DOCSLIB.ORG

Aleksandre Gabisonia Formation of the Georgian National Discourse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aleksandre Gabisonia Formation of the Georgian National Discourse Aleksandre Gabisonia Formation of the Georgian National Discourse Introduction This article will discuss the formation of nationalism in Georgia. Even though national aspirations were somewhat present in medieval Georgia, at least among the ruling elite, the paper will not examine the medieval period. The year 1918 when Georgia achieved political independence and preceding events served as the turning point. The paper will consider the main social institutions, political trends, elite strategies and social reactions in the nation- alism discourse of the period. Georgian independence declared on May 26, 1918 was short lived — it was lost in 1921 when the Bolshevik army invaded Georgia. The three years of independence and earlier events are very important to look at. The libera- tion movement of this period was the first expression of Georgian national- ism. Leader of the movement, Ilia Chavchavadze (1837-1907) — who also was the publisher and owner of the first Georgian newspaper and the national bank — is considered the father of Georgian nation and was canonized by the Georgian Church. His famous trinity “Language, Fatherland, Faith” served as the basis of independent Georgian state and remains the cornerstone of Georgian identity. The main social institutions of the period were printed media, educational system, banking sector, folklore and museum. With these social tools the elite wanted to introduced national awakening among Geor- gian population and subsequently achieve cultural and political autonomy from the Russian Empire. Despite obvious emphasis on faith and language, nationalism dis- course of this period can be regarded as civic rather than ethnic. This can be argued based on the policy towards Muslim minorities, strong efforts to reach social equality through anti-feudal policy, permanent financial sup- port for local peasants from the national bank and Western orientation of the leaders of liberation movement — it is well-known that Chavchavadze and his companions were heavily influenced by liberation movements in It- aly and Ireland. 66 Formation of the Georgian National Discourse Georgia in the Late 19th Century and the First Independence Before describing historical events in Georgia and analyzing them the- oretically, it will be useful to sketch some general ideas about this period. Na- tional consciousness, and consequently the first Georgian Republic, first ap- peared at the turn of the 20th century. In modern Western terms this implies a democratic republic, free from a feudal system and religious legitimation of rulers. Many constructivists argue that the concept of a modern state was created after the French Revolution of 1789 (Gellner 1983, Anderson 1991, Hobsbawm 1991)1. Appearance of national consciousness is an artificial phe- nomenon and is based on several social trends — development of household, publishing houses (printed media), creation of universal and mandatory edu- cational system based on national language. Dissolution of the feudal system and establishment of social equality are indispensable to national conscious- ness. A national language is artificially created and institutionalized by a small group of individuals. The newborn national consciousness requires a “new- old history”, which is recreated. Any liberation movement is not a common mass movement initially and does not have wide support. It is in the hands of small intellectual elite who will come to power if successful. This elite group makes political decisions, which affect the social life of common people. Na- tional consciousness is spread through masses and liberation movements gain more power. The Beginnings — Western Influence To trace the path to Georgia’s first independence it is vital to describe and analyze the liberation movement of the early 20th century and the dispo- sition of intellectual elites of the time, especially activities of Ilia Chavcha- vadze. This person played the most significant role in the struggle for inde- pendence and therefore, it is important to focus on his socio-political life. Ac- cording to constructivists, modern nation-states and nationalism as an ideol- ogy and social movement have its origins in Western Europe, namely France and England. Anderson ascribes this phenomenon to the decline of religious society, development of print capitalism and the Enlightenment2. According to Gellner the main trigger for this transformation was in- dustrialization and modernization3. The western model of self-determination and the strategy of liberation movement were spread from these regions to other parts of the world. Even anti-colonial liberation movements in Africa 67 Aleksandre Gabisonia and East Asia followed this pattern, as it provided efficient means to incite the masses. Therefore, it is not surprising that Western education was a cru- cial move for resistance groups in Georgia. It is not an overestimation to say that Chavchavadze and his compan- ions were heavily influenced by their studies at St. Petersburg University. At the time, the University was the best place to gain Western education with- out knowing European languages. Besides acquiring theoretical knowledge of world history, state law, social law, economy, political economy, French and German languages, Chavchavadze and his team members had their first experience in the struggle for national values, namely for the Georgian lan- guage. Georgian students demanded to establish Georgian as the language for the country’s internal affairs. In March 1881 Chavchavadze wrote that “it is necessary to introduce judicial changes in regard to the national language. Na- tionality, as well as religious belonging, is a personal matter. It is easier to teach the language of people to several officials than to force the whole nation to learn a foreign one” 4. According to Hobsbawm, definition of national language and its establishment for official usage are necessary conditions for becoming a nation-state5. The second half of the 19th century was the period of national unrest in many regions of Europe. Students in St. Petersburg closely observed these developments: the Irish people’s struggle for independence from Britain, na- tional riots against the Habsburg Empire in Hungary, the Italian revolu- tionary movement led by Giuseppe Garibaldi. These socio-political events inspired the future leaders of Georgian liberation movement. A poem by Chavchavadze written in 1860 is dedicated to the Italian liberation move- ment and hopes for similar course of events in Georgia: “I hear the long wished voice of people Crushing the chains of obedience, Voice of truth is heard over the world To defeat the slavery. This voice encourages me And evokes hope… Dear Lord, I am begging you Make this voice sound in my fatherland too!!!”6 He also dedicated many poems and publications to other liberation movements and political processes in Western Europe. Moreover, he wanted to join Garibaldi’s army as a volunteer. From these chronicles it is evident that in its formative period Georgian elite was heavily influenced by Western liberators. After their return from Russia, Chavchavadze and his team started acting immediately. To explain the motivation of national movements in mul- 68 Formation of the Georgian National Discourse tiethnic empires, it is helpful to refer to Gellner’s hypothetical Megalomanian Empire and its periphery region Ruritania7. Ruritanian population, primarily made up from the proletariat and illiterate lower classes, is oppressed and pas- sive under the Megalomanian government. Ruritanian peasants speak mutu- ally more or less comprehensible kindred dialects, their habits and lifestyle are also similar, making up a close to harmonious society inside the empire. Ruritanian language does not exist; there are only dialects, which could po- tentially become a single language. The dialects are spoken only by the lower strata since aristocracy and nobility speak the official language of Megalo- mania, which is completely different from local dialects and used for official purposes in Ruritania. At the onset of industrialization the small elite of Ru- ritanian intellectuals educated in Megalomania have better qualifications and skills than their countrymen. However, they cannot compete with the center and have better prospects in independent Ruritania. The establishment of in- dependent Ruritanian Republic requires many efforts. The first priority is to equip the masses with national consciousness. The national movement is led by the intellectual elite. It is also evident, however, that mass support of the proletariat is essential — Gellner is referring to peasants living in cities and slums, away from their place of birth8. Development of nationalism in Geor- gia closely resembles Gellner’s model — a group of young people travelled to the centre of the Russian Empire, were introduced to the Western world and were inspired by the ideas of liberation. After returning to peripheral Georgia they formed intellectual elite, which was later transformed into governmental elite and initiated a Georgian liberation movement. Chavchavadze returned to Georgia after the completion of his studies in 1861. During his journey back, he wrote one of his greatest masterpiec- es, The Travelers’ Diaries, where he outlines the importance of nation-build- ing. After the return from St. Petersburg, which clearly was the educational centre of the Russian Empire, Chavchavadze and his companions started to create an effective strategy for establishing national consciousness among
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Georgian Orthodox Church: National Identity and Political Influence
    October 2015 Traditional religion and political power: Examining the role of the church in Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine and Moldova Edited by Adam Hug The publication examines the political and social role of the Orthodox Churches in Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova and of the Armenian Apostolic Church. It explores the ways in which the churches have contributed to the development of national identities since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the role they play in civil society. The publication looks at the nature of the relationship between church and state; how the churches influence, support and challenge the secular authorities in their hold on power and their response to 'traditional values' issues such as LGBTI and minority faith rights. The publication also looks at the ways in which the Russian Orthodox Church and Russian Government have been looking to influence this debate in these countries. The publication contains contributions from: Professor Yulia Antonyan, Yerevan State University; Eka Chitanava, Tolerance and Diversity Institute; Stepan Danielyan, Collaboration for Democracy Centre; Adam Hug (ed.), Foreign Policy Centre; Myroslav Marynovych, Ukrainian Catholic University in Lviv; Victor Munteanu, Soros Foundation Moldova; Rev. Fr. Dr Daniel Payne; Professor Oleksandr Sagan, Skovoroda Institute of Philosophy and Irakli Vacharadze, Executive Director, Identoba. Kindly supported by the Open Society Foundations. The publication is available at: http://fpc.org.uk/publications/orthodox Excerpt from the publication, p.40 The Georgian Orthodox Church: National Identity and Political Influence Eka Chitanava1 The Georgian Orthodox Church in the Imperial and Soviet Past In 1811, Russian Emperor Alexander I abolished the autocephaly of the Georgian Orthodox Church and placed it under the command of the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Maia Tsertsvadze Participants of the Conspiracy of 1832 As
    Maia Tsertsvadze Participants of the Conspiracy of 1832 as presented in the epistolary heritage by N. Baratashvili Abstract: A small-sized epistolary work (18 personal letters) by Nikoloz Baratashvili, a Georgian romantic poet (1817-1845) presents significant material, not only for the exploration of the author’s way of life and creative works but also for the characterisation of the socio-political life of Georgia in the first part of the 19th century. Due to his noble origin (on his mother’s side Nikoloz Baratashvili was a direct descendent of the Kartli-Kakheti branch of the Bagrationi Royal family), Nikoloz Baratashvili lived among the country’s political and cultural elite. As well as this, he had an active contact with the participants of an orginised conspiracy of the nobles of 1832 against the Russian Empire. Moreover, the participants of this event make up a major part of the people mentioned in his personal letters which gives the letters certain significance from the point of view of historiography of the conspiracy. The present research aims at collecting the biographical data regarding the participants of the conspiracy and exploring their interrelationship to the poet. Key words: Nikoloz Baratashvili, epistolary works by Nikoloz Baratashvili, the conspiracy of the year 1832, Russian Imperial Policy in the Caucasus Participants of the Conspiracy of 1832 as presented in the epistolary heritage by N. Baratashvili An important acquisition of Georgian literature - Nikoloz Baratashvili’s epistolary heritage deserves our attention from a number of points./angles. Despite its small size (only 18 of his personal letters have reached us) it presents valuable material regarding, primarily, the life and creative works of the author, his political beliefs, worldview, world perception and a spiritual biography of the poet.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism and Georgia
    Ilia Chavchavadze Center for European Studies and Civic Education Liberalism and Georgia Tbilisi 2020 Liberalism and Georgia © NCLE Ilia Chavchavadze Center for European Studies and Civic Edu- cation, 2020 www.chavchavadzecenter.ge © Authors: Teimuraz Khutsishvili, Nino Kalandadze, Gaioz (Gia) Japaridze, Giorgi Jokhadze, Giorgi Kharebava, 2020 Editor-in-chief: Zaza Bibilashvili Editor: Medea Imerlishvili The publication has been prepared with support from the Konrad-Ad- enauer-Stiftung South Caucasus within the framework of the project “Common Sense: Civil Society vis-à-vis Politics.” The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily rep- resent those of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung South Caucasus. This content may not be reproduced, copied or distributed for commercial purposes without expressed written consent of the Center. The Ilia Chavchavadze Center extends its thanks to Dr. David Mai- suradze, a Professor at Caucasus University, and students Nika Tsilosani and Ana Lolua for the support they provided to the publication. Layout designer: Irine Stroganova Cover page designer: Tamar Garsevanishvili ISBN 978-9941-31-292-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CENTER’S FORWORD .................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................7 CHAPTER I – WHAT IS LIBERALISM? ..............................................9 Historical understanding of liberalism ..........................................9 Formation of
    [Show full text]
  • Conferenceproceedingseng Final
    CLIMATE CHANGE AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: POLICY AND ACTION National Conference April, 2016 Institutionalization of Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Georgian Regions (ICCAMGR) This Publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of NALAG and authors of the texts and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................... 6 Brief History ........................................................................................................ 6 CLIMATE CHANGE AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: POLICY AND ACTION ....... 7 CONFERENCE REPORTS .......................................................... 8 Climate Change and Agriculture ............................................................................. 9 Regional Information Consultation Centers (RICC) in Georgia .................................. 10 Impacts of Climate Change on Industry ................................................................ 10 Energy Sector Vulnerability to Climate Change ...................................................... 11 Climate Change and the Social Sector .................................................................. 11 INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE ................................................ 12 Mountains and Climate Change: Experience from Alps - Austria ............................. 12 Climate Plans in Western Europe:
    [Show full text]
  • Ghia Nodia Components of the Georgian National Idea
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ILIAUNI Open Journal Systems (Ilia State University, Tbilisi) Ghia Nodia Components of the Georgian National Idea: an Outline Since the 1980s, theoretical literature on nationalism has abounded, its most influential stars including Ernest Gellner, Benedict Anderson, An- thony Smith and Rogers Brubaker. The main thrust has been to problema- tize the concept of nation as most people have tended to perceive it since the 19th century. To reject, that is, the romanticized idea of a nation as an age- old, pre-given entity one is supposed to speak of with awe. The new scholars of nations and nationalism disdain these approaches as “primoridialist” and “essentialist” - which, for them, is synonymous with unprofessionalism and inadequacy. On the other hand, most of Georgian intellectual tradition, in- asmuch as it is preoccupied with the concept of the Georgian nation, takes the essentialist-primordialist approach for granted - even when authors dis- play sharply critical attitudes towards different aspects of Georgian social or political realities. Georgian sociologists who teach contemporary theories of nationalism rarely apply them to Georgian material.1 The latter attempts are rare and mostly belong to foreign scholars.2 The aim of this article is to propose a tentative trajectory of the evolu- tion of the idea of the modern Georgian nation. I will not go into theoretical debates on nationalism but start by briefly summarizing my general approach towards the problem. Then I will proceed with a general description of two major components of the Georgian national idea: identity-building on the one hand, and the Georgian nation as a political project.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociological Analysis of Internally Displaced Persons (Idps) As a Social Identity: a Case Study for Georgian Idps
    A SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS (IDPS) AS A SOCIAL IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY FOR GEORGIAN IDPS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY HAZAR EGE GÜRSOY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF AREA STUDIES AUGUST 2021 Approval of the thesis: A SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS (IDPS) AS A SOCIAL IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY FOR GEORGIAN IDPS submitted by HAZAR EGE GÜRSOY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Area Studies, the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Dean Graduate School of Social Sciences Assist. Prof. Dr. Derya Göçer Head of Department Department of Area Studies Prof. Dr. Ayşegül AYDINGÜN Supervisor Department of Sociology Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Pınar KÖKSAL (Head of the Examining Committee) Middle East Technical University Department of Political Science and Public Administration Prof. Dr. Ayşegül AYDINGÜN (Supervisor) Middle East Technical University Department of Sociology Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık KUŞÇU BONNENFANT Middle East Technical University Department of International Relations Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya BİLETSKA Karabük University Department of International Relations Assist. Prof. Dr. Olgu KARAN Başkent University Department of Sociology iii iv PLAGIARISM I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and the Issue of Nation-Building in the Nineteenth Century’S Georgian Political Thought
    Przegląd Narodowościowy / Review of Nationalities • nr 8/2018 • Nations without state or states without nations ISSN 2084-848X (print) • ISSN 2543-9391 (on-line) • DOI 10.2478/pn-2018-0008 Salome Dundua * Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1059-3113 Nationalism and the issue of nation-building in the nineteenth century’s Georgian political thought Among the great number of nationalism theories, one of the widespread and shared is the modernist one. Despite a lot of variations even within this trend, one thing is com- mon: nation is the concept of modern epoch and its birth is connected to the modern- ist age. Europe of the second half of nineteenth century was covered by the wave of na- tionalism which has resulted in, on the one hand, collapse of empires and liberation of nations, and on the another hand, unification of already existing nations and creation of new “nation-states”. It was a quite complex and long-term issue. Territorial and po- litical union is not enough for being perceived as one nation. For example, for creation of “Frenchman” and “Italians” a number of reforms were implemented: state enhanced education, compulsory elementary schooling, forbidding languages other than Italian or French and religion teaching, compulsory military service and so on.As Massimo Azeglio, one of the founders of unified Italy, once noted “Italy has been made, now it remains to make Italians” 1. According to Eric Hobsbawm, along with school education system during the pro- cess of communication governments o"en use the idea of sharing common history.
    [Show full text]
  • For Beauty, Nation and God the Creation of the Georgian National Treasure
    Venezia Arti e-ISSN 2385-2720 Vol. 27 – Dicembre 2018 ISSN 0394-4298 For Beauty, Nation and God The Creation of the Georgian National Treasure Alžběta Filipová (Ivane Djavakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Georgia) Abstract The following paper traces the origins and increased interest in the cultural heritage of Georgia on behalf of the local intelligentsia in the 19th century. After describing the circumstances that may have led the new generation of Georgian scholars to a systematic exploration of ancient remains in the Caucasus and medieval ecclesiastical monuments and treasuries, the paper will focus on the main archaeologists of Christian antiquity in Georgia, Dimitri Bakradze and Ekvtime Taqaishvili. Finally, the study outlines the creation of what has been called the Georgian National Treasure. The treasure items, collected from monasteries and settlements all over Georgia and protected from robberies and impetuous art collectors, were sent into exile in 1921, shortly before the short-lived Georgian Democratic Republic’s annexation to the Soviet Union. The thirty-nine boxes, containing manuscripts, icons, precious liturgical vessels and other priceless items, were sent from Batumi to Marseille, via Istanbul, and stored in France until 1945, when Ekvtime Taqaishvili, who had taken care of and protected them over those 24 years, accompanied them back to Tbilisi. Summary 1 Introduction. – 2 Discovering the Southern Caucasus. – 3 Russian Collectors of Georgian Medieval Artefacts . – 4 Georgian Archaeology: Dimitri Bakradze and Ekvtime
    [Show full text]
  • Konstantine Bregadze, Phd European and National Context of Georgian
    Konstantine Bregadze, Phd European and National Context of Georgian Modernist Literature Abstract: The socio-cultural preconditions of Georgian Modernism single out two chief aspects: 1. Modernism, as a viewpoint and literary discourse, Georgian Modernists, on the one hand connected with the issue of renewal of Georgian Culture, which implied the approachment of Georgian and Western Culture and make Georgian Culture an inseparable part of the western one, an on the other hand, saw it as a means of re- establishing Georgian state an orientation towards the West both politically and culturally; 2. The intensive reception and establishment of Modernist viewpoints and Aesthetics is connected with the intensified political life of the 20s – the catastrophe of 1921, the political terror and repressions of the 20s, the suppression of the rebellion of 1924, the anti-religious terror and propaganda of the Bolsheviks. Also, it is connected with the intensified technical-mechanic ideologist progress of the 20s which was executed by the Bolsheviks under the Messianic Pathos. Key Words: European Modernism, Georgian Modernism, Modernist Literature ‘We should overcome the ethnographic borders of Georgian Culture’ Konstantine Gamsakhurdia In Georgia, as well as in Europe, the establishment of literary modernism, and in general, orientation on the modern outlook and modernist aesthetic, was not an unnatural and unconscious phenomenon, a kind of fashion to follow. The modernist authors were interested in the modernist aesthetic, the modernist themes, in the problems and poetical and ideological principles and it was not driven by a temporary or youth interest ("youth disease", "naive passion"), neither was it a subject of coquette ("a foreign terminal disease"), but the modernist authors linked the modernist aesthetics to Georgian culture; they aimed towards ‘straightening the radius’ (T.
    [Show full text]
  • English Languages, Tb., 2017
    THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED BY THE GEORGIAN FOUNDATION FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES. The Expansion of Russia in the Caucasus and Georgia project offers the reader collection s Editor-in-chief: Giorgi Cheishvili of scientific-popular articles which Editor-corrector: Tinatin Evdoshvili aims to cover the Project author: Irakli Gegechkori Georgian-Russian relations of the Designer: Tornike Bokuchava XVIII-XX centuries in a manner different from the widely propagated perspective of the official Russia. © Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies All rights reserved Ecclesiastical Relations XIX century RUSSIA’S EXPANSION IN THE CAUCASUS AND GEORGIA Between Georgia and the beginning and Russia of XX century Eldar Bubulashvili Ecclesiastical Relations Between Georgia and Russia during the XIX-XX Centuries GEORGIAN CHURCH DURING EXARCHS Russia-Georgian ecclesiastical relations have evolved in the course of political relations between the two countries. They were fragmented for several centuries and became more intense in the XVII-XVIII centuries. Since the second half of the XVIII century when Russia’s southern border reached the Caucasus ridge, Russia’s political and ecclesiastical interests in Georgia have grown. This interest is well reflected in the agreements concluded between Russia and Georgia during this period. lthough the treaty between Kartl-Kakheti and Russia in 1783 did not address the issue of the autocephaly of the Georgian Church, Article 8 of the treaty severely restricted its rights. The A Archbishop of the centuries-old Autocephalous Church of Georgia was to occupy the eighth place in the Russian Holy Synod after the Peter I, Bishop of the Tobolsk Eparchy. When signing the treaty, the King of Russia Georgian ambassadors (Garsevan Chavchavadze and Ioane (1682-1721) Mukhranbatoni) protested this article since the Georgian and Emperor (1721-1725) Archbishop was to be ranked fifth among the first-tier Russian bishops according to the previously agreed draft version of the agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalin) and Murder of Ilia Chavchavadze
    Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol 2: Issue III ISSN: 2706 – 8242 www.eresearchjournal.com Jul - Sep 2020 Joseph Jughashvili (Stalin) and Murder of Ilia Chavchavadze by Professor Tengiz Simashvili Iakob Gogebashvili Telavi State University, Georgia Email: [email protected] Abstract The archives of Georgia contain many interesting documents about Joseph Stalin. One of the most significant documents among them is a letter on September 5, 1907. It is mention, that somebody with last name Nizharadze was the suspect in Ilia Chavchavadze’s assassination. It is quite possible that this surname contains extremely important information to the study of Joseph Jughashvili (Stalin)’s biography. The point is that in 1908, Joseph Jughashvili (Stalin) was arrested in Baku with a false passport under the name of Gaioz Nizharadze. According to the archival materials which I have discovered so far, it becomes evident that the false passport under the name of Nizharadze was issued on April 7, 1906. On the one hand, such a coincidence of surnames directly indicates Joseph Jughashvili (Stalin)’s involvement in Ilia Chavchavadze’s assassination. However, on the other hand, while working on the archival documents in Georgia regarding Ilia Chavchavadze’s assassins: Iliko Imerlishvili, Ivane Inashvili, Pavle Fshavlishvili, and Gigila Berbichashvili, I could not find any information about Joseph Jughashvili’s or “Nizharadze’s” involvement in Chavchavadze’s murder. Although the information and documents, examined in this article, are to some extent contradictory, the analysis of them makes it evident that Joseph Jughashvili’s Biography is not sufficiently studied. Keywords: The Georgian achieves, Murder of Ilia Chavchavadze, Joseph Stalin, Biography, Terrorists, Historiography Introduction: There are quite interesting materials about Joseph Jughashvili (Stalin) in archival materials of the murder of Ilia Chavchavadze.
    [Show full text]