Galerius and the Will of Diocletian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Galerius and the Will of Diocletian GALERIUS AND THE WILL OF DIOCLETIAN Between Diocletian and Constantine, there was Galerius. Galerius and the Will of Diocletian offers a fresh study of this critical period in the transfor- mation of the Roman world. Using the political and personal relationship between the great emperor Diocletian and Galerius, his junior colleague and successor, the book comes to some quite different conclusions about the nature of Diocletian’s regime than previously accepted. Drawing from a variety of sources – literary, visual, archaeological; papyri, inscriptions and coins – the author studies the nature of Diocletian’s imperial strategy, his wars, his religious views and his abdication. The author also examines Galerius’ endeavour to take control of Diocletian’s empire, his failures and successes, against the backdrop of Constantine’s remorseless drive to power. The work is built from the premise that the “Tetrarchy”, which Diocletian is often thought to have crafted as a revolutionary alternative to unstable military monarchy, is a creation of modern scholarship and does not actually emerge from the ancient sources. Instead, Leadbetter argues that Diocletian was seeking to craft a dynasty along more traditional lines, using adoption (as had so many of his predecessors) as a tool of statecraft. Galerius, however, did not prove equal to his inheritance, which was ultimately usurped by the more astute and ruthless Constantine. The first comprehensive study of the Emperor Galerius, this book offers an innovative analysis of his reign as both Caesar and Augustus, using his changing relationship with Diocletian as the principal key to unlock the complex imperial politics of the period. Bill Leadbetter, School of Education, Edith Cowan University, Australia. ROMAN IMPERIAL BIOGRAPHIES Also available from Routledge: JULIUS CAESAR: THE COLOSSUS OF ROME, Richard A. Billows CONSTANTINE AND THE CHRISTIAN EMPIRE, Charles M. Odahl NERVA AND THE ROMAN SUCCESSION CRISIS OF AD96–99, John D. Grainger YEAR OF THE FOUR EMPERORS, Kenneth Wellesley AURELIAN AND THE THIRD CENTURY, Alaric Watson SEPTIMUS SERVERUS, Anthony R. Birley TIBERIUS THE POLITICIAN, Barbara Levick VESPASIAN, Barbara Levick AUGUSTUS, Pat Southern DOMITIAN, Pat Southern TRAJAN, Julian Bennett HADRIAN, Antony R. Birley DIOCLETIAN AND THE ROMAN RECOVERY, Stephen Williams AGRIPPINA, Anthony A. Barrett THE AGE OF JUSTINIAN, J.A.S. Evans THEODOSIUS, Gerard Friell and Stephen Williams CALIGULA, Anthony A. Barrett CLAUDIUS, Barbara Levick MARCUS AURELIUS, Antony R. Birley NERO, Miriam T. Griffin GALERIUS AND THE WILL OF DIOCLETIAN Bill Leadbetter ~ 1 Routledge ~ ~ Taylor &Francis Group NEW YORK LONDON FOR MAIA OPTIMA PUELLA First published 2009 Reprinted 2011 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 711Third7Ave nue , New York, NY 1001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2009 Bill Leadbetter Typeset in Garamond by Taylor & Francis All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Leadbetter, Bill. Galerius and the will of Diocletian/Bill Leadbetter. p. cm. “Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada”–T.p. verso. Includes bibliographical references. 1. Galerius, Emperor of Rome, ca. 260-313. 2. Emperors– Rome–Biography. 3. Emperors–Succession–Rome. 4. Diocletian, Emperor of Rome, 245-313–Influence. 5. Diocletian, Emperor of Rome, 245-313–Political and social views. 6. Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, d. 337 7. Imperialism–History–To 1500. 8. Rome–Politics and government–284-476. 9. Rome–History–Empire, 284-476. 10. Rome–History, Military–30 B.C.-476 A.D. I. Title. DG314.L43 2009 9370.08092–dc22 [B] 2009031764 ISBN10: 0-415-40488-6 (HB) ISBN13: 978-0-415-40488-4 (HB) CONTENTS Acknowledgements viii Abbreviations x Introduction 1 1. Dynasts and oligarchs 26 2. Iovius and Herculius 48 3. Augustus and Caesar 81 4. Galerius and Diocletian 114 5. Constantius Augustus 156 6. The Iovii and Herculii 170 7. Galerius Augustus 216 Appendix: Stemma of the Iovii and Herculii 252 Bibliography 253 Index 272 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Humans gestate for thirty nine weeks. This book has taken somewhat longer. Its origins lie in an undergraduate seminar class that I took in 1978 at Macquarie University. Entitled “Rome under the Tetrarchs”, it was led by Ted Nixon, at that stage beginning to make inroads into his long, and now seminal study of late Latin panegyric. It was then, and at Ted’s suggestion, that I began to work on Galerius. That interest led to my 1994 Macquarie doctoral dissertation on Galerius, and thence to this work. At every stage, Ted’s help, criticism, advice and counsel has been invaluable. He has been both mentor (in the best sense of the word) and staunch friend. I was also fortunate to be an undergraduate at a particular time in Macquarie’s history. Edwin Judge taught me to look for what was actually in the evidence rather than impose a view upon it. The argument that this book adopts was formed in partial response to long reflection upon his lectures on the Augustan principate. Margaret Beattie taught me to be an acute critic of my own work; to read it carefully, and have it read, before seeking to rule the line of completion. I owe debts of different kinds to other friends and former Mac- quarie colleagues, in particular Lea Beness, David Clarke, Geoffrey Cowling, Alan Dearn, Tom Hillard, Sam Lieu and Alanna Nobbs. Over the years, I have been fortunate in receiving support, advice, offprints and enjoyable conversation from scholars working in the field. I owe particular debts to Timothy Barnes, Alan Bowman, Peter Brennan, Simon Corcoran, Brian Croke, Hal Drake, Philip Esler, Walter Goffart, Jill Harries, Robert Hohlfelder, Mark Humphreys, John Matthews, Fergus Millar, Tom Parker, Roger Rees, Steven Sidebotham, Alan Walmsley, Bryan Ward-Perkins, Everett Wheeler and Greg Woolf. In Perth, I have received some financial support from Edith Cowan Uni- versity that allowed important visits to Thessaloniki in 1999 and 2007, as well as the leave that promoted the peaceful composition of some of the work in the congenial cylinder that is the Sackler Library. While in Greece, I enjoyed the facilities of the Australian Archaeological Institute in Athens, and access to the Library of the German Archaeological Institute through the good offices of its then director, Hermann Kienast. While in Oxford, I have viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS been fortunate to have had the support of Wolfson College. I have also enjoyed the company, the friendship and the professionalism of Western Australian colleagues, most particularly Peter Bedford, Alex Jensen and David Kennedy. I would also like to acknowledge the enthusiastic support of Mihailo Milinkovic, Mr Bora Dimitrijevic, Director of the National Museum of Zajecar, and Maja Zivic. Every scholar with whom I have spoken, corre- sponded and exchanged offprints about Galerius has contributed, no matter how indirectly, to this work. Its faults, infelicities and imperfections, how- ever, remain my doing. I first learned Ancient History at the feet of Mr Richard Rowling at Barker College in 1974 and 1975. His enthusiasm for his subject and his love for learning have provided me with a profound model for my profes- sional life. My debt to him is incalculable. I continued to learn and teach Ancient History with the loving support of my late parents, Archelias Victor Leadbetter and Ruby Isobel Leadbetter. I wish they could have seen this book. I owe great thanks to Catherine Arends, who travelled with me when she could, bore my absences when she could not, provided me with decisive encouragement to finish and gave me my greatest treasure. My partner, Margo, has been an enthusiastic source of support, and hap- pily tolerated my lonely affair with the computer in my study. I owe her a great debt for her patience, her wisdom, her fortitude, her beauty and her love. My daughter Maia looked at me as I worked on this not long ago, and her eyes grew wide as she saw the number of words on the page. Even so, this work is for her. ix ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviations for the names of journals are those customarily used in similar works and can be found listed in any edition of L’année philologique. Other abbreviations used in the text and notes of this book but not otherwise customary are as follows: ANRW H. Temporini (ed.) (1972–) Aufstieg und Niedergang der Romischen Welt, Stuttgart CAH XII S.A. Cook, F.E. Adcock, M.P. Charlesworth and N.H. Baynes (eds) (1939) The Cambridge Ancient History, Vol. XII, 1st edn, Cambridge CE T.D. Barnes (1981) Constantine and Eusebius, Cambridge, MA Chron Min T. Mommsen (ed.) (1892) Chronica Minora, Monumenta Germaniae Historicae: Auctores Antiquissimi, Vols IX, XI, XIII, Berlin CIL Corpus lnscriptionum Latinarum, Berlin, 1863ff. CLRE R.S. Bagnall, Alan Cameron, Seth R. Schwartz and K.I. Worp (1987) Consuls of the Later Roman Empire, Atlanta CJ “Codex Iustinianus”, in S.P. Scott (1932) Corpus Iuris Civilis, Vols 12–17, Cincinnati C.Th C. Pharr (1951) The Theodosian Code and Novels and the Sirmondian Constitutions: A Translation with Commentary, Glossary and Bibliography, Princeton FGH C. Müller (1848–51) Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum, Frankfurt-am-Main ILS H. Dessau (1892) Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae, 5 vols, Berlin Jakoby Fr Gr. Hist. F. Jacoby (1923–) Die Fragmente der greichischen Historiker, Berlin and London NE T.D. Barnes (1982) The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine, Cambridge, MA x ABBREVIATIONS AND MAIN SOURCES PLRE I A.H.M.
Recommended publications
  • Let's Review Text Structure!
    Grade 6 Day 18 ELA q I Grade 6 Day 18 ELA Grade 6 Day 18 ELA W o Grade 6 Bearcat Day 18 Math pl Grade 6 Bearcat Day 18 Math P2 Grade 6 Bearcat Day 18 Math 173 Grade 6 Bearcat Day 18 Math 104 Grade 6 Day 18 Science pl Grade 6 Day 18 Science P2 Grade 6 Day 18 Science 123 Question for you to turn in. Describe how processes were used to form a landform. Use vocabulary and evidence from the passage to support your answer. RACE. Grade 6 Day 18 Social Studies Grade 6 Day 18 Social Studies to . I ] l n n t t e o o r n n m i i i t r r t t a a p t t h e e a a . r r m h h 1 o o m m t t E r r 0 p p O O e o o n s f f m m r n a i i i l n n o i i r m e e o m p i R t / l m ? ? d d e l l a l l E e e h a a , ci s s T f f s e u u n n n a a m o sp w w o i C C r o o s/ f t t ct t n D D a a e n a s h h s s e i i t m e W W h h n o h r t / co s o t e d r i n n s s p o a i e e e e t i i m s v v n e p r r m m / e i l t e e e e g t c r s s n n a e e o o l E E R R e s.
    [Show full text]
  • PLINY, TRAJAN, HADRIAN and the CHRISTIANS* in the Seventh Book
    PLINY, TRAJAN, HADRIAN AND THE CHRISTIANS* In the seventh book of his work de officio proconsulis, Ulpian collected legal rulings concerning the Christians. The compilers of Justinian's Corpus Juris naturally omitted this material. The Church Fathers again were not interested in copying "the abominable rescripts" which instructed the Roman authorities "by which penalties should be affiicted those who acknowledged that they were worshippers of God. 1 " Eusebius himself, when describing "the martyrdoms of our own time," does not reproduce the anti-Christian ordinances of the Tetrarchs, though he quotes in full the decrees of Galerius, Maximinus, Licinius and Constantine on behalf of the Church. Again, he copies Gallienus's letter to some bishops (of Egypt?) on restoration of Church property, but not the edict of Valerian on confiscation of this property. 2 In other words, the Christian tradition, quite naturally, preserved documents which attested "the gracious and favoring interposition of God, 3 " and did not care to retain the memory of the imperial legislation against the Church. 4 Thus, only two imperial rescripts on trials of Christians have come down to us verbatim : a letter of Trajan to Pliny, and a letter of Hadrian. 5 * A review article of Rudolf Freudenberger, Das Verhalten der romischen Behorden gegen die Christen im 2. Jahrhundert dargestel(t am Brief des Plinius an Trajan und den Reskripten Trajans und Hadrians (Miinchener Beitriige zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsge­ schichte, 52. Heft). Miinchen, 1967, C.H. Beck, X + 258 pp. In this edition, the observations on Freudenberger's work have been omitted. Some abbreviations: Abbott-Johnson = F.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 Constantine.Key
    Roman Civilization 27: Constantine Administrative Stuf Paper III • Tesis and Topic Sentences: Due Now Midterm II • Tursday! Class website • htp://www.unm.edu/~cjdietz/romanciv/ • Updated. Administrative Stuf Paper III • Due: May 10, 5:30 p.m. Course Evaluations • Your feedback is requested. • You should have received an email from UNM. Check your email. Fall Semester: • Greek Civilization • MW 5:30-6:45 • Registration is open! • Tell your fiends! Questions? Te Dominate Starting with Diocletian Diocletian November 20, 284 - May 1, 305 Rise to Power • Born: December 2, 244 in Spalatum (Split, Croatia) • Emperor on November 20, 284 • Te Dominate (fr. Dominus) Te Dominate Starting with Diocletian Principate to Dominate • Imperator to Dominus • No longer concerned with any illusions of a republic • Dominus as divine • Proskynesis • Luxury palaces • Diocletian’s Palace Diocletian’s Palace, Split, Croatia Diocletian November 20, 284 - May 1, 305 Tetrarchy • Knew empire was too big to manage efectively • In 286, named Maximian co-emperor Tetrarchy Caesares and Augusti Tetrarchy March 1, 293 Empire was too big to manage, even with two emperors • Tetrarchy = tetra + archy (cf. monarchy) • East • Augustus: Diocletian • Caesar: Galerius • West • Augustus: Maximian • Caesar: Constantius Te Tetrarchy Confusing Tetrarchy Caesares and Augusti East West Augustus Diocletian Maximian Abdicated: May 1, 305 Abdicated: May 1, 305 Caesar Galerius Constantius Confusing Tetrarchy Caesares and Augusti East West Augustus Galerius Constantius Died July 25, 306 Caesar
    [Show full text]
  • GALERIUS, GAMZIGRAD and the POLITICS of ABDICATION Bill Leadbetter Edith Cowan University
    GALERIUS, GAMZIGRAD AND THE POLITICS OF ABDICATION Bill Leadbetter Edith Cowan University /DFWDQWLXV· pamphlet, the de mortibus persecutorum, is a curious survival. In one sense , its subject matter is given lustre by the reputation of the author. Lactantius was a legal scholar and Christian thinker of sufficient prominence, in the early fourth century, to be appointed tutRUWR&RQVWDQWLQH·VHOGHVWVRQ+H was also a polemicist of some wit and great Figure 1: Porphyry head of Galerius savagery. A rhetorican by training, his muse from Gamzigrad drew richly upon the scabrous vocabulary of villainy that seven centuries of speech-making had concocted and perfected. His portrayal of the emperor Galerius in the de mortibus has been influential, if not definitive, for generations of scholars LQWKHVDPHZD\WKDW7DFLWXV· poisonous portrait of Tiberius distorted any analysis of that odd, lonely, angry, bitter and unhappy man (eg: Barnes, 1976, 1981; also Odahl, 2004). /DFWDQLXV· Galerius is not merely bad, he is superlatively bad: the most evil man who ever lived («VHGRPQLEXVTXLfuerunt PDOLVSHLRU«9.1). A vast and corpulent man, he terrified all he encountered by his very demeanour. Despising rank (21.3) and scorning tradition (26.2), /DFWDQWLXV·*DOHULXVLVDERYHDOOIXQGDPHQWDOO\ foreign. Lactantius makes much of his origins as the child of Dacian peasant refugees who settled in the Roman side of the Danube after the Carpi had made Dacia too unpleasant for them (9.4). His Galerius, therefore, is at heart, a barbarian. He is an emperor from beyond the Empire, a monstrous primitive with a savage nature and an alien soul. Lactantius describes him at one point as an enemy of the Romanum nomen and asserts that Galerius intended to change WKHQDPHRIWKH(PSLUHIURP´5RPDQµWR´'DFLDQµ 27.8) and in general was ASCS 31 [2010] Proceedings: classics.uwa.edu.au/ascs31 an enemy of tradition and culture, preferring indeed the company of his pet bears to that of elegant aristocrats and erudite lawyers (21.5-6; 22.4) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Persecution of Licinius
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies Legacy Theses 1999 The persecution of licinius Gearey, James Richard Gearey, J. R. (1999). The persecution of licinius (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/14363 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/25021 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY The Persecution of Licinius by James Richard Gearey A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF GREEK, LATIN AND ANCIENT HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA JUNE, 1999 Wames Richard Gearey 1999 National Library Biblioth&que nationale 1+1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Sweet 395. me Wellington Ottawa ON K 1A ON4 OltewaON KIAW Canada Canada YarrNI VOV.~ Our im Mr. mIk.nc. The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive pennettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliotheque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, preter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette these sous paper or electronic formats.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey in Pictures: Christianity Conquers Rome
    A Journey in Pictures: Christianity Conquers Rome By Ursula Kampmann, © MoneyMuseum What is god? A Roman who believed in the state gods and a Roman who believed in Christianity would have answered this question quite differently. For the former, the gods were powers which could be induced by magic ceremonies to be well disposed to man. For the latter, God was a loving father who had sent his Son to mankind to redeem all who believed in him. While the Roman gods demanded their rituals, the Christian God claimed the complete person, jealously forbidding him to venerate other gods. The Roman and Christian understanding of god was so different that the one was not prepared to yield to the other peacefully. How and why, however, did it come about that Christianity replaced the Roman cults? 1 von 19 www.sunflower.ch The Roman form of piety Pietas standing before a burning altar, strewing incense over the flame from a box with her left hand. A sesterce of the Roman co-emperor Lucius Verus (161-169 AD), minted for his wife Lucilla The Romans considered pietas to be the basis of their state. If we were to translate "pietas" with the English word "piety" we would not convey the right meaning. "Pietas" meant reverence for everything handed down by one's ancestors: faithfully performing all the domestic rituals, accepting political responsibility and personal ties, obedience towards those who were older and ranked higher. The person who complied with the divine order without wanting to change it in any way was "pius." He could be assured of the solicitude of the gods who rewarded him for his pietas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Numismatic Iconographical Study of Julian the Apostate
    A Revolutionary or a Man of his Time? A Numismatic Iconographical Study of Julian the Apostate Master’s Thesis in Classical Archaeology and Ancient History, Spring 2018 Department of Archaeology and Ancient History Lund University Author: Nicolas Frendin Supervisor: Henrik Gerding 2 Abstract Julian the Apostate’s short rule has left in the historical records a clearly divisive picture. This thesis starts with that divisive nature of the reign of Rome’s last pagan emperor and aims to analyse some of the Apostate’s coinage iconography. Can the symbols used on the coins minted during his reign say something about his allegedly revolutionary rule? By choosing to focus on a set of ten symbols found of Julian’s coins, this thesis was subsequently divided in a three-phased analysis in order to approach the subject. Julian’s coin iconography was first analysed in comparison to the totality of the Roman Emperors, stretching back to Octavian/Augustus. The second step was to put Julian’s rule within its own context and compare his coinage iconography to that of his predecessors in his own family, the second Flavian dynasty. The last step was to observe the changes during Julian’s two periods of time in power: being first a Caesar – subordinate to his cousin Constantius II – and later on the sole ruler/Augustus. Julian’s iconography was also compared to Constantius’. The results tend to show that most of Julian’s coin iconography could be characterised as conventional. The true departures can be divided into either obvious or surprising ones. 3 Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Diocletian Biography 244 Born to a Family of Low Status in the Roman Province of Dalmatia
    Diocletian Biography 244 Born to a family of low status in the Roman province of Dalmatia. Diocletian's parents were of low status, and writers critical of him claimed that his father was a scribe or a freedman of a senator. 264 Diocletian rose through the ranks of the military to become cavalry commander to the Emperor Carus. 284 In confusion at death of Carus, generals and tribunes called a council for the succession, chose Diocletian as emperor. On 20 November 284, the army of east gathered on a hill 5 kil. (3.1 mi) outside Nicomedia, army unanimously saluted Diocletian as new augustus, Diocletian example of the soldier- emperor who will dominate rest of roman history. (Constantine) 284 After his accession, Diocletian and Lucius Caesonius Bassus were named as consuls and assumed the fasces 284 MILAN: Dio. made his way to northern Italy, but it is not known whether he visited the city of Rome at this time. some modern historians state that Diocletian avoided the city, and that he did so on principle, as the city and its Senate were no longer politically relevant to the affairs of the empire and needed to be taught as much. Diocletian dated his reign from his elevation by the army, not the date of his ratification by the Senate, 285 MILAN. Diocletian raised his fellow-officer Maximian to the office of caesar, making him co-emperor. Diocletian was in a less comfortable position than most of his predecessors, as he had a daughter, Valeria, but no sons. His co-ruler had to be from outside his family, raising the question of trust.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FORGED LETTER ATTRIBUTED to MARCUS AURELIUS One
    CHAPTER SIX THE FORGED LETTER ATTRIBUTED TO MARCUS AURELIUS One of the most interesting sources related to the rain miracle is the— surely forged—Greek letter in which the emperor reports the events to the senate. The text was preserved in a 14th-century manuscript (Cod. Par. Gr. 450) attached to the Apologia of the Greek Church Father Jus- tin.1 The letter, its date, and value as a source have been vehemently debated;2 therefore it is worth examining it separately. Although Scaliger had already devoted some attention to the letter,3 it was only Harnack who fi tted it into the sources on the rain miracle in detail.4 According to him the letter is obviously forged, but it fol- lowed reliable sources, as 1. its author knew about the emperor’s letters addressed to the senate; 2. he describes the blockade and the thirst; 3. he gives an account of the solders’ prayer; 4. he tells the story of the rain comforting the Romans and the thunder destroying the enemy; 5. he names two Romans: Pompeianus and Vitrasius Pollio; 6. he has exact topographic data; and 7. he mentions troops who surely partici- pated in the war. Moreover, the author includes Marcus praying, too, therefore he must have known the pagan version of the legend, and answered it in this way. He must also have known the information stemming from Tertullian and Eusebius, according to which the emperor had prohibited further persecution of the Christians. Thus, the terminus post quem for the writ- ing of the letter is A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Articles About Ancient Coins by Joseph Kleinman Pacific Ancient Numismatists (PAN)
    Compilation of articles about ancient coins by Joseph Kleinman Pacific Ancient Numismatists (PAN) This introductory article, and the 16 subsequent articles in the compilation, were first published in The Nor’wester from 2000 to 2005 as noted. The text in this compilation is the same as in the original articles, except for minor edits for clarity. Ancient Numismatics by Joseph Kleinman This article was first published in The Nor’wester, 4th Quarter 2000. Consider to possibility that you and I are Romans. Consider the possibility that what they were, we are. This is how I begin a program on The Third Century and the Fall of Rome, just one of the many programs presented at our PAN Meetings. We are the Pacific Ancient Numismatists, a club dedicated to the advancement of Ancient Numismatics in the Pacific Northwest. Did you ever stop to consider that you and I are the inheritors of the great civilizations developed by Greece and Rome? These English words that you are reading are 2/3 Latin written with the Latin Alphabet. Our Democratic form of government was developed in Ancient Athens and our Republican Constitution in Ancient Rome. The Atomic Theory was first proposed in Greece as well as the Germ Theory of Disease. Time does not allow me to discuss all the many benefits that the ancients have passed down to us. Now consider that very few us own a genuine piece of art created by our ancient benefactors. This is a situation that never has to exist. Ancient coins can tell us so much about our common past and the people who lived it.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximinus Daia, a Roman Emperor Who May Have Had Graves' Disease
    HORMONES 2013, 12(1):142-145 Historical note Maximinus Daia, a Roman emperor who may have had Graves’ disease and died of a thyrotoxic crisis Peter D. Papapetrou Honorary Director, Division of Endocrinology, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece ABSTRACT Evidence is presented that the Roman emperor Maximinus Daia had Graves’ disease and died of severe thyrotoxicosis. The information about this emperor’s terminal illness is drawn from the writings of the 4th century writers Eusebius and Lactantius. An existing statue indicates that the emperor had bilateral Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Key words: Maximinus Daia, Roman emperor, Graves’ disease INTRODUCTION abandoning his troops, fled initially to Nicomedia In the year 305 A.D. the two Roman Emperors and subsequently to Tarsus where he died about four 1 (Augusti) Diocletian and Maximian abdicated and months later. Maximinus Daia was born in November a new system of imperial government known as the 270 and died in August 313, and his final illness and Tetrarchy was set up. The new government included death is the subject of the present article. The fourth 2 3 two Augusti and two Caesars. One of the new Caesars century writers Eusebius and Lactantius described was Maximinus Daia (known also as Maximin) who Maximin’s death in considerable detail, mentioning was entrusted with the governing of Syria and Egypt. symptoms and signs of his fatal illness which are com- During the ensuing years several civil wars broke out patible with what is today known as Graves’ disease. between the rulers of the Roman Empire. In the win- The relevant excerpts from the works of Eusebius ter of 313 Maximinus Daia started a civil war against and Lactantius are given below in English translation, Licinius.
    [Show full text]
  • Persecution & Adoption
    Lessons • Introduction and Overview • Spread of Christianity • Church and State – Persecution and Adoption • Doctrine – Orthodoxy vs. Heresy Part I • Doctrine – Orthodoxy vs. Heresy Part II 1 Church & State – Persecution and Adoption Persecution – Why? • Christians don’t worship the Emperor (bad for loyalty and unity) • Christians are Atheists – worship invisible God not “the gods” (I Thessalonians 1:9) • Christians are unpatriotic – don’t participate in civic events • Christians disrupt [idol selling?] business • Christianity is responsible for economic decline, plagues, invasions, etc. • Christians are Cannibals – Rumors spread from Communion • Christians practice Incest – Rumors from references to brother / sister and greetings with holy kiss • Christians are anti-family (willing to leave relatives for their cause) • Christianity is one of those new-fangled eastern mystical religions • Christians are odd and secretive I Thessalonians 1:9 - “For they themselves shew of us what manner of entering in we had unto you, and how ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God” 2 Church & State – Persecution and Adoption Persecution – How Much? • Persecutions Were Generally Sporadic and Geographically Isolated ➢ Persecutions were most often localized ➢ Substantial intervals of relative peace are experienced ➢ For most of the 2nd and 3rd Century “Trajan’s Advice” to Pliny applied ❖ Do not expend effort seeking out Christians (it’s not worth the effort and cost) ❖ If someone is accused, give them opportunity to recant ▪ If they
    [Show full text]