,some 150 years psychologist Alfred Binet (1857–1911) and and goes on to trace her family back to ago, made institutions or state schools for his test to measure intelligence, first pub- her great–great–great grandfather Martin them (1). lished in 1905. The Binet test, originally Kallikak Sr., a Revolutionary War soldier Maybe we have forgotten or chosen to intended to identify mentally retarded chil- who had an unfortunate liaison with a forget something that we were not taught dren within the school system, strength- young woman who was “feeble-minded in school, and it is likely that our teachers ened the eugenics movement by giving it and degenerate.” This faux pas, according did not know it either. additional impetus. to Goddard, led to “an appalling amount In 1906, Dr. Henry Herbert God- of defectives.” The descendants numbered EUGENICS dard (1866–1957) was the Director of 480, and of those at least 332 were deter- In 1883, Sir Francis Galton (1822–1911), the Research Department at the Training mined to be “defective” according to God- cousin of Charles Darwin (1809–1882), School for the feeble-minded in Vineland, dard’s research methodology. coined the term “eugenics.” In his book NJ, USA. Opening its doors in March of The results of Goddard’s study, accord- “Inquiries into human faculty and its devel- 1888, the Training School in Vineland was ing to Goddard, proved that feeble- opment” from 1883, Galton loosely defines considered to be the third institution of its mindedness was passed from one genera- eugenics as “the cultivation of race,”or “the kind; the first opened in Massachusetts in tion to the next. He warned the reader in science of improving stock” (2). 1848 and the second in NewYork in 1852. It his final chapter, in regard to the woman Eugenics is among many late nine- was at the New Jersey Training School that with whom Martin Kallikak Sr. had been teenth century ideologies encompassed in Binet’s Intelligence Testwas translated from indiscreet,“When we conclude that had the the term Social Darwinism. This coin- French to English and readied for prac- nameless girl been segregated in an institu- cided, interestingly, with the Progressive tical application under Goddard’s direc- tion, this defective family would not have Era, which occurred in the period roughly tion. Interestingly, it was also Dr. Goddard existed.” Regarding just the Kallikak fam- from the 1890s into the 1920s in the who coined the term “moron.” (Goddard ily, Goddard further adds, “Society had to United States. So-called“Progressives”were derived “moron” from the ancient Greek pay the heavy price.”The good doctor again responsible for the Food and Drug Act in “moros,” meaning dull, foolish, or sinful). cautions the reader by reminding them, 1906, Prohibition in 1919, and women’s Binet’s test became known as an IQ test. “There are Kallikak families all about us – right to vote in 1920. In 1912, “The Kallikak family” (3) writ- they are multiplying at twice the rate of Galton’s new science spread like a wild- ten by Dr. Goddard was published, and the general population.” Goddard fanned fire in the United Kingdom and the United soon became a bible of sorts for proponents the flames of the eugenic fire until it raged States and in 1907 Indiana passed the first of eugenics (4). This book, and many oth- out of control. It should be no surprise, law allowing “undesirables and defectives,” ers like it, became best sellers of the time. with this book on the best seller list and such as the“mentally retarded,”to be invol- The “Kallikak family” is significant because taken very seriously indeed, there was a untarily sterilized. This is considered to be it was the first of its kind, and certainly surge in the sterilization frenzy. Massachu- the first such eugenic “law” to be passed in quite popular. In his book, Goddard warns setts, however, was one of the few states the world. By 1909, California had passed of a “rising tide of feeble-mindedness,” that did not have mandatory sterilization laws permitting the sterilization of “unde- and urges his readers to take action lest laws. sirables.” Terms, such as mental hygiene, a “hereditary taint” should become the A myriad of books with the same theme racial hygiene, social hygiene, and racial ruination of our society. seem to have emerged between 1912 and www.frontiersin.org October 2014 | Volume 2 | Article 201 | 1 Grenon and Merrick Intellectual disability and eugenics 1930, all touting the necessity of eugenics shall be segregated … Feeble- to authorize the legitimacy of the ster- and giving ample warning of how our soci- mindedness is 80% hereditary. By ilization of defectives within the United ety would degenerate if its principles were segregation only can sufficient relief States, especially those who were insti- not followed. “Safe counsel or practical be obtained so that these unfortu- tutionalized (4). To summarize the lit- eugenics” (5) published in 1922, not sur- nates will not propagate their kind igation; in 1924, the superintendent of prisingly in Illinois, was a manual encour- … Segregation is humane and effec- a Virginia state school, Dr. John Hen- aging young men and women to find “suit- tive, and a good financial investment dren Bell, requested permission from the able” partners in marriage in order to for developing greater prosperity and school’s Board of Directors to have 18- “improve the human race.” In addition, happiness in the future. year-old Carrie Buck sterilized, because in the book advocates for “sterilization of the his opinion she was both feeble-minded In January of 1922, Massachusetts feeble-minded, degenerate, and criminal.” and promiscuous. It would seem that Miss Governor Channing Cox (1879–1968) A study of the feeble-minded (6) published Buck had given birth to an illegitimate addressed the Massachusetts Legislature in 1920, addressed the “national problem child, and that both her mother and grand- and the following is a bit of what he said: of the mental defective” and specifically mother had been suspected of being men- stated that the “mentally defective” are The Commonwealth has recognized tally retarded. What is really notable is what those who are not able to have a home and the importance of a practical men- the Supreme Court Justice had to say about for whom “the only permanent parent is tal hygiene program, and had pro- the case: the State.” vided much legislation to make effec- It is better for all the world, if From California, the first hotbed of tive such a program. The State’s pro- instead of waiting to execute degen- eugenics proponents, Ezra S. Gosney gram for the feeble-minded embraces erate offspring for crime or to let (1855–1942) and Paul Popenoe (1888– the following factors: them starve for their imbecility, soci- 1979) brought us “Sterilization for human • Identification ety can prevent those who are man- betterment” (7), a book chronicling 6,000 • Registration ifestly unfit from continuing their “successful” sterilizations in California of • Education kind:::three generations of imbeciles “idiots and other undesirables.” According • Supervision are enough. to Gosney “eugenic sterilization, primarily, • Segregation is applied by the state or with its sanction, to persons who would be likely to produce Of course, segregation was important in CONCLUSION defective children.” this age of eugenics, and interestingly the It is sufficient to say that eugenics was not In 1911, when Dr. Goddard was busy third Massachusetts“state school,”Belcher- only fashionable; it had somehow become studying the bloodlines of some of the res- town, would have opened the same year. the law of the land. There were so many idents at the Training School in New Jersey, Just 1 year earlier, in September of 1921, eugenics devotees lurking about during the the Governor of that state, Woodrow Wil- Cox made history when he became the early part of the last century that it would son (1856–1924) and later 28th US Pres- first Massachusetts governor to broadcast require a whole volume just to name them ident, signed a sterilization bill that went live. His radio debut was made in Spring- all. into law. The new 1911 law specifically field, MA, USA at the Eastern States Exhibi- The eugenics movement began to stated,“An act to authorize and provide for tion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eugenics, Pt. 2
    Eugenics, Pt. 2 8.31 Lecture - LPS 60 Review: Eugenicists claim to be supported by which two scientific theories? Scientific theory Application by Eugenicists Natural Selection -----------> Darwinian Morality (“Might makes right”) Hard Heredity ------------> Genetically-determined Social fitness Review: Eugenicists claim to be supported by which two scientific theories? Scientific theory Application by Eugenicists Natural Selection -----------> Darwinian Morality (“Might makes right”) Hard Heredity ------------> Genetically-determined Social fitness 1. Darwinian Morality “One of the effects of civilization is to diminish the rigour of the application of the law of natural selection. It preserves weakly lives that would have perished in barbarous lands.” “The question was then forced upon me: Could not the race of men be similarly improved? Could not the undesirables be got rid of and the desirables multiplied?” - Francis Galton, "Hereditary Talent and Character" in MacMillan's Magazine Vol. XII (May - October 1865). London Poster, 1910s 2. Genetically-determined social fitness The following groups are deemed socially ‘unfit’: epileptics, depressed, poor (paupers), criminals, alcoholics, blind, deformed, deaf, feeble-minded Galton (1869) focuses on intelligence. Laughlin (1922) includes all of these groups and more under the label “socially inadequate”. London Poster, 1910s “Eugenics...is capable of becoming the most sacred ideal of the human race, as a race; one of the supreme religious duties… Once the full implications of evolutionary biology are grasped, eugenics will inevitably become part of the religion of the future” - Julian Huxley, Eugenics Review (28:1), 1936 Huxley was a biology professor at King’s College London & the Royal Institution as well as a Fellow of the Royal Society of London; he’s said to be the founder of the “modern evolutionary synthesis”.
    [Show full text]
  • Minds Made Feeble : the Myth and Legacy of the Kallikaks
    The Myth and Legacy of the Kaffikaks J. David Smith AN ASPEN PUBLICATION ® Aspen Systems Corporation Rockville, Maryland Royal Tunbridge Wells 1985 Deborah at the Sewing Machine. Reprinted from The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness byH.H. Goddard, 1912, New York: Macmillan. Contents Foreword lx A ckn o wledgm en ts xiii Chapter 1—Introduction 1 Chapter 2—The Study 11 Chapter 3—Deborah 21 Chapter 4—The Context 37 Chapter 5—Elizabeth Kite 49 Chapter 6—Acclaim, Criticism, and Defense 61 Chapter 7—Revisiting the Kallikaks 83 Chapter 8—Immigrants, Morons, and Democracy 115 Chapter 9—Eugenics, Sterilization, and the Final Solution 135 Chapter 10—The New Eugenics 169 Epilogue 191 Index 195 vii Foreword It IS STRANGE THAT SO MANY YEARS WENT BY BEFORE SOME- one tried to find out the real name of the Kallikak family, making it possible to test Goddard's descriptions and conclu¬ sions against reality. After all, Goddard's work not only gave rise to considerable scientific controversy, but also had a profound influence in matters of public policy, legislation, institution building, and public education. With each pass¬ ing decade the critiques of Goddard's study multiplied, and even those who were ''hereditarians" agreed that his study was a frail reed to which to tie their arguments. However, it seemed as if we would never know what the ignoble IX X Minds Made Feeble Kallikaks were really like—where and how they lived; the ways they conducted their vocational, personal, and famil¬ ial lives; and how their contemporaries saw them.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenics and Malaga Island
    Eugenics and Malaga Island The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Davenport, Melissa. 2020. Eugenics and Malaga Island. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365642 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Eugenics and Malaga Island Melissa Davenport A Thesis in the Field of Legal Studies for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University November 2020 Copyright 2020 [Melissa Davenport] Abstract In 1912, the state of Maine removed a multi-race community from Malaga, a tiny island off its coast. The state paid some islanders to leave their homes, and institutionalized others. Contemporary researchers cite eugenics as a factor in the eviction. In 1925, Maine passed a eugenic law that allowed forced sterilization, nearly 13 years after the Malaga eviction. What happened before 1925 that would give eugenics, manifested in this extreme policy, a foothold in the state? My research focused on primary, historical sources in law, medicine, and media. Maine poverty law, carried over from Elizabethan Poor Law, emphasized local town responsibility for the poor through legal settlement, which directly affected the Malaga Island eviction. Maine law regarding people with developmental disabilities emphasized state responsibility and made provisions for expansion of institutional care at the state level.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeble-Minded”, 1890-1931
    INSTITUTIONALIZING EUGENICS: CUSTODY, CLASS, GENDER AND EDUCATION IN NOVA SCOTIA’S RESPONSE TO THE “FEEBLE-MINDED”, 1890-1931 A Thesis Submitted to the College Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of History University of Saskatchewan By Leslie Elaine Baker © Leslie E. Baker, February 2015. All Rights Reserved. Permission to use In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Doctoral degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this dissertation in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my dissertation work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my dissertation work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this dissertation or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my dissertation. Requests for permission to copy or to make other use of material in this thesis whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of History Room 522, Arts Building 9 Campus Drive University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A5 Canada i Abstract Between 1890 and 1927 hundreds of Nova Scotian children and adults were identified as either feeble-minded or mentally deficient through investigations conducted by physicians and philanthropists in the province.
    [Show full text]
  • COGNITIVE DISABILTY and NARRATIVE by EVAN CHALOUPKA Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Docto
    COGNITIVE DISABILTY AND NARRATIVE by EVAN CHALOUPKA Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May 2018 2 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of Evan Chaloupka candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.* Committee Chair William Marling Committee Member Kimberly Emmons Committee Member Athena Vrettos Committee Member Jonathan Sadowsky Date of Defense February 9, 2018 * We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. 3 Table of Contents List of Figures .....................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................5 Abstract ...............................................................................................................................6 Chapter 1: Introduction The Possibility and Realization of Cognitive Disability and Narrative ......................7 Chapter 2 Reader Engagement with Cognitive Disability in American Literary Naturalism…35 Chapter 3 Trying to See Cognitive Disability: The Promise and Problem of Vision ................ 84 Chapter 4 History, Pathology, and Form in Modernist Narratives of Disability ......................133 Chapter 5 The Cognition of Connection: Narrating Family Experiences of Cognitive Disability
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Debate and Legislative Battle Over Compulsory Eugenic Sterilization in Louisiana, 1924-1932
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2017 A Vast Injustice: The Public eD bate and Legislative Battle veo r Compulsory Eugenic Sterilization in Louisiana, 1924 -- 1932 Adelaide Hair Barr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Barr, Adelaide Hair, "A Vast Injustice: The ubP lic Debate and Legislative Battle vo er Compulsory Eugenic Sterilization in Louisiana, 1924 -- 1932" (2017). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4490. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4490 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. “A VAST INJUSTICE” THE PUBLIC DEBATE AND LEGISLATIVE BATTLE OVER COMPULSORY EUGENIC STERILIZATION IN LOUISIANA, 1924-1932 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Adelaide Hair Barr B.A. Louisiana State University, 2004 M.A. Southeastern Louisiana University, 2010 August 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would have not been able to complete this project without the guidance, assistance, and support from so many. First, I would like to thank my major professor and director of this dissertation, Gaines M. Foster. His constructive critiques of my work made it better than I could have ever imagined.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Crime Hereditary? an Analysis of Biological Ideas from Eugenics to the Human Genome Project
    IS CRIME HEREDITARY? AN ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL IDEAS FROM EUGENICS TO THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT Presented by Xin Ying Tong in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion of the Evidence and Inquiry certificate and the Polymathic Scholars honors program in the College of Natural Sciences at The University of Texas at Austin Spring 2020 _________________________________________ ____________________ Philippa Levine, PhD Date Thesis Supervisor History The University of Texas at Austin _______________________________________________ ____________________ Rebecca A. Wilcox, Ph.D. Date Second Reader Honors & Scholarships, College of Natural Sciences The University of Texas at Austin i Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS II ABSTRACT III INTRODUCTION 1 WHAT ARE EUGENICS AND CRIME? 2 THE HISTORY OF BIOLOGY, EUGENICS, AND CRIME 4 EUGENIC FAMILY STUDIES 16 EUGENICS IN PRISONS AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES 21 COURT CASES AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 25 EUGENICS AND CRIME TODAY 31 CONCLUSION 35 REFERENCES 38 AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY 47 ii Acknowledgements I’d like to thank Dr. Philippa Levine for all her guidance, feedback, and support throughout this project. Her support and expertise have been integral to the writing of this thesis; her expertise allowed me to explore daunting new ideas, and she’s the best thesis mentor anyone could have asked for. I’d also like to thank Dr. Rebecca Wilcox for her guidance in structuring this thesis and feedback throughout its drafting. Her help identifying and narrowing the scope of this thesis was imperative to the development of ideas and conclusions. Lastly, I’d like to thank all my friends and peers who have provided feedback on this project. iii Abstract Eugenics, the idea of improving the biological quality of the human race, has been interrelated with concepts of crime since at least Classical times.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenics and Modern Biology: Critiques of Eugenics, 1910-1945 Garland E
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations Biology 5-2011 Eugenics and Modern Biology: Critiques of Eugenics, 1910-1945 Garland E. Allen Washington University in St Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/bio_facpubs Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Allen, Garland E., "Eugenics and Modern Biology: Critiques of Eugenics, 1910-1945" (2011). Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations. 5. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/bio_facpubs/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eugenics and Modern Biology: Critiques of Eugenics, 1910-1945 Garland E. Allen Department of Biology Washington University in St. Louis (Revised 6-30-10) Abstract Eugenics in most western countries in the first four decades of the twentieth century was based on the idea that genes control most human phenotypic traits, everything from physical features such as polydactyly and eye color to physiological conditions such as the A-B-O blood groups to mental and personality traits such as “feeblemindedness”, alcoholism and pauperism. It assessing the development of the eugenics movement – its rise and decline between 1900 and 1950 – it is important to recognize that its naïve assumptions and often flawed methodologies were openly criticized at the time by scientists and non-scientists alike. This paper will present a brief overview of the critiques launched against eugenicists’ claims, particularly criticisms of the American school led by Charles B.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelizing Eugenics: a Brief Historiography of Popular and Formal American Eugenics Education (1908-1948)
    Alberta Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 58, No. 4, Winter 2013, 657-690 Evangelizing Eugenics: A Brief Historiography of Popular and Formal American Eugenics Education (1908-1948) Michael J. Kohlman University of Alberta This article examines the history of the American Eugenics movement’s penetration into the formal and popular educational milieu during the first half of the 20th Century, and includes a review of some recent scholarly research on eugenic themes in education and popular culture. Apologists have dismissed the American Eugenics movement as a shortlived, racist, reactionary, and pseudoscientific aberration that was already dying long before the collapse of the Third Reich. Many official histories of biology and various social science disciplines including education were sanitized to expunge or trivialize the involvement of a host of important prophets, disciples, and evangelists in the eugenics movement. It was also common to divorce the research and statistical methods developed in the service of eugenics from their inspiration and original application to Galton’s secular religion of human betterment. In the last few decades, however, a new generation of scholars began to re-examine and illuminate the breadth and depth of the eugenics movement: its devotees and devotees’ actions and influence on their professions or academic disciplines and on society. These scholars also looked into how eugenics penetrated educational thought, curriculum, courses, and texts; thereby, revealing a panoply of overlapping interests, academic programs, organizations, and influential individuals that fatefully intersected and synergistically recombined into a powerful social movement throughout the first half of the 1900s. Cet article examine l’histoire de l’invasion des milieux formels et informels de l’éducation par l’eugénisme américain au cours de la première moitié du 20e siècle.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Deborah Kallikak?
    Who was Deborah Kallikak? By: J. David Smith and Michael L. Wehmeyer Smith, J. D. & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2012). Who was Deborah Kallikak? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 50(2), 169-178. Made available courtesy of the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: http://www.aaiddjournals.org/doi/full/10.1352/1934-9556-50.2.169 ***Reprinted with permission. No further reproduction is authorized without written permission from the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. This version of the document is not the version of record. Figures and/or pictures may be missing from this format of the document. *** Abstract: The Kallikak Family was, along with The Jukes: A Study in Crime, Pauperism, Disease, and Heredity, one of the most visible eugenic family narratives published in the early 20th century. Published in 1912 and authored by psychologist Henry Herbert Goddard, director of the psychological laboratory at the Vineland Training School for Feebleminded Children in Vineland, New Jersey, The Kallikak Family told the tale of a supposedly ''degenerate'' family from rural New Jersey, beginning with Deborah, one of the inmates at the Training School. Like most publications in the genre, this pseudoscientific treatise described generations of illiterate, poor, and purportedly immoral Kallikak family members who were chronically unemployed, supposedly feebleminded, criminal, and, in general, perceived as threats to ''racial hygiene.'' Presented as a ''natural experiment'' in human heredity, this text served to support eugenic activities through much of the first half of the 20th century. This article reviews the story of Deborah Kallikak, including her true identity, and provides evidence that Goddard's treatise was incorrect.
    [Show full text]
  • Fashioning a Feeble Mind: Cognitive Disability in American Fiction, 1830-1940 Lucy Wallitsch [email protected]
    Lawrence University Lux Lawrence University Honors Projects 5-31-2017 Fashioning a Feeble Mind: Cognitive Disability in American Fiction, 1830-1940 Lucy Wallitsch [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://lux.lawrence.edu/luhp Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons, Literature in English, North America Commons, and the Other English Language and Literature Commons © Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Recommended Citation Wallitsch, Lucy, "Fashioning a Feeble Mind: Cognitive Disability in American Fiction, 1830-1940" (2017). Lawrence University Honors Projects. 111. https://lux.lawrence.edu/luhp/111 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Lux. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lawrence University Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Lux. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fashioning a Feeble Mind Cognitive Disability in American Literature, 1830-1940 Lucy Wallitsch Honors Project, Spring 2017 Advisor: Melissa Range Table of Contents Introduction 2 Chapter 1: Gendered Archetypes of Cognitive Disability, 1830-1850 10 Chapter 2: Race-based Cure Narratives, 1850-1861 26 Chapter 3: The Failure of Cure Narratives and the Rise of Eugenics, 1870-1895 38 Chapter 4: Eugenic Narratives of Institutionalization, 1895-1920 52 Chapter 5: Gender and Eugenic Sterilization, 1920-1927 63 Chapter 6: Mercy Killings of Innocent Monsters, 1927-1940 78 Bibliography 97 1 Introduction On Thursday, January 29, 2015, Robert Ladd, an intellectually disabled man, was put to death in Texas. In any other state, his execution would have been illegal—his IQ was 67, below the nationally recognized score for cognitive disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenic Family Studies
    31/12/2019 Encyc - Eugenics Archives Eugenic family studies Robert A. Wilson The study of traits, characteristics, and behaviour that run in families has played a special role in the history of eugenics. Most significantly for the development of eugenics in North America, a series of family studies, beginning with Richard Dugdale’s The Jukes in 1877, provided both popular and scientific grounding for the view that criminality, pauperism, and the traits of individuals putatively responsible for them could be traced through family lines. These studies were taken to show the heritability of eugenic traits, and to support the conclusion that forms of negative eugenic intervention, such as institutionalization or sterilization, would be socially and economically beneficial. Despite their influence and embeddedness in the science of the day, these fifteen family studies, stretching over a 50 year period, were deeply flawed. They have been criticized for their shifting and inconsistent characterization of families, for presuming what they purport to show, and for their failure to consider alternative explanations for the traits they investigated (Rafter 1988, Lombardo 2001). Galton on Family Traits The idea that both physical and mental traits run in families, like the aphorism, ‘like begets like’, has a history antecedent to eugenics. In the eugenicsarchive.ca/discover/encyclopedia/535eebbb7095aa0000000225 1/7 31/12/2019 Encyc - Eugenics Archives wake of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859), however, these folk genealogical ideas were cast in a larger evolutionary framework. Darwin’s first cousin, Sir Francis Galton, was especially preoccupied with cognitive, personality, and emotional characteristics that were distinctively human, and with showing that these were as subject to heredity as were the physical traits of plants and animals.
    [Show full text]