Arxiv:1904.12388V2 [Gr-Qc] 5 Oct 2019 [email protected] Orsodn Uhr .Gregori G
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Draft version October 8, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Modiﬁed Friedmann equations via conformal Bohm – De Broglie gravity G. Gregori,1 B. Reville,2 and B. Larder1 1Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK 2Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Kernphysik, Postfach 10 39 80, 69029 Heidelberg, Germany ABSTRACT We use an alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics, based on the Bohmian trajectory ap- proach, and show that the quantum eﬀects can be included in the classical equation of motion via a conformal transformation on the background metric. We apply this method to the Robertson-Walker metric to derive a modiﬁed version of Friedmann’s equations for a Universe consisting of scalar, spin- zero, massive particles. These modiﬁed equations include additional terms that result from the non- local nature of matter and appear as an acceleration in the expansion of the Universe. We see that the same eﬀect may also be present in the case of an inhomogeneous expansion. Keywords: cosmology: theory — cosmology: dark matter — cosmology: dark energy 1. INTRODUCTION de Broglie-Bohm trajectories can have a sound phys- The equations governing quantum mechanics have been ical interpretation if full non-locality is accounted for known for nearly 100 years, but yet the task of reconcil- (Mahler et al. 2016). Extensions to quantum ﬂuids ing them with the equations of classical motions remains (Haas 2011; Cross et al. 2014), ﬁeld theory (D¨urr et al. unsolved (see e.g., Ref. Hiley and Muft (1995)). The 2004; Carroll 2007) and curved space-time (D¨urr et al. problem is usually expressed in terms of the trajectory 2014; Holland 1992; Shojai and Shojai 2006) have also (or path) that a particle follows. While in ordinary New- been presented. tonian theory a particle moves along a well deﬁned path Here we adopt one of the latter approaches (see Carroll (a concept that can be extended to curved space too), (2005) for a review) and develop a formalism which per- this is not true anymore in orthodox (or the Copenhagen mits a reinterpretation of the classical path by including interpretation) quantum mechanics. This is because it is the eﬀects of Bohm’s nonlocal potential on the particle’s impossible to simultaneously measure the position and motion. This is achieved in the usual manner, through momentum of the particle. There is, however, an alter- suitable modiﬁcation of the action for a free particle of native possibility, called Bohmian mechanics or the de mass m, Broglie-Bohm interpretation (Bohm 1952; Bohm et al. = m g uµuνds (1) S − µν 1987), whereby the particle follows a deﬁnite path, dif- Z arXiv:1904.12388v2 [gr-qc] 5 Oct 2019 µ µ p ferent from the classical one, determined not only by the where u = dx /ds is the dimensionless 4-momentum action of local potential, as in ordinary classical mechan- and gµν the space-time metric (we use units, unless spec- ics, but also by the non-local feedback of the particle’s iﬁed otherwise, where c = ~ = 1). The metric is taken wave function on its own motion (Bohm 1952). to have signature (+, , , ). − − − It has been shown, in the non-relativistic case, that The eﬀects of an external ﬁeld can be incorporated Bohmian quantum mechanics yields the same results as into the above action via a modiﬁed metric: gµν g˜µν . → orthodox quantum mechanics (Bohm 1952), indeed both As discussed in Goldstein (1950), there is no single way approaches can be developed from the usual Schr¨odinger to modify the metric in equation (1), and in fact, any µ equation, albeit with a diﬀerent physical interpreta- function of a world scalar (in this case uµu ) that leads tion. Experiments have also demonstrated that the to the correct equations of motion is acceptable. The same is also true for actions that account for the parti- cle’s interaction with external forces by including an ad- Corresponding author: G. Gregori ditive term, provided again due care is taken to ensure [email protected] Lorentz invariance. Zee (2013), for example, exploits a number of diﬀerent approaches to introduce the eﬀects 2 of electromagnetic and gravitational ﬁelds into the ac- tion. As an example, it is well known that a simple Exploiting our prior knowledge of the Bohm potential, modiﬁcation of the Minkowski metric tensor: i.e., letting V = Vext +VB, and carrying out the standard substitution = ∂tS it is immediately observed that η η˜ = diag(1 + 2V/m, 1, 1, 1), (2) H − µν → µν − − − (9) reproduces (4) as expected. Thus, if we acknowledge for a scalar potential V , provides a way to reproduce the presence of the Bohm potential in a given system, Newton’s law in the non-relativistic limit. We will em- it is possible to include its eﬀect in macroscopic systems ploy a similar approach below in order to introduce via an appropriate transformation of the metric. Recent quantum eﬀects into more complex metrics. work that exploits this approach (Carroll 2005), tacitly assumes the equations already describes an ensemble or 2. QUANTUM EFFECTS AS A CONFORMAL cloud of particles. We attempt to make this concept TRANSFORMATION OF THE METRIC more precise in the next section. Writing Schr¨odinger’s equation, for a particle of mass m, in polar form: ψ = ψ exp (iS) with real function | | S(x,t), Bohm (1952) establishes the set of coupled equa- tions 3. THE MANY-BODY VERSION OF THE BOHM ∂ ψ 2 + ∇ ~v ψ 2 = 0 (3) POTENTIAL t| | · | | and While, so far, we have considered the motion of a single test particle, it is clear that we cannot neglect the eﬀects 1 1 2 ψ ∂ S + ( S)2 ∇ | | + V =0, (4) of all the other particles in the system. A full theoret- t 2m ∇ − 2m ψ ext | | ical description of this quantum system must take into where we have set ~p ∇S = m~v = m d~x/dt, and V account eﬀects such as non-locality and correlations on ≡ ext is the external potential acting on the particle. The for- all the scales of interest. A continuum description of mer equation corresponds to conservation of probability such quantum gas is often more convenient, and it usu- density, while the latter is recognised as the Hamilton- ally done in terms of an average density, by replacing Jacobi equation. The analogy with classical mechanics the product of many-body wavefunctions with an ap- is self-evident on deﬁning the so-called Bohm potential propriate density operator into the relevant equations of motion. In previous work (Carroll 2005), the transi- 1 2 ψ tion from a microscopic to a continuum (macroscopic) VB = ∇ | |. (5) −2m ψ description of the Bohm’s potential was implicitly as- | | sumed. Thus, in Bohm’s interpretation, the particle moves as In order to justify a continuum approach in the Bohm guided by its own wave function. In the limit of VB ≪ picture more rigorously, let us consider an isolated quan- Vext the trajectory is indistinguishable from its classical tum system of N particles of mass m, described by a one. many-body wavefunction ψ = ψ(x , x , ..., x ), where As mentioned earlier, an alternative viewpoint is to 1 2 N x is the spatial coordinate of the ith particle. For sim- rewrite (1) in the Minkowski metric as i plicity, in the following, we take Vext = 0. The N-body Bohm potential can be written as (Bohm 1952): = m g˜ uµuν ds, (6) S − µν Z p where following Zee (2013) we set 2 (N) 1 i ψ 2V V = ∇ | |, (10) g˜ = 1+ η . (7) −2m ψ µν m µν i=1,N | | X To order d~x/dt 2, ignoring additive constants, the | | above action gives the classical Lagrangian where is the gradient with respect to the ith ∇i m d~x 2 particle coordinates. It is ﬁrst assumed that the L V, (8) many-body wavefunction can be written as a prod- ≃ 2 dt − uct of single-particle wavefunctions: ψ(x1, x2, ..., xN )= th with associated Hamiltonian ϕ1(x1)ϕ2(x2)...ϕN (xN ), where ϕi(xi) is the i parti- 2 cle wavefunction. The expectation value of the Bohm m d~x ~p 2 = + V = | | + V. (9) potential is given by H 2 dt 2m 3 V = dx dx ... dx V (N) ψ 2 = dx V (N)(x ) ϕ (x ) 2 = dx V (N)(x) ϕ (x) 2, (11) h i 1 2 N | | i i i | i i | i | i | Z Z Z i=1X,N Z Z i=1X,N where, is the single-particle Bohm potential. The total particle 2 2 density is n(x) = i ϕi = i ni, where ni is the (N) 1 ϕi(x) | | V (x)= ∇ | | (12) probability distribution for the ith particle. This gives i −2m ϕ (x) P P | i | 2 2 1 √ni 1 √n V = dx ni ∇ dx n(x) ∇ , (13) h i −2m √ni ≈ −2m √n Z i=1X,N Z where the last step applies when each particle’s wave- candidates. With a view to exploring the Bohm poten- function signiﬁcantly extends over their inter-particle tial associated with such dark matter candidates, we separation, and so the single-particle’s amplitudes are apply the previous analysis to the Klein-Gordon equa- assumed to be the same throughout space (that is, tion (Nikoli´c2005, 2007; Shojai and Shojai 2006; Carroll ϕ (x) ϕ (x) ). This is the linearization approxi- 2005) | i | ≡ | 0 | mation of quantum hydrodynamics (Manfredi and Haas ✷ ψ + m2ψ = 0 (15) 2001; Mitcha et al. 2015; Moldabekov et al. 2015), and where ✷ = gµν is the d’Alembertian, and the it strictly applies when the number density of particles ∇µ∇ν ∇µ covariant derivative with respect to the metric g .