U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Bibliography on the Occurrence, Properties, and Uses of Zeolites From
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Regional Distribution of Zeolites in the Basalts of the Faroe Islands and the Significance of Zeolites As Palaeo- Temperature Indicators
The regional distribution of zeolites in the basalts of the Faroe Islands and the significance of zeolites as palaeo- temperature indicators Ole Jørgensen The first maps of the regional distribution of zeolites in the Palaeogene basalt plateau of the Faroe Islands are presented. The zeolite zones (thomsonite-chabazite, analcite, mesolite, stilbite-heulandite, laumontite) continue below sea level and reach a depth of 2200 m in the Lopra-1/1A well. Below this level, a high temperature zone occurs characterised by prehnite and pumpellyite. The stilbite-heulan- dite zone is the dominant mineral zone on the northern island, Vágar, the analcite and mesolite zones are the dominant ones on the southern islands of Sandoy and Suðuroy and the thomsonite-chabazite zone is dominant on the two northeastern islands of Viðoy and Borðoy. It is estimated that zeolitisa- tion of the basalts took place at temperatures between about 40°C and 230°C. Palaeogeothermal gradients are estimated to have been 66 ± 9°C/km in the lower basalt formation of the Lopra area of Suðuroy, the southernmost island, 63 ± 8°C/km in the middle basalt formation on the northernmost island of Vágar and 56 ± 7°C/km in the upper basalt formation on the central island of Sandoy. A linear extrapolation of the gradient from the Lopra area places the palaeosurface of the basalt plateau near to the top of the lower basalt formation. On Vágar, the palaeosurface was somewhere between 1700 m and 2020 m above the lower formation while the palaeosurface on Sandoy was between 1550 m and 1924 m above the base of the upper formation. -
Phillipsite and Al-Tobermorite Mineral Cements Produced Through Low-Temperature Water-Rock Reactions in Roman Marine Concrete Sean R
Western Washington University Western CEDAR Geology Faculty Publications Geology 2017 Phillipsite and Al-tobermorite Mineral Cements Produced through Low-Temperature Water-Rock Reactions in Roman Marine Concrete Sean R. Mulcahy Western Washington University, [email protected] Marie D. Jackson University of Utah, Salt Lake City Heng Chen Southeast University, Nanjing Yao Li Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an Piergiulio Cappelletti Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Mulcahy, Sean R.; Jackson, Marie D.; Chen, Heng; Li, Yao; Cappelletti, Piergiulio; and Wenk, Hans-Rudolf, "Phillipsite and Al- tobermorite Mineral Cements Produced through Low-Temperature Water-Rock Reactions in Roman Marine Concrete" (2017). Geology Faculty Publications. 67. https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs/67 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geology at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Sean R. Mulcahy, Marie D. Jackson, Heng Chen, Yao Li, Piergiulio Cappelletti, and Hans-Rudolf Wenk This article is available at Western CEDAR: https://cedar.wwu.edu/geology_facpubs/67 American Mineralogist, Volume 102, pages 1435–1450, 2017 Phillipsite and Al-tobermorite mineral cements produced through low-temperature k water-rock reactions in Roman marine concrete MARIE D. JACKSON1,*, SEAN R. MULCAHY2, HENG CHEN3, YAO LI4, QINFEI LI5, PIERGIULIO CAppELLETTI6, 7 AND HANS-RUDOLF WENK 1Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, U.S.A. -
Motukoreaite Na2mg38al24(SO4)8(CO3)13(OH)108 • 56H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal
Motukoreaite Na2Mg38Al24(SO4)8(CO3)13(OH)108 • 56H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Hexagonal. Point Group: 32/m. As tabular hexagonal crystals, showing rounded {0001} and possible {1120}, {1011}, {1014}, to 0.2 mm, forming rosettes, boxworks, and subparallel aggregates, and as a claylike cement. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Good on {0001}, perhaps a parting. Tenacity: Sectile, flexible. Hardness = 1–1.5 D(meas.) = 1.43–1.53 D(calc.) = 1.478 Partial dehydration readily occurs. Optical Properties: Semitransparent. Color: Colorless, white, pale yellow, pale yellow-green. Luster: Dull. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+), nearly isotropic. n = ∼1.51, birefringence ∼0.012. ω = n.d. = n.d. Cell Data: Space Group: R3m. a = 9.172(2) c = 33.51(1) Z = 3 X-ray Powder Pattern: Brown’s Island, New Zealand; may exhibit preferred orientation. 11.32 (vvs), 5.58 (s), 4.59 (s), 3.72 (s), 2.578 (s), 2.386 (s), 2.158 (s) Chemistry: (1) (2) (1) (2) SO3 10.00 10.65 CaO 0.92 SiO2 5.55 Na2O 0.71 1.03 CO2 9.32 9.52 K2O 0.10 + Al2O3 17.87 20.35 H2O 19.62 − Fe2O3 0.73 H2O 10.35 MnO 0.70 H2O 32.97 ZnO 0.56 Total 99.41 100.00 MgO 22.98 25.48 (1) Brown’s Island, New Zealand; contains estimated quartz 5%, traces of calcite and goethite; after removal of probable impurities, and with (OH)1− calculated for charge balance, corresponds • to (Na1.50K0.14)Σ=1.64Mg37.36Al22.97(SO4)8.18(CO3)13.81(OH)101.29 58.36H2O. -
Chabazite-Sr (Sr, Ca)2[Al4si8o24]·11H2O - Crystal Data: Pseudohexagonal
Chabazite-Sr (Sr, Ca)2[Al4Si8O24]·11H2O - Crystal Data: Pseudohexagonal. Point Group: 3 2/m. As rough, discoidal crystals, to 0.3 mm; in aggregates to 3 mm. Twinning: On {113}. Physical Properties: Cleavage: Moderate on{101}. Fracture: Rough. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 4-4.5 D(meas.) = 2.16(1) D(calc.) = 2.20 Optical Properties: Transparent. Color: Colorless to yellowish. Streak: White. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Uniaxial (+). ω = 1.503(1) ε = 1.507(1) Nonpleochroic. - Cell Data: Space Group: R3 m. a = 13.715(6) c = 15.09(1) Z = 3 X-ray Powder Pattern: Suoluaiv Mountain, Lovozero massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia. 2.92 (100), 9.38 (80), 4.34 (70), 1.697 (70), 5.55 (60) Chemistry: (1) Na2O 0.85 K2O 2.97 CaO 4.79 SrO 10.32 BaO 0.36 Al2O3 21.74 SiO2 41.33 H2O 18.40 Total 99.76 (1) Suoluaiv Mountain, Lovozero massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia; electron microprobe analysis, H2O by TGA; corresponds to (Sr1.08Ca0.92K0.68Na0.30Ba0.02)Σ=3.00[(Si7.28Al4.62)Σ=11.9O24]·11.06H2O. Mineral Group: Zeolite group, chabazite series. Occurrence: In a K-feldspar and aegirine pegmatite veinlet in an alkaline massif. Association: Analcime, gonnardite, låvenite, vinogradovite, phillipsite, seidozerite, apatite, K-feldspar, aegirine. Distribution: At Suoluaiv Mountain, Lovozero alkaline massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia. Name: From the Greek chabazios, an ancient name of a stone. A suffix indicates the most abundant extra-framework cation. Chabazite without a suffix is the correct name for a member of the chabazite series that is not specifically identified on compositional grounds. -
Zeolites in Tasmania
Mineral Resources Tasmania Tasmanian Geological Survey Record 1997/07 Tasmania Zeolites in Tasmania by R. S. Bottrill and J. L. Everard CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………… 2 USES …………………………………………………………………………………… 2 ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE …………………………………………………………… 2 GEOLOGICAL OCCURRENCES ………………………………………………………… 2 TASMANIAN OCCURRENCES ………………………………………………………… 4 Devonian ………………………………………………………………………… 4 Permo-Triassic …………………………………………………………………… 4 Jurassic …………………………………………………………………………… 4 Cretaceous ………………………………………………………………………… 5 Tertiary …………………………………………………………………………… 5 EXPLORATION FOR ZEOLITES IN TASMANIA ………………………………………… 6 RESOURCE POTENTIAL ……………………………………………………………… 6 MINERAL OCCURRENCES …………………………………………………………… 7 Analcime (Analcite) NaAlSi2O6.H2O ……………………………………………… 7 Chabazite (Ca,Na2,K2)Al2Si4O12.6H2O …………………………………………… 7 Clinoptilolite (Ca,Na2,K2)2-3Al5Si13O36.12H2O ……………………………………… 7 Gismondine Ca2Al4Si4O16.9H2O …………………………………………………… 7 Gmelinite (Na2Ca)Al2Si4O12.6H2O7 ……………………………………………… 7 Gonnardite Na2CaAl5Si5O20.6H2O ………………………………………………… 10 Herschelite (Na,Ca,K)Al2Si4O12.6H2O……………………………………………… 10 Heulandite (Ca,Na2,K2)2-3Al5Si13O36.12H2O ……………………………………… 10 Laumontite CaAl2Si4O12.4H2O …………………………………………………… 10 Levyne (Ca2.5,Na)Al6Si12O36.6H2O ………………………………………………… 10 Mesolite Na2Ca2(Al6Si9O30).8H2O ………………………………………………… 10 Mordenite K2.8Na1.5Ca2(Al9Si39O96).29H2O ………………………………………… 10 Natrolite Na2(Al2Si3O10).2H2O …………………………………………………… 10 Phillipsite (Ca,Na,K)3Al3Si5O16.6H2O ……………………………………………… 11 Scolecite CaAl2Si3O10.3H20 ……………………………………………………… -
Geology of Natural Zeolites and Zeolitic Rocks
Pure &Appl.Chern., Vol.52, pp.2II5—2l3O. Pergamon Press Ltd. 1980. Printed in Great Britain. PlenaryPaper — Geology and Mineralogy GEOLOGY OF NATURAL ZEOLITES AND ZEOLITIC ROCKS Azumalijima Geological Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113, Japan ABSTRACT Presentstatus, particularly development in the latest decade, of the geology of natural zeolites and zeolitic rocks has been overviewed. Emphases are focused on the classification of genetical occurrences and the synthesis deduced from the nature.. INTRODUCTION Nearly two centuries have passed since zeolite was discovered and named by Cronstedt in 1756. Collection and mineralogical description of pretty, coarse crystals were the primary studies of zeolites for a long time till early this century. It is a great monument that the concept of zeolite facies was established by Eskola in 1936 as the low— est grade of the metamorphic facies. The concept was greatly developed by Coombs in New Zealand, having further been visualized by lijima, Seki and Utada in Japan. Researches on zeolites in alkaline, saline lake deposits by Hay, Gude and Sheppard in USA made our eyes open to the zeolite formation at or near the Earth's surface. From deep—sea sediments zeolites were already reported by Murray and Renard in 1891. The Deep Sea Drilling Project (1968—1975) by the Glomar Challenger cruises shed light on the deep—sea zeolites. Our knowledge on natural zeolites and zeolitic rocks has rapidly expanded during the latest two decades. The growth of study on natural zeolites has been and will be stimulated by increasing needs of them as a potential natural resource, instead of synthetic zeolites, particularly in Africa, East and West Europe, Japan, USA and USSR. -
STRONG and WEAK INTERLAYER INTERACTIONS of TWO-DIMENSIONAL MATERIALS and THEIR ASSEMBLIES Tyler William Farnsworth a Dissertati
STRONG AND WEAK INTERLAYER INTERACTIONS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL MATERIALS AND THEIR ASSEMBLIES Tyler William Farnsworth A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Chemistry. Chapel Hill 2018 Approved by: Scott C. Warren James F. Cahoon Wei You Joanna M. Atkin Matthew K. Brennaman © 2018 Tyler William Farnsworth ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Tyler William Farnsworth: Strong and weak interlayer interactions of two-dimensional materials and their assemblies (Under the direction of Scott C. Warren) The ability to control the properties of a macroscopic material through systematic modification of its component parts is a central theme in materials science. This concept is exemplified by the assembly of quantum dots into 3D solids, but the application of similar design principles to other quantum-confined systems, namely 2D materials, remains largely unexplored. Here I demonstrate that solution-processed 2D semiconductors retain their quantum-confined properties even when assembled into electrically conductive, thick films. Structural investigations show how this behavior is caused by turbostratic disorder and interlayer adsorbates, which weaken interlayer interactions and allow access to a quantum- confined but electronically coupled state. I generalize these findings to use a variety of 2D building blocks to create electrically conductive 3D solids with virtually any band gap. I next introduce a strategy for discovering new 2D materials. Previous efforts to identify novel 2D materials were limited to van der Waals layered materials, but I demonstrate that layered crystals with strong interlayer interactions can be exfoliated into few-layer or monolayer materials. -
The Genesis of Zeolites
Eur. J. Mineral. 1989,1,479-487 The genesis of zeolites GLAUCoGOTTARDIt* Istituto di Mineralogia e Petrologia, Università di Modena, via S. Eufemia 19,1-41100 Modena, Italy Abstract: The equilibrium diagrams of zeolites and the different possibilities of synthesizing zeolites starting from chemicals, minerals, and natural glasses are reviewed so to have a general picture of the conditions of crystallization of these minerals. Subsequently, a description and interpretation is given of the geological environments where zeolites crystallize in nature. Key-words: zeolite, diagenesis, very-low-grade metamorphism, hydrothermalism, volcanic glass. 1. Introduction and heulandite generally contain some M+ ca tions, which are almost absent in laumontite, yu This topic has been the subject of so many publi gawaralite and wairakite, so the alkali metal con cations (e.g. Hay, 1978, 1986; Iijima, 1978, 1980; centration in the system may influence the given Kastner & Stonecipher, 1978; Surdam & Shep- boundaries. Additional diagrams on these zeolites pard, 1978) over the last ten years, that one may can be found in the literature, but none is known wonder "Why another one?". As a matter of fact, to the author for zeolites other than those men all these previous studies give detailed informa tioned here. Field and laboratory evidence suggests tion on rock-forming zeolites, generally crystal that some other alkali zeolites may have a stabil lized from natural glasses during diagenesis, but ity field; this is certainly true for clinoptilolite, they omit any consideration of zeolites in veins the siliceous alkali-rich variant of heulandite, and and vugs of massive rocks. The author also aims is also probably true for natrolite and mordenite. -
Mechanical Resilience and Cementitious Processes in Imperial Roman Architectural Mortar
Mechanical resilience and cementitious processes in Imperial Roman architectural mortar Marie D. Jacksona,1, Eric N. Landisb, Philip F. Brunec, Massimo Vittid, Heng Chena,e, Qinfei Lia,f, Martin Kunzg, Hans-Rudolf Wenkh, Paulo J. M. Monteiroa, and Anthony R. Ingraffeai Departments of aCivil and Environmental Engineering and hEarth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; bDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469; cDuPont Engineering Research & Technology, Wilmington, DE 19805; dSovrintendenza Capitolina Beni Culturali di Roma Capitale, Ufficio Fori Imperiali, Rome 00187, Italy; gLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720; iDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; eSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China; and fSchool of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150090, China Edited by David J. Killick, University of Arizona, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 27, 2014 (received for review September 12, 2014) The pyroclastic aggregate concrete of Trajan’s Markets (110 CE), the Theater of Marcellus (44–13 BCE), Mausoleum of Hadrian now Museo Fori Imperiali in Rome, has absorbed energy from seis- (123–39 CE), Pantheon (ca. 126 CE), and Baths of Diocletian mic ground shaking and long-term foundation settlement for nearly (298–306 CE). The monuments that did undergo sectional fail- two millenia while remaining largely intact at the structural scale. ure, for example at the Colosseum (70–90 CE), Baths of Car- The scientific basis of this exceptional service record is explored acalla (ca. 215 CE), and Basilica of Maxentius (ca. -
Erionite, Phillipsite and Gonnardite In
THE AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, VOL. 52, NO\IEMBER-DECEMBER, 1967 ERIONITE, PHILLIPSITE AND GONNARDITE IN THE AMYGDALES OF ALTERED BASALT FROM MAZE, NIIGATA PREFECTURE,JAPAN Kazuo HAnAnA,Chichibu Musewm oJ Natural, History, I{ agatoro, I{ ogami-machi, C hichibu- gun, S a'itama PreJecture, J apon AND Snrcerr lweuoto, KuNrarr Kruana, Geologicaland. Mineralogi- cal Institute, Faculty oJ Science,Tokyo Uniaersity of Educa- t'ion, Otsuha,Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Jopan. Aesrnacr Erionite, phillipsite and gonnardite have been found in the amygdales of altered basalt' Maz6, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Chemical, physical, optical and X-ray data are provided. Erionite is hexagonal, P6z/mmc. IurnooucrtoN Ofiretite, describedby Gonnard in 1890 (seeDana's System,6th Ed., p. 1043),was examinedby Hey and Fejer (1962)who stated that it was identical to erionite. Bennett and Gard (1967, personal comm.) and the present writers found at the same time but independently that erionite and offretite were both valid species.This paper deals with erionite in some detail together with phillipsite, gonnardite, natrolite and analcime. There are many descriptions of zeolites and associatedminerals in the amygdalesof thoroughly weathered and altered olivine basalt and in the andesite exposed along the seashoreof Maz6, in the Iwamure district, Niigata Prefecture. They include apophyllite (Jimbo, 1907), chabazite (Shimazu and Kawakau;ri, 1967), analcime (Shimizu, 1915), natrolite, thomsonite (Mumeikai Group, 1948), heulandite (Harada, Tomita and Sudo, 1966), iron-rich saponite (Miyamoto, 1957). It is the first dis- covery of erionite in Japan. One other occurrence of erionite in altered basalt was describedby Kamb and Oke (1960) with type paulingite. Zaortrn Assnunr-acBs The above-mentioned zeolites and associatedminerals in the amyg- dales of olivine basalt resemble those of the amygdales of the Antrim basalts reported by Walker (1951, 1959, l96la and l96Ib), although levyne, gmelinite and scoleciteare absent at Maz6,. -
Structure Determination and Prediction of Zeolites -- a Combined Study by Electron Diffraction, Powder X-Ray Diffraction and Database Mining
Structure Determination and P r e diction of Z e o l i t e s - A Combined Study by Electron Diffraction, Powder X - Ray Diffraction and Database M i n i n g Peng Guo Structure Determination and Prediction of Zeolites -- A Combined Study by Electron Diffraction, Powder X-Ray Diffraction and Database Mining Peng Guo 郭鹏 Doctoral Thesis 2016 Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden Cover: An old zeolite ZSM-25 is woke up by an alarm Faculty opponent: Prof. Christine Kirschhock Center for Surface Chemistry and Catalysis KU Leuven Belgium Evaluation committee: Dr. Johanne Mouzon Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering Luleå University of Technology Prof. Vadim Kassler Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Dr. German Salazar Alvarez Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry Stockholm University Substitute: Dr. Mårten Ahlquist Theoretical Chemistry and Biology KTH Royal Institute of Technology ©Peng Guo, Stockholm University 2016 ISBN 978-91-7649-384-7 Printed by Holmbergs, Malmö 2016 Distributor: Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry A shrewd and ambitious life needs no explanation. ---Yong-hao Luo (罗永浩) To my family Abstract Zeolites are crystalline microporous aluminosilicates with well-defined cavi- ties or channels of molecular dimensions. They are widely used for applica- tions such as gas adsorption, gas storage, ion exchange and catalysis. The size of the pore opening allows zeolites to be categorized into small, medium, large and extra-large pore zeolites. A typical zeolite is the small pore sili- coaluminophosphate SAPO-34, which is an important catalyst in the MTO (methanol-to-olefin) process. -
Meierite, a New Barium Mineral with a Kfi-Type Zeolite Framework from the Gun Claim, Yukon Canada
1249 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 54, pp. 1249-1259 (2016) DOI: 10.3749/canmin.1400101 MEIERITE, A NEW BARIUM MINERAL WITH A KFI-TYPE ZEOLITE FRAMEWORK FROM THE GUN CLAIM, YUKON CANADA R.C. PETERSON§ Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6 GUNNAR FARBER Bornsche Str. 9,39326 Samswegen, Germany R. JAMES EVANS AND LEE GROAT Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4 LAURA MACNEIL AND BRIAN JOY Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6 BARBARA LAFUENTE PANalytical, 7602 EA Almelo, Netherlands THOMAS WITZKE Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Arizona, USA ABSTRACT Meierite, ideally Ba44Si66Al30O192Cl25(OH)33, is a new mineral from the Gun claim, just south of the Itsi Range, Yukon, Canada. Meierite occurs as equant grains up to 200 lm across, enclosed within large gillespite crystals. The mineral is transparent, has a vitreous luster, and is non-fluorescent. It has a white streak and Mohs hardness of approximately 5½. It is brittle with no observed cleavage. The calculated density based upon the chemical formula and single-crystal unit-cell 3 dimension is 3.50 g/cm . The mineral is optically isotropic (n ¼ 1.598) Electron-microprobe composition (average of 11): SiO2 28.30, P2O5 1.61, Al2O3 11.75, TiO2 0.05, FeO 0.27, CaO 0.21, BaO 47.61, Na2O 0.15, K2O 0.21, Cl 6.64, and a total of 95.29 wt.%. The empirical formula (based on 192 framework O apfu) and charge balance considerations is: Ba41.1Ca0.5Fe0.5 Na0.7K0.6Si62.5Al30.5P3.0O192Cl24.8Á33.4(OH).