CJH Summer 02 Nwsltr
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Copyrighted Material
1 Introduction The work in this book has an origin that long predates my formal training. Blessed as a first-generation American, I am the daughter of parents who came from the Levant, known by some as Syria, just as or just after Greater Syria was partitioned into Lebanon and Syria and as plans for partitioning Palestine were being invented. To be raised bilingual and bicultural offered a wonderful opportunity to be privy to multiple dialogues about the meanings of Arab and American cultures. Being culturally in-between sensitized me to the sufferings of peoples I might not have heard about in American schools. I grew up knowing about the starving Armenians, the British and French colonizers, the corruption of both Arab and Western leaders, and poetic expression in both English and Arabic. I learned about the yearnings of the Pan-Arabists to model their dream after the United States of America, along with their idealization of Americans, andCOPYRIGHTED especially their idealization MATERIAL of American democracy. The indignities faced by colonized and diasporic communities, the Culture and Dignity: Dialogues between the Middle East and the West, First Edition. Laura Nader. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. NNader_c01.inddader_c01.indd 1 88/24/2012/24/2012 88:42:20:42:20 PPMM Introduction famous Arab leaders, especially the poets gunned down by colonial- ists who labeled them insurgents rather than recognizing them as nationalists, the divide and conquer tactics that pitted one religious sect against another – all of this, along with discussion of how to build a sewer system in our New England mill town, was daily conversation at our dinner table, and it instilled in me the impor- tance of mutual respect in everyday life. -
In This Week's Issue
For Immediate Release: February 27, 2017 IN THIS WEEK’S ISSUE What Lay Behind Russia’s Interference in the 2016 Election—and What Lies Ahead? In the March 6, 2017, issue of The New Yorker, in “Active Measures” (p. 40), Evan Osnos in Washington, David Remnick in New York, and Joshua Yaffa in Moscow report on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and, through interviews with key government and secu- rity voices in both countries, examine this front in the new Cold War. For many national-security officials, the Russian hacks of the Dem- ocratic National Committee and members of Hillary Clinton’s campaign were part of a larger picture: Putin’s desire to damage American confidence and to undermine the Western alliances—diplomatic, financial, and military—that have shaped the postwar world. Benjamin Rhodes, the deputy national-security adviser under President Obama, told The New Yorker, “The new phase we’re in is that the Russians have moved into an offensive posture that threatens the very international order.” The level of tension has alarmed experienced hands on both sides. Robert Gates, the Secretary of Defense under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, said, “I think the new Administra- tion has a big challenge in front of it in terms of stopping the downward spiral in the U.S.-Russia relationship while pushing back against Putin’s aggression and general thuggery.” Sergey Rogov, of the Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, in Moscow, said, “I spent many years in the trenches of the first Cold War, and I don’t want to die in the trenches of the second.” Putin, in his first few years in office, was relatively solicitous of the West. -
The Lieberman We Need to Worry About
The Lieberman We Need To Worry About Israeli Minister of Minority Affairs Avishai Braverman (Labor) thinks Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman should be fired from his ministry for saying that an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict “…is not achievable in the next year or in the next generation.” One understands Braverman’s point. Lieberman was, after all, not just offering an analysis. He himself is one of the main reasons that the pessimism he expresses exists. Lieberman is not merely a bystander offering a judgment, but an actor working against the sorts of resolutions that have, for more than 15 years, made up the foundation of a two-state solution. But Braverman’s solution wouldn’t really change much. Lieberman’s “role” as Foreign Minister has been thoroughly curtailed. Indeed, every now and then, Lieberman, who is well aware of his marginalization in the Netanyahu government, bristles and has a public spat with his boss, Benjamin Netanyahu. Bibi might toss Lieberman some kind of bone, but he has made it clear that Lieberman is not part of the inner circle. His opinion, in and of itself, carries no weight, and Bibi’s only concern (and it is a serious one) is what Lieberman can do domestically to rally people against the Likud leader. This was evidenced once again at the Washington launch of direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians last week. Surely, any country’s foreign minister should be present at such a momentous event. But Lieberman couldn’t make it as he had a very important job in bringing his diplomatic powers to bear on the sensitive and crucial relationship between Israel and … Cyprus. -
Barnes Conversations Transcript
Conversations with Bill Kristol Guest: Fred Barnes, The Weekly Standard Table of Contents I: Covering Ford, Carter, and Reagan 00:15 – 20:40 II: The Reagan Years 20:40 – 42:22 III: Politics in the Nineties 42:22 – 1:01:37 IV: Talking Politics on Television 1:01:37 – 1:24:44 I: Covering Ford, Carter, and Reagan (00:15 – 20:40) KRISTOL: Welcome back to CONVERSATIONS. I’m Bill Kristol, and I’m very pleased to be joined today by my friend and colleague, Fred Barnes. Fred, thanks for taking the time to do this. BARNES: Well, glad to be here. KRISTOL: So I came to Washington in 1985 but I had already read you for a decade before then covering the White House. How did that happen? BARNES: Well, I was covering the White House for The New Republic magazine, which everyone knows now was a very, very liberal magazine. It wasn’t that liberal then. The owner was Marty Peretz, who was sort of, he’d come sort of halfway down the neoconservative trail, and Charles Krauthammer, of course, was the big foreign policy writer there. And so it was very congenial. The New Republic had a column for a long time called “White House Watch,” and it was very good. It was written for years by a man named John Osborne, then he was replaced by Mort Kondracke, my friend, and, of course, you know, who was in 1985 was hired to be the bureau chief for Newsweek. So he left. And I had gotten to know a little bit Mike Kinsley, who was then the editor of The New Republic, and they hired me to come in and really write this “White House Watch” column, which I did, almost every week. -
Jamie S. Gorelick
Jamie S. Gorelick May 30, 2006; May 29, 2007; May 16, 2014 through July 27, 2016 Recommended Transcript of Interview with Jamie S. Gorelick (May 30, 2006; May 29, Citation 2007; May 16, 2014 through July 27, 2016), https://abawtp.law.stanford.edu/exhibits/show/jamie-s-gorelick. Attribution The American Bar Association is the copyright owner or licensee for this collection. Citations, quotations, and use of materials in this collection made under fair use must acknowledge their source as the American Bar Association. Terms of Use This oral history is part of the American Bar Association Women Trailblazers in the Law Project, a project initiated by the ABA Commission on Women in the Profession and sponsored by the ABA Senior Lawyers Division. This is a collaborative research project between the American Bar Association and the American Bar Foundation. Reprinted with permission from the American Bar Association. All rights reserved. Contact Please contact the Robert Crown Law Library at Information [email protected] with questions about the ABA Women Trailblazers Project. Questions regarding copyright use and permissions should be directed to the American Bar Association Office of General Counsel, 321 N Clark St., Chicago, IL 60654-7598; 312-988-5214. ABA Senior Lawyers Division Women Trailblazers in the Law ORAL HISTORY of JAMIE GORELICK Interviewer: Pamela A. Bresnahan Dates of Interviews: May 30, 2006 May 29, 2007 The following is the transcript of an interview with Jamie Gorelick conducted on May 30, 2006 and May 29, 2007, for the Women Trailblazers in the Law, a project of the American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession. -
Steal This Essay: Content Is a Pure Public Good by Dan Kohn [email protected]
Steal This Essay: Content Is a Pure Public Good by Dan Kohn [email protected] 1) Steal this essay, or, why these sorts of essays represent the future of all publishing. Hint: I'm not getting paid for them. "Freedom of the press belongs to those who own one." - A.J. Liebling If you or anyone you know has ever or will ever produce content (writing, music, video, etc.) and hopes to get paid for it, you should be afraid. To see why, start by downloading (for free, of course) one of the numerous peer- to-peer file sharing systems such as Aimster, LimeWire, and eDonkey2000 that have emerged hydra-like to take the place of Napster, whose head was cut off this spring by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). You will find that much the same selection of MP3 music that was on Napster is still available for free, as well as being accompanied by more and more movies ("ripped" directly from DVDs), and nearly all other forms of content, from Shakespeare's works to hard core adult materials. http://www.aimster.com/ http://www.limewire.com/ http://www.edonkey2000.com/ http://www.napster.com/ http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbser=1206 What you will not find - even if you are the RIAA - is anyone to sue. Because unlike Napster, there are no companies underlying the software infrastructure, no servers to confiscate, no officers on whom to serve papers. The next generation of peer-to-peer clients relies on no central infrastructure whatsoever, and is being developed by a loose knit group of developers spread around the world, all donating their significant efforts without any real hope of getting paid for their work. -
Opposition Exhibit Binder I
Application of Congregation Shearith Israel For Variance From the Application of Provisions of The New York City Zoning Resolution BSA Cal No: 74-07 BZ CEQR No: 07BSA071M Premises 6-10 West 70th Street Manhattan Opposition Exhibit Binder I January 28, 2008 Exhibits Opp. Ex. A - FF Alan D. Sugarman, Esq. 17 W. 70th Street New York, New York 10023 2 NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF STANDARDS AND APPEALS _____________________________________________________ BSA Cal No: 74-07 BZ Application of CEQR No: Congregation Shearith Israel 07BSA071M For Premises Variance 6-10 West 70th Street From the Application of Provisions of Manhattan The New York City Zoning Resolution Affirmation of Alan D. Sugarman Submission of Opposition Exhibit _____________________________________________________ Binder I Alan D. Sugarman, does hereby affirm: 1. I am an attorney duly licensed in the State of New York and in good standing. I reside across the street from the Congregation Shearith Israel and am familiar with the facts and circumstances relating to this variance application. I make this affirmation in opposition to the granting of the variances requested. 2. The purposes of this affirmation are to introduce into the record of this proceeding the Opposition Exhibits contained in the accompanying Opposition Exhibit Binder I, to summarize documents already submitted into the record, and to provide a convenient reference. Many of the exhibits are abstracted from other documents previously filed Affirmation Opponents Exhibit Binder I January 28, 2008 Page 2 of 16 with the Board and are provided as group exhibits. Opposition Exhibit Binder I consists of Opp. Ex. A through Opp. Ex. -
Landmark Conference on the New Anti-Semitism
No. 9 Summer 2003 From the Executive Director’s Desk The Center is flourishing as a major New York hub for the exploration and interpretation of Jewish history. There have been critically acclaimed exhibits, headliner programs and world-class speakers—all furthering our mission to pre- serve the Jewish past and bring its treasures to people DAVID KARP throughout the world. Professors Henry Louis Gates, Jr. (left) and Alain Finkielkraut were among the YIVO conference noted participants. We take pride in the part- ners’ well-earned reputations for creating new models and Landmark Conference standards of historical research, programming and On The New Anti-Semitism outreach. This reputation has been acknowledged many The news has been alarming. Reports indicate that two-thirds of the 313 racially motivated times over in recent months. attacks reported in France last year were directed at Jews, while Britain had a 75 percent rise in Sixty journalists from the anti-Semitic incidents. What part of this narrative is new – a manifestation of an abruptly U.S., England, France, changed world? Is the backlash against globalization setting fires of intolerance and resentment Germany and Israel visited the and radical nationalism everywhere? What does the revival of anti-Semitism owe to the revival of Center to cover the four-day anti-Americanism? What does it owe to the new anti-Zionism? YIVO conference that consid- To grapple with these complex questions, the YIVO Institute for Jewish Research asked three ered the alarming recent eminent intellectuals – Leon Botstein, Martin Peretz and Leon Wieseltier – to bring together 35 upsurge in anti-Semitism in of their colleagues from Europe, the United States and Israel, to join them for an exchange of the West. -
Gordon Fellman Papers03.Mwalb00024a
Gordon Fellman papers03.MWalB00024A This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 29, 2021. eng Describing Archives: A Content Standard Brandeis University 415 South St. Waltham, MA URL: https://findingaids.brandeis.edu/ Gordon Fellman papers03.MWalB00024A Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 4 Biographical or Historical Information ......................................................................................................... 5 Scope and Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 5 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 7 General ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Ford Hall Occupation -
Rothbard-Rockwell Report
ROTHBARD-ROCKWELL REPORT In Search of A1 article had noted that Jews would vote enthusiastically for Gore’s Clinton (as indeed they did), Heckscher because, since he had picked A1 Gore as Veep candidate, Clin- by Murray N. Rothbard ton had received “the heck- While Bill Buckley has been scher” (Yiddish for imprimatur) engaged in his seemingly end- from A1 Gore. Well, that’s clear THE EAR less search for anti-Semitism, I enough. But that brings us back by Sarah Barton have been engaged in a simi- to Square One. How did Gore larly fruitless quest: I have been get the Heckscher? and then There is a lot of sneering go- trying to find out precisely why we are no better off than before. ing on in the U.S.about the Albert Gore seems to be iden- What is it about A1 Gore that various ethnic groups in the tical with Jewry. Let me put it gave him the lifelong power to Balkans, and how they are this way: in their sprightly’and confer heckschers, to convey ”obsessed by history” and famous article in the New York the Jewish vote? In addition to refuse to get on with the pre- Sunday Times Magmine (Jan. 17), attending Baptist services, is sent and future. But here we Michael Kelly and Maureen there some basement room have the alleged “libertarian” Dowd, in writing of the recent where A1 Gore secretly kisses and devotee of ”reason” Vir- strains in the Clinton-Gore rela- the menorah? ginia Postrel, the whiny editor tionship, talk about what a great In my quest, I asked a friend of Reason magazine, After de- advantage Gore had been to of mine, steeped in political nouncing Pat Buchanan in Clinton during the campaign. -
Get Nader ! the PAY-OFF Political Culture Was Under Paign to Reelect Ron Carey As President Siege
CounterPunchTells the Facts and Names the Names $2.50 October 16-31 2000 Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair VOL. 7, NO.18 You Could Smell the Fear In This Issue Get Nader ! THE PAY-OFF political culture was under paign to reelect Ron Carey as president siege. Hear the panic as the of the Teamsters) A waters poured into Atlantis. Clinton threw the crime bill and the • The Nader/Green Jesse Jackson cried out that “Our welfare bill at the liberals and they took Surge Has Given very lives are at stake”. Paul Wellstone it with barely a bleat. In 1996 he never quavered that George W. Bush will “re- faced a challenge, as had Jimmy Carter Many Young Folk peal the twentieth century”. Martin from old-line liberalism embodied in the Peretz wrote furiously in The New Re- form of Ted Kennedy. In 2000 the only a Taste for the public that “Naderism represents the halfway-serious threat to Gore came Excitement of Radical emotional satisfaction of the American from another neo-liberal, Bill Bradley. left at the expense of the social and eco- By the early summer we were set for Organizing. People nomic satisfaction of women, blacks, another status quo election, a reaffirma- Carry Such Hours gays, and poor people in America.” tion of the one-party state. Back in 1992 Jackie Blumenthal, Somewhere in the third week of Oc- and Days With Them wife of Sidney Blumenthal, was asked tober the Gore crowd woke up to the for the Rest why she and her husband were such clear and awful thought that they might rabid supporters of a con man from Ar- not make it, that maybe it wasn’t their of Their Lives kansas called Bill Clinton. -
Interview with Outgoing President Richard Joel the Joel Years From
MAY 15, 2017 The Independent Student Newspaper of Yeshiva College, Sy Syms School of Business, and Yeshiva University Volume LXXXI Issue 10 INSIDE: SPECIAL PRESIDENTIAL SECTION Interview with The Joel Years from the Perspective of Outgoing President One YC Faculty Member Richard Joel By Dr. Will Lee By Doron Levine Ever since Richard Joel delivered his investiture address on September 21, 2003, I have regarded him as the heir of YC’s founding president Bernard Revel. Both men eloquently expressed and furthered the mission For this year’s final issue of The Commentator, we sat of Yeshiva College, now Yeshiva University: the mutually reinforcing harmony of Torah Studies, Jewish down with outgoing YU President Richard Joel and asked Studies, and the liberal arts. Both men recognized and nurtured the historic uniqueness of the institution him to reflect on his fourteen as president. President Joel will they loved. Both men realized step down on June 5, and will that for the education they be succeeded by Rabbi Dr. Ari supported to succeed, they had Berman. to encourage the strengthening and multiplication of modern Doron Levine: What Orthodox Jewish communities are some of the most by training rabbis and leading a important changes you’ve religious movement. Both men made to YU during your reached out beyond Centrist presidency? Orthodoxy to other religious President Joel: First of all, Jews, all Jews, America, Israel, nothing was me. It was we. I and beyond. think maybe one of the most I have been asked to represent important changes was that it the faculty of YC through this became a place of “we.” In other article on the Joel era.