DOCSLIB.ORG

Press Standards, Privacy and Libel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Press Standards, Privacy and Libel For Distribution to CPs House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport C o m m itte e Press standards, privacy and libel Second R eport o f Session 2009-10 V o l u m e I Report, together w ith form al m inutes Ordered by the House o f Commons to be printed 9 February 2010 HC 362-1 Incorporating HC 275-i-xv, Session 2008-09 Published on 24 February 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 5 2 6 MODI 00045526 For Distribution to CPs The Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr John Whittingdale MP {Conservative, M aldon and East Chelm sford) (Chairman) Mr Peter Ainsworth MP {Conservative, East Surrey) Janet Anderson MP {Labour, Rossendale and Darwen) Mr Philip Davies MP {Conservative, Shipley) Paul Farrelly MP {Labour, Newcastle-under-Lym e) Mr Mike Hall MP {Labour, W eaver Vale) Alan Keen MP {Labour, Feltham and Heston) Rosemary McKenna MP {Labour, Cum bernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Adam Price MP (Plaid Cym ru, Carm arthen East and Dinefw r) Mr Adrian Sanders MP (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Tom Watson MP {Labour, W est Brom wich East) The following members were also members of the committee during the inquiry: Mr Nigel Evans MP {Conservative, Ribble Valley) Helen Southworth MP {Labour, W arrington South) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/cmscom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Tracey Garratty (Clerk), Arun Chopra (Second Clerk), Elizabeth Bradshaw (inquiry Manager), Jackie Recardo (Senior Committee Assistant), Ronnie Jefferson (Committee Assistant), Keith Pryke (Office Support Assistant) and Laura Humble (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerks of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SWIP 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6188; the Committee's email address is [email protected] 5 2 7 MODI 00045527 For Distribution to CPs Contents Report P a g e Sum m ary 5 1 Introduction 2 Privacy and breach of confidence 12 Introduction 12 The Human Rights Act 13 Section 12 of the Act 14 Section 12 in practice 16 Max Mosley and the News o f the World 19 Is it time to legislate on privacy? 23 Mr Justice Eady and privacy law 25 Compulsory pre-notification 28 Super-injunctions 31 Breach of confidence 34 3 Libel and Press Freedom 36 The development of our libel laws 36 Bringing and defending a libel action in the UK 38 Early hearings on meaning 38 Defending libel actions-justification and the burden of proof 39 Fair comment 40 Privilege 41 The 'responsible journalism' defence 41 Corporations and defamation 46 Jurisdiction 48 The international context 52 The internet and the 'repeat publication' rule 56 Criminal libel 59 4 Costs 61 Introduction 61 Attempts to control costs 64 Other inquiries 65 Costs Capping 67 Offer of Amends 69 Hourly rates 70 Conditional Fee Agreements 72 5 Press standards 77 Introduction 77 Financial pressures 77 Newspaper headlines 80 The case of the McCanns 83 5 2 8 MODI 00045528 For Distribution to CPs The events 83 What went wrong? 84 The role o f th e PCC 87 Lessons learned? 89 Suicide reporting in the media 91 The case of Bridgend 92 Phone-hacking and blagging 96 Fresh allegations 96 The Miskiw contract 97 The 'for Neville' email 98 The door-knock 99 Who knew about the phone-hacking? 101 The Goodman and Mulcaire settlements 104 The Taylor settlement 105 The actions of the police 106 Operation Motorman 109 Conclusions regarding phone-hacking and blagging 113 Self-regulation o f th e Press 115 The Press Complaints Commission 115 The PCC and fines 119 The independence of the PCC 123 A more proactive approach? 124 The authority of the PCC 125 The PCC's statistics 127 'Due prominence' 129 The future of the PCC 130 Conclusions and recommendations 131 A n nex 147 Glossary of terms 147 A p pen d ix 149 Press Complaints Commission Code of Practice 149 Formal Minutes 155 W itnesses 160 List of written evidence 162 List of unprinted written evidence 164 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 166 529 MODI 00045529 For Distribution to CPs Sum m ary The UK is a country which values the freedom of its press to report and comment on events, public figures and institutions, to be critical of them and to be a platform for dissenting views. These are important freedoms which are not available in all countries. In return, the public expects that members of the UK press will uphold certain standards, be mindful of the rights of those who are written about, and, as far as possible, be accurate in what they report. The current system of self-regulation of the press, under the auspices of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), came into force in 1991, following the Calcutt inquiry of 1990. Since then there have been times when events have led the public and politicians to question the integrity of the methods used by the press, and the competence of the PCC as an industry regulator. Our inquiry was primarily prompted by the persistent libelling by the UK press of the McCann family and others, following the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine in Portugal in May 2007, the limited intervention of the PCC and its failure to launch an inquiry into the industry’s failings in the case. We also sought to address concerns that the operation of libel laws in England and Wales and the impact of costs were stifling press freedom in the UK, as well as considering the balance between personal privacy and press freedom. This Report is the product of the longest, most complex and wide-ranging inquiry this Committee has undertaken. Our aim has been to arrive at recommendations that, if implemented, would help to restore the delicate balances associated with the freedom of the press. Individual proposals we make will have their critics - that is inevitable - but we are convinced that, taken together, our recommendations represent a constmctive way forward for a free and healthy UK press in the years to come. Privacy and breach o f confidence In this section we examine the case brought by Max Mosley against the News of the World, as well as considering other recent case law and the impact of injunctions and super-injunctions on freedom of speech. We also comment on the operation of the Human Rights Act, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights in UK law. The European Convention includes both the right to freedom of expression and the right to a private and family life, rights that must be balanced against each other. That being the case, we make a number of recommendations designed to ensure that the balance between the two Convention rights is appropriate. We do not consider however that it would be right, at this time, to legislate on privacy. We rule out mandatory pre-notification. We recommend however that the PCC should amend its Code to include a requirement that journalists should normally notify the subject of their articles prior to publication, subject to a ‘public interest’ test, and should provide guidance for journalists and editors on pre-notifying in the Editors’ Codebook. We also recommend that failure to pre-notify should be an aggravating factor in assessing damages. To balance this, we recommend the development of a fast track procedure for a final decision where an interim injunction banning publication of a story has been granted, or where a court refusal has been appealed. We comment on the recent events surrounding the imposition of a ‘super-injunction’ obtained by Trafigura, a company trading in oil, base metals and other items, preventing the publication of a report on alleged dumping of toxic waste in the Ivory Coast, and subsequent debate over 530 MODI 00045530 For Distribution to CPs reporting of Parliamentary Questions relating to that report. We express our concern at the confusion over the level of protection provided to the reporting of Parliamentary proceedings by the Parliamentary Papers Act 1840 and recommend that these important elements of freedom of speech should be put beyond doubt through the enactment of a modern statute. We also recommend that the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice act on concerns regarding injunctions more generally in cases of both breach of privacy and confidence. Libel and press freedom In this section we focus on the operation of libel law in England and Wales and its impact on press reporting. We consider important recent cases and developments since the 1996 Defamation Act, including ‘responsible journalism’, the government’s consultation on the issue of‘multiple publication’ in the internet age and legislation to abolish criminal libel. We consider the fairness of the ‘burden of proof being on the defendant, but in relation to individuals conclude that in order to satisfy natural justice the defendant should still be required to provide the proof of his allegations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quiet Revolution
    A quiet revolution The moral economies shaping journalists’ use of NGO-provided multimedia in mainstream news about Africa Katherine Wright Goldsmiths, University of London A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD in Media and Communications 2014 1 Declaration I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person, nor material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. 2 Acknowledgements With grateful thanks to my study participants for their time, trust and candour - without you there would be no study. I also want to thank my supervisor, Natalie Fenton, who manages to combine the sharpest of minds with the warmest of hearts. Your support has meant so much to me over the past few years. The encouragement and constructive criticism of others at Goldsmiths has also been invaluable, especially Aeron Davis, Des Freedman and Gholam Khiabany, who all kindly read drafts of chapters for me. Next, I want to note my debt to my dear colleagues in Journalism at the University of Roehampton. I especially want to thank Ros Coward, whose passionate belief that practitioners should ‘get into’ research started me off down this route in the first place. In addition, the words of advice and support from colleagues at other institutions have been really helpful, especially those of Mel Bunce, Lilie Chouliaraki, Glenda Cooper, Nick Couldry, Shani Orgad, Chris Paterson, Martin Scott, Helen Yanacopulos and Silvio Waisbord.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikileaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL PATRICIA L. BELLIA WikiLeaks and the Institutional Framework for National Security Disclosures ABSTRACT. WikiLeaks' successive disclosures of classified U.S. documents throughout 2010 and 2011 invite comparison to publishers' decisions forty years ago to release portions of the Pentagon Papers, the classified analytic history of U.S. policy in Vietnam. The analogy is a powerful weapon for WikiLeaks' defenders. The Supreme Court's decision in the Pentagon Papers case signaled that the task of weighing whether to publicly disclose leaked national security information would fall to publishers, not the executive or the courts, at least in the absence of an exceedingly grave threat of harm. The lessons of the PentagonPapers case for WikiLeaks, however, are more complicated than they may first appear. The Court's per curiam opinion masks areas of substantial disagreement as well as a number of shared assumptions among the Court's members. Specifically, the Pentagon Papers case reflects an institutional framework for downstream disclosure of leaked national security information, under which publishers within the reach of U.S. law would weigh the potential harms and benefits of disclosure against the backdrop of potential criminal penalties and recognized journalistic norms. The WikiLeaks disclosures show the instability of this framework by revealing new challenges for controlling the downstream disclosure of leaked information and the corresponding likelihood of "unintermediated" disclosure by an insider; the risks of non-media intermediaries attempting to curtail such disclosures, in response to government pressure or otherwise; and the pressing need to prevent and respond to leaks at the source. AUTHOR.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Conflict Through Cultural Dialogue
    CPA UK Lunchtime Lecture Series Preventing Conflict through Cultural Dialogue Mr Adrian Sanders MP, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Adrian Sanders was born in Paignton in 1959 and attended schools in Paignton and Torquay. He was elected to Torbay Council as a Liberal Democrat in 1984. He worked for party leader Paddy Ashdown in the early 1990s, standing unsuccessfully for the Torbay parliamentary constituency in 1992. Standing again in 1997, Mr Sanders won the seat with a majority of 12 and continues to serve as MP for Torbay to this day, currently with a majority of 4,078. He has been Chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Diabetes since 1998 and serves on the Select Committee for Culture, Media and Sport. From 2006 to 2010 he was Liberal Democrat Deputy Whip and is currently Vice-Chairman of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. www.adriansanders.org Mr Samuel Jones, Demos Associate and co-author of ‘Cultural Diplomacy’ Sam's primary interests are culture, the arts and international and intercultural communication. He is a co-author of ‘Cultural Diplomacy’ and has developed work on the international activity of cultural organisations, the subject of an article 'Diplomacy and Skills for the Cultural Age'. Prior to this, Sam contributed to the Demos collection, Production Values, which features his piece on 'The New Cultural Professionals', and also co-wrote Knowledge and Inspiration, which looked at the contribution of museums, libraries and archives to the cultural and social life of the UK. He has also written on Global English and conservation and the material world, the UK Film sector and the role of conversation in the public realm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Puzzle of Media Power: Notes Toward a Materialist Approach
    International Journal of Communication 8 (2014), 319–334 1932–8036/20140005 The Puzzle of Media Power: Notes Toward a Materialist Approach DES FREEDMAN Goldsmiths, University of London In any consideration of the relationship between communication and global power shifts and of the ways in which the media are implicated in new dynamics of power, the concept of media power is frequently invoked as a vital agent of social and communicative change. This article sets out to develop a materialist approach to media power that acknowledges its role in social reproduction through the circulation of symbolic goods but suggests that we also need an understanding of media power that focuses on the relationships between actors, institutions, and contexts that organize the allocation of material resources concentrated in the media. It is hardly controversial to suggest that the media are powerful social actors, but what is the nature of this power? Does it refer to people, institutions, processes, or capacities? If we are to understand the role of communication as it relates to contemporary circumstances of neoliberalism, globalization, cosmopolitanism, and digitalization (which this special section sets out to consider), then we need a definition of media power that is sufficiently complex and robust to evaluate its channels, networks, participants, and implications. This article suggests that, just as power is not a tangible property visible only in its exercise, media power is best conceived as a relationship between different interests engaged in struggles for a range of objectives that include legitimation, influence, control, status, and, increasingly, profit. Strangely, one of the clearest metaphors for media power in recent years involves a horse.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Murdoch Takeover: New Evidence Indicating the Need for a Further “Fit and Proper” Review
    Before the Murdoch takeover: new evidence indicating the need for a further “Fit and Proper” review AVAAZ, 8th March 2017. Submission for Karen Bradley, Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport Introduction An acquisition of Sky Plc. by 21st Century Fox (21CF) would result in a major expansion of the influence of the Murdoch Family Trust (MFT) over Sky. In 2012 Ofcom was highly critical of the role of James Murdoch who was CEO and Chairman of News International during the period of criminal and other reprehensible conduct at that organisation. This submission details a long list of wrongdoings and criminal misgovernance that has emerged since Ofcom reviewed the licenses held by BSkyB in 2012. It also draws attention to an unfolding sexual harassment epidemic being unearthed at Fox News in the US. The Secretary of State notes in her 6th March 2017 letter1 to 21CF and Sky that 21CF’s record of compliance with the broadcasting code might reflect on the culture or corporate governance at 21CF. The “huge failings of corporate governance” at News Corporation, the precursor company to 21CF were noted in the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on News International and Phone Hacking and the Secretary of State herself acknowledges that James Murdoch’s actions during this time was a “failure of corporate governance.” The shocking scale of corporate misgovernance and criminal conduct make it incumbent upon the Secretary of State to exercise her powers under Section 58(3) of the Communications Act 2003, to refer the Sky bid on broader public interest grounds than those she currently says she is minded to exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Paul Farrelly MP: Resolution Letter 3 Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Chris Tomkinson, 22 February 2018 3
    RECTIFICATION 1 Contents Summary 2 Mr Paul Farrelly MP: Resolution Letter 3 Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Chris Tomkinson, 22 February 2018 3 5 Written evidence 4 1. Letter from Mr Chris Tomkinson to the Commissioner, received 23 November 2017 4 2. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Paul Farrelly MP, 23 November 2017 4 3. Letter from Mr Paul Farrelly MP to the Commissioner, 11 December 2017 7 10 4. Letter from the Commissioner to the Director of Accommodation and Logistics, 12 December 2017 11 5. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Paul Farrelly MP, 12 December 2017 12 6. Letter from the Director to the Commissioner, 14 December 2017 12 7. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Paul Farrelly MP, 19 December 2017 13 15 8. Letter from Mr Paul Farrelly MP to the Commissioner, 11 January 2018 14 9. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Paul Farrelly MP, 23 January 2018 16 10. Letter from Mr Paul Farrelly MP to the Commissioner, 1 February 2018 18 11. Letter from the Commissioner to Mr Paul Farrelly MP, 6 February 2018 19 RECTIFICATION 2 Summary The allegation concerned the alleged misuse of House-provided stationery immediately before the Dissolution of the 2015 Parliament. I found that in writing to constituents to provide details of how he might be contacted during the 5 Dissolution period the Member breached paragraph 15 of the Code of Conduct for Members. He did so by sending the letter to all constituents who had contacted him during the 2015 Parliament and by including text which was party political in tone and content.
    [Show full text]
  • African Innovations in Pre-Trial Justice Jean Redpath 2015 1
    African Innovations in Pre-trial Justice Jean Redpath 2015 1 © Dullah Omar Institute, 2015 This publication was made possible with the financial assistance of the Open Society Foundations. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Dullah Omar Institute and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the Open Society Foundations. Copyright in this article is vested with the Dullah Omar Institute, University of Western Cape. No part of this article may be reproduced in whole or in part without the express permission, in writing, of the Dullah Omar Institute. Civil Society Prison Reform Initiative (CSPRI) c/o Dullah Omar Institute University of the Western Cape Private Bag X17 7535 SOUTH AFRICA www.cspri.org.za The aim of CSPRI is to improve the human rights of people deprived of their liberty through research-based advocacy and collaborative efforts with civil society structures. The key areas that CSPRI examines are developing and strengthening the capacity of civil society and civilian institutions related to corrections; promoting improved prison governance; promoting the greater use of non-custodial sentencing as a mechanism for reducing overcrowding in prisons; and reducing the rate of recidivism through improved reintegration programmes. CSPRI supports these objectives by undertaking independent critical research; raising awareness of decision makers and the public; disseminating information and capacity building. REPORT PREPARED BY JEAN REDPATH FOR PROMOTING PRE-TRIAL JUSTICE IN AFRICA (PPJA), A PROJECT OF THE CIVIL SOCIETY PRISON REFORM INITIATIVE (CSPRI) OF THE DULLAH OMAR INSTITUTE, UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE 1 AFRICAN INNOVATIONS IN PRE-TRIAL JUSTICE Contents Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Bulletinprimary.Indd
    A PUBLICATION OF THE SILHA CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW | SUMMER 2011 Not Just a ‘Rogue Reporter’: ‘Phone Hacking’ Scandal Spreads Far and Wide The so-called “phone hacking” scandal has led to more than Murdoch Closes News of the World and a dozen arrests, resignations by top News Corp. executives Speaks to Parliament while Public and British police, the launching of several new investigations Outrage Grows over Tabloid Crime, into News Corp. business practices, and pressured Murdoch to retreat from a business deal to purchase the remaining Collusion, and Corruption portion of BSkyB that he did not own. The U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) massive ethical and legal scandal enveloped the are reportedly conducting preliminary investigations into the Rupert Murdoch-owned British tabloid News of possibility of international law violations. The FBI is reportedly the World in the summer of 2011, leading to its investigating allegations that Murdoch journalists hacked into sudden closure. New allegations arose almost the phones of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks daily that reporters and private investigators or their families. British police have teamed up with Scottish Aillegally accessed the voice mail messages of politicians, authorities to continue investigating claims of phone hacking. celebrities, and private citizens. The revelations sparked Parliament launched a formal inquiry into the scandal and has worldwide public outcry and led to sweeping law enforcement questioned top News Corp. offi cials including Rupert Murdoch investigations directed at top editors of the paper, executives and his son, James Murdoch.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Law CAMLA Communications & Media Law Association Incorporated Print Post Approved PP: 234093/00011
    Communications Law CAMLA Communications & Media Law Association Incorporated Print Post Approved PP: 234093/00011 2009, A Turning Point Volume 28 No 3 December 2009 Shane Barber, the President of the Communications and Media Law Association, looks back on the year that was. Inside This Issue: There can be little doubt that 2009 will be considered a watershed year for those of us who practise law in the communications and media sectors. The life of the Communications and Media Law Association (CAMLA) this year reflects the enormous challenges and opportunities 2009, A Turning Point the industries we serve now face. CAMLA’s year started with a presentation from the Minister for Broadband, Communications The Challenge of Outsourcing in and the Digital Economy, The Hon. Senator Stephen Conroy. The Minister advised a packed audience that the government had, at that point, not yet made any decision in relation to its the Current Economic Climate broadband initiative. Less than a week later, the government shocked many in the industry with its announcement that it would go it alone in building its National Broadband Network (NBN). ACMA v 2UE and the Public Much media space has since been devoted to an analysis of the government’s NBN proposal, Interest and subsequently its proposed legislation in relation to Telstra’s network separation. By the end of the year, many were focusing on the long term consequences of the NBN for content provid- Switching Channels and ers and for communications and media regulation generally. Indeed that was where CAMLA Changing Laws: Managing the finished its year, with a panel discussion regarding the implications for intellectual property rights and communications and media regulation arising from a ubiquitous high speed broad- Radiofrequency Spectrum band network and ever changing delivery technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals in Coalition
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 72 / Autumn 2011 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals in coalition Vernon Bogdanor Riding the tiger The Liberal experience of coalition government Ian Cawood A ‘distinction without a difference’? Liberal Unionists and Conservatives Kenneth O. Morgan Liberals in coalition, 1916–1922 David Dutton Liberalism and the National Government, 1931–1940 Matt Cole ‘Be careful what you wish for’ Lessons of the Lib–Lab Pact Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 new book from tHe History Group for details, see back page Journal of Liberal History issue 72: Autumn 2011 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Riding the tiger: the Liberal experience of 4 Editor: Duncan Brack coalition government Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Vernon Bogdanor introduces this special issue of the Journal Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Coalition before 1886 10 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, York Membery Whigs, Peelites and Liberals: Angus Hawkins examines coalitions before 1886 Patrons A ‘distinction without a difference’? 14 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Ian Cawood analyses how the Liberal Unionists maintained a distinctive Professor John Vincent identity from their Conservative allies, until coalition in 1895 Editorial Board The coalition of 1915–1916 26 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Prelude to disaster: Ian Packer examines the Asquith coalition of 1915–16, Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard which brought to an end the last solely Liberal government Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Justiça Ambientes Mediaticos E Ordem Social.Pdf
    1 2 Justiça, Ambientes Mediáticos e Ordem Social 3 4 Justiça, Ambientes Mediáticos e Ordem Social Helena Machado e Filipe Santos (Organizadores) 5 6 Introdução Helena Machado e Filipe Santos Nas duas últimas décadas, o debate em torno das relações entre os tribunais e a comunicação social tem estado no epicentro da discussão pública sobre o estado da justiça (e da democracia) em vários países. Marcado pela contro- vérsia e amplifi cado por casos de investigação criminal que envolvem fi guras públicas, o pensamento sobre os destinos cruzados da justiça e dos média nem sempre terá sido neutro, salientando -se a proeminência das trocas de argumentos numa espiral difusamente centrada no interesse público. A mediatização da justiça constitui um dos mais prementes desafi os para as sociedades actuais na medida em que é dada ao público a possibilidade de observar os procedimentos, regras e o funcionamento da justiça. Por via das imagens e discursos produzidos nos média, o público recebe dados que lhe permitem elaborar concepções e representações acerca do sistema de justiça e da ordem social vigente, plasmada ou mesmo ausente nos códigos e dispo- sições legais. Apesar de episódicos excessos cometidos por alguns média em nome da transparência, do escrutínio ou do interesse público, consideramos fulcral a progressiva abertura dos tribunais à sociedade civil. Neste sentido, e dado o relativo afastamento dos cidadãos do sistema de justiça, os média podem assim constituir -se como catalisadores de reivindicações populares e de mudança, podendo inclusivamente promover o desenvolvimento da quali- dade da cidadania. Porém, a mediatização da justiça pode também servir para manter o status quo, sob a ilusão da participação e da transparência, reduzindo a vivência democrática a níveis inferiores, sem que tal se afi gure perceptível aos cidadãos, dado que frequentemente é formatada para con- sumo e entretenimento e não necessariamente como contributo para a edu- cação e formação cívica das audiências.
    [Show full text]