Agricultural Intensification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agricultural Intensification Agricultural intensification - Saving space for wildlife? Frédéric Baudron Thesis committee Thesis supervisor Prof. dr. K.E. Giller Professor of Plant Production Systems Wageningen University Thesis co-supervisors Dr. M. Corbeels Research Scientist Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD) Brasilia, Brasil Dr. J.A. Andersson Research Scientist Wageningen University Centre for Applied Social Sciences (CASS), University of Zimbabwe Harare, Zimbabwe Dr. P. Tittonell Research Scientist Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD) Harare, Zimbabwe Other members Prof. dr. ir. C. Leeuwis, Wageningen University Prof. dr. D.H.M. Cumming, University of Cape Town, University of Zimbabwe Dr. ir. W.A.H. Rossing, Wageningen University Dr. P. Caron, Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), Montpellier, France This research was conducted under the auspices of the C.T. de Wit Graduate School of Production Ecology and Resource Conservation ii Agricultural intensification – saving space for wildlife? Frédéric Baudron Thesis Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Thursday 8 September 2011 at 11 a.m. in the Aula iii Frédéric Baudron Agricultural intensification – saving space for wildlife? 244 pages. Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2011) With references, with summaries in Dutch, English and French. ISBN: 978-90-8585-964-2 Cover design: Nathalie La Hargue iv Pour Louis v vi Abstract ABSTRACT Increasing agricultural production and preventing further losses in biodiversity are both legitimate objectives, but they compete strongly in the developing world. In this study, current tensions between agricultural production and environmental conservation were described and analysed in Mbire District, an agricultural frontier shared with wildlife that lies in the Mid-Zambezi Valley, in the northern fringe of Zimbabwe. The potential of conservation agriculture (CA) to intensify agricultural production with minimum negative environmental effects was then explored. The population of Mbire District almost doubled between 1992 and 2002, while the livestock densities increased at rates above 15% in the early 1990s and the late 2000s. From 1980 to 2007, the expansion of farmland over the years was described by an exponential relationship. It was suggested that these changes affected elephant and buffalo numbers negatively. Increase in human population, increase in cattle population, and expansion of cotton farming were all drivers on the observed land use change. However, cotton farming was demonstrated to be paramount, enabling cattle accumulation and expansion of plough-based agriculture. The ‘environmental footprint’ per farm was increasing significantly with the area under cotton and with the number of draught animals owned. A kilogram of seed cotton required 50% more land, removed twice as much N, 50% more K and 20% more P than a kilogram of cereal. However, except for pesticide, one man-day invested in cotton production had a smaller environmental footprint than a man-day invested in cereal production. As farming in Mbire District is limited by labour more than by land, specialising in cereal production would increase the total area occupied by crops and fallows, whilst specializing in cotton production would reduce this area. Therefore, maintaining or increasing the relative profitability of cotton vs. cereal may ‘spare land’ for nature. Compared with current farmers’ cropping practices (CP), CA had no effect on cotton productivity during years that received average or above average rainfall. During a drier year, however, CA was found to have a slightly negative effect (110 kg ha-1 less in on-farm trials and 220 kg ha-1 less in farmers’ cotton fields). Most soils in the study area are coarse-textured soils, on which runoff were significantly greater vii with CA than with CP. For these reasons, farmers perceived ploughing as necessary during drier years to maximize water infiltration, but saw CA as beneficial during wetter years as a means to ‘shed water’ and avoid waterlogging. In Zimbabwe, the approach used in the extension of CA appears to differ little from an earlier attempt to intensify smallholder agricultural production almost a century earlier: the Alvord model. In particular, the rationale of African smallholder farming has been persistently ignored. The analysis of smallholder farming practices in Mbire District showed how the socio-economic constraints they faced predisposed them towards extensification. In particular, labour availability for weeding was found to be a major limiting factor in the area. The increased weed pressure in CA is therefore a major reason preventing smallholders from embracing it. As a conclusion, mitigating conflicts between agricultural production and biodiversity conservation will require major innovations, far beyond CA. CA should be seen as part of a larger basket of technologies aiming at ‘ecological intensification’. In parallel to the development of technical innovations, local institutions should be empowered and strong regulations put in place. Key words: agricultural frontier; smallholder; intensification; semi-arid area; wildlife; conservation agriculture; cotton; Zimbabwe. viii Contents Chapter 1. General introduction 1 Chapter 2. Delineating the drivers of waning wildlife habitat: The 15 predominance of cotton farming on the fringe of protected areas in the Mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe Chapter 3. What kind of farming can save wild nature? 49 Environmental footprint of farms in the Mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe Chapter 4. Comparative performance of conservation agriculture and 87 current smallholder farming in semi-arid Zimbabwe Chapter 5. Failing to Yield? Ploughs, conservation agriculture and 123 the problem of agricultural intensification. An example from the Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe Chapter 6. General discussion and conclusions: Agricultural 157 intensification – saving space for wildlife? References 187 Appendix 211 Summary 220 Samenvatting 225 Résumé 231 Acknowledgements 237 PE&RC PhD Education Certificate 241 Curriculum Vitae 242 Funding 244 ix Chapter 1 General introduction Chapter 1 2 General introduction 1.1. BACKGROUND Competing claims for land are acute in developing countries (Giller at al., 2008). Reducing the number of undernourished people, estimated to be 1.02 billion (FAO, 2009a), not only requires a reduction in poverty and more equity in food access, but also an increase in food production. Meeting this goal comes at a cost for some of the last biodiversity-rich areas on Earth. The need to slow down deforestation and extinction rates appears more pressing as the links between biodiversity and ecosystem processes on which human existence depends become better understood (Vitousek et al., 1997; Chapin et al., 2000; Loreau et al., 2001). Increasing agricultural production and at the same time minimizing the negative consequences of agriculture on biodiversity constitute probably one of the greatest challenges ahead for developing countries. Meeting this challenge will not be short of a new revolution (Tilman, 1998; Gregory et al., 2002). Conversion of rainforest to palm plantations in Southeast Asian and its acceleration due to demand for biofuel is prominent in the media (e.g. Fargione et al., 2008). For African savannas, the consequences of the increased demand for food, fiber and fuel on the habitat of the emblematic megafauna is of equal importance. In this study, I analyse competing claims on land between agriculture and conservation in an African savanna shared by people and wildlife: the Mid-Zambezi Valley, in northern Zimbabwe. 1.2. NEED FOR INNOVATION Agriculture affects biodiversity directly through changes in land use. Wild species are actively removed, controlled by the release of synthetic biocides or affected by disturbances associated to farming (Figure 1). The loss of a given species, particularly in the case of ‘keystone species’, may lead to further extinctions in trophic chains (Mills et al., 1993; Pace et al., 1999). In addition to these local impacts, agriculture may affect biodiversity regionally or globally through indirect changes (Figure 1). First, agriculture will often affect the biodiversity of adjacent landscapes through habitat fragmentation and fragment isolation (Pimm et al., 1995; Fischer and Lindenmayer, 2007). Second, agriculture affects hydrological and biogeochemical cycles, which may have far-reaching consequences on distant biodiversity. Farmland 3 Chapter 1 runoffs may cause siltation of distant streams, lakes, estuaries and coral reefs (Farella et al., 2001). Similarly, mobile nutrients such as nitrate and pesticides may contaminate regions downstream or downwind (Pimentel, 1995; Almasri and Kaluarachchi, 2004). The conversion of natural ecosystems to agriculture also releases CO2, which may contribute to global climate change and affect global biodiversity (Dixon et al., 1994; Vitousek et al., 1997). Increased Release of Biotic Biotic Alteration of Release Disturbances Synthetic Removals (e.g. Additions Hydrological of limiting (e.g. tillage, fire, Biocides competitors, (domestic Cycles elements grazing) predators, pests, species) (N, P) diseases) Altered Altered Soil
Recommended publications
  • Government Gazette, 30Th October, 2020 2567
    ZIMBABWEAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 30TH OCTOBER, 2020 2567 ZIMBABWEAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE Published by Authority Vol. XCVIII, No. 116 30th OCTOBER, 2020 Price RTGS$155,00 General Notice 2667 of 2020. MEDICINES AND ALLIED SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT [CHAPTER 15:03] _________ Refusal to Approve Registration of Veterinary Medicines Following Voluntary Withdrawal _________ IT is hereby notified, in terms of section 34(4) of the Medicines and Allied Substances Control Act [Chapter 15:03], that the Medicines Control Authority has refused to approve the registration of the medicines specified in the Schedule the applicants having withdrawn their application(s) for registration. G. N. MAHLANGU, 30-10-2020. Director-General. SCHEDULE APP NO GENERIC NAME TRADE NAME STRENGTH FORM APPLICANT NAME COOPER ZIMBABWE LTD 29 ANTONY V00739 AMITRAZ TRIATIX TR 50% M/M DIP; TOPICAL AVENUE MSASA HARARE ZIMBABWE COOPER ZIMBABWE LTD 29 ANTONY V00714 AMITRAZ ECTAZ EC DIP 12.5% M/V DIP; TOPICAL AVENUE MSASA HARARE ZIMBABWE NEWCASTLE CLONED VIRUS COOPER ZIMBABWE LTD 29 ANTONY V00782 HIPRAVIR-CLON VACCINE (LIVE) AVENUE MSASA HARARE ZIMBABWE COOPER ZIMBABWE LTD 29 ANTONY V00748 FIPRONIL FIPRONIL 9.7% W/V LIQUID; ORAL AVENUE MSASA HARARE ZIMBABWE NEWCASTLE DISEASE COOPER ZIMBABWE LTD 29 ANTONY V00781 HIPRAVIAR-BPL2 VACCINE (INACTIVATED) AVENUE MSASA HARARE ZIMBABWE INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE HIPRA GUMBORO- COOPER ZIMBABWE LTD 29 ANTONY V00785 VACCINE VIRUS (LIVE) CH/80 AVENUE MSASA HARARE ZIMBABWE INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE HIPRA GUMBORO- COOPER ZIMBABWE LTD 29 ANTONY V00784 VACCINE
    [Show full text]
  • Mashonaland Central Province Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee (Zimvac) 2020 Rural Livelihoods Assessment Report Foreword
    Mashonaland Central Province Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee (ZimVAC) 2020 Rural Livelihoods Assessment Report Foreword The Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee (ZimVAC) under the coordination of the Food and Nutrition Council, successfully undertook the 2020 Rural Livelihoods Assessment (RLA), the 20th since its inception. ZimVAC is a technical advisory committee comprised of representatives from Government, Development Partners, UN, NGOs, Technical Agencies and the Academia. In its endeavour to ‘promote and ensure adequate food and nutrition security for all people at all times’, the Government of Zimbabwe has continued to exhibit its commitment for reducing food and nutrition insecurity, poverty and improving livelihoods amongst the vulnerable populations in Zimbabwe through operationalization of Commitment 6 of the Food and Nutrition Security Policy (FNSP). As the country is grappling with the COVID-19 pandemic, this assessment was undertaken at an opportune time as there was an increasing need to urgently collect up to date food and nutrition security data to effectively support the planning and implementation of actions in a timely and responsive manner. The findings from the RLA will also go a long way in providing local insights into the full impact of the Corona virus on food and nutrition security in this country as the spread of the virus continues to evolve differently by continent and by country. In addition, the data will be of great use to Government, development partners, programme planners and communities in the recovery from the pandemic, providing timely information and helping monitor, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19 and any similar future pandemics. Thematic areas covered in this report include the following: education, food and income sources, income levels, expenditure patterns and food security, COVID-19 and gender based violence, among other issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Zimbabwe Assistance Program in Malaria April 2020
    Assessment of the Zimbabwe Assistance Program in Malaria April 2020 Assessment of the Zimbabwe Assistance Program in Malaria April 2020 This publication was produced with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of the Data for Impact Data for Impact (D4I) associate award University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 7200AA18LA00008, which is implemented by 123 West Franklin Street, Suite 330 the Carolina Population Center at the Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in Phone: 919-445-9350 | Fax: 919-445-9353 [email protected] partnership with Palladium International, LLC; http://www.data4impactproject.org ICF Macro, Inc.; John Snow, Inc.; and Tulane University. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. TRE-20-29 D4I ISBN 978-1-64232 -258 -3 Assessment of the Zimbabwe Assistance Program in Malaria 2 Acknowledgments This assessment was undertaken by Data for Impact (D4I), funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), in collaboration with the Zimbabwe National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) and the U.S. President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI)/Zimbabwe. The following people were involved in the assessment: Agneta Mbithi, Yazoumé Yé, Andrew Andrada, Cristina de la Torre, Logan Stuck, Joshua Yukich, Erin Luben, and Jessica Fehringer (D4I); and Brian Maguranyanga and Jaqueline Kabongo (M-Consulting Group). The assessment team thanks the people who generously shared their time, experiences, and ideas for the assessment, including the NMCP, led by its director, Dr. Joseph Mberikunashe; the provincial, district, and facility teams; the Zimbabwe Assistance Program in Malaria team; malaria implementing partners (IPs); and the outpatient and antenatal care patients at the health facilities visited.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Condition of Zambezi Valley Dry Forests and Thickets
    SSTTRRUUCCTTUURREE AANNDD CCOONNDDIITTIIOONN OOFF ZZAAMMBBEEZZII VVAALLLLEEYY DDRRYY FFOORREESSTTSS AANNDD TTHHIICCKKEETTSS January 2002 Published by The Zambezi Society STRUCTURE AND CONDITION OF ZAMBEZI VALLEY DRY FORESTS AND THICKETS by R.E. Hoare, E.F. Robertson & K.M. Dunham January 2002 Published by The Zambezi Society The Zambezi Society is a non- The Zambezi Society P O Box HG774 governmental membership Highlands agency devoted to the Harare conservation of biodiversity Zimbabwe and wilderness and the Tel: (+263-4) 747002/3/4/5 sustainable use of natural E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.zamsoc.org resources in the Zambezi Basin Zambezi Valley dry forest biodiversity i This report has a series of complex relationships with other work carried out by The Zambezi Society. Firstly, it forms an important part of the research carried out by the Society in connection with the management of elephants and their habitats in the Guruve and Muzarabani districts of Zimbabwe, and the Magoe district of Mozambique. It therefore has implications, not only for natural resource management in these districts, but also for the transboundary management of these resources. Secondly, it relates closely to the work being carried out by the Society and the Biodiversity Foundation for Africa on the identification of community-based mechanisms FOREWORD for the conservation of biodiversity in settled lands. Thirdly, it represents a critically important contribution to the Zambezi Basin Initiative for Biodiversity Conservation (ZBI), a collaboration between the Society, the Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, and Fauna & Flora International. The ZBI is founded on the acquisition and dissemination of good biodiversity information for incorporation into developmental and other planning initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Promotion of Climate-Resilient Lifestyles Among Rural Families in Gutu
    Promotion of climate-resilient lifestyles among rural families in Gutu (Masvingo Province), Mutasa (Manicaland Province) and Shamva (Mashonaland Central Province) Districts | Zimbabwe Sahara and Sahel Observatory 26 November 2019 Promotion of climate-resilient lifestyles among rural families in Gutu Project/Programme title: (Masvingo Province), Mutasa (Manicaland Province) and Shamva (Mashonaland Central Province) Districts Country(ies): Zimbabwe National Designated Climate Change Management Department, Ministry of Authority(ies) (NDA): Environment, Water and Climate Development Aid from People to People in Zimbabwe (DAPP Executing Entities: Zimbabwe) Accredited Entity(ies) (AE): Sahara and Sahel Observatory Date of first submission/ 7/19/2019 V.1 version number: Date of current submission/ 11/26/2019 V.2 version number A. Project / Programme Information (max. 1 page) ☒ Project ☒ Public sector A.2. Public or A.1. Project or programme A.3 RFP Not applicable private sector ☐ Programme ☐ Private sector Mitigation: Reduced emissions from: ☐ Energy access and power generation: 0% ☐ Low emission transport: 0% ☐ Buildings, cities and industries and appliances: 0% A.4. Indicate the result ☒ Forestry and land use: 25% areas for the project/programme Adaptation: Increased resilience of: ☒ Most vulnerable people and communities: 25% ☒ Health and well-being, and food and water security: 25% ☐ Infrastructure and built environment: 0% ☒ Ecosystem and ecosystem services: 25% A.5.1. Estimated mitigation impact 399,223 tCO2eq (tCO2eq over project lifespan) A.5.2. Estimated adaptation impact 12,000 direct beneficiaries (number of direct beneficiaries) A.5. Impact potential A.5.3. Estimated adaptation impact 40,000 indirect beneficiaries (number of indirect beneficiaries) A.5.4. Estimated adaptation impact 0.28% of the country’s total population (% of total population) A.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Violence Report November 2001
    ZIMBABWE HUMAN RIGHTS NGO FORUM POLITICAL VIOLENCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2001 December 2001 A report by the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum Summary Attacks on farm workers residing on invaded farms, ongoing since the end of February 2000, were reported to the Human Rights Forum in November. Since January this year, more than 70 000 farm workers have been displaced and countless others have been beaten and tortured whilst others lost their homes in arson attacks. Once again the ZRP was been found wanting in its protection and reaction to violations concerning farm workers and MDC supporters. In one recorded case, policemen in Kadoma arrived at the local Zanu-PF offices and witnessed the torture of two MDC members but left without rendering assistance. However 14 MDC members were arrested for the murder of Bulawayo war veteran’s chairman, Cain Nkala. In Harare members of the ZRP unlawfully arrested and tortured two MDC officials from Zengeza, accusing them of having had some involvement in Cain Nkala’s murder, despite their being in Harare at the time. The two were released without being charged having been interrogated about the operations of their party. Six deaths were recorded in November. A list of all deaths that have been reported since January 2001 is given at the end of the report. November 2001 Totals 2 Cumulative Totals January-November 2001 Sources: Amani Trust medical assessments, HR Forum legal statements, CFU reports and newspaper reports. Notes to Tables: The following categories have been changed and/or expanded due to the nature and the volume of crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security in Zimbabwe: Demand for African Indigenous Vegetables
    Paper submitted to the 5th AAAE Conference in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia “Transforming smallholder agriculture in Africa: The role of policy and governance” Food security in Zimbabwe: Demand for African indigenous vegetables Praxedis Dube Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands [email protected] Rico Ihle Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands Member of CRCPEG, Georg August-Universität Göttingen, Germany [email protected] Wim Heijman Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, The Netherlands [email protected] Food Security in Zimbabwe: Demand for African Indigenous Vegetables Abstract African Indigenous Vegetables (AIVs) are mostly leafy vegetables traditionally grown throughout Africa. Since they are domesticized versions of wild plants growing naturally throughout the continent, they are excellently adapted to the climate of the region they are growing in. Furthermore, they are rich in minerals and micronutrients and have therefore a large potential for alleviating hunger and malnutrition in Africa. Although they have a significant role in the traditional diets of many countries, economic development and change of values challenges the use of these vegetables. Little is known about consumer attitudes towards AIVs. Therefore, we analyse determinants of AIVs demand based on a consumer survey in Zimbabwe. The survey was conducted in four districts of varying prevalence of food insecurity. We analyse the relationship between household income and AIVs consumption. Second, we examine the effects of the geographical location of the household as an indicator of the socio-economic environment it is living it. Third, we explore consumers’ attitudes. Regions of lowest economic development and highest food insecurity show highest levels and variations in AIVs consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Journal of Rural and Community Development Journal of Rural and Community Development Bridging Policy and Practice for Livelihood Resilience in Rural Africa: Lessons from the Mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe Author: Admire Nyamwanza Citation: Nyamwanza, A. (2014). Bridging policy and practice for livelihood resilience in rural Africa: Lessons from the mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe. The Journal of Rural and Community Development, 9(4), 23-33. Publisher: Rural Development Institute, Brandon University. Editor: Dr. Doug Ramsey Open Access Policy: This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. ISSN: 1712-8277 © Journal of Rural and Community Development www.jrcd.ca Journal of Rural and Community Development Bridging Policy and Practice for Livelihood Resilience in Rural Africa: Lessons from the Mid-Zambezi Valley, Zimbabwe Admire Nyamwanza University of Cape Town Cape Town, South Africa [email protected] Abstract Building and enhancing livelihood resilience in most rural African communities is becoming a complex policy issue since the principal characteristics of most of these communities in contemporary times have become their increasingly differentiated nature and high socio-economic and environmental uncertainty due to multiple and reinforcing stresses and shocks. A major problem has been the glaring gulf between national policies and realities on the ground with a uniform approach being taken in the interpretation and implementation of general development and livelihoods policies on the ground in most countries. Yet the standard one-size fits-all policy approach is not possible as situations have become increasingly dynamic and conditions continue to differ from community to community.
    [Show full text]
  • Resident / Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the Use of CERF Funds
    Resident / Humanitarian Coordinator Report on the use of CERF funds RESIDENT / HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS ZIMBABWE RAPID RESPONSE FLOOD 2017 RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Bishow Parajuli REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY a. Please indicate when the After Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. Upon confirmation of the reporting deadline, each applicant Agency gathered inputs internally as well as from implementing partners, beneficiaries and national counterparts, as applicable. All relevant inputs were successively integrated in the report. The last version of the report was presented to the Humanitarian Country Team (HCT), for further discussion, as applicable. Additionally, each Agency shared the report with relevant stakeholders, prior to finalization. b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team and by cluster/sector coordinators as outlined in the guidelines. YES NO c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders as recommended in the guidelines (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, cluster/sector coordinators and members and relevant government counterparts)? YES NO 2 I. HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT TABLE 1: EMERGENCY ALLOCATION OVERVIEW (US$) Total amount required for the humanitarian response: $20,000,000 Source Amount CERF 1,585,201 Breakdown of total response COUNTRY-BASED POOL FUND (if applicable)
    [Show full text]
  • National Rapid Response Team Contacts
    National Rapid Response Team Contacts City/Town Contact Person Mobile Number Toll free Number Institution/Role Ace Ambulance +263 782999901-4 (0) 8080412 Harare ZRP (0242) 777777 ZRP Harare - Wilkins (0242) 741872 Wilkins Hosp Harare - Wilkins (0242) 740404 Wilkins Hosp Harare Dr Chonzi +263 712860777 Harare Dr Bara +263 734322293 Harare Dr Mudariki +263 772974314 Bulawayo Ms Sibanda +263 772677476 Bulawayo Dr Nyathi +263 776248128 Bulawayo Dr Ncube +263 772424812 Bulawayo Dr E Sibanda +263 772880581 Director Health Services Bulilima Dr Hapanyengwi +263 772907621 Beitbridge Dr Samhere +263 772386895 Bindura Mr Karisa +263 773271670 DMO Bikita Dr Mungwari +263 715411650 Centenary/Muzarabani Mr Kangundu +263 777366045 DNO Chegutu Dr Masvosva +263 772720190 Chiredzi Dr Dhlandhlara +263 775094360 Chirumanzu Dr S Maunga +263 772286685 (0) 8080435 Chirumanzu Mr Mukomberanwa +263 773 394 154 (0) 8080435 Chirumanzu Sr Mutumwa +263 772 911 454 (0) 8080435 Concession Dr Sosera +263 774736753 Gokwe North DR Chikara +263 775 428800 Gokwe North E Muchenje +263772 575437 City/Town Contact Person Mobile Number Toll free Number Institution/Role Gokwe South DR Mashoko +263 774 074739 Gokwe South D Mukotsi +263 774 002 934 Goromonzi Dr Karim +263 772347378 Guruve Zvomuya +263 772641444 DNO Gwanda Dr Gwarimbo +263 775735679 Gweru Dr Mhene +263 773258210 (0) 8080435 Gweru Provincial Hosp Toll free +263 787822276 (0) 8080435 Gweru Provincial Hospital Gweru& City G Shariwa +263 773 639 797 (0) 8080435 Gweru& City Mr Sekanhamo +263 715017014 (0) 8080435 Gweru&
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe National Dialogue Report on Findings
    Leave No One Behind: Zimbabwe National Dialogue Report on Findings Please include the following: survey results, data charts, input from each of the marginalized groups, overall analysis, geographic analysis, and key policy asks or suggestions for decision makers as well as for other stakeholders to implement. Guiding questions: 1) Who are the groups and communities in your country that are being left behind? Zimbabwe has gone through economic, social and governance turbulences for a prolonged period of time during the era of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 2000 to 2015. During this period the welfare of disenfranchised groups such as children, person with disabilities, the elderly, persons living with HIV and AIDS, women, youth and the rural community were deprived of the social services support, leading to further marginalizing. The poor performance of the economy saw the human development index worsen as the issues of health, education and life expectancy continued to deteriorate. Zimbabwe has remained in the low human development category, reaching its lowest in the recession period, 2000 to 2008, before marginally increasing under the recovery phase, 2009 to 2014. During this time, children drooped out of school and problem was worse for the girl child. Figure 1: Marginalized groups in Zimbabwe Source: NANGO survey 2016 for the Leave No One behind According to the survey, as shown in figure 1: Children were found to be the most vulnerable groups in the society, followed by persons with disabilities. These are the groups, which are left out the most in democratic processes. In addition, people with communicable diseases and women are also highly marginalized according to the survey results as shown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zambezi River Basin a Multi-Sector Investment Opportunities Analysis
    The Zambezi River Basin A Multi-Sector Investment Opportunities Analysis V o l u m e 4 Modeling, Analysis and Input Data THE WORLD BANK GROUP 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433 USA THE WORLD BANK The Zambezi River Basin A Multi-Sector Investment Opportunities Analysis Volume 4 Modeling, Analysis and input Data June 2010 THE WORLD BANK Water REsOuRcEs Management AfRicA REgion © 2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judge- ment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete in- formation to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]