DOCSLIB.ORG

12096-9781463900809.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12096-9781463900809.Pdf © 2011 International Monetary Fund August 2011 IMF Country Report No. 11/241 July 5, 2011 July 20, 2011 July 5, 2011 June 9, 2011 2011 January 29, 2001 Islamic Republic of Iran: 2011 Article IV Consultation—Staff Report; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Iran Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. In the context of the 2011 Article IV consultation with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the following documents have been released and are included in this package: The staff report for the 2011 Article IV consultation, prepared by a staff team of the IMF, following discussions that ended on June 9, 2011, with the officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran on economic developments and policies. Based on information available at the time of these discussions, the staff report was completed on July 5, 2011. The views expressed in the staff report are those of the staff team and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Board of the IMF. A Public Information Notice (PIN) summarizing the views of the Executive Board as expressed during its July 20, 2011 discussion of the staff report that concluded the Article IV consultation. A statement by the Executive Director for the Islamic Republic of Iran. The document listed below has been or will be separately released. Selected Issues Paper The policy of publication of staff reports and other documents allows for the deletion of market-sensitive information. Copies of this report are available to the public from International Monetary Fund Publication Services 700 19th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20431 Telephone: (202) 623-7430 Telefax: (202) 623-7201 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.imf.org International Monetary Fund Washington, D.C. ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Staff Report for the 2011 Article IV Consultation Prepared by the Staff Representatives for the 2011 Consultation with the Islamic Republic of Iran Approved by Ratna Sahay and David D. Marston July 5, 2011 Discussions: Held in Tehran May 28–June 9, 2011. The mission met with H.E. Seyyed Shamseddin Hosseini, Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance; H.E. Dr. Mahmoud Bahmani, Governor of the Central Bank and other representatives from the public and private sectors and academics. A press release issued at the conclusion of the discussions can be found at: http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2011/pr11228.htm Staff Team: The mission comprised Mr. Dominique Guillaume (Head), Messrs. Ozgur Demirkol, Gabriel Sensenbrenner, Roman Zytek, (all MCD) and Ms. Majdeline El Rayess (STA). Mr. Jafar Mojarrad (OED) participated in policy discussions. Exchange Arrangement: The Islamic Republic of Iran maintains a de jure managed floating arrangement against a basket of currencies. With effect from September 6, 2004, the Islamic Republic of Iran accepted the obligations under Article VIII, Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Fund’s Articles of Agreement. Iran maintains one exchange restriction and one multiple currency practice subject to Fund jurisdiction under Article VIII, Sections 2(a) and 3 (see Informational Annex). Past Surveillance: The 2009 Article IV Consultation was concluded on Feb 3, 2010. The Public Information Notice of the Executive Board’s discussion is available at http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pn/2010/pn1024.htm Statistics: Data is broadly adequate for surveillance: The authorities have indicated their interest in participating in the General Data Dissemination Standard (GDDS). ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution 2 Contents Page Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................3 I. Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 II. Recent Economic Developments and Outlook..................................................................... 5 A. Recent Economic Developments ..................................................................................... 5 B. Medium-Term Outlook .................................................................................................. 10 III. Policy Discussions ............................................................................................................ 11 A. Preserving Macroeconomic Stability in the Near Term ................................................. 11 B. Ensuring the Transition to a Market-Based Economy to Foster Growth and Employment .......................................................................................................... 12 C. Strengthening the Financial Sector to Sustain Economic Development ........................ 16 IV. Staff Appraisal .................................................................................................................. 18 Text Table Medium-Term Scenario, 2008/09–2016/17 .............................................................................10 Boxes 1. Initial Impact of the Targeted Subsidy Reform .............................................................4 2. Is there a Price Bubble in the Tehran Stock Exchange? ................................................9 Figures 1. Macroeconomic Indicators, 2000/01–2010/11 ..............................................................6 2. Macroeconomic and Price Developments, 2005/06–2010/11 .......................................7 3. Distribution of Oil Revenue for 2011/12 .......................................................................8 4. Exports, Employment and Productivity .......................................................................13 5. Demographics, Labor Market and Business Environment ..........................................14 Tables 1. Selected Macroeconomic Indicators, 2007/08–2011/12 ..............................................21 2. Balance of Payments, 2007/08–2016/17 ......................................................................22 3a. Statement of Government Operations 2007/08–2011/12 (in billions of Rials) ...........23 3b. Financial Balance Sheet 2008/09–2010/11 ..................................................................24 4. Statement of Government Operations 2007/08–2011/12 ............................................25 5. Central Bank Balance Sheet, 2007/08–2011/12 ..........................................................26 6. Monetary Survey, 2007/08–2011/12 ...........................................................................27 7. Vulnerability Indicators, 2007/08–2010/11 .................................................................28 Appendices I. Exchange Rate Assessment ..........................................................................................29 II. Migration of Iran Fiscal Presentation into the GFSM 2001 Presentation ....................31 ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution 3 Executive Summary Background and outlook: Growth recovered on the strength of international oil prices, strong rebound in agricultural sector and rapid credit expansion. Inflation was contained while fiscal and external positions improved. The launch of the subsidy reform in December 2010 has increased inflation temporarily and is expected to result in a temporary slowdown of economic growth. While high oil prices and efficiency gains resulting from the subsidy reform should support rapid economic recovery, an accommodative policy stance could lead to high inflation and derail reform efforts. Policies priorities: Key priorities are to (i) maintain short term macroeconomic stability to support the reform process; (ii) transition further to a market-based economy to foster growth and support job creation; and, (iii) strengthen the financial sector. Staff Recommendations: Coordinated and tight credit and fiscal policies are essential to maintain macroeconomic stability in the aftermath of the subsidy reform. The authorities should continue to flexibly manage the exchange rate, and maintain a unified exchange rate. Achieving higher growth and creating new jobs will require restructuring the corporate sector, supporting the creation of new enterprises, removing labor market frictions, encouraging foreign investment, and accelerating the ongoing privatization process. Addressing the banking sector’s large NPLs portfolio, and strengthening capital adequacy and profitability are essential to allow the banking sector to support growth. Authorities’ Views: Steadfast implementation of the subsidy reform will continue, while preserving macroeconomic stability in the transition period, including through limiting central bank credit to banks and possible increasing interest rates. Corporate restructuring might require more subsidized loans and financing. Recapitalizing public banks, further reducing NPLs, enhancing central bank supervision, and introducing a deposit guarantee fund are important elements of the banking reform strategy. ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution 4 I. OVERVIEW 1. Iran is benefitting from the rebound in international oil prices. With the break- even price for the budget and current account in 2010/11 at $75 per barrel and $60 per barrel respectively, the increase in oil price to $80 per barrel on average, has helped improve the current account and budget surplus, and maintain comfortable international
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition
    Iran V: Sanctions Competition January 4, 2013 0 U.S. AND IRANIAN STRATEGIC COMPETITION Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change Anthony H. Cordesman, Bryan Gold, Sam Khazai, and Bradley Bosserman April 19, 2013 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Note: This report is will be updated. Please provide comments and suggestions to [email protected] Iran V: Sanctions Competition April, 19 2013 I Executive Summary This report analyzes four key aspects of US and Iranian strategic competition - sanctions, energy, arms control, and regime change. Its primary focus is on the ways in which the sanctions applied to Iran have changed US and Iranian competition since the fall of 2011. This escalation has been spurred by the creation of a series of far stronger US unilateral sanctions and the EU‘s imposition of equally strong sanctions – both of which affect Iran‘s ability to export, its financial system and its overall economy. It has been spurred by Iran‘s ongoing missile deployments and nuclear program, as reported in sources like the November 2011 IAEA report that highlights the probable military dimensions of Iran‘s nuclear program. And, by Iranian rhetoric, by Iranian threats to ―close‖ the Gulf to oil traffic; increased support of the Quds Force and pro-Shiite governments and non-state actors; and by incidents like the Iranian-sponsored assassination plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US, an Iranian government instigated mob attack on the British Embassy in Tehran on November 30, 2011, and the Iranian-linked attacks against Israeli diplomats.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration Perspectives on Imple- Menting New Economic Sanctions One Year Later
    S. HRG. 112–332 ADDRESSING POTENTIAL THREATS FROM IRAN: ADMINISTRATION PERSPECTIVES ON IMPLE- MENTING NEW ECONOMIC SANCTIONS ONE YEAR LATER HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON EXAMINING THE GLOBAL IMPACT OF THE IRAN REGIME SANCTIONS AND EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE IRAN SANCTIONS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND DIVESTMENT ACT OCTOBER 13, 2011 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–564 PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota, Chairman JACK REED, Rhode Island RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York MIKE CRAPO, Idaho ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey BOB CORKER, Tennessee DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JIM DEMINT, South Carolina SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DAVID VITTER, Louisiana JON TESTER, Montana MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska HERB KOHL, Wisconsin PATRICK J. TOOMEY, Pennsylvania MARK R. WARNER, Virginia MARK KIRK, Illinois JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon JERRY MORAN, Kansas MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi KAY HAGAN, North Carolina DWIGHT FETTIG, Staff Director WILLIAM D. DUHNKE, Republican Staff Director CHARLES YI, Chief Counsel PATRICK GRANT, Counsel COLIN MCGINNIS, Professional Staff Member JOHN O’HARA, Republican Senior Investigative Counsel ANDREW OLMEM, Republican Chief Counsel DAWN RATLIFF, Chief Clerk RIKER VERMILYE, Hearing Clerk SHELVIN SIMMONS, IT Director JIM CROWELL, Editor (II) CONTENTS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2011 Page Opening statement of Chairman Johnson ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US and Iranian Strategic Competition: Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control
    Burke Chair in Strategy U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change By Bryan Gold, Anthony H. Cordesman, and Chloe Coughlin-Schulte July 22, 2013 Request for comments: This report is a draft that will be turned into an electronic book. Comments and suggested changes would be greatly appreciated. Please send any comments to Anthony H. Cordsman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, at [email protected]. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Iran: Sanctions Competition July 22, 2013 ii Acknowledgements This analysis was written with the assistance of Sam Khazai and Bradley Bosserman. Iran: Sanctions Competition July 22, 2013 iii Executive Summary This report analyzes four key aspects of US and Iranian strategic competition - sanctions, energy, arms control, and regime change. Its primary focus is on the ways in which the sanctions applied to Iran have changed US and Iranian competition since the fall of 2011. This escalation has been spurred by the creation of a series of far stronger US unilateral sanctions and the EU’s imposition of equally strong sanctions – both of which affect Iran’s ability to export, its financial system, and its overall economy. It has been spurred by by Iran’s ongoing missile deployments and nuclear program, as reported in sources like the November 2011 IAEA report that highlights the probable military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program. Additional contributing factors include Iranian rhetoric, Iranian threats to ―close‖ the Gulf to oil traffic; increased support of the Quds Force, pro-Shiite governments, and non-state actors; and incidents like the Iranian-sponsored assassination plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US, an Iranian government instigated mob attack on the British Embassy in Tehran on November 30, 2011, and the Iranian-linked attacks against Israeli diplomats.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Web: the Making and Unmaking of Iran Sanctions
    Spider Web: The Making and Unmaking of Iran Sanctions Middle East Report N°138 | 25 February 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Weaving the Net ............................................................................................................... 5 A. Unilateral U.S. Sanctions ........................................................................................... 5 B. Coordinated Multilateral Sanctions .......................................................................... 12 C. United Nations Sanctions .......................................................................................... 14 D. Shell Games: Enforcement and Evasion ................................................................... 15 III. The Impact of Sanctions ................................................................................................... 19 A. Impact on the Nuclear and Missile Programs ........................................................... 19 B. Impact on the Energy Sector ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Iran
    Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center Spotlight on Iran June 2010—Khordad 1389 Week of June 3-10, 2010 Editor: Raz Zimmt Highlights of the week: Speech of revolution leader’s grandson Hassan Khomeini interrupted by regime supporters on Khomeini’s death anniversary Power struggles between government and Majles reach new heights Iran TV presents: Iranian nuclear scientist who “disappeared” in Saudi Arabia talks about his abduction by American and Saudi intelligence services Growing concern over euro decline Debate on economic figures continues: have foreign investments in Iran increased or decreased? Pictures of the week: child labor in glass factory 1 Speech of revolution leader’s grandson Hassan Khomeini interrupted by regime supporters on Khomeini’s death anniversary In an unprecedented behavior, regime-supporting demonstrators prevented Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of the Islamic revolution founder, from finishing his speech at a ceremony marking the 21st death anniversary of Ayatollah Khomeini held last Friday (June 4) at the late leader’s mausoleum south of Tehran. The speech made by Khomeini, affiliated with the reformist camp, was interrupted by demonstrators who chanted slogans against him and the reformist opposition. “Death to those who oppose the rule of the religious jurisprudent”, “Death to Mousavi”, and “The grandson of Ruhollah [Khomeini] is Hassan Nasrallah” were only some of those slogans. Khomeini was unable to continue his speech due to the interruptions. He made several attempts to calm the public, asked the demonstrators to let him continue speaking, and even called on them to pray for the memory of Ayatollah Khomeini in an attempt to defuse the situation.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition: Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control
    Iran V: Sanctions Competition January 4, 2013 I U.S. AND IRANIAN STRATEGIC COMPETITION Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change Anthony H. Cordesman, Bryan Gold, Sam Khazai, and Bradley Bosserman January 22, 2013 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Note: This report is will be updated. Please provide comments and suggestions to [email protected] Iran V: Sanctions Competition January 22, 2013 II Executive Summary This report analyzes four key aspects of US and Iranian strategic competition - sanctions, energy, arms control, and regime change. Its primary focus is on the ways in which the sanctions applied to Iran have changed US and Iranian competition since the fall of 2011. This escalation has been spurred by the creation of a series of far stronger US unilateral sanctions and the EU’s imposition of equally strong sanctions – both of which affect Iran’s ability to export, its financial system and its overall economy. It has been spurred by Iran’s ongoing missile deployments and nuclear program, as reported in sources like the November 2011 IAEA report that highlights the probable military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program. And, by Iranian rhetoric, by Iranian threats to “close” the Gulf to oil traffic; increased support of the Al Quds force and pro-Shiite governments and non-state actors; and by incidents like the Iranian-sponsored assassination plot against the Saudi Ambassador to the US, an Iranian government instigated mob attack on the British Embassy in Tehran on November 30, 2011, and the Iranian-linked attacks against Israeli diplomats.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies Website of the Expert Community of Belarus “Our Opinion”
    1 BELARUSIAN INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES WEBSITE OF THE EXPERT COMMUNITY OF BELARUS “OUR OPINION” BELARUSIAN YEARBOOK 2009 A survey and analysis of developments in the Republic of Belarus in 2009 Minsk, 2010 2 BELARUSIAN YEARBOOK 2009 Compiled and edited by: Anatoly Pankovsky and Valeria Kostyugova English version translated by Volha Hapeyeva, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Tatsiana Tulush English version edited by Max Nuijens Scientific reviewers and consultants: Miroslav Kollar, Institute for Public Affairs, Program Director of the Slovak annual Global Report; Vitali Silitski, Doctor of Philosophy, Director of the Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies (BISS, Lithuania); Pavel Daneiko, Institute for Privatization and Management; Andrei Vardomatski, Doctor of Sociology, NOVAK laboratory; Petr Martsev, BISS Board member; Ales Antipenko, PhD in philosophy, head of the Belarusian Collegium; Oleg Manaev, Doctor of Sociology, the Independent Institute of Socio.Economic and Political Studies (IISEPS); Vladimir Dunaev, PhD in philosophy, website Nashe Mneniye (“Our opinion”); Aleksei Pikulik, Doctor of Political Science, St. Petersburg Humanitarian University. The yearbook is published with support of The German Marshall Fund of the United States ISSN 1822.4091 © Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies 3 CONTENTS Editorial foreword 6 STATE AUTHORITY Vital Silitsky Presidential administration an uncertain new line 8 Zmicier Kuhlei Representative power branch 17 Vadim Sehovitch Government: A crisis test 25 Andrei Kazakevich Judicial Power: Relative
    [Show full text]
  • Iran--Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change
    Iran—Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change Change and Regime Arms Control, Iran—Sanctions, Energy, Iran— Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime CORDESMAN, GOLD, GOLD, CORDESMAN, 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW| Washington DC 20036 t. (202) 887-0200 | f. (202) 775-3199 | www.csis.org Change AND ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD COUGHLIN-SHULTE Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Lanham, MD 20706 t. (800) 462-6420 | f. (301) 429-5749 | www.rowman.com authors Cover photo: Photo by Kaveh Seyedahmadian. http://www.flickr.com/photos/samanvari/3388535986/. Anthony H. Cordesman ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Bryan Gold ISBN 978-1-4422-2777-4 Chloe Coughlin-Schulte Ë|xHSLEOCy227774z v*:+:!:+:! A Report of the CSIS Burke Chair in Strategy January 2014 Blank Iran—Sanctions, Energy, Arms Control, and Regime Change Authors Anthony H. Cordesman Bryan Gold Chloe Coughlin-Schulte A Report of the CSIS Burke Chair in Strategy January 2014 ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Weighing Benefits and Costs of International Sanctions Against Iran
    Weighing Benefits and Costs of International Sanctions Against Iran Weighing Benefits and Costs of International Sanctions Against Iran Dear Fellow Citizens, As a group of interested former officials of the United States Government and professionals in the field of U.S. national security, we support the publication of the attached report, “Weighing Benefits and Costs of International Sanctions Against Iran.” We applaud the drafters of this paper and their goal of contributing an objective, nonpartisan analysis to a complex and important policy discussion. While some of us made contributions to the paper, we do not necessarily agree with every word This paper offers a fact-based analysis that we hope will in this properly detailed and balanced report. provide Americans sufficient understanding to weigh the We associate ourselves with this paper in the belief that it will contribute balance between the benefits and costs of using international to informed public debate on a critical challenge to American interests in the world. We also believe that it is consistent with President Obama’s sanctions against Iran—and the wisdom to find the right policy of maintaining pressure on Iran through sanctions while holding time to negotiate. open the possibility of reaching a political solution, and that it does not rule out the use of military force as a last resort to constrain Iran from From the signers of this document building a nuclear weapon. The paper does not advocate for or against sanctions; nor does it make specific policy recommendations. It seeks fact-based objectivity whenever possible in describing some of the implications for American interests of the international sanctions regime against Iran.
    [Show full text]